The only thing I didn't cover in this review is desktop use. The bottom line is that these speakers are decent in that application, but I believe your ears need to be at least a few feet away from the front of the speakers in order for the sound to integrate well together. My suggestion would be to look into buying an LS3/5a-type speaker if you're in the market for a killer desktop solution.
I've wanted to use the Harbeth P3ESR in that application for a long while. But their price, plus that of amp, DAC, and cabling, makes it all unaffordable. Still, it would be my first choice.
I use the LS50 Wireless 2 meta speakers on the desktop. I sit 3+ feet away. It sits on Iso accoustic stand and I calibrate it using Dirac live. In my situation I have tried many speakers and these are the best by miles.
Sean, you just keep getting better and better. I think you don't give yourself enough credit. Your reviews are top notch. Thank you for the review. Can't wait to see what's next. Well done sir, bravo!
I've owned KEF LS50 Metas since Jan 2021, and have been catching up with the zillion you tube reviews of them. I've never heard of you, but your well-spoken analysis is well above other you tube reviewers I've endured. My Metas get used interchangeably with compact floorstanders (Thiel CS2.4) to appease a hypersensitive neighbor, as the KEFs lack the bottom two octaves and lack the ability to play loud in my fairly large space. I have basically infinite amp power and long-term high-end components I know well. Your comment about the upper midrange being 'thin' thus enhancing imaging got my attention as that's their primary deficit -- for me. My Thiels and headphones are totally flat through the entire midrange. The KEF 'thinness' is a broad 2-3dB dip from 2-3.5kHz, shown on nearly every response plot of them, including KEF's own. Regardless of any perceived imaging enhancement, it's a FAR greater tonality deficit as it alters the character of many vocals for the worse, reduces the snap of snares, the bite of horns, the sheen of strings. In short, this wide dip sucks the life and presence out of music. This had to be a conscious choice on the part of KEF as their other speakers lack this dip, and it could have been easily equalized with the crossover or their mastery of tweaking their uni-q driver. After decades of being used to a flat midrange, I find this enough of a flaw to park the KEFs in favor of the Thiels whenever I can, despite their notable sonic advantages in other areas. BTW, simple math shows the radiating area of the woofer to be the equivalent of a 'conventional' 3.5" woofer. All the more amazing they can produce the bass and volumes they do! Otherwise, a very well-aware review. I'll be looking at your other reviews over time.
Sean, this was a clear, highly detailed and accurate review with some added smoothness to the presentation. Great analysis and I'm sure the comparisons will help many people looking for context vs the "LS35A sound." Solid review.
Loved hearing your thoughts. I took the plunge on the LS50 Wireless 2s. Had them for a week now. Let’s put it this way. My wife who hated my big floor standing Polks LSi705s LOVES these. stayed up late Saturday night with me listening to old Unplugged live performances until 1:00 AM. If speakers get my wife in on a 1:00 am listen session they are doing something right. Now if I can just sneak a REL t7i into the budget I will be done with my hifi purchase for some time.
Sean, you've just become my benchmark for a most credible, non-bs audio reviewer out there. Coming from a guy who follows the art for over 30years. Hats off to you. Some old guys should learn from you. Respect.
Seen a dozen of reviews about the Meta’s but this is by far the most recognizable and honest review on UA-cam. And I have the Meta’s, the LS3/5A and had the LS50’s for many years. The Meta’s are the holy grail if you are on a budget (hook em on a cheap NAD amp) with a small to medium size listening room.
I paired LS50 Wireless II with the new KEF Kc62 subwoofer and holy smokes. I’m speechless. The resolution and neutrality of the sounds is awesome and the sub added nice bass extension and blended perfectly with the speakers. They also yielded a bigger soundstage. Plus, I got a sweet 2.1 home theater system from the same combo.
Good to see you reviewing again, it's been a while. Caught some of the podcasts which were all great but didn't stay uploaded too long, so I missed a few. Take care and thanks, fantastic review again.
Love the new little touches in the production. And the original product comparisons. Makes us watch the video even if we're not that interested in the reviewed product.
I saw this come up and thought, "Yeah, yeah, yeah...another friggin' LS 50 Meta review... *yawnnnnnnn* . . ." Sean, your review put everyone else's to shame. I wasn't even remotely interested in these speakers until I watched your review. Loads of useful information.
Sean, great to see you back "in the groove" enjoying reviews. Very interesting comparison with the Dynaudios and the Falcons. (Great little music interludes in your review; you should list what you are playing! very cool jazz tunes there!!) ....and please, Don't take yourself or anyone watching your channel too seriously. keep enjoying what you do. simple as that. awesome informative review! thank you much!
haven’t heard the new version of the LS50’s; haven’t heard any Kef speakers I like since the early 80’s. I replaced the Buchardt S400’s with the Falcon Acoustic LS35A. The Falcon’s are not as bass heavy but I like them a whole lot more. The tone of the Falcon’s is addictive. I remember going to my favorite stereo store in the mid 70’s and really wanting a pair of Chartwell LS35A’s, but they cost $460 and I just couldn’t buy them. Turned out they could have been the only thing I’ve ever purchased that is now worth more than I paid. I get a lot of good info from your videos and hope you continue with your videos.
I've had a pair of the charcoal black Metas for a couple months. I use them for my desktop PC audio (near field) and am very pleased. My other components are: Avantone Pro CLA-200 amp, Topping D90, SVS SB-2000. It all adds up to quite a nice set up for games, music, and streaming video. Very solid, comprehensive review! Well done, mate!!
Great review. You are among the best. Just received mine today. LOVE THEM. This review helped with the post purchase questions. I actually need a new water heater, but needed the KEFs first. Keep up the great reviews.
Amazing review. The best ever you made. It is a human review that do you stick on specs and audiophile terms, but show how a great speaker can fit, or not, on some personal tastes. Congrats
I wish you would also do nearfield observations and comparisons. Nice work and good to see KEF is listening to you and voicing their speakers to your preferences.
You may have betrayed us, R3 owners, by liking the Meta more than the R3, but remember Sean, it was the R3 you took your hat off for :) Thanks for the good work.
