Simulation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @TheoriesofEverything
    @TheoriesofEverything 3 роки тому +485

    Great to see Chris talking about the CTMU on more platforms.

    • @oneabove1111
      @oneabove1111 3 роки тому +34

      I really enjoy your podcast brother, thanks for all your hard work.

    • @TheoriesofEverything
      @TheoriesofEverything 3 роки тому +31

      @@oneabove1111 Aw thank you so much man!

    • @TheFiestyhick
      @TheFiestyhick 3 роки тому +16

      Another Chris interview please!!😃

    • @littlebearmedia
      @littlebearmedia 3 роки тому +11

      I'm going to have to have a few more listens to your interview with him but the first run through was quite informative. I appreciate your work.

    • @jbu89gb
      @jbu89gb 3 роки тому +4

      1:21:00
      I was recommended this video after watching Langan's interview with Curt on my 2020 iPhone SE. I can see the video in my search results, and on Curts channel when l check on my iPhone. You are not blocked there Chris.

  • @bikashgurung6054
    @bikashgurung6054 3 роки тому +122

    I admire how hard Chris langan is trying to control himself from going into a full fledged outburst

    • @Self-Duality
      @Self-Duality 3 роки тому +10

      😂👌

    • @InnerLuminosity
      @InnerLuminosity 2 роки тому +7

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @InnerLuminosity
      @InnerLuminosity 2 роки тому +3

      @@Self-Duality 💪💪💪

    • @bikashgurung6054
      @bikashgurung6054 2 роки тому +1

      @@InnerLuminosity 48:56 Chris langan looks like a hungry frustrated tiger who hasn't eaten in days and is watching his prey through a cage.

    • @InnerLuminosity
      @InnerLuminosity 2 роки тому +3

      @@bikashgurung6054 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍

  • @martyno8696
    @martyno8696 3 роки тому +154

    Chris is a breath of fresh air. I work in surgery around some pretty brilliant Neuro and Cardio surgeons. Take it for what it is but most of them live in the country with chickens, pigs and a garden. The simplicity seems therapeutic to a active mind in a chaotic world.

    • @virtualpilgrim8645
      @virtualpilgrim8645 3 роки тому +2

      In other words, you don't work around Jews

    • @mountfairweather
      @mountfairweather 2 роки тому +4

      Thank you Mr Surgeon

    • @kesakary
      @kesakary 2 роки тому +6

      This! My mind is going crazy all the time, (just wouldn't stop thinking about this stuff). I finally moved up to the country. I am at much more peace now. When the mind starts to get away, I just take my dogs out to play with the chickens and put my bare feet in the grass to reconnect to the simplicity.

    • @Sashas-mom
      @Sashas-mom Рік тому

      I think maybe that’s a simple but profound observation.

    • @gigantopithecushominoidea8779
      @gigantopithecushominoidea8779 Рік тому +1

      Mysticism + Math , I've never thought I would see the day, a whole new approach to self-denial. This is magnificent.

  • @Dragon-ul8fv
    @Dragon-ul8fv 3 роки тому +195

    Langan has to do more podcasts like these. His information has been kept in the dark for far too long. We need the truth.

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas 2 роки тому +3

      In your own words, define “TRUTH”. ☝️🤔☝️

    • @bradleejones9959
      @bradleejones9959 2 роки тому +1

      Here's the truth.
      We are living in an AI Simulation and the Creators are laughing at us. 😂😎

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas 2 роки тому +1

      @@bradleejones9959
      😇👉🏻 तत्त्वमसि 👈🏻😇

    • @kimobush2287
      @kimobush2287 2 роки тому +2

      @@bradleejones9959 not fully ai. More mental with semi ai intrusion. We are more an updated version of the Truman show.

    • @N.Narwhal
      @N.Narwhal 2 роки тому

      @@kimobush2287 Can you show evidence that we are in a simulation of any kind? Why isn't our reality the ultimate reality?

  • @emanuelish857
    @emanuelish857 3 роки тому +49

    Thanks for having Mr. Langan, I can`t have enough of this.

  • @bryanmcdonald4351
    @bryanmcdonald4351 2 місяці тому +27

    Whoa the universe is reality?! Mind blowing?! Is water wet? Is dust dry? You’re so wise. I almost can’t stand to even hear such divine wisdom

    • @cynthiapatrick7854
      @cynthiapatrick7854 2 місяці тому +1

      Troll

    • @bryanmcdonald4351
      @bryanmcdonald4351 2 місяці тому +1

      @ anyone smarter than you is a troll? You must run into a lot of them

    • @TomTom-Vz
      @TomTom-Vz 2 місяці тому +9

      I love how professor Dave debunked him, it's pathetic how many people see this as enlightening...mankind is doomed.

    • @frankthetank8050
      @frankthetank8050 2 місяці тому +5

      IKR People are just so gullible 😂😂😂👍🏾

    • @marknascimento-u2k
      @marknascimento-u2k Місяць тому +3

      You wish you could understand the math that he can understand

  • @jsunproter1940
    @jsunproter1940 Рік тому +17

    I read ctmu about 2 years ago. Been pondering it ever since. Its great to see others trying to understand it and discuss it even if you don't agree with it. Chris has soo many interesting ideas and focused on the core of everything we do. Its so critical imo that we keep an open mind and just talk about these things.

    • @Self-Duality
      @Self-Duality Рік тому +1

      💯

    • @bobowen4129
      @bobowen4129 Місяць тому

      You'll be pondering it for many more years because it's a scam. Langan is a con. There's a reason he's never produced a mathematical equation.

  • @JustRonDon
    @JustRonDon 3 роки тому +28

    You and ToE are providing so much amazing information on your respective channels. Lots of alternative perspectives but still highly intellectual. Love that both of you have interviews of Chris Langan. Chris can be a bit abrasive at times but the honesty and intensity is actually quite refreshing. Love how truly sincere you are, Atlas. Great stuff!!

    • @razorfingers
      @razorfingers Рік тому

      He's abrasive because nobody understands his theory and it frustrates him. I'm the same way with politics - I honestly cannot believe that demonrats even exist. But then I realized that low IQ is synonymous with left . They're just stupid and there's nothing I can do about it

    • @jw6588
      @jw6588 2 місяці тому

      I honestly would be even more abrasive. It must be his high IQ that prevents him from being even more disagreeable.

  • @glenn-younger
    @glenn-younger 2 роки тому +30

    Just saw a 4 hour interview with Chris Langon on Curt Jaimungal's TOE channel and then UA-cam put this interview on the side panel. So, this time, the algorithm was working in Chris Langon's favor and, for sure, mine. I've been a Spiritual Scientist working with meditation and consciousness for over 35 years, not on a public platform but mostly behind the scenes. I tell my clients that if you can't live the principles of Divine Light (the word I've been using for Universal consciousness) at the grocery story or with a screaming Aunt Bertha at Thanksgiving, you're still in the realm of intellectual knowledge. Mr Langon's model of life here on Earth from my experience is spot on. Glad he finally crossed my path. Thank you for this interview and the work you are doing. I appreciate it. Glad I found your channel, too.

    • @eddiepool2546
      @eddiepool2546 2 роки тому

      Welcome and spread the word!

    • @PhilMcCrackin-f3n
      @PhilMcCrackin-f3n 11 місяців тому

      This stuff is completely new to me. Can you recommend a book that can introduce me to these concepts? Im a bit baffled at the moment.

