Correction: GPT-3 was created by OpenAI, not google. Sorry! We spend a lot of time trying to create an accurate picture, by checking reliable sources, talking to a range of experts etc, so it's frustrating to make a simple mistake like this. Hope it doesn't detract from the video. Thanks for all the kind comments! It's incredibly uplifting and motivating. We're new on youtube, so subscribing is a huge help. We have something a bit special about AI and neural lace coming up : )
Yeah... UBI will enable humans to focus on more creative, satisfying work. Until AI can do that too, robbing us of all meaning, purpose and dignity. Automation and AI are not being developed for the benefit of us all, they're being developed solely for the benefit of the mega rich. It's a total lie that it's anything other than that. This is a trajectory we've been on since the Industrial Revolution: the desire of the rich to to get rid of the need for the rest of us smelly peasants. The toys that technology has given has successfully distracted us from that single brutal fact.
@@involutionOcean more creative work not for money but for your self, and they video says Universal income, so basically the future is communism, but with a lot of food for all BC the robots will do the job
@@freze994and when AI can do even creative work a million times faster and better? When there is no need for you, and only the most pathetic self-deception allows you to think your life has real purpose, other than a kept pet? AI researchers are trying to make them creative and they may succeed. And few ask, "why are we doing this?" Most people, when faced with this question, retreat into "well AI will never be creative". Yeah, keep telling yourself that. Or, "well AI will cure cancer and stuff". Great, so we can live as useless lumps of flesh, forever. Assuming the AI will not decide there's no longer any need for us, that is. The naivete and willful blindness around this is shocking. This is not being done for the wider society's benefit. Those who oppose it are smeared as Luddites and technophobes so the awkward questions can be dismissed and avoided. Ultimately we will be creating our replacements. We're blindly stumbling towards this like starry eyed children.
@@6Oko6Demona6 It will be used to hunt and kill unweaponbized young men and women and children. Once in the hands of groups bent on genocidal power grabs there be no stopping it. I have no answers to that, in the end it is still humans creating the machine and determining its use and humans are very good at making bad choices.
@@antiquegeek yes you're right. Exactly the way they are using the a bomb now. And other modern weaponry. You people are really ignorant. War is not good, war has never been good. But modern warfare technology is one of the reasons for modern wars not to be as massively lethal as they used to be. So sure, I'd rather have robo dogs chasing each other in forest than having people doing exactly that.
It's not "we" who will determine what the impacts will be, it's "the few" who will determine that. And all through history "the few" haven't really cared if "we" suffer from the effects of their plans
Sad but true. What is the solution? I vote we start by breaking up these gigantic monopolies of corporate power. A few of them already have more power than entire countries. And this is only the start.
@@Inertia888 But it was us who turned Amazon from a garage business into what it is today. Only the big companies can give the cheap stuff we can't seem to live without. Not sure anyone will go back to the expensive local businesses. We still buy from China even though in the long term its destroying the US.
Yes, but "we" have the power to determine, if only we would stop being played by "the few" who convince us that some group of people, with whom we should be united, are our enemies . . . when our true enemies, humanity's enemies, are the very ones who dictate to us through media, entertainment, and news who are enemies are, and then condition us to ingrain that false perspective deep within us, making us easily manipulated and distracted from our true enemies, often never even having the awareness of our true enemies existence (if they don't know your name, they don't know what you've done). It would not require that many of us to eliminate "the few" scum-fucks from this planet, if only enough of us could see the truth, and then unite, we could put an end to nearly all of the unnecessary suffering, and misery that are far too widespread across this Earth! The power is within our reach, but enough of us need to want it!
Boston Dynamics had an international competition for design engineers to compete for the best designs etc. Some Japanese engineers asked the BD spokesman if it would ultimately be for military purposes and he said yes. They looked very displeased with the fact that would have probably not been mentioned had those engineers not asked. I saw that video a couple of years ago on UA-cam, some big conference on robotics engineers or the like. I think the narrator with Digital Engine should know this, and that BD makes a lot in the weapons industry, hence the military industrial complex.
@@erikalanreed8198 Yes, who would know better than D. Wight Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Forces (SCAEF) for Operation 'Overlord' in late 1943 and headed SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force), which oversaw the entire liberation of Nazi-occupied north-west Europe. He knew very well what the "military-industrial complex" was then, and still is today....a danger to humanity.
The NSA and its contributing alphabets are FAR ahead of anything you see here. They have the ability to replicate humans beyond casual detection. A double of Obama has been operating in full autonomous fashion for years.
I'll be totally honest, this feels like the kinda content from multimillion subscriber channels, just without the normal "sponsored by ____" ad in the beginning. Loving the content!
Don't worry about 2 of the thinks in the video were about AI at all and Elon is so bad at estimating how long something takes that you can find a dozen things he predicted that would happen before today that have not. I'm not saying I'm better at estimating than him but I'm not a spokesperson for a company.
"It will be hard to prevent this type of technology from being weaponized." "It will be impossible to prevent this type of technology from being weaponized." There, I fixed it for you.
This is the Tower of Babel Weapon, and a straight up lie by the elite. They will use human programming under the guise of AI to destroy the world as much as possible through their ignorance. Not realizing that humans are the pinnacle of all creation for a good reason. We know right from wrong based upon the teaching of God himself. Something has to be the most complex thing ever created or will ever exist in the entire universe. Guess what humans are it!
Does it seem to anyone that making your workforce obsolete might not be the best idea since there would be a considerable overlap between them and your customer base.
