"Yeah there's a hole in my soul But one thing I've learned For every love letter written There's another one burned So you tell me how it's gonna be this time" Aerosmith.
Re intelligence, look up ravens (or less specifically, corvidae in general) and dolphins (or, again, less specifically, cetaceans in general). Both are well-known in the scientific community for intelligence approaching that of at least a young human child. There is openly some question as to whether certain corvidae species might be sentient/sapient on at least a low level. Also maybe don't be high/drunk/etc so much, on the toilet or otherwise... but that's just general good advice ;) Re aliens, I have two approximately-intersecting theories. One is what I call The Bill Watterson Theory of Extraterrestrial Contact, as it was most famously espoused by the fellow of that name, best known for the newspaper comic strip he did in the 1980s and 1990s about a perpetually-awfully-behaved forever-six-year-old named Calvin and the stuffed tiger often "brought to life" by Calvin's imagination, and the various adventures they supposedly went on... much to the chagrin of Calvin's parents! The theory is pretty simple, if rather cynical, and originally voiced, as far as I can tell, through Calvin in a two-pane strip on a Wednesday -- "Sometimes I think the surest sign of intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." Note that this source differs from the commonly-shown panel of Calvin and Hobbes standing next to a stump. I'm pretty sure that one was a later Photoshop job. The original also has an environmentalist tinge to it, as Calvin begins his remarks by talking about how the destruction of various forests across the globe is leading to a number of artificially-induced extinctions of animal species that dwell there. The original source circulated in newspapers on 8 November 1989... I would have been a fraction over three years old. The other theory is that it's a matter of statistics... which is to say, it is simply too likely for life to form in the universe, by way of probability, for us to be alone in the universe as an intelligent and at least vaguely spacefaring (so far) species. There are approximately two hundred sextillion known stars at the moment. Not billion, not trillion... _sextillion_ -- that's seven groups of three zeros after the 200. Not all of those stars are still active, however -- because the speed of light is not infinite, and the distances involved are unimaginably vast, by the time we can detect even the nearest star to Earth, we're seeing light that came from that star a bit over four years ago. The farther away the star is, the farther back in time, effectively, we go... but that's not the point, since stars are something of a renewable resource, so to speak -- as stars die (which takes a really long time anyways) new stars form. So that number is probably about accurate to the number of stars that _currently_ exist across that distance as well. By the way, that distance is roughly 28 billion lightyears -- the farthest star known, which we humans call 'Earendel' on our star charts, is so far away that the light we are now seeing from it, first came from that star so long ago that the Milky Way Galaxy, in which our solar system exists, was not yet formed until that light got a bit more than halfway here. Earth itself is 'only' about four-and-a-half billion years old. Within about 32 lightyears of Earth, there's about 415 stars. Wikipedia has it at "more than 413" for a radius of 32.6 LY. Of those, exactly 64 stars are known to have planets around them... a total of 114 planets, in fact. Of those one hundred fourteen, precisely twenty-one are considered potentially habitable. Finding the number of star _systems_ in that range is infuriatingly hard. Wikipedia provides lists of star systems, but nothing closer than 16 LY, and the rows are unnumbered. A manual count of all systems up to 32 LY exactly is 237 systems, and there is an "infotainment" article that lists "the fifty closest star systems", all of which are less than 16 LY. Unfortunately, this is not commonly-cataloged astronomical data, and such catalogs' search and query functions are utterly inscrutable to the general public (or even a computer nerd like me). Pardon the pun, but you may as well sit me in front of a Klingon interface! (Klingon is indeed a full-on language, one of the _Star Trek_ writers, I think it was, did it up properly back in the 1970s or 1980s, but as nerdy as I am I've never bothered to learn it.) But across those various Wiki articles as well as the "infotainment" article found on Google, we have 287 known systems and a likely incomplete list. A conjectured three to five systems within the small fraction of a lightyear not covered by either Wikipedia or the Google-found article seems quite reasonable. We''ll go with the larger estimate for the benefit of the doubt. Thus, for the purposes of everyone's sanity and keeping the math simple, and since I'm not an actual NASA astronomer -- I'm not a NASA anything, and as close as I get to astronomy is being something of a 'space cadet' in daily life (as I'm sure you can tell by now) -- let's keep those numbers at exactly 413 stars, within 292 systems, across 32 lightyears, and we'll assume that each of the 64 stars with planets belongs to a different star system. As such, we have 64 systems with planets... 