Hyperthreading or SMT is not just a software feature like you state. Although they are single cores, some things inside them are doubled like the arch state registers (these include general purpose registers, control registers, APIC and some machine state registers), each hyperthreaded core will have 2 of each. And by the way, that 4K video on youtube is almost likely being decoded on the gpu.
That SMT is purely a Software-Implementation is false. There have to be Hardware adaptations to the chip to get it working. It just takes little diespace, but it is not possible to get a core to work multithreaded only by software. Please correct. THC
Actually it is multi threading existed since 1968 on single core cpus. What they did is pause and save the instruction position of what was running then switch to another thread. That's how windows 3.1, nt.95 and 98 all worked. There is a book called how to create your own 32 bit Operating system. That will explain it and goes through the code on how it is done. There are other sources also.
@@GRHmediaBut SMT is simultaneous multi threading (ie using free arithmetic units on core to run 2 threads almost at the same time) not just task switching in time.
@@GRHmedia the video is still misleading. he's keeping SMT turned on in the bios, but SMT is hardware MT and doesn't work "purely on the software level". he's talking about software MT which he can't even turn off in the OS.
@@GRHmediaThat is time sharing based multitasking. That is NOT multithreading. It is in diametric opposition to multithreading. Matter of fact, that is what they called it, time sharing.
You are correct. I think the problem is you need to be able to save the state of the registers, and that requires hardware to do. Otherwise when you run another threads the registers get flushed and the data is lost. A lot of the bulk work is done through pushes, pops, peaks, bit shifts... and that's all register work.
It burned my ears, SMT (hyperthreading) was a thing in microprocessors since the DEC Alphas from the late 90s, that in turn was based in work made for mini computers, Intel came quite later.EDIT: SMT also needs hardware support, starting with an independent set of registers.
Hold up, the core count race did stop for quite a few years. For a long time you only had 4c/8t Intel cpu(s) as your best option. While amd was putting out really bad "8 core" cpu designs. it was like 8 years.
It was only on a desktop and only because AMD was unable to compete. On a server market core count grows fast - lga771(y2008-4cores), lga1567(y2011-8cores), lga2011+v3(y2014/2016-up to 22cores). as for AMD there was G34 with "16-cores" Opteron (like doubled FX processors)
@@АндрейШевченко-к6й The AM3+ Bulldozer cpus. Too much power draw and bad performance. That was the last of AMD bad performance as Ryzen came next and started slowly taking the lead by the 3rd gen. It's a beautiful story.
@@Iristallite i havent installed drivers for it since the kernel has it preinstalled. As of my knowledge when i tried to install by using the amdgpu-install script it bricked my install, so no drivers for me.
R23 DOES have a single core test. You just have to use the advanced menu... Also as some have mentioned SMT goes way back before Intel. Intel had to do it because Pentium 4 was a stalling bitch, SMT allowed the second thread to push instructions up the pipeline while it stalled
Yes, and no. There is some benefit to spreading the cores out rather than relying single processor pipeline. You would run into issues like heat density. With it spread out you can use multiple data paths without interrupting flow and access on a single one. A single processor is great when dealing with stuff that can be found in a single block or memory. But if you need to deal with out of non ordered multi-threading with multiple CPUs will crush it. I'm saying that after 35 years in software development and having also worked on the hardware development in a fab.
Vector processors can make sense, however in the modern computing landscape they are not worth the additional work required to optimize software and compilers for it.
@@lbgstzockt8493 SIMD isn't too different in concept and it's already present in a lot of modert CPUs. I use SIMD to great effect combined with methods most developers haven't touched since the 80s to deliver performance that's orders of magnitude ahead of competing software.
@@lbgstzockt8493 Intel started the SSE instruction extensions and AMD started their 3DNow! decades ago. God, just saying that makes me feel old. Anywho, they do vector and matrix processing.
I think you're wrong. I don't think SMT is STRICTLY software. I think you have a handful of circuits that are replicated so that switching back and forth isn't as painful. Otherwise it would be like a full context switch for the core.
