That's not entirely correct. In the 17th century Spain was without any doubt the first world power, and they literally bullied the french and the entirely of Europe in multiple ocassions. The French came out as an European threat after the Thirty Years war and the Franco-Spanish war that continued the previous war on that century, and as the major european power after the Spanish Succession war in the 18th century, but still on that century the european majors were very balanced and Spain, France and a raising England were sitting on the same spot during most of the century, (with Spain smashing the english in the War of the Jenkins Ear, the english defeating both France and Spain a few years later), until the end of the American War of Independence, in wich France and Spain collaborated to defeat England, when everything broke in pieces.
@@jackiecheng7209 Yeah, after the Napoleonic Wars the British Empire raised as the undisputed first global power. At most you can argue that by the end of that century the German Empire was a serious contender.
To be honest while Britain was very rich it never had quite the same military might or cultural influence even at it's peak, in fact it is already very generous to give it the spot of "strongest" just for it's economic prowess. The most questionnable place would be the Russians, as they surely never reached the top in any significant indicator albeit perhaps population.
It took the whole europe to beat france. Later france beat russia china along britain only one defeat agains what will become germany and accomplished that while being what russia it currently is a strong power with no ally
The British empire have no proof of being the "strongest" as it did ALL of his war with the need and help of France. Also unlike the British empire, the French empire was fighting all of Europe even after a revolution and it didn't had colonies to support it at that time(except little islands in Americas)
"Byzantine" empire doesn't exist. It was not any continuation of the eastern roman empire. It WAS the eastern roman empire up until 476. After that it was THE Roman Empire.
Your right, it wasn't a continuation it was a completely seperate empire that rose after the fall of the roman empire. The greek Constantine who founded the empire considered him self to be greek not roman. And the empire began to spread the word of orthodox christianity NOT catholic christianity, So it was not even the roman empire at all.
Constantine the Great was a roman and the spilt of the roman empire was permanent under Theodosius. The Western Part have its capital in Milan and then Ravenna while the Eastern Part have its capital in Constantinople. Rome still the centre of both parts but they administrated by 2 emperors. When the west fell, the east continued to exist until the 4th crusade and the restoration under The Empire of Nicaea. and then the Fall of Constantinople in 1453
10:44 Qing Dynasty ruled by the Manchurian not The Han. The Yuan Dynasty was ruled by the Mongolian. Also , Han Chinese were invaded by many foreign nomadic powers around China. 🤣🤣
@@AncountN.2 Li dynasty were mixed (turco-mongol-han). As they lived near border with nomad tribes. His family were turkicised during Wei dynasty (tabgach rule).
@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRC what's your point here? The Tang Dynasty fought against the Turks and Tang Taizong demolished the Eastern part of the Khaganate. He have the title of "Khan of Heaven" is due to his conquest of the Mongolian Steppe and not because of his "ancestry". His succesors later forced the Western part of the Khaganate to be under Tang protectorate.They are Chinese, and identifies as Han Chinese (refer to the Old Book of Tang), they don't have a sliver connection to thier Turkish or Mongol ancestry. Don't speak on Chinese history with your superficial understanding in your Turkic biased point of view
what bugged me is tye complete neglect of the dutch empire wich was incredibly powerfull during the 1600s they had almsot the entire spice trade, had a HUGE naval fleet (bigger then spain france and england's fleet combined) and ruled various colonies,
Poder económico y poco mas, vuestro poderío naval sería en buques mercantes, pero en el aspecto naval militar los galeones españoles no tenían rival salvo los buques de los británicos. A los españoles nos comíais los güevos, así que menos humos
@@albertomartin3625 and thats why the dutch navy sailed up into the thames river,bombed half the brittish navy,and towed their biggest ship back to amsterdam with just economic power? no, they had many warships aswell
@@thecreaturebehindyou veo que teníais pelotas, unas cuantas veces desembarcamos los españoles en tierra de herejes también y nada hicieron por defenderlas, que pena que no fuimos aliados.
Weird that you brought up decolonisation and the downfall of the British Empire in the 18th century, even though that didnt happen until the mid 20th century. Britain's strength and dominance only increased during the 19th century after defeating Napoleon and establishing itself as THE colonial empire in the world. Reaching it's territorial height of around 1/4 of the world's landmass in 1920.
i think he just brings up every countries downfall and here he didn't mean that the British empire fell in the 18th century but rather that at one point it did fall
Very good video but I think you can also could mention about Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth if only because in XVII century Commonwealth have terriory from baltic sea to black sea and have a very strong army (Winged Polish Hussars), but the video is still very good :))
Japan didn't surrender after nuke bombing actually. They had a big army (around 1 million men) in China that was fighting USSR. When they lost the battle against USSR army then it was over. That's why technically September 2 (nukes were dropped on August 6 & 9) is the end of WW2, when Japan signed the act of surrendering.
normal, hungarians were a steppic people, part of group called Ougrians (they are three groups of steppic peoples : ougrians, turcs, and scythes). Several people of this group are know : Avars, Finnish, hungarians (called Magyars). The avars were pushed by the tuks, and incoroporated the rests of the Huns. They were absorbed by francs and slavic peoples are their defeat by Charlemagne. You can find traces of them in Croatia. Finnish established themselves in Finland. Maguars were defeated by Otto 1, and settled in hungary.
O Imperio Ibérico < 3 lets forget that the lack of care that the spanish had with the portuguese empire literlly lost them the trade route and a lot of territories but yk
All english channles are the same: When they show other empires the memes im the images: "they killed 10% pupulation, they sacked, they only wanted gold" When they show England: "it contributed to culture in all the world, global history, economies" They never tell the truth like killing millions of hunger in their collonies to import their products to England, slavery, apartheid, making the most populated country in the world drug addict for their own benefit (China's opium wars) Never ever listen to an english speaker talk about history, they just say lies or make up the truth
Spain being the first global empire in history and dominating not getting the 1st in any century is ridiculous, should be in 16th, 17th and 18th. British empire not being first in 18th is astonishing, even not being considered in 20th too, along the USA. And China not even mentioned in 21th... I wonder where this guy is from... 🤔
@@leviton6552 first of all they were trading posts and so did spain plus those posts were the way they would be allowed there to then start conquering those territories you would know that if you had read a bit on it and how they worked
@@umpoucolouca I get your point, but I dont talk only about territories, I also talk about influence, military power, trade routes, and things like having the first currency used globally in history
Bro for real forgelot Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, a country that occupied Moscow 3 times, pushed Ottomans south while defending against their numerous invasions, and that at one point in history, it controlled entire central Europe with balkans thought PU.
