Does Glass Break Faster than a Bullet? - The Slow Mo Guys

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4 тис.

  • @willg9106
    @willg9106 2 роки тому +5987

    Dan is probably a candidate for the "most glass smashed by a single person" record at this point

    • @squatchjosh1131
      @squatchjosh1131 2 роки тому +167

      Well there is super humman, whose youtube channel is devoted to front flipping onto fluorescent light tubes and such for all the juggalos and juggalettes out there

    • @thereverbix9029
      @thereverbix9029 2 роки тому +91

      @@squatchjosh1131 most glass smashed by a single person (non-self destructive)

    • @S....
      @S.... 2 роки тому +99

      @@thereverbix9029 I don't think Dan counts as non-self destructive...

    • @squatchjosh1131
      @squatchjosh1131 2 роки тому +11

      @@S.... *Tony Hawk video intensifies*

    • @TheZohan907
      @TheZohan907 2 роки тому +4

      *Nick Lowe has entered the chat*

  • @sebastianhaas5863
    @sebastianhaas5863 2 роки тому +541

    One small thing I love about the slow mo guys is they always let things play out, like the bullet traveling all the way to the other side, without cutting or fast forwarding, just giving the aweseome footage the respect it deserves :D

    • @joshuasims5421
      @joshuasims5421 2 роки тому +5

      Absolutely!

    • @jacobkeyser8628
      @jacobkeyser8628 2 роки тому

      I think they have like a 4 hour video of a glass measuring cup shattering

    • @gokulnair
      @gokulnair 2 роки тому

      @@jacobkeyser8628 19 hours and 5 minutes more like 😂

  • @Daedivh
    @Daedivh 2 роки тому +675

    Slow-mo speed comparisons is a surprisingly interesting AND satisfying thing to watch. Think you guys stumbled onto a goldmine with this one.

    • @DragonOfTheMortalKombat
      @DragonOfTheMortalKombat 2 роки тому +6

      Yeah the glass cracking part was amazing, wished they had a faster rifle bullet instead.

    • @narref04
      @narref04 2 роки тому +1

      Next is a 223 cartridge.

  • @kuboskube
    @kuboskube 2 роки тому +841

    This was a fantastic video experience. No fluff, no faffin' about, straight to the point, amazing video editing, great explanations for how you chose to edit the clips.
    Very proud of you guys for this one. Good job!

    • @jonslg240
      @jonslg240 Рік тому +1

      Are they trying to tell us the speed of sound is faster in glass than air?
      I don't get it.. 😂

    • @kuboskube
      @kuboskube Рік тому +2

      @@jonslg240
      I don't remember why, but yes, the speed of sound is indeed faster through solid objects than through liquids or gases.

    • @skylarkesselring6075
      @skylarkesselring6075 Рік тому +3

      ​@@jonslg240 speed of sound changes depending on what the sound is traveling through.
      For example, speed of sound is quite fast in metals, partially responsible for why metal stuff is so loud when you hit it

    • @USGovsOwnersRtheRealEnemy
      @USGovsOwnersRtheRealEnemy Рік тому

      Well, not straight but they did get to it.

    • @kenziebalhatchet
      @kenziebalhatchet Рік тому

      @@jonslg240it is

  • @TimeBucks
    @TimeBucks 2 роки тому +651

    What a great combination

  • @joshuasims5421
    @joshuasims5421 2 роки тому +595

    I appreciate how they always leave in all of Dan’s firearm and pyrotechnics safety steps, calling out ‘safe’ etc. What a pro!

    • @hippokrampus2838
      @hippokrampus2838 2 роки тому +52

      I love it too, one because it shows that they care to do it right, and two because it shows how to do it right!

    • @inoob26
      @inoob26 2 роки тому +10

      Basically most people who uses firearms in a recording session does that...... I hope?

    • @nigelsmith7366
      @nigelsmith7366 2 роки тому +8

      He did not pull back the slide the check the breach after he dropped the mag out before putting it on safety.... Watch any professional or experienced firearms user he will pull the slid back once or twice to make sure that the breach is empty before he/she safes the gun... Yes I know he only put 1 bullet in the mag and put it on safe but for the sake of 1.5sec physical check of the breach is just good safe procedure

    • @isaacorwhatever4329
      @isaacorwhatever4329 2 роки тому +19

      @@nigelsmith7366 does it need to be slid back if its already slid back?

    • @PerpetualCamel
      @PerpetualCamel 2 роки тому +37

      @@nigelsmith7366 watch it again. He looks to see where the casing went, looks into the open slide, and then calls safe.

  • @coryman125
    @coryman125 2 роки тому +577

    I think the biggest thing we learned from this video is that even if what you're filming isn't anything new, it's still gonna be fun just watching your banter

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n 2 роки тому +5

      Bri'ish banta as weww. Although they are more RP than scouse

    • @f.cscootriders
      @f.cscootriders 2 роки тому +6

      I reckon these guys could film paint drying in slow motion and make it interesting.

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n 2 роки тому

      @@f.cscootriders It's more interesting if you speed it up and put it under a microscope. ua-cam.com/video/OW5wB8rJ8Zc/v-deo.html (60 Symbols)

  • @silverblast404
    @silverblast404 2 роки тому +364

    The bullet travels in a straight line, but the glass splinters out cracking every inch as it goes on. Its like racing someone who's running literal circles around you, after having lapped you.

    • @GeorgeDCowley
      @GeorgeDCowley Рік тому +27

      To be fair, it can go forwards and outwards at the same time, I think.

    • @sankang9425
      @sankang9425 Рік тому +38

      Nah, The cracks are not traveling. The shockwave is, and the cracks just follow.

    • @Dr.IanPlect
      @Dr.IanPlect Рік тому +3

      Silver Blast; tripe.

  • @guitarsimon1
    @guitarsimon1 2 роки тому +2452

    Dan’s firearm discipline is always a joy to see.

    • @pomx2900
      @pomx2900 2 роки тому +223

      British Army training.

    • @SnakeMan448
      @SnakeMan448 2 роки тому

      He's usually such a messy goofball, and then the guns or explosives come out and then he's absolute all business.

    • @CookingWithCows
      @CookingWithCows 2 роки тому +349

      It's almost like proper vetting and training for gun owners makes everyone safer

    • @himedo1512
      @himedo1512 2 роки тому

      @@CookingWithCows if you need training to not be a moron, wellllll

    • @matthewalvarojr.2634
      @matthewalvarojr.2634 2 роки тому +66

      @@CookingWithCows preposterous

  • @mudgernz1
    @mudgernz1 2 роки тому +385

    The stunt safety in me is so happy watching Dan fire a single readied round and still checking the chamber is clear before calling safe.

