Jim knew that last time Ricky was there, he hated the egg smell so he wanted to make sure studio was smell free but sam said fast food was already stinking up the place (at the beginning)
Yea he thinks he's some genius comedian when he wrote 2 great TV shows and everything else has just been kinda meh. What's truly hilarious is if you ever watch the show where him, Louie , Seinfeld and Chris Rock discuss comedy and it's bizarre to think he even considers himself in there league in terms of stand up.
ElvisLivesUpstairs Still waiting on this link? Or did you just make it up? After googling it all I found was reddit speculation from nobody's. They worked together for years but I think Steve has the right to do some stuff with different people as does Ricky. There is absolutely zero evidence of a rift between the two. This is how Trump won, nobody checks anything people say and just believe them
I've heard this myth many times that there was a falling out. I've never seen a shred of evidence, and I find it highly unlikely to be true. I think one person just speculated somewhere online, and others took that as a fact. I'd be willing to bet big money they're all still mates, and they're all just busy with their own projects.
Wow, that was meta. I recognised one of the presenters as the "he stinks, and I don't like him!" guy from Spider-man (2002) just at the exact moment he used the word "stinks". I mean wtf, am I dreaming again or what?
Ugh, love Ricky. But he’s one of the originators of talking about the “craft” of comedy and the business of “show”. He’s a completely different person in this episode. The one with Jane in the background was the best.
Can anyone please explain the drunk driving joke to me? English is not my first language and it drives me crazy that I don‘t get the pun around „nearly killed“. For me its the same meaning what Ricky says, or the Reporter who quoted him wrong.
Because he had been going on since the OnA days n jim is also a comedian who he likes n respects I think. You can tell when hes on hes just having fun n shooting the shit now imagine him being "INTERVIEWED" by stern oh yeah I can hear jokes flying now. Your right he should go on n have an unfunny appearance on a show he doesn't care about doing just for the fuck of it. Really just listen to what he said in this clip. He talks about wanting to be more of a stand up than all then other shit. So think about why would he wanna go on stern n try to get thru it n figure out the chemistry on the spot with some1 uve never done radio with n hope it will actually be funny which stern hasnt been for atleast a decade. Not that jim n sam is always hilarious but ricky is when hes on so.
I think Polanski is a despicable dude... but I still find "Fearless Vampire Killers" hilarious! It's weird getting stuck there, in that place, when you like a product, but the actors and writer(s), producers etc made it funny too. Probably more so... Or is that me making excuses? I love "Smooth Criminal" -that bassline..But I can't shake the fact that sharing a bed with children must be a bit... off piste y'know? Also I read this awesome interview with a pornstar who said "the casting couch is very real, and it doesn't stop... so I'd rather do it when I want to, rather than to get a chance of a part!" I thought that was pretty cool!
Ricky is a great guest but he recycles a lot of his insight and stories. I think that can be down to the interviewer as well. Last 20 mins of this interview were great tho!
I’ve watched about 4 of these interviews now and they keep telling the same stories. Why would u do that do u think they actually forget or can’t fill an hour with actual chat.
nicholas thxbyelawl it is tho I saw them all in here with my own eyes. They kept discussing the same things as if it was all scripted but acted as if they hadn’t mentioned them before search for yourself.
the comedy show edit i hate the most is when a white comedian tells their N-word chunk and they cut to a black couple laughing. "SEE! IT'S OKAY! NOTHING WRONG GOING ON HERE!!!!"
Thats where ricky is wrong, we, the audience, can VERY MUCH tell if he's done his own bit wrong. The version we remember and want to see on stage is always the same as the best version we've seen online.
They make a fair point (and Patrice did too, a while back) about excusing someone's behavior because we like their product. However, if we are going to boycott, we should go all the way; not only should we not watch movies or music created by rapists/pedophiles, but we should also apply that logic across the board. We know about conditions in Apple factories in China, for instance, so we should no longer use Apple products. We know that the clothes that we buy are made in sweatshops throughout India and Asia, so we should stop buying them. Basically, if we stopped using every product that was made by someone who did something terrible, we would be back to candles, horses, and hand-written letters. Louis CK's bit about "Of course, but maybe" had an ending about this very concept. In my mind, living in today's f*cked up society means that we inevitably use something created by a monster who inflicted human suffering (either to create the product, or for their own pleasure). Personally, I can like a product without liking the creator, and have accepted that existing in today's world means indirectly supporting the suffering of others, by buying products from monsters. I guess I might not reluctantly accept it if I could get those same products from someone who isn't a monster, but no one else made that music or movie, and every corporation selling phones and clothes is equally guilty. Essentially, there are no good options, so we shouldn't act as though we are outraged by one monster, while ignoring another (like these guys said about calling out Weinstein, but praising Polanski). Either they all deserve to be called out, and we just suffer without good music/movies or affordable phones/clothes, or we accept that this is the world that we live in, and that those profiting at the top are almost always monsters (you don't get to the heights of power without doing monstrous things to get ahead).