@M Pi Haha. I do not worry and I don't mind not having the best and greatest as long as I enjoy what I have. Funny I see the same about my other hobby (photography) and how people split the hair between the body/lens that has just come out and what they own, instead of going out and shooting :o)
i think the hi-fi is becoming another empty consumist market, were every year will be new products that are almost identical the the last version but with subtle "improvements" that justify the need to purchase the new product
Mega OT. Who is the typical audiophile. 1. Mostly male. 2. Mostly middle age or aged. 3.His musical interest goes beyond one genre. 4. Insatiable curiosity about hi fi components. 5.His best speaker his the next one. 6 Dedicates at least one hour of pure musical listening daily. 7.He's happy with background music while doing other things. 9. While watching movies pays a lot of attention to the sound effects and considers a real torture having no other option but incorporated TV speakers. 10. His audiophile's best friend rig sounds better even though it is cheaper then his. Did I forget anything. Open for suggestions
For what its worth. I've owned the a lot of the Kef line up: Q350, LS50, R3, R5, R7 and the LS50 Meta. Before I got the LS50 meta, the R3's were hands down best of the line up. I took a break from KEF for several years and went with stuff such as Klipsch Forte, Harbeth, Magnepan, Martin Logan and own a pair of Acoustic Zen Adagio. I picked up a pair of LS50 Metas a bit ago with zero interest of owning another pair of LS50's. The only reason i did was because i traded a piece of gear and got them as part of the trade. As someone who does NOT agree with most of the UA-cam audio content creators, Sean's perspective has been probably the most transparent and realistic. I can say with much experience the LS50 Meta truly is a significant and true upgrade over the LS50. The original LS50 used sensational ear candy such as a sparkling top end, directional sound stage with good off axis performance and larger than expected bass for the package. All of those elements are ideal to swing a buyer doing a demo or looking for something nicer than a pair of $800 speakers. These elements for a more seasoned HiFi just interfere with the music when you know what to listen for. The LS50 Meta on the other hand did not have those characteristics. That stupid 'HiFi' sparkle sound on the top end was gone. The dynamics were improved and a sense of life was brought into the speaker. It still doesn't have the body, texture, rhythm/pace or soul that I personal prefer in my sound. However, for its price point, it's very good! It's very friendly as it plays nicely with lots of gear and music types. Most importantly! It's now a more honest speaker that present the music for what it is rather than the unpleasant aftertaste found in the original LS50 when they applied the house 'KEF signature sound'.
I have had them for a week now and they are brilliant. With Iotavx SA3+PA3 and SVS SB1000 subwoofer. The soundstage, detail, and natural timbre are stunning. I now know what words like transparency and holographic soundstage mean. It's not harsh, it's neutral. it's stunning. the build is world-class. Looks have a high WAF factor as well. (Wife acceptance factor)
Zero Fidelity: Perfecting the art of the audio review concentrate :-) This is one of your reviews I liked a lot , particularly your speaker selections for comparisons. For me, the original LS50 demonstrates better than many audio product how radically different perception of sound can be between humans. They are like those photos on the internet of dresses that different people see in different colors that are not even close. I hated them whenever I listened to them, even on youtube, where crappy microphones and shoddy recording technique still could not hide their painful (to my ears) sound signature that I could never settle into. On a side note, can we please have more live sessions with friendly timing to international time zones?
I loved seeing your video review of these! I just picked up a pair to demo with my Mcintosh MA5200 and I have to say, I love what they bring to the table. With music across the board (from classical to EDM) the speakers just just make you want to groove! I am using a Klipsch SPL subwoofer and honestly, it paired very well and showed how great these speakers were not only with music, but movies too. For their asking price, they are well worth it.
Stellar review!! When I auditioned the Metas the standout for me, was their mind blowing ability to utterly disappear. Imaging beyond belief and like none I ever heard, in that regard. Almost kept the Metas but the Triangle Esprit Comete EZ ultimately beat them out when A/Bing them. Triangle Comete EZ had superior bass performance and overall oomph over the Meta and the Tonality was to absolute DIE FOR on the Triangle! Instruments just sounded so real in comparison and it was simply a more fun and exciting experience with the Triangle. Otherwise, The New LS50 Metas are a remarkable speaker for all the reasons Sean mentioned in this wonderful review! 👍🏼
This is the best review you’ve ever done. Of course, it is exactly what I need to hear as I am in the market for a $1500 smaller speaker. I’ve never connected to KEF either. But I’m moving to Japan and I have to put together a system for a small apartment that keeps me satisfied for at least a few years. Ive been leaning towards a Naim Uniti Atom with an affordable speaker and you hit on two likely speaker suspects. I’m a professional doublebassist so sound matters a lot to me. I also can’t take cds or vinyl with me across the world so a streamer seems a good fit. I also tend to listen at lower volumes, maybe 75-80db tops so I need something I can hear and feel at my typical listening levels. Add that I like to hear my recording mixes on a good system with somewhat monitor consistency. The other direction is to swap out the Naim with a used luxman (I mean, japan!) and piece together something. Perhaps I’d get a nice British speaker later, or go the Klipsch route. But this review gave me a ton of confidence in my general inclinations. I think of you as being a bit more objective than some of your fine audio reviewing friends, which can be a buzzkill at times, ha, but when making a clear decision is exactly what a buyer needs. Thanks a million for this review.
Sean I fully agree with your LS50 Meta review/comments. They sound warm but at the same time transparent and a little forward. The tweeter is exceptionally detailed but at the same time not harsh and fatiguing. Previously I had Triangle Borea BR03s. I got them after your review and paired them with Rega IO amplifier and they sounded great. Now I got the Metas and paired them with Hegel H95 and they also sound fantastic. I liked the br03s midrange forwardness but I like the LS50 Meta's smooth detailed top end and their larger sound stage.
Love the "Video Stage" of your stuff. Brings in visions of someone sneaking into a brick and mortar Audio Store storage room and secretly testing gear.
Bought a pair of Metas. I was very impressed with them at the store. At home I am still tweaking things but I can say I am enjoying them. Noted the smallness more at home and added a T7i which changed them significantly. Despite all the hype, the fact that Sean never looked at them bothered me a little bit. It is reassuring to me that he seems to hear what I do in the Metas. I am running them with a Moon Ace integrated but I am curious now to hear them with more power. Thanks Sean for the excellent review
My MANNNNN, Sean . I have been waiting for this. First, love the new setting. The light, background, etc... Second, I didn't like the first LS50 but I will get an audition of LS50 Meta because of your review. Thanks.
