@@kevinwebster7868that is not true. The raw image data is the exact same as this, but without hues, they are black and white. Sometimes they have to do some clean up if the image is a stitch or made from multiple/super long exposures, but that does not entail creative freedom, its just data processing. The only freedom they have on processing these images is the colours they assign, since there isn't really a right or wrong way to display invisible wavelengths of light. The colours are usually picked depending on the science goals, to highlight contrasts and let specific traits intuitively stand out. For example colouring hydrogen emission spectras in a contrasting hue to everything else to study its distribution more easily. On top of that, the colours chosen might also just be for aesthetic reasons if a certain release is used for public outreach. All the raw data is available to you at all times regardless, so you can do the image processing yourself. You will find that the shapes and distributions of objects and matter will be perfectly in line with what they show here. stop spreading misinformation
JWST only creates black and white images based on the frequencies of light which the researchers' have selected. The beautiful color images are created by a specialist who assigns a color to each frequency: e.g. hydrogen is blue, etc. for the public. (cf Fraser Cain's interview with the image colonization specialist.)
@@Scooterdude01 Given the number of views, likes and comments Fraser Cain's video received there are thousands of people who are interested in how this marvel of American technology works and the process by which b&w images are turned into "pricesless" (sic) images.
@@hammah6358 My mom and just a feeling inside. I really believe when we die we turn into beings of light with the ability to travel the universe and see all creations.
Is it any wonder we have religion and the idea of God when there would have been no light pollution back then. I wish with all my heart that we could have a worldwide dark day and see the beauty that is beyond our planet.
With all the sick division and hatred going on in the world right now, it’s good to see stuff like this and remember humans really are still capable of real beauty and amazing potential.
actually, every single blob is a galaxy in the last image. When webb takes images, nearby foreground stars have diffraction spikes. everything that doesn't have those spikes or at least a small pattern, is likely a galaxy, as a rule of thumb. Doesn't always hold true, depending on the image and the way it was captured, but most of the time its a decent way to distinguish galaxies from stars In this image here, there are hundreds of imaged galaxies. Now keep in mind just how tiny of a space the image actually covers in the night sky
AMAZING US TECHNOLOGRY - WE NEED TO SEE MORE JWT RESULTS .... and Instead of 'Just Pictures' ...FOR A CHANGE, WE'D LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THE PICS REALLY MEAN --- THE TECH RESULTS.
I think it's just me, but the closer you get to this nebula it doesn't look like a horse's head. It looks like a headless man. A headless horseman! 😱🤯😁😆 Great images though. Well done, NASA and JWST👍👍🤘🤘
The James Webb telescope - a highly technical, extremely expensive and serious piece of information and scientific data gathering equipment… has a star filter on it.
The telescope has over 30 different imaging modes and filters, thats kind of the point. If you are referring to the diffraction spikes on bright objects (not just stars), those are optical defects caused by the hexagonal mirrors and the struts that hold up the secondary mirror. Hubble had a similar defect, and its easy to tell images of the two apart by seeing the hexagonal spikes (and the smaller strike throgh bar) from webb, or the 4 sided cross caused by hubbles struts. You can't really get around having these, if something is in the way of your target, it will cause image defects. The more precise the image, the more pronounced the defects. This is the exact same principle that causes lense flares in camera lenses, or streaks on the retina of your eye when you overexpose either.
A star filter is a piece of etched glass that is added to a camera lens to refract bright light in a star pattern to add drama to a scene. Many varieties exist. These days star filter effects are usually added in Photoshop - if at all. The effect is a bit tired, so you don’t see it much anymore. But if you ARE going to use it, where better to use it than on, you know, stars!
The true understanding of the end: It is the total knowledge of the beginning ההבנה האמיתית של הסוף: זוהי הידע הכולל של ההתחלה A verdadeira compreensão do fim: é o conhecimento total do começo
@@Ethan_Roberts you delusional miscreant. NASA admits they generated the imagery to ‘represent’ what they ‘believe’ exists. A one minute search on YT and you’ll find it.
@@TheRealRennthey never said that. You're taking the process out of context to suit your narrative. I do astro processing, you do not, you're in no position to say what is and isn't real
The amount of galaxies in the background of that small patch of space behind it 😮💨
Yea it never ends. Goes on indefinitely.
😪
🤯
Seriously 😳
Holy moly those are galaxies???
We are definetly not alone.
My God, it’s full of galaxies!!!
It took so long for us to have this wonderful piece of machinery up there but now we can see things clearer and farther and farther away!!! 🔭
Seeing those distant background galaxies literally made my jaw drop.
