What happened to ball tanks? - Kugelpanzer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 388

  • @FoundAndExplained
    @FoundAndExplained  5 місяців тому +50

    Obviously the channel exists thanks to Square Space, so if you do need a site, please do click my referal link for 10% off your first site and domain + 14 day free trial!
    www.squarespace.com/found

    • @SpConstructionSite
      @SpConstructionSite 5 місяців тому +1

      ❤❤❤

    • @keeganpretorius847
      @keeganpretorius847 5 місяців тому

      Quick question why do you stream your videos to upload to UA-cam I've seen other creators doing this aswell.

    • @doozydude4209
      @doozydude4209 5 місяців тому +3

      You should do a video about Die Glocke (German: [diː ˈɡlɔkə], 'The Bell') it was a purported top-secret scientific technological device, wonder weapon, or Wunderwaffe developed in the 1940s in Nazi Germany.

    • @gabrielb9010
      @gabrielb9010 5 місяців тому

      @@keeganpretorius847 that's called a premiere

    • @aerostarsreal
      @aerostarsreal 5 місяців тому

      the next video is an MD-12

  • @evill01
    @evill01 5 місяців тому +229

    My guess is it was designed in between 1920-1933 in order to contravene Treaty of Versailles because you could argue that it isn't a real tank, but when the bad guys took over they disregarded the treaty completely and simply designed real tanks.

  • @smharmon21
    @smharmon21 3 місяці тому +92

    U.S. Army tanker here for a decade. My thoughts: The major issue with this vehicle will be the amount of pressure per square inch it would put on the ground. Imagine it on concrete. All that weight would rest on a only a few square inches. It would sink in mud or even earth and would strugle to go anywhere, always having to climb "up hill" from the perspective of each "wheel" sinking in. Ground pressure for U.S. armored mechanized vehicles generally sits between 5-15 PSI. An average male, standing on one foot, produces 5 PSI for instance. Whoever made this "tank" would have soon realized it bogged down immediately. Virtually unusable. No way an engine that size could have taken it anywhere but up and down a reinforced concrete motorpool. It most certainly would have been a terrible "scouting vehicle" and I doubt it could have survived against even light machine guns.

    • @6TDOW66
      @6TDOW66 3 місяці тому +7

      Also, no suspension

    • @AayYoWhatUp
      @AayYoWhatUp 2 місяці тому

      *BALL*

    • @PissyKnish
      @PissyKnish 2 місяці тому

      Shut up, nerd.

    • @refindoazhar1507
      @refindoazhar1507 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@6TDOW66cool, free LBP for every driver.

    • @GS-XV
      @GS-XV 10 днів тому

      I think you don't realize how small this thing is - it's just a bit taller than a person sitting on a chair. You can easily build this thing well under a metric ton, even 0.5 tons - it's only 5mm armour and 1 cylinder engine. A regular petrol car is 1.5 tons and an EV is 2.5 tons and they don't have a problem with even less tire area in contact with the ground. And US armored vehicles are in the 50-70 ton range.
      The biggest problem with this kugelpanzer will be stability - each time this thing tries to stop it will want to continue rolling forward 😂

  • @Chris-ok4zo
    @Chris-ok4zo 5 місяців тому +438

    OK, who gave Pac-Man a full suit of plate armor?

    • @VunderGuy
      @VunderGuy 5 місяців тому +14

      Noseferatu.

    • @ContemplativeCat
      @ContemplativeCat 5 місяців тому +26

      Pac-Man: Metal Gear Solid.

    • @MonkBannana
      @MonkBannana 5 місяців тому +12

      At least it isn't plot armor

    • @RextheDragon881
      @RextheDragon881 5 місяців тому +6

      Comment of the day award

    • @poil8351
      @poil8351 5 місяців тому +6

      but pac man likes to eat his enemies like kirby.