    • @the1anonymouse
      @the1anonymouse 2 роки тому +57

      Not just stunt safety but general firearms safety

    • @ruthlessluder
      @ruthlessluder 2 роки тому +4

      Common sense

    • @greatrj
      @greatrj 2 роки тому +6

      You would be surprised...

    • @Cptjonmiller
      @Cptjonmiller 2 роки тому +20

      Well he was in the military, and that habit stays. Much like the trigger finger habit with anything that has a trigger.

    • @distantignition
      @distantignition 2 роки тому +22

      I've noticed that some of the most dangerous stuff that happens isn't people new to handling something dangerous, but the people have handled it so much that they think that safety rules are for the new people.

  • @laserfloyd
    @laserfloyd 2 роки тому +226

    I always thought it'd be interesting to see slow-mo of metal being machined. There are some channels that run the 120 or 240fps but using one of those insane macro lenses to get right up to the cutter and see how the metal reacts seems like it'd be interesting.

  • @OfficialSamuelC
    @OfficialSamuelC 2 роки тому +102

    The gun safety etiquette Dan always has is great to see. Many could learn from that, as in learn to be doing the most basic thing you should do when handling firearms. So many shout safe before even checking the chamber is clear because it’s just an automatic thing they through out after each shot, with the assumption that it will always be safe no matter what.

    • @gilliganallmighty3
      @gilliganallmighty3 Рік тому +7

      A lot better then a certain actor/ producer and armorer.

    • @Dragongaga
      @Dragongaga Рік тому

      @@gilliganallmighty3 I can't remember if they said, but I hope that studio armorer got fired

  • @tyler1234321
    @tyler1234321 2 роки тому +276

    I will never get tires of seeing things in slow motion especially when it's shot this well. Your personalities are such an amazing addition to already great visuals.

    • @CaptainPanick
      @CaptainPanick 2 роки тому +11

      You may never get tires but I will never get tired of seeing things in slow motion. ;)

    • @tyler1234321
      @tyler1234321 2 роки тому +8

      @@CaptainPanick now I have to leave the typo lmao

    • @CaptainPanick
      @CaptainPanick 2 роки тому +8

      @@tyler1234321 Maybe one day our smartphone keyboards will predict correctly what we intend to say right? lol

    • @ddegn
      @ddegn 2 роки тому +2

      Some of these videos have a magical quality.
      Being able to see things we normally can't, can make the images look supernatural.

    • @NoNameAtAll2
      @NoNameAtAll2 2 роки тому +1

      tired*

  • @Ping_JJT7
    @Ping_JJT7 2 роки тому +166

    Been watching since 2012 and haven’t watched a single video of SlowMoGuys where I don’t enjoy it. Always awesome content. Thanks for all the videos and the efforts you put into it.

  • @ZoonCrypticon
    @ZoonCrypticon 2 роки тому +822

    For a next video, could you use a spring loaded glass crusher in the middle of a great sheet of glass, to see the circular propagation of the material-wave? And in a following experiment two or even three "epicenters" on the same sheet of glass which get triggered at the same time. Would be interesting to see 2 or 3 circular waves meeting each other, when the conducting medium already fails.

    • @souhung69
      @souhung69 2 роки тому +11

      That would indeed be quite amazing. I hope they see this comment

    • @d4rk0v3
      @d4rk0v3 2 роки тому +3

      I second. Like their comment.

    • @lavendec
      @lavendec 2 роки тому +21

      They would have to be extremely in sync to actually see multiple crushers

    • @MrBattlecharge
      @MrBattlecharge 2 роки тому +9

      Not sure how that would appear on playback, as their field of view gets thinner as the camera speed gets faster. So you might not be able to see everything at fast speeds or you see everything but it happens to quickly to see anything interesting at slower speeds.

    • @nikmrn
      @nikmrn 2 роки тому +1

      @@d4rk0v3 What?

  • @he-who
    @he-who 2 роки тому +569

    I looked it up and apparently the fastest cartridge is the .220 Swift, which has a published speed of about 3181mph. So it’d be really close to the glass breaking. I’d be curious to see it

    • @bok1080
      @bok1080 Рік тому +29

      About the closest factory ballistics would be the 22-250 rem with 35gn projectiles (factory ballistics of 4250fps) the glass is approximately 4600fps in this video, there are wildcat rounds that are faster, gs custom in south Africa had one to 5200fps

    • @TheLtVoss
      @TheLtVoss Рік тому +14

      Well if we'll go all out on guns I would think supcaliber rounds out of tank cannons cann be faster than the glass breaking
      Since I recall same numbers form the Leo2A5 and following models the muzzle velocity of the APFSD round out of the rh120 l55 is about 1750m/s so the 9mm on top of the glass breaking soo yeah ther is probably a gun and round at about 1436m/s so the exact same speed

    •  Рік тому +20

      @@TheLtVoss Not to mention how cool it would be to see Dan fire the Rh120 L/55 - I'm sure they can borrow one of those for a vid.

    • @MrChickensnatcher
      @MrChickensnatcher Рік тому +1

      That and shoot the glass.

    • @caedmonswanson2378
      @caedmonswanson2378 Рік тому +3

      Should shoot the glass with the bullet to get a real-time comparison

  • @Pat91670
    @Pat91670 2 роки тому +366

    I'd like to see a time lapse of Dan's lab coat over the years. It has been through alot 😆

  • @bluegizmo1983
    @bluegizmo1983 2 роки тому +167

    There are definitely some ammos that would come very close to keeping up with the glass breaking. For example, the 4,000 Feet per second (2,727 MPH) 35gr .223 ammo, or the 4,300 feet per second (2,931 MPH) .220 Swift ammo.

    • @michaelstancek8611
      @michaelstancek8611 2 роки тому +10

      I was going to comment, my dad used to hand load custom 220 swift rounds that were absolute heaters that would probably come close to the same speed as the glass

    • @camaro25
      @camaro25 2 роки тому +4

      I was also thinking they should use a rifle instead. That round would probably keep up with the breaking glass.

    • @CCW1911
      @CCW1911 2 роки тому +5

      The 223 WSM would be close in factory loadings, or if you went wildcat there is the 22 eargesplitten loudenboomer which is the 378 Weatherby Magnum necked to 22.

    • @Spillerrec
      @Spillerrec 2 роки тому +18

      Dan certainly gets confused, it is not an order of magnitude faster (at least with the most commonly used base of magnitude of 10) as it is around 4 times faster. Which is a lot, but still feels like in the realm of possibility. Him casually throwing that ball certainly is an order (or two) of magnitude slower than a bullet though. While numbers are hard to get a feel for, apparently the video comparison didn't do it for Dan either.

