1000%%. USA are sending an old weapons to Ukraine; M1A1 tanks, F-16s, ban land mines, Challenger 2, German tanks, Turkish drones.... most of $68Billions goes to US MIC
We dont have to sugarcoat the outcome of the battlefield. Rest assured, if the Western equipment was doing well in Ukraine, pictures of superiority and noise of being the best in the world was going to be all over the mainstream media platforms.
I am not agreeing with you, the news supposed to be all over the universe, we supposed to see some UFO, landing all over the world to ask what's going on. During and after the first gulf war, in Callifornia, they were every night, driving the streets singing "WHO YOU BETTER CALL, PATRIOTS". It was Moshe arens, Israeli defence minister, Dan shomron, chief of staff and Asa, who said, the patriot system is a myth, it intercepted maybe one or none of the SCUDs, all of them fell on their heads. Very close of us, why the Saudis accepted a ceasefire whit the houtis, because the houtis missiles got the permission from the patriot systems to hit their wooden swollen neck, they don't have jead those bachibuzus.
The US is very generous in donating arms and weapons. Vietnam museums are full with American tanks and aircrafts. So also Afghanistan. In fact, the US fully equipped the new Afghan army with their weapons 😅
Yes very generous. Though not as generous as Russia has been to Ukraine by donating all those garbage Russian tanks. Russia, the only nuclear power to be invaded. This is the great Russian war machine?? Pathetic
👍 Yes, the Afghan Emirati army uses U$ heavy vehicles such a Humvees, troup carriers, etc., while when they fought as guerillas, the had only portable weapons.
American weapons are great but seems Russian ones are equally good just Russia fighting it's own war has much more available while Ukraine has to beg for scraps
@@janssmidt4136 Please check history of this conflict and you will realize that USA and NATO started this conflict. And it started with with unification of Germany and a promise to USSR/Russia for NATO not to move East! But as you should realize USA/NATO lied, as usual.
Ukraine sell weapons in the Black Market. Too ISSIS bought 2 Caesars SP. Earl on the war, Ukraine soldiers trade Javelins as nd it's launcher for Russian MRE & Cartoons of cigarettes as Ukraine have poor logistics supply.
The US and NATO weapons are meant to be tested in actual battle conditions, not to win the war. This is derived from the fact that the quantities are insufficient and the arrivals are sporadic. The one thing that all parties are sure of is the defeat of Ukraine... they only disagree on the time table.
Ukraine never , ever, had a chance to " win " a war of attrition against Russia and that is what this has become. Ukraine simply doesnt have the population to do that and everyone knew that.
Honestly I have to disagree that the quantities of the donated weapons & equipment were anything close to small or sporadic. It's more than 500 tanks, 1.000 IFVs, 3.000 APCs, 500+ self-propelled artillery, 3-400 MLRS, over 50 HIMARS & M270 systems, 1.000+ towed artillery, over 100.000 ATGMs, countless amounts of MRAPs & IMVs, over 1.000 anti-air autocannons, 10 Patriot SAM batteries, NASAMS, IRIS-T, 60+ helicopters, 50 MiG-29s & Su-25s, and countless other pieces of equipment.
@@djsahilking3807 It's not junk, the F-35 is still a capable jet, but it costs way too much and has a lot of shortcomings and technical issues. But really, nothing from the US Arsenal seems any kind of superior to the Russian counter-parts. Russia learns a lot from fighting NATO equipment every single day, this will help them a lot in the future and present. Generally, western weapons have failed to deliver results compared to the insane propaganda-show of how superior and better they are compared to Russian or Chinese tech.
@@Nokamigg США отстают от российских технологий.Я не говорю что они плохие или не работают,они работают,но У России на любое западное оружие есть противодействие.А у США и в целом альянса нету противодействия Искандерам Кинжалам и сейчас Орешнику самому мощному не ядерному оружию в мире.Ни одной из этих ракет Запад не смог сбить.А Россия все их ракеты сбивает.Пусть не все,но сбивает.Потому что ни одно ПВО не даст 100% гарантий уничтожить все ракеты.
@@truthadvocacy Right: was the "missile' traveling at 60 mph. or above Mac 6? BTW, It's speed your country doesn't have, let alone can't stop them! Correct me if I'm wrong, I was certain anything over 6 times speed of light was HYPERSONIC.