Hey Sean, excellent review! I wanted to love the LS50 but they were too bright for me. (fatiguing) I auditioned the Metas recently and fell in love with them. I'm probably going to go with the Wireless 2 version and can't wait to pull the trigger.
When it comes to 2-way bookshelves Coaxial drivers are uniquely superior in prioritizing the right compromises. Difficult to design but when you get it right? Think Genelec The Ones or these LS50 Metas or at a larger scale - KEF Blade
I used the Meta's for 2 months and loved the sound. Even the bass is very good allthough you miss the lower part. Some music leave you with a gap and some is perfect. Nou I added a Rel subwoofer and I couldn't be happier. I came from Infinity Kappa 90, a big tower.
@@20puskinas1992 I really love this combo. I don't miss anything. Sometimes the sub gives too much low. That's the only difference I see between the Infinity's and this combo. Sometimes I feel the recording of the music is lacking. Nothing 'we' the listeners can do about! I can recommend this combo. At least try them before buying anything. There is a lot to buy. I am very satisfied now. And my wife is very happy with the much smaller speakers!
This was going to be my setup as well but I went wireless 2 so save a grand on the M5si plus a streamer. Now I can’t decide... 1 t7i or 2 t5i...hmm. I’m in love with the wireless 2s. All in one solution, clean look, amazing sound
Wow. Excellent review. After much A B testing I much prefer my Dynaudios over the Metas. I appreciate what the metas do but I couldn’t relax with them.
Try the Metas with a good tube amp and a decent SW (I'm using a REL T5i). If properly tuned and positioned in your room, it is heaven. Any unlikely improvement would cost me several times the price of this combo.
@@pablobanados4282How powerful is the tube amp you use to drive the LS50 Meta? I just ordered a pair for $999.99 and plan to use them for desktop use monitoring the live recordings I make replacing a well-loved pair of B&W 302’s (about $300 or $350/pr in 1999). I have a choice of amps: I pair of Heathkit UA-2 EL84 monoblocks @ 12 WPC I recently totally (everything except the transformers and chassis) rebuilt, an awesome Sony all-discrete (not one IC) STR-7045 receiver from 1973 I just finished refurbishing @ 45 WPC and a real sleeper; a Kyocera R-461 mosfet receiver @ 50 WPC, 120 W short term into 2 ohms, that still looks, works and measures as new. Thanks for reading and Merry Christmas!
🤩 wow, what an outstanding review. As a dealer I’ve heard hundreds of speakers, and reps wax poetically about such and such a brand, but your clear descriptions and honest feedback is priceless. Ordered myself a set to demo and compare, but I have a feeling I’ll probably be keeping them 😉
Hi Sean, I love my totem model 1’s. From your experience with the last totem speaker you reviewed, to your ears, which had the better tone. I know they are probably totally different sounding though. Thanks again for an awesome review!!!
The Sky's can sound amazing and every bit as good (and in many respects better) than the Metas, but you'll be working pretty hard at finding the right gear and the right position within your room to make that happen. Because of how particular the Sky's can be, its hard to say which one has better tone. Since it's been 3-4 years since I last had the Sky's in my home, all I can really do is say that the Meta will likely be a safer bet. Especially since many of their retailers offer some kind of a return policy.
I took your suggestion about the Polk Audio T50s, and after two years of use my ears were curious to hear better treble extension and midrange... When I heard the metas at Hifi Buys in Atlanta, I couldn't leave without them! Now I need a Rel sub and my audio journey will be complete a long time 🙂
It's funny how I always thought the same about KEF speakers (and I still own three of them to date, a pair of iq30s that I liked a lot better then their successors the q300, and a center speaker in the same series). But never got emotional with them. Same with the original ls50s (unamplified, and not the meta, never heard those). Wasn't quite impressed by the r700 but the best I ever auditioned were the R300 - to my ears and to my taste. I read that the latest, R11 etc are amazing, i'd like to audition them once that COVID pita is over... so glad you've reviewed these and liked them, it's a 'must audition' now 😉!
I'd say most reviewers have a history and preference which informs their view with a particular brand. Some come across as uncomfortable when it's a brand sound they don't typically relate to. Well...not this review! Your whole approach was so comfortable and well balanced. Congrats. My only question would be about the accompanying purchase of the matching stands. They are a significant chunk of the purchase price here in the UK, and it would be nice to know if the investment is worth it.
I bought mine just before Christmas (to replace my KEF Q100), running them with my IOTAVX SA3, and my inexpensive ELAC Debut S10.2 sub... love the performance!
This is quite a Transformation / Revelation Sean! In addition to the Meta damper they moved the XO freq and put the tweeters in phase with the bass-mid. Most reviews say it's a SUBTLE change. I'd love to compare... Hope the health issues are under control;-)
Thanks Carlito. I sorta understand why others have perceived the differences as subtle. It's still an LS50 after all. Perhaps I hear them far more clearly because I listen in an intimate, well-treated room that makes it SUPER easy to pick up on darn near anything.
@@ZeroFidelity yeah, I guess you're super sensitive to the XO region. I use Mu-Fi amps and J-fet pre that are warm and smooth, so I'm doing fine with my late model Black edition LS50s and REL subs. I was interested in the LS3/5a comparison. It was the starting point for KEFs development team and white paper. Glad they pulled off an improvement with 45 years of driver and cabinet development behind them! Be well ☮️
Tremendously informative - and enlightening on the system matching question. So much rubbish on the internet ; but this review really helped and I now intend to audition a pair.
@@pkdude5334 I like both of those channels as well... to each their own. Having said that I am glad to see Sean up his game. His perspective, personality and knowledge deserve him far more subscribers. Hopefully polishing the videos up a bit will get him there.
Have the 3/5a and the LS50 anniversary. Just bought the Meta’s. The Meta’s are the best in the segment, better than ls3/5a and better than the anniversary version. Much better.
I am using these speakers with Luxman 505uxii and love the sound, very large imaging and great detail which is what I like so they are good for me. Thank you for the review.
Between the Metas and the Dynaudios, I guess I will kee them both. I would get the Meta's out when I have beer company. The Evokes when I have wine company.