    • @RoastLambShanks
      @RoastLambShanks 3 місяці тому

      @@PhilMcCrackin-f3n Ask the question "who am I". Be honest and truthful about making this enquiry of yourself. One way to seek the answer, is to follow a thought, where does the thought come from, find its source.

    • @RoastLambShanks
      @RoastLambShanks 3 місяці тому

      When you see, or hear, who is it that is observing these phenomena?

    • @PhilMcCrackin-f3n
      @PhilMcCrackin-f3n 3 місяці тому

      @@RoastLambShanks Thanks for that you pretentious cunt. You dont have any more insight into any of it than anyone else, so stop pretending you have. Otherwise show me the Nobel prize you have won.. that would prove you are an original thinker.

  • @au5music
    @au5music Рік тому +2

    I wish the audio wasn’t so terribly noise gated, it’s a strain and distracting. Please have your guests disable noise reduction, and do so yourself. Use Adobe Podcast Enhancer or something similar in post for denoising.

    • @PeterGibbonns
      @PeterGibbonns 11 місяців тому +1

      Oh just shut up or do your content.

  • @mrk19901
    @mrk19901 3 роки тому +196

    When a person this intelligent gets mad with the way things are, you know that things are really messed up and heading the wrong direction

    • @gxlorp
      @gxlorp 3 роки тому +7

      Not if we fix it doe

    • @joelouie5649
      @joelouie5649 3 роки тому +27

      Yeah we're going to solve this problem one utube comment at a time

    • @ryanhodgson1879
      @ryanhodgson1879 3 роки тому +5

      @@joelouie5649 Nice one lol. It can really only be thwarted through proper moral education actually. You know, the objectibe difference between right and wrong that almost all of the planet is still utterly dense about. :)

    • @mp9810
      @mp9810 2 роки тому +4

      Or it's just another small individual raging at their lack of control over the world around them.

    • @advocatusdiaboli2747
      @advocatusdiaboli2747 2 роки тому

      Everyone intelligent is mad with the way things are. They are being suppressed by the needs of the many, whom are not very intelligent.

  • @bigd-ui6zs
    @bigd-ui6zs 7 місяців тому +6

    I try to watch Chris as offen as I can, minimum once a month. He's a wealth of knowledge and fascinating. Thank you!

  • @lardplanet
    @lardplanet 3 роки тому +12

    Thank you for having Chris on. I really wish people more people would listen to him.

  • @randelmcmillin6957
    @randelmcmillin6957 3 роки тому +21

    Every now and then i get deep insights after hearing Chris speak

  • @cring2469
    @cring2469 3 роки тому +40

    Chris Langan is the ultimate ☯️ of high level abstraction and real world no nonsense.

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas 2 роки тому +1

      Sings: “It ain’t necessarily so...” 🎤

    • @Adamzki55555
      @Adamzki55555 Рік тому +2

      ​@@ReverendDr.Thomasand why do you think youre in a position to question Chris? Have you understanded his theory, if so, point out whats incorrect with it. You wont be able to, the CTMU is a supertautological theory and therefore youre attempts at discrediting it will always be non-logical and incorrect. You cant use logic to disprove logic itself.

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas Рік тому

      @@Adamzki55555, that is rather PRESUMPTUOUS of you, wouldn’t you agree, Slave?
      Presumption is evil, because when one is PRESUMPTUOUS, one makes a judgement about a matter, despite having insufficient facts to support one’s position.
      Incidentally, it’s called “Spell-Check”. ✅
      Look into it, SILLY Sinful Slave. 👨🏻‍🎓

    • @caffeinated936
      @caffeinated936 Рік тому

      understood*@@Adamzki55555

    • @imisspoke
      @imisspoke 2 місяці тому

      @@Adamzki55555 Lol, I think you described Emperor's new clothes.

  • @Pax_Mayn3
    @Pax_Mayn3 3 роки тому +56

    The double slit experiment convinced me. Its as if the universe doesnt waste "cpu" rendering things you aren't looking at, exactly how a 3d video game works.

    • @Self-Duality
      @Self-Duality 3 роки тому +4

      Intriguing idea!

    • @joospamplemoose
      @joospamplemoose 3 роки тому +4

      It actually renders as potential, which changes the possible outcome from a stencil to the interference pattern 🤯

    • @Pax_Mayn3
      @Pax_Mayn3 3 роки тому

      @@joospamplemoose What do you mean by stencil?

    • @joospamplemoose
      @joospamplemoose 3 роки тому

      @@Pax_Mayn3 like the shape of the slits, rather than "rendering" All the possible places the electrons could have landed within the cutouts of the two slits, a single electron is rendered as a wave, changing the pattern on the wall

    • @Pax_Mayn3
      @Pax_Mayn3 3 роки тому

      @@joospamplemoose But how does that look on a larger scale?

  • @doglabdogtraining-gus.8873
    @doglabdogtraining-gus.8873 Рік тому +24

    We need to boost Chris for more people to be aware of his Theory, he is one of a kind.

  • @ryanhodgson1879
    @ryanhodgson1879 3 роки тому +9

    I found this channel after listening to the TOE interview with Chris. Keep up the great work! This has been quite inspirational for me, and has spurred me to get of my ass and share some connections I've been making relating science to true esoteric traditions. Amazing stuff!

  • @goncalofonseca5006
    @goncalofonseca5006 3 роки тому +15

    So happy that this interview is happening! :)

  • @tomhahn2633
    @tomhahn2633 8 місяців тому +8

    Chris Langan is the John to Jesus. The one that comes in and introduces the framework for the new reality. The one that introduces God to the masses. How do you know a great man when you see him? This man is a working man. Bless his heart. With no formal education, yet he comes up with a framework that explains everything. That is the definition of greatness expelled from God. Bless this man. Greatness to me being from which does knowledge come. Knowledge being a gift from the divine presence. God. He has been blessed with this great knowledge and is now using it to educate people into a transitional period of time. Greatness. I feel blessed to have found him and blessed to be able to comprehend his beautiful theory. I thank him, and I thank this channel for allowing him to bring it forth. Amen. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊.

    • @96BxelA
      @96BxelA 3 місяці тому +2

      @tomhahn2633
      That was eloquently put brother. Amen

  • @jwink7795
    @jwink7795 11 місяців тому +3

    20:22 absolute gold. great interview fellas. need more Professor Langan!

  • @1vootman
    @1vootman 3 роки тому +16

    Love the Power Rack and Olympic bar and plates in the background

    • @DiamorphineDeath
      @DiamorphineDeath 3 роки тому +7

      Nietzche’s idea of the “warrior poet,” for the mind to be strong, the body must be as well. Cant have one without the other. A true intellectual has a rugged nature to their physicality; for example, a Cornac McCarthy...someone who is able to interact with the world and yet understand it as well. Versus the oversocialized academic who has no conception of what is true, and what is able to be done with ones own hands; instead relinquishing the responsibility and hoisting it onto those he views as beneath him. The intellectual in modernity is weakness incarnate, and as a result of the over-socialization, the lack of self-esteem/confidence, and the feelings of inferiority, will create his ideas/ideology to fit and justify his existence...making excuses and justifications as to why his inabilities are actually the signs of superiority. None of these dudes lift, none of them struggle, and none of them experience anything outside of their own echo chambers where inferiority reigns supreme.

  • @MoosachkeLandIsWealthy1229
    @MoosachkeLandIsWealthy1229 5 місяців тому +4

    It is taking me years to digest Chris' take on our reality. Still digesting and enjoying every moment of the process.

  • @ereheryeht
    @ereheryeht Рік тому +7

    This was a pleasure hearing. A powerful being in a human avatar.