😂😂😂😂😂 after years of condemning Chinese products to be of poor quality we are now seeing the real poor quality military products or equipments in Ukraine
@@jnisharFailure rate of American and European military equipment are very high. Take those leopard and Abrahms for example. 1/3 were broken befoee reaching the actual battlefield due to mud. Then F16, at least 2 broken down after delivery. Then even manpad and nlaws 1/5 failed for no reason (could be due to mud again). Bradleys? About 40% broken down as well but Americans did ship those in thousands so at least the qty make up for the deficiency. Even if you apply same or double failure rates to Russians, their ability to repair and produce are at lesst 6x better than NATO. And throughout the war, Russians weapon proof to be more resilient than the west. In an all out non-nuke war, I dont see how Americans can win or even stallmate. In a nuke war, MAD principle applies to USA and EU but not so much to Russia with their mass quantities of hypersonic missiles and world best air defense missiles. So you are looking easily like 20 to 1 nukes success delivery. Russia being twice the entire NATO landmass absolutely will survive a nuke war ww3. The onky way American can win is to stop global warming and peaceful development. That way Russian siberia will not thaw and American can still outcompete Russian in civilian economy. Alas, I dont see that happening. In 20 years time, American population at best slightly over 400M while Russians will double to close 300M+. That would put them near American level and with China as world biggest GDP economy in all mrtrics, Russia will gain a significant spillover effect just like Canada and Mexico being close to USA.
Patriots cannot shoot down old 2960s Soviet era Scud missile in Saudi Arabia ! USS Cook was disabled as nd the Aegis system doesn't work when Russian jet flew over her in Baltic Sea. Many crews requested transfers after this incident !
The United states weapons was never had a fight against a real military power like Russia so now the United states and NATO countries have to go back to the drawing board 😂😂😂😂
@@SnakePliskin7622 broken down just after deliveries. Plus over 4 being shotdown. The rest rumored to have dismantle and sold. To date I read no more than 10 sorties. It is bad. Even Su27 being way cheaper able to make impact in Kherson area. I still waiting F16 help. Maybe they shpuld convince Tom Cruise to be there as well?
Most of the ATACMs missiles were successfully intercepted by Russian air defence system. Whereas, no NATO weapons can intercept Russian Oreshnik missiles!!
@@NazifNazifov-rb4ifNone of Russian hypersonic intercepted. While only 1 out of 20+ ATACMs slip thru. Over 50+ western support engineers killed in the underground due to bunker busting Oreshik missile. This is looking so bad for USA.
Two things to consider. When the arms companies build new weapons they only need to produce a small number of actual working items because they are mainly just put into storage secondly they need to keep buying new systems to replace the old so the old would be worthless - to get some money back they start wars in smaller countries and then sell them the old stuff at massive interest rates
All of them....lol, wtf war you watching? Ukraine is losing on all fronts. Even the long range use of the ATACMS is being met with overwhelming firepower.
The US & NATO allies with their might still couldn't beat the Taliban's with thier faulty AK 47 and flipflops. After almost 20 years in Afghanistan they left.😅😅😅
@@richard-v8p8c Duhhh..."invade" is used misleadingly, it presumes one party wrong but the other right. The word is aggression. But for Ukraine's aggression, from 2014 onward, Russia would have no need to retaliate. When you are correct, there is no need for personal attacks. Keep it civil!
@@lesliethomas7234 so it isn't aggression when you use your military to cross the border with the mission to overthrow another country and oppress the people of that country? Russia invaded the Crimea and TOOK the land. Then they invaded the Ukraine AGAIN with the goal of taking Kiev in 3 days. Invasion=aggression.
Just like israel, the USA has fallen deeply into the inevitable trap of believing your own hype. Resulting in sever humility when you get your ass handed to you on a plate by a "far inferiour" foe. PLEASE SUPPORT THE AXIS of RESISTANCE..❤❤❤❤
Failed : patriot and other anti aircraft’s defenses Abrams Leopard as well as Amx or challenger Instead Bradley and stinger or javelin definitely worked Striker or cv 90 not game changer but not bad
In regard to manufacturing of military equipment, World War Two proved that big quantity wins over small quantity, even if the latter may be better quality.
They don't get money, they get weapons for defence. These weapons have already been produced, and just as Russia is using weapons produced under the Soviet Union, so America is sending weapons produced against the Soviet Union. It is like giving you a car worth $3000. Yes, I contributed $3000, but in reality I got rid of an old car that was rusting in the garage. If Ukraine loses, Western countries will still have to make weapons to defend themselves against Russia. At the same time the battlefield seems to be completely changing and old weapons will not be enough in the future.