  • @rsookchand919
    @rsookchand919 5 місяців тому +300

    Ball tank detected. Deploying Giant Ronaldo

  • @poodlescone9700
    @poodlescone9700 5 місяців тому +144

    It is probably a WW1 leftover. The design is so flawed the testers probably figured it out during testing and abandoned the project. This would explain the lack of documentation and the similarity of design to the era.

    • @aarondavidlopezdegante7884
      @aarondavidlopezdegante7884 3 місяці тому +4

      tbh yeah, if i had done such an horrendus work i would burn the documentation. Like a sequel of a good movie thhat we pretend the sequel doesnt exist

  • @christmassnow3465
    @christmassnow3465 5 місяців тому +39

    This raises the question why they are still secretive about such technology considered obsolete nowadays.

    • @AllanMogensen
      @AllanMogensen 5 місяців тому

      They copy the technology for their war in Ukraine ;) They don´t want to reveal any military secrets

    • @patrickstewart3446
      @patrickstewart3446 5 місяців тому +22

      Probably because there are parts inside stamped in Cyrillic letters that read “Made in Soviet Union.”
      😁

    • @lordraptor11
      @lordraptor11 4 місяці тому

      @@patrickstewart3446 i agree the crude nature clearly screams made in soviet union from junk left lying around.

  • @CapitalTeeth
    @CapitalTeeth 5 місяців тому +40

    I have another theory. Namely that it was designed just after WW1, when Germany was ridden with the Versailles Treaty, which forbid them from having tanks or an airforce. During this period they tried a lot of things to find any sort of loophole to the treaty, testing new designs in foreign countries under fake names like "Light Tractor". This Kugelpanzer could be among the earliest of them.

    • @christiandeuer2425
      @christiandeuer2425 5 місяців тому +10

      The most logical theory from all of them.

    • @andreassehburger4308
      @andreassehburger4308 5 місяців тому +6

      And the germans tested their early tank types in this period of time before WW2 in Russia.

  • @PYROWORKSTV
    @PYROWORKSTV 5 місяців тому +107

    English speaking people be like: I can't pronounce ö, ü or ä
    Also English speaking people: Kügelpänzer lol

    • @bjorntorlarsson
      @bjorntorlarsson 5 місяців тому

      Many native English speaker play stupid. They do use many foreign letter sounds everyday. ö as in "a". ä as in apple. A sound they cannot pronounce is "u", or "ü". U is the shape of the tounge. Many don't have rolling r either. Poor tounge articulation, need to train that muscle. Improves kissing too.

    • @alm5992
      @alm5992 5 місяців тому +9

      @@Gurumeierhans You should hear different first language people try and speak English- they butcher it too lol!

    • @aaftiyoDkcdicurak
      @aaftiyoDkcdicurak 5 місяців тому

      ​@@alphadawg81 how is it not obvious that he's talking about people outside of Europe 🤦‍♂️

    • @lordraptor11
      @lordraptor11 4 місяці тому

      funny thin is panzer is pronounced pantser LOL

    • @Espadaejecutora
      @Espadaejecutora 3 місяці тому

      Así es Ñ

  • @S1337theoddoneout-ip9xc
    @S1337theoddoneout-ip9xc 5 місяців тому +70

    That tumbleweed tank looks straight out of fall out. I can see myself running around the wasteland looking for Shaun on one of those.

    • @Russia_lion17
      @Russia_lion17 5 місяців тому +6

      Oh most definetly😂

    • @MarkPereira-jz4ct
      @MarkPereira-jz4ct 4 місяці тому +2

      Psh the way power armor eats cores this thing would last 2 min per core 😂😅😂

    • @Pillar_of_Salt
      @Pillar_of_Salt 3 місяці тому +1

      @@MarkPereira-jz4ct The cores used to be nearly infinite until Bethesda got ahold of the IP

  • @christopherlee627
    @christopherlee627 5 місяців тому +30

    Given that it was found in Manchuria, it seems odd that there's no speculation that it was actually a Japanese project.