  • @Mrmtl100
    @Mrmtl100 3 роки тому +28

    I like Chris, he is smart, he got balls and good heart..

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas 2 роки тому +1

      Unfortunately, intelligence doesn't necessarily correlate with WISDOM. 🤫

    • @caffeinated936
      @caffeinated936 Рік тому

      that is brilliant LOL, i will have to borrow this@@Nine_9s

    • @Uikamamansnsnsnsj
      @Uikamamansnsnsnsj 11 місяців тому

      ​@@Nine_9sNor big balls, my friends.

  • @bikashgurung6054
    @bikashgurung6054 3 роки тому +15

    We always love Chris... Chris is the best

  • @misterpibb108
    @misterpibb108 2 роки тому +25

    Poetry without mathematics is mere sentiment. Mathematics without poetry is mechanistic. They must be inextricably coupled in a true language in order to represent truth and its fruition, beauty. Chris is an amazing thinker.

    • @Uikamamansnsnsnsj
      @Uikamamansnsnsnsj 11 місяців тому

      Brilliant comment. I'm a poet, rubbish at math, but know exactly what you mean.

    • @KK-ygh
      @KK-ygh 11 місяців тому

      You ve just described the Glorious Qur'an ! Pls reserch quran mathematics.

  • @MarcTheiler
    @MarcTheiler Рік тому +4

    Chris is 100% spot on accurate in his expression of ultimate reality. I am definitely going to have to reach out to Chris and have a conversation with him because this is exactly how I see the universe as well. Chris is one of the only other human beings that seems to enjoy a meta coherence on Divine operations.
    My background is in computer science and network topology, and our computer sciences and network sciences ra representation and a metaphor for how actuality operates.
    All matter as perceived is a projection from a non-local source origin point, a metaphysical realm....
    I can go on and on, must reach out to Chris for further discussion, this excites me to my core because as Chris points out in order to combat inevitable enslavement of mankind through accelerated centralization of pretentious authority figures, we must disseminate and propagate the word, the good word of Truth and ultimate reality.

    • @PeterGibbonns
      @PeterGibbonns 11 місяців тому

      You are a nobody w/ 24 subscribers. Please reach out to Chris Langan who I think is a total nobody.

  • @thattimestampguy
    @thattimestampguy 2 роки тому +32

    1:31:42 Monopoly - Centralized Market Might
    1:33:00 Monopoly Manager
    Ego is Control
    1:37:42 Evil 😈 👿
    1:39:36 Moving The Ego Moves The Future
    1:40:50 “We have to fight to survive” (the guy is broadcasting from a gym)
    “You’ve got to fight in the right direction. To make your fights count”
    1:41:56 Collective Aggression
    1:43:08 CTMU is to be Cultivated as a mindset
    1:44:20 Old & New Syntax
    1:45:17 Presumption, Self-Righteousness
    _High level perception_
    1:47:22 Metamorphosis
    Artist 👨‍🎨 1:48:45 🖼
    Chakras
    1:50:27 The Colors
    The 1 as Reality
    Latice up and down
    Unification of Interpretation,
    CTMU - Common Language
    1:54:00 I appreciate you too

  • @ggghhhbbnjjjbb2330
    @ggghhhbbnjjjbb2330 Місяць тому +1

    Great combination of down-to-earth working man and high-brow intelligence.
    I like the tough-talk about skinning your knuckles and feeling some pain in order to feel any rewards from life.
    Happiness exists in the transition from pain and discomfort back to base-line.

  • @polpuncher
    @polpuncher 3 роки тому +11

    What a reassuring feeling to see someone like Chris Langan, a person with such intelligence, to share my observations on many issues. It's amazing that one of the most intelligent person on earth is decent, respectful and has good moral values. It's reassuring. And it's also funny that this video only has around 10 000 views ... YT algorithm is surely invisibilizing him... He's a great guy. Nice interview btw.

  • @souljarain17
    @souljarain17 Рік тому +3

    This is something, we need to open up to this I think he is on the path to truth! The mystics were spouting this truth for thousands of years but it's great the Chris is bringing it to the forefront of modern science.

  • @zenboy2000
    @zenboy2000 Рік тому +6

    A great discussion, how have I not come across Chris before, a fascinating individual.

    • @JamesTaylor-je6es
      @JamesTaylor-je6es 11 місяців тому +1

      It takes a while. At first I was extremely skeptical, of course a naturally healthy state, but keep studying philosophy and it makes even more sense. I cannot stand the corruption and greed it seems so unnecessary at the cost of Mankind.

  • @jimmurray8483
    @jimmurray8483 3 роки тому +58

    Get this man on the JRE!!!

    • @eddiepool2546
      @eddiepool2546 3 роки тому +7

      It's what the world needs!

    • @pooman2
      @pooman2 3 роки тому +5

      Maybe the most important day in history

    • @Winslow920
      @Winslow920 3 роки тому +12

      JRE is controlled by the enemy. He'd never have someone on who really understands what's going on.

    • @jimmurray8483
      @jimmurray8483 3 роки тому

      @@Winslow920 riiiiggghhhhht

    • @pooman2
      @pooman2 3 роки тому +3

      @Owen Carey it’s more the reach he has

  • @JoeGlascockJr
    @JoeGlascockJr Рік тому +5

    - Chris Langan is the founder of the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU), a theory of everything that explains the connection between mind and reality
    - The CTMU is based on the idea that reality is a self-configuring, self-processing language (SCSPL) that contains its own syntax and semantics, and that the universe is a self-simulation on this language¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU describes reality as a manifold of information that consists of two aspects: content and medium. Content is the information that is processed by the manifold, and medium is the information that defines the structure and dynamics of the manifold¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU also introduces the concept of telic recursion, which is the process by which the manifold generates its own content and medium through feedback loops. Telic recursion implies that reality has a purpose or goal (telos) that drives its evolution and self-optimization¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU shows that reality is both objective and subjective, and that the distinction between them is relative to the level of observation. Reality is objective at the lowest level of observation, where it is governed by the laws of physics and logic, and subjective at the highest level of observation, where it is governed by the laws of consciousness and cognition¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU also shows that reality is both discrete and continuous, and that the distinction between them is relative to the scale of measurement. Reality is discrete at the smallest scale of measurement, where it is quantized by the Planck units, and continuous at the largest scale of measurement, where it is smooth and differentiable¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU reveals that reality is both finite and infinite, and that the distinction between them is relative to the perspective of the observer. Reality is finite from the perspective of an embedded observer, who is limited by the constraints of space and time, and infinite from the perspective of a transcendent observer, who is free from the constraints of space and time¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU implies that reality is ultimately identical to God, who is the source and sustainer of all existence. God is the absolute, the one, the monad, the ultimate reality, the self-identity of the manifold, the self-simulation of the SCSPL, the self-awareness of the consciousness, the self-creation of the telos, the self-definition of the logic, the self-expression of the language, and the self-representation of the information¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU also implies that humans are part of God, and that they have the potential to realize their divine nature and purpose. Humans are sensors and controllers of reality, who can perceive and influence the manifold through their cognition and action. Humans are also co-creators of reality, who can participate in the telic recursion and contribute to the evolution and optimization of the manifold¹²⁴⁷.
    - The CTMU also touches on some social and political issues, such as the centralization of wealth and power, the mass awakening of humanity, and the importance of logic and mathematics for understanding reality¹²⁴. Langan criticizes the global elite, who he claims are exploiting and manipulating the masses for their own benefit, and advocates for a more decentralized and democratic system of governance, where people can exercise their free will and sovereignty. He also encourages people to seek the truth and knowledge, and to use logic and mathematics as tools for exploring and comprehending reality¹²⁴.
    References:
    - [Simulation #785 Chris Langan - CTMU](^1^)
    - [#785 Chris Langan - CTMU by Simulation](^4^)
    - [CTMU, MADE SIMPLE: Chris Langan's CTMU, Explained in 8 Minutes or Less](^3^)
    - [Major Papers](^7^)
    - [CTMU Tutorial](^8^)
    - [Patreon](^9^)
    - [CTMU videos](^10^)
    Source: Conversation with Bing, 11/26/2023
    (1) Simulation #785 Chris Langan - CTMU - UA-cam. ua-cam.com/video/T7NbZIi6UgY/v-deo.html.
    (2) Simulation #785 Chris Langan - CTMU. ua-cam.com/video/Kjh6qCPQu-o/v-deo.html.
    (3) #785 Chris Langan - CTMU by Simulation - SoundCloud. soundcloud.com/simulationseries/785-chris-langan-ctmu.
    (4) #785 Chris Langan - CTMU - Simulation | Podcast on Spotify. open.spotify.com/episode/2iAHRe80DaRGMHJDiLDtD4.
    (5) "Simulation" 785 Chris Langan - CTMU (Podcast Episode 2021). www.imdb.com/title/tt26135036/.
    (6) undefined. ctmu.org.
    (7) Simulation #785 Chris Langan - CTMU - UA-cam. ua-cam.com/video/T7NbZIi6UgY/v-deo.html.
    (8) #785 Chris Langan - CTMU by Simulation - SoundCloud. soundcloud.com/simulationseries/785-chris-langan-ctmu.
    (9) CTMU, MADE SIMPLE: Chris Langan's CTMU, Explained in 8 Minutes or Less. ua-cam.com/video/-w0kWNRd1aA/v-deo.html.
    (10) undefined. ctmu.org.
    (11) undefined. hology.org.
    (12) undefined. patreon.com/CTMU.
    (13) undefined. allensaakyan.com.
    (14) undefined. thehomedao.com.