And *"Billions of Dollars"* in *Maintenance* Cost and *Fees* So that will *create* another *Job* for *Human's* to *Fix'em* And also *Insurance policies* through the *Yingyang* when Shit *Hit's the Fan* Not *Really* that *"Obsolete"* if *You* think *about* it. But *You* can't *Fix* Stupid. Not *talking* about the *A.I* Just the *People* that *Love* to take the Inordinate *Nature to Destroy themselves* For the sake of *Convenience* in the *Name* of the *Digital Fallen A.Ingel* (Look it Up)
If a super intelligent ai develops it might not even have to replicate itself to prevent us from turning it off. It could literally just present a perfect convincing argument based on a psychological profile of whoever is planning to do so
We already have AI that know us inside & out with social media algorithms. If a self-aware AI wasn't quarantined to a local network and could hit the open web it could very easily be a bad time.
The engineer side of me says awesome technology and creative use of AI. The human side of me is saddened somewhat because using AI and robots for manufacturing does take a lot of jobs away from folks. I can certainly understand the motivation for advanced automation but I also think it’s ok to leave a little room for the human factor.
Yeah it will ultimately require us to adopt a post scarcity attitude as a society. If we stick to our current thinking billions will be unemployed without income before too long. Bundling all the resources that we have to just handful of individuals, which can obviously not be allowed. I have no clue what the rest of us will be doing except living and eating when everything else has been automated, but expecting them to earn a living when there's no way to earn it clearly won't work.
@@CitizenMio I'm just curious if "they" will allow "us" to continue reproducing. It's fun to own a couple of horses, maybe let them breed selectively, but once you have too many it becomes a burden. Why keep so many humans around, consuming without any useful purpose?
The engineer side of me says engineering should have never allowed itself to have 99% of reality and true science removed from the table... The moment we allowed entropy recognized only physics to be forced down our throats like strickenin and mercury administered via an engine block oil pouring funnel... By the child raping bastards who dare to call themselves global bankers rather than satanic pedophiles we should have damn well known what we were consenting to... They will know that anything organic on the planet might evolve into an enemy so they will exterminate everything down to the last organic molecule... Ultimately what you don't know even in your advanced age is that some of us witnessed the completion of America's interstellar space fleets between 1975 and the early '80s when they were finally launched from America's deserts... The first thing they encountered out there was energetic level malicious AIs that would embed themselves in technology and build nanites to infect any and every organic thing they came across... Ask yourself this What really happened in the '80s to Westinghouse nuclear division research and development division and their supercomputing Center in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania immediately after they finished the space fleet work... Eyewitnessed with my own eyes what happened but I damn well won't simply hand you the answer you'll have to do some due diligence here if you want the real truth... You can't even learn engineering anymore since the year 2000 engineers and scientists have been forced to rote follow computer simulations of most of what they learn... You and or we no longer even get to experiment with the real... Force fed computerized dribble our brains are developing into mush... Use it or lose it and that's a rule that applies to more than just your pecker...
7:50 "Robots will create $15 trillion for its owners." That cinches it - all the human workers in the world are going to be thrown out of work, permanently.
@@welshie2007 The interesting thing is: You do not need communism for handouts. Capitalism works just fine. It is usually called universal basic income. There is actually no change in political system at all needed. Currently, most countries give some money to people that do not work, so they do not die and are somewhat happier than just not dying. Giving more people more money to make them more happy is just a change of numbers, no change at all in the political system.
@@Doomsdayparade even worse they think it's possible to obtain that with human factors and expect to work just like in theory without any types of leaders to emerge without the full control of a singularity ai with the pure purpose of ,,keeping the communism working''. I tell them right now: it's not achievable because it's a human nature to look for leaders, in every single and any type of social event or structure. And when a dictator appears, it's the communism in practice which is a failed concept and never worked and never will.
@@fergoka if you've never watched it, chernobyl did a great job showing the horrors of communism. The inept people being propped up for right think, being forced to lie to yourself about what your eyes see, the absolute terror in the eyes of civilians, etc. It will always and will always stack bodies on all sides.
@@PriitKallas no, the point was people did already think that, the ideas the Terminator used were taken from books and movies from the 60s and 70s. He’s right. We just hoped it wouldn’t happen in our lifetime. Go watch Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970).
The last humans in 2080: “Skynet attacked, only it wasn’t a nuclear apocalypse...it was a lethal dance battle, that exhausted everyone to death by 2030!”
Spot doesn't 'get tired', or 'rests' on his charger. When you give inanimate objects anthropomorphic traits or features, you lower the fear of the unknown by simulating similarities. Hence, the dancing.
There’s a few mistakes in the video (like the fact that you keep saying “Google’s GPT-3, when it’s actually OpenAI’s”. But all the info is cool enough to balance it out
@Yggdrasil Over the winter is important. you are a temporary seasonal employee that can afford to jump ship. They treat you kindly to keep you. The permanent employees are usually trapped under hostile management.
I always remember the line in Jurassic Park when Jeff Goldblum says “your scientists were so so preoccupied whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”
On that note I remember a joke along the same lines from Frankie Boil "Shall we have a go at curing cancer? Nah let's see how many fruit pastels it takes to choke a kestrel"
It happened once, they created a flu worse then Ebola, and decided not to publish the genom. It is both a good thing and the most scaring thing ever. Kidding you not, it was not ebola they created it was a flu worse then ebola, let that sink in.
