Metric Spaces

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
  • In this video we define a metric space.
    - Please note that a portion of this video has been removed due to an error.
    0:00 - Distance function
    4:01 - Metric Space (definition)
    The product links below are Amazon affiliate links. If you buy certain products on Amazon soon after clicking them, I may receive a commission. The price is the same for you, but it does help to support the channel :-)
    The Approximation Theory series is based on the book "Approximation Theory and Methods" by M.J.D. Powell:
    amzn.to/3CXQpQZ
    This video was made using:
    Animation - Apple Keynote
    Editing - DaVinci Resolve
    Mic - Shure SM58 amzn.to/3gNC801
    (with Behringer U-PHORIA UM2 audio interface amzn.to/3cYYLxz)
    Supporting the Channel.
    If you would like to support me in making free mathematics tutorials then you can make a small donation over at
    www.buymeacoffee.com/DrWillWood
    Thank you so much, I hope you find the content useful.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @isxp
    @isxp 3 роки тому +18

    Thank you for a clear explanation and visually appealing graphics. The font, color choice, and animations are all nice to look at. You're helping an ME senior secure his Math minor with these videos

    • @DrWillWood
      @DrWillWood  3 роки тому +3

      Thanks so much! Good luck with the numerical methods class (One of my favourite topics and very difficult but so useful!).

  • @user-wi1rj4iw9y
    @user-wi1rj4iw9y Рік тому +3

    Brief and clear! Thank you. 谢谢。

  • @t.ganesh1692
    @t.ganesh1692 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent video! Thank you Will!

  • @TronSAHeroXYZ
    @TronSAHeroXYZ 2 роки тому +1

    Subbed because you talk about stuff I like.

  • @stipepavic843
    @stipepavic843 2 роки тому

    subbed instantly, great videos!!!

  • @ibmalik84
    @ibmalik84 Рік тому

    your channel is really helpful!!

  • @5Stars49
    @5Stars49 5 місяців тому +1

    Lovely explanation 😮

  • @MT.632
    @MT.632 Рік тому

    Excellent video!!🌸

  • @edgbaston149
    @edgbaston149 Рік тому

    Thank you so much
    You're amazing 👏💗

  • @choukriadan4706
    @choukriadan4706 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the explanation Dr.will . But this units of so much though

  • @JordanWeitz
    @JordanWeitz 2 роки тому +6

    Hrm. at 9:07 Will seems to claim a < b ==> |a| < |b|. It is true in this case, but he doesn't explain why.

    • @FreeAsInFreeBeer
      @FreeAsInFreeBeer 2 роки тому +9

      Yes, this argument is not correct. (counter example: -3 < 2, but |-3| > |2|)
      An easy way to prove it is like this.
      These inequalities hold by definition:
      -|a| ≤ a ≤ |a|
      -|b| ≤ b ≤ |b|
      Add the inequalities together:
      -(|a| + |b|) ≤ a + b ≤ |a| + |b|
      We solve by cases:
      If a+b not negative, then: a + b = |a + b|, and so a + b = |a + b| ≤ |a| + |b|.
      If a+b negative, then a + b = -|a + b|, and so -(|a| + |b|) ≤ a + b = -|a + b|, multiplying with -1 gives: |a + b| ≤ |a| + |b|.
      So in both cases it is true that: |a + b| ≤ |a| + |b|.
      Now, let a = x-y, b = y-z.
      |x-y + y-z| ≤ |x-y| + |y-z|
      |x-z| ≤ |x-y| + |y-z|
      Done!

    • @zapzya
      @zapzya 2 роки тому

      This is true if 0

  • @mcgrewgs
    @mcgrewgs 2 роки тому +6

    At around 2:10, that arrow could be bidirectional, right, since the two statements must be equivalent? I.e.
    d(x,y)=0 x=y
    If it weren't bidirectional, I could define, for example, d(x,y)=1 for all x,y and that would fulfill all the requirements.

    • @einstien311
      @einstien311 2 роки тому

      Correct, the impilcation there should be bidirectional. If the distance between two elements is zero, then the two elements must be the same. Conversely, if two elements are the same element, the distance between the element and itself must be zero.
      If you are trying to prove some proposed function is a distance function, then you have to show forward implication and the backward implication.
      Interestingly, there is a distance function called the "discrete metric" (I think) that is defined as d(x,y)=0 if x=y, and d(x,y)=1 if x≠y. Essentially, the discrete metric just is a toggle that indicates whether the inputs are the same or different.

    • @edgarbonet1
      @edgarbonet1 2 роки тому

      Indeed. As written, d(x, y) = 1+|x−y| would be a distance over ℝ, which is wrong.

  • @alminaahmed_2552
    @alminaahmed_2552 3 роки тому

    It's ❤

  • @hasibulhaque9452
    @hasibulhaque9452 3 роки тому +2

    Would you please suggest any book for learning metric space more.

    • @DrWillWood
      @DrWillWood  3 роки тому +1

      Hi! I used Introduction to Topology by Bert Mendelson (Dover Books) for preparing this video which has a chapter on metric spaces and is a nice book in general. I've also heard positive things about Metric Spaces: iteration and application by Victor Bryant but I haven't actually looked at that book myself!

  • @Atistatic
    @Atistatic 11 місяців тому

    Dr. Wood i would like to ask if anyone who want understand metric spaces, knowning well multi variable calculus is a prerequisite??

    • @DrWillWood
      @DrWillWood  11 місяців тому +1

      I don't think so! Knowing the basics of set theory is enough to get started

  • @user-vg7zv5us5r
    @user-vg7zv5us5r Рік тому

    More rigorous vectors sans direction parameter.

  • @zetacrucis681
    @zetacrucis681 2 роки тому +1

    8:53 This step is invalid. You can't just take absolute values of both sides of an inequality, e.g.:
    -2 < 1 does not imply |-2| < |1|, i.e., 2 < 1.

    • @josephcampbell4877
      @josephcampbell4877 2 роки тому

      He explains in the video that it's valid since the right hand side of the equation is non-negative

    • @bartomiejpotaman6973
      @bartomiejpotaman6973 2 роки тому

      @@josephcampbell4877 the problem is that we don’t know the sign of the left side, zeta crucis is right about that one

  • @tombouie
    @tombouie 2 роки тому +2

    Thks, ?????but what is the clear difference between a metric vs normed space????
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_space vs en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normed_vector_space

    • @DrWillWood
      @DrWillWood  2 роки тому +5

      Hi! A normed linear space (NLS) IS a metric space but the definition but made a little bit more specific to vector space. Its the property (3.) d(x,y) = d(y,x) that is changed. i.e. the distance is same in either direction. for NLS, if we reverse the direction of a vector X we multiply by -1. By property 3 of a NLS we have ||-1X|| = |-1| ||X|| = ||X|| and so its the same with NLS that direction doesn't matter. But we also want that intuitive property of vectors built in that 2 times a vector should by twice as long and so on so that's we why have ||aX|| = |a| ||X|| for constant a in general. The way I think about it is more simple: that a NLS is a metric space that happens to also be a vector space!

    • @tombouie
      @tombouie 2 роки тому +1

      @@DrWillWood Ooooooh, thks-yous ever so much.

    • @Joffrerap
      @Joffrerap 2 роки тому

      distance has 2 inputs and norm only has 1 so that's one big difference already.