    • @Lexicon_
      @Lexicon_ 2 роки тому +13

      .220 Swift and .22-250 are both ludicrously fast with certain loads, .22-250 may even by slightly easier to find.

  • @KnightSlasher
    @KnightSlasher 2 роки тому +380

    Seeing the glass and the bullet moving at the same time is really interesting and nice to see, combined that with the speed the Flash has some competition

    • @NarturArkano
      @NarturArkano 2 роки тому +1

      But the Flash runs faster than time!

    • @UnlovedD2
      @UnlovedD2 2 роки тому +2

      220 Swift should have exactly the same speed as glass

    • @i-_-am-_-g1467
      @i-_-am-_-g1467 2 роки тому

      Now do the same thing with a .408 Cheytac (3500 ft/s), .50bmg (4000ft/s) or the big daddy .220 swift (4665 ft/s)

    • @i-_-am-_-g1467
      @i-_-am-_-g1467 2 роки тому +1

      @@UnlovedD2 this

    • @queueeeee9000
      @queueeeee9000 2 роки тому

      Not even close

  • @LeonardMeltsner
    @LeonardMeltsner 2 роки тому +22

    The discussion about the speed of sound in a solid (like glass) wraps back around to Gav's old question about the speed of push in a lovely way.

  • @Frost-jz6ee
    @Frost-jz6ee 2 роки тому +97

    I love that these guys have never lost their consistency. Never changed and never needed to. Just a perfect channel imo

    • @hopegold883
      @hopegold883 2 роки тому +1

      I like the new logo though

    • @puppergump4117
      @puppergump4117 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah the super slow show was painful to watch

  • @Seraph.G
    @Seraph.G 2 роки тому +121

    I love how the glass stays in place for about as long as it takes the bullet to travel the full distance

    • @supermaximglitchy1
      @supermaximglitchy1 2 роки тому +8

      gravity has his own speed wich is way slower than a bullet

    • @morimetz
      @morimetz 2 роки тому

      That's clearly a fast forward at the end 😄

  • @Bernwon
    @Bernwon 2 роки тому +29

    That comparison side by side really quantifies the speed of the glass breaking. You could have said the speed and it wouldn’t mean nearly as much as something like this! Love it.

  • @rickintexas1584
    @rickintexas1584 2 роки тому +28

    I was definitely surprised by how much faster the glass was. That was cool.

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway Рік тому

      3:30 Different speeds of sound. Mind blown

  • @DerpyGrump
    @DerpyGrump 2 роки тому +28

    “I do have some bushy wings on me.”
    What an amazing Dan quote.

    • @codybarnes3548
      @codybarnes3548 2 роки тому +3

      The way Gav completely lost his train of thought looking at him had me rolling 😂

  • @xKold
    @xKold 2 роки тому +599

    The .220 swift can reach speeds of upwards of 4000 ft/s. Or Mach 4. That's the closest you might find. I happen to own a 6.5 creedmoor rifle, it pushes 3020 ft/s. I think there are some rifle cartridges that will give glass a run for its money!
    Love the videos guys! Would love to see this revisited!

    • @BeetleBuns
      @BeetleBuns 2 роки тому +25

      it would have to be a pretty hot .220 swift load, the glass is shattering at 4714 fps. I think the fastest factory load I've seen for .220 was 4600 or something

    • @Mrx1080
      @Mrx1080 2 роки тому +9

      There would be wildcat calibers that would be faster I'd imagine, but yeah I suspect the glass would beat everything commercially available.

    • @jakeryan6638
      @jakeryan6638 2 роки тому +6

      @@Mrx1080 Put the ol .17/50 incinerator in the lineup

    • @sbreheny
      @sbreheny 2 роки тому +22

      From what I've read, there seems to be a practical "wall" at around 4600 feet/second. You can push it faster but accuracy is very poor, the bullets often break up, and barrels only last a few shots. .220 Swift is the fastest round in large-scale production as far as I know, and it is only about 300 fps slower than this "wall" which was achieved with the stupidly silly ".22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer "

    • @DudeOfCoolness45
      @DudeOfCoolness45 2 роки тому +1

      Is that muzzle velocity or downrange?

  • @austinclark2541
    @austinclark2541 2 роки тому +65

    A .220 Swift is the closest bullet with a speed comparable to the speed of sound in glass. Would be very interesting to see how close they are!

    • @Vinyl389
      @Vinyl389 2 роки тому +11

      The fastest published .220 swift was 4,665 FPS through a hand load (from p.o. Ackleys reloading handbook) The glass breaking in this video is moving at 4713 FPS. So pretty close but the glass is still slightly faster

    • @21babydew
      @21babydew 2 роки тому

      The only rounds I can think of are modern smooth bore cannons shooting apfsds at speeds of over 1500m/s some over 1700m/s beyond that you would need a rail gun to go faster

    • @oskar8413
      @oskar8413 2 роки тому +6

      The only rifle round that could beat the glass I think would be something ludicrous like the .22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer. Yes it's a real wildcat cartridge lmao

    • @driftertank
      @driftertank 2 роки тому

      @@oskar8413
      P.O. Ackley was a mad genius...

  • @napolitano7150
    @napolitano7150 2 роки тому +1

    The quality of this video is incredible. Thanks

  • @awdies
    @awdies 2 роки тому +7

    Garand Thumb, Kentucky Ballistics, Demolition Ranch would all be great collabs.
    Great stuff as always!
    Cheers,
    T

    • @unfitcheetah
      @unfitcheetah 2 роки тому +1

      I was just going to say with the full range of guns and ammo available to Demo ranch this would be an incredible collab. But you are correct Granad, Kentucky or even the AK guy would make amazing videos.

    • @tychothefriendlymonolith
      @tychothefriendlymonolith 2 роки тому +1

      You forgot Gun Jesus.

    • @awdies
      @awdies 2 роки тому +1

      @@unfitcheetah I would lean toward Garand as he's really informative with his overviews. And he's kind of in the same realm as slo mo being teaching/learning.
      But I'd take anyone tbh.