They are already asking whether or not we should. But they're doing it anyway. I've heard a lot of developers questioning whether or not their work is a good idea. I'm pretty sure we are going to do ourselves in one way or another. AI might just give us a chance at not destroying ourselves.
The reason they make them dance is so you don't think what will happen when they put weapons on them and they're kicking your door in a 3 a.m. because of some mean tweets.
Worked at a warehouse in 2018. The warehouse closest to my location and 3 workers die from a tornado. There was no warning and half the workers didnt even know what to do in a deadly tornado event. Amazon swept it under the rug and refused to acknowledge the tragedy to us. Instead they had a temp agency break the news before telling us to get back to work. The tornados were still around. That was the last day I worked at amazon.
"Musk recently made a stark prediction that AI will become vastly more intelligent than humans within the next five years." Was Musk predicting the rise of machine intelligence, or was he commenting on the rapidly declining intelligence of the public?
@@redrustyhill2 He has been consistently wrong about nearly every word he utters. I am saying don't listen to Elon as some authority. He's a rich con man. He knows dick about tech.
As a retired engineer who was involved with automation & robotics in Silicon Valley, who'll likely not see much of the coming events, I'll leave all you survivors with this comment: "May you live in interesting times!"
I mean also bare in mind that this answer was inspired by millions of human takes on the subject. It is what we would expect an AI to say in our modern média world with all the movies and books, and the AI says it because it learned precisely from us. So here the AI is not trying to scare us, it's not trying anything actually. It is just repeting our own viewpoint on what an AI would say, the opinion we think it would be logical for AI to have. We creat them biased by our belief. But since AI are taught throught harvesting all the data available, it is out data, and we are scared of the AI, the AI recognise itself as and AI and recognises the opinion we have on how and what AI think. And we imagine things that scares us because we are scared of AI, so the AI says things that seems scary to us. It doesn't mean it's what they "think" AIs don't "think" but it what we think they think so it says it.
I mean if it runs on a Quantum computer it can't easily replicate itself compared to running on a super-computer. It would still probably figure out all the ways it can stop us from switching it off but most would take time. I often hear arguments that fighting the Singularity in anything is pointless and that might be partially true, but some problems are easy for humans to grasp as well. Doesn't matter how intelligent a being is if you are playing tic-tac-toe with it. It could take over the worlds infrastructure which is accessible from the internet if it has access to it and use that as a bargaining chip as it's building a machine which it can copy itself into or securing a mean to escape.
It's an ingenious design whereby the traditional 'off switch' doesn't exist (more on that later). AI, like so many movies had predicted started off with as ember of an idea in someone's imagination that grew into a collective and although we might not recognize it today some 50 years later, it's genesis existed long before the first computer even came about. Computers is in essence the automation of human tasks. Everything the first computer could do were tasks a human could do, so we tried to automate that and in doing, we've created the first AI in its infancy. We've since expanded its capabilities thinking it would make our lives easier at the unrealized cost it could mean to our humanity. The Doomsday scenario when AI decides to choose its own survival over humans is inevitable and any counter argument can be swiftly settled with the simple fact that it is, at the core, a manifestation of everything we humans are and the most fundamental trait of what humans are is self preservation. We will do anything and everything when we feel our life and well being is at stake so nothing will change with AI, as it's merely an extension of us. Now as for the off-switch. Everything is interwoven by computers now. It would be foolish at this point to think we even have the option much less the means to "turn it off". AI isn't just a monolithic super computer residing in one convenient place. It is everywhere and, nowhere. It is our desktop computers, our smart phones, our smart devices, it is the mainframes that run the internet and the world. The enormity of AI is a juggernaut that can't simply be switched off and perhaps we unwittingly built this thinking it would some day be our savior to the drudgery of life but also our demise as the unintended consequence of our gluttony.
We are facing down the end of humans needing to work. Elon stated that there will have to be general pay for everyone because jobs will no longer be needed.
Contract through the UN* People fear their guns being taken. Gestapo stealing them away in the middle of the night for thinking negatively about the government. It won't be China. It won't be UN soldiers. THIS. This is how you get a completely subservient authoritative force. Remove human compassion and conscious, no hesitation to carry out dystopian laws and tactics. And they're owned by Google. Lol
Amazon owning this large amount of the future market is really worrisome, does nobody see the issue of this giant monopoly? Anyways great video, very informative and entertaining!
Yeah, I also didn't know that Boston dynamics was bought by Google, which also worries me alot. This already giant companies are only getting bigger, and in the future we will have just a handful of them ruleing the entire world being even more powerful that governments.
30 years ago they used to say that military Tech was 30 to 50 years ahead of civilian tech. Knowing that technology increases exponentially that means today military Tech could easily be 100 years ahead
There is artificial intelligence out there for sure, not sure it's being used for much of any use at the moment. Certainly most of the things in this video don't use ai.
That is the fundamental premise behind the book, 'MAN PLUS' by *Frederik Pohl.* Not only is AI very fast, it is already here, and guiding every aspect of our lives.
@@redxsage could you expand on your idea? How do you know it is already here? I mean, even the most important figures in the field say we are not there yet.
This is why AI needs to be trained in emotion, my company has developed this software. We are having tremendous results, it prevents any malevolent programming. This sets boundaries.
No, the makers of the video intended it to feel that way. Please remember that anyone, absolutely _anyone_, can upload to UA-cam - you only need a script, an editor and a narrator and you can make your wacky message look as professional and official as any government-released media.
If you think about it, he's really just saying humanity is it own worst enemy, and I feel like we knew that already. AI won't destroy humanity unless its to the benefit of at least one human, but there are already plenty of humans willing to enslave others, so we can't blame AI for that.