We just spend money; the US has 11 super carriers at a cost so astronomical a person really can't conceive of. As I'm sure everyone knows we "outspend" the world on military stuff and yet no one mentions that we don't have enough of what we actually need. And incidentally, aircraft carriers are obsolete against a peer military. Hell, the Houths control the Red sea and our forces pulled out.
FACT: It doesnt matter how advanced the weapons are, if you fail to deploy/use them properly and/or you lack Troops with sufficient training to make them effective.Reliable, multiple reports of Ukraine being reduced to press ganging civilians off the street into the Military and sending " weekend warrior" Natl Guard Troops to the front lines due to Troop losses are impossible to ignore now.
Are you implying 400K Americans troop deployed to Afghanistan poorly trained like WW1 Russians? There no 400K American troops left the day after that infampus Kabul flee. I have encountered any military officers worldwide in the last 2 years able to opinionated that America won in Afghan...and some of them Amerixan themselves. As for stalemate, only 1 explain that way. The reat all concluded Talevan goatherders in Yoyota decimated Americans. If the weapon sucks, just say so. Complaining troops poorly trained is equally bad if not worse off than saying American weapon is of China made-quality.
Its US armies operated the hightech cutting edge missiles like Patriot n ATACM. But failed miserablely. Shows US wars adversaries losts to fight against Russia capablelities.
I wonder who many weapons ended up on the black market and how many dollars ended up in the pockets of Zelensky and his minions. Would be interesting to know.
western weapons have been touted how advanced they are how good they are (but not how expensive they are) and with media help in missleading possible customers, but in the last couple of years we have seen how bad they really are, one thing for sure it gives countries who are looking to upgrade there weapons to see how they really work and if they do that it is russian weapon systems they will be looking at
Russia, Ukraine, Britain, EU, US, you are not tired of killing and destroying, and ruining innocent lives, you should think about peace and not about who will bring how many weapons and show his power... Where is your conscience and humanity...
They're not fighting no sheep herders in Afghanistan or Iraq they couldn't defeat them so what you going to do with the near peer but get defeated cuz ain't nothing changed in Iraq Afghanistan nothing but the dis stabilization
Anyone who choose to fight on either side, the battlefield reality is not a walk in the park, the pure devastation of artillery drones and all Military equipment and the exploitation around you. You will piss your pants at some point.
The US only sent about thirty Abrams tanks which were specifically targeted by the enemy forces. Yes, they are dwindling in number but then Australia is sending another 49 Abrams as we speak. They are far superior to Russian tanks
I think is not eighter the arrow or the arch but the native. I believe that the best is Donald Trump stops this madness. Every army will have the territory these have in that moment,.
All I can say at this time is, it is impossible for Keiv to counter Moscow just with US Weaponary, the Russians are masterminds in their tactics and they know the terrain like the Americans don't, without the direct involvement of the US and NATO, the Russian Federation will take Ukraine one fine day. As American it is hard to accept this, but its the truth.
western mbts - too heavy, too intricate, too delicate, too expensive - one just cant afford to field as many as one like or as frequently desired in a protracted conflict
again like Gen. Shephard(OG) from COD MW 2 said "sure they got the biggest stick but what matters is helluva lot who is swinging" Ukraine got awesome and powerful Tanks, Cannons, Missiles and Jets but they still get cooked by Russians despite their losses.....Russians may lost 1000s of Tanks and Jets but Ukraine's tech are more important than Russia and they lost heavy than Russians
it's all about trying to figure out if the defense weapons and offense weapons are better than Russia,North Korea and Iran that's y we r spending billions of dollars.
begging for cutting edge weapons is not a good way to fight a war talkless winning! Am I the only one seeing this play out??? this is a PSA to zelensky, save what is left before there is nothing left!