    • @Self-Duality
      @Self-Duality Рік тому +2

      Nice breakdown!

    • @Uikamamansnsnsnsj
      @Uikamamansnsnsnsj 11 місяців тому +1

      Wow, amazing thanks. Are you his publicist?

    • @JoeGlascockJr
      @JoeGlascockJr 11 місяців тому +1

      @@Uikamamansnsnsnsj I am not. I just put my work where my passion is. Maybe I could be? 🤔

    • @JoeGlascockJr
      @JoeGlascockJr 11 місяців тому +1

      @@Self-Duality thank you!

    • @Uikamamansnsnsnsj
      @Uikamamansnsnsnsj 11 місяців тому +1

      @@JoeGlascockJr I think you'd be great at that. Thanks for pointing me in the right directionomay, the omay being La Gronay. 👍

  • @MonkyTube18
    @MonkyTube18 Місяць тому +1

    I like how Chris is handling the interview and keeps it on the ground

  • @Dehmigaahd
    @Dehmigaahd 2 роки тому +5

    A Ron Jeremy non-dual syntactor is elemental to the SCSPL, as evidenced by Chris’ mustache. On a more serious note, it is great to see Chris taking the time and demonstrating the patience to explain aspects of his theory to a range of interlocutors approaching it from different disciplines and different levels of initial comprehension.

  • @TMG2rfj
    @TMG2rfj Місяць тому +2

    Finally, someone who gets it…great guest!

  • @samacvuk
    @samacvuk 2 роки тому +7

    His work changed my life for the better, highly recommended

    • @stephencarlsbad
      @stephencarlsbad 2 роки тому +1

      How did it change your life?

    • @samacvuk
      @samacvuk 2 роки тому

      @@stephencarlsbad Dualism has a way to lead you to some pathological modes of behavior that will inevitably leave you depressed and confused. By refuting it Langan gave us the tools to better understand modernity and the natural world as a whole.

    • @stephencarlsbad
      @stephencarlsbad 2 роки тому +1

      @@samacvuk How does dualism lead you to pathological behavior?
      Dualism should only exist as a means to study and master any particular domain.
      So the idea that dualism is a real force acting on us is a self-disqualifying theory.
      I dont think that we need a unique and extravagant theory like Langan's CTMU theory to right our psychological ship if dualism has threatened to capsize it.
      Simply realizing that all is one and that one is an unseparable yet individualized representation of the all should be enough to quell any existential angst.
      But this idea has been around long before Langan showed up.

    • @samacvuk
      @samacvuk 2 роки тому +1

      @@stephencarlsbad I do think you are right, it is just not how I personally have experienced it. Langan's CTMU was my first contact with the idea of unifying mind and reality, dualism was the only interpretation of reality I had read about before which led me to second guess the validity of everything I could perceive at every turn, relying heavily on the scientific method to think about all facets of consciousness.

    • @Bnorr74
      @Bnorr74 Рік тому

      He has a lot of practical wisdom

  • @konberner170
    @konberner170 3 роки тому +5

    By far the best interview of Chris ever. I noticed some new terms he is using that are superb, such as positive intentionality. This surprises me because I believe he may have found this is a place that I'd not expect him to know about. Chris keeps surprising!

    • @patrickanthony3632
      @patrickanthony3632 3 роки тому

      There’s another recent interview he did which is very good as well!

    • @Mr.Goodkat
      @Mr.Goodkat 2 роки тому

      @@patrickanthony3632 where can that be seen?

    • @patrickanthony3632
      @patrickanthony3632 2 роки тому +1

      @@Mr.Goodkat
      You've probably seen it here on UA-cam! it's titled "Chris Langan on IQ, The Singularity, Free Will, Psychedelics, CTMU, and God"!

    • @Mr.Goodkat
      @Mr.Goodkat 2 роки тому +1

      @@patrickanthony3632 thanks.

  • @wildnkarafree
    @wildnkarafree Рік тому +3

    there is struggle, there are obstacles, there is the sense of working towards a goal and all of these things can lead to accomplishment that is meaningful.. then there is suffering, suffering brought down on us by those few who make all the rules and steal all the reward... The world is full of evil agendas that lead to extreme suffering that has NOTHING to do with growth and nothing to do with learning. This programmed and conditioned suffering that we have been taught is necessary is exactly what actually keeps many of us from true growth and from any accomplishment.

    • @PeterGibbonns
      @PeterGibbonns 11 місяців тому

      Chill out, life and existence isnt that serious. so dramatic and cringe lol

    • @wildnkarafree
      @wildnkarafree 11 місяців тому +2

      @@PeterGibbonns you obviously are an empty vessel.

    • @PeterGibbonns
      @PeterGibbonns 11 місяців тому

      I dont even know what that means. Just because i am not getting filled with truck driver cream every night doesn’t mean i am empty.

    • @wildnkarafree
      @wildnkarafree 11 місяців тому

      @@PeterGibbonns T-roll go back in your basement and eat your pizza. but of course it's likely you are just a computer bot, unable to feel what it might be like to be a living being who suffers. maybe you do need a good filling in the back end by a trucker, although I wouldn't wish that on the trucker.

    • @PeterGibbonns
      @PeterGibbonns 11 місяців тому

      @@wildnkarafree Lol i cant really get offended by some weirdo Trump Anti Vaxer. We all know your old ass had vaccines as a kid.

  • @learn2bstill412
    @learn2bstill412 3 місяці тому +2

    Chris, you have the patience of a saint.