Watching 4k videos on UA-cam tab is easy enough on any CPU, as long as the "Use hardware decoder" option is enabled in Chrome. The same goes for video editing.
it depends on codec i had 1060gpu which did not support AV1 codec and then it runs on cpu not gpu which some 4 and 8k youtube videos have and then you can see performance difference
@@Beeda2004 The thing is though, the Ryzen 7000 series all have iGPU's built-in, and all of them are capable of AV1 decodes. Whether it is activated in BIOS the video doesn't specify, hence my comment.
They should just make a single core cpu that has a massive instruction set and give it hyperthreading but like 1 core 8 threads. when it's running a single task it can run it at super fast speeds cause of the super sized single core and also handle multipul taks with hyperthreading.
@@obj_obj That, basically. The one place you still see a lot of single-thread CPUs is the embedded world. where power consumption or absolute reliablity is paramount. they still make 6502s...
@@storyanaksekolah2 For that, we can just use Arm cores. Windows, MacOS, and Linux are all basically there by now, releasing software for Arm machines now takes little more than flipping a switch in the compiler.
Corrections; - SMT and Hyperthreading aren't purely software-stack only. A core with Hyperthreading / SMT has additional registers to handle an additional instruction thread whenever the core is stalled due to lack of data to process. - The Pentium 4 was a single core processor with support for Intel HyperThreading. This means you still have one single core doing all the hard work, but it will display as two logical processing units in the OS because it has the ability to handle juggling two execution threads. Intel didn't produce any multi-core processors until the Core duo / Core2 Duo processor families on LGA775 and their Xeon counterparts on LGA771. - Also, CineBench R23 does have a single-core benchmark mode if you enable advanced options.
athe whole package of a 7700x with single CCD cost around $50 to manufacter, adding the packaging cost, any quad core is profitable above $100, with an msrp of $200 and discount over time, it is still doable. It's just AMD don't feel the need to it or until they have a large stock of low binned 8 core CCDs. There is already ryzen 7600 non X selling at $200. margins are always high on high end product.
I think the more separated release cycles between high end products and lower end products is the fact that more parts are binned better in general during manufacturing. Especially with AMD and their chiplet design, defective rates should be much lower
A single core CPU is the best layout for low latency, but the problem is, to get to to perform the workloads as a multicore can. With an 8-core running say 4 GHZ per core, you have 8 CPUs. For the one CPU core have the same total compute power (in theory), by comparison you need it to run at 32 GHz (which is impossible for the silicon). Of course in reality, and formost tasks, it might perform better than the 8-core (@4 GHz), if the single core is running at 20 GHz (still unattainable). The multicore layout is a necessity on a CPU, to provide the need for compute power.
I'm really surprised modern games even booted at all. I remember Farcry 4 didn't want to boot with 2 cores CPU's, and that came out in 2014. I just had the assumption that by now a lot more games would be similar in 2023.
whats funny is I just had to do something like this due to a faulty motherboard that caused the ryzen 7600 to be stuck at 550mhz, even at only 550mhz the computer was totally usable with 6 cores, even HD youtube played fine. it just felt like an older laptop.
SMT is not a software feature, it's a hardware feature where the CPU core ISA front-end state resources are duplicated (including instruction fetch and logical register file) to allow the CPU to execute two or more units of execution. The allows the CPU's decode and execution scheduling hardware to make decisions at macro and uOP level. This is fundamentally different than software (OS context switched) multithreading. To be clear, when talking about SMT, the enabled logical processors are absolutely considered hardware threads and there is actual physical additional CPU state logic (on the die) for SMT enablement.
Yep, and with the first hyperthreaded cpus, Linux kernel didn't see any difference with the cores, until they tweaked the scheduler to be tad smarted and detect which cores are "real" and not
That thing is still a rocket compared to the Athlon X2 3800+ I have in the cellar. It does about 100 in CPU-Z. But I can operate my scanner and printer with it. Unfortunately my Phenom X4 died so I got this CPU donated to replace.
thing is modern programs aren't optimized for single core CPUs, in the case we still had single cores, programs woudl be made to work with one core, but they aren't
Hugs my 16 core Ryzen I actually can't believe it took as long as it did for a consumer chip to get to 16 core. But then we had the entire industry crater in the late 1990's and it looked like the computer industry was done for, over, like the hoola hoop. Everybody had a PC that was good enough, and the Desktop Publishing revolution was over, and the Internet was sputtering out in popular appeal.