114 planets, per Wikipedia, as mentioned before, of which 21 are considered potentially habitable. But how probable is the development of an extraterrestrial spacefaring race? Kind of hard to say, but we're doing back-of-the-envelope astrometrics here. A 2020 study by a Professor David Kipping at Columbia, based on the so-called Drake Equation (look it up) puts the likelihood of life evolving to the point where it is "complex, differentiated, and intelligent" -- meaning, at least in the most abstract sense possible, a bit like humanity, at about 3:2 odds. That works out to a 60% likelihood that you get a race at least capable of dropping Bill, Bob, and Val on the Mun in something seemingly high-tech but also rather cobbled-together and then just doing space stations in orbit for the next roughly 100 years :P So. A little math. 292 star systems, 64 with planets. 114 planets, 21 potentially habitable. 60% chance of life on the habitable planets. Those are our starting numbers. Using a bit of math that you should have learned in grade school, we get the following: 21.9% chance of a given star system having at least one planet -- 18.4% chance of a given planet being habitable -- 11.1% chance of a given habitable planet having an actual spacefaring race on it (let's be at least a _little_ optimistic!). From that, we get that, presuming 200 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 stars in the current known universe, 894 571 200 000 000 000 000 of them likely have spacefaring races. Let's get a little closer to home, though... slightly literally. The Milky Way Galaxy has approximately 100 billion stars in it. Given that our earlier numbers indicated 413 stars across 292 systems, we can extrapolate that there are roughly 70 700 000 000 (70.7 billion) star systems in our galaxy. That gives us a bit over 316.2 million planets with spacefaring races (if you want to be obnoxious in math class, it's 316, 230, 919 planets, on the dot). Mind you, the margin of error in here from compound estimation, potential manual error, and less-than-unquestionable sources would likely be of career-ending magnitude if someone actually were fool enough to try and present this as a proper academic study set with reasonably valid data, but I'm just one idiot out of something like 7 billion of em on a lonely little blue dot, and I waste space for a living. Besides, this is a UA-cam comment, and it's not even Technology Connections guy's channel. If you want to be pedantic, go talk to him! ( :P )
I had some trouble figuring out whether this was a Snuffy out of context video or just normal Snuffy Turns out Snuffy's context is constantly out of context
05:11 Well, .. well.. where have you brought me today, magic school bus, called youtube algorithm...?! I have to say that was, an interesting thought process... Thanks for being you.
@@PeachDragon_ I wouldn’t say “we” killed them. We just survived better. Literally natural selection and survival of the fittest but it’s actually survival of the most intelligent lol
Perhaps we should take Snuffys advice and begin to uplift our fellow primates into society, because some people in this world truly haven't reached the required level of intelligence to justify them living
for a time there were creatures that were our close relatives that were around our intelegence maybe a bit more maybe a bit less, but our ancestors likely killed them all. Many of us have hybrid dna.
Funny story about snuffies theory: we haven't encountered any superior lifeforms yet because our species has hit an evolutionary wall. Sadly if we continue the way we are now we won't overcome that wall.
When I take a dump I wonder why it takes me like 30 seconds to shoot it out and other people need a book to read or something like they’re in a doctors office 🤔
4:26 does she know about the existance of other galaxys? i mean we never been everywhere so it can exist but we didn't find anything yet (if nasa is peaking the true i mean)
There were other species of humans that probably rivalled our intelligence but they're all dead now. Or we interbred with them so we became one. Also, crows probably have some form of language as they can accurately describe humans that were being dicks to them to other crows and pass their hatred on to their kids. If they don't die out and give them a bit of time they may compete with us. Also given the millions of years of life on this planet and the fact that most species have gone extinct some may have had human level intelligence but went extinct before they did anything with it. Humans spent most of our time as a species as hunter gatherers and if we went extinct before we created civilization there wouldn't be much evidence of our intelligence down the line. Plenty of other species come decently close to our intelligence too. Like give them one more point to their INT and they'd be at our level. So it's not that uncommon of a thing to evolve. I think we were just the first to push the limits of our intelligence for whatever reason because our hunter gatherer stage was our longest, most successful period so we probably had a reason to have to change. Didn't just do it because it was fun because it was miserable for a long time as we were figuring out farming. Like I heard one theory that humans were too successful at being hunter gatherers and couldn't support their populations so they decided to try to grow food and things just went downhill from there. Those were my thoughts I had about your shidding thoughts that I also had while shidding.
you are going to loose your mind when you discover mushrooms have network intelligence and are sentient good luck with that one . I'm still having a conflict with that and the fact they are tasty fried .
@ 4:57 We had two species thousands of years ago that were at about the same level of intelligence as us (Homo Erectus and Neanderthals) and we killed them.. Go Homo Sapiens 💫
![[Stream] Snuffy having a chill night | Donut County](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dcdPyhau7U0/mqdefault.jpg)
all the best theories start out with the phrase "so i was shidding on the toilet the other day..."
Snuffy, on the verge of unveilling Fermi's paradox
All the while I'm actually on the shidder.
Donut Country Racoon: *Makes chaos using holes.*
Snuffy: Could this guy be one of my people?
The people: We don't want to go in the hole
Snuffy: WELL THAT'S TOO DAMN BAD
did you just make a holes reference in 2021?
Day 1 of simping for snuffy
THE EPISODE CAME OUT 10 SECONDS AGO
Welcome brother
weak
welcome
@@poompus9915 simp% speedrun wr.
Snuffy: Are rabbits fucking in my hole!?
R34 Artists: *TAKING NOTES*
6:24 Holy crap that voice 💘
And now Snuffy is putting everything into her ever expanding hole. You know some artist is gonna do this :P
Bruh 🤣
...
Sounds like something xxx52 would make or something.
Snuffy: Has really deep philosophical thoughts about the universe on the toilet
Also Snuffy: Bunny fucking!!!
I'm surprised Snuffy didn't play this game a lot sooner, it was practically made for her. lol
Alternate title: Snuffy discovers the Fermi Paradox while takin a monster shid
I would have been happy if she tried impersonating Mark when BK mentions Lisa destroying his Quadcopter.
"You're tearing me apart, Lisa!"
I love when we get little snips of Snuffy's real (or as I call it her ara ara) voice. Like at 2:53 when she says "have a garbage day."
The editing on Snuffy's Ancient Aliens rant was *chef's kiss*
Underground people: Can you get us cool stuff from the surface?
Snuffy: *brings them fire and overpopulation*
I swear, this game could've been one heck of a creepypasta with the correct changes applied.
Haven't crows entered their Stone Age? They are creating tools and passing on the knowledge to new generations.
Also chimpanzees have entered there stone age
"Yeah there's a hole in my soul
But one thing I've learned
For every love letter written
There's another one burned
So you tell me how it's gonna be this time" Aerosmith.
the song at the end is so chill. this game is awesome
Snuffy, being more lewd then Vei is NOT competition, I’d stop before it’s too late
Re intelligence, look up ravens (or less specifically, corvidae in general) and dolphins (or, again, less specifically, cetaceans in general). Both are well-known in the scientific community for intelligence approaching that of at least a young human child. There is openly some question as to whether certain corvidae species might be sentient/sapient on at least a low level.
Also maybe don't be high/drunk/etc so much, on the toilet or otherwise... but that's just general good advice ;)
Re aliens, I have two approximately-intersecting theories. One is what I call The Bill Watterson Theory of Extraterrestrial Contact, as it was most famously espoused by the fellow of that name, best known for the newspaper comic strip he did in the 1980s and 1990s about a perpetually-awfully-behaved forever-six-year-old named Calvin and the stuffed tiger often "brought to life" by Calvin's imagination, and the various adventures they supposedly went on... much to the chagrin of Calvin's parents! The theory is pretty simple, if rather cynical, and originally voiced, as far as I can tell, through Calvin in a two-pane strip on a Wednesday -- "Sometimes I think the surest sign of intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." Note that this source differs from the commonly-shown panel of Calvin and Hobbes standing next to a stump. I'm pretty sure that one was a later Photoshop job. The original also has an environmentalist tinge to it, as Calvin begins his remarks by talking about how the destruction of various forests across the globe is leading to a number of artificially-induced extinctions of animal species that dwell there. The original source circulated in newspapers on 8 November 1989... I would have been a fraction over three years old.
The other theory is that it's a matter of statistics... which is to say, it is simply too likely for life to form in the universe, by way of probability, for us to be alone in the universe as an intelligent and at least vaguely spacefaring (so far) species.
There are approximately two hundred sextillion known stars at the moment. Not billion, not trillion... _sextillion_ -- that's seven groups of three zeros after the 200. Not all of those stars are still active, however -- because the speed of light is not infinite, and the distances involved are unimaginably vast, by the time we can detect even the nearest star to Earth, we're seeing light that came from that star a bit over four years ago. The farther away the star is, the farther back in time, effectively, we go... but that's not the point, since stars are something of a renewable resource, so to speak -- as stars die (which takes a really long time anyways) new stars form. So that number is probably about accurate to the number of stars that _currently_ exist across that distance as well. By the way, that distance is roughly 28 billion lightyears -- the farthest star known, which we humans call 'Earendel' on our star charts, is so far away that the light we are now seeing from it, first came from that star so long ago that the Milky Way Galaxy, in which our solar system exists, was not yet formed until that light got a bit more than halfway here. Earth itself is 'only' about four-and-a-half billion years old.
Within about 32 lightyears of Earth, there's about 415 stars. Wikipedia has it at "more than 413" for a radius of 32.6 LY. Of those, exactly 64 stars are known to have planets around them... a total of 114 planets, in fact. Of those one hundred fourteen, precisely twenty-one are considered potentially habitable. Finding the number of star _systems_ in that range is infuriatingly hard. Wikipedia provides lists of star systems, but nothing closer than 16 LY, and the rows are unnumbered. A manual count of all systems up to 32 LY exactly is 237 systems, and there is an "infotainment" article that lists "the fifty closest star systems", all of which are less than 16 LY. Unfortunately, this is not commonly-cataloged astronomical data, and such catalogs' search and query functions are utterly inscrutable to the general public (or even a computer nerd like me). Pardon the pun, but you may as well sit me in front of a Klingon interface! (Klingon is indeed a full-on language, one of the _Star Trek_ writers, I think it was, did it up properly back in the 1970s or 1980s, but as nerdy as I am I've never bothered to learn it.) But across those various Wiki articles as well as the "infotainment" article found on Google, we have 287 known systems and a likely incomplete list. A conjectured three to five systems within the small fraction of a lightyear not covered by either Wikipedia or the Google-found article seems quite reasonable. We''ll go with the larger estimate for the benefit of the doubt.
Thus, for the purposes of everyone's sanity and keeping the math simple, and since I'm not an actual NASA astronomer -- I'm not a NASA anything, and as close as I get to astronomy is being something of a 'space cadet' in daily life (as I'm sure you can tell by now) -- let's keep those numbers at exactly 413 stars, within 292 systems, across 32 lightyears, and we'll assume that each of the 64 stars with planets belongs to a different star system. As such, we have 64 systems with planets... 114 planets, per Wikipedia, as mentioned before, of which 21 are considered potentially habitable.
But how probable is the development of an extraterrestrial spacefaring race? Kind of hard to say, but we're doing back-of-the-envelope astrometrics here. A 2020 study by a Professor David Kipping at Columbia, based on the so-called Drake Equation (look it up) puts the likelihood of life evolving to the point where it is "complex, differentiated, and intelligent" -- meaning, at least in the most abstract sense possible, a bit like humanity, at about 3:2 odds. That works out to a 60% likelihood that you get a race at least capable of dropping Bill, Bob, and Val on the Mun in something seemingly high-tech but also rather cobbled-together and then just doing space stations in orbit for the next roughly 100 years :P
So. A little math. 292 star systems, 64 with planets. 114 planets, 21 potentially habitable. 60% chance of life on the habitable planets. Those are our starting numbers. Using a bit of math that you should have learned in grade school, we get the following: 21.9% chance of a given star system having at least one planet -- 18.4% chance of a given planet being habitable -- 11.1% chance of a given habitable planet having an actual spacefaring race on it (let's be at least a _little_ optimistic!).
From that, we get that, presuming 200 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 stars in the current known universe, 894 571 200 000 000 000 000 of them likely have spacefaring races.
Let's get a little closer to home, though... slightly literally. The Milky Way Galaxy has approximately 100 billion stars in it. Given that our earlier numbers indicated 413 stars across 292 systems, we can extrapolate that there are roughly 70 700 000 000 (70.7 billion) star systems in our galaxy. That gives us a bit over 316.2 million planets with spacefaring races (if you want to be obnoxious in math class, it's 316, 230, 919 planets, on the dot).
Mind you, the margin of error in here from compound estimation, potential manual error, and less-than-unquestionable sources would likely be of career-ending magnitude if someone actually were fool enough to try and present this as a proper academic study set with reasonably valid data, but I'm just one idiot out of something like 7 billion of em on a lonely little blue dot, and I waste space for a living. Besides, this is a UA-cam comment, and it's not even Technology Connections guy's channel. If you want to be pedantic, go talk to him! ( :P )
I had some trouble figuring out whether this was a Snuffy out of context video or just normal Snuffy
Turns out Snuffy's context is constantly out of context
😂true 😁.
Snuffy: "In terms of context, I have no context."
05:11 Well, .. well.. where have you brought me today, magic school bus, called youtube algorithm...?!
I have to say that was, an interesting thought process...
Thanks for being you.
Hole: Exists
Snuffy: "Ok, get in"
i want a loop of Snuffy dancing the Bird of Paradise outro song 🥺
When will some other species build stuff?
Beavers: *just vibing*
I love this newest episode of Ancient Aliens ft. Snuffy
6:22 that voice hit different...
I keep forgetting Snuffy is down abysmal and then she hits me with an uppercut of thirst
Well, Snuffy was kind of right, everything that was trying to be intelligent we killed them, like a long time ago.
What are you on about?
Nah we just fucked them into our genome this why some people have neanderthal dna in them
@@PeachDragon_ I wouldn’t say “we” killed them. We just survived better. Literally natural selection and survival of the fittest but it’s actually survival of the most intelligent lol
I mean there are animals that are smarter than us technically, like dolphins.
@@michaelsimao495
Humanity's flowchart:
If fuckable: fuck.
If not fuckable: kill
6:00 - "they're effing in the vegeta-hole."
that straight vibe at the end tho
No shame. Donut County has the _best_ soundtrack, and Bird of Paradise is its _peak_ .
1:12 Me : self control, self control Nersha . Don't say something you'll probably regret. This is so lewd Snuffy 😁.
Man, I thought I was the only one who got deep thoughts while on the toilet. It's why I call it "the thinking chair" 🤔😁
This editing is so fire
Perhaps we should take Snuffys advice and begin to uplift our fellow primates into society, because some people in this world truly haven't reached the required level of intelligence to justify them living
5:00 dolphins speak theare own laguage
This is my comfort video
so many amazing lines in this one XD
HONK for the best racoon out there! Snuffy the Racoon God
What's good Snuffy? Keep up the great work 👍🏾
3:56 that shit was deep
Geez Louise. Stop the quacks
I need more of this style of content please
I see snuffy video. I click
The word you are looking for is sentient
6:55 - rule 63 grouch.
We all know why she loves corn. And if you don't, look up her tiktok reactions.
5:10
Look far enough and the internet will agree with this
I belive in snuffy supremacy
Local Racoon Girl stuffs a hole until it stretches open wider. (Will the carrot fit now?!?!)
Snuffy is literally my only twitch Sub.
I dont expected Big Brain Snuffy
That soundtrack when you were talking about your deep thoughts. Is it the bgm for factorio?
Donut Country is such a good game... and HOLY FUCK I forgot about the bunnys!!!
Love the content keep up the good work
snuffys entire rant im just thinking 'has she not seen what crows can do?' lol
I have heard that song before. The one where she was going off on a tangent. But from where?
i can't remember when i stopped thinking like snuffy... anyways, i better get a sammich right now
Snuffy is insane in the most wonderfully, fantastic way! I love her!
for a time there were creatures that were our close relatives that were around our intelegence maybe a bit more maybe a bit less, but our ancestors likely killed them all. Many of us have hybrid dna.
Also, a fun fact (incase you didnt know) our species homo sapien, wasnt the first to use tools or fire, it was an earlier hominid species.
I'm so glad you played this! I love this game!
Funny story about snuffies theory: we haven't encountered any superior lifeforms yet because our species has hit an evolutionary wall. Sadly if we continue the way we are now we won't overcome that wall.
Dolphins are real real close
isn't there an idea that augmentation is the next step in evolution? like we just have to get gud with tech and then that happens?
When I take a dump I wonder why it takes me like 30 seconds to shoot it out and other people need a book to read or something like they’re in a doctors office 🤔
Whats the song used at around 4:20?
that music in the conspiracy theory thing seemed very familiar. Like iv heard it multiple times before, it think it's from a video game. Subnautica?
i’ve been on the fence about this game but now…….me want
Snuffy I wasn't too sure about you for awhile there
But your Shidding thought, that was profound.
I can subscribe to that thought
Thanks Snuffers, very cool!
1:13 and theres the vore/unbirth joke
Snuffy Hawkins has searched into the universe for the answers.
Actually Octopuses rival humans in the intelligence front
I love you snuffy lol your so freaking funny
You cannot possibly pay your editors enough
this is going into my wholesome encouragement stash thank you ;w;
does Snuffy know that Neanderthals were a thing...? And that we basically borderline genocided them out of existence? XD
Now this is some high quality content to eat dinner while watching :o
"we either killed the rest of them or we're like aliens"
Well we did kind of kill the Neanderthals, and they were at least as intelligent as us.
First delirious
Now Tomboy Raccoon wifue
Bliss
The Apes have entered the stone age
4:26 does she know about the existance of other galaxys?
i mean we never been everywhere so it can exist but we didn't find anything yet (if nasa is peaking the true i mean)
Snuffy…there were more species, we killed them…
Peak Snuffy right here
There were other species of humans that probably rivalled our intelligence but they're all dead now. Or we interbred with them so we became one. Also, crows probably have some form of language as they can accurately describe humans that were being dicks to them to other crows and pass their hatred on to their kids. If they don't die out and give them a bit of time they may compete with us. Also given the millions of years of life on this planet and the fact that most species have gone extinct some may have had human level intelligence but went extinct before they did anything with it. Humans spent most of our time as a species as hunter gatherers and if we went extinct before we created civilization there wouldn't be much evidence of our intelligence down the line. Plenty of other species come decently close to our intelligence too. Like give them one more point to their INT and they'd be at our level. So it's not that uncommon of a thing to evolve. I think we were just the first to push the limits of our intelligence for whatever reason because our hunter gatherer stage was our longest, most successful period so we probably had a reason to have to change. Didn't just do it because it was fun because it was miserable for a long time as we were figuring out farming. Like I heard one theory that humans were too successful at being hunter gatherers and couldn't support their populations so they decided to try to grow food and things just went downhill from there.
Those were my thoughts I had about your shidding thoughts that I also had while shidding.
Snuffy needs to sit on the toilet bowl more... Then we can get more life changing advice.
There were others snuffy, we just killed them all.
This was super fun stream to watch and loving these highlights haha. X3
At 4:54 and 4:48
What was the outro song?
Bird of Paradise - Daniel Koestner
*me when editing my vids same time watching her playing Donut County*
3:10 happen
Me: WHAT >.>?!?!
Watching Snuffy is the most soothing experience of my life.
Snuffy I love you!
"in first grade, I had a dream about a girl"
I mean monkeys have been building alters that we’re thinking could be for religion
There’s a Tom Ska joke to be made here.
you are going to loose your mind when you discover mushrooms have network intelligence and are sentient good luck with that one . I'm still having a conflict with that and the fact they are tasty fried .
I want the vod
@ 4:57 We had two species thousands of years ago that were at about the same level of intelligence as us (Homo Erectus and Neanderthals) and we killed them..
Go Homo Sapiens 💫
Did you take the pickle Snuffy?
That is, indeed, definitely, not vore. She said it herself.
I love u snuffy.
Chaotic Raccoon XD