GfG Weekly Coding Contest - 191 Post Analysis | GeeksforGeeks Practice

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
  • #GeeksforGeeks #GfGPractice #WeeklyCodingContest
    Join us for a post-contest analysis with Ayush Tripathi where we will discuss the problems from the GFG Weekly Coding Contest - 191. In this session, Ayush will share his approach to solving problems and provide valuable insights on approaching similar problems in the future.
    Whether you participated in the contest or not, this session is a great opportunity to learn new problem-solving techniques and deepen your understanding of data structures and algorithms. You'll have the chance to ask questions and interact with other participants, making this a fun and engaging learning experience.
    🏆 Register for the Upcoming GFG Weekly Coding Contest: www.geeksforge...
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    📆 Solve PROBLEM OF THE DAY Daily: www.geeksforge...
    📖 Master Competitive Programming: www.geeksforge...
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Follow us and stay updated on everything happening in the world of geeks:
    📱 Twitter- / x.com/geeksfor...
    📝 LinkedIn- / / geeksforgeeks
    🌐 Facebook- / / geeksforgeeks.org
    📷 Instagram- www.instagram....
    #GFGPractice #GeeksforGeeks #WeeklyCodingContest #CodingQuestions
    #WeeklyCodingContest191 #ayushtripathi

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @jatin28219o
    @jatin28219o 12 днів тому +3

    great ayush ❤❤

  • @AmitYadav-fo3qi
    @AmitYadav-fo3qi 12 днів тому +3

    your same code for the 2nd problem is not working, as everyone was asking about the wrong answer on some test case, and you kept ignoring them and moved on to the 3rd problem. you should have debug the code at the same time but you thought, what if you end up with the same WA. this is not the way that pcd works.

    • @AyushAnandTripathi
      @AyushAnandTripathi 12 днів тому +1

      The solution I have provided for the 2nd problem is absolutely correct and passes all the test cases.
      Find below :
      class Solution {
      public:
      int longestPalindrome(vector& arr) {
      int left = 0, right = arr.size() - 1;
      long leftSum = arr[left], rightSum = arr[right];
      int res = 0;
      while (left < right) {
      if (leftSum == rightSum) {
      res += 2;
      left++;
      right--;
      leftSum = arr[left];
      rightSum = arr[right];
      }
      else if (leftSum < rightSum) {
      left++;
      leftSum += arr[left];
      }
      else {
      right--;
      rightSum += arr[right];
      }
      }
      if (left == right)
      res++;
      return res;
      }
      };

    • @AyushAnandTripathi
      @AyushAnandTripathi 12 днів тому +3

      Additionally, it is not feasible to dry run the solution for more than 2 test cases (which I already did); otherwise, the session becomes too long.
      However, since the recording will always be available, you can dry run additional examples yourself.

  • @anuragpatel9922
    @anuragpatel9922 11 днів тому

    in third question
    why we cannot apply dp means
    make a string of length n with all A's intially then for each index recurr it 4 times and if u sucessfully made a string then add 1.
    This was my thought process tell what is wrong in this.

  • @ankitgupta358
    @ankitgupta358 6 днів тому

    if for each index we would have 2 choices so it would be something 2^size not only 4
    i am saying in last when you multiplied by 4 there it shouldn't be 2^size?

  • @viholvishwassinh1709
    @viholvishwassinh1709 12 днів тому

    use long long for second question

  • @viholvishwassinh1709
    @viholvishwassinh1709 12 днів тому

    in 2nd question class Solution {
    public:
    int longestPalindrome(vector& arr) {
    // code here
    int ans = 0;
    int i = 0,j = arr.size()-1;
    int lsum = arr[i],rsum = arr[j];
    while(i < j){
    if(lsum == rsum){
    ans += 2;
    i++;
    j--;
    lsum = arr[i];
    rsum = arr[j];
    }
    else if(lsum < rsum){
    i++;
    lsum += arr[i];
    }
    else{
    j--;
    rsum += arr[j];
    }
    }
    if(i == j) ans++;
    return ans;

    }
    };
    why this code is giving wrong ans?