There are quite a few mistakes in the video. PLC not being mentioned there is one of them. I can understand the reason, as Eastern Europe was not that "relevant" as Western Europe, but, specially, the polish defeating the ottomans on the Battle of Kahlenberg on 1683, was one of the major events of that century.
1.- Spanish Empire didn't slave the indigenous natives. 2.- Spanish Empire hadn't colonies, they were Spain. 3.- Spanish Empire didn't steal gold. Only 20% went to Spain as taxes like IVA, the rest was used in their cities, roads, churchs,... 4.- Spanish Empire explored and stablished trade routes like Portuguese empire, why don't you mention it? Andrés de Urdaneta (discovered and plotted an easterly route across the Pacific Ocean), Juan Sebastian Elcano (completed the first circumnavigation of the Earth),... There are many more inconsistencies in this video on this topic.
6:57 that meme is a masterpiece because some "turks" hate him for doing that and I can't understand why. He was the only one that trying to make the country decent again while others tried to sell it to Britain
very biased video... You greatly underestimate the greatness of the Islamic empires. Edit: damn 100 reply for saying simple opnion, its really sounds like islamic empires make someone's mad lol, anyways, a lot of people below saying islamic empires are not the strongest, what is your Standards ? size, popularity, your school curiculum? it is not really necessary, islamic empires wasn't only great at war, they were the Builders of today's world, they were the ones who founded the modern medicine, mathematics, physics, instrumentation, herbology, navigation, engineering, and astronomy. On the other hand, they had the beautiful art of literature, poetry, religion, and architecture... It was an ideal civilization from a social and moral standpoint, far from the nonsense that they teach you in your European schools. When the Muslims were carefully calculating the dates of eclipses and solar eclipses, the Europeans were screaming in their streets about the ogre that swallowed the sun, a huge gap. Just because they declined in the past three centuries does not mean that they were not the great powers for more than ten centuries. Your European civilization, which was built on bloodshed and colonialism, was not the strongest and was in constant instability in ottomainc golden era, and abbasids were the world dominate between 8th and 12th century without any doubts, can you imagine a battles between with 1:5 man ratio for the enemy, and you easily win? that was the islamic empires battles mostly, like one islamic empire crush whole eruope is insane, we were the dominaters of 7th - 12th and 14th - 17th century and there is no doubt on that.
@@Vy367u bro dont be mad because they were actually hygenic and had good medicne and you should care because they basically created the moder world of medicine
I would love to know what "colonies" had Spain. They had provinces, not colonies. All the people in the empire had the same rights and were treated as equivalent civilians. Colonies were a french, holland and english invention. Soaniards were the only ones investing their earnings in the population of those countries. The first universities and civil buildings in America until much much later were from the spanish empire. Seeing those pictures about Cristobal Colombus, for example, is enough to realize that you haven't studied their history propertly.
@drexplained0 Your videos are just perfect.Their demand must be high in Hindi/Urdu Language as well in Indian region. So am I allowed to make a Fan UA-cam channel by your name as Oversimplified Hindi and post your videos in hindi?? If yes then tell me which procedure I must follow??
Él probablemente no sepa que la primera derrota napoleónica en campo abierto fue en la Bailén, o que un puñado de campesinos acabo con casi 300.000 soldados franceses en 6 años que duró la invasión, o no quiere comentarlo, viendo como ha hablado del imperio español.
In Europe, Holy Roman Empire never really experienced an unification process like France and Britain later. Even though the Ottonian house was the most powerful from Otto I, the power of the Emperor gradually became symbolic in favor of more powerful Germanic Princes with times, which makes HRE big (on a map), but sclerotic in multiple states. France also experienced this, in particular in 10th-12th centuries, with the Plantagenêt House (Angevin Empire) in exemple, but from the Battle of Bouvines in 1214, the Kingdom of France (Capetian House) emerged as the most powerful, especially with the reign of Louis IX. It began a process of unification on multiples centuries, where the power of the King never ceased to increase little by little (and not without difficulties) over his vassals, until the emergence of the absolute monarchy in the end of the 17th century. However, from beginning of 16th century, even if HRE re-emerged with the rise of the Habsburgs, Spain was in reality the Spearhead of the empire until middle-17th. Then France re-became the biggest power with the Bourbon dynasty (Louis XIV) until the end of the Napoleonic Wars. From then, British Empire became the biggest naval and colonial power in 19th century until its decline after WW2. Even if they never had been a continental power like France, Germany and Russia (in 20th century particularly).
Sick of this s*** bro, even I as a Mexican can sense it. We need to make our own movies/media about the empire because it's clear that the anglo-media with all it's reach doesn't care
@@trashcantacos Todos se comieron la leyenda negra, de España, incluso de México, nos victimizan, como si los mexicanos fuésemos insignificantes, los gringos no saben que más de cuarenta millones de mexicanos viven en su país, aparte de que trataron de exterminarnos ellos mismos, nunca pagaron sus deudas con España y sólo se aprovecharon. Algún día iberoamérica, hispanoamérica, España, Italia, Portugal y Grecia estaremos contra la falsa influencia de Estados unidos y sus demás títeres.
The black legend is overstated. Spaniards just say it, pretending like it’s had a big impact. It hasn’t, it’s not an excuse for the failures of the Spanish empire.