+CalvinSomething Please enlighten me: to what assumptions do you refer? Also, I used "we" to refer to society as a whole- how is that arrogant? Also, how is what I said wrong in your opinion, when I am just expanding on what Patrice, Jim, Denis, and Sam have all said about Polanski, Jackson, etc.? The concept being, in all cases: "Can we look past the monster creating the thing that we love, or do their monstrous acts mean we should eschew their products?
+CalvinSomething Wherein did I speak for society? I didn't say "We are this" or "We believe that", which would be speaking for society. I said my opinion on what "we" as a society should do- apply that logic equally. It is the same thing that the comics I named said. I am not speaking FOR our society, I am speaking about what I think society should do. Vast difference. I would agree that, if I said that I spoke for our society, that would be arrogant; however, giving my opinion on what our society should do isn't arrogant- everyone has opinions about what our society should do. That is why politics exist- because people have ideas of what we should do as a society. Again, since you seemed to miss the point, my whole argument was merely that we shouldn't cherry-pick our outrage, and that we should apply standards equally/evenly. I went a bit further in explaining that I don't see many good options for boycotting horrible people that make good movies/music/clothes/phones, but the main point was about applying outrage over monstrous acts to some, while ignoring others. And again, it concurred with the comics' views on the matter.
+CalvinSomething Wow. I guess I should have noticed before that you were trolling, given the ridiculousness of what you were saying. Thinking about what we as a society should do is arrogant? Then everyone on the face of the planet is arrogant, since we all talk about things that we think are f*cked up in society, or how it should change. I am not sure how a rational person could think anything I said had to do with supporting dictatorships, but again, it is becoming clear that you are just trolling, and do not have a legitimate point. Lastly, the monstrous acts to which I refer are pedophilia, rape, and exploitation boarding on slavery; I think most people think of these things as monstrous, but if you can justify them, then perhaps you should worry about supporting a dictatorship (because they often support these monstrous acts). Also, nothing in my argument was emotional- it was purely rational/logical. Clearly, I am more informed on the subject than you are, since you seem to have no idea about which you speak, and continue to devolve into personal attacks, rather than making a logical counterpoint. If you can muster an actually reasonable argument, then perhaps I will respond; if you continue this trend of baseless assertions and antagonistic insults, I will realize you are trolling, and disregard any further posts.
+chunkycake101 Not really. I don't think he had to excuse it as something he disliked but tolerated- I think he liked it. He was equally racist, and admitted as much.
James Corden messed up big time, the jokes were indeed sloppy and the punchlines were predictable. He should take a look at Russell Brand’s ability to tackle a tough subject well.
He has been saying the same stuff again and again for years! Used to love Ricky but something happened where he just passed his peak and came down hard.
I'm glad Ricky couldn't make the IRA joke work. Serves him right for stealing it from Stewart Lee, whose audience got it. Either they are older or better educated.
What a weird comment. This is Ricky's type of thing, he likes this type of format sometimes, honest, raw comedians hanging out. Ever.seen the Ricky Jervais Show? Or "Talking Funny" with Seinfeld, Chris Rock, and Louis CK? Or his specials? And he also has this format on the Opie and Anthony radio show, and other places with other comedians. This is basically an interview, at least this section; it's not meant to make you laugh as it's primary goal; it's just conversation and a sort of "inside view" (the whole premise behind "The Office". and many of his works, incidentally). And he IS philosophical about comedy and, in his own words, an "auteur"(which I'd probably agree with for sure), but he is also self-deprecating, I understand if you don't get him or like him, but the blanket statement "podcasts are ruining stand up" doesn't make sense to me. Comedy has always been evolving and growing, and it's diverse. Podcasts are a different thing, but it's part of the whole thing. It allows for insight into what the guest thinks and feels about topic with less "jokes",again- akin to an interview like on a late show, but without the pressure to be funny every second. If you don't care what they think and find no entertainment value, then just don't watch podcasts.