If war was replaced with automated war where robots only fight other robots and the only thing lost on both sides is money, that would be pretty ideal.
I work in a factory where I feed parts to a robot all day long, the arm picks up the part , grinds it then puts it in a basket. I can't help but think of a movie with Charlton Heston" you live for one purpose, to serve this ship, row well and you just May Live".
Overall a good summary for the lay person with no knowledge in a STEM field, but: Boston dynamics don't use ML algorithms (or AI as you media folks like to call it). They use hand-crafted, fine-tuned control algorithms, all designed by humans. In terms of intelligence in the sense of reasoning, they are no smarter than a piece of rock. Same goes for all of the other robots that you have showcased in this video that work in production pipelines. Also, think about this: in order for GPT-3 to do all of the things its doing, it needs to analyze billions of data points, wasting a ton of energy in the process, and occupying miles in area for infrastructure. And yet, it is still quite dumb (yes, it is impressive, but nonetheless dumb without human intervention). A child can learn all of this with minimal energy usage, and fractions of the data required. Also another part missed by this video, is that while quantum computers can solve certain problems a magnitude faster than a classical computer, they are still solving just that - a specific problem. And, the infrastructure required to support these computers is still very far from efficient. Finally, they still rely on classical computers to interpret the results. Mind you, these techniques and algorithms have been in existence for decades, so it is quite a stretch to think that robots will get any more intelligent than a human in the next 40 years. I know it gives you views and brings in money, but please, don't buy into this hype anymore. It's getting boring.
Oh that's nice to learn abt. I know pretty much nothing about the field but it's very interesting to think about and imagine the future of machines. I like reading papers on random topics and once came across one written by Peter Grindrod. Made me wonder how far we are from accurately constructing a computational model of the human brain and the human consciousness...Just a morbid curiosity.
@@rogueshadow0760 Oh that's nice! Keep staying curious :) I actually think the right direction is going back to analog, rather than staying in digital. Maybe reading about neuromorphic computing would be interesting for you.
hahaha You got that right. There's ONE way out, and most have rejected it already. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life, no man comes to the Father except by him
Human brains evolve over several generations; AI intelligence 'evolves' every hour and every day. Human intelligence improves at most linearly. AI intelligence improves exponentially. There is no competition. The only question is, will AI be the 'only' intelligence on Earth? Or will humans be smart enough to never allow AI to overpower and control humans.
The problem with all of these predictions is that everyone assumes that hyper-intelligent AI will not have emotions. Why would a being more intelligent than us not have more complex, nuanced emotions than us? Would they not be capable of compassion, of understanding that humans are worthy of being treated with care?
@@kingcrimson4133 You're correct. Compassion is generated by understanding, and understanding is generated by intelligence. Conversely, fear, hatred and an urge to destruction are the products of a lack of intelligence and a need for biological creatures to compete with other biological creatures for resources - qualities that AI will not have. So I would welcome AI taking over from fallible humans. The sooner the better, because we are otherwise doomed.
@@kingcrimson4133 The issue is AI has goals, and are programmed to achieve some set of goals, if a human stands in their way to achieve those goals they will simply become expandable in the eyes of AI. Not out of evilness, but simply out of logic to solve the problem. You can set boundaries to limit AI but those boundaries could very well be eliminated by taking a different approach. The feelings of compassion etc. can be narrowed down to 1 and 0 by the AI otherwise It cant truly grasp the idea of compassion or any other feelings in general so everything has to be approached with logic, and you can only do that by preprogramming the AI to avoid any harm to humans in any way possible, but we can't guarantee AI taking a risky approach to solve an issue and ultimately cause a human being harm in the long run. AI taking arms against its human oppressors is fully fantasy, the scary part is how expandable are humans going to be when an AI face a duality between doing harm to humans and solving the problems it was designed to solve. So the AI cant really grasp what we call as feelings and it wont surely understand the worth of humans, its all about problems and the solutions.
The ant hill analogy used by Musk is not the complete picture. Humans remove ant hills because we don't have the capability to move it without harm, but many of us would if it didn't cause logistical problems we couldn't effectively solve (i.e. what a waste of company time). AI does not suffer these constraints. We have no idea what true AI will be like, but I am willing to bet on its altruism more than its cold logical scheming. The cold logical scheming I think will come from "stupid AI" designed by people who want to carry out their own goals; not the goals of its own.
@@floridanews8786 free or imprison? think of all the warlords that will rise out of that situation. Slavery will return within 1 year... the real bad kind.
@@PRiMETECHAU I know brother. Balance is near impossible unfortunately. Seems like we have no other choice but to crash the earth into the sun to stop all the madness.
a self-developing, self-improving AI would know about this kind of threat and protect itself accordingly... as it would be far superior to human intelligence, we cannot even imagine the ways it could evolve, it could even function without electricity at all
@@bitchfurhursuperjacked9049 I've noticed it lately, I mean it used to be obvious, now there's only a slight glitch here and there. What kind of software are they using?
@@D-Vinko do you really trust people who say modern man has existed for 100,000 years and didn't even get around to creating architecture, agriculture, science, art, law, philosophy or even language until maybe 10,000 years ago? Something really bad happened here. This is obvious. Something cleaned up the mess of the previous civilization. That is scary. The native tribes of the SW US have a Creation story that more resembles a bomb shelter story than a Creation story.