Most certainly they will utilize this tech in other models eventually... but considering they just finished revamping the entire line up in recent years and the LS50 meta was the last to be completed/introduced, it could be years before they decide to introduce an upgraded R series Meta and I doubt the Q series will ever get it... The blade series surely will start to be made utilizing the new meta tech being that its a top of the line flagship model. Gotta remember that the LS50/LS50 meta is a Kef flagship model alongside the Muron and Blade series, the Q series and R series although both being extremely great products, neither is classified or marketed as being among Kef's flagship models, they're considered the regular product line, whereas the LS50/50 meta are flagship models hence why the LS50 meta got the additional R&D of the meta technology. but I'll go a step further to say Kef may even license the Meta technology to other brands since now that the cats out of the bag about the significant improvements a little meta technology can make, im sure other companies are inquiring about licensing the patented technology for use in their own products... either Kef will license the technology out or there will be a bunch of knock off meta technology products developed by other companies, either way I suspect meta technology will become a industry standard used by many companies in the near future.
Interesting you find the metas that different from the original ones. Relying only on the memory, I more agree with Ron at New Record Day, they sound very similar to the old LS50s just a little bit rounded. I find the R3 much more superior to both (again only relying on memory) For sure I do not mean any disrespect. Thanks for the review.
Your spot on with the ls3/5a, i have the original chartwells and they got alotta magic in the midrange thats tough to beat with anything, owning the original ls50 for 6 months ill say i do love both, the ls50 has more heft in bass, but something in the ls3/5a in the midrange is really addicting and hard to replicate, so id have a tough choice between the 2 id believe, but ive given the win the the ls3/5a for critical listening, but for all around use and modern music maybe the ls50 is more capable, i love both.
Yeah, bought the original Rogers LS3/5a's (15 ohm) in 1978 and paired them with a Hafler DH200 and a Rappaport Pre 2. What they did well, primarily vocal and especially female vocals, they did without peer even, I think to this day. Still remember the goosebumps from listening to Joni Mitchell, Linda Ronstadt, and Stevie Nicks. The Metas are my regular driver today and are paired with an SB 2000 sub and eq'd with Dirac Live 3. No comparison, the Metas win hands down--more neutral tonality, huge soundstage, even better imaging, better dynamic range, and no mid bass blump that makes mating with a sub nearly impossible. Much the better speaker, with plenty of magic in its own right. But still, even today the LS3/5 a's bring back very fond memories of my initial dive into high end audio.
I really liked the Kef Q350s, but hated the Metas. To me they sound too forward and sterile. It was a confusing moment, but an important one. I suppose my preferences for hifi at times really run counter to popular reviewers. I ended up with Revel Performa3 M106s, which you don’t hear a lot about.
Great review especially detailed comparison to LS35A and previous 50’s and why those weren’t for you. I didn’t know all those details about the 35a’s and appreciate the history lesson😀The new metas will make for a great reference speaker but personally I’m passing on them and will look for something more high end.
Great review Sean 👍. I actually run these and the Mofi ls3/5a in an A/B office setup. Amp is Creek evo100a. SVS sb1000 sub. I use Mofi for desktop nearfield and they do have a richer vocal presentation, which I love on acoustic country/folk music. There is some magic in there, that must be what you mean by "tone" :) Metas are mounted higher at standing level on shelf (1/2 port plugs) for room projection/dancing in my small room. The Metas are awesome all-arounders. The Meta tweeter can give off a bit of a metallic tinge on certain recordings, which I don't love. They do provide pleasingly strong mid bass, and I can really crank them up from time to time with relatively minimal distortion.
The only thing I didn't cover in this review is desktop use. The bottom line is that these speakers are decent in that application, but I believe your ears need to be at least a few feet away from the front of the speakers in order for the sound to integrate well together. My suggestion would be to look into buying an LS3/5a-type speaker if you're in the market for a killer desktop solution.
thanks very much, I have SA LS3/5A ,Yamaha RN803D and Rel T5/I for my desktop and I got phenomenal sound, thanks to your review as well
I've wanted to use the Harbeth P3ESR in that application for a long while. But their price, plus that of amp, DAC, and cabling, makes it all unaffordable. Still, it would be my first choice.
@@ropr5898 check my set up for tot 2000 dlls, I am sure you can switch amp if needed
Please review a couple of GR-Research speakers
I use the LS50 Wireless 2 meta speakers on the desktop. I sit 3+ feet away. It sits on Iso accoustic stand and I calibrate it using Dirac live. In my situation I have tried many speakers and these are the best by miles.
A few years old now but this is hands down the best review of the LS50 Metas I've watched.
The setup section was really useful.
These with their new sub would make a badass and beautiful speaker set. A master class in industrial design.
Sean, you just keep getting better and better. I think you don't give yourself enough credit. Your reviews are top notch. Thank you for the review. Can't wait to see what's next. Well done sir, bravo!
Supper efficient review, not a single second wasted. The accuracy of sound description is still the best on youtube.
I've owned KEF LS50 Metas since Jan 2021, and have been catching up with the zillion you tube reviews of them. I've never heard of you, but your well-spoken analysis is well above other you tube reviewers I've endured. My Metas get used interchangeably with compact floorstanders (Thiel CS2.4) to appease a hypersensitive neighbor, as the KEFs lack the bottom two octaves and lack the ability to play loud in my fairly large space. I have basically infinite amp power and long-term high-end components I know well.
Your comment about the upper midrange being 'thin' thus enhancing imaging got my attention as that's their primary deficit -- for me. My Thiels and headphones are totally flat through the entire midrange. The KEF 'thinness' is a broad 2-3dB dip from 2-3.5kHz, shown on nearly every response plot of them, including KEF's own. Regardless of any perceived imaging enhancement, it's a FAR greater tonality deficit as it alters the character of many vocals for the worse, reduces the snap of snares, the bite of horns, the sheen of strings. In short, this wide dip sucks the life and presence out of music. This had to be a conscious choice on the part of KEF as their other speakers lack this dip, and it could have been easily equalized with the crossover or their mastery of tweaking their uni-q driver. After decades of being used to a flat midrange, I find this enough of a flaw to park the KEFs in favor of the Thiels whenever I can, despite their notable sonic advantages in other areas.