    • @avus-kw2f213
      @avus-kw2f213 5 місяців тому +14

      That would explain the lack of documentation
      I’m pretty sure the Japanese destroyed most the documents at the end of the war
      Or
      Or
      It’s actually from the Qing empire and they invented the tank

    • @christopherlee627
      @christopherlee627 5 місяців тому

      @@avus-kw2f213 I actually suspect that it was one of the forgotten projects of the diabolical Dr. Fu Manchu.

    • @pacificostudios
      @pacificostudios 5 місяців тому +6

      See my comment above. Japanese forces experimented with one-man tanks in the 1930s, including one where a man CRAWLED on the ground under an armor-plated cover. The Kugelpanzer is more advanced than that.

  • @funzario144
    @funzario144 3 місяці тому +3

    The Orc army in Warhammer 40k is always thankful for such inspirations.

  • @raywest3834
    @raywest3834 5 місяців тому +25

    Ball tank would be totally useless on all but ideal terrain. Surprised it made it beyond the looney idea stage.

    • @asdf9890
      @asdf9890 5 місяців тому +5

      It is ridiculous 😂. I think the little back wheel is there so if the tracks get stuck, the compartment doesn’t spin like a clothes dyer.

  • @x5x
    @x5x 5 місяців тому +88

    The Soviets/Russians do not let you look inside of it, there is only one in Kubinka. Maybe it is a something the Soviets come up for the Museum?

    • @nacly4654
      @nacly4654 5 місяців тому +7

      that can be debunked if there are records before the museum was built in 1972.

    • @alm5992
      @alm5992 5 місяців тому +19

      Kubinka is already the craziest tank museum, though. They have the only Maus and some others with only one model left. It feels strange that they would need a fake vehicle to bolster visitors; though I can't say why they are so secretive about it.

    • @WatermelonDog202
      @WatermelonDog202 5 місяців тому +10

      ​@@alm5992Imagine Hitler was inside of it 😳

    • @PaperThinArmor
      @PaperThinArmor 5 місяців тому +8

      Maybe the reason why they cant let people look inside it cause theres some sort of contaminate in it similar to how the T14 heavy in bovington had a radiation warning from leaking indicators which prevented people from going inside.

    • @justsomehaatonpassingby4488
      @justsomehaatonpassingby4488 5 місяців тому +6

      ​@@PaperThinArmor probably... I think Asbestos would be the thing inside this ball tank, since asbestos is used in ww2 as a fire shield

  • @alankeith7866
    @alankeith7866 5 місяців тому +7

    I'm actually working on that model kit right now... I am taking a little creative license about this vehicle though. I'm also making it into a small diorama, setting it as an abandoned vehicle. Thanks for this video!!!

    • @aaftiyoDkcdicurak
      @aaftiyoDkcdicurak 5 місяців тому

      I think you have the creative license to put anything other than Lazer guns on it seeing how experimental they were.

  • @lighthousegravyP51
    @lighthousegravyP51 5 місяців тому +65

    Found and Explained: "Let's never talk about the hopping tanks again."
    Me: *talks about the hopping tank😅"

  • @embo4887
    @embo4887 5 місяців тому +12

    I wonder if it was a prewar prototype then they just used it as like an entrance display coming into the proving grounds like they do here in the US. Like Grissom AFB has two super sabres at the entrance.

  • @woodchild2093
    @woodchild2093 5 місяців тому +5

    I'm a scale model builder and have built a few of these. Cool to see a video about them

  • @GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
    @GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 5 місяців тому +20

    I mean that thing looks like it'll get stuck all the time, and knocked over easily.