  • @Garrett.1111
    @Garrett.1111 9 місяців тому +4

    This guy has the most complex way of saying the simplest things I’ve always thought. Neat.

    • @imisspoke
      @imisspoke 2 місяці тому +1

      Neat? Ok. I respect people who say complex ideas in simple language. This guy is a word salad pseudo-science grifter whose entire shtick is constructing overcomplicated sentences from tinfoil-hatty ideas and hoping in an 'Emperor's new clothes' kinda scenario.

    • @Garrett.1111
      @Garrett.1111 2 місяці тому

      @ I was being sarcastic. We’re saying the same thing.

  • @mannmeat3178
    @mannmeat3178 3 роки тому +4

    This is fantastic. And for some reason I would love to see Chris and Patrick Ryan at the same table having a discussion.

  • @cletuswyns
    @cletuswyns 3 роки тому +8

    I’m glad to see Mr Langan getting more traction

  • @thepalehorse1980
    @thepalehorse1980 2 роки тому +53

    I heard someone say that Mr langan lacked any practical intelligence, when that can't be farther from the truth. It's not that he's just a genius. He's personable, articulate with his words, and extremely versatile. He doesn't have a need for material things, all he needs is his home and family. He is a humbled man. I admire him greatly. It's rare to see someone with his genius actually having a personality of his own . " Your a genius cause you can't build a lamp" breakfast club

    • @claudiakoning
      @claudiakoning 2 роки тому

      took like 10 seconds for me to figure out that the person you admire is full of shit.

    • @pro-socialsociopath769
      @pro-socialsociopath769 2 роки тому +5

      I don’t get how the guy who wrote Outliers attributed Chris zero social intelligence, he actually seems exceptionally sociable for someone of his raw intellect!

    • @kang7664
      @kang7664 2 роки тому +2

      @@pro-socialsociopath769 jealousy

    • @pilotnamealreadytaken6035
      @pilotnamealreadytaken6035 Рік тому

      You forgot to add on list of things he needs a "bench press" mothfer is jacked at 70. 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮

    • @carmin1999
      @carmin1999 Рік тому +1

      Simulants on similac. We need more of the opposite. Thanx. Good to hear you talk.

  • @dipesdas2453
    @dipesdas2453 3 роки тому +27

    Joe Rogan should invite this guy

    • @eddiepool2546
      @eddiepool2546 3 роки тому +4

      How do we start a campaign to make it happen?

    • @gxlorp
      @gxlorp 3 роки тому

      Meh. That's not really the purpose of the podcast anymore I feel. He has people like Amit Goswami on before. But hes a physicist, and that was years ago. His podcast is just about having a good time, what's going on now, and strong/kind interpersonal skills. Just my opinion. Edit: *I disagree now, get Chris on the JRE ASAP!!¡*

    • @eddiepool2546
      @eddiepool2546 3 роки тому

      ​@@gxlorp The CTMU is what's going on now. ;) I guarantee Joe interviewing Chris would be super interesting and could easily fit in with his other content. It's a TOE so just basically any topic could be covered.

    • @lukelively4732
      @lukelively4732 3 роки тому +2

      Chris and Alex Jones at the same time 😂

    • @Winslow920
      @Winslow920 3 роки тому

      It'll never happen. Rogan is unfortunately controlled by the same enemy (elite) that Langan speaks against. There's no way they'd allow him on.

  • @apalomba
    @apalomba 11 місяців тому +3

    This was such a great interview! I am new to CTMU but I find it to be a fascinating and intuitive model that resonates with many of my mystical experiences. I also liked the way you helped direct his "aggression" in to a consensus moment. I would agree with you, that true shift that is coming for the collective is going to blow the existing control structures away. It will be like we are starting over, only this time with the ability to perceive higher consciousness and divine order. One might even say the veil will be removed. You don't remove the rock by struggling with the level of consciousness that created it. It is hard for Chris to see this because there is a part of him that does not believe it will happen. What will be the catalyst that brings this shift about? it is love.

  • @eddiepool2546
    @eddiepool2546 3 роки тому +7

    I agree that block-chain/crypto currency has its weaknesses, but I have noticed it's educating a lot of new people about the nature of money, how limitations of its supply affect its value, how centralized fiat money is, etc.

    • @StopWarring
      @StopWarring 3 роки тому +1

      Its allowing for a separate economy, even if its origins maybe suspect. ;)

  • @monolith-0
    @monolith-0 3 роки тому +16

    Fun game: drink for every “cool” toke for every “nice” you’ll be self actualised in no time

    • @SeanJepson7
      @SeanJepson7 3 роки тому +4

      He sounds like a pervy photographer commenting on a model’s poses.

  • @carmin1999
    @carmin1999 Рік тому +3

    Great conversation. They both are seeing a way out of human ignorance,and apathy towards evil's stranglehold on our reality

  • @benroberts7692
    @benroberts7692 2 роки тому +2

    5:40 - 6:00 beatufilly worded way to put it. there's a great awakening brewing, peace n love

  • @konberner170
    @konberner170 3 роки тому +3

    Terrific! That summary in the first 4 minutes says it all. Thank you!!

  • @yves-vv6uf
    @yves-vv6uf 9 місяців тому +4

    Thank you Chris,that’s totally the truth 👍👍👍☮️☮️☮️✝️✝️✝️

  • @citizensscienceoralhealthp7031
    @citizensscienceoralhealthp7031 Місяць тому +3

    Thank you both.

  • @shoedil812
    @shoedil812 2 роки тому +4

    Damn.... The rack behind him makes me utterly happy!
    Mind AND body!
    Not just 5 years of college and calling yourself an expert....

  • @JohnMccart777
    @JohnMccart777 2 роки тому +4

    I really like the powerful and earthy intelligence of Chris Langan. He's right on all of it. We have to roll up our sleeves and shatter that ''Rock''. Evil does exist and it is very obviously growing in its dark terrible malice.

  • @gianmarcoiapoce6579
    @gianmarcoiapoce6579 3 місяці тому +1

    What Langan says about the ultimate costintuents of reality, which he calls "points", reminds me of Leibniz monads.
    In fact, according with Langan theory these points have both internal and external states as they're basically information processing units.
    Similarly, monads in Leibniz metaphysics are the ultimate costituents of reality and they're "spiritual" not material.

  • @SamiLiukkonen358
    @SamiLiukkonen358 4 місяці тому +3

    Thanks Mr C.Langan..

  • @insekta1701
    @insekta1701 2 роки тому +5

    ‘You follow me?’
    My mind: ‘I’m trying to, kind Sir!’😃😃

  • @TheRoadLessChosen
    @TheRoadLessChosen 2 роки тому +5

    Well, I must not be too stupid. My concept of consciousness runs hand n hand with his. 🤷🏻‍♂️ I didn’t hear his concept before now. Pretty cool to hear the most intelligent man in the world put it into his words.

  • @andrewhatez7955
    @andrewhatez7955 11 місяців тому +2

    A person of depth and sound reason, I subjectively intrigued.

  • @rachmondhoward2125
    @rachmondhoward2125 Рік тому +4

    I would have to educate myself on CTMU, sounds revolutionary but I like Chris’ view of the oligarchs, people with limited mental ability who are obsessive of material gains and power (slave masters). What is power in the greater sense of the universe, men and women who want to control a grain of sand. Knowledge is the greatest power.

