I skied down a bowl and I was on my Enforcer 104 Free and the guy I skied with was on the Enforcer 94s.. It was windblown, mogully, and flat light.. He was faster on and off his edges than I was and he had no problems with the conditions..
Thanks for all the great reviews guys. I have skied Enforcer 94 and 100 for at least 8 years. Great skis. 5'9, 175 lbs, advanced/expert skier and ski patroller. I have loved the shorter lengths 168 (original) and then moved to 172. I have never had a need for longer. I love short to medium turns, venturing into glades, backsides, and powder. Great east and west. I found the 94 little easier since the 100 does get a little heavy at times. These skis are great for everything.
Enforcer are amazing skiis in torn up crud, choppy snow, slopes.feels like riding on rails. Skiis i tried this week. Enforcer 94, ranger 94,kore 93. Sender 94, in that order. not sure how enforcer does it. Feels so effortlessl and smooth. Haven't tried völkl Mantra. Staff says its similar but with even more stability. Ranger is great on ice and can be rotated easily. Better for woods and parks. 100kg, 170cm, 168-178 cm skiis tested. Skiing for 40+ years.
Definitely try the Mantra--I find it to be more precise than the Enforcer, but not more stable. I think that 94 is about as versatile and smooth as a ski can possibly get.
Hi, I'm thinking of getting all mountain skis for the first time. I have been skiing my whole life and would classify myself as a relatively good skier. Am 23 years old. My thinking is just that I want a ski that works everywhere, on all kinds of surfaces, if you understand. First I looked at the Atomic maverick 95 ti, but now got a bit into the Enforcer models. Checked both the 94 and 100 model. Which one would you recommend and what length? I am 186cm tall and weigh 85kg. Very good video with very good information! :)
I think the mid-90's is the place to be for what you're looking to do. I'd go with the Enforcer 94 as they take the sturdiness to the next level over the Maverick. I'd go with the 186.
Hello! I stumbled across this channel as I am trying to find skis to buy instead of constantly renting. I'm 5'7" 160lb~ Roughly a intermediate~expert (i think?) I try to ski everything. from moguls to straight shooting downhill, also want to start trying rails/ramps etc. I saw these and was wondering if this is a good choice for a first ski purchase. Otherwise I am kind of lost when it comes to skis, any advice helps! Thanks!
I think there are better choices--the Enforcer 94 is pretty heavy and stiff. I'd take a look at the Line Blade Optic 92 based on your stats and application. Similar in terms of width, but with more of a twin tip shape that helps with jumps, trees, and bumps. Salomon QST 92 is another great choice!
how do you like the unlimited skis compared to the regular 94? I am 54 intermediate to advanced skier and I am on the fence whether to get the unlimited or the regular 94. I like the quick turns and do not necessarily ski that fast these days. Do the unlimited get you easily unbalanced if you are not that precise in turns?
The 94 Unlimited feels more like a touring ski specifically. If you're not skiing very fast, you will likely enjoy it quite a bit. The regular 94 is quite the opposite--strong, sturdy, and stable. If you are a balanced skier, I see no reason why the ski is unbalanced.
Hey bob/Jeff- I’m 6’3 and about 300lbs, do I need the 191 or will I be ok on the 186? I stay on groomers and only ski smaller hills in the east ( Ontario Canada). These would be the skis I would use on choppy/slushy days. I have firebirds for the firm stuff. Great videos, keep it up!
Thanks! I think the 186 is enough. It's an inherently stable and sturdy ski so even in the "shorter" lengths, there's a lot of power here. The 191 is generally reserved for those that are either very tall or just know that they prefer longer skis. Have fun!
You're in the right place! Great ski for mixing conditions and terrain at a very high level of performance. My takeaway on this ski is that it's able to make any shape turn, at any time, in any condition or terrain. Not much else out there that does it like this. Blizzard Bonafide 97 is close, and Volkl Mantra M6 is right there, but the Enforcer is so surprisingly agile for its strength.
The worst part of Enforcers is the graphic. I have a set of these and also a set of Black Crows Atris, and on powder days I feel like I'm taking off my Enforcer sweatpants and putting on my Atris tuxedo
@@SkiEssentials yeah, just sort of bland, which is the opposite of how they ski. I have the 2020 black and white Atris and one time someone in the lift line referred to them as "art"
@@SkiEssentials yes... i own the 165 and 172 from last year and have skied them both numerous times in the past year. I'm 5'7" 150 lbs and a very experienced skiier and have a lot more trouble getting the 172 to do what i want due to much higher swing weight. the 165 is just an all around more enjoyable ski for me, much more agile and responsive.
I skied down a bowl and I was on my Enforcer 104 Free and the guy I skied with was on the Enforcer 94s.. It was windblown, mogully, and flat light.. He was faster on and off his edges than I was and he had no problems with the conditions..
Thanks for all the great reviews guys. I have skied Enforcer 94 and 100 for at least 8 years. Great skis. 5'9, 175 lbs, advanced/expert skier and ski patroller. I have loved the shorter lengths 168 (original) and then moved to 172. I have never had a need for longer. I love short to medium turns, venturing into glades, backsides, and powder. Great east and west. I found the 94 little easier since the 100 does get a little heavy at times. These skis are great for everything.
Glad you like them! It is funny that the 94 and the 100 are so similar yet you can ski both, and in different lengths!
As someone who does not live near the mountains, these videos are very much appreciated as I cannot get much information locally!
Thanks! You should move closer to the mountains, too!