Most classes of weapons were very disappointing in this war. Once again the rule is confirmed - in a real large-scale war, simple, mass, cheap and universal weapons win. Such classes as tanks, air defense, and aviation after the Second World War became more and more expensive, more complex, fewer in number and more narrowly specialized, and when it comes to Western models, this is exacerbated even more. Patriot air defense - terribly expensive missiles, few in number, difficult to master by personnel, ineffective against ballistic missiles - as a result - low air defense density over a large territory - low efficiency in general. Abrams tank - high cost, few in number, poor unification with other equipment, narrow specialization is often unnecessary - lack of high-explosive fragmentation ammunition - as a result, practically useless in combat
On the other hand, there are also good examples and innovations, especially where civilian products are adapted or where Russia has no analogues. The M2 Bradley has proven itself as an idea for a well-protected infantry fighting vehicle, while its Russian counterpart, the Kurganets-25, was not popular before the war. The Rochelle Senator, an armored car based on a civilian car, has proven itself very well - simple and very numerous
Most of those American weapons are going to end up in the Scrap yard.
1000%%. USA are sending an old weapons to Ukraine; M1A1 tanks, F-16s, ban land mines, Challenger 2, German tanks, Turkish drones.... most of $68Billions goes to US MIC
Also Russia are using soviet old weapon too.
We dont have to sugarcoat the outcome of the battlefield. Rest assured, if the Western equipment was doing well in Ukraine, pictures of superiority and noise of being the best in the world was going to be all over the mainstream media platforms.
I am not agreeing with you, the news supposed to be all over the universe, we supposed to see some UFO, landing all over the world to ask what's going on. During and after the first gulf war, in Callifornia, they were every night, driving the streets singing "WHO YOU BETTER CALL, PATRIOTS". It was Moshe arens, Israeli defence minister, Dan shomron, chief of staff and Asa, who said, the patriot system is a myth, it intercepted maybe one or none of the SCUDs, all of them fell on their heads. Very close of us, why the Saudis accepted a ceasefire whit the houtis, because the houtis missiles got the permission from the patriot systems to hit their wooden swollen neck, they don't have jead those bachibuzus.
Gamechanger after gamechanger, yet the game stays the same
👍
and now russia has yet another new "game changer" missile. lol
@@jnishar The Satan II?
The game changers western weapons are moving Ukraine backwards....what a great changed indeed 😅😅
They are sending game charger Russia is using war sustainer.
68billion wasted.Imagine if this had gone into food security.
68 billion dollars can house all the homeless people in America.
@georgewong1837
Rather, all the world.
Over 200 billion now !!!!!
The US is very generous in donating arms and weapons. Vietnam museums are full with American tanks and aircrafts. So also Afghanistan. In fact, the US fully equipped the new Afghan army with their weapons 😅
Yes very generous. Though not as generous as Russia has been to Ukraine by donating all those garbage Russian tanks. Russia, the only nuclear power to be invaded. This is the great Russian war machine?? Pathetic
👍 Yes, the Afghan Emirati army uses U$ heavy vehicles such a Humvees, troup carriers, etc., while when they fought as guerillas, the had only portable weapons.
American weapons are great but seems Russian ones are equally good just Russia fighting it's own war has much more available while Ukraine has to beg for scraps
Don’t kid yourself, none of these weapons are free, resource accessibility, land, crops, water, they want something.
😂😂😂
These weapons only perform well in hollywood propaganda. in Reality these weapons are military showpieces for military parade 😂
Or in contrived test scenarios.🤣
To make it worse, 🇷🇺can sell those weapons to 🇨🇳 for Reverse Engineering 🤯
Russia is not Africa and the Middle East, the hegemony powers should be aware because Russia has been too patient to respond.
respond..? are you mental??? HE IS THE AGRESSOR
@@janssmidt4136 like Iraq or Libya?
Respond with what? Nato has Russia outmatched 10 to 1 😂
@@janssmidt4136 Please check history of this conflict and you will realize that USA and NATO started this conflict. And it started with with unification of Germany and a promise to USSR/Russia for NATO not to move East! But as you should realize USA/NATO lied, as usual.
@@TheRandyWanker and the 2014 maidan coupe. American has always been the egressor everywhere, spreading "democracy" and "human rights"
Judging by Ukraine's recent request for more weapons, all the Western weapons are losing.
well.......... russia is doing fine
@@janssmidt4136Better than fine, I mean Ukraine wants systems better than the Patriot after last week's strike.
Ukraine sell weapons in the Black Market. Too ISSIS bought 2 Caesars SP. Earl on the war, Ukraine soldiers trade Javelins as nd it's launcher for Russian MRE & Cartoons of cigarettes as Ukraine have poor logistics supply.