The universe is a pretty big place, for sure! 😁😁
We are all so tiny when compared to the universe which is constantly expanding at a rate faster than the speed of light.
I wonder what’s the name of their gods in those individual galaxies.🤔
You know it doesn’t actually look like that right? These are interpretations of what is imaged. In the actual image they are just fuzzy dots of light
@@kevinwebster7868that is not true. The raw image data is the exact same as this, but without hues, they are black and white. Sometimes they have to do some clean up if the image is a stitch or made from multiple/super long exposures, but that does not entail creative freedom, its just data processing.
The only freedom they have on processing these images is the colours they assign, since there isn't really a right or wrong way to display invisible wavelengths of light. The colours are usually picked depending on the science goals, to highlight contrasts and let specific traits intuitively stand out. For example colouring hydrogen emission spectras in a contrasting hue to everything else to study its distribution more easily. On top of that, the colours chosen might also just be for aesthetic reasons if a certain release is used for public outreach.
All the raw data is available to you at all times regardless, so you can do the image processing yourself. You will find that the shapes and distributions of objects and matter will be perfectly in line with what they show here.
stop spreading misinformation
I can't help wondering what these amazing galaxies etc would actually look like to eye. Very cool all the same.
It's just crazy if you think how much life there must be, seeing all those galaxies in just that tiny area of space.
Looking at this one wonders how there can only be life, as we know it, on planet Earth.
10 billion over budget, 10 years behind schedule. Pictures like this, priceless.
JWST only creates black and white images based on the frequencies of light which the researchers' have selected. The beautiful color images are created by a specialist who assigns a color to each frequency: e.g. hydrogen is blue, etc. for the public. (cf Fraser Cain's interview with the image colonization specialist.)
@@douglaswilkinson5700 well Dougie know one gives a flying s..t
@@Scooterdude01 Given the number of views, likes and comments Fraser Cain's video received there are thousands of people who are interested in how this marvel of American technology works and the process by which b&w images are turned into "pricesless" (sic) images.
There are some things money can't buy. For everything else, there's The James Webb Space Telescope 😊😁😆
Totally humbled.
Beautiful & incredible image!
Stunning galaxy’s, endless amazement, and not enough time in this life to explore it all.
Prepare for the afterlife you’ll have all the time you need
@@TheWavvy1 how would you know D.A
@@hammah6358 My mom and just a feeling inside. I really believe when we die we turn into beings of light with the ability to travel the universe and see all creations.
@@TheWavvy1 if only that was true, then i would have something to look forward to
@@hammah6358 What will you do during the black hole era of the Universe?
It’s so so pretty ❤❤
If there was only a way to boldly go exploring that part of the universe...I'd be the first to sign up...stunning detail in this...
Just unbelievable- the zoom, the beauty, the background
Is it any wonder we have religion and the idea of God when there would have been no light pollution back then. I wish with all my heart that we could have a worldwide dark day and see the beauty that is beyond our planet.
@Kx0195. That's a great idea.
With all the sick division and hatred going on in the world right now, it’s good to see stuff like this and remember humans really are still capable of real beauty and amazing potential.
Unbelievable how great❤
Wonderful ! Thanks.
Beautiful.
Brilliant
Looks more like dragon than horse 🐥
My great aunt discovered the Horse Head Nebula in 1888 off of glass plates! We’ve come a long way…
Now that is an impressive pedigree! 🙂
So beautiful yet so unforgiving
Heavenly.
Goosebumps ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Gracias por el vídeo, buen aporte para la ciencia, saludos cordiales 😊
Unreal!
Using our technology to view creation pretty cool
lol "creation" 😆
Looks like a sea horse at first...amazing!
Impressive!
Wow!
Closest thing to light speed travel. Love it. I went to the Horsehead Nebula without ever leaving my recliner. Noice.
The camera man was moving fast weren't they?
It's only a tiny portion! I was so hoping to see the whole thing.