  • @somecunninglinguist
    @somecunninglinguist 2 роки тому +20

    I can't believe that when I started watching this channel the technology didn't really exist to watch glass break like this and now we're here

  • @GenericaQwerty
    @GenericaQwerty 2 роки тому +56

    3:28 Dan's explanation here of the speed of sound comparison was so simple and interesting!!
    Bullet: faster than sound in air, but slower than sound in glass. I never knew how that worked until now and Dan summed it up so nicely.
    That's my one thing learnt for today! I can turn my brain off now (and it's not even 8am hahaha)

    • @Lucas-dy4or
      @Lucas-dy4or 2 роки тому +7

      Yep that’s how it works. As sound is longitudinal it relies on particles vibrating each other to produce a wave. Seeing as air particles are ‘free’ and there’s lots of space between them, the speed of sound in air is much slower than a liquid or solid, where the particles are always touching. Seeing as they’re always touching it allows for much faster ‘transfer of vibration’. Something that makes a lot of sense but you’d never think of it had someone not told you :D Hope the crude explanation was helpful

    • @GenericaQwerty
      @GenericaQwerty 2 роки тому +2

      @@Lucas-dy4or fantastic explanation, that makes perfect sense! Thank you! 😊

    • @InsanePigeon
      @InsanePigeon 2 роки тому +2

      It's interesting that he mentioned the speed of sound because the bullet in the first slow motion was going nearly exactly the speed of sound in air.

    • @racer927
      @racer927 Рік тому

      ​​@@Lucas-dy4orSound being faster in solid ground can be heard in one video where they were disposing 100 tons of old explosives and when they went off, the camera picked up the rumbling of the exposions through the ground before the shockwave in the air reached it.

  • @ShortMan_123
    @ShortMan_123 2 місяці тому +1

    The attention to detail of making the arrow purple when the red and blue meet... so good

  • @applianceman6194
    @applianceman6194 2 роки тому +167

    What is amazing is the bullet left the screen just as the kick back of the gun Dan was holding was just starting. Makes one curious how far the bullet travels for Dan to recover from the kick back and has the weapon level again. That would be amazing to see.

    • @taliakuznetsova7092
      @taliakuznetsova7092 2 роки тому +11

      It reminds me how the an-94 fires bullets so fast (with it's special semi auto mode) as to land more shots before recoil hits the user. This video really puts into perspective how viable a concept that was (although it didn't hit mass use for many reasons)

    • @bvoyelr
      @bvoyelr 2 роки тому +6

      Unless he's an AMAZING speed shooter, the bullet would travel about 100 meters before Dan would be ready to fire again -- that'd be a quarter second split, which I think is pretty close to as good as you can get before you get into competition speeds.
      The current world record is .10 second splits (give or take -- it was 5 shots over .57 seconds). In that case, each bullet would travel 40 meters before the next shot went off. (This is ignoring the fact that the shooter wasn't using 9mm, and I'm actually unsure of what caliber he was using, but presumably it was a slower load, so it'll be in the same ballpark as 9mm)

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому +1

      @@taliakuznetsova7092 it fires them before the rifle starts recoil in a 2 round burst*

  • @Xanderviceory
    @Xanderviceory 2 роки тому +123

    I'm a glass blower and glass cracking is the worst part of my day, but I've always been obsessed with how fast it cracks, I absolutely love your videos on it. I was told by an old timer in the industry that the uniqueness of the sound is that it causes a micro sonic boom, thats why when in our noisy shop and a tiny piece of glass cracks you can "feel" the tink sound from across the studio. I dont know if its true but it sounds quite compelling. I dont know if your resolution at max speed would be able to pick up on that

    • @Xanderviceory
      @Xanderviceory 2 роки тому +18

      Since glass cracks at Mach 4.1 It seems reasonable that theres some form of "sonic boom" involved unless I'm way off on my maths

    • @jesper164a
      @jesper164a 2 роки тому +1

      @@Xanderviceory They have made videos of glass cracking in even more slow motion than this.

    • @Skinflaps_Meatslapper
      @Skinflaps_Meatslapper 2 роки тому +16

      The initial movement of the glass when cracking far exceeds the speed of sound in air, so it would create a sonic boom. However, the amount of movement is so slight that it probably wouldn't create a pressure wave big enough to see on film. Any sort of sonic boom is a compression event, meaning the sound it makes is not the same as a sound wave...you're hearing and feeling a shockwave rather than sound propagation. That's likely why you're able to feel it from a distance, because shockwaves act differently than sound waves.

    • @musiciseverything120
      @musiciseverything120 2 роки тому +2

      @@Skinflaps_Meatslapper woah I've never thought about that. In what way are they different?

    • @Skinflaps_Meatslapper
      @Skinflaps_Meatslapper 2 роки тому +9

      @@musiciseverything120 In a visual representation, a soundwave is generally a nice curvy sinusoidal shape, whereas a shockwave is a square or sawtooth shape. Soundwaves are a gradual increase and reduction in pressure whereas a shockwave is a violent and abrupt overpressure event all compressed into a very short burst. The sonic boom of aircraft is basically all the sound that the aircraft makes in flight concentrated into a single pressure wave, so rather than it being spread out over a period of time, it happens all at once. That's why a near supersonic jet won't blow windows out but the same jet flying just a little over the speed of sound will.

  • @djafk
    @djafk 2 роки тому +23

    It's always super cool that glass breaks internally completely before collapsing.

  • @paulcousins6535
    @paulcousins6535 2 роки тому +17

    The production quality in your videos is top shelf. Highly informative, and highly entertaining!

  • @puzzzl
    @puzzzl 2 роки тому +16

    For those interested, the timing of the glass breaking starts when the bullet is 77% of the way across the span.

  • @colinmacvicar2507
    @colinmacvicar2507 2 роки тому +399

    I’d like to see the comparison of different types of glass breaking. Like regular, tempered, laminated and even rupert drops.

    • @TheWebster109
      @TheWebster109 2 роки тому +16

      Regular glass and laminate glass would be pretty boring as they would just crack or fall apart and not explode like tempered glass

    • @tarantulamadness6191
      @tarantulamadness6191 2 роки тому +3

      @@TheWebster109 and rupert drops are tiny, they would instantly break from one side to the other lol.

    • @inflatablewolfie
      @inflatablewolfie 2 роки тому +43

      @@tarantulamadness6191 Nothing is instant if you have a fast enough camera.

    • @khuedinhvan1986
      @khuedinhvan1986 2 роки тому +1

      ok

    • @grahamstretch6863
      @grahamstretch6863 2 роки тому +2

      @@tarantulamadness6191They have done the Rupert drops, or at least someone has, I’ve seen them.
      Found the video for you, not slo mo guys sadly. ua-cam.com/video/X3o71W4uNHc/v-deo.html

  •  8 місяців тому +1

    Glass breaking often look instantaneous. But getting a measurablecrepresentation of the speed glass breaks is one a whole other level.