Ricky is always a fresh breath of air in times where everyone is too busy being mad at things that have nothing to do with them.
Love the rapport you guys have with Ricky. Always a good time.
Ricky referencing a Patrice bit is fantastic to hear.
Jim Norton is one of the nicest comedians working today.
The dude asked about a actors murdered mother so no not really.
Funny though. Sam is that smell of manure
@Phil Taylor Sam is great, what's your deal with him?
@@DeronimoGeeSam is a manchild that tries too hard to fit in with funny people. Opie2.0 but not at bad.
He’s a nice boy, not like that dirty Chipper Chipperson
This intro is glorious...... thank you Ricky Gervais for always bringing the funny
Jim knew that last time Ricky was there, he hated the egg smell so he wanted to make sure studio was smell free but sam said fast food was already stinking up the place (at the beginning)
imagine Ricky with a mullet and moustache and aviator glasses with a smoke hanging out the mouth .... that would be badass
Eastbound and Down Ricky? Hell yeah brother.
Ricky's great when he just talks about current events and shit, but he constantly gets meta about comedy itself etc. Every fucking time.
Like at 19:50 . How many times have we heard the "there will be people who complain about THEIR thing, but laugh at all the other subjects".
George Mirchev because I've heard him say the same shit over and over. He's great when he just joins a discussion
I meta girl last night
maybe it takes that kind of person to become a great stand up comedian
Yea he thinks he's some genius comedian when he wrote 2 great TV shows and everything else has just been kinda meh. What's truly hilarious is if you ever watch the show where him, Louie , Seinfeld and Chris Rock discuss comedy and it's bizarre to think he even considers himself in there league in terms of stand up.
Ricky is the best guest ever!
Jim is talking about playing Don Rickles in The Irishman
You can feel Jim aching to say that he's putting on weight for a Scorsese film.
Looking forward to Ricky on the radio again. XFM was great although that was largely due to a dopey bald manc.
Sam Bbk I'm still waiting for Ricky, Steve and Karl to do some new podcasts. Has to be the three of them though
Reb Brown that will be hard. Stephen and Ricky don't talk anymore.
ElvisLivesUpstairs really? I haven't heard that story? Link?
ElvisLivesUpstairs Still waiting on this link? Or did you just make it up? After googling it all I found was reddit speculation from nobody's.
They worked together for years but I think Steve has the right to do some stuff with different people as does Ricky. There is absolutely zero evidence of a rift between the two.
This is how Trump won, nobody checks anything people say and just believe them
I've heard this myth many times that there was a falling out. I've never seen a shred of evidence, and I find it highly unlikely to be true. I think one person just speculated somewhere online, and others took that as a fact. I'd be willing to bet big money they're all still mates, and they're all just busy with their own projects.
51:54 Jimmy got the "Oh, what do you mean?!" that Karl always got.
Billy Connolly filmed across a tour....worked great!
music and freedom of speech, well said
Looking forward to his radio show.
When Sam and Jim are telling Ricky what the Silk Road is, they immediately turn into two 12 year old teaching grandpa about the dark web
Would love to see Louie on the Jim and Sam Show?
Kicking Mel Gibson for his drinking is like having a go at Hitler for his blase stance on recycling.
Yeah, because being a drunken racist is so close to murdering millions of Jews.
Chip got a million downloads in way less time. "applause" (clap clap clap clap) FFFFFOOOT!
Great show! But is the nail biting booored intern in the background also the camera man?
Is the movie role Jim’s talking about gain weight for The Irishman?
jalent810 yup
a small role in some independent thing
These guys successfully freak ricky out at the end
Yer a good guy Rikki Gervais!
Exactly (re: ~37:00) I----
I had my appendix removed/had a tonselectomy, so why would I ever do such a thing!?
Norton is 52 now and Sam is 37. Crazy, they pretty much look the same age lol
both Jimmy and Sam are so fucking nervous. Look at Jimmy's arms and Sam fucking with his headphone cables.
Half of the stories told are the same as his previous interview with Jim & Sam
Wow, that was meta. I recognised one of the presenters as the "he stinks, and I don't like him!" guy from Spider-man (2002) just at the exact moment he used the word "stinks". I mean wtf, am I dreaming again or what?
Gave you a like just cuz no one else had.