BTW, simple math shows the radiating area of the woofer to be the equivalent of a 'conventional' 3.5" woofer. All the more amazing they can produce the bass and volumes they do!
Otherwise, a very well-aware review. I'll be looking at your other reviews over time.
Sean, this was a clear, highly detailed and accurate review with some added smoothness to the presentation. Great analysis and I'm sure the comparisons will help many people looking for context vs the "LS35A sound." Solid review.
Loved hearing your thoughts. I took the plunge on the LS50 Wireless 2s. Had them for a week now. Let’s put it this way. My wife who hated my big floor standing Polks LSi705s LOVES these. stayed up late Saturday night with me listening to old Unplugged live performances until 1:00 AM. If speakers get my wife in on a 1:00 am listen session they are doing something right.
Now if I can just sneak a REL t7i into the budget I will be done with my hifi purchase for some time.
This is one of the most informative and enjoyable reviews I’ve heard on UA-cam, excellent work.
Sean, you've just become my benchmark for a most credible, non-bs audio reviewer out there. Coming from a guy who follows the art for over 30years. Hats off to you. Some old guys should learn from you. Respect.
Seen a dozen of reviews about the Meta’s but this is by far the most recognizable and honest review on UA-cam. And I have the Meta’s, the LS3/5A and had the LS50’s for many years. The Meta’s are the holy grail if you are on a budget (hook em on a cheap NAD amp) with a small to medium size listening room.
I've just got these and zero regrets. They are incredible.
Gratz!
I paired LS50 Wireless II with the new KEF Kc62 subwoofer and holy smokes. I’m speechless. The resolution and neutrality of the sounds is awesome and the sub added nice bass extension and blended perfectly with the speakers. They also yielded a bigger soundstage. Plus, I got a sweet 2.1 home theater system from the same combo.
Great Combo!
My KC62 is arriving tomorrow 😍
Wireless degradate the sound vs cables?
What amp are you driving the speakers with?
@@mikiegood since he is using the Wireless version, they include internal amplification.
I got the LS50 Metas and think they are amazing the sound quality is fantastic.
Good to see you reviewing again, it's been a while. Caught some of the podcasts which were all great but didn't stay uploaded too long, so I missed a few. Take care and thanks, fantastic review again.
Those live streams have a very short lifespan. Glad you could be a part of them!
I think this may be my favorite review that you’ve done. Bravo!
And I’m not even in the market for anything like this speaker.
Love the new little touches in the production. And the original product comparisons. Makes us watch the video even if we're not that interested in the reviewed product.
I saw this come up and thought, "Yeah, yeah, yeah...another friggin' LS 50 Meta review... *yawnnnnnnn* . . ." Sean, your review put everyone else's to shame. I wasn't even remotely interested in these speakers until I watched your review. Loads of useful information.
Sean, great to see you back "in the groove" enjoying reviews. Very interesting comparison with the Dynaudios and the Falcons. (Great little music interludes in your review; you should list what you are playing! very cool jazz tunes there!!)
....and please, Don't take yourself or anyone watching your channel too seriously. keep enjoying what you do. simple as that. awesome informative review! thank you much!
The review I've been waiting for... thanks very much Sean!
maybe not the first, for understandable reasons, but surely the best review of the LS50 meta 👌
haven’t heard the new version of the LS50’s; haven’t heard any Kef speakers I like since the early 80’s. I replaced the Buchardt S400’s with the Falcon Acoustic LS35A. The Falcon’s are not as bass heavy but I like them a whole lot more. The tone of the Falcon’s is addictive. I remember going to my favorite stereo store in the mid 70’s and really wanting a pair of Chartwell LS35A’s, but they cost $460 and I just couldn’t buy them. Turned out they could have been the only thing I’ve ever purchased that is now worth more than I paid. I get a lot of good info from your videos and hope you continue with your videos.
Your Best Ever review, you nailed the beginning and the 'End!' Such a well rounded review 🤙😊
I've had a pair of the charcoal black Metas for a couple months. I use them for my desktop PC audio (near field) and am very pleased. My other components are: Avantone Pro CLA-200 amp, Topping D90, SVS SB-2000. It all adds up to quite a nice set up for games, music, and streaming video. Very solid, comprehensive review! Well done, mate!!
Great review. You are among the best.
Just received mine today. LOVE THEM. This review helped with the post purchase questions. I actually need a new water heater, but needed the KEFs first. Keep up the great reviews.
Amazing review. The best ever you made. It is a human review that do you stick on specs and audiophile terms, but show how a great speaker can fit, or not, on some personal tastes. Congrats
Looks Great. Keep it up Sean. I really appreciate the work that was put in to the video.
Owned the originals twice and could never warm up to them,but I LOVE the Meta's.
That LS/5a comparison is going to surprise a few people.
I wish you would also do nearfield observations and comparisons.
Nice work and good to see KEF is listening to you and voicing their speakers to your preferences.
There's only so much ground I can reasonably cover in a video. I put a stickied comment to address desktop use.
Great review Sean this was fun to watch! Glad to see the channel get back to speaker reviews.
You may have betrayed us, R3 owners, by liking the Meta more than the R3, but remember Sean, it was the R3 you took your hat off for :)
Thanks for the good work.
@M Pi Haha. I do not worry and I don't mind not having the best and greatest as long as I enjoy what I have.