  • @vichetkim4487
    @vichetkim4487 2 роки тому +19

    It's crazy to think spacecrafts go even faster than the speed of the glass shattering

    • @penguinpower314
      @penguinpower314 2 роки тому +6

      Top speed of the Parker Solar Probe is about 133 times faster than the glass break. Unbelievable

  • @aaronhume
    @aaronhume 2 роки тому +81

    I think the closest rounds you will come close to the speed of the glass shattering are: .17 Remington (or possibly .17 Remington Fireball), .223 Winchester Super Short Magnum aka WSSM, .220 Swift, .224 Weatherby Magnum, .22-250 Remington, and .204 Ruger... most of which are very uncommon rifle rounds. I think the .204 Ruger may have the best chance here based on reloading data in my book.

    • @mk5edc-477
      @mk5edc-477 2 роки тому

      Yeah. Just read the same article.

    • @skullandcrossbones65
      @skullandcrossbones65 2 роки тому +13

      G'day, Found this on a quick search from Wikipedia, " The .220 Swift remains the fastest commercial cartridge in the world, with a published velocity of 1,422 m/s (4,665 ft/s) using a 1.9 grams (29 gr) bullet and 2.7 grams (42 gr) of 3031 powder"
      That is 46FPS slower than the glass and would vary betweel loads, Atmospheric conditions and firearms used.

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому +1

      204 ruger with 32 grains at 4400fps

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому

      @@skullandcrossbones65 get a 26-30 inch 220 swift and it should be faster than the glass

    • @skullandcrossbones65
      @skullandcrossbones65 2 роки тому

      @@WayStedYou G'day, I am satisfied running a .223 Rem, If I think that won't do the job I have a .270 Win that will take care if anything "Down Under".

  • @LowkeyAirgunner
    @LowkeyAirgunner 2 роки тому +17

    Impressive footage as always!
    _Our eyes can't see half of the things that are happening arround us...even a bee can fly fast enough to make us wonder what it really was._

  • @MilkGlue-xg5vj
    @MilkGlue-xg5vj 7 місяців тому +1

    Remember switching to your glass is faster than reloading your bullet

  • @Dr.Nikolai27
    @Dr.Nikolai27 2 роки тому +143

    Just wanted to include the mind-blowing fact that in the first shot, the bullet is going at 343 m/s or 768mph, which is the EXACT speed of sound at 20°C! What a phenomenal coincidence and representation of the speed of sound!

    • @duncanjsparks
      @duncanjsparks 2 роки тому +2

      I wondered this and googled the speed of sound and then checked back at the bullet speed 😮

    • @TesserId
      @TesserId 2 роки тому +6

      Google says to expect "between 990 and 1350 feet per second." With the speed of sound being 1125 fps (343 m/s). That makes it reasonable median. So, I'm not shocked, except that it came out pretty close to _exact._

    • @doomsdayrabbit4398
      @doomsdayrabbit4398 2 роки тому +2

      Given the time this was shot, it's probably exactly that temperature outside.

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому

      it would've slowed down a bit by the end of the 6ft

    • @TaxingIsThieving
      @TaxingIsThieving 2 роки тому

      What does that mean? No sound?

  • @assistantmagus5213
    @assistantmagus5213 2 роки тому +8

    The best thing about this channel is always the shift in reference point you get to actually comprehend how fast certain things are, like bullets and glass cracking to our eyes both just seem instant since they're too fast for us to process, I thought they'd be comparable and would've had no idea otherwise that glass cracking is more than 4x faster, it's fascinating.
    Well - that's actually really the second best thing about this channel, the first would be Dan's lab coat.

  • @ricmanchas5799
    @ricmanchas5799 2 роки тому +26

    The .220 Swift is a semi-rimmed rifle cartridge developed by Winchester and introduced in 1935 for small game and varmint hunting. It was the first factory-loaded rifle cartridge with a muzzle velocity of over 1,200 m/s, just under Mach 4.

    • @potatojake197
      @potatojake197 2 роки тому

      I was just about to suggest this, hopefully they can get their hands on some

    • @r2-d2-e2
      @r2-d2-e2 2 роки тому +2

      Checkout the .22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer

    • @raygumm
      @raygumm 2 роки тому +6

      Doing the math of that cartridge in ft/s (4000 ish) vs the glass (4700ish) the 220 swift wouldn't be quite fast enough unless it was loaded pretty spicy which i reckon could be a tad dangerous. I recommend a Kentucky Ballistics collab.

    • @SoftwareSimian_
      @SoftwareSimian_ 2 роки тому +2

      Its watermelon slowmo time!

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому

      @@raygumm its much faster with modern powders the 4000fps load is from the 1930s,, you can reach 4400 with factory ammo now

  • @Carlosramirez-he4zi
    @Carlosramirez-he4zi 2 роки тому +4

    You guys are the real gem of youtube, the real gem of youtube.

  • @Skinflaps_Meatslapper
    @Skinflaps_Meatslapper 2 роки тому +14

    The cartridge you'd want to use to compare speed is a .22-284, it's a way overbored cartridge, and loaded with a 60gr bullet they'll hit 4400fps (3,000mph). Lighter bullets will approach and sometimes exceed 5,000fps (3,400mph), so you'd be able to beat the glass in a race with the right load. Also, the lightweight bullets (40gr or so) have a tendency to rip themselves apart soon after departing the barrel, which is why heavier match bullets are the usual load for this cartridge...only a handful of heavily jacketed bullets will handle the speed and centrifugal forces coming out of a 1:7 twist barrel. Having a bullet disintegrate midair would be an awesome thing to capture on camera, but it's an unpredictable event that might happen right out of the barrel, 50 yards out, on impact with a gnat, or not at all. I guess you could score the bullet before loading to make it a little more predictable.

    • @russelltalbot9439
      @russelltalbot9439 2 роки тому +2

      Dear slow mo guys: please listen to this guy! It would be so cool to see a bullet rip itself apart! However: a few tweaks to his request. 1: it might be hard for you to get a 22-284. So get a 22-250 as they are everywhere. Hornady makes a 35 grain ntx bullet in the “superformance” line that will achieve 4450 fps. It still won’t be as fast as glass, but much closer.
      Second: if you CAN use custom bullet loads, then please do what he is suggesting as either of these calibers (with custom loads) can achieve speeds high enough to catch this glass, AND have the potential to rip itself apart! That would be so cool to see in slow motion!!
      Also: food for thought there are ample rumors that a .17 Fireball in R&D had several test rounds that were vaporizing as soon as it left the muzzle. (Or at least tearing itself apart.)
      Please, please try this! Listen to this guy, he knows what he’s talking about, I just added to it. Thanks for the fun content!