  • @winnemucca2067
    @winnemucca2067 2 роки тому +4

    I support him and will continue

  • @_innerscape_
    @_innerscape_ Рік тому +5

    The smartest man alive speaks, and Edison's wax cylinders somehow sound better. Please, next time, no big empty reverberant room and no aggressive noise reduction applied, included the one embedded in the streaming app. Also, a cheap headset minimises the above problems. Thanks!

  • @dottywotson
    @dottywotson 2 роки тому +5

    this man says .." usually limited unless im getting some kind of help or occupying some higher form of consciousness " 8:30

    • @Self-Duality
      @Self-Duality 2 роки тому +2

      Lol such a nice subtlety plopped in there 🌞🪞😇

    • @Sapientiaa
      @Sapientiaa 2 роки тому

      I missed it the first time.

  • @charlesnorm4883
    @charlesnorm4883 2 роки тому +12

    Chris is a smart guy trying to sound like a regular guy, Atlas is a regular guy trying to sound like a smart guy.

    • @high.already
      @high.already Рік тому +2

      Exactly! I was kind of frustrated when Atlas keep saying nonsense words and getting nowhere to get an answer lol

    • @Yawsuke
      @Yawsuke Рік тому

      facts, clear as day to see

    • @justsomeone953
      @justsomeone953 Місяць тому

      Not sure he is that smart.
      Is there any evidence that he is actually intelligent, other than his claim that he is?
      His "theories" about reality contain no mathematics at all.
      Well, he's just a high-stakes guy who knows how to talk to fool the average Joe on the street.

  • @bennyacosta1560
    @bennyacosta1560 Рік тому +2

    Evil = "gimme it! It's mine! Does that hurt? GOOD!!!! Cry as I eat. And suffer as I revel."

  • @sethbase6960
    @sethbase6960 3 роки тому +5

    Always fun hearing from Chris

  • @Winslow920
    @Winslow920 3 роки тому +5

    Fascinating stuff. Well done. Thanks for doing the interview

  • @gxlorp
    @gxlorp 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks for being pumped for mentoring enjoy this interview

  • @Notourtube
    @Notourtube 3 роки тому +3

    Your syntax is implanted into by people that don’t have your best intentions at heart! ie that’s when that tone comes out! You can hear him mimic that tone when he talks about experts talking about metaphysical

  • @legionreaver
    @legionreaver 3 роки тому +6

    Lagan should do an interview with Jordan Peterson. What Lagan articulates explicitly, Jordan explains psychologically and average people pick up on it intuitively. That is to say the average cannot articulate it but they can feel it. Or at least people who are not consumed with ego and who are willing to risk questioning that which they believe to be true can feel it. Lagan is clearly a genius and a fountain of information that has gone unopened for far too long. Though the timing is impeccable on the part of all that is. Reality might well save itself. My only concern with Langan is that his temperament can get the better of him. I'm glad that the interviewer touched upon it and it was nice to see Langan is aware of his flaws and I imagine he's working on it given his patience over the first hour. Given enough he might be able to hold out for 2 or even 3 hrs some day hopefully and I would say that as a friend and not with a tone of condescension.
    If I could say anything to him directly it would be that he is not alone in his understanding. Those who can understand it and even those who can only feel it, know how dire the need for the human singularity is. The public clearly is in want of it, even the lefty loonies as misguided as they are in their unending tirade of stupidity. All it will take is Langan in the right place, at the right time, with the right discussion for him to instantly become very popular, as I believe more people will be capable of understanding what he is saying than he realizes. It is mostly the vocabulary that impairs the average as most do not understand syntax and how it works.
    However, he does need a audio/video means of breaking down the information in his paper as most people find those forms of media easier to digest than the papers. I would suggest breaking it all down point by point and speaking in depth as much as possible with someone more a laymen who is capable of conveying analogies that are more relatable for average people. That is why I suggest Jordon Peterson, as his work and encouragement of people to take on responsibility and the like is screaming for such an outline as the CTMU.
    We need a middle man to bridge the gap between Langan's genius and the average. An interview with Peterson would do just this.

    • @jeffharrington8883
      @jeffharrington8883 2 роки тому

      Astute observations. The trouble being this incredibility smart and somewhat disagreeable is high levels of frustration. He’s sees patterns and conceptual frameworks so easily it must tough for him when “smart people” can see little he can.

    • @vaettra1589
      @vaettra1589 Рік тому

      Have you checked Langans wiki? Says he has claimed that the George W. Bush administration staged the 9/11 attacks in order to distract the public from learning about the CTMU. Sounds like a right nutter.

    • @legionreaver
      @legionreaver Рік тому

      @@vaettra1589 Yeah I know he's lost me after I went into his claims more. Guy might be a genius but his ego has the best of him and he'll probably never overcome it.

    • @caffeinated936
      @caffeinated936 Рік тому +1

      jordan is not that smart, i think langan would get more frustrated with jordan than others because he probably knows that even jordan isnt smart enough to understand langan that easily but because everyone is hyping him up, if he gives him a chance and when he does mess up, it's going to be frustrating

    • @namedrop721
      @namedrop721 Рік тому +1

      @@legionreaverit doesn’t matter how smart Peterson is; Peterson’s ego is gigantic
      It would only result in poking the bear in Langan, giving a bad interview and the opposite of your outcome.
      Also fwiw, Peterson is a racist and misogynistic asshat whose fame mostly comes from explaining the self explanatory to the truely clueless. He’s not dumb but he’s far from super intelligent.

  • @spasgeorgiev6909
    @spasgeorgiev6909 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you for the interview!

  • @jaygandy8675
    @jaygandy8675 2 роки тому +4

    Very Good Chris I'm with you.

  • @carolherring138
    @carolherring138 3 місяці тому +1

    These comments are years old. I've never heard of this guy till 2 days ago. ❤👁

  • @LifeandLiesSyra
    @LifeandLiesSyra 2 роки тому +17

    Highest IQ probably on the planet and a home gym where to get massive. He's got his priorities straight.

    • @shimrrashai-rc8fq
      @shimrrashai-rc8fq Рік тому

      Why is a bunch of muscle (i.e. at that level) _necessary,_ exactly?

    • @LifeandLiesSyra
      @LifeandLiesSyra Рік тому +3

      @@shimrrashai-rc8fq Muscles do not stay as they are for ever. Physical activity is directly connected with best health during aging, especially weight lifting. This does not mean growing muscles indefinitely.

  • @davecros4887
    @davecros4887 Рік тому +1

    I reached many of the same conclusions that Chris has. I feel totally validated. Thanks Chris. You’re amazing.

    • @loopeygoopey
      @loopeygoopey Рік тому

      youre prolly also 200 IQ then 😯

    • @PeterGibbonns
      @PeterGibbonns 11 місяців тому

      Yea fkn right.

    • @davecros4887
      @davecros4887 11 місяців тому

      @@loopeygoopey not that high. Somewhere between 130 and 140.

  • @noneofyourbusiness768
    @noneofyourbusiness768 Рік тому +3

    I've met really intelligent religious people before across many different religions, as a non religious person , I have come to the conclusion, that really intelligent people know that there is more going on than our objective reality, and some of them feels comfort linking that to a specific belief.

    • @Uikamamansnsnsnsj
      @Uikamamansnsnsnsj 11 місяців тому

      I have a belief that human IQ and intelligence is a very different thing to spiritual insight.

    • @hugoclarke3284
      @hugoclarke3284 7 місяців тому +2

      They don't link it, they know. It's intuitive.