    • @pegcity4eva
      @pegcity4eva 5 місяців тому +1

      A light breeze lol

    • @TrueFork
      @TrueFork 5 місяців тому +2

      looks more like something intended for use in an environmental hazard lab setting than battlefields

    • @asdf9890
      @asdf9890 4 місяці тому

      Imagine the wheels getting stuck and the middle part just spins around and around 😂

  • @pacificostudios
    @pacificostudios 5 місяців тому +6

    What is the evidence that it wasn't a Japanese prototype? The Japanese Army experimented with one man tanks years before 1941. Chinese armies lacked many anti-tank weapons or good tanks of their own. As a system for wiping out enemy machine guns, etc., this might have worked well in the 1930s.

    • @jacksontorres839
      @jacksontorres839 5 місяців тому +1

      That’s a good theory. Japanese tank doctrine was focused on light tanks with relatively light armaments, mostly for anti personnel roles, although they had some landing craft/tank destroyers for defense near the end of the war.

  • @bwilliams463
    @bwilliams463 5 місяців тому +2

    The lower tread profile of the Mark ! tank was based on the curvature of a wheel that had been calculated as the ideal size to cross a standard WW1 trench.

  • @IAmTheAce5
    @IAmTheAce5 5 місяців тому +50

    Wonder-waffles are no match for Belgian waffles!!

    • @Battlemode-l9p
      @Battlemode-l9p 5 місяців тому +2

      You say so

    • @mrbad3036
      @mrbad3036 5 місяців тому +2

      😂😂😂

    • @chrisfallis5851
      @chrisfallis5851 3 місяці тому

      Obviously part of the Waffle - SS.

    • @GarC170
      @GarC170 2 місяці тому

      They both waffled in the end I suppose

  • @sadisbhack
    @sadisbhack 5 місяців тому +7

    Its nice to see a UA-cam video come out.

  • @IdenticXP
    @IdenticXP 5 місяців тому +15

    Walked around that thing in Kubinka a few years ago, still scratching my head about it..

  • @metaplante
    @metaplante 5 місяців тому +16

    As a writer, I always say that there are 101 possible origins and/or outcomes to any story.
    It could simply be a project improvised by the Russians, at the beginning of the war, captured by the Germans, who decided to use it for their own needs before being taken back by the Russians...
    And for that, reconnaissance, the deployment of telephone cables and messaging suit him well.

  • @SoloTURK11
    @SoloTURK11 5 місяців тому +7

    0:57 ah yes… a wonderwaffle

    • @sforza209
      @sforza209 2 місяці тому

      Hahaha gotta love wonderwaffles. Extra syrup.

  • @testerjs
    @testerjs 5 місяців тому +11

    I want Droidekas up here at once!
    Where are those Droidekas?
    (First thought when i saw this video.)

  • @stcredzero
    @stcredzero 5 місяців тому +6

    If you make the wheel/track part bigger, it's just like a tank from Star Wars!

    • @alm5992
      @alm5992 5 місяців тому +3

      Oh wow, the "persuader" droid tank? It does look like that.

  • @russbilzing5348
    @russbilzing5348 2 місяці тому

    According to the drawings that you showed, it used a 4 cylinder, air cooled, Porsche derived engine remarkably similar, if not identical, to the ones used in the Kugelwagon und Schwimmwagon during the war.

  • @tolik5929
    @tolik5929 5 місяців тому +1

    It coud have been some sort of engioneering vehicle . Not meant for combat , but perhaps for use by sappers and engioneers , to help clear areas of booy traps , etc. It would offer some protection from explosions . Trip wire grenades , etc.

  • @ludovisuis
    @ludovisuis 5 місяців тому +2

    If it was supposedely found in Manchuria, which was a Japanese-occupied territory in current Northern China, why ruling out the possibility that it was simply a Japanese-made vehicle, and having nothing to do with Germany?

  • @lonwof2105
    @lonwof2105 5 місяців тому +2

    Those ball tanks might be a good way to provide garrison force multipliers. That dumb shape and track style would probably be best used in city streets. Most resistance folks wouldn't have had anything more than a pistol. Those little ball tanks would be able to suppress most resistance actions.