STOP TALKING TO ME ABOUT SCIENCE MAKE ME TELEVISION
You guys are decent
Ricky should be the next person to be the prime minister and say what ever the fuck he wants
32.00 patrice shout out but it was you are not alone
How could Sam have only just found out that Jim and his little buddies used to 'trade sucks'
that's a legendary Jim story!!
i think he just wanted an excuse to bring it up
In relation to his new movie, it would appear that Ricky has re-made 'A Man Called Ove'.
Everytime Ricky talks about serious subjects like sweaty balls , i wonder what Karl Pilkington take on it would be
Can’t stand it, that. Suzanne picked me up a powder for prevention
Is that Jimmy Carr in the background?
Anyone else catch that wink Norton gave Sam at 40:30?
Lol. O&A did this to him.
Where's Jane? Never mind, she's probably hanging out with all her friends.
That film went on to be the Irishman
Ugh, love Ricky. But he’s one of the originators of talking about the “craft” of comedy and the business of “show”. He’s a completely different person in this episode. The one with Jane in the background was the best.
He’s obviously written that opening himself 😂😂😂
40:29 cute wink. Why?
He kind of winks and twitches a lot. I don't think it meant anything
Nah his iintention was apparent as the clip went on, he similarly bombed by doing a harvey weinstein bit.
Plenty of comedians do crowd work. Having cameras on the audience is pretty useful for them.
Can anyone please explain the drunk driving joke to me? English is not my first language and it drives me crazy that I don‘t get the pun around „nearly killed“. For me its the same meaning what Ricky says, or the Reporter who quoted him wrong.
"How do people know about it?" It´s Thor Browser.. ----> Thor Browser ;D
Not going to lie I am not a massive fan of Ricky but fuck he is spot on
My publisher has decided to cancel my forthcoming book..."Sexual Harassment in the Workplace...and Where to get it"
Why don't you have more subs? Don't get it. Always got great content.
I as a viewer at home laugh when I see someone in the audience laughing or just to see their reaction is the same as mine ....I dont know just sayin
I can't understand why Ricky goes this show so often and has never been on Stern. I guess he doesn't care for him or Stern doesn't like him?
Because he had been going on since the OnA days n jim is also a comedian who he likes n respects I think. You can tell when hes on hes just having fun n shooting the shit now imagine him being "INTERVIEWED" by stern oh yeah I can hear jokes flying now. Your right he should go on n have an unfunny appearance on a show he doesn't care about doing just for the fuck of it. Really just listen to what he said in this clip. He talks about wanting to be more of a stand up than all then other shit. So think about why would he wanna go on stern n try to get thru it n figure out the chemistry on the spot with some1 uve never done radio with n hope it will actually be funny which stern hasnt been for atleast a decade. Not that jim n sam is always hilarious but ricky is when hes on so.
Don't knock the talc Ricky!
Ricky's bit about the IRA and Isis was inspired by: ua-cam.com/video/nwkEEqXT3uQ/v-deo.html
I think Polanski is a despicable dude... but I still find "Fearless Vampire Killers" hilarious! It's weird getting stuck there, in that place, when you like a product, but the actors and writer(s), producers etc made it funny too. Probably more so... Or is that me making excuses? I love "Smooth Criminal" -that bassline..But I can't shake the fact that sharing a bed with children must be a bit... off piste y'know?
Also I read this awesome interview with a pornstar who said "the casting couch is very real, and it doesn't stop... so I'd rather do it when I want to, rather than to get a chance of a part!" I thought that was pretty cool!
Ricky is a great guest but he recycles a lot of his insight and stories. I think that can be down to the interviewer as well. Last 20 mins of this interview were great tho!
Yeah. This was at least the second.. maybe the third time I've heard him tell the drunk driver story. And that's only on Jim & Sam.
Adam Hauger yeah that's the second time, but I don't think he was trying to be funny this time, I think he was using it as a point of reference
It would be less monotonous if he changed his opinion on everything between each interview he did.
Is Jim on Coke?
On weight......a doctor told me
The mirror lies.....friends lie.....but the scale never lies.
Still listen to XFM. His new podcast needs Karl n Steve 🙏🙏
The only problem with this video is that the words and sound don’t really match
The trick is to wear the same clothes all the time
I’ve watched about 4 of these interviews now and they keep telling the same stories. Why would u do that do u think they actually forget or can’t fill an hour with actual chat.
because you're statement isn't true?
nicholas thxbyelawl it is tho I saw them all in here with my own eyes. They kept discussing the same things as if it was all scripted but acted as if they hadn’t mentioned them before search for yourself.