SMT here did the actual heavy lifting in games, and GPU encoding in youtube/productivity tasks. As other correctly noted SMT/HT is not a software feature. 1 core, 1 thread would have very different story.
Nice video! However when you said last real 1 core cpu was produced in 2011 I realised that I have Intel Atom E3815 terminal that has one core and its CPU was designed in late 2013 according to Intel.
Game engines are using mainly 2 threads: one for rendering (well, here is where it could split further) and game thread (for game logic). And most of the time there is no need for multi threading. But havy simulation could use other cores, for example Unity DOTS allows to utilize processing in parallel with ease, allowing to calculate much more at the same time. But DOTS will work better even on a single core. So yeah, no one writes multi threaded code as it is harder to do and probably won't pay back enough to justify it.
I would be interested to see how one very wide short pipelined single core processor would perform. Imagine the entire die was taken by the core, even bigger than Apple silicon cores.
Burn 127 cores from 128 cores CPU for one large L3 cache exclusively for one single core. It could be a little better if the die fabrication is specialized for this configuration.
Wow here you can see how much advantage has multicore. This CPU needs 35W. Its really high and got only 2300 Cinebench points. The Intel N100 is faster with 6W and 4 cores. Or a 15W Zen3 got about twice as much points and need half of power.
Quad core Pentium 4? As far as I know the Pentium 4's only went to up to dual core with the D9XX range. Intel added Hyper Threading to the single core Pentium 4 to mitigate their problem with the large instruction pipeline that they have used in that architecture. It was a method to fill up the pipeline more efficiently and gain a bit more performance out of the underwhelming Pentium 4.
Multi-threading has been around a lot longer than what you stated. It's been around since the late 1960's. Windows 2000 supported it. Windows NT 4.0 was capable of making use of multiple processors I used to run a dual core pentium 233. Hyper threading is the CPU variant were they created a parallel pipeline on the CPU that first happened in 2002 and was intel. So multi-threading existed since 1968. Hyper threading 2002.
1- diablo 4 looks like a mobile game 2- "we havent seen any single core processors for the past 10 years because of capitalist greed." LOL did i hear that properly
holy shit dude I kept wondering why his voice doesn't match up with his mouth is he that bad of an editor then I realize hes speaking an entirely difference language and that its a voice over LMFAO
why not usign dynamic inverse smt to boost single-core tasks like for exaple gaming, will be cheaper to add 4 CCDs on amd (4*8c) and use it like 4 big cores and 8 threads for gaming and use all the 32c 64t when the app requires?
This cpu is for NAS or sth not for game. Multi thread mean to run on multicore. You can run Multithread on 1 core of course but it's just slower than single single thread.
Спасибо за видео, и хотя это, конечно, небольшая претензия, но все же! Если все таки записываешь контент на английском, то переключи язык везде на английский тоже, чтобы понимать проще было
Hyperthreading or SMT is not just a software feature like you state. Although they are single cores, some things inside them are doubled like the arch state registers (these include general purpose registers, control registers, APIC and some machine state registers), each hyperthreaded core will have 2 of each. And by the way, that 4K video on youtube is almost likely being decoded on the gpu.
i understand nothing but got the message
That SMT is purely a Software-Implementation is false. There have to be Hardware adaptations to the chip to get it working. It just takes little diespace, but it is not possible to get a core to work multithreaded only by software. Please correct. THC
Actually it is multi threading existed since 1968 on single core cpus. What they did is pause and save the instruction position of what was running then switch to another thread.
That's how windows 3.1, nt.95 and 98 all worked. There is a book called how to create your own 32 bit Operating system. That will explain it and goes through the code on how it is done. There are other sources also.
@@GRHmediaBut SMT is simultaneous multi threading (ie using free arithmetic units on core to run 2 threads almost at the same time) not just task switching in time.
@@GRHmedia the video is still misleading. he's keeping SMT turned on in the bios, but SMT is hardware MT and doesn't work "purely on the software level". he's talking about software MT which he can't even turn off in the OS.