  • @AymenAymen-w5m
    @AymenAymen-w5m 5 місяців тому +1

    The certainty is that the wheel design is successful across various types of terrain. When someone applied this wheel design to a vehicle, it enabled that vehicle to traverse all kinds of terrain

  • @warhawkjah
    @warhawkjah 5 місяців тому +5

    An up-armored version of Mr. Garrison’s invention.

    • @aaftiyoDkcdicurak
      @aaftiyoDkcdicurak 5 місяців тому +1

      😂 hopefully it doesn't have the same controls.

    • @Derpy1969
      @Derpy1969 5 місяців тому

      Beats flying!

  • @tonic8945
    @tonic8945 5 місяців тому +5

    That looked like a VW flat four in the diagram.

    • @david-hf3dk
      @david-hf3dk 3 місяці тому

      Exactly what I thought.

  • @thingamabob3902
    @thingamabob3902 5 місяців тому +7

    The 1500ton Ratte would have had assigned 2 of the Kugelpanzer at all times .... you know, its Balls ^^

    • @aleisterlavey9716
      @aleisterlavey9716 5 місяців тому +1

      "How much do you have to compensate? "
      Hitler: "yes"

    • @sheep1ewe
      @sheep1ewe 5 місяців тому

      Those are zubehör for the Elefant gun... Frontrunners...

  • @charleshotchkiss1813
    @charleshotchkiss1813 5 місяців тому +1

    Churchill proposed something very similar for attacking the Atlantic wall. It failed miserably in field testing.

  • @Samuelhail-ye9er
    @Samuelhail-ye9er 5 місяців тому +8

    This is some star wars tech

    • @suus01
      @suus01 5 місяців тому +3

      fr this is like the early prototype for general grievous' sick one wheel bike.

  • @LupoSenpai
    @LupoSenpai 5 місяців тому +3

    Armed with 2 AT guns
    *shows AT gun and machine gun*
    not to mention the design is probably symmertrical so it has 2 machine guns and one cannon

  • @IONIQver2pointO
    @IONIQver2pointO 5 місяців тому +3

    0:15 Skyros when it's raiding your beacon with Theseus skill:

  • @KemGreene-c7p
    @KemGreene-c7p 2 місяці тому

    "The first Tie fighter with plucked off wings"! also a great photo of the Jawas land cruiser too"!

  • @jasonking2218
    @jasonking2218 3 місяці тому

    Probably a prototype used as a demonstrator for a government contract and was rejected,it still happens today with the big defence contractors making fully sized mock ups

  • @lianglonglong
    @lianglonglong 5 місяців тому +2

    The picture at 9:50 is of a German, Japanese and two finnish officers at the captured city of Äänislinna (russian: petroskoi)

  • @barrywood7234
    @barrywood7234 5 місяців тому

    Kugelblitz was so named because it's Mark 4 chassis had a rotating turret with a rounded top housing 2 anti- aircraft guns. The turrets top had a ball shape housing for these 2 guns

  • @byzmack1334
    @byzmack1334 5 місяців тому +1

    If we could get a sample of the metal we could probably narrow down when it was made and maybe even in which country.

  • @hughmccabe3385
    @hughmccabe3385 5 місяців тому +18

    Maybe the Kugelpanzerr is actually one of the Soviets prototypes that they're masquerading as a German project.
    Wasn't there a soviet ball tank concept, the Sharotank during WW2?

    • @AntonDVasiliev-ss1ie
      @AntonDVasiliev-ss1ie 4 місяці тому

      i can't find any info about that one except from model kits, all i know it was once featured in WoT as event exclusive vehicle

    • @lordraptor11
      @lordraptor11 4 місяці тому

      @@AntonDVasiliev-ss1ie i remember that even from riggedgaming world of riggedbattles

  • @theBlankScroll
    @theBlankScroll 5 місяців тому +1

    "it's already too late, it is running away"

  • @TheLoneWolfling
    @TheLoneWolfling 5 місяців тому +3

    Let's see:
    Utterly useless in non-flat terrain, silhouette well above the main gun meaning that others can shoot at you before you can shoot at them, prone to overturning at any speed, what speed lol, terrible armor slopes...
    Yeah, that sounds about right for prototypes that never got out of the prototype phase.