@@maxdavis7722 ¿Cuáles fallas del imperio español?, ¿el consejo de indias que dio voz a los nativos de América?, ¿las leyes de Burgos que dieron los primeros derechos a los nativos en todo el mundo?, ¿ó las leyes nuevas que les sucedieron?, ¿cómo el mito creado por Las Casas y De bree no tiene impacto según tú?, si es lo que siempre se dice, sin embargo, Inglaterra sí que cometió g palabra contra los nativos, hay pruebas, de España nunca hubo nada porque simpmemente no existió lo que dicen ustedes propagandistas, no pueden ni nombrar uno solo, creen que la viruela fue hecha a manos de españoles, también asumes la nacionalidad de los demás, puesto que soy hispanoamericano, no me dejo influenciar por gente como tú, el plan de emancipaciones forzadas de América se creó en Inglaterra, su nombre fue el plan Maitland, dejen de mentir, mitómanos.
They were very much aware the world didn’t look like that. This map is in German and has America “The New World” in the bottom left. So it’s an art piece not a map meant for navigation. This guy was either making a joke or needs to start using those dormant brain cells a little more.
There is very little impartiality in this video, right? (to give some examples according to the creator as a summary). -Spanish Empire: slaves (it was one of the powers of the time that had the least), killing natives (the vast majority died from diseases to which they were not immune or killed by other natives), stealing gold (the Spanish took much less than is thought, the Romans took more gold from Spain than Spain from Latin America), obtaining wealth (the Iberian Peninsula hardly benefited, most of what was extracted stayed in the colonies). Conclusion: nothing good from what is implied. -British Empire: exploration (the Spanish empire should not have had that XD), trade (the Spanish empire also traded a lot, like it opened new trade routes for all of Europe), colonies (it does not say anything bad about the treatment of the British) , a very important role in world history, shaping cultures, economies and political systems (all this is also contributed by other empires, the Spanish one too and it is not said). Conclusion: everything is good as it is implied. I say all this not to deny the importance of the British Empire, I am simply struck by the treatment given to some empires compared to others in a completely false way.
The spanish empire abolished native american slavery in 1512 burgos laws, That most died for other Native Americans is false (From the Spanish territories), Not counting diseases, 2 Million (lowest estimate) died as a direct cause of Spain. Spain discovered much more than the United Kingdom, discovery of America, First circumnavigation in history, Congo River, western coast of the Americas, from Alaska to Tierras de Fuego, Chile, Amazon, Antarctica, maybe Australia, Oceania (first), Hawaii and most Pacific Islands, Philippines, China and Japan, all of Southeast Asia. India and Sri Lanka (Iberian Union), Middle East and the Persian Gulf. Most of the current territory of the USA. Caribbean, Atlantic Ocean, Pacific, (the English did not have access through Spain)
Se la ha chupado demasiado a España en el siglo XVI,cuando Portugal aun después de Elcano tenía el comercio mundial en sus manos y el Imperio Otomano se soleaba a todos en Europa solo tras el tornaviaje en 1565 y Lepanto cambian las cosas.
@@danielguerrero894 el comercio mundial estaba bastante repartido, no solo en manos de Portugal, pero bueno que veo que tus comentarios van en el sentido de negar todo lo relacionado con España.
Can you do the same for the bc period? Dehli sultnate replled the mongols and you forgot the Gupta empire who eventually beat back the Huns and was replaced by the rajput kingdoms who stopped both Arabs and Huns and Turks for a while
@williamFromBirmingham Gupta was a superpower in the 4th & 5th centuries. They defeated the Huns in Gupta-Hunnic War. These were the same Huns who had completely destroyed the Western Roman Empire. Not only militarily but also they were by far the largest economy in the world. Chess & Zero also originated from the Gupta Empire
5th century is definitely the huns and 9th would either be the abbasids or the carolangian empire their alliance could’ve easily collapsed Byzantium I don’t think it’s even close
@@parthb.714you are talking about “Ak Hun” state, which is one off 3 Hun states that time. There were Asia hun state in Central Asia and Europe/Western Hun state in leadership of Attilla the gods whip. Asian and western hun state were the main powers. Ak hun were a smaller, a more experimental and expedition orientated creation, who expanded towards Southern Asia. The strongest nation were the western hun state in 5th century.
Spain in the 16th century was not nearly as rich from indian ocean trade or as navally powerful as Portugal. This entire video is the historical equivalent to brainrot
Spain in the 16th century and most of the 17th century (in wich Portugal was (forcefully) part of the Spanish Union under Spain) was literally the first global power and it was needed a half a century war against half of Germany, France (multiple times), England (multiple times), Netherlands (multiple times), Sweden (multiple times), Denmark, the ottomans, and the very portuguese, to dethrone them. The portuguese empire was indeed a strong country during the 16th centruy, as the most important battle of Diu shows, but the portuguese were never interested in european power struggles (or most likely they couldn't show any interest because his geographical position) and, ironically, the portuguese decline came right after the disolution of the union with Spain since both countries ended up fully drained after the Thirty Years war. But yes, the video saying that the ottomans were the strongest country in the 16th century makes no sense. They were relevant, yeah, but they were defeated in multiple consecutive occasions against Spain, Portugal, Austria and Poland, and they were clearly in decline since the start of the century.
Yeah so tze map at 1:45 is just false for anybody wondering, it was created in 1581 by Heinrich Bünting, The Map is called "Die Welt in einem Kleeblatt" (The world in a Clover) he is known for his phantasy maps such as this and "Europa als Reichskönigin" or "Asien als ein Pegasus"
desinformación, eso es lo que ha puesto en su video, busca y lee de los imperios que menciona y veras que muchas de las cosas que dice no son correctas
Watch the full Adventure Time story (made by my friends) ua-cam.com/video/PEpwTl8I3kk/v-deo.htmlsi=eZITcynnGut5cyqL
1:36 byzantium wasnt established by Constantine it was an ancient thracian settlement
The map in 1:46 is a fake , because explain how America appears on it if it had not been discovered yet.
Islam>
USA sucks is to woke an it will collapse
There are too many error in this video, specially about Spain, nearly all the Spanish empire part is fake.