I used powe cause it's swooshy feelling but then I heard it caused cancer and stopped
Why does Norm's podcast get hundreds of thousands of views and thousands of viewer comments per episode........and here......well..........
Amazing that no one asked Roger Federer in the background to come on to the mic and say a few words
45:32
Ricky should write a book about the mechanics of standup. Maybe something like Jonathan Lynn's 'Comedy Rules'.
corden's a bellend
CO creator of the office and extras
Nuts?
Sam is looking very klingon.
the comedy show edit i hate the most is when a white comedian tells their N-word chunk and they cut to a black couple laughing. "SEE! IT'S OKAY! NOTHING WRONG GOING ON HERE!!!!"
can someone please tell me if they can see me ? because if not it means I've been shadowbanned
From#India
From #Indiana
Thats where ricky is wrong, we, the audience, can VERY MUCH tell if he's done his own bit wrong. The version we remember and want to see on stage is always the same as the best version we've seen online.
Why is Sam funnier than Jim here? I miss old Jimmy
RIght, that is the bulk of the issue for a country, isnt it?
Is free speech a priveledge, a right, or a necessary hybrid/marriage?
Dan Lo Fat No one should face incarceration for using words, however no one is forced to give you a platform for those words.
You know what rhymes with... james corden? late night boredom.. he's not important.
who gets the reference
Fox Wolf Its a line from drop the mic isnt it?
not tired o sukin on his fab manboobs tho
yumzzzzzzzzzz
These 3 guys are seated, yet the rubbish camera man can't keep them in frame.
We get it. Writing good jokes is hard. Congratulations.
They make a fair point (and Patrice did too, a while back) about excusing someone's behavior because we like their product. However, if we are going to boycott, we should go all the way; not only should we not watch movies or music created by rapists/pedophiles, but we should also apply that logic across the board. We know about conditions in Apple factories in China, for instance, so we should no longer use Apple products. We know that the clothes that we buy are made in sweatshops throughout India and Asia, so we should stop buying them.
Basically, if we stopped using every product that was made by someone who did something terrible, we would be back to candles, horses, and hand-written letters. Louis CK's bit about "Of course, but maybe" had an ending about this very concept. In my mind, living in today's f*cked up society means that we inevitably use something created by a monster who inflicted human suffering (either to create the product, or for their own pleasure). Personally, I can like a product without liking the creator, and have accepted that existing in today's world means indirectly supporting the suffering of others, by buying products from monsters. I guess I might not reluctantly accept it if I could get those same products from someone who isn't a monster, but no one else made that music or movie, and every corporation selling phones and clothes is equally guilty. Essentially, there are no good options, so we shouldn't act as though we are outraged by one monster, while ignoring another (like these guys said about calling out Weinstein, but praising Polanski). Either they all deserve to be called out, and we just suffer without good music/movies or affordable phones/clothes, or we accept that this is the world that we live in, and that those profiting at the top are almost always monsters (you don't get to the heights of power without doing monstrous things to get ahead).
+CalvinSomething Please enlighten me: to what assumptions do you refer? Also, I used "we" to refer to society as a whole- how is that arrogant? Also, how is what I said wrong in your opinion, when I am just expanding on what Patrice, Jim, Denis, and Sam have all said about Polanski, Jackson, etc.? The concept being, in all cases: "Can we look past the monster creating the thing that we love, or do their monstrous acts mean we should eschew their products?
+CalvinSomething Wherein did I speak for society? I didn't say "We are this" or "We believe that", which would be speaking for society. I said my opinion on what "we" as a society should do- apply that logic equally. It is the same thing that the comics I named said. I am not speaking FOR our society, I am speaking about what I think society should do. Vast difference. I would agree that, if I said that I spoke for our society, that would be arrogant; however, giving my opinion on what our society should do isn't arrogant- everyone has opinions about what our society should do. That is why politics exist- because people have ideas of what we should do as a society.
Again, since you seemed to miss the point, my whole argument was merely that we shouldn't cherry-pick our outrage, and that we should apply standards equally/evenly. I went a bit further in explaining that I don't see many good options for boycotting horrible people that make good movies/music/clothes/phones, but the main point was about applying outrage over monstrous acts to some, while ignoring others. And again, it concurred with the comics' views on the matter.