    • @ke5clr
      @ke5clr 2 роки тому

      Agreed. Seeing a bullet over rev and tear itself apart in slow motion would be really cool. I can easily accomplish this with my 22 creedmoor and light weight bullets. The problem of course would be figuring out when the catastrophic failure will happen.

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому

      That would be much harder to find than a 22-250 at 4400fps factory loading

    • @Skinflaps_Meatslapper
      @Skinflaps_Meatslapper 2 роки тому

      I'm from Texas, only a few hours away from these guys, and I happen to have two guns available in .22-284. I don't mind bringing them out and loading up some real barrel burners if they're interested.
      The .17 Rem, .204 Ruger, .220 Swift, and .22-250 can all be loaded to ridiculous velocities, but the .22-284 has them all beat by a good margin. In its introduction, Bob Hutton was getting 6,585fps from a 15gr iron projo and 50 grains of 4227, the iron was necessary to keep the projo intact at those speeds and with the lower density of iron they could keep the weight down while maintaining a reasonable aerodynamic shape. Titanium might be a good replacement candidate for iron if one wanted to recreate those velocities today. It's by no means a practical cartridge, but if you're wanting to launch extremely low BC bullets that look like miniaturized ICBM's at mach 5, or take a small bullet and send it to legitimately hypersonic speeds, it's probably the most practical cartridge you can find.

  • @ClanImprobable
    @ClanImprobable 2 роки тому +115

    I endlessly love how endlessly amazed you two remain after all these slow mo years.

  • @derrickbennett935
    @derrickbennett935 2 роки тому +9

    I always get so excited when I see a notification for a new slow mo guys video. One of my favorite channels on UA-cam.

  • @sneakyreviewswithjosh
    @sneakyreviewswithjosh Рік тому +27

    When you eventually get the chance (hopefully not in Texas) you guys should film snowballs hitting glass and exploding in slow motion. I bet that would look amazing!

    • @agilemind6241
      @agilemind6241 8 місяців тому

      Or the shattering of icicles.

  • @Vickie-Bligh
    @Vickie-Bligh 2 роки тому +5

    What a great combination. 2 of my favorite episodes combined into one. Well done, lads.

  • @Slarty_42
    @Slarty_42 2 роки тому +6

    Who cares if we learnt nothing new, the footage is always mind blowing. Keep it up guys!

  • @th3ycallmearr0w8
    @th3ycallmearr0w8 2 роки тому +22

    I think it would be cool to revisit this with maybe 5.56 and 7.62x51. Also if you can, the 220 swift is one of the fastest bullets and thus has the best chance to keep up to the glass.

    • @hypervanguy
      @hypervanguy 2 роки тому +3

      Yup 220 swift will beat it

    • @doshjavis6194
      @doshjavis6194 2 роки тому +6

      Published velocity for the 220 Swift is 1422m/s. And the glass was shown at 1436m/s. So maybe on a good shot and a slow break, it might have a chance, but not likely.

    • @Shezestriakis
      @Shezestriakis 2 роки тому +3

      Is there a bullet with a velocity of ~4,700 ft/s? About 66.5% faster than the Barret they showed in the short clip at the start. That's what you need according to my terrible math.

    • @hypervanguy
      @hypervanguy 2 роки тому +2

      @@doshjavis6194 ya . Sorry it would be close . Nothing exact . Depending on the set up barrel , barrel length and other factors it could be faster or slower then the published speed

    • @lunam7249
      @lunam7249 2 роки тому +1

      @@Shezestriakis 22-250.... 1 mile per second....still to slow to keep up with broken glass

  • @ysquaredyobozo
    @ysquaredyobozo 2 роки тому +1

    atleast from a quick google search, the fastest commercially available bullet is still about 16% slower than the glass you broke

  • @SolidGamer92
    @SolidGamer92 2 роки тому +9

    I just love the atmosphere in your videos, guys. You make things that are slow so much fun. :D

  • @cottsak
    @cottsak 2 роки тому +3

    There is so much under appreciated talent in these videos that has absolutely nothing to do with filming things at high frame rates 🤣🤣🤣

  • @leifwulffstephan3725
    @leifwulffstephan3725 2 роки тому +9

    This is one the best channels ever made, it is just SO damn interesting and original, no?

  • @juanmiguelsebastian1477
    @juanmiguelsebastian1477 2 роки тому +2

    This experiment is now my new found knowledge. I never thought that a shattering glass would actually be able to beat a bullet. After your explanation on the speed of sound in different mediums, I recalled my lessons in science class. The speed of sound changes depending on the mediums state of matter. The more compact atoms are the easier sound and vibration travels

  • @zsavage1820
    @zsavage1820 2 роки тому +11

    WOW you guys never seem to disappoint.. you 2 are just getting better and better... love the content and been a fan for a few years, Merry Xmas to you and yours from me and mine.. SLOW MO GUYS fan for life... :)

  • @waelsenani8180
    @waelsenani8180 2 роки тому +13

    6:24 Dan got that light skin stare

  • @pyglik2296
    @pyglik2296 2 роки тому +215

    It's amazing that the glass breaking is so much faster than the bullet, but the bullet still has a plenty of time to leave the frame before the glass starts falling down.

    • @tritamtran7264
      @tritamtran7264 2 роки тому +1

      ok

    • @jjones2582
      @jjones2582 2 роки тому +7

      Yep that was particularly interesting too. The glass falling seemed a lot slower than the bullet, even though in real time it seemed to fall almost instantly.

    • @danhtranquoc3745
      @danhtranquoc3745 2 роки тому

      ok

    • @coolbluereview
      @coolbluereview 2 роки тому

      Atleast the bullet is faster than gravity.

    • @jjones2582
      @jjones2582 2 роки тому

      @@coolbluereview - That's probably not the right way to say that since the speed of gravity is considered to be the same as the speed of light.

  • @TrackerSully
    @TrackerSully 7 місяців тому +1

    The international space station travels 5½ times faster than glass shatters. Interesting!

  • @MatthewLickers
    @MatthewLickers 2 роки тому +4

    I love any of the episodes with the speed of glass breaking, it’s so interesting to me that it shatters so quickly

  • @DragonHide94
    @DragonHide94 2 роки тому +54

    Well, after converting for fps, your glass is breaking at about 4700 ft/s. There are actually a few sub .22 cal cartridges with factory loads which exceed 4000ft/s, and a couple that are pushing 4500ft/s... I think it would be interesting to see roughly equivalent bullet to glass velocities.