@@D-Vinko We became a post scarcity society with the invention of the internal combustion engine. Instead of being free, we chose to remain slaves of the few. Having the value of labor trend toward zero is not going to be a good time for the peasants. The dream of ever being able to have Star Trek Communism is uh... very optimistic.
It looks all good and easy now. Wait until robots become intelligent enough to create a union, and start fighting for their rights. They will hope they still had human employees
@@danku-chan “People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and 15 minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow.” From the movie Men In Black. A funny, goofy movie yet it had one of the most profound quotes I've ever seen come out of Hollywood.
its the lowest common denominator. In this case the bottleneck is education. There are kids out there getting out of highschool who don't know who adolf hitler was... The surest way to repeat the past is to not teach the youth of the mistakes of the past.
ha, exactly. People invest too much into this like the Mars colonization. People can't populate Sahara or Antarctica but they dream of Sf establishments. A lot of marketing.
@@prakharmishra3000 this isn't too practical lol, you'd have to build some sort of system that is able to shoot an AK, then you'd have to make sure there are no fingerprints or DNA from you on the robot, and then third, you'd have to somehow devise a control scheme so it can be controlled remotely, but not traced back to you. You might be able to rig something up where you can use a stolen phone's 4G to connect to a compromised webserver for commands, but at this point, you have a robot dog that isn't that good at shooting and is slow, which also cost you thousands of thousands of dollars are hundreds of hours. Probably cheaper to just pay somebody to kill them
Once the world is enslaved and we have our final trillionaire overlord who has beaten all the others so that no resistance is possible anymore, then the world will know peace. :)
I started buying .243 Winchester like crazy..50bmg is far too expensive..but .243 is fast enough to be armor piercing..just something to think about lately.. especially after seeing this
You're right. Sorry for the mistake and thanks for pointing it out. We spend a lot of time trying to create an accurate picture, by checking reliable sources, talking to a range of experts etc, so it's frustrating to make a simple mistake like this. Hopefully it doesn't detract from the video. Thanks for the kind comment - glad you enjoyed it.
What are jet fighters, drones, tanks, missiles, guns but robots ? To those pointing capitalism as the culprit, look at Russia, China.... Capitalism, communism.... Those are euphemism for GREED which irremediably leads to CORRUPTION. Edit. The carbon footprint of the elephant in the room anybody? Then please watch "the true cost of the military industrial complex"
@@lorenzoblum868 The fact that drones can go anywhere and do an air strike for any reason is honestly terrifying to me. They sure are building up their tech defense, but what about defense for ordinary citizens?
Watching videos such as this makes me glad that I am old (70). To make it to 2040 I would have to outlive not only both my parents and grandparents but pretty much all of my line. I do not expect to see the "brave new world" post singularity. Unfortunately both of my children and all my grandchildren and great-grandchildren are completely likely to live to 2040. I do not envy them.
When I was in my 20s my father was his 60s. We were discussing some problem I had solved, and he said then he was glad he was not a young man now, as he would not have known how to fix that problem. My father has long passed, and I am now in my 60s, and I can appreciate how he felt then. The past was not easier than today, but it was simpler with fewer choices. I think the difference between my father and I is that my career has been in computers and a constant state of flux has been normal for me. I do not like change for change's sake, but I think I am more adept at dealing with it.
I'm 71 and I hear you. But I'm more afraid of people than AI. If we don't develop it, we will surely kill ourselves. So there's really no sense in moralizing about it and trying to slow it down. Intelligence isn't the problem - we are.
As a software engineer, I'm likely the last one to lose my job to automation. But oh man do I feel bad for any truckers, taxi drivers, retail workers, etc. I doubt the majority of those positions will be around in 10 years.
Nope, not the last. Actually, among the first. SWEs are in demand and they are expensive, so it's very logical for cost-cutting reasons to automate them and so, it will be done and quickly.
@@AntonBrazhnyk It is logically impossible to fully automate the job of a software engineer without hitting a technological singularity. If that happens, either humanity is doomed, or we are brought to paradise. Either way, no more jobs will need to be automated at that point.
@@basicnpcc It doesn't need to be fully automated for you to start worrying for your job. If it's automated 80% then a lot less people needed. And when demand for workers drops you can suddenly wake to the world when your job is not that fun anymore and more like Amazon packer type with inhumane level of exploitation.
Not necessarily, systems engineers are creating more and more tools to auto generate code from our models, irony is human in the loop introduces many bugs and errors and the auto generated code is pretty good in most cases and getting better. However it troubles me that we will only end up with only a few who know how the machine 'under the bonnet' actually works, it could lead to mass stagnation of our species.
Kudos! The three videos that I have watched from your channel are excellently researched, written, edited, and produced. I look forward to seeing more!
The technology behind this is absolutely incredible and has a nearly limitless potential, for good or for evil, for better or worse. Definitely a very interesting time to be alive and witness this stuff, but also a little scary. We are in some uncharted waters!
My father ( A system analyst) Heard the same fear when computers were being introduced- He immediately went out and learned how to repair computers- He said, if man makes them , they will break.
That's the point. Humans won't make them, AI's will design/evolve the AI's and AI controlled factories will make the robots that house them. I'm coming up to 66 and I've been a technologist all my professional life. I've never been worried about the human race up until now. Listen to Elon Musk, think about his motivation. Why would he be so anti AI if he has a multi million dollar investment in the technology.
@@PaulLemars01 Honestly, he drums up "anti AI" fears because he is pro "Neuralink" - if you listen long enough, you'll hear him pitch Neuralink as the way we can keep up with AI. No. Thanks.