Funny I see the same about my other hobby (photography) and how people split the hair between the body/lens that has just come out and what they own, instead of going out and shooting :o)
i think the hi-fi is becoming another empty consumist market, were every year will be new products that are almost identical the the last version but with subtle "improvements" that justify the need to purchase the new product
Mega OT. Who is the typical audiophile. 1. Mostly male. 2. Mostly middle age or aged. 3.His musical interest goes beyond one genre. 4. Insatiable curiosity about hi fi components. 5.His best speaker his the next one. 6 Dedicates at least one hour of pure musical listening daily. 7.He's happy with background music while doing other things. 9. While watching movies pays a lot of attention to the sound effects and considers a real torture having no other option but incorporated TV speakers. 10. His audiophile's best friend rig sounds better even though it is cheaper then his. Did I forget anything. Open for suggestions
For what its worth. I've owned the a lot of the Kef line up: Q350, LS50, R3, R5, R7 and the LS50 Meta. Before I got the LS50 meta, the R3's were hands down best of the line up. I took a break from KEF for several years and went with stuff such as Klipsch Forte, Harbeth, Magnepan, Martin Logan and own a pair of Acoustic Zen Adagio. I picked up a pair of LS50 Metas a bit ago with zero interest of owning another pair of LS50's. The only reason i did was because i traded a piece of gear and got them as part of the trade. As someone who does NOT agree with most of the UA-cam audio content creators, Sean's perspective has been probably the most transparent and realistic. I can say with much experience the LS50 Meta truly is a significant and true upgrade over the LS50. The original LS50 used sensational ear candy such as a sparkling top end, directional sound stage with good off axis performance and larger than expected bass for the package. All of those elements are ideal to swing a buyer doing a demo or looking for something nicer than a pair of $800 speakers. These elements for a more seasoned HiFi just interfere with the music when you know what to listen for. The LS50 Meta on the other hand did not have those characteristics. That stupid 'HiFi' sparkle sound on the top end was gone. The dynamics were improved and a sense of life was brought into the speaker. It still doesn't have the body, texture, rhythm/pace or soul that I personal prefer in my sound. However, for its price point, it's very good! It's very friendly as it plays nicely with lots of gear and music types. Most importantly! It's now a more honest speaker that present the music for what it is rather than the unpleasant aftertaste found in the original LS50 when they applied the house 'KEF signature sound'.
I have had them for a week now and they are brilliant. With Iotavx SA3+PA3 and SVS SB1000 subwoofer. The soundstage, detail, and natural timbre are stunning. I now know what words like transparency and holographic soundstage mean. It's not harsh, it's neutral. it's stunning. the build is world-class. Looks have a high WAF factor as well. (Wife acceptance factor)
Zero Fidelity: Perfecting the art of the audio review concentrate :-) This is one of your reviews I liked a lot , particularly your speaker selections for comparisons. For me, the original LS50 demonstrates better than many audio product how radically different perception of sound can be between humans. They are like those photos on the internet of dresses that different people see in different colors that are not even close. I hated them whenever I listened to them, even on youtube, where crappy microphones and shoddy recording technique still could not hide their painful (to my ears) sound signature that I could never settle into.
On a side note, can we please have more live sessions with friendly timing to international time zones?
I loved seeing your video review of these! I just picked up a pair to demo with my Mcintosh MA5200 and I have to say, I love what they bring to the table.
With music across the board (from classical to EDM) the speakers just just make you want to groove! I am using a Klipsch SPL subwoofer and honestly, it paired very well and showed how great these speakers were not only with music, but movies too. For their asking price, they are well worth it.
Stellar review!! When I auditioned the Metas the standout for me, was their mind blowing ability to utterly disappear. Imaging beyond belief and like none I ever heard, in that regard. Almost kept the Metas but the Triangle Esprit Comete EZ ultimately beat them out when A/Bing them. Triangle Comete EZ had superior bass performance and overall oomph over the Meta and the Tonality was to absolute DIE FOR on the Triangle! Instruments just sounded so real in comparison and it was simply a more fun and exciting experience with the Triangle. Otherwise, The New LS50 Metas are a remarkable speaker for all the reasons Sean mentioned in this wonderful review! 👍🏼
This is the best review you’ve ever done. Of course, it is exactly what I need to hear as I am in the market for a $1500 smaller speaker. I’ve never connected to KEF either. But I’m moving to Japan and I have to put together a system for a small apartment that keeps me satisfied for at least a few years. Ive been leaning towards a Naim Uniti Atom with an affordable speaker and you hit on two likely speaker suspects. I’m a professional doublebassist so sound matters a lot to me. I also can’t take cds or vinyl with me across the world so a streamer seems a good fit. I also tend to listen at lower volumes, maybe 75-80db tops so I need something I can hear and feel at my typical listening levels. Add that I like to hear my recording mixes on a good system with somewhat monitor consistency. The other direction is to swap out the Naim with a used luxman (I mean, japan!) and piece together something. Perhaps I’d get a nice British speaker later, or go the Klipsch route. But this review gave me a ton of confidence in my general inclinations. I think of you as being a bit more objective than some of your fine audio reviewing friends, which can be a buzzkill at times, ha, but when making a clear decision is exactly what a buyer needs. Thanks a million for this review.
Sean I fully agree with your LS50 Meta review/comments. They sound warm but at the same time transparent and a little forward. The tweeter is exceptionally detailed but at the same time not harsh and fatiguing. Previously I had Triangle Borea BR03s. I got them after your review and paired them with Rega IO amplifier and they sounded great. Now I got the Metas and paired them with Hegel H95 and they also sound fantastic. I liked the br03s midrange forwardness but I like the LS50 Meta's smooth detailed top end and their larger sound stage.
Love the "Video Stage" of your stuff. Brings in visions of someone sneaking into a brick and mortar Audio Store storage room and secretly testing gear.
Bought a pair of Metas. I was very impressed with them at the store. At home I am still tweaking things but I can say I am enjoying them. Noted the smallness more at home and added a T7i which changed them significantly.
Despite all the hype, the fact that Sean never looked at them bothered me a little bit. It is reassuring to me that he seems to hear what I do in the Metas. I am running them with a Moon Ace integrated but I am curious now to hear them with more power. Thanks Sean for the excellent review
My MANNNNN, Sean . I have been waiting for this.
First, love the new setting. The light, background, etc...
Second, I didn't like the first LS50 but I will get an audition of LS50 Meta because of your review. Thanks.
Hey Sean, excellent review! I wanted to love the LS50 but they were too bright for me. (fatiguing) I auditioned the Metas recently and fell in love with them. I'm probably going to go with the Wireless 2 version and can't wait to pull the trigger.
Nice visual presentation of products used for comparison.
Thanks!
Very enjoyable and easy to understand review. If this is a taste of things to come on this channel I'm really looking forward to more. Keep em coming!
When it comes to 2-way bookshelves Coaxial drivers are uniquely superior in prioritizing the right compromises. Difficult to design but when you get it right? Think Genelec The Ones or these LS50 Metas or at a larger scale - KEF Blade
Fantastic review. Well done!