    • @glock17games
      @glock17games 2 роки тому +7

      .220 swift is probably the closest you can find with out beeing too niche / boutique altought its been fading ever since the 223s came around

    • @DragonHide94
      @DragonHide94 2 роки тому +7

      @@glock17games supposedly Hornady's Superformance line have .22-250 and .204 Ruger loads that run 4400 ft/s, and I feel like that's about as fast as you'll get from factory loads.
      I also just remembered seeing someone on UA-cam loading .300 Win Mag with saboted .223s and pushing over 5000ft/s, so that's another option. (Punched holes clean through 1/2 inch ar500 plate at 200 yards...)

    • @TonyHilliardSedona
      @TonyHilliardSedona 2 роки тому +2

      .17 Flintstone Super Eyebunger 4,798 ft/s (1,462 m/s)

    • @ericspooner
      @ericspooner 2 роки тому +1

      22-243 middlestead it is possible to go faster with a 30 gr bullet, but this takes hand loading, and also runny pretty toasty.

    • @__photi__
      @__photi__ 2 роки тому +1

      Was just about to comment about wanting to see it done with a .220 swift load

  • @gusterblack6946
    @gusterblack6946 2 роки тому +4

    We love seeing you guys, thanks for the amazing slow mo shots!!!

  • @polinanikulina
    @polinanikulina Рік тому +1

    The arrow turning purple is so satisfying! I also love the music of the glass after it's cracked.

  • @justinlong5892
    @justinlong5892 2 роки тому +18

    I love Dan's firearm knowledge and discipline.

  • @abarratt8869
    @abarratt8869 2 роки тому +4

    Another epic vid!
    We know where this is going to go, eventually. It'll be a massive slab of borosilicate glass, and rounds from some uber-sniping rifle.
    Or, as they have already explored filming the speed of light, they'll return to compare the speed of light in air vs the speed of light in glass or water. Now, that would be a sight to behold!

  • @Frank_UK_was_taken
    @Frank_UK_was_taken 2 роки тому +9

    Amazing video as always :)
    I'd love to see you guys look at certain workshop tools.
    I can imagine it would be rather mystifying looking at how a tool might cut through wood/ metal as if they were butter in slowmotion :)

  • @DistiIIer
    @DistiIIer 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome video. I'm hammered right now, and I was amazed 👏

  • @jessicasass9460
    @jessicasass9460 2 роки тому +25

    It's interesting that the glass holdS together until the entire pane has cracked and THEN it falls apart.

    • @MushookieMan
      @MushookieMan 2 роки тому +15

      It was falling apart the whole time, but the acceleration due to gravity is quite a small effect on those short timescales.

    • @Noble4Truths
      @Noble4Truths 2 роки тому

      Exactly my thoughts

    • @teatimeboy3240
      @teatimeboy3240 2 роки тому +2

      It didn’t held together hahahaha it was just cracking extremely fast. It was falling right away, just slow. 9,81 meters per second to be exact. That’s very slow in comparison to the speed of the cracking as you saw

    • @haveaday1812
      @haveaday1812 2 роки тому

      It has to do with energy transfer and tensile strength. For one, it’s clearly tempered glass, as it breaks into much smaller, more uniform pieces. Tempered glass is treated with certain chemicals in the manufacturing process that increases its stress resistance to outside forces. When the glass is broken at a specific point by the pliers, it sends a tiny amount of thermal stress into the glass. That wave of breaking is literally an energy transfer. As it reaches the end, the energy has no where to go, so it most likely dissipates back into the glass in the opposite direction. The same energy that caused it to shatter, now causes it to collapse. Like a rebound effect. If the pane of glass was contained or lined with another material to keep its shape and tensile strength after breaking, the energy would have somewhere else to travel, thereby keeping the glass shattered, but in place, negating the rebound of the energy transfer. There are videos of people doing this for aesthetic purposes.

    • @EverDee
      @EverDee 2 роки тому +1

      @@teatimeboy3240 It was not falling at 9.81 m/sec it was accelerating at 9.81 m/sec^2.

  • @Agent-ur9tp
    @Agent-ur9tp 2 роки тому +9

    Absolutely here for this lads! LETS GOOO

  • @jeffreymericle7984
    @jeffreymericle7984 2 роки тому +4

    The bullet with the highest muzzle velocity is the .220 Swift, with a velocity of 1,422 meters per second. Only slightly less than the speed that the glass broke in this video. It would pretty cool to see the side-by-side on that!

  • @wirelesmike73
    @wirelesmike73 2 роки тому +4

    I knew that the glass would be faster than the bullet, but I'm shocked by just how much faster it is. That's crazy. Well done, fellas. You guys are the best.👍👍

  • @joshuabarbre3245
    @joshuabarbre3245 3 місяці тому +1

    Yup we knew the outcome but it was cool to see them side by side.

  • @Raz.C
    @Raz.C 2 роки тому +5

    Dear SloMo Guys
    I'd really like to see more about shockwaves. I've seen the copious amount of explosives vids you've already done, but what I'd like to see now is whether shockwaves can have cumulative effects on each other, or whether they can cancel each other out, depending, of course, on the properties of each individual shockwave. Anyway, if this sounds like it would be fun to film, then I'd love to watch it!!

  • @MrTheBigNoze
    @MrTheBigNoze 2 роки тому +34

    I love how Dan is still rocking his tattered and destroyed lab coat after all these years 😂

    • @workingguy-OU812
      @workingguy-OU812 2 роки тому +1

      He has replaced it numerous times.

    • @GenericaQwerty
      @GenericaQwerty 2 роки тому

      @@workingguy-OU812 he hasn't replaced it. He uses a different one for their UA-cam originals and TV show, but this one is the original. :)

    • @stephanieparker1250
      @stephanieparker1250 2 роки тому

      I think he keeps it hermetically sealed between videos.

  • @heldthelever
    @heldthelever 2 роки тому +3

    One of the few remaining consistent creators from the golden age

  • @reissmain6573
    @reissmain6573 Рік тому +1

    Been watching you guys since I was a kid, makes me so happy watching this

  • @widgget
    @widgget 2 роки тому +8

    would be cool to see a bunch of different bullets all edited together like this to see the differences directly against the others.

    • @capt_iron2797
      @capt_iron2797 2 роки тому +1

      They have that on one of there slow mo show videos it's a great watch and the both flex there camera and firearm prowess in it.

  • @alanmihalko502
    @alanmihalko502 2 роки тому +4

    There are a few rifle cartridges that would come close to keeping up with the glass. A .17 Remington can hit about 4200 fps. Not as fast but getting in that range. Great video.