Please be informed before anything else
12th century: nothing changed
13th century: everything changed💀
yep, Genghis Khan
Tbh Eastern Rome during the 12th century deserves credit, the Komnenians are chads
True
Did the mongol nation atack?
When the mongol nation attacked. Only the avatar, master of all four elements could stop them
Random empire: well, what can go wrong?
Dr. explained: take some internal conflits and external pressures
LOL😭😞
@@drexplained0I really love how you skipped Maurya, and Gupta empires.
Typical westerners...
You’ve made a mistake :
The French century is the XVIII-18th. The British century is the XIX-19th
Say that in anti furry terms
That's not entirely correct. In the 17th century Spain was without any doubt the first world power, and they literally bullied the french and the entirely of Europe in multiple ocassions. The French came out as an European threat after the Thirty Years war and the Franco-Spanish war that continued the previous war on that century, and as the major european power after the Spanish Succession war in the 18th century, but still on that century the european majors were very balanced and Spain, France and a raising England were sitting on the same spot during most of the century, (with Spain smashing the english in the War of the Jenkins Ear, the english defeating both France and Spain a few years later), until the end of the American War of Independence, in wich France and Spain collaborated to defeat England, when everything broke in pieces.
@@alejandroparra362 The British should be most powerful in 19th century right?
@alejandroparra362 finally! Someone with common sense and a few books read
@@jackiecheng7209 Yeah, after the Napoleonic Wars the British Empire raised as the undisputed first global power. At most you can argue that by the end of that century the German Empire was a serious contender.
Britain was absolutely the strongest country of the 19th century and not France
To be honest while Britain was very rich it never had quite the same military might or cultural influence even at it's peak, in fact it is already very generous to give it the spot of "strongest" just for it's economic prowess. The most questionnable place would be the Russians, as they surely never reached the top in any significant indicator albeit perhaps population.
It took the whole europe to beat france. Later france beat russia china along britain only one defeat agains what will become germany and accomplished that while being what russia it currently is a strong power with no ally
The British empire have no proof of being the "strongest" as it did ALL of his war with the need and help of France. Also unlike the British empire, the French empire was fighting all of Europe even after a revolution and it didn't had colonies to support it at that time(except little islands in Americas)
France was amongst the strongest in Europe during the Sun King's rule and Napoleon's rule, but the tricky part is it didn't last a whole century.
Yea British would be the 19th century and French would be 18th
"Byzantine" empire doesn't exist. It was not any continuation of the eastern roman empire. It WAS the eastern roman empire up until 476. After that it was THE Roman Empire.
And he was also horribly mistaken by claiming they were the strongest in the 9th century when people like Harun Rashid were decimating them.
This is the dumbest comment I have ever seen 😂 “Nazi empire doesn’t exist it’s a continuation of Germany” you people are hilarious
@@BigA678 clueless
Your right, it wasn't a continuation it was a completely seperate empire that rose after the fall of the roman empire. The greek Constantine who founded the empire considered him self to be greek not roman. And the empire began to spread the word of orthodox christianity NOT catholic christianity, So it was not even the roman empire at all.
Constantine the Great was a roman and the spilt of the roman empire was permanent under Theodosius. The Western Part have its capital in Milan and then Ravenna while the Eastern Part have its capital in Constantinople. Rome still the centre of both parts but they administrated by 2 emperors. When the west fell, the east continued to exist until the 4th crusade and the restoration under The Empire of Nicaea. and then the Fall of Constantinople in 1453
It's always the external issues 💀
+ Internal
But indeed, internal issue was a huge problem for every empires back than
@@miracleclone5793 especialy in the byzantine empire
@@miracleclone5793 and people say they were stronger internally than the countries now bullshit 👎
@@drexplained0Dude the map in 1:46 is fake, because how is America there if it hadn’t been discovered yet.
Intresting how the Ottomans stayed at the top for a long period of time
250 years
@@batu3507 almost 300 i think
@@hailgerald2060 they werent strongest in the 17th century
@@batu3507 my bad i was thinking bout the lifespan of that empire which was 600 yrs i think
@@hailgerald2060 their lifespan were 622 years
Hidden gem of a channel!
Cool vid. There are some mistakes, but overall its great for beginners
napoleonic Empire
*insert royalist here*
Colonial Empire
*insert napoleon here*
wtf
India had many empires apart from islamic empires like Mauryan, Guta and Chola dynasties
I really love how he skipped Maurya, and Gupta empires.
Typical westerners...
Random empire: exists
Internal conflicts and external pressures: allow us to introduce ourselves
The British were without a doubt the most powerful country in the 19th Century and that never got mentioned
Cry about it 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🦅
@@raptorbrotherhood766America wasn't the strongest during that century bro what are you on about lmao
@@raptorbrotherhood766 America was nowhere near the strongest in that century dumbass
nah , napoleon was better
@@sanssucreajoute6554 france was better for 15 years tops. 1800 to 1815. 1816 onwards Britian overtook
🗿🇬🇷Byzantine Empire🤝🗿🇮🇷Sasanian Empire
Rashidun caliphate jumpscare
@@jaywee6430Umayyad caliphate jumpscare
Timurids, Ottoman, Golden horde: Traitor 😡
Sasanian Empire: 😒
That's not the Sasanian empire flag
But there's no sasanian emoji
4 of the empires are Turkish (Seljuk, Ottoman, Mugal and Timurid)
Golden horde
@@lacomplationgolden horde was mongol
@@lacomplation that was mongol 🤦🏿♂️
@@James_newTurkified Mongols
@@James_new i would call turco-mongol just like timurid empire
Han dynasty: Am I joke for you?
I really love how he skipped Maurya, and Gupta empires.
Typical westerners...
10:44 Qing Dynasty ruled by the Manchurian not The Han. The Yuan Dynasty was ruled by the Mongolian.
Also , Han Chinese were invaded by many foreign nomadic powers around China.
🤣🤣
3:03 and Tang dynasty was ruled by Turco-Mongols. Tang Taizong had a title "Tengri Khagan" "Celestial Holy Emperor".