  • @jonsi3559
    @jonsi3559 5 місяців тому +1

    Watching this the thought struck me that perhaps it came from the Kama Tank school and the Russians have been so hesitant to let anyone examine it as to not bring attention to the fact that they cooperated with Germany.
    There's probably something that can easily debunk it but despite reading quite a bit about the Kugel I've never seen anyone make or disprove a connection to Kama.
    Regardless I don't buy the official explanation of it being a reconnaissance vehicle for a second when it only has a single tiny slit to see out of and is so slow, the complete opposite of what a recon vehicle usually is. Really any sort of front line duty seems exceptionally unlikely when the armor (assuming the reported thickness is correct) would only protect against light shrapnel and even rifle caliber weapons can penetrate it. In my mind it is a Russian built fake until proven otherwise.

  • @RichardChave-xl9yw
    @RichardChave-xl9yw 5 місяців тому +1

    Only the nazis could have invented the Daleks 20 years before Terry Nation. The irony is that Terry created them based on his experiences fighting Tiger Tanks in the Boccage in the weeks after D-Day.

  • @charlessupp2543
    @charlessupp2543 3 місяці тому

    Remember Black Hawk in the comics? The "War Wheel"!😊

  • @SargonKhaled
    @SargonKhaled 5 місяців тому +1

    Kugelpanzer, one of the interesting ball tank that used for defence I really like that ball tank

  • @AllanMogensen
    @AllanMogensen 5 місяців тому +1

    I actually thought of tumbleweed - and then suddenly it was there! :)

  • @meetoo594
    @meetoo594 5 місяців тому +1

    I would have put the larger span of the tracks on the bottom, not top. That thing looks like it would tip over very easily.
    As for its use? Im going with mobile command post or cable layer although a conventional armoured vehicle would do the job better. Probably why theres only 1.

  • @asdf9890
    @asdf9890 5 місяців тому

    Thanks, I was looking for info on these silly contraptions a couple months ago.

  • @serpentinious7745
    @serpentinious7745 5 місяців тому +2

    Option C: some drunk farmer's side project

  • @drifter4training
    @drifter4training 5 місяців тому +1

    this contraception was similarly shown in justice league animated series (DCAU) in WW2 episodes

  • @palerider7171
    @palerider7171 5 місяців тому

    If it was an actual German design, a scout car is probable, maybe a command car so officers could observe forward positions safe from small arms fire, a courier vehicle especially urban warfare to allow protection between positions for messages, rearming pined down positions, lastly and escape pod for high level officers trapped at a position.

  • @ambilysajan818
    @ambilysajan818 5 місяців тому +5

    Waiting for premier to start. Would love to know what the hell a "ball tank" is

    • @gabrielb9010
      @gabrielb9010 5 місяців тому +2

      It's Exactly what it sounds like

    • @bjorntorlarsson
      @bjorntorlarsson 5 місяців тому +1

      The one-man bunker and the Krummlaufgewehr (rifle with curved barrel and a little mirror, to shoot around corners) were other GREAT ideas in WW2.

    • @lordflufffluff
      @lordflufffluff 5 місяців тому +1

      You are the first comment.

  • @lb9355
    @lb9355 2 місяці тому +1

    10:41 is the truth. They meticulously documented everything because they truly believed they would win and they were preserving their legacy. Besides, look at it. It's clearly a Soviet design.

  • @joshuabessire9169
    @joshuabessire9169 5 місяців тому +4

    It's a kamikaze bouncing bomb. Japanese were gonna drop it on Hoover Dam with the Amerika bomber, but like most axis projects it was too complex and too stupid. I'm looking at you overlapping tank wheels.

