did you noticed that g300 is brighter than g200? Because based on the specs on their website, g200 clocks in at 85800 Lux (max mode @ 4300k) and the g300 is only 81100 Lux (max mode @ 4300k) with 1M + Standard reflector
HIGHLIY MISLEADING because the power supply and cable needs a separate backpack of their own while let's say, light like godox has the powersource included, so which is actually taking less backpacks?
i would differ actually, thats the whole point of the design. it makes it smaller and easier to pack instead of one large piece thats ridged. Also think about mounting. its easier to uphold one signle lighter fixture (especially if you are at a angle working against gravity) vs a bigger one piece thats heavier.
I'm planning on getting 2 lights for indoor studio use and for weddings as well. I'm contemplating between getting either 2x this MOLUS G300 or the Amaran 300c, which one would you rather recommend ? thank you
only if you boost it to max, on paper both is 300w but stablility i would recommend the aperture since its designed for 300w long term use, i would chose the G300 over G200 if you want higher output.
being moving houses thats why I haven't been uploading, but got a exciting new gimbal coming soon. stay tuned~!
Any readings for brightness and color accuracy?
did you noticed that g300 is brighter than g200?
Because based on the specs on their website, g200 clocks in at 85800 Lux (max mode @ 4300k) and the g300 is only 81100 Lux (max mode @ 4300k) with 1M + Standard reflector
is the swivel mechanism geared inside or has hard stops?
you referring to the buttons to adjust brightness and CCT? if so no, its inifite turnable, and its clickable to adjust incremental settings
@@MrTechTok the one that locks the angle of the light to the light stand.
@@ChrisRamasola unfortunately no incremental settings, its free to move
thanks for the comparison!
Thanks for watching!
The light is small but you neeed a separate room just for the power supply 🤣🤣
HIGHLIY MISLEADING because the power supply and cable needs a separate backpack of their own while let's say, light like godox has the powersource included, so which is actually taking less backpacks?
i would differ actually, thats the whole point of the design. it makes it smaller and easier to pack instead of one large piece thats ridged. Also think about mounting. its easier to uphold one signle lighter fixture (especially if you are at a angle working against gravity) vs a bigger one piece thats heavier.
Very interesting review, I really like your style tbh! You earned a sub :)
By the way, curious what's your monitor on top of the one in the back?
cheers ! its a benq EW32
, mostly for gaming and video/editing
I'm planning on getting 2 lights for indoor studio use and for weddings as well. I'm contemplating between getting either 2x this MOLUS G300 or the Amaran 300c, which one would you rather recommend ? thank you
if you going outdoors, im assuming you are since you do doing wedding? then you might want to look at something more weather resistent my friend.
I’m literally trying to decide between those same two lights, which one did you get and are you happy with it?
@@layhandzonem6670 plans have changed for me and I ended up getting no lights for now, let me know for which lights you decide on
Can the g300 match the aputure light in brightness?
depends on which one you are referring to?
This was awesome. Thank you for this informative and frankly honest review
Glad it was helpful!
Does the G200 put out as much light at the Aperture 300?
only if you boost it to max, on paper both is 300w but stablility i would recommend the aperture since its designed for 300w long term use, i would chose the G300 over G200 if you want higher output.
Is there a carry case for it? to bring around for shoots
yes, G200 have storage bag
G300 does not have a case. Which is quite disappointed🥲
@@MikeTOTzzz i am using gutek casing for it haha, it is so much cheaper than pelican case 😆
Bowens mount is still plastic in the G300 🤔
it was never plastic in the first place. it would melt bro.
@@MrTechTok another reviewer confirmed it wasn't metal...
It should be metallic