@@GRHmediaThat is time sharing based multitasking. That is NOT multithreading. It is in diametric opposition to multithreading. Matter of fact, that is what they called it, time sharing.
You are correct. I think the problem is you need to be able to save the state of the registers, and that requires hardware to do. Otherwise when you run another threads the registers get flushed and the data is lost. A lot of the bulk work is done through pushes, pops, peaks, bit shifts... and that's all register work.
Cinebench does have a single thread test, you just have to enable the advanced options
2024 has it built in on the main screen now
Correction: Multithreading is NOT a software only thing. It requires hardware support in order to properly utilize it.
Actually multithreading can be software only, simultanous multithreading requires some hardware support, either SMP or SMT etc.
@@AllanSavolainen The video is referring to SMT
@@sbeve7445 sure, which is hardware feature as OP corrected
Yes. it seems it was made with gpt
It burned my ears, SMT (hyperthreading) was a thing in microprocessors since the DEC Alphas from the late 90s, that in turn was based in work made for mini computers, Intel came quite later.EDIT: SMT also needs hardware support, starting with an independent set of registers.
Alphas had SMT? Didn't know that, though they were just the first SMP computers that consumers could afford.
Finally a CPU for Arma 3
And its always the games with massive maps and distant landscapes who need the multithread the most, that are poorly optimized for just that.
@@xentiment6581 Ye squad runs awful on my 12600k.
Arma 3 is a breeze on my 7800x3D
@@portman8909 optimization is really not a relevant concept on TOTL hardware thats like a decade newer than a game
The brute force method always helps get past poor optimisation :D@@xentiment6581
Hold up, the core count race did stop for quite a few years. For a long time you only had 4c/8t Intel cpu(s) as your best option. While amd was putting out really bad "8 core" cpu designs. it was like 8 years.
It was only on a desktop and only because AMD was unable to compete. On a server market core count grows fast - lga771(y2008-4cores), lga1567(y2011-8cores), lga2011+v3(y2014/2016-up to 22cores). as for AMD there was G34 with "16-cores" Opteron (like doubled FX processors)
@@АндрейШевченко-к6й The AM3+ Bulldozer cpus. Too much power draw and bad performance. That was the last of AMD bad performance as Ryzen came next and started slowly taking the lead by the 3rd gen. It's a beautiful story.
Don't worry, we're now revisiting the gigahertz wars.
@@ArtisChroniclesYep, 4 GHZ used to seem monster fast, now it seems basic.
Who needs E-Cores LMFAO
The AMD A4 and A6 APUs up to 2019 are arguably single core processors, though AMD marketed them as dual cores.
Maybe like 1.1 core :-) - I have A6 9500 whose multithreaded score is about 10% higher single than threaded score.
i have a A6-9225, THERE ARE NO FU*KING DRIVERS FOR IT IN UBUNTU 😭
@@SniperAWPtip: 9225 is equivalent to 9220 i belive
this helped when downloading the radeon drivers
@@SniperAWP Welcome to Linux. Nothings supported.
@@Iristallite i havent installed drivers for it since the kernel has it preinstalled. As of my knowledge when i tried to install by using the amdgpu-install script it bricked my install, so no drivers for me.
R23 DOES have a single core test. You just have to use the advanced menu... Also as some have mentioned SMT goes way back before Intel.
Intel had to do it because Pentium 4 was a stalling bitch, SMT allowed the second thread to push instructions up the pipeline while it stalled
Wow when a 1 core CPU isn't stabbed to death by removing cache and having low clocks it actually works (athlone ,Pentium , Celeron )
actually a very wide big 1 core can technically perform just as well , especially if its built for it. we just never went that route
Yes, and no. There is some benefit to spreading the cores out rather than relying single processor pipeline. You would run into issues like heat density. With it spread out you can use multiple data paths without interrupting flow and access on a single one. A single processor is great when dealing with stuff that can be found in a single block or memory. But if you need to deal with out of non ordered multi-threading with multiple CPUs will crush it. I'm saying that after 35 years in software development and having also worked on the hardware development in a fab.
The speed of light is the limiting factor for how much die space can be invested into a single core.
So no.
Vector processors can make sense, however in the modern computing landscape they are not worth the additional work required to optimize software and compilers for it.