The US and NATO weapons are meant to be tested in actual battle conditions, not to win the war. This is derived from the fact that the quantities are insufficient and the arrivals are sporadic.
The one thing that all parties are sure of is the defeat of Ukraine... they only disagree on the time table.
Ukraine never , ever, had a chance to " win " a war of attrition against Russia and that is what this has become. Ukraine simply doesnt have the population to do that and everyone knew that.
Honestly I have to disagree that the quantities of the donated weapons & equipment were anything close to small or sporadic. It's more than 500 tanks, 1.000 IFVs, 3.000 APCs, 500+ self-propelled artillery, 3-400 MLRS, over 50 HIMARS & M270 systems, 1.000+ towed artillery, over 100.000 ATGMs, countless amounts of MRAPs & IMVs, over 1.000 anti-air autocannons, 10 Patriot SAM batteries, NASAMS, IRIS-T, 60+ helicopters, 50 MiG-29s & Su-25s, and countless other pieces of equipment.
Excuses..excuses...excuses...admit it...US and NATO weapons are obselete...
Overpriced American junk weapons.
Exactly.
Even Elon musk said F-35 is junk😂😂
Late-Capitalism's boutique industries.
@@djsahilking3807 It's not junk, the F-35 is still a capable jet, but it costs way too much and has a lot of shortcomings and technical issues. But really, nothing from the US Arsenal seems any kind of superior to the Russian counter-parts. Russia learns a lot from fighting NATO equipment every single day, this will help them a lot in the future and present. Generally, western weapons have failed to deliver results compared to the insane propaganda-show of how superior and better they are compared to Russian or Chinese tech.
@@Nokamigg США отстают от российских технологий.Я не говорю что они плохие или не работают,они работают,но У России на любое западное оружие есть противодействие.А у США и в целом альянса нету противодействия Искандерам Кинжалам и сейчас Орешнику самому мощному не ядерному оружию в мире.Ни одной из этих ракет Запад не смог сбить.А Россия все их ракеты сбивает.Пусть не все,но сбивает.Потому что ни одно ПВО не даст 100% гарантий уничтожить все ракеты.
Because disposable drones have changed the way ground warfare is fought. A $100 dollar Drone can defeat a million dollar tank.
The Oreshnik hypersonic missile the true and real game changer that cannot be shot down by all Nato air defence systems put together.
It is not an "hypersonic" missile, but a missile carrying MIRVs. The techless media always makes the confusion.😂
@@truthadvocacy still it cannot be shot down.
@@truthadvocacy Right: was the "missile' traveling at 60 mph. or above Mac 6? BTW, It's speed your country doesn't have, let alone can't stop them! Correct me if I'm wrong, I was certain anything over 6 times speed of light was HYPERSONIC.
@@Makroti1050-z9y Don't waste your time on sore losers such as truthadvocasy.
@@letranger6750Typo? Sounnd instead of light?
😂😂😂😂😂 after years of condemning Chinese products to be of poor quality we are now seeing the real poor quality military products or equipments in Ukraine
really?? are you serious?
@@jnisharFailure rate of American and European military equipment are very high. Take those leopard and Abrahms for example. 1/3 were broken befoee reaching the actual battlefield due to mud. Then F16, at least 2 broken down after delivery. Then even manpad and nlaws 1/5 failed for no reason (could be due to mud again). Bradleys? About 40% broken down as well but Americans did ship those in thousands so at least the qty make up for the deficiency. Even if you apply same or double failure rates to Russians, their ability to repair and produce are at lesst 6x better than NATO. And throughout the war, Russians weapon proof to be more resilient than the west. In an all out non-nuke war, I dont see how Americans can win or even stallmate. In a nuke war, MAD principle applies to USA and EU but not so much to Russia with their mass quantities of hypersonic missiles and world best air defense missiles. So you are looking easily like 20 to 1 nukes success delivery. Russia being twice the entire NATO landmass absolutely will survive a nuke war ww3. The onky way American can win is to stop global warming and peaceful development. That way Russian siberia will not thaw and American can still outcompete Russian in civilian economy. Alas, I dont see that happening. In 20 years time, American population at best slightly over 400M while Russians will double to close 300M+. That would put them near American level and with China as world biggest GDP economy in all mrtrics, Russia will gain a significant spillover effect just like Canada and Mexico being close to USA.
@@jnishar Boeing
Patriots cannot shoot down old 2960s Soviet era Scud missile in Saudi Arabia !