@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRC ???, he was Han, just look at the name
@@AncountN.2 Li dynasty were mixed (turco-mongol-han). As they lived near border with nomad tribes. His family were turkicised during Wei dynasty (tabgach rule).
@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRC what's your point here? The Tang Dynasty fought against the Turks and Tang Taizong demolished the Eastern part of the Khaganate. He have the title of "Khan of Heaven" is due to his conquest of the Mongolian Steppe and not because of his "ancestry". His succesors later forced the Western part of the Khaganate to be under Tang protectorate.They are Chinese, and identifies as Han Chinese (refer to the Old Book of Tang), they don't have a sliver connection to thier Turkish or Mongol ancestry. Don't speak on Chinese history with your superficial understanding in your Turkic biased point of view
@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRCnot turco-mongol it's mongol
what bugged me is tye complete neglect of the dutch empire wich was incredibly powerfull during the 1600s they had almsot the entire spice trade, had a HUGE naval fleet (bigger then spain france and england's fleet combined) and ruled various colonies,
Poder económico y poco mas, vuestro poderío naval sería en buques mercantes, pero en el aspecto naval militar los galeones españoles no tenían rival salvo los buques de los británicos. A los españoles nos comíais los güevos, así que menos humos
@@albertomartin3625 and thats why the dutch navy sailed up into the thames river,bombed half the brittish navy,and towed their biggest ship back to amsterdam with just economic power?
no, they had many warships aswell
@@thecreaturebehindyou veo que teníais pelotas, unas cuantas veces desembarcamos los españoles en tierra de herejes también y nada hicieron por defenderlas, que pena que no fuimos aliados.
Do some research Portugal was the pioneer in the 1600s
@@Lazone5 and that is why the dutch stole the entire spice trade from them?
Weird that you brought up decolonisation and the downfall of the British Empire in the 18th century, even though that didnt happen until the mid 20th century. Britain's strength and dominance only increased during the 19th century after defeating Napoleon and establishing itself as THE colonial empire in the world. Reaching it's territorial height of around 1/4 of the world's landmass in 1920.
i think he just brings up every countries downfall and here he didn't mean that the British empire fell in the 18th century but rather that at one point it did fall
By 1920 it had already been weakened and increasingly displaced by other countries such as the USA. WW2 ended with the British
love the memes was learning and laughing at the same time 😂
Awesome memes subbed
Very good video but I think you can also could mention about Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth if only because in XVII century Commonwealth have terriory from baltic sea to black sea and have a very strong army (Winged Polish Hussars), but the video is still very good :))
@@Napolitano-Lazo didnt they fall on venice?????
Cool video man. I like your content a lot
Cool profile pic
@@nibiru27 You must love Big Brother. It is not enough to obey him: you must love him.
@@user-os2yp6ph2z literally 1984
con la foto esta todo dicho, anda lee e infórmate un poco, el vídeo esta lleno de imprecisiones y mentiras mal intencionadas
Poland overslept again
It wasn't expansionist
@@leno_o17 **ehem**
@@johnharlanabila1740 ??
@@leno_o17 ssssh you seen nothing about those edits alright
@@johnharlanabila1740 sorry I don't understand what you mean. Can you say it with the whole sentence?
Wish you add the military budget for the US but great video!
Why?
@@pxj16 because it rounds at about $820.2 billion.
@@KatyRoberts-l2u but how is it related to the video?
???
@@KatyRoberts-l2uHe's correct it has no baring on the video, all it does is stroke your precious American ego.
Japan didn't surrender after nuke bombing actually. They had a big army (around 1 million men) in China that was fighting USSR. When they lost the battle against USSR army then it was over. That's why technically September 2 (nukes were dropped on August 6 & 9) is the end of WW2, when Japan signed the act of surrendering.
12:51 "belgium" *circles netherlands* "netherlands" *points to north germany*
LOL
u got a good eye ngl
4:00 the earliest threat fun fact were the hungarians causing raids as west of italy 😮
normal, hungarians were a steppic people, part of group called Ougrians (they are three groups of steppic peoples : ougrians, turcs, and scythes).
Several people of this group are know : Avars, Finnish, hungarians (called Magyars).
The avars were pushed by the tuks, and incoroporated the rests of the Huns. They were absorbed by francs and slavic peoples are their defeat by Charlemagne. You can find traces of them in Croatia.
Finnish established themselves in Finland.
Maguars were defeated by Otto 1, and settled in hungary.
Fun fact: the Spanish Empire and the Portuguese Empire once combinated by a few years, making it the biggest empire ever existed
Es un canal anglosajón. La leyenda negra contra España es imperativo
O Imperio Ibérico < 3 lets forget that the lack of care that the spanish had with the portuguese empire literlly lost them the trade route and a lot of territories but yk
What? That’s not true, it was never the biggest.
“I have ten million power in rise of kingdoms.”
All english channles are the same:
When they show other empires the memes im the images: "they killed 10% pupulation, they sacked, they only wanted gold"
When they show England: "it contributed to culture in all the world, global history, economies"
They never tell the truth like killing millions of hunger in their collonies to import their products to England, slavery, apartheid, making the most populated country in the world drug addict for their own benefit (China's opium wars)
Never ever listen to an english speaker talk about history, they just say lies or make up the truth
Friend: How many memes do u wanna use
Him: Yes
Spain being the first global empire in history and dominating not getting the 1st in any century is ridiculous, should be in 16th, 17th and 18th. British empire not being first in 18th is astonishing, even not being considered in 20th too, along the USA. And China not even mentioned in 21th... I wonder where this guy is from... 🤔
Portugal was the first...not spain ummm...
@@umpoucoloucaEstablishing fishing posts along the coasts doesn't make you a global empire lmao
@@leviton6552 first of all they were trading posts and so did spain plus those posts were the way they would be allowed there to then start conquering those territories you would know that if you had read a bit on it and how they worked
@@umpoucolouca I get your point, but I dont talk only about territories, I also talk about influence, military power, trade routes, and things like having the first currency used globally in history
@@victorwild3188 Spain was literally able to do it bc of the Union of the Iberian Empire 😭😭likeeee 😭
First and Second Bulgarian Empires left the chat
@Atakan-ln2xv your not important to society 😑
@Atakan-ln2xv your mom doesn't love you, your dad left you, your grandma doesn't love you and you'll grow up to be Adam Sandler
History must never be censored
1:46 maps in that time were way more advanced than that, it's just a religious representation.