+CalvinSomething Wow. I guess I should have noticed before that you were trolling, given the ridiculousness of what you were saying. Thinking about what we as a society should do is arrogant? Then everyone on the face of the planet is arrogant, since we all talk about things that we think are f*cked up in society, or how it should change.
I am not sure how a rational person could think anything I said had to do with supporting dictatorships, but again, it is becoming clear that you are just trolling, and do not have a legitimate point.
Lastly, the monstrous acts to which I refer are pedophilia, rape, and exploitation boarding on slavery; I think most people think of these things as monstrous, but if you can justify them, then perhaps you should worry about supporting a dictatorship (because they often support these monstrous acts). Also, nothing in my argument was emotional- it was purely rational/logical. Clearly, I am more informed on the subject than you are, since you seem to have no idea about which you speak, and continue to devolve into personal attacks, rather than making a logical counterpoint.
If you can muster an actually reasonable argument, then perhaps I will respond; if you continue this trend of baseless assertions and antagonistic insults, I will realize you are trolling, and disregard any further posts.
+CalvinSomething Okay. Bye now.
+chunkycake101 Not really. I don't think he had to excuse it as something he disliked but tolerated- I think he liked it. He was equally racist, and admitted as much.
opie is better
Sam is super creepy!
#tradesucks
James Corden messed up big time, the jokes were indeed sloppy and the punchlines were predictable. He should take a look at Russell Brand’s ability to tackle a tough subject well.
Kal Morgan he didn't mess up money wise or success wise
James Corden and Russell Brand are both horrible
is it online?
Good god I hate that twat. People can't see through the facade. Stupid people ;)
Watch Stewart Lees newer stuff...genius.
Why am I watching this? What a waste of time.
#Tradelicks #femenism
Americans talk so much; it’s exhausting.
He has been saying the same stuff again and again for years! Used to love Ricky but something happened where he just passed his peak and came down hard.
I’ve got to poop
Snack lots of bitter richard herring fans here
then fires out Humanity and Afterlife - suck it!
I'm glad Ricky couldn't make the IRA joke work. Serves him right for stealing it from Stewart Lee, whose audience got it. Either they are older or better educated.
You not scared to talk about anything Ricky ???? ya hypocrite........Talk about Muslims in England.....go on........
Comedians pontificating about standup comedy on podcasts has ruined standup comedy
No you did
But stand up comedy isn't ruined
Isaac Chassman no it hasn't it's a totally separate forum
Nope. Why do you say that?
What a weird comment. This is Ricky's type of thing, he likes this type of format sometimes, honest, raw comedians hanging out. Ever.seen the Ricky Jervais Show? Or "Talking Funny" with Seinfeld, Chris Rock, and Louis CK? Or his specials? And he also has this format on the Opie and Anthony radio show, and other places with other comedians. This is basically an interview, at least this section; it's not meant to make you laugh as it's primary goal; it's just conversation and a sort of "inside view" (the whole premise behind "The Office". and many of his works, incidentally).
And he IS philosophical about comedy and, in his own words, an "auteur"(which I'd probably agree with for sure), but he is also self-deprecating, I understand if you don't get him or like him, but the blanket statement "podcasts are ruining stand up" doesn't make sense to me. Comedy has always been evolving and growing, and it's diverse. Podcasts are a different thing, but it's part of the whole thing. It allows for insight into what the guest thinks and feels about topic with less "jokes",again- akin to an interview like on a late show, but without the pressure to be funny every second. If you don't care what they think and find no entertainment value, then just don't watch podcasts.
RICKY needs to replace the wine with smoking weed!! He will lose weight & feel MUCH BETTER than drunk & hungover!
🔥😎👍
It might affect his comedy, either in a good way or a bad way.
Ricky's people sent a blurb? I'm starting to lose my affection for Ricky. It's bad enough that he leaves Steve out of programs he's made.
Nx Doyle Ricky said himself he doesn’t want Jim to read the blurb. It’s Ricky’s people being twats and not Ricky himself
poor ricky
the world a bit tired of his schtick
sad
Highest paid Uk Netflix standup special
$ can , obviously, not buy u happiness.
he reeks of self hate.
Oh like he is sad inside 😄
teenie, are you just sad that nobody asked you to trade sucks as a kid?
teenie beenie speak for yourself