Enforcer are amazing skiis in torn up crud, choppy snow, slopes.feels like riding on rails. Skiis i tried this week. Enforcer 94, ranger 94,kore 93. Sender 94, in that order. not sure how enforcer does it. Feels so effortlessl and smooth. Haven't tried völkl Mantra. Staff says its similar but with even more stability. Ranger is great on ice and can be rotated easily. Better for woods and parks. 100kg, 170cm, 168-178 cm skiis tested. Skiing for 40+ years.
Definitely try the Mantra--I find it to be more precise than the Enforcer, but not more stable. I think that 94 is about as versatile and smooth as a ski can possibly get.
Hi, I'm thinking of getting all mountain skis for the first time. I have been skiing my whole life and would classify myself as a relatively good skier. Am 23 years old. My thinking is just that I want a ski that works everywhere, on all kinds of surfaces, if you understand.
First I looked at the Atomic maverick 95 ti, but now got a bit into the Enforcer models. Checked both the 94 and 100 model. Which one would you recommend and what length? I am 186cm tall and weigh 85kg.
Very good video with very good information! :)
I think the mid-90's is the place to be for what you're looking to do. I'd go with the Enforcer 94 as they take the sturdiness to the next level over the Maverick. I'd go with the 186.
@@SkiEssentials Okay, thank you so much for the input. Actually leaning towards Enforcer 94 right now. Thanks again!
Hello! I stumbled across this channel as I am trying to find skis to buy instead of constantly renting. I'm 5'7" 160lb~ Roughly a intermediate~expert (i think?) I try to ski everything. from moguls to straight shooting downhill, also want to start trying rails/ramps etc. I saw these and was wondering if this is a good choice for a first ski purchase. Otherwise I am kind of lost when it comes to skis, any advice helps! Thanks!
I think there are better choices--the Enforcer 94 is pretty heavy and stiff. I'd take a look at the Line Blade Optic 92 based on your stats and application. Similar in terms of width, but with more of a twin tip shape that helps with jumps, trees, and bumps. Salomon QST 92 is another great choice!
@@SkiEssentials Thank you!
how do you like the unlimited skis compared to the regular 94? I am 54 intermediate to advanced skier and I am on the fence whether to get the unlimited or the regular 94. I like the quick turns and do not necessarily ski that fast these days. Do the unlimited get you easily unbalanced if you are not that precise in turns?
The 94 Unlimited feels more like a touring ski specifically. If you're not skiing very fast, you will likely enjoy it quite a bit. The regular 94 is quite the opposite--strong, sturdy, and stable. If you are a balanced skier, I see no reason why the ski is unbalanced.
Having used an ARV96 for the last years i am now considering this ski. ARV in 177cm, therefore Enforcer in 179cm? I am roughly 1,79 and weigh 74kg.
Also, I would use a Shift binding for being able to take small hikes here and there, will be a bit heavy then right?
I think it's okay to size down on the Enforcer 94 since it's a pretty sturdy and stout ski on its own.
Hey bob/Jeff- I’m 6’3 and about 300lbs, do I need the 191 or will I be ok on the 186? I stay on groomers and only ski smaller hills in the east ( Ontario Canada). These would be the skis I would use on choppy/slushy days. I have firebirds for the firm stuff. Great videos, keep it up!
Thanks!
I think the 186 is enough. It's an inherently stable and sturdy ski so even in the "shorter" lengths, there's a lot of power here. The 191 is generally reserved for those that are either very tall or just know that they prefer longer skis. Have fun!
Would these skis be good for busting through crusty snow on not so ideal days? Looking for a stable ski that can charge.
You're in the right place! Great ski for mixing conditions and terrain at a very high level of performance. My takeaway on this ski is that it's able to make any shape turn, at any time, in any condition or terrain. Not much else out there that does it like this. Blizzard Bonafide 97 is close, and Volkl Mantra M6 is right there, but the Enforcer is so surprisingly agile for its strength.
Yes. Enforcer seams to love eating choppy snow. Torn up slopes feels surreal on these skies.
hi dude, could you help me? im 1.78m tall and about 70kg, which one should i get?
I'd lean to the 172. The skis are sturdy so it's okay to go shorter than head high without losing out on performance and stability.
Hi, i have a quick question. Is it possible to go to the jump park from time to time on one of these? Im a bit worried about the weight.
They're pretty heavy and stiff to be used in a jump park format, but not impossible.
@@SkiEssentials okay, would you say that the 94s unlimited are better in this field while still being good on groomers?
@@elcik4143Better but not ideal. They're easier to control in the air, but you are losing a significant advantage on the groomers, especially if firm.
@@SkiEssentialsalright, thanks for help
The worst part of Enforcers is the graphic. I have a set of these and also a set of Black Crows Atris, and on powder days I feel like I'm taking off my Enforcer sweatpants and putting on my Atris tuxedo
I've always felt that the Enforcer graphic was fine--nothing offensive at least! New Atris I am not as fond of.
@@SkiEssentials yeah, just sort of bland, which is the opposite of how they ski. I have the 2020 black and white Atris and one time someone in the lift line referred to them as "art"
They are so heavy and tough to throw around you really need to size down
We just did an on-snow review focusing on length choices in this ski. Did you see it?
ua-cam.com/video/vp-VVEompYQ/v-deo.html
@@SkiEssentials yes... i own the 165 and 172 from last year and have skied them both numerous times in the past year. I'm 5'7" 150 lbs and a very experienced skiier and have a lot more trouble getting the 172 to do what i want due to much higher swing weight. the 165 is just an all around more enjoyable ski for me, much more agile and responsive.