@jerjr49 that was in the south tower in the sky lobby. the plane did not crash in the sky lobby. there were small fires in the sky lobby, but the inferno was in the 81st floor.
@dclason Temperature is irrelevant. Steel was not a factor, due to the fact that it is shown that the core of the building survived...( shown in the video at 1:20.) Also, if really was a factor, steel doesn't have to be melted to be compromised... Back in WWII, solders weren't allowed to boil coffee in their steel helmets because it would warp and distort the metal.... Last I checked, Jet fuel is a bit hotter than wood fires....
I like this video. I'm so glad to see that I'm not the only sane person who believes the truth, and not listening to those conspiracy theories. Unfortunately, we're the monority.
Only one problem with that theory. Nothing present would burn @1800*F under those conditions. Not to mention that IF it even could, it would melt the aluminum above it, not below it. Heat does rise.
One of the best 9-11 debunking videos I've ever seen. What's sad is that you have to spood feed information like this to AMERICANS to prove that when you slam a commercial liner into a building at 500 miles an hour, it will fall... PS. I would like to ammend my statment to dclason- the core didn't survive indefinately. Just thought I'd make that clear, because I know people like you would pick up on how I phrased that right off the bat...
hello im am a steel worker also. i would like to point out to you that it isnt always the case that the slag will blow inside. there are so many facters in this unles you are present u dont know. lack of oxy presure can cuase the slag to not push through, steel too thick for size of "tip". the angle you are cutting at. to much heat (acetlylene) for steel thinckness i can go on and on. at 4.22 that is a thermal lance cut, very comon on large demolition jobs quick and can punch through thick steel
1000%, are you sure? a single plane impact that damaged multiple load bearing collums and truss systems. and lets not forget the fires that helped weaken the steel. this is how a truss system looks.../\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\.... very light weight and very strong but with one huge problem. if you take out just one of the " / " in the system it cant even hold its own wieght, that helps explain why the towers came down. once the 1st floor came down there was no stopping it.
Thousands of explosives?? How does that work? Teams of trained explosives experts were on scene at all 3 building collapses. Nobody found a SINGLE ITEM relating to a CD. Explosives don't blow cement floors 4 inches thick in to powder. Massive amounts of constant, grinding weight do this. And there was more than enough of that present.
even if the law is correct you arnt takeing into account indervidual strengths and weaknesses throughout the structure (ie: a plane takeing out a couple of floors and fires weakening steel.).
So what? This wasn't a camp fire, it was a diffuse burn of office materials pouring black/dark grey smoke. Black/dark grey smoke equals incomplete combustion, which in turn equals low burn temp. Why didn't the facade melt off if it was burning so hot?
tell me why they should have toppled. the design of the building was the reason it came down on its own footprint. and to add to that that it was also the buildings design that led to its demise. never trust a "truss".
at 10:06 you say "not a single column has been cut through" but those outer "columns" you speak of are just thin outer skin. not structural members of the building, right?
Laurie B weight of 35 stories falling into a 10 story impact zone that weakened the trusses and core supports. The perimeter columns were unbraced and provided little resistance
The amount of energy that would have been needed to move that top portion in any side wards motion would have been way more than any structural failure could provide
Why the hell then is the official story - 'Jet Fuel Burning melted / weakened the Structure & that explains the delay in collapse' & when did it become 'no molten Steel, only Aluminium' Why did they Collapse after such a lengthy delay then ?
If you like black comedy via Dunning-Kruger, then this topic is the one. Truthers declare both their unfitness to vote in a democracy and the total lack of the bare essentials for existence in a technological society. If they were ever to be in any way significant this society would disappear faster than Rome.
nope. not true. it leaned to the south during the collapse because that's where the damage and the fires were. free fall speed from 7 wtc is 6 seconds. it took 9 seconds to collapse.
If the aluminum u speak of was the plane then why were there reports of molten steel for weeks during the cleanup! Works boots we melting and there is footage of molten steel!
okay so it was not 9 seconds - that is arbitrary though. \just look at all the other evidence! Those towers would not have come down unless explosives destroyed the core.
Why many peaople talk about ''complot'' any person can be do this.I have see a many video where the person say that the buildings are built for resist to a plane crash.But my opinion is,that any person have test this with a real plane and real building.any person can procide the reaction of tower during a real situation.So stop talk a complot. R.I.P to thousands of people died ps:sorry for my english,I don't speak very well english.
>"This video doesn't address any of the real important points." What a coincidenece, your comment failed to point out any of the "so-called" important points that should have been addressed.
"they" didnt use anything. tell me how they got these explosives into the building and strapped them to collums or bolts on every single one of the 110 floors. dont forget there are thousends of people working there.
fuck yeah, tuesday specials are the best, i love shopping. oh but i could live like a miserable truther and sit on the net and read u bunch of bullshit theories and lies. livin the american dream
@jerjr49 that was in the south tower in the sky lobby. the plane did not crash in the sky lobby. there were small fires in the sky lobby, but the inferno was in the 81st floor.
oh and i believe the lateral ejections were cuased by the perimeter collums breaking apart as they flayed out.
@dclason Temperature is irrelevant. Steel was not a factor, due to the fact that it is shown that the core of the building survived...( shown in the video at 1:20.) Also, if really was a factor, steel doesn't have to be melted to be compromised... Back in WWII, solders weren't allowed to boil coffee in their steel helmets because it would warp and distort the metal.... Last I checked, Jet fuel is a bit hotter than wood fires....
I like this video. I'm so glad to see that I'm not the only sane person who believes the truth, and not listening to those conspiracy theories. Unfortunately, we're the monority.