USS Cook was disabled as nd the Aegis system doesn't work when Russian jet flew over her in Baltic Sea. Many crews requested transfers after this incident !
The United states weapons was never had a fight against a real military power like Russia so now the United states and NATO countries have to go back to the drawing board 😂😂😂😂
F16 joins the list of Western wonder weapons that failed in Ukraine
nope
do they.. who says so??
you should watch real news
not russian media
The real battle is against CO2.
@@SnakePliskin7622 broken down just after deliveries. Plus over 4 being shotdown. The rest rumored to have dismantle and sold. To date I read no more than 10 sorties. It is bad. Even Su27 being way cheaper able to make impact in Kherson area. I still waiting F16 help. Maybe they shpuld convince Tom Cruise to be there as well?
@@jameschalkwig787 absolute bs,only one has been shot down and that was a friendly fire.
Russia is not Hollywood.
Who's fighting against Russia?
USA
Poor NATO...they did not learn anything in Afganistan it seems..
Most of the ATACMs missiles were successfully intercepted by Russian air defence system. Whereas, no NATO weapons can intercept Russian Oreshnik missiles!!
you keep believing that propaganda about the ATACMS comical Ali
Sure, Ivan, we trust u👏
@@NazifNazifov-rb4ifNone of Russian hypersonic intercepted. While only 1 out of 20+ ATACMs slip thru. Over 50+ western support engineers killed in the underground due to bunker busting Oreshik missile. This is looking so bad for USA.
@@NazifNazifov-rb4ifsaid by person name Nazi, whole world know, what happened when Nazi Germany mess with russian 🐻 😂
Giving all that money to Ukraine but yet our cities is falling and they say billions but somebody pocketing that money
Зеленський says thanks
It's MONEY Laundering. War is a RACKET !
Uraaaaaaaaa 🔥🔥
Bravo pak Putin 🇷🇺❤️💪💪
Two things to consider. When the arms companies build new weapons they only need to produce a small number of actual working items because they are mainly just put into storage
secondly they need to keep buying new systems to replace the old so the old would be worthless - to get some money back they start wars in smaller countries and then sell them the old stuff at massive interest rates
Stop about the Russian aggression, we all know who is the aggressor.
YES ITS THE WEST
Zelensky is reckless.
All of them....lol, wtf war you watching? Ukraine is losing on all fronts.
Even the long range use of the ATACMS is being met with overwhelming firepower.
Let's talk F-16, the wonder weapon.
F 16 is shot down by Indian MIG 21 lol😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Bottom line, Russia was able to eliminate them within weeks after their appearance on battle field.
J-dams ? GPS problem, jammed 😎
👍
Every weapon that was sent to Ukraine worked for a while until Russians adapted. So non off the weapons didn't make any significant difference.
The US & NATO allies with their might still couldn't beat the Taliban's with thier faulty AK 47 and flipflops. After almost 20 years in Afghanistan they left.😅😅😅
" faulty AK 47..." really?
What happened to much touted f16 fighter jets
We need to Quit giving other Countries Money.
Any report is biased when it refers to Russian Aggression. No such talks of Ukraine aggression which caused the war to begin.
Duhhh...who invaded who? How dense can a person be?
@@richard-v8p8c Duhhh..."invade" is used misleadingly, it presumes one party wrong but the other right. The word is aggression. But for Ukraine's aggression, from 2014 onward, Russia would have no need to retaliate. When you are correct, there is no need for personal attacks. Keep it civil!
@@lesliethomas7234 so it isn't aggression when you use your military to cross the border with the mission to overthrow another country and oppress the people of that country? Russia invaded the Crimea and TOOK the land. Then they invaded the Ukraine AGAIN with the goal of taking Kiev in 3 days. Invasion=aggression.
Just like israel, the USA has fallen deeply into the inevitable trap of believing your own hype. Resulting in sever humility when you get your ass handed to you on a plate by a "far inferiour" foe.
PLEASE SUPPORT THE AXIS of RESISTANCE..❤❤❤❤
Don't poke the bear🤣🤣 Most of those American weapons are going to end up in the Scrap yard.
It costs billions of dollars to improve a device, so having cutting-edge devices is impossible.
What failed all of them
American cooperation money launderer.