@@lbgstzockt8493 SIMD isn't too different in concept and it's already present in a lot of modert CPUs.
I use SIMD to great effect combined with methods most developers haven't touched since the 80s to deliver performance that's orders of magnitude ahead of competing software.
@@lbgstzockt8493 Intel started the SSE instruction extensions and AMD started their 3DNow! decades ago. God, just saying that makes me feel old. Anywho, they do vector and matrix processing.
I think you're wrong. I don't think SMT is STRICTLY software. I think you have a handful of circuits that are replicated so that switching back and forth isn't as painful. Otherwise it would be like a full context switch for the core.
Watching 4k videos on UA-cam tab is easy enough on any CPU, as long as the "Use hardware decoder" option is enabled in Chrome.
The same goes for video editing.
it depends on codec i had 1060gpu which did not support AV1 codec and then it runs on cpu not gpu which some 4 and 8k youtube videos have and then you can see performance difference
@@Beeda2004 The thing is though, the Ryzen 7000 series all have iGPU's built-in, and all of them are capable of AV1 decodes. Whether it is activated in BIOS the video doesn't specify, hence my comment.
They should just make a single core cpu that has a massive instruction set and give it hyperthreading but like 1 core 8 threads. when it's running a single task it can run it at super fast speeds cause of the super sized single core and also handle multipul taks with hyperthreading.
Or software developers could just write their software with multithreading in mind
@@obj_obj That, basically.
The one place you still see a lot of single-thread CPUs is the embedded world. where power consumption or absolute reliablity is paramount. they still make 6502s...
so, can we get 3 level hybrid cpu cores like arm?
@@storyanaksekolah2 For that, we can just use Arm cores. Windows, MacOS, and Linux are all basically there by now, releasing software for Arm machines now takes little more than flipping a switch in the compiler.
A lot of arguing semantics here, but to make a point along with the video: the Pentium 4 HT was a single core CPU with hyper threading
Corrections;
- SMT and Hyperthreading aren't purely software-stack only. A core with Hyperthreading / SMT has additional registers to handle an additional instruction thread whenever the core is stalled due to lack of data to process.
- The Pentium 4 was a single core processor with support for Intel HyperThreading. This means you still have one single core doing all the hard work, but it will display as two logical processing units in the OS because it has the ability to handle juggling two execution threads. Intel didn't produce any multi-core processors until the Core duo / Core2 Duo processor families on LGA775 and their Xeon counterparts on LGA771.
- Also, CineBench R23 does have a single-core benchmark mode if you enable advanced options.
athe whole package of a 7700x with single CCD cost around $50 to manufacter, adding the packaging cost, any quad core is profitable above $100, with an msrp of $200 and discount over time, it is still doable. It's just AMD don't feel the need to it or until they have a large stock of low binned 8 core CCDs. There is already ryzen 7600 non X selling at $200. margins are always high on high end product.
I think the more separated release cycles between high end products and lower end products is the fact that more parts are binned better in general during manufacturing. Especially with AMD and their chiplet design, defective rates should be much lower
A single core CPU is the best layout for low latency, but the problem is, to get to to perform the workloads as a multicore can. With an 8-core running say 4 GHZ per core, you have 8 CPUs. For the one CPU core have the same total compute power (in theory), by comparison you need it to run at 32 GHz (which is impossible for the silicon). Of course in reality, and formost tasks, it might perform better than the 8-core (@4 GHz), if the single core is running at 20 GHz (still unattainable). The multicore layout is a necessity on a CPU, to provide the need for compute power.
Nice
I'm really surprised modern games even booted at all. I remember Farcry 4 didn't want to boot with 2 cores CPU's, and that came out in 2014. I just had the assumption that by now a lot more games would be similar in 2023.
that was a case of bad development practices
@@najeebshah. Yeah. Actually that makes sense.
That was 4 threads as I remember. Meaning i3 and not pentium, not that big an issue as people thought.
whats funny is I just had to do something like this due to a faulty motherboard that caused the ryzen 7600 to be stuck at 550mhz, even at only 550mhz the computer was totally usable with 6 cores, even HD youtube played fine. it just felt like an older laptop.