And also why is America in the bottom left if this was from before the discovery of America.😂😂😂😂
The china and India we're so underrated, no cap
Nice grammar
@@keannoxyrenceesquivel2349
Who cares about grammar?
Cant tell if this channel is one of those ai content farms or not
The voice seems kinda fake, and there were definitely some AI images in there
it definitely is
"It's over napoleon I have the high ground" amazing
Bro for real forgelot Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, a country that occupied Moscow 3 times, pushed Ottomans south while defending against their numerous invasions, and that at one point in history, it controlled entire central Europe with balkans thought PU.
There are quite a few mistakes in the video. PLC not being mentioned there is one of them. I can understand the reason, as Eastern Europe was not that "relevant" as Western Europe, but, specially, the polish defeating the ottomans on the Battle of Kahlenberg on 1683, was one of the major events of that century.
Fr bro people just dont care ab other countries
Indian history is underrated ☠️
They only study their history and act like they know world history...🤭
Thank you!
The Maurya and Gupta Empires: Looks like you forgot something...
They are more isolated to just the indian subcobtinent they werent the most powerful in asin therefor anywhere else for that matter
Ottoman empire =Turkey 🇹🇷
Timurid empire =Uzbekistan 🇺🇿
Seljuk empire=Turkmenistan 🇹🇲
turkic domination also add mughal empire
@Arvin484 it was a Turkic empire which established in todays Iran also most Turkic states after converting to Islam used Persian alphabet
@Arvin484 tomb of my grandfather is located in uk he is no english tho iykyk
Seljuk Empire=Turkey
Turkmenistan=Russian cannonfodder
Absolutely not. Atatürk created a secular country.
If you see a lot of this, there’s a pattern on how each empire became strong, than ultimately fall due to conflicts within their own empire
1.- Spanish Empire didn't slave the indigenous natives.
2.- Spanish Empire hadn't colonies, they were Spain.
3.- Spanish Empire didn't steal gold. Only 20% went to Spain as taxes like IVA, the rest was used in their cities, roads, churchs,...
4.- Spanish Empire explored and stablished trade routes like Portuguese empire, why don't you mention it? Andrés de Urdaneta (discovered and plotted an easterly route across the Pacific Ocean), Juan Sebastian Elcano (completed the first circumnavigation of the Earth),...
There are many more inconsistencies in this video on this topic.
Is this a joke or genuine brain rot? I can't tell anymore.
@@joekennedy4093 you only need a book
Oh in your schools they really teach you like this? Pathetic.
@@Phitend Unfortunately no. They are teaching Spanish Black Legend.
@@Phitend Read about the black legend
6:57 that meme is a masterpiece because some "turks" hate him for doing that and I can't understand why. He was the only one that trying to make the country decent again while others tried to sell it to Britain
very biased video... You greatly underestimate the greatness of the Islamic empires.
Edit: damn 100 reply for saying simple opnion, its really sounds like islamic empires make someone's mad lol, anyways, a lot of people below saying islamic empires are not the strongest, what is your Standards ? size, popularity, your school curiculum? it is not really necessary, islamic empires wasn't only great at war, they were the Builders of today's world, they were the ones who founded the modern medicine, mathematics, physics, instrumentation, herbology, navigation, engineering, and astronomy. On the other hand, they had the beautiful art of literature, poetry, religion, and architecture... It was an ideal civilization from a social and moral standpoint, far from the nonsense that they teach you in your European schools.
When the Muslims were carefully calculating the dates of eclipses and solar eclipses, the Europeans were screaming in their streets about the ogre that swallowed the sun, a huge gap.
Just because they declined in the past three centuries does not mean that they were not the great powers for more than ten centuries. Your European civilization, which was built on bloodshed and colonialism, was not the strongest and was in constant instability in ottomainc golden era, and abbasids were the world dominate between 8th and 12th century without any doubts, can you imagine a battles between with 1:5 man ratio for the enemy, and you easily win? that was the islamic empires battles mostly, like one islamic empire crush whole eruope is insane, we were the dominaters of 7th - 12th and 14th - 17th century and there is no doubt on that.
Who cares lol
Islamic empires where strong but weren’t the strongest
@@Vy367u bro dont be mad because they were actually hygenic and had good medicne and you should care because they basically created the moder world of medicine
@@Vy367u And you do care because you watched the video and the person who made the video also cares so yeah
@@YaxCore I ain't mad lol
I would love to know what "colonies" had Spain. They had provinces, not colonies. All the people in the empire had the same rights and were treated as equivalent civilians. Colonies were a french, holland and english invention. Soaniards were the only ones investing their earnings in the population of those countries. The first universities and civil buildings in America until much much later were from the spanish empire.
Seeing those pictures about Cristobal Colombus, for example, is enough to realize that you haven't studied their history propertly.
They love to lie about our empire
Very good.
I like how basically every empire died to internal strife
07:04 Recep İvedik
Everybody gangsta until they face internal strife and external pressure
All century
1st century=0ad
2nd century=100ad
3rd century=200ad
4th century=300ad
5th century=400ad
6th century=500ad
7th century=600ad
10 likes for part 2
What?
@drexplained0 Your videos are just perfect.Their demand must be high in Hindi/Urdu Language as well in Indian region. So am I allowed to make a Fan UA-cam channel by your name as Oversimplified Hindi and post your videos in hindi??