Failed : patriot and other anti aircraft’s defenses
Abrams
Leopard as well as Amx or challenger
Instead Bradley and stinger or javelin definitely worked
Striker or cv 90 not game changer but not bad
CV 90 and Bradley are most destroy in battlefield
@ nothing is invulnerable
@@filippozoncada3660 ik
Javelin is best anti tank on the planet
@ yeah no doubt
The US weapon systems are not failing; the issue is that Ukrainian soldiers lack sufficient training to use the weapons effectively.
American weapons are operated by American soldiers in Ukraine and they all failed. Stop looking for excuse, it is all scrap of shit.
In regard to manufacturing of military equipment, World War Two proved that big quantity wins over small quantity, even if the latter may be better quality.
And that money didn't come from zelensky pocket but US taxpayers😂😂
1:41 they've given a total of 280 billion. And it all went up and smoke or into their pockets
They don't get money, they get weapons for defence. These weapons have already been produced, and just as Russia is using weapons produced under the Soviet Union, so America is sending weapons produced against the Soviet Union. It is like giving you a car worth $3000. Yes, I contributed $3000, but in reality I got rid of an old car that was rusting in the garage. If Ukraine loses, Western countries will still have to make weapons to defend themselves against Russia. At the same time the battlefield seems to be completely changing and old weapons will not be enough in the future.
NATO's total is almost 750bn right now IIRC.
@@Shyhalupoket money
@@joaquimbelbut4829 cope.
We just spend money; the US has 11 super carriers at a cost so astronomical a person really can't conceive of. As I'm sure everyone knows we "outspend" the world on military stuff and yet no one mentions that we don't have enough of what we actually need. And incidentally, aircraft carriers are obsolete against a peer military. Hell, the Houths control the Red sea and our forces pulled out.
FACT: It doesnt matter how advanced the weapons are, if you fail to deploy/use them properly and/or you lack Troops with sufficient training to make them effective.Reliable, multiple reports of Ukraine being reduced to press ganging civilians off the street into the Military and sending " weekend warrior" Natl Guard Troops to the front lines due to Troop losses are impossible to ignore now.
Are you implying 400K Americans troop deployed to Afghanistan poorly trained like WW1 Russians? There no 400K American troops left the day after that infampus Kabul flee. I have encountered any military officers worldwide in the last 2 years able to opinionated that America won in Afghan...and some of them Amerixan themselves. As for stalemate, only 1 explain that way. The reat all concluded Talevan goatherders in Yoyota decimated Americans. If the weapon sucks, just say so. Complaining troops poorly trained is equally bad if not worse off than saying American weapon is of China made-quality.
@@jameschalkwig787 Lol are you drunk Mahmood?
All american weapon are good only on commercial advertisement🤣
I thought they told us that Russia has been fighting with shovels.
They only do well when the opponent has no air, artillery, Support
why do we the usa citizens have give up our tax money to fight a war in Ukraine 🇺🇦 😂 its fucking sad
All of them
Its US armies operated the hightech cutting edge missiles like Patriot n ATACM.
But failed miserablely.
Shows US wars adversaries losts to fight against Russia capablelities.
No surprise!
US hasn’t fought a peer adversary since WWII.
I wonder who many weapons ended up on the black market and how many dollars ended up in the pockets of Zelensky and his minions. Would be interesting to know.
60%
Himars , ATACMS , F 16 , Russian weapons are better .
For the last year the US has not supplied much equipment and Ukraine has had to rely on EU and UK
These weapons are only any good against a weaker enemy.
western weapons have been touted how advanced they are how good they are (but not how expensive they are) and with media help in missleading possible customers, but in the last couple of years we have seen how bad they really are, one thing for sure it gives countries who are looking to upgrade there weapons to see how they really work and if they do that it is russian weapon systems they will be looking at
There is a german saying: "Wenn man keine Ahnung hat, einfach mal die Fresse halten." I think it fits quiet well here.
It sounds like you are there to dish out REAL information not nuisance propaganda. Thumps up!!
68.5 billion all for what, Putin's still in there, and could be for some time. Sad.
The figure of money spent is perhaps what is how can a shisticated weapons face challenges.
Russia, Ukraine, Britain, EU, US, you are not tired of killing and destroying, and ruining innocent lives, you should think about peace and not about who will bring how many weapons and show his power... Where is your conscience and humanity...
They're not fighting no sheep herders in Afghanistan or Iraq they couldn't defeat them so what you going to do with the near peer but get defeated cuz ain't nothing changed in Iraq Afghanistan nothing but the dis stabilization
That’s why Ukraine is slowly falling down because of incompetence.