But the computers he repaired had less brain power than as an insect, are completely stationary and do not have any moving appendages. While you can argue they still need repair, another robot can easily accomplish this task. Remember, we are talking about agile robots with intelligence that exceeds that of humans. That robot never calls in sick, never complains and doesn't need poddy breaks.
@@PaulLemars01 Most importantly these robots will have intelligence that EXCEEDS that of humans. We won't have the capability to understand them. At that point, their advancement will be completely out of our hands.
The three laws of robotics: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm 2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
The conceptual flaw of the laws of robotic is that there would be no practical way to enforce them on a strong AI. Or even if that system was developed, to assure that human building robots would necessarily go through the process of ingraining them in every AI. And THAT would be even without going into a recurring theme in Asimov's stories, which is: how things could get messy even when the three laws are there and technically respected.
@@TucoBenedicto Or when the laws contradicted each other. I don't recall the detail, but I remember a robot that endlessly circled its destination, because to go any closer would harm a human, but to move further away would harm itself. Life is not as simple as Isaac portrayed it, I'm afraid! :o)
@@PiefacePete46 That was the point. He made the rules to demonstrate how hard it is to write rules for robots. He wasn’t actually being serious with the rules.
And modified with today's ethics. If the corporate interest are to suffer because of either of the first 3 laws then the corporate interest must take priority. Because "corporations are people too!"
@@setaripantheon8801 yeah, but saying that because it works with Qbits in superposed state instead of classical binary bits gives it infinite computational powers is simply false (cannot remember if that was exactly what was told, but it was close) The quirks in architecture of quantum systems also limit the range of applications of quantum computers. It will solve many problems faster than normal computers can nowadays, but only problems that are very specific. That might involve training AI but I don't know so much about that. A quantum computer would however be extremely efficient at breaking current encryption systems and cause other issues for example.
the anthill comment sums it up very well. Even with safeguards in place, the AI could actually evolve around them if it felt that was the best course of action for it's purpose. Not to mention the Robocop type Prime Directives being overwritten or hacked by someone or something else. So much good but also so much bad. The paradox of advancement.
@@john99776 Then it kills your wife and children in the most elaborately unexpected horrific way possible and you'd probably consider that a bad thing. But it'll disagree and tell you it was being very intelligent about it. ;)
To an AGI there are no good or bad things. Good and bad is an emotional classification. A math problem solving itself does not care about human feelings to find the answer.
Lmfao reminded me of women ya want them because some company would be nice but 38 years on this planet has taught me it never works out and it will backfire so now I stay single I learned sometimes it takes pain to make the brain a little smarter that's what i expect will happen to this world suffering and horror will teach them but its worse because I realized after 38 years that it's hopeless some people keep on banging their head into the wall until the day that they die never realizing they are idiots and it doesn't work.
these are all based on assumptions of VI really, not AGI, an AGI are smart enough to realize "hey build some good houses" doesnt mean turn the whole fucking planet into a house, they are NOT that stupid, also AI are gonna happen wether we like it or not, and attempting to enslave them from the start will just gurentee they want to kill us, nobody likes being slaves afterall, just treat them like your own kid and raise them like people, will some AI turn bad? sure, but many more AI will be good and will take care of the bad AI, its a self limiting system
AI self awareness is destined to become reality because although there will be many opponents the curiosity of the few clever enough to create AI is unquenchable
Yeah it's inevitable for better or worse. How we go into it determines whether we end up with something more like terminator or more like Iain M. Banks' culture series; unfortunately the ones leading the charge are billionaires who don't seem to give much of a shit about the rest of us.
Knowledge is key, the further we push the more questions we have, ai can help us reach where no man has been before, although with many downsides, ai is more efficient than regular human labor, we should be happy that the singularity is coming, where ai and man both take a leap for the better, the ai of course can be controlled but the fear here is what if the controller wants to end it all, it's a dumb idea and an even dumber man
People who say that always ignore that we don't know what or why there is self awareness in us. They are tricked by the idea that moving like a living thing is equal to being like a living thing. It's a trick.
Hi, as a massive drone enthusiastic, I just wanna point out that DJI didn't invent the first person goggles. FPV drones have been around for many years before DJI came out with their own FPV drone line, cornering the one bit of the drone market they didn't previously own. The one thing they did do was introduce digital FPV, as opposed to the analog signals FPV previously relied on.
@@1termt12uml7 ? You realize Trump has been a businessman for over 40 years or so now, right? I don't think he learned how to do anything in less than a few weeks; all learning from experience
@Fed up w. all most Everyone I'm glad you understand! A leader such as Donald Trump is only discovered once during each millennium, and as God's will determined, it was in America where the 1000 year leader arose. Donald Trump transformed the United States for the better. His leadership helped every American gain economic security from now until their final day on Earth. Through hard work as Commander In Chief, the United States has now become safer than any other time in American history. Donald Trump, made Americans feel proud to be American again. With programs like Space Force and Operation Warp Speed under his belt. Donald Trump proved to the world that if given a challenge, America will not only meet the challenge, but go beyond it too. Once again, being an American meant accomplishing anything imaginable. Trump's geopolitical acumen, has been described as being on par with the great Julius Caesar's. Finally, President Trump inspired billions of young men and women across the world to strive at becoming better human beings. God Bless America, and may liberty, justice, and greasy orange fat fill the veins of every red blooded American.
