One should distinguish between Modernization and Westernization. If we go so far as to forget who we are as Chinese, it would become very dangerous. With 5,000 years' history and civilizations, we should be proud of ourselves and not bow to western power and aggression.
The Silk Route was killed by steam boats powered with coal. The development of internal combustion engine, highway construction technology and high speed train technology changed the dynamics in transportation and even threaten the viability of short range air transport. Back to steam boats. Boats from Europe has to be refueled and resupplied to reach to the Far East. This shocked the developments in countries along the coast of Africa. When the boats switched to burn oil most of these ports were not so important anymore. Now we see the impact of transport to commerce and life. A lesson from colonial times. A colony has to be rich to buy British goods. That is why Spain and Portugal were so poor(a simple way of saying it). Like Internet, once the network is established what kind of app would be created / invented? Nobody knows. If you must know before you act you are in a centrally controlled economy, a USSR paradigm. When transport infrastructure were established these countries will develop and prospore. They need heavy machineries and knowhow from Europe and, guess what, CHINA. There is no free lunch. British built the first bridge in Constintinople. The second bridge was built by Japan because the British, at the time, did not understand soft loan. The third bridge was built by China. Eventually this bridge will carry the romantic Oriental Express to reach Beijing. Now you know why UK jumped onto the band wagon so quickly that really annoyed USA.
Honestly speaking, do these guys really understand the history of economics??? I really prefer to watch 宋鸿兵 - 鸿观, he speaks with a lot of global history of economics. Who ever controls of the route of world trade (i.e. sea or land), who ever is the King. This can be proven through thousands years of global history. For god sake open your freakin mind to the global history before speaking out.
如果你们三个都看得懂一带一路中国大战略，那美国就不用头痛啦。
现在的制度根本不足以实现伟大复兴，我不知道你们的复兴的标准是什么，就以唐朝当时的影响力为标准，为什么唐朝可以出那么多伟大的诗人文学家，有唐一朝外国人在本国为官者3000人，曾经有波斯人官至宰相，突厥按说是唐朝的敌人，但是李世民的贴身护卫居然是一个突厥人，李世民为什么被尊称天可汗，受各族敬仰，1000年前唐朝的胸怀都不是现在中共能比的，李建成的宠臣魏征可以得到死对头李世民重用，李世民把反对他的人当一面镜子，你能想象习近平重用薄熙来或者他那些死敌的部下？文化的繁荣，首先是制度的开明，就不用奢望中共重用那些反对他的人了，体制内的开明派都被打压，彻底站在人民对立面统治人民，制度落后导致文化不自信，现在的影视剧管制制度就是扼杀创造力的罪魁祸首，韩流日流为什么能入侵，因为我们即把传统文化丢了，又没有新的先进文化创新，中国历史上什么时候崇拜过蛮夷小国，我们都是被思想禁锢的一代，党文化马克思伟光正，这是最扼杀中国人创造力的制度。一党专制必然导致文化遏制，而文化影响才是伟大复兴的根本，回复唐朝在世界的影响力，首先是包容多元，而不是反对思想就是反革命。算了和你说你也不懂，你可能觉得武力强大才是复兴。武力只会让人恐惧，没有一个国家会佩服一个武夫，前苏联武力够强大，蒙元武力也够强大，可是后世最佩服最怀念的朝代肯定不是忽必烈，为什么世界上是唐人街？美国为什么强大，是他的文化制度影响力，对其他国家价值观影响。文化如好莱坞，歌星迈克尔杰克逊，体育明显乔丹科比，等等这些让人崇拜的各行各业的人物在中国为什么没有或者很少？我要说是因为制度，又该被扣上反革命帽子了，很多国家效仿美帝。我们这个文化制度谁会崇拜？犬儒文化，毫无气节，不用和美国比，比比被推翻的民国时期，胡适鲁迅郭沫若蔡元培，等思想家教育家，新中国成立60多年有吗？除了溜须拍马的伪专家还有啥。有骨气的都成了共产党的敌人，出国的出国。算了不谈了，看到国家现在的堕落，痛心。
香港人還以為中國是毛澤東時代的中國？
這是香港人對目前中國的普遍認知和心態？
一坑一路 哈哈～
一帶黃泉路!
karen chan 哈哈～ 了解（共產黨）
唱衰中国对你们有什么好处？
現在2019了，找個人出來告訴我，這是中國自嗨嗎？
中央深思后的政策就是你们3个智慧能解析的？
港元和美元掛鉤，外國大公司才會對香港仍然有少許的信心，正確嗎.?