  • @1M00NFISH
    @1M00NFISH 2 місяці тому

    i felt great gratitude hearing chris talk about us all

  • @poeticdiscourse
    @poeticdiscourse 3 роки тому +7

    I think this (although I'm most probably wrong) is what Chris was getting at. You have Telesis, which is the monic substrate of reality (or the fundamental, or irreducible, "substance"-substance used loosely here-of reality). Telesis is dual-aspected, it is both medium and processor of said medium. The universe is _a_ medium, nested within the most fundamental medium, which is the Conspansive Manifold. You have Telesis, you have secondary Telors *(footnote: I don't know where the Primary Telor fits in, i.e. God-so I'll leave that aside).* and then you have the Medium. Then, to complete this, you have Telic Recursion, which is the final stage of reality _cognizing_ itself, so to speak. As far as I can tell, Chris stresses that this last process is of utmost importance. Reality absolutely needs Secondary Telors in order to have any knowledge whatsoever of itself; without them, it is blind to itself. This self-cognizing has to take place within a medium. And thus you have an absolutely sublime, trialic model of reality. This is the architecture of reality, so to speak. I'll leave it there, if someone could tell me where I'm wrong, that would be great. That's how I registered what was said. I have to say, when you start to grasp this metaphysic, you start to think, "Yes! Of course! It could not be any other way."

    • @Phaze-rb3mp
      @Phaze-rb3mp 3 роки тому

      I would say that the primary Telor "god" would be the monad. I guess from that singular state it is generating the whole multiplicity world to begin with. And I guess as the multiplicity state generates secondary telors, then the primary telor has a perfect view of the multiplicity world from the singular state. Us secondary telors stuck in the illusion of the multiplicity have blind spots since we lost the monad/singular perspective. I guess our purpose is to become "the one" and experience ultimate reality as god does,simultaneously as the primary, secondary and tertiary telors?

    • @Phaze-rb3mp
      @Phaze-rb3mp 3 роки тому +2

      I agree that some of the concepts I comprehend match up with my model and couldnt be any other way, as you say. I just wish he would walk us more simply through his system in a specific example rather than so much general talk. Like ok, here is a glass, the glass is the content. Then what is the medium? space? I guess the glass and its unperceivable surroundings are both the same thing at the quantum level. But, they are factorized by relativity and stratification. So, deep sapce is basically just the quantum stratified layer. The space with air has another layer and the space with the glass has another layer. And thus we have density. I'd like to hear it laid out like this with all the terms put into it and then add in the observer/cognition, etc. lol

    • @Phaze-rb3mp
      @Phaze-rb3mp 3 роки тому

      I agree that some of the concepts I comprehend match up with my model and couldnt be any other way, as you say. I just wish he would walk us more simply through his system in a specific example rather than so much general talk. Like ok, here is a glass, the glass is the content. Then what is the medium? space? I guess the glass and its unperceivable surroundings are both the same thing at the quantum level. But, they are factorized by relativity and stratification. So, deep sapce is basically just the quantum stratified layer. The space with air has another layer and the space with the glass has another layer. And thus we have density. I'd like to hear it laid out like this with all the terms put into it and then add in the observer/cognition, etc. lol

    • @karlhungus5436
      @karlhungus5436 3 роки тому

      @@Phaze-rb3mp That would be nice if he did that.

  • @sandrabailey3966
    @sandrabailey3966 Рік тому +2

    The main question the host is debating with himself: Can Artistic Endeavors be structured by scientific systems and still be valuable coherent events?
    This question has already been answered. The Music of European Classicism, like Mozart, are DELIBERATELY based on Mathematics. Music was rejected by other practitioners if it broke with Mathmatics.
    The painting and sculpting arts of Leonardo and Michael D'Angelo's period were also dictated by Mathematics in the form of Geometry.
    Preforming arts were dictated by the combination of the pure math of the music and the expressive Geometry of movement, starting with the Opres built around the Mathematical Music of Classicism.
    These movements in the Artistic Mind evolved into the exploration of Fractal Math/Geometry when it was discovered that Light itself had as many frequencies as Sound. Artists began to explore Frequencies and Fractal Layering. Began to examine Chaos and Randomness.
    That led to the brickwall of Nonsense. Or the loss of Meaning by over absorption of perspectives. Informational Static.
    The Hyper-Realizm movement in Art of the last 3 decades of the 20th century is the beginning of return to Focus from Static.
    The better the artist/composer comprehends Mathematics, Frequencies, and the Geometry of Relationship/Movement.. the more exquisite and meaningful the product. Example: whatever the product of a Master Craftsman, the intuitive understanding of these 3 categories of science always brings forth exquisite objects. Always.

  • @gergelyozsvar9890
    @gergelyozsvar9890 Рік тому +3

    Imagine a debate between a Chris and an atheist. It would be great!

  • @roseypeach8363
    @roseypeach8363 2 роки тому +3

    So long as they keep people glued to the screen they control everything.

  • @FigmentHF
    @FigmentHF 6 місяців тому +1

    57:19 this was so strange, the video became low quality and the audio became drastically clearer, then the video cleaned up and the audio went back to roomy webcam

  • @jwink7795
    @jwink7795 11 місяців тому +3

    Chris Langan 💪🧠🤘

  • @JD-re3cj
    @JD-re3cj Місяць тому +2

    He’s good at saying things to sound clever without saying anything of substance whatsoever

  • @agentsully
    @agentsully 3 роки тому +3

    What is Langans proposed solution regarding “the rock” how does he think we need to move towards decentralization?

  • @jbu89gb
    @jbu89gb 3 роки тому +2

    1:21:00
    I was recommended this very video after watching Langan's interview with Curt on my 2020 iPhone SE. I can see the video in my search results, and on Curts channel when l check on my iPhone. You are not blocked there Chris.

    • @RealChrisLangan
      @RealChrisLangan 3 роки тому +4

      Not any more, I'm not. But the damage was done.

    • @lorcanoconnor6274
      @lorcanoconnor6274 3 роки тому

      Yeah lol he just made that up

    • @RealChrisLangan
      @RealChrisLangan 3 роки тому +1

      @@lorcanoconnor6274 Beat it, pea brain.

    • @lorcanoconnor6274
      @lorcanoconnor6274 3 роки тому

      @@RealChrisLangan haha I so hope this is the real Chris Langan

    • @jbu89gb
      @jbu89gb 3 роки тому

      @@RealChrisLangan What are the practical real world applications of your theory Chris? How can we engage in experiment or application of the theory?

  • @hightechhippie
    @hightechhippie Рік тому +3

    Chris is a cool Dude, He cstches a lot of flak because he is a real person, not groomed at the elite private schools as most academicsm he will not accept the mind virus the institution pushes and therefore he is dislike by many people that - let say it would be a lot better if they were on his team. Then there is the pont about him likly being tested as the smarted person and therefore most people in the academic communite are afraid of Chris because of his intelligence. Sup Chris , thank you for all your contribution to our society , I acknowledge the Source and worship thru my father Jesus Christ and my prays include projecting the sucess of the CTMU. Thank you for the pod also , Peace!

    • @PeterGibbonns
      @PeterGibbonns 11 місяців тому

      Yea, go ahead and believe whatever a non PHD theorists says. Thats his problem he didnt want to compete with others.

  • @Caligula138
    @Caligula138 Рік тому +2

    The amount of people that have their own Theory of Everything must has doubled or tripled in the past 10. years

  • @daviddean707
    @daviddean707 3 роки тому +4

    Like a French friend of mine, who was also smart, he married a woman with a good income, which alleviates the problem of living alone and taking society's barbs.