SMT is not a software feature, it's a hardware feature where the CPU core ISA front-end state resources are duplicated (including instruction fetch and logical register file) to allow the CPU to execute two or more units of execution. The allows the CPU's decode and execution scheduling hardware to make decisions at macro and uOP level. This is fundamentally different than software (OS context switched) multithreading. To be clear, when talking about SMT, the enabled logical processors are absolutely considered hardware threads and there is actual physical additional CPU state logic (on the die) for SMT enablement.
Yep, and with the first hyperthreaded cpus, Linux kernel didn't see any difference with the cores, until they tweaked the scheduler to be tad smarted and detect which cores are "real" and not
That thing is still a rocket compared to the Athlon X2 3800+ I have in the cellar. It does about 100 in CPU-Z. But I can operate my scanner and printer with it. Unfortunately my Phenom X4 died so I got this CPU donated to replace.
thing is modern programs aren't optimized for single core CPUs, in the case we still had single cores, programs woudl be made to work with one core, but they aren't
Hugs my 16 core Ryzen
I actually can't believe it took as long as it did for a consumer chip to get to 16 core.
But then we had the entire industry crater in the late 1990's and it looked like the computer industry was done for, over, like the hoola hoop. Everybody had a PC that was good enough, and the Desktop Publishing revolution was over, and the Internet was sputtering out in popular appeal.
Very great video and looks realistic!
i used pentium 4 for 7 years with windows 10 and 7
Definitely the first time I ever hear a plague tale's music in a youtube video
How about 7800X3D single core?
finally a cpu for my windows 95 build.
In 4:08: I guess the result of that A10-7850k was me. :D
2:50 "Quad-core Pentium [4] for LGA478"
Surely this is a typo from the script, right? P4 was single-core and on PGA packages
SMT here did the actual heavy lifting in games, and GPU encoding in youtube/productivity tasks. As other correctly noted SMT/HT is not a software feature. 1 core, 1 thread would have very different story.
wouldnt surprise me if that single core is faster than the i7 2600 in my media pc
wtf is that pfp
Volodymyr Zelenskyy showin putin whats up@@gabrielv.4358
Nice video!
However when you said last real 1 core cpu was produced in 2011 I realised that I have Intel Atom E3815 terminal that has one core and its CPU was designed in late 2013 according to Intel.
Game engines are using mainly 2 threads: one for rendering (well, here is where it could split further) and game thread (for game logic). And most of the time there is no need for multi threading. But havy simulation could use other cores, for example Unity DOTS allows to utilize processing in parallel with ease, allowing to calculate much more at the same time. But DOTS will work better even on a single core. So yeah, no one writes multi threaded code as it is harder to do and probably won't pay back enough to justify it.
Not BeamNG. It uses all cores
would be nice yo try crazy overlock to see how much preforamcne you could push out, with those temps you could probably get like 5,8-9Ghz
I'd like to see those Overclockers using Liquid Nitrogen to try 1core/2thread at around 10GHz (like they originally though 1 core was going to do.)
Makes me really wish we had better heterogenous x86 designs/support.
DANGGGGGGGG ok. This was impressive! Amd should've definitelyyyyyy do a quad core. A 100 dollar 4 core zen 4 cpu would do work.
Real gamers only need 1 core bro.
I would be interested to see how one very wide short pipelined single core processor would perform. Imagine the entire die was taken by the core, even bigger than Apple silicon cores.
And the software optimization would be very different with today's paradigm.
Burn 127 cores from 128 cores CPU for one large L3 cache exclusively for one single core. It could be a little better if the die fabrication is specialized for this configuration.
You can see that modern cpus are insanely fast. we dont need more than that........
Wow here you can see how much advantage has multicore. This CPU needs 35W. Its really high and got only 2300 Cinebench points. The Intel N100 is faster with 6W and 4 cores. Or a 15W Zen3 got about twice as much points and need half of power.
perfect for windows xp gaming machine
Awesome test
Quad core Pentium 4? As far as I know the Pentium 4's only went to up to dual core with the D9XX range. Intel added Hyper Threading to the single core Pentium 4 to mitigate their problem with the large instruction pipeline that they have used in that architecture. It was a method to fill up the pipeline more efficiently and gain a bit more performance out of the underwhelming Pentium 4.