如果不和美元掛鉤，香港的國際聲譽會否很悲慘呢.?
+hkabc1111 不是港元和美元掛勾才有信心，而是港元以美元作為儲備貨幣才有信心。
我觉得让萧生自己讲效果更好
點解次次蕭遙遊都upload得咁慢架？！
分析師要實用數據說話, 偏向個人政見只會令話題變成個人show.
哈哈哈哈，笑死
两个擦鞋仔撞晒型，唔好比佢地两个一起主持啦，而且佢地好似互相睇对方都唔顺眼，集集两个人都系0互动，对资料又系0补充，换下啲组合啦.
當年港元為何會有聯繫匯率?就是因為97問題令人對港元冇信心，所以才要掛勾讓人覺得你穩定而安心嘛。另外，掛美元是因為它是全世界的主要貿易貨幣，多國都會買賣和作為儲備，因而令到佢的幣值"相對"穩定，因為不是單邊貨幣。
但人民幣就絕對不是，而且並非全流通貨幣，幣值波幅較大，若果好似蕭生所講，當人仔大貶值時，港元就可以另定"釘實"的價位，咁樣就出現政策矛盾，你掛勾外幣就是想穩定港元，但如你可隨時轉換掛勾價，何來穩定?其他國家怎會信你?除非今後香港只與大陸進行貿易，自絕於全球就得。
+Lau So 咁蕭生又吾係錯，釘美元又真係有佢問題， 當美國經濟好而香港相對沒那麽強的時候
One should distinguish between Modernization and Westernization. If we go so far as to forget who we are as Chinese, it would become very dangerous. With 5,000 years' history and civilizations, we should be proud of ourselves and not bow to western power and aggression.
聽3條撚樣尻up,浪費時間
回头看看，我只能笑笑。香港这些所谓精英
不好意思我看了开始那一段就不想看，心想香港这么聪明就不会97跳楼。
請問...一帶一路...這一個詞語是否老土又過時呢.?
The Silk Route was killed by steam boats powered with coal. The development of internal
combustion engine, highway construction technology and high speed train technology changed the dynamics in transportation and even threaten the viability of short range air transport.
Back to steam boats.
Boats from Europe has to be refueled and resupplied to reach to the Far East. This shocked the developments in countries along the coast of Africa. When the boats switched to burn oil most of these ports were not so important anymore. Now we see the impact of transport to commerce and life.
A lesson from colonial times.
A colony has to be rich to buy British goods. That is why Spain and Portugal were so poor(a simple way of saying it). Like Internet, once the network is established what kind of app would be created / invented? Nobody
knows. If you must know before you act you are in a centrally controlled economy, a USSR paradigm. When transport infrastructure were established these countries will develop and prospore. They need heavy machineries and knowhow from Europe and, guess what, CHINA.
There is no free lunch.
British built the first bridge in Constintinople. The second bridge was built by Japan because the British, at the time, did not understand soft loan. The third bridge was built by China. Eventually this bridge will carry the romantic Oriental Express to reach Beijing. Now you know why UK jumped onto the band wagon so quickly that really annoyed USA.
香港的确没什么企业可以参与一带一路这个项目，因为没有重工业，唯一可以做的就是出线。就算真的打通这条铁路，产业空心化的香港也没有什么商品卖给这些贫穷的国家。
+ManCung Joeng 如果乖的话，金融中心，中国可以做两个，香港和上海。英国不也是没有么？还是抢破头来争一下
金融中心的首要条件是没有共产党控制和支配，
Honestly speaking, do these guys really understand the history of economics??? I really prefer to watch 宋鸿兵 - 鸿观, he speaks with a lot of global history of economics. Who ever controls of the route of world trade (i.e. sea or land), who ever is the King. This can be proven through thousands years of global history. For god sake open your freakin mind to the global history before speaking out.
目光如鼠
这三个人就是在自嗨
T.S. X 是日美收買的漢奸，美國把中東攪亂後，又來想把亞太攪亂，他以為其他國家的領導人沒他們三個聰明
T.S. X 是日美收買的漢奸，美國把中東攪亂後，又來想把亞太攪亂，他以為其他國家的領導人沒他們三個聰明
去看看吧，别偏信。亚投行，一带一路对大家都有好处，不是中国的霸权，是对亚欧资源的整合互利，这是多赢的，多赢才有人加入
一带一路太弱智了，拿钱给流氓国家有去无回，亚投行的功能就是扶贫，中国必将被掏空
过了两年看你的回应，我就想笑
兩年過去了，所有人都拉閘放狗
一仆一碌
Jupistar1 I
听不懂！你还不如讲English