Luke's advice about making students creditors, has that even been tested against case law and in court? EDIT: Those present in this video along with many at UARTS don't want to face reality. They never bother to ask the question as to why the university had to take out over $100M in debt. Could the reason be that the policies UARTS instituted starting in 2009 where they began to blatantly discriminate against straight white males both in terms of student body and employment? Do you think the fact that UARTS career services office was impotent in its ability to send students to job opportunities. For instance, the CS office had zero contact information for any of musician unions, acting unions, and made no attempt to reach out to theaters to establish a pipeline for UARTS alumni to, in the least, audition for roles. Do you think their penchant for hiring UARTS alumni, thus not bringing new blood into the university? Are you even remotely aware that the music department's faculty consisted of 40% UARTS alumni at the time of closure? Or how about the exorbitant number of lawsuits filed against UARTS over the decades? Or are you even aware that the female teachers in visual art department conspired where they setup a honeypot to malign and terminate a teacher simply because he was a straight white male? (BTW, he won the court case and was paid handsomely.) Additionally, the women who engaged in this conspiracy, they were so dumb they outlined their plans in email and left it on the server for quite some time. Everyone wants to focus on the money. They want to insinuate that there was some secret cabal that set out to harm so called hard working artists. But they don't want to face the reality that it was their cherished policies of DEI, AA, hiring bigoted women, not have both visual and performing art standards all led to the collapse, or the fact that many of the student body had SAT scores in math and reading in the 200-300 levels.
Amazing upload, thank you so much
Luke's advice about making students creditors, has that even been tested against case law and in court?
EDIT: Those present in this video along with many at UARTS don't want to face reality. They never bother to ask the question as to why the university had to take out over $100M in debt. Could the reason be that the policies UARTS instituted starting in 2009 where they began to blatantly discriminate against straight white males both in terms of student body and employment? Do you think the fact that UARTS career services office was impotent in its ability to send students to job opportunities. For instance, the CS office had zero contact information for any of musician unions, acting unions, and made no attempt to reach out to theaters to establish a pipeline for UARTS alumni to, in the least, audition for roles. Do you think their penchant for hiring UARTS alumni, thus not bringing new blood into the university? Are you even remotely aware that the music department's faculty consisted of 40% UARTS alumni at the time of closure? Or how about the exorbitant number of lawsuits filed against UARTS over the decades? Or are you even aware that the female teachers in visual art department conspired where they setup a honeypot to malign and terminate a teacher simply because he was a straight white male? (BTW, he won the court case and was paid handsomely.) Additionally, the women who engaged in this conspiracy, they were so dumb they outlined their plans in email and left it on the server for quite some time.
Everyone wants to focus on the money. They want to insinuate that there was some secret cabal that set out to harm so called hard working artists. But they don't want to face the reality that it was their cherished policies of DEI, AA, hiring bigoted women, not have both visual and performing art standards all led to the collapse, or the fact that many of the student body had SAT scores in math and reading in the 200-300 levels.