I’m sure I’m not the only one to have noticed but if you zoom in at the end there is a clear galaxy it’s so amazing how big this place
actually, every single blob is a galaxy in the last image. When webb takes images, nearby foreground stars have diffraction spikes. everything that doesn't have those spikes or at least a small pattern, is likely a galaxy, as a rule of thumb. Doesn't always hold true, depending on the image and the way it was captured, but most of the time its a decent way to distinguish galaxies from stars
In this image here, there are hundreds of imaged galaxies. Now keep in mind just how tiny of a space the image actually covers in the night sky
Realy I like this video so so its interestyng
According to my math, you could fit about 25 solar systems end to end in this frame. (.8 ly=8,000,000,000,000 km/~300,000,000 km. -Source, Wikipedia)
Many Nebulas...into the Spaces...😮🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Wow. That’s significantly better than what my Seestar S50 can capture 😂
Oh my God! It’s a wave!? What pushes it? Gravity wave? I am stunned. So cool…
AMAZING US TECHNOLOGRY - WE NEED TO SEE MORE JWT RESULTS .... and Instead of 'Just Pictures' ...FOR A CHANGE, WE'D LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THE PICS REALLY MEAN --- THE TECH RESULTS.
❤
Take me there 😊
What WONDERFUL UNIVERSE 🌐👍🐱💭💭💭
And introducing the horses headless manana
I waith for 55 years 4k picture from Moon.!😢 Is so near.
Betcha' there's coffee in that nebula.
I think it's just me, but the closer you get to this nebula it doesn't look like a horse's head. It looks like a headless man. A headless horseman! 😱🤯😁😆
Great images though. Well done, NASA and JWST👍👍🤘🤘
Wait!! What kind of horse is that suppose to be?😮
Wow. Absolutely incredible.
And coming up right behind it ready to mount is... the John Wayne Nebula! That's right, pilgrim.
I don’t think the music is spacey enough. It’s definitely needing some more reverb and water droplets in the background.
ET face..😮
Subhan Allah
The James Webb telescope - a highly technical, extremely expensive and serious piece of information and scientific data gathering equipment… has a star filter on it.
The telescope has over 30 different imaging modes and filters, thats kind of the point.
If you are referring to the diffraction spikes on bright objects (not just stars), those are optical defects caused by the hexagonal mirrors and the struts that hold up the secondary mirror.
Hubble had a similar defect, and its easy to tell images of the two apart by seeing the hexagonal spikes (and the smaller strike throgh bar) from webb, or the 4 sided cross caused by hubbles struts.
You can't really get around having these, if something is in the way of your target, it will cause image defects. The more precise the image, the more pronounced the defects. This is the exact same principle that causes lense flares in camera lenses, or streaks on the retina of your eye when you overexpose either.
A star filter is a piece of etched glass that is added to a camera lens to refract bright light in a star pattern to add drama to a scene. Many varieties exist. These days star filter effects are usually added in Photoshop - if at all. The effect is a bit tired, so you don’t see it much anymore. But if you ARE going to use it, where better to use it than on, you know, stars!
@@waitsbatriani interesting, i never knew. Well webbs diffraction pattern doesn't come from a filter, as stated xD
Ya ALLAH 🌙zrr shm drna suna khsta hrse jr kri
Macbeth
The true understanding of the end: It is the total knowledge of the beginning
ההבנה האמיתית של הסוף: זוהי הידע הכולל של ההתחלה
A verdadeira compreensão do fim: é o conhecimento total do começo
Gee I wonder what the backside of the Moon looks like
webb sadly cannot look at the moon, but for that we have the LRO, which has mapped the entire moon in ultra high definition.
😅😅😅😅well information good show 😅😅😅
A bit squeaky for a nebula.
that's where I stash my adult magazines
Just once I would like to see a visible light image without the enhancements.
ALLAH O AKBAR❤❤
Aliens 100% exist
Ya great. Now show what it really saw instead of the artist interpretation. The actual images are far more telling.
The actual images are black and white, this here is much better suited for demonstration purposes than the unprocessed raw data.
What is the deferent of huble and james weeb? There no special i think
James Webb is is an "infrared" space telescope and Hubble is a mainly "visible light."
Did you watch the video?
@@nexpro6985 I watch video Weeb and hubble.there no special what I expected..
You've been living under a rock, maybe?
You need to do a comparison. Seeing what's behind these clouds of gas is so incredibly important.
لا اله الا الله
Allah hu Akber
God is amazing
That music. Just awful.
ZERO % chance this is real photos in any way. guarenteed it's just artists "imagination" of what they are "looking at".
These are real, not understanding image processing doesn't make them fake
@@Ethan_Roberts you delusional miscreant. NASA admits they generated the imagery to ‘represent’ what they ‘believe’ exists. A one minute search on YT and you’ll find it.
@@TheRealRennthey never said that. You're taking the process out of context to suit your narrative. I do astro processing, you do not, you're in no position to say what is and isn't real
Colorized and computer generated
And to think that we are alone! it is only a matter of when we will be found, or when we will find others
Big deal