  • @Visoko314
    @Visoko314 5 місяців тому

    Can you imagine how bloody uncomfortable , noisy, stinking of fuel and exhaust, boiling in summer, freezing in winter, and then the fact that you are an open target . My god. 😳

  • @umbrellacorpsecurity6511
    @umbrellacorpsecurity6511 2 місяці тому

    Hmm a "Rush Tank" Maybe? 1-2 people. Anti-Infantry guns at front. 1 flamethrower each side and the ability to spray/drop Anti-personnel mines behind it.
    Could be used to "Rush" down street city's, runways,trenches ect.
    Can be mounted on a bomber as a "turret" and say disconnect to parachute into the area seconds after aerial bombardment and start covering the area in AP mines

  • @jamesrose8048
    @jamesrose8048 5 місяців тому

    Try exploring the idea of a Kc390 converted to VIP seating for use by small governments for VIP TRANSPORT.

  • @anthonyiocca5683
    @anthonyiocca5683 5 місяців тому

    In battle, the situation dictates tactics. The advantage is the element of surprise…

  • @PulkaSkurken
    @PulkaSkurken 5 місяців тому

    if you dont find any documentation of the tank its either something old from WW1 or Russians being trolls again.

    • @avus-kw2f213
      @avus-kw2f213 5 місяців тому

      What if it’s Japanese ?

  • @daydaykilla
    @daydaykilla 3 місяці тому

    I was thinking of this kind of thing. I searched on google to see if it existed and someone already had the idea.

  • @GadreelAdvocat
    @GadreelAdvocat 5 місяців тому

    With some tweeks to the design in would make for an interesting amphibious vehicle
    .

  • @spookygulag9342
    @spookygulag9342 5 місяців тому +1

    When I was a kid I had an excursion to kubinka tank museum, and the guid told us about this ball. He describe it as a mobile recon / artillery corrector. In general museum is cool , after the smo I really suggests u to visit it. U will have awesome experience

  • @CaptainKrimson
    @CaptainKrimson 5 місяців тому +6

    The engine in the drawing at 5:45 looks very much like a VW Beetle engine. In that case it would have been a 4-cylinder 4-stroke.

  • @traumgeist
    @traumgeist 5 місяців тому

    That has to be a test vehicle sent to the Chinese by an American entrepreneur for evaluation, given the commonalities between it and the Modern Mechanix tanks. You can see why they didn’t order any.

  • @WetbackNoSetback
    @WetbackNoSetback 3 місяці тому

    I feel like it has the makings of power armor, like this would be mark 1 barely but thats basically what it is, a one man tank

  • @SleezyRider883
    @SleezyRider883 2 місяці тому

    fun fact this tank is the origin for the phrase "get on the ball"

  • @PennWolfsSailingAdventures
    @PennWolfsSailingAdventures 5 місяців тому

    "Ze furer vants to know vat your doing ozer zere". Tank driver: "NOZING, I'm playing vith mine ball".

  • @1SemperDad
    @1SemperDad 3 місяці тому

    The profile of the engine at time mark 5:43 looks specifically like a aircooled VW engine. Not sure whether this is based on documented fact or artist license. The engine at this point in time would have been 985 CCs or later around 1943 1121 CCs. They would have only produced 23-25 horsepower.

  • @Blechdackel
    @Blechdackel 5 місяців тому

    I've seen a lot about WW2 but never saw or heard about this weapon

  • @RicoBlueFR
    @RicoBlueFR 3 місяці тому

    The hopping tank is still my favourite, including this thing

  • @SuperYounice
    @SuperYounice 4 місяці тому

    They look like the Sovjet Lynx robots from the video game Generation Zero, now I know where the developers took their inspiration from 👏

  • @pietrosigismondodelvalentiiv
    @pietrosigismondodelvalentiiv 3 місяці тому

    Clearly an escape vehicle for a super villain.