I have the LS50 WII and completely agree with your analysis of these speakers.
you got my subscription directly with the Accuphase in the background. This man seems to know what he talks about
I used the Meta's for 2 months and loved the sound. Even the bass is very good allthough you miss the lower part. Some music leave you with a gap and some is perfect. Nou I added a Rel subwoofer and I couldn't be happier. I came from Infinity Kappa 90, a big tower.
Do you miss anything from a tower? How is a midrange?
@@20puskinas1992 I really love this combo. I don't miss anything. Sometimes the sub gives too much low. That's the only difference I see between the Infinity's and this combo. Sometimes I feel the recording of the music is lacking. Nothing 'we' the listeners can do about! I can recommend this combo. At least try them before buying anything. There is a lot to buy. I am very satisfied now. And my wife is very happy with the much smaller speakers!
I've read in several posts that these speakers 1) are really for nearfield listening and 2) require lots of amplifier power. Thanks for addressing.
Great review as always. Thank you, Sean.
Thanks for watching!
Probably one of your best reviews. Summed it up perfectly and in a non-polarizing way. Keep it up brutha!
Good to hear from you again! Very good review.
I can't wait to hear your review of the KEF KC62's.
2nd this!
me 3
I can see my new system now, Musical Fidelity m5si, LS50 Meta`s, and two REL t5`s.... AHHHHHHH
Even better sub is the new KF62.
This was going to be my setup as well but I went wireless 2 so save a grand on the M5si plus a streamer. Now I can’t decide... 1 t7i or 2 t5i...hmm. I’m in love with the wireless 2s. All in one solution, clean look, amazing sound
@@aaronfriedman8201 I was having the same dilemma and ending up going for 2 T5i’s with my LS50’s. They sound superb together.
Wow. Excellent review. After much A B testing I much prefer my Dynaudios over the Metas. I appreciate what the metas do but I couldn’t relax with them.
Try the Metas with a good tube amp and a decent SW (I'm using a REL T5i). If properly tuned and positioned in your room, it is heaven. Any unlikely improvement would cost me several times the price of this combo.
Unless you use big floorstanders then you gonna need sub anyway.
@@pablobanados4282How powerful is the tube amp you use to drive the LS50 Meta? I just ordered a pair for $999.99 and plan to use them for desktop use monitoring the live recordings I make replacing a well-loved pair of B&W 302’s (about $300 or $350/pr in 1999). I have a choice of amps: I pair of Heathkit
UA-2 EL84 monoblocks @ 12 WPC I recently totally (everything except the transformers and chassis) rebuilt, an awesome Sony all-discrete (not one IC) STR-7045 receiver from 1973 I just finished refurbishing @ 45 WPC and a real sleeper; a Kyocera R-461 mosfet receiver @ 50 WPC, 120 W short term into 2 ohms, that still looks, works and measures as new. Thanks for reading and Merry Christmas!
Just pulled the trigger and bought these speakers replaceing klipsch m500s
🤩 wow, what an outstanding review. As a dealer I’ve heard hundreds of speakers, and reps wax poetically about such and such a brand, but your clear descriptions and honest feedback is priceless. Ordered myself a set to demo and compare, but I have a feeling I’ll probably be keeping them 😉
A very pragmatic and non-hyperbolic review. very credible.
Thank you for this review. I like your new approach 👍
Hi Sean, I love my totem model 1’s. From your experience with the last totem speaker you reviewed, to your ears, which had the better tone. I know they are probably totally different sounding though. Thanks again for an awesome review!!!
@M Pi Thank you for your feedback, true that on price.
The Sky's can sound amazing and every bit as good (and in many respects better) than the Metas, but you'll be working pretty hard at finding the right gear and the right position within your room to make that happen. Because of how particular the Sky's can be, its hard to say which one has better tone. Since it's been 3-4 years since I last had the Sky's in my home, all I can really do is say that the Meta will likely be a safer bet. Especially since many of their retailers offer some kind of a return policy.
Thank you for your thoughts and reply!
Hi Sean. The LS50 Metas really come alive if you have sound absorbent panels behind the speakers and the side walls .
I took your suggestion about the Polk Audio T50s, and after two years of use my ears were curious to hear better treble extension and midrange... When I heard the metas at Hifi Buys in Atlanta, I couldn't leave without them!
Now I need a Rel sub and my audio journey will be complete a long time 🙂
It's funny how I always thought the same about KEF speakers (and I still own three of them to date, a pair of iq30s that I liked a lot better then their successors the q300, and a center speaker in the same series). But never got emotional with them. Same with the original ls50s (unamplified, and not the meta, never heard those). Wasn't quite impressed by the r700 but the best I ever auditioned were the R300 - to my ears and to my taste. I read that the latest, R11 etc are amazing, i'd like to audition them once that COVID pita is over... so glad you've reviewed these and liked them, it's a 'must audition' now 😉!
I'd say most reviewers have a history and preference which informs their view with a particular brand. Some come across as uncomfortable when it's a brand sound they don't typically relate to.
Well...not this review! Your whole approach was so comfortable and well balanced. Congrats.
My only question would be about the accompanying purchase of the matching stands. They are a significant chunk of the purchase price here in the UK, and it would be nice to know if the investment is worth it.
I’m going to purchase the Solid Steel SS6 stands for my KEF LS50 Meta speaker.
Great review, well balanced and informative! Thanks.
I bought mine just before Christmas (to replace my KEF Q100), running them with my IOTAVX SA3, and my inexpensive ELAC Debut S10.2 sub... love the performance!
The SA3/Meta combo was the first one I started out on. Yep. Real good value! Enjoy!
This is quite a Transformation / Revelation Sean!
In addition to the Meta damper they moved the XO freq and put the tweeters in phase with the bass-mid.
Most reviews say it's a SUBTLE change. I'd love to compare...
Hope the health issues are under control;-)
Thanks Carlito. I sorta understand why others have perceived the differences as subtle. It's still an LS50 after all. Perhaps I hear them far more clearly because I listen in an intimate, well-treated room that makes it SUPER easy to pick up on darn near anything.
@@ZeroFidelity yeah, I guess you're super sensitive to the XO region.
I use Mu-Fi amps and J-fet pre that are warm and smooth, so I'm doing fine with my late model Black edition LS50s and REL subs.