The real battle is against CO2.
Without CO2 earth will surely die
Anyone who choose to fight on either side, the battlefield reality is not a walk in the park, the pure devastation of artillery drones and all Military equipment and the exploitation around you. You will piss your pants at some point.
The US only sent about thirty Abrams tanks which were specifically targeted by the enemy forces. Yes, they are dwindling in number but then Australia is sending another 49 Abrams as we speak. They are far superior to Russian tanks
I think is not eighter the arrow or the arch but the native. I believe that the best is Donald Trump stops this madness. Every army will have the territory these have in that moment,.
Cliff notes: all of them
Caesar big win unlike all other howitzers
Most sent have already been destroyed months ago
@ source: trust me bro
Short answer : all of them.
Russiasuper,,, uraniumfull
Free tech to Russia. No need to pay royalties !😂😂😂
All I can say at this time is, it is impossible for Keiv to counter Moscow just with US Weaponary, the Russians are masterminds in their tactics and they know the terrain like the Americans don't, without the direct involvement of the US and NATO, the Russian Federation will take Ukraine one fine day. As American it is hard to accept this, but its the truth.
western mbts - too heavy, too intricate, too delicate, too expensive - one just cant afford to field as many as one like or as frequently desired in a protracted conflict
again like Gen. Shephard(OG) from COD MW 2 said "sure they got the biggest stick but what matters is helluva lot who is swinging"
Ukraine got awesome and powerful Tanks, Cannons, Missiles and Jets but they still get cooked by Russians despite their losses.....Russians may lost 1000s of Tanks and Jets but Ukraine's tech are more important than Russia and they lost heavy than Russians
No weapons are powerful unless tested in battlefield
Russia has lost approx 30 tank
Zapad nastavlja igre sopstvenim glavama.
Military weapons Graveyard 😅😅😅 usa 🇺🇸 weapons are over rated 😅
"Advanced weapons" my you know what......
I would be more concerned about Russia`s BRAND NEW hardware being obliterated than old 30 / 40 year old NATO stock .... its a bit embarrassing !
لابد ان يعلم الجميع ان الروسي يعتبر آلة حرب لا يقهر بسهولة .
it's all about trying to figure out if the defense weapons and offense weapons are better than Russia,North Korea and Iran that's y we r spending billions of dollars.
US weapons work on counter that can’t defend themselves like Irak Syria Libya and Afghanistan
I think Ukraine will not gain any edge in these conflicts..
begging for cutting edge weapons is not a good way to fight a war talkless winning! Am I the only one seeing this play out??? this is a PSA to zelensky, save what is left before there is nothing left!
stop the war
American weapons are over hyped, they keep failing in Ukraine and Israel
Just tell the truth!!
Strašné čo si tí amici odtrhli od úst len aby
If the main brain is not in controle who will go on with this stuped war
Garbish in garbish out .
This war is about weapons the best Wil have billions worth of orders all will buy the best.
Putin the great ❤❤
US weapons are best used against 3rd class standing armies. US has never won a war, regardless.
Russians vs Russians.
Too little, too weak
But wen North Korea help Russia it's problem to Europe and America 😂
Most classes of weapons were very disappointing in this war. Once again the rule is confirmed - in a real large-scale war, simple, mass, cheap and universal weapons win. Such classes as tanks, air defense, and aviation after the Second World War became more and more expensive, more complex, fewer in number and more narrowly specialized, and when it comes to Western models, this is exacerbated even more. Patriot air defense - terribly expensive missiles, few in number, difficult to master by personnel, ineffective against ballistic missiles - as a result - low air defense density over a large territory - low efficiency in general. Abrams tank - high cost, few in number, poor unification with other equipment, narrow specialization is often unnecessary - lack of high-explosive fragmentation ammunition - as a result, practically useless in combat
On the other hand, there are also good examples and innovations, especially where civilian products are adapted or where Russia has no analogues. The M2 Bradley has proven itself as an idea for a well-protected infantry fighting vehicle, while its Russian counterpart, the Kurganets-25, was not popular before the war. The Rochelle Senator, an armored car based on a civilian car, has proven itself very well - simple and very numerous
Ukraine is doing harakiri and US is promoting it
😂😂American weapons superiority exists only against Afghan, Iraqis peasant soldiers.