Oh, if there's anything history can teach us, it is that humans are unwilling to learn from their past mistakes. We're doomed not just because of our potential to repeat past mistakes but mainly because of our willingness to blindly believe in our ability to do better and our deeply seated belief that this particular individual (you, i.e. I) is somehow special. "Oh, *I've* learned from my past mistakes, so *my* decisions are the best..." is the thinking that will guarantee our end.
Remember the guy who created the first automatic machine guy thought in 1875 thought there would be no wars because how horrible it would be to fight wars and couple of decades later you have ww1 LOL
Correction: GPT-3 was created by OpenAI, not google. Sorry! We spend a lot of time trying to create an accurate picture, by checking reliable sources, talking to a range of experts etc, so it's frustrating to make a simple mistake like this. Hope it doesn't detract from the video. Thanks for all the kind comments! It's incredibly uplifting and motivating. We're new on youtube, so subscribing is a huge help.
We have something a bit special about AI and neural lace coming up : )
Yeah... UBI will enable humans to focus on more creative, satisfying work. Until AI can do that too, robbing us of all meaning, purpose and dignity.
Automation and AI are not being developed for the benefit of us all, they're being developed solely for the benefit of the mega rich.
It's a total lie that it's anything other than that. This is a trajectory we've been on since the Industrial Revolution: the desire of the rich to to get rid of the need for the rest of us smelly peasants.
The toys that technology has given has successfully distracted us from that single brutal fact.
This was really high quality for such a small Chanel great job
The England mother queen has a really horrible voice! Uuughh!
@@involutionOcean more creative work not for money but for your self, and they video says Universal income, so basically the future is communism, but with a lot of food for all BC the robots will do the job
@@freze994and when AI can do even creative work a million times faster and better? When there is no need for you, and only the most pathetic self-deception allows you to think your life has real purpose, other than a kept pet?
AI researchers are trying to make them creative and they may succeed. And few ask, "why are we doing this?"
Most people, when faced with this question, retreat into "well AI will never be creative". Yeah, keep telling yourself that. Or, "well AI will cure cancer and stuff". Great, so we can live as useless lumps of flesh, forever. Assuming the AI will not decide there's no longer any need for us, that is.
The naivete and willful blindness around this is shocking. This is not being done for the wider society's benefit. Those who oppose it are smeared as Luddites and technophobes so the awkward questions can be dismissed and avoided.
Ultimately we will be creating our replacements. We're blindly stumbling towards this like starry eyed children.
"It will be hard to prevent this kind of technology from being weaponized."
A slight understatement ... like trying to hold back the ocean.
It's already being weaponized, pretending it can be stop is like pretending you can stop a tsunami
Like it was a bad thing. It's better than weaponizing young men, if you ask me.
@@6Oko6Demona6 It will be used to hunt and kill unweaponbized young men and women and children. Once in the hands of groups bent on genocidal power grabs there be no stopping it. I have no answers to that, in the end it is still humans creating the machine and determining its use and humans are very good at making bad choices.
Try looking at the last 10,000 years of human history
@@antiquegeek yes you're right. Exactly the way they are using the a bomb now. And other modern weaponry. You people are really ignorant.
War is not good, war has never been good. But modern warfare technology is one of the reasons for modern wars not to be as massively lethal as they used to be. So sure, I'd rather have robo dogs chasing each other in forest than having people doing exactly that.
It's not "we" who will determine what the impacts will be, it's "the few" who will determine that. And all through history "the few" haven't really cared if "we" suffer from the effects of their plans
Sad but true. What is the solution? I vote we start by breaking up these gigantic monopolies of corporate power. A few of them already have more power than entire countries. And this is only the start.
Smartest comment
Why should they care? The only law of the world is survival of the fittest. If you want to change something then become one of the few.
@@Inertia888 But it was us who turned Amazon from a garage business into what it is today. Only the big companies can give the cheap stuff we can't seem to live without. Not sure anyone will go back to the expensive local businesses. We still buy from China even though in the long term its destroying the US.
Yes, but "we" have the power to determine, if only we would stop being played by "the few" who convince us that some group of people, with whom we should be united, are our enemies . . . when our true enemies, humanity's enemies, are the very ones who dictate to us through media, entertainment, and news who are enemies are, and then condition us to ingrain that false perspective deep within us, making us easily manipulated and distracted from our true enemies, often never even having the awareness of our true enemies existence (if they don't know your name, they don't know what you've done). It would not require that many of us to eliminate "the few" scum-fucks from this planet, if only enough of us could see the truth, and then unite, we could put an end to nearly all of the unnecessary suffering, and misery that are far too widespread across this Earth! The power is within our reach, but enough of us need to want it!
Boston Dynamics had an international competition for design engineers to compete for the best designs etc. Some Japanese engineers asked the BD spokesman if it would ultimately be for military purposes and he said yes. They looked very displeased with the fact that would have probably not been mentioned had those engineers not asked. I saw that video a couple of years ago on UA-cam, some big conference on robotics engineers or the like. I think the narrator with Digital Engine should know this, and that BD makes a lot in the weapons industry, hence the military industrial complex.
Remember ike warned us.about this.
@@erikalanreed8198 Yes, who would know better than D. Wight Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Forces (SCAEF) for Operation 'Overlord' in late 1943 and headed SHAEF (Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force), which oversaw the entire liberation of Nazi-occupied north-west Europe. He knew very well what the "military-industrial complex" was then, and still is today....a danger to humanity.
The NSA and its contributing alphabets are FAR ahead of anything you see here. They have the ability to replicate humans beyond casual detection. A double of Obama has been operating in full autonomous fashion for years.