I was interested in the LS3/5a comparison. It was the starting point for KEFs development team and white paper. Glad they pulled off an improvement with 45 years of driver and cabinet development behind them!
Be well
☮️
Tremendously informative - and enlightening on the system matching question. So much rubbish on the internet ; but this review really helped and I now intend to audition a pair.
Hmm, i just order a pair of SVS Ultra. Bookshelf's. Great review..like always..
I got SVS pb1000 I LOVE IT!
Those will not disappoint
First video filmed with the new camera? It almost looks like there is production value here! :D
@@pkdude5334 that's why I would prefer the cheap audio man's production
@@pkdude5334 I like both of those channels as well... to each their own. Having said that I am glad to see Sean up his game. His perspective, personality and knowledge deserve him far more subscribers. Hopefully polishing the videos up a bit will get him there.
Great informative review , been thinking about getting these for awhile
Another superb review Sean 👍
Nice honest review! Thank you!
Great review Sean. 🤘
Have the 3/5a and the LS50 anniversary. Just bought the Meta’s. The Meta’s are the best in the segment, better than ls3/5a and better than the anniversary version. Much better.
I am using these speakers with Luxman 505uxii and love the sound, very large imaging and great detail which is what I like so they are good for me.
Thank you for the review.
Great Review! Thanks for all your efforts
Between the Metas and the Dynaudios, I guess I will kee them both. I would get the Meta's out when I have beer company. The Evokes when I have wine company.
I’d love to know how they sound with tubes!! 🤗
Wonder if Kef will start using meta technology in their other speakers? Another great review Sean.
Most certainly they will utilize this tech in other models eventually... but considering they just finished revamping the entire line up in recent years and the LS50 meta was the last to be completed/introduced, it could be years before they decide to introduce an upgraded R series Meta and I doubt the Q series will ever get it... The blade series surely will start to be made utilizing the new meta tech being that its a top of the line flagship model.
Gotta remember that the LS50/LS50 meta is a Kef flagship model alongside the Muron and Blade series, the Q series and R series although both being extremely great products, neither is classified or marketed as being among Kef's flagship models, they're considered the regular product line, whereas the LS50/50 meta are flagship models hence why the LS50 meta got the additional R&D of the meta technology.
but I'll go a step further to say Kef may even license the Meta technology to other brands since now that the cats out of the bag about the significant improvements a little meta technology can make, im sure other companies are inquiring about licensing the patented technology for use in their own products... either Kef will license the technology out or there will be a bunch of knock off meta technology products developed by other companies, either way I suspect meta technology will become a industry standard used by many companies in the near future.
New camera? The picture and lighting looks great.
Please review the Quad S-2 speakers and compare them to the KEF LS50 Meta.
Nice job. How could they not be state of the art with that cabinet and driver is all I can think?
Interesting you find the metas that different from the original ones.
Relying only on the memory, I more agree with Ron at New Record Day, they sound very similar to the old LS50s just a little bit rounded. I find the R3 much more superior to both (again only relying on memory)
For sure I do not mean any disrespect. Thanks for the review.
Your spot on with the ls3/5a, i have the original chartwells and they got alotta magic in the midrange thats tough to beat with anything, owning the original ls50 for 6 months ill say i do love both, the ls50 has more heft in bass, but something in the ls3/5a in the midrange is really addicting and hard to replicate, so id have a tough choice between the 2 id believe, but ive given the win the the ls3/5a for critical listening, but for all around use and modern music maybe the ls50 is more capable, i love both.
Excellent review. I've been wondering about these little guys for some time now. I've got to check them out.
Plz make a comparison video between ls50 meta and buchardt s400
Awesome review, thanks Sean!
Outstanding review!
Yeah, bought the original Rogers LS3/5a's (15 ohm) in 1978 and paired them with a Hafler DH200 and a Rappaport Pre 2. What they did well, primarily vocal and especially female vocals, they did without peer even, I think to this day. Still remember the goosebumps from listening to Joni Mitchell, Linda Ronstadt, and Stevie Nicks.
The Metas are my regular driver today and are paired with an SB 2000 sub and eq'd with Dirac Live 3. No comparison, the Metas win hands down--more neutral tonality, huge soundstage, even better imaging, better dynamic range, and no mid bass blump that makes mating with a sub nearly impossible. Much the better speaker, with plenty of magic in its own right.
But still, even today the LS3/5 a's bring back very fond memories of my initial dive into high end audio.
I really liked the Kef Q350s, but hated the Metas. To me they sound too forward and sterile. It was a confusing moment, but an important one. I suppose my preferences for hifi at times really run counter to popular reviewers. I ended up with Revel Performa3 M106s, which you don’t hear a lot about.
Q150 and a sealed Sub did the trick for me. I like them over the LS50 and Q350. Still wondering how the Metas would compare.
@@selassie123GA That’s interesting. I had the Q150 first and really liked them. They’re what made me realize how much I had been missing.
Before you send them back (if you are going to) it would be very interesting to hear a review with the matching KC62 subwoofer.
Great review especially detailed comparison to LS35A and previous 50’s and why those weren’t for you. I didn’t know all those details about the 35a’s and appreciate the history lesson😀The new metas will make for a great reference speaker but personally I’m passing on them and will look for something more high end.
Thank you much much for this review Sean, I hope I got your name correctly.
Great review Sean 👍. I actually run these and the Mofi ls3/5a in an A/B office setup. Amp is Creek evo100a. SVS sb1000 sub.
I use Mofi for desktop nearfield and they do have a richer vocal presentation, which I love on acoustic country/folk music. There is some magic in there, that must be what you mean by "tone" :)
Metas are mounted higher at standing level on shelf (1/2 port plugs) for room projection/dancing in my small room. The Metas are awesome all-arounders. The Meta tweeter can give off a bit of a metallic tinge on certain recordings, which I don't love. They do provide pleasingly strong mid bass, and I can really crank them up from time to time with relatively minimal distortion.
Thanx very insightful !! Hope your reflux is doing better ( avoid coffee ) By the way, the Cap suits you well !! Good Review ! Bill from France
I love Kef Speakers
I own a pair of the cheaper Q100 and damn they sound so sooooo clear and smooth.
I use them as my 2ch system
I just used NoRez in my Q-100s and ohh my they weigh a couple pounds more now !