Only one problem with that theory. Nothing present would burn @1800*F under those conditions.
Not to mention that IF it even could, it would melt the aluminum above it, not below it. Heat does rise.
One of the best 9-11 debunking videos I've ever seen. What's sad is that you have to spood feed information like this to AMERICANS to prove that when you slam a commercial liner into a building at 500 miles an hour, it will fall... PS. I would like to ammend my statment to dclason- the core didn't survive indefinately. Just thought I'd make that clear, because I know people like you would pick up on how I phrased that right off the bat...
the fear in his eyes at 2:24 really hurts to see... those poor fuckin guys man.....
Common sense seems to be lost on this subject! Its baffles the mind just how ignorant people are when it comes down to the laws of physics,
How 3 building collapsed in the exact same manner. Caused by 2 planes. Yet it takes years of training to do that with explosives
hello im am a steel worker also. i would like to point out to you that it isnt always the case that the slag will blow inside. there are so many facters in this unles you are present u dont know. lack of oxy presure can cuase the slag to not push through, steel too thick for size of "tip". the angle you are cutting at. to much heat (acetlylene) for steel thinckness i can go on and on. at 4.22 that is a thermal lance cut, very comon on large demolition jobs quick and can punch through thick steel
1000%, are you sure? a single plane impact that damaged multiple load bearing collums and truss systems. and lets not forget the fires that helped weaken the steel. this is how a truss system looks.../\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\.... very light weight and very strong but with one huge problem. if you take out just one of the " / " in the system it cant even hold its own wieght, that helps explain why the towers came down. once the 1st floor came down there was no stopping it.
Thousands of explosives??
How does that work? Teams of trained explosives experts were on scene at all 3 building collapses. Nobody found a SINGLE ITEM relating to a CD.
Explosives don't blow cement floors 4 inches thick in to powder. Massive amounts of constant, grinding weight do this. And there was more than enough of that present.
even if the law is correct you arnt takeing into account indervidual strengths and weaknesses throughout the structure (ie: a plane takeing out a couple of floors and fires weakening steel.).
So what? This wasn't a camp fire, it was a diffuse burn of office materials pouring black/dark grey smoke. Black/dark grey smoke equals incomplete combustion, which in turn equals low burn temp.
Why didn't the facade melt off if it was burning so hot?
tell me why they should have toppled. the design of the building was the reason it came down on its own footprint. and to add to that that it was also the buildings design that led to its demise. never trust a "truss".
He had an aluminum color code according to how hot it was.
at 10:06 you say "not a single column has been cut through" but those outer "columns" you speak of are just thin outer skin. not structural members of the building, right?
@FreddyClapton there was no crash in the city of Pittsburgh
Lol clearly this guy is not a "zombie". He seeked the truth and discovered what he shows in this video.
Buckling in the corner yet it imploded into its own footprint? Please explain
Laurie B weight of 35 stories falling into a 10 story impact zone that weakened the trusses and core supports. The perimeter columns were unbraced and provided little resistance
The amount of energy that would have been needed to move that top portion in any side wards motion would have been way more than any structural failure could provide
So, you admit that it fell in 9.22 seconds? That's too fast to account for RESISTANCE.
Why the hell then is the official story - 'Jet Fuel Burning melted / weakened the Structure & that explains the delay in collapse' & when did it become 'no molten Steel, only Aluminium' Why did they Collapse after such a lengthy delay then ?
If you like black comedy via Dunning-Kruger, then this topic is the one.
Truthers declare both their unfitness to vote in a democracy and the total lack of the bare essentials for existence in a technological society.
If they were ever to be in any way significant this society would disappear faster than Rome.
@FreddyClapton what did Pittsburgh have to do with it?
why are there so many unanswered questions
You can melt aluminum in a camp fire...
nope. not true. it leaned to the south during the collapse because that's where the damage and the fires were. free fall speed from 7 wtc is 6 seconds. it took 9 seconds to collapse.
seems like every body is a structural engineer these days!!
If the aluminum u speak of was the plane then why were there reports of molten steel for weeks during the cleanup! Works boots we melting and there is footage of molten steel!
What part don't you understand?
Well, as usual the real truth isn't PC enough for the public, so I have no reason to discuss it on this page.
okay so it was not 9 seconds - that is arbitrary though. \just look at all the other evidence! Those towers would not have come down unless explosives destroyed the core.
metal conducts heat up or down. you really need to go back to school and pay more attention this time!
Why many peaople talk about ''complot'' any person can be do this.I have see a many video where the person say that the buildings are built for resist to a plane crash.But my opinion is,that any person have test this with a real plane and real building.any person can procide the reaction of tower during a real situation.So stop talk a complot. R.I.P to thousands of people died
ps:sorry for my english,I don't speak very well english.
Metal and concrete don't just vaporize
>"This video doesn't address any of the real important points."
What a coincidenece, your comment failed to point out any of the "so-called" important points that should have been addressed.
At 2:35 you can hear explosions.
oh and they waited 11 years to detonate them. please be realalistic.
lol rosie.. i love that little guy
ur right it's not jellow......... :S
I hope you got more than 30 shekels for your soul...
This video doesn't address any of the real important points. Not impressive or compelling at all.
we got him dead
yeah funny that
"they" didnt use anything. tell me how they got these explosives into the building and strapped them to collums or bolts on every single one of the 110 floors. dont forget there are thousends of people working there.
fuck yeah, tuesday specials are the best, i love shopping. oh but i could live like a miserable truther and sit on the net and read u bunch of bullshit theories and lies. livin the american dream
THANK YOU for so effectively showing how ridiculous all these conspiracy Loony-Toons really are.