This would be great for Catia V5-6 :)
What's the point of comparing the newest single core to any other processor and limiting it to just one core...
He said "because of capitalist greed" at the end very Sovietly....
should have used a 14900ks
The way humans do the things make a single core cpu not a great option
Multi-threading has been around a lot longer than what you stated. It's been around since the late 1960's. Windows 2000 supported it. Windows NT 4.0 was capable of making use of multiple processors I used to run a dual core pentium 233. Hyper threading is the CPU variant were they created a parallel pipeline on the CPU that first happened in 2002 and was intel.
So multi-threading existed since 1968. Hyper threading 2002.
So what you're saying is that the industry is using Google Go language for multi threading that's just fake.
Athlon XP is this u?
1- diablo 4 looks like a mobile game
2- "we havent seen any single core processors for the past 10 years because of capitalist greed." LOL did i hear that properly
I’m gonna get one for the sake of just having it 😂.
holy shit dude I kept wondering why his voice doesn't match up with his mouth is he that bad of an editor then I realize hes speaking an entirely difference language and that its a voice over LMFAO
4:03 ? The score should have been much higher.
why not usign dynamic inverse smt to boost single-core tasks like for exaple gaming, will be cheaper to add 4 CCDs on amd (4*8c) and use it like 4 big cores and 8 threads for gaming and use all the 32c 64t when the app requires?
Is this video audio dubbed? Or why is the audio not aligned with his mouth?
It'a dub from russian
This cpu is for NAS or sth not for game. Multi thread mean to run on multicore. You can run Multithread on 1 core of course but it's just slower than single single thread.
This is better than my 4th gen i5...
I mean he is running a rtx 3080 ti
о я не знал что у тебя английский альт есть. хороший диктор
I waant to see u run NFS Heat
But can it run Crysis?
Can you try to do a 3cores and as high as possible Overlock?
Do 2 cores with modern amount of cache since 200ge has almost nome
What CPU is "I3 12100K" they were comparing to the new AMD offering in the presentation?
there aint no K!
Спасибо за видео, и хотя это, конечно, небольшая претензия, но все же! Если все таки записываешь контент на английском, то переключи язык везде на английский тоже, чтобы понимать проще было
wonder if one core Ryzen would be better with extra cache like on 7800x3d lol
if it existed in our world, wouldnt it be an athlon class cpu?
Atom*?
fix the audio video sync
I think it’s a voiceover
Is it just me or i feel like his lip doesn't sync with his naration
My r23 test uas single and multi core tests
ehm the sound doesnt fit
I mean the sound is delayed
overclock it ! (ram too)
7100 would have 4 cores, not 1, just like the Ryzen 3 3100 or 4100
😅
It’s a Ryzen 1, not a Ryzen 3. 😂.
You have abysmal audio latency. Do the clap alignment, please.
It'a dub from russian
The info in this video is so bad it's beyond laughable...
Bro you Audio out of sync
He’s not speaking English 🤦🏼♂️. This is a dub in English.
but can it run Far Cry?
Do a 1 core 2 threads!!!!!!
Awesome video
most loud ass intro then this guy speaks quiet af
Who needs E-Cores LMFAO
AMD FTW
Yes
Ryzen 1?
6:33 isnt this kinda inaccurate because the igpu is mostly being used? lol
Yea kinda but the igpu is still a part of the cpu
i have 3/6 fx 6100 cpu that is weaker than 1 core 2 threads at this cpu
#AkusuallyMeme
Like for the polish joke.
Fun fact: You represent the same "capitalist greed" by creating videos with translation into another language to get more money and views.
Click bait
cpu these days are too powerful,together with ai optimization,devs are lazier to optimize their app,me too
Actually celeron with hyperphreading is dual core
Why is this video dubbed💀
Because it's not enligh in original, duh
You should have overclocked it to the maximum possible
intel still does it way better.......
Multi threading is purely hardware not software ...
I was hoping for Minecraft with some shader packs 🤏
Boycott Nvidia
If the 4090 was 200$ I'd still go for a 7900 xtz
cap