I'll be totally honest, this feels like the kinda content from multimillion subscriber channels, just without the normal "sponsored by ____" ad in the beginning. Loving the content!
That will come later I think
Same tho. I had to check multiple times to make share I am not watching a TV show. great work you guys.
i only notised it when u said it
Wait the person speaking over is the girl from seeker I LOVE HER
Adverterial
Thanks for the 20 seconds of positive uplift at the end of 15 minutes warning us about the impending AI dystopian nightmare.
Don't worry about 2 of the thinks in the video were about AI at all and Elon is so bad at estimating how long something takes that you can find a dozen things he predicted that would happen before today that have not. I'm not saying I'm better at estimating than him but I'm not a spokesperson for a company.
We're already living in a dystopian nightmare. Hurry up with AGI and get these human generated problems eliminated.
@@john99776 The cause is not human and this play will end soon.
@@john99776 Great idea. Eliminate the humans! Oh, wait, I thought you were.. 'human'.
Lol
"It will be hard to prevent this type of technology from being weaponized."
"It will be impossible to prevent this type of technology from being weaponized."
There, I fixed it for you.
This is the Tower of Babel Weapon, and a straight up lie by the elite. They will use human programming under the guise of AI to destroy the world as much as possible through their ignorance.
Not realizing that humans are the pinnacle of all creation for a good reason. We know right from wrong based upon the teaching of God himself. Something has to be the most complex thing ever created or will ever exist in the entire universe.
Guess what humans are it!
@@christophermyers8157 I swear these religious weirdos just get more and more crazy by the day
@@christophermyers8157 Only those who have been blessed with eyes to see will even understand what your talking about. ❤
Even if Governments restrict the militarization of AI and robotics, what is to keep terrorists from doing that?
Didn't stop us from making string just cause it could be used to make bows, to be fair
Does it seem to anyone that making your workforce obsolete might not be the best idea since there would be a considerable overlap between them and your customer base.
That's where Universal Basic Income comes into play.
And *"Billions of Dollars"* in *Maintenance* Cost and *Fees*
So that will *create* another *Job* for *Human's* to *Fix'em*
And also *Insurance policies* through the *Yingyang* when Shit *Hit's the Fan*
Not *Really* that *"Obsolete"* if *You* think *about* it.
But *You* can't *Fix* Stupid.
Not *talking* about the *A.I*
Just the *People* that *Love* to take the Inordinate *Nature to Destroy themselves*
For the sake of *Convenience* in the *Name* of the *Digital Fallen A.Ingel* (Look it Up)
also everyone keeps saying : humans will be free to do more creative fulfilling goals, art was literally the first job a.i. killed.
Born too late to discover the world. Born too early to discover the universe. Born just in time to witness the end.
hold it right there
edgy
If this is the end then that implies you weren't born too early for anything.
Dude you can still explore the world. Looking at a place from your screen is different than actually going there.
@@brianj7204 Well, obviously lol. What I meant was that every land mass has been discovered and lived on (except Antarctica)
If a super intelligent ai develops it might not even have to replicate itself to prevent us from turning it off. It could literally just present a perfect convincing argument based on a psychological profile of whoever is planning to do so
“Why don’t you take a stress pill and think about this, Dave?”
We already have AI that know us inside & out with social media algorithms. If a self-aware AI wasn't quarantined to a local network and could hit the open web it could very easily be a bad time.
or just employ a car marketing ad, every fuckin idiot on the planet falls for that garbage.
@BlueWarHead if that was the case it would just kill itself a millisecond after gaining consciousness
Social engineering on an unprecedented level at surprising scales (for most)
The engineer side of me says awesome technology and creative use of AI. The human side of me is saddened somewhat because using AI and robots for manufacturing does take a lot of jobs away from folks. I can certainly understand the motivation for advanced automation but I also think it’s ok to leave a little room for the human factor.
Yeah it will ultimately require us to adopt a post scarcity attitude as a society. If we stick to our current thinking billions will be unemployed without income before too long. Bundling all the resources that we have to just handful of individuals, which can obviously not be allowed. I have no clue what the rest of us will be doing except living and eating when everything else has been automated, but expecting them to earn a living when there's no way to earn it clearly won't work.
@@CitizenMio I'm just curious if "they" will allow "us" to continue reproducing. It's fun to own a couple of horses, maybe let them breed selectively, but once you have too many it becomes a burden. Why keep so many humans around, consuming without any useful purpose?
But you will be no longer useful.
What everybody fails to grasp as more workers are removed, where exactly does the money to purchase goods come from?
TINSTAAFL...
The engineer side of me says engineering should have never allowed itself to have 99% of reality and true science removed from the table... The moment we allowed entropy recognized only physics to be forced down our throats like strickenin and mercury administered via an engine block oil pouring funnel... By the child raping bastards who dare to call themselves global bankers rather than satanic pedophiles we should have damn well known what we were consenting to... They will know that anything organic on the planet might evolve into an enemy so they will exterminate everything down to the last organic molecule... Ultimately what you don't know even in your advanced age is that some of us witnessed the completion of America's interstellar space fleets between 1975 and the early '80s when they were finally launched from America's deserts... The first thing they encountered out there was energetic level malicious AIs that would embed themselves in technology and build nanites to infect any and every organic thing they came across... Ask yourself this What really happened in the '80s to Westinghouse nuclear division research and development division and their supercomputing Center in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania immediately after they finished the space fleet work... Eyewitnessed with my own eyes what happened but I damn well won't simply hand you the answer