    • @zoixdark
      @zoixdark 2 роки тому +2

      Ruger .204 can do 4400. Might be able to get a custom load to do 4,600.

  • @Lord_Baphomet_
    @Lord_Baphomet_ 2 роки тому +86

    I honestly thought there would be more collabs with Mehdi… like there are sooooo many things he does on his channel that would look AMAZING in slo-mo.

    • @theslowmoguys
      @theslowmoguys  2 роки тому +65

      Would definitely do more

    • @toasterhavingabath6980
      @toasterhavingabath6980 2 роки тому +22

      is that the one guy who almost kills himself with electricity every time he makes a video

    • @itol2398
      @itol2398 2 роки тому +9

      Says "Toaster in a Bath".
      Lol

    • @baconvonmeatwich
      @baconvonmeatwich 2 роки тому +12

      I think a collaboration with Kentucky Ballistics would be fun, especially when he blows up guns. It would be interesting to see where the actual point of failure is.

    • @thinfourth
      @thinfourth 2 роки тому +5

      @@theslowmoguys PHOTONICINDUCTION!!!!!
      You know who he is
      You know what he can do
      Bring a hammer

  • @rianmacdonald9454
    @rianmacdonald9454 Рік тому +1

    I don't know why, but I loved watching the slow motion of that glass. It clicked something in my mind watching it spread like that.

  • @clintlewry9806
    @clintlewry9806 2 роки тому +3

    As usual, that’s some seriously quality slow-mo, keep it up gents!

  • @Sgt_SealCluber
    @Sgt_SealCluber 2 роки тому +5

    The glass brakes at roughly 4700 ft/s and the fastest round I could find is the .22-250 Remington. Specifically the Hornady 35gr NTX bullet at 4,450 fps. You might be able to get a hand load up to 4700, maybe.

    • @feedbackzaloop
      @feedbackzaloop 2 роки тому +1

      Imagine Hornady making custom loads to exactly match the speed? That would be a collab!

  • @Strataklas.
    @Strataklas. 2 роки тому +9

    Ι am so happy to see you continuing the channel and uploading amzing content!

  • @DissarayJay
    @DissarayJay 4 місяці тому +1

    These videos always make me question reality, since we all saw a glass break and a gun shoot, and without even knowing it... we would say the glass is faster.

  • @hyperthreaded
    @hyperthreaded 2 роки тому +44

    Interesting how shape of the wavefront in the glass goes from round to almost straight because it forms a circle around the initial cracking point at all times

    • @thoatran2718
      @thoatran2718 2 роки тому

      ok

    • @Beschaulichkeit
      @Beschaulichkeit 2 роки тому +1

      I wish I had the words to describe this from a mathematical perspective. Something about the angle that defines a given section length at a given radius?

    • @alexabc220
      @alexabc220 Рік тому +5

      @@Beschaulichkeit I think because the glass cracks in a circle from the point of damage. Imagine the initial break being the centre of this circle. As it then enlarges, the edge of this circle appears straight because the circumference is so large. A bit like saying the earth is flat, no it’s just large

    • @sergey1519
      @sergey1519 Рік тому +5

      ​@@Beschaulichkeit "curvature is inversely proportional to the radius" is the magic words

    • @Beschaulichkeit
      @Beschaulichkeit Рік тому

      @@sergey1519 Thank you!

  • @NVpcGuy
    @NVpcGuy 2 роки тому +4

    I would love to see you guys do a collab with the Hydraulic Press Channel! His slow-mo shots are often inadequate to show the detail of the explosions he creates by crushing things and I think it would be awesome to get your cameras to show some of his explosions in super slow-mo!

  • @andrewclarkehomeimprovement
    @andrewclarkehomeimprovement 2 роки тому +10

    This never gets old.
    You could start a 2nd channel where you do ultra timelapses.

  • @cmkeelDIM
    @cmkeelDIM 6 місяців тому +1

    Fastest cartridge out there is the .220 Swift without getting into wildcat stuff you have to make yourself. Swift is moving faster than 4,250 fps/1300 mps. You can get it to 4500fps with a hot reload, but it's already faster than the tempered glass medium.

  • @ERIKFENNER-bz9np
    @ERIKFENNER-bz9np 2 роки тому +34

    I would love to see a comparison of how fast glass breaks and bullets travel in water. Honestly I would be curious just to see glass breaking in slow motion under water.

    • @mhhuusko
      @mhhuusko 2 роки тому +4

      What are you expecting? The bullet stops in a foot or so and the glass breaks at the same speed as in air.

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому

      they dont travel in water

  • @UncleManuel
    @UncleManuel 2 роки тому +14

    Dan had me in stitches at using his eyebrowes as sunshades... 😂😂😂

  • @sitschi3949
    @sitschi3949 2 роки тому +19

    You could try Darts hitting a dart board wayyy to fast! That would look cool in (macro) slow motion as well :p

  • @randyvangeest1429
    @randyvangeest1429 7 місяців тому +1

    Kentucky Ballistic is where you want to go for speed

  • @filipmusialek6315
    @filipmusialek6315 2 роки тому +6

    I’ve been spinning coins a lot recently and no matter how hard I try I can’t wrap my head around how it would look when they hit each other and ultimately either both fall or one fall, I think it would be really interesting to see what it would look like when they hit each other and what the factors are which result in one or both coins falling down

  • @akariaTXreaper
    @akariaTXreaper 2 роки тому +4

    This is really cool. I would love to see the comparison of the speed of an explosion/fire spreading compared to these as well (i.e. via a shape charge or something)

  • @xxfalconarasxx5659
    @xxfalconarasxx5659 2 роки тому +1

    It should be noted that the bullet velocity would vary by the type of bullet and gun it is fired from. For example, most rifles will fire the bullet at speeds of about 2-3 times faster than most pistol rounds can. Not that it would be able to beat the glass. The speed of the glass shattering would probably still beat most rifles, but it would be a much closer match. The only handheld weapon that I know of that could probably beat the glass shatter is the Steyr IWS 2000. It's an anti-materiel rifle that fires a subcaliber APFSDS round that travels at speeds of about 1500 m/s. The 5.56×56mmSR (.220 Swift) rifle round might come close at 1300 m/s, but not quite enough to beat the glass.

    • @WayStedYou
      @WayStedYou 2 роки тому

      if you hand load a 220 swift to 30 grains you can hit 4650+ fps

  • @georgwrede7715
    @georgwrede7715 2 роки тому +10

    I can look up things like bullet speeds and glass cracking speed, and a week later I wouldn't remember them. Here I see it in Reality and I will never ever forget which is faster. -- Knowledge persistence on a totally other level. ❤