  • @Emre_Kermen
    @Emre_Kermen 5 місяців тому

    Ball tanks make soo much sense and look really cool. Its a shame they are actually impossible.

  • @KlaxontheImpailr
    @KlaxontheImpailr 5 місяців тому +1

    Can't wait for Alan Aztec to sing about this.

    • @aleisterlavey9716
      @aleisterlavey9716 5 місяців тому +1

      Was rollt denn da durch Schlamm und Schnee?
      Kugelpanzer Extacy 😂😂😂

  • @RhettReimer
    @RhettReimer 2 місяці тому

    The Orb has decided to grant you mercy

  • @stillscion-bf7tg
    @stillscion-bf7tg 5 місяців тому

    Kugelpanzer is a recon, scouting vehicles to spy on Enemy position

    • @budgiefriend
      @budgiefriend 5 місяців тому

      Very non stealth for this purpose.

  • @ushumgal4828
    @ushumgal4828 5 місяців тому

    If they're so keen to prevent any examination and never show the interior...maybe it's just fake. A weird tank-shaped sculpture.

  • @jankarieben1071
    @jankarieben1071 3 місяці тому

    If it’s not a tank, I like the designation, “A.R.V.” or Armored Reconnaissance Vehicle.

  • @luftmoth
    @luftmoth 5 місяців тому +1

    Do a video on the dornier do 31

  • @samuelmelton8353
    @samuelmelton8353 4 місяці тому +1

    Warhammer 40k needs some new units

  • @yobadomayobaubabushki2912
    @yobadomayobaubabushki2912 5 місяців тому

    Я видел этот круглый танк. Он стоит в музее бронетехники военного парка Париот. Он очень маленький, размером с мотороллер.

  • @EcardEcardian
    @EcardEcardian 5 місяців тому

    I think there is no info on this thing because it was made under the Treaty of Versailes, I assume it was a armoured scout. Feels like ww1 thing.

  • @thomasmolloy5447
    @thomasmolloy5447 5 місяців тому

    The obvious counter to a tank built in the form of a ball would be a giant robot dog!

  • @Norsedragoon
    @Norsedragoon 2 місяці тому

    Would be crap on the western front, but imagine it operating on the Japanese held islands. Light, able to traverse terrain, and with a couple machine guns it becomes a mobile pill box.

  • @andrejmucic5003
    @andrejmucic5003 19 днів тому

    I saw it in Kubinka and that is not what it looks like, not even close.

  • @Stroopwaffe1
    @Stroopwaffe1 5 місяців тому

    20 minutes till the bus comes, think i can squeeze this in lol.

  • @vikingnusantara
    @vikingnusantara 2 місяці тому

    All these ww2 models that never got built look like a model we use to build when we are playing with autocad

  • @justinreedflynn
    @justinreedflynn 5 місяців тому

    I can tell that thing is totally incomplete. Probably used in one of the Nazi's "secret wars" we'll never hear about. Imagine it with wheel-covering rubber (with huge Swastika-like treads) and a tall skinny back wheel. That front porthole would have been for like a binocular or monocular attached to the weapon I'd think. It's something like a submarine being mistaken for a boat. The animation shows an old VW car engine, the narrator says a motorcycle engine, but then the narrator says "no engine". I'd believe a car engine. I think it's a sand dune/deep snow vehicle

  • @raijinmeister
    @raijinmeister 2 місяці тому

    When you take the expression "face roll" to another level.

  • @Andre_Kummel
    @Andre_Kummel 5 місяців тому +1

    They went balls up.

  • @Chef_Alpo
    @Chef_Alpo 3 місяці тому

    Back in I think '89 I had a GI Joe vehicle just like that except it has a chainsaw chain razor track instead of treads. I have to assume it was based off of this.

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 5 місяців тому

    7:00 Here I was just about to say that it's nothing an M2 machine gun can't fix.

  • @captainchimp
    @captainchimp 5 місяців тому

    hard breaking in a ball tank would probably end poorly