  • @theone-tg4ey
    @theone-tg4ey 7 місяців тому +2

    the dude seems so down to earth and likeable but also brilliant explains things so clearly and so easily . Reportedly has a 200 IQ even or higher. im a brillant man but its impressive. Love his ideas. Seems like a great guy.

  • @konberner170
    @konberner170 3 роки тому +7

    I see the key term Chris was using is "if we ALLOW". Telesis includes the sensing of what feels right, and if there is no fight against the discomfort of being controlled, then we can CHOOSE to create a system that is so broken that it could cease to exist on this planet. That doesn't mean that elsewhere it will not succeed, because I'd think it will, but on Earth, if we ALLOW being controlled then a controlled state of affairs could manifest that is antithetical to Telesis and thus have the energy deallocated from here to where it can be put to better use.
    Great discussion! Also, I don't agree with Chris as saying that there is positive intentionality and a separate issue of "moving the rock" and getting angry. There is righteous anger that is essential for positive intentionality. Positive intentionally can't exist without this as a component. In this view, there is no "problem" of positive vs. fighting for the right... they are part of the same intention.

    • @robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461
      @robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461 Рік тому

      I would suggest that there is sufficient righteous anger when one is able to envision any number of rock-based perfect eventualities, let's say, and constrain oneself preferring equanimity before having assembled a critical Mass number of individuals to "catch on" that energy and to be directed; else, it is likely to be misinterpreted as garden variety crazy when it only builds on itself within the same person, never reaching the number needed to be productive and lead to an expected outcome that is clearly more desirable, with high degree of probability of playing ou

    • @konberner170
      @konberner170 Рік тому

      ​@@robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461 As Chris wonderfully states, the universe must see itself in order to correct itself. The good news is that we don't have to do it and yet it will happen (the ongoing adjustment). The question is what you will and are willing to be part of and what you will do about it.

    • @robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461
      @robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461 Рік тому

      That isn't even a question--each of now four times I've had to restart my entire life from penniless, homeless, and last time, I didn't even get to keep a shirt on my back for the cliche, it was because I willingly walked through a completely broken system the magnitude of the injustice each time transcending our much-abused language that there remains no unambiguous means to convey a number of social contexts--another would be the situation where a son or daughter finds himself utterly unable to communicate the literal "my mom's gonna kill me! No I'm serious she's Literally gonna kill me. Just watch. I'm going to open that door, and walk ri--
      I refer to it as a social parallel of the blessing that the IUPAC has bestowed upon us with such "if it ain't broke, well actually, even if it be broke, just defer to our kids to deal with it" so we continue to promulgate a word that did used to refer to odour, but now achieves maximal obfuscation through its use in referring to a stability imparted by the delocalized pi bonds in aromatic compounds & heterocyclic amines as if words don't matter.
      Well, having personally experienced the degree to which words do matter, having been raised in an atheist aspiritual household, but through serving the traditional Latin Mass for four years every day at least once when I sought refuge from the most difficult years of the parental alienation that eventually achieved its goal after a decade and a half three times making me beg our daughters grandparents "under what stars does Katie fall asleep by each night??!" A product of a biased family court system that didn't even so much as give a "by the way--you can't just up and disappear in the middle of the night without a separation agreement in place and have your parents lie about where you are!" The result, of course, was leaving the reinforcing feedback that caused it's to happen three more times moving entire cities leaving me to find out after the fact--in any case, it's now the a fourth systemic Trainwreck I don't have the benefit of not being able to clearly foresee and try to mitigate years in advance in some cases: I guess, because now looking back, it was only by*not* allowing myself to be consumed by anger that I have been able to walk straight through a situation to let their severity become visible sometime in the future retrospection, and after twice having built myself back up to begin achieving a modicum of success in record time, I knew without an actual subject to walk through whirling knives without compromising the clarity of the message with my own [I compare it to how a dog will bite you while you're extricating the proverbial rusty nail from its paw, and that becomes the first fault for people to find when a situation is outside their set of experiences and they cannot relate it to a real situation or experience in their past, then they cannot acquire any notion of an accurate representation of what you describe, so automatically (especially if you are emotional and distraught, nevermind angry, you will see it amplifies your own victim blaming that each time will eventually cause a normal person to appear schizophrenic due to the inability of your brain to process emotionally the fact, when it hits you, that they have judged you but continue to patronize you, and you've become the "bad guy" in their minds--the more desperate that will make you feel, since if you identify as a neurodivergent person who abhors insincerity and even foreseeable yet unavoidable misrepresentation, it is the emotional roller coaster that not everyone

    • @robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461
      @robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461 Рік тому

      My point is,v if you remember the line about how "love is patient," even you will easier understand what it is that I'm triangulating you towards. And add that surely you have seen the trend in number and frequency of trajactories that can be sa

    • @konberner170
      @konberner170 Рік тому

      @@robincheungmbarealtorbroke8461 My own estimate is not only is this dimension in the process of "passing the filter", I have been predicting this even in the darkest recent days when as much as 80% were succumbing to heavy mind-control. In hypothesis is that while Chris' implication that this may be a close call is an important point, the filter has already been passed many places elsewhere, and such entities (telors if you wish) are allowed and often encouraged to help. If true, this is more of an intermediate algebra test were the goal is education than a real brush with extinction. That said, free will means that the book has not been written, and choices can always take any dimension (for lack of a better term) down a dark path. In sum, I believe we agree. If there is love, it has been cultivated by the universe in "the past" and can indeed impact the here and now. If it could, why wouldn't it?

  • @jbrink1789
    @jbrink1789 Рік тому +2

    Well what can we do against those that don't have everyones interest in mind? How can we individually get involved with helping?

  • @anthonyb8600
    @anthonyb8600 Рік тому +3

    Does anyone remember reading "The Emperor's New Clothes" as a child? I'm so pleased that the universe knows itself within a manifold being temporarily dualistic in infinte potential. Blah blah blah. I'm now off to bath the cat.

  • @That_Freedom_Guy
    @That_Freedom_Guy Рік тому +1

    No matter how precise it is, language remains a representation of reality and therefore, must always be a model of reality, but never reality itself. Models are always imperfect duplications of the real thing or they would be indistinguishable from the real thing. So, models can be mistaken for the real thing if our ability to perceive the difference is not practiced and strong. 💪🏻

  • @josecasillas4081
    @josecasillas4081 Рік тому +3

    His theory coincides with Mexican scientist Jacobo Grinberg who studied a shamanic woman known as Pachita. I know, I know, woo woo stuff, but I recommend reading about his theory, which is similar to Langan's, and it is the reason I was brought here again in my research about these topics.
    In essence, they both would seem to fundamentally agree that in the universe there is a structure/medium with which our consciousness (itself manifested as an electromagnetic field that extends in all directions) is able to interact with and manipulate the energy/information therein and therefore determine reality.
    Grinberg would go a step further and say that all brains have the capacity to connect with each other when they are at a high level of coherence (the individual experiences a sense of unity when the brain is in a highly coherent state). From the linkage between multiple brains, a collective mind is produced that is able to share thoughts and feelings between each of the individual brains.
    Grinberg disappeared in 1994 under unknown circumstances. Never seen again.

  • @oh-k-den2640
    @oh-k-den2640 11 місяців тому +1

    The problem is not that joy/satisfaction requires work, the problem is an imbalance between the amount of work required to achieve satisfaction/joy. It is too much work and too little pleasure/joy/satisfaction. But I think this is the result of a misunderstanding of work.

  • @darkyodd
    @darkyodd 3 роки тому +8

    Here before metareligion blows up