If yes then tell me which procedure I must follow??
i like how the guy is neutral and doesnt disrespect any empire/dynasty etc
Doing so during part of the Spanish empire shows that Native Americans were slaves, When slavery was abolished in 1512 burgos laws
Literlly made fun of the Portuguese but okay pls
This guy for some reason doesn't like Portuguese and Spanish or he simply is ignorant about history
that guy with the super stealth tech from the 1-13th he scary man
0:12 0:13 added to my sabaton random images playlist
LOL😭
The fact i noticed the "Batu Khan" reference tells i have a fucked up sense of humor
The sheer number of memes this man uses
13:33 Spain, dude,Spain ,☝🏼
Él probablemente no sepa que la primera derrota napoleónica en campo abierto fue en la Bailén, o que un puñado de campesinos acabo con casi 300.000 soldados franceses en 6 años que duró la invasión, o no quiere comentarlo, viendo como ha hablado del imperio español.
In Europe, Holy Roman Empire never really experienced an unification process like France and Britain later. Even though the Ottonian house was the most powerful from Otto I, the power of the Emperor gradually became symbolic in favor of more powerful Germanic Princes with times, which makes HRE big (on a map), but sclerotic in multiple states.
France also experienced this, in particular in 10th-12th centuries, with the Plantagenêt House (Angevin Empire) in exemple, but from the Battle of Bouvines in 1214, the Kingdom of France (Capetian House) emerged as the most powerful, especially with the reign of Louis IX. It began a process of unification on multiples centuries, where the power of the King never ceased to increase little by little (and not without difficulties) over his vassals, until the emergence of the absolute monarchy in the end of the 17th century.
However, from beginning of 16th century, even if HRE re-emerged with the rise of the Habsburgs, Spain was in reality the Spearhead of the empire until middle-17th. Then France re-became the biggest power with the Bourbon dynasty (Louis XIV) until the end of the Napoleonic Wars.
From then, British Empire became the biggest naval and colonial power in 19th century until its decline after WW2. Even if they never had been a continental power like France, Germany and Russia (in 20th century particularly).
The flag of the Confederation of the Rhine had a flag similar to Sierra Leone but with a darker shading
This video has many errors in general. learn history or don't do this
The Mughal emperors were basically just timurids 😊
Internal strife and external pressures got so many real ones 😢
First Bulgarian Empire left the chat.
Internal strife + External pressure= History noted👀👀
3:30 Thats me!
How are you?
Long time no see😂
The Roman Empire began at 27 BC, and ended at 1453 AD.
An empire lasting 1480 years, and the longest lasting empire in Europe. Sheeesh.
Plus Kingdom of Rome and Roman Republick it lasted 2 206 years
Not "NAZ" it was Germany
Das Deutsche Reich. Dankeschön.
bro could've explained world history in just family guy images 💀
The fact pre-columbian civilizations fell was because the same pre-columbians who attacked the mayor civilizations, and 300 horses
Fake
@@Galletas-my3sv fake is your father figure
@@malesacrificium Boy, besides, they weren't civilizations, they were states.
Turkey used to be badass… and have been around so long and stayed strong long too...
Iran was one of the most powerful countries in the world during the Safavid period
fax
Safavids was Turkic
no
Spanish black legend.
Facts
Sick of this s*** bro, even I as a Mexican can sense it. We need to make our own movies/media about the empire because it's clear that the anglo-media with all it's reach doesn't care
@@trashcantacos Todos se comieron la leyenda negra, de España, incluso de México, nos victimizan, como si los mexicanos fuésemos insignificantes, los gringos no saben que más de cuarenta millones de mexicanos viven en su país, aparte de que trataron de exterminarnos ellos mismos, nunca pagaron sus deudas con España y sólo se aprovecharon.
Algún día iberoamérica, hispanoamérica, España, Italia, Portugal y Grecia estaremos contra la falsa influencia de Estados unidos y sus demás títeres.
The black legend is overstated. Spaniards just say it, pretending like it’s had a big impact. It hasn’t, it’s not an excuse for the failures of the Spanish empire.
@@maxdavis7722 ¿Cuáles fallas del imperio español?, ¿el consejo de indias que dio voz a los nativos de América?, ¿las leyes de Burgos que dieron los primeros derechos a los nativos en todo el mundo?, ¿ó las leyes nuevas que les sucedieron?, ¿cómo el mito creado por Las Casas y De bree no tiene impacto según tú?, si es lo que siempre se dice, sin embargo, Inglaterra sí que cometió g palabra contra los nativos, hay pruebas, de España nunca hubo nada porque simpmemente no existió lo que dicen ustedes propagandistas, no pueden ni nombrar uno solo, creen que la viruela fue hecha a manos de españoles, también asumes la nacionalidad de los demás, puesto que soy hispanoamericano, no me dejo influenciar por gente como tú, el plan de emancipaciones forzadas de América se creó en Inglaterra, su nombre fue el plan Maitland, dejen de mentir, mitómanos.
great work
USA:IF GOD HAD WANTED U TO LIVE HE WOULS NOT HAVE CREATED ME!!!
Where is the VOC??
The Byzantine Empire was my favorite… but I didn’t know that they believed that this what the world was like 💀☠️: 1:45
I don’t think that’s a Byzantine map and fairly legible early modern German is on it so it’s probably from like the 1500s or something
They were very much aware the world didn’t look like that. This map is in German and has America “The New World” in the bottom left. So it’s an art piece not a map meant for navigation. This guy was either making a joke or needs to start using those dormant brain cells a little more.
I would love if you mentioned the Iberian Empire as a whole.
There is very little impartiality in this video, right? (to give some examples according to the creator as a summary).
-Spanish Empire: slaves (it was one of the powers of the time that had the least), killing natives (the vast majority died from diseases to which they were not immune or killed by other natives), stealing gold (the Spanish took much less than is thought, the Romans took more gold from Spain than Spain from Latin America), obtaining wealth (the Iberian Peninsula hardly benefited, most of what was extracted stayed in the colonies).
Conclusion: nothing good from what is implied.
-British Empire: exploration (the Spanish empire should not have had that XD), trade (the Spanish empire also traded a lot, like it opened new trade routes for all of Europe), colonies (it does not say anything bad about the treatment of the British) , a very important role in world history, shaping cultures, economies and political systems (all this is also contributed by other empires, the Spanish one too and it is not said).
Conclusion: everything is good as it is implied.
I say all this not to deny the importance of the British Empire, I am simply struck by the treatment given to some empires compared to others in a completely false way.
The spanish empire abolished native american slavery in 1512 burgos laws, That most died for other Native Americans is false (From the Spanish territories), Not counting diseases, 2 Million (lowest estimate) died as a direct cause of Spain.
Spain discovered much more than the United Kingdom, discovery of America, First circumnavigation in history, Congo River, western coast of the Americas, from Alaska to Tierras de Fuego, Chile, Amazon, Antarctica, maybe Australia, Oceania (first), Hawaii and most Pacific Islands, Philippines, China and Japan, all of Southeast Asia. India and Sri Lanka (Iberian Union), Middle East and the Persian Gulf. Most of the current territory of the USA. Caribbean, Atlantic Ocean, Pacific, (the English did not have access through Spain)
Se la ha chupado demasiado a España en el siglo XVI,cuando Portugal aun después de Elcano tenía el comercio mundial en sus manos y el Imperio Otomano se soleaba a todos en Europa solo tras el tornaviaje en 1565 y Lepanto cambian las cosas.
@@danielguerrero894 el comercio mundial estaba bastante repartido, no solo en manos de Portugal, pero bueno que veo que tus comentarios van en el sentido de negar todo lo relacionado con España.
@@danielguerrero894BATTLE O.F DJERBA
@@SmaruluSs La ganaron los otomanos.
how am i supposed to explain my source to my history teacher
Don't
Research yourself
Anyone else notice there’s like 4 channels exactly like this that literally make the exact same videos
Yes
👍👍👍
so cool
Can you do the same for the bc period? Dehli sultnate replled the mongols and you forgot the Gupta empire who eventually beat back the Huns and was replaced by the rajput kingdoms who stopped both Arabs and Huns and Turks for a while
Sure the Delhi Sultanate repelled the Mongols, but it was like their first point for the standings against the Mongols 20 if you know what I’m saying
@@rkdehart7351 no they also beat the rajput warriors and other rajput kingdoms
@@rkdehart7351 they repelled mongol inversions for a good 100 years
@williamFromBirmingham every Indian empire like Gupta was richer than Europe combined and Gupta was the golden age.
@williamFromBirmingham Gupta was a superpower in the 4th & 5th centuries. They defeated the Huns in Gupta-Hunnic War. These were the same Huns who had completely destroyed the Western Roman Empire. Not only militarily but also they were by far the largest economy in the world. Chess & Zero also originated from the Gupta Empire
Empire: a
Internal strife and external pressure: no.
5th century is definitely the huns and 9th would either be the abbasids or the carolangian empire their alliance could’ve easily collapsed Byzantium I don’t think it’s even close
Guptas defeated both Huns and Sassanins
@@parthb.714 they were not much contribution from guptas to defeat huns, there were other small indian kingdoms who expelled hunns from india
@@parthb.714you are talking about “Ak Hun” state, which is one off 3 Hun states that time. There were Asia hun state in Central Asia and Europe/Western Hun state in leadership of Attilla the gods whip. Asian and western hun state were the main powers. Ak hun were a smaller, a more experimental and expedition orientated creation, who expanded towards Southern Asia. The strongest nation were the western hun state in 5th century.
@@parthb.714 Western Hun Empire;
*Am I a joke to you*
2:06 it doesnt matter which time or place you are in, Duo will find you anyway
Spain in the 16th century was not nearly as rich from indian ocean trade or as navally powerful as Portugal. This entire video is the historical equivalent to brainrot
Spain in the 16th century and most of the 17th century (in wich Portugal was (forcefully) part of the Spanish Union under Spain) was literally the first global power and it was needed a half a century war against half of Germany, France (multiple times), England (multiple times), Netherlands (multiple times), Sweden (multiple times), Denmark, the ottomans, and the very portuguese, to dethrone them. The portuguese empire was indeed a strong country during the 16th centruy, as the most important battle of Diu shows, but the portuguese were never interested in european power struggles (or most likely they couldn't show any interest because his geographical position) and, ironically, the portuguese decline came right after the disolution of the union with Spain since both countries ended up fully drained after the Thirty Years war.
But yes, the video saying that the ottomans were the strongest country in the 16th century makes no sense. They were relevant, yeah, but they were defeated in multiple consecutive occasions against Spain, Portugal, Austria and Poland, and they were clearly in decline since the start of the century.
Ya, bueno, pero el video habla del más fuerte, no del más rico.
Y navalmente en el siglo 16 Portugal dejó de tener la armada más poderosa.
@@alejandroparra362 that is a good point, thx
This video is terrible
Yeah so tze map at 1:45 is just false for anybody wondering, it was created in 1581 by Heinrich Bünting, The Map is called "Die Welt in einem Kleeblatt" (The world in a Clover) he is known for his phantasy maps such as this and "Europa als Reichskönigin" or "Asien als ein Pegasus"
Thank you for informations
desinformación, eso es lo que ha puesto en su video, busca y lee de los imperios que menciona y veras que muchas de las cosas que dice no son correctas
@@albertomartin3625yeah
very clear bias against the spanish empire, can't expect more from a brit
France is the strongest country in the 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th and first half of 20th centuries.
Lol what 😂
Very good speech
You forgot about Macedonian empire 😡
I have put the countries AD only😭😭
That was in B.C.
Can you read and hear
@@drexplained0 What about Gupta Empire?
Lol almost f by some locals of brahmin city near multan
I can't believe he missed the achievements of the Abbasid Empire 💀
Can't wait to see some kazaks trying to claim golden horde because they was majority of population
Two months have gone and you are still waiting.
@@Lipovanus Kazaks/Hasags disappointed me
Very euro centric video
WHERE MY BOY BULGARIAN EMPIRE EVEN YOU FORGOTTEN ABOUT ITT 😭😭😭😭
Out of the entire century, they were definitely not the strongest
Perhaps he is a Byzaboo who is still salty for what the Bulgarians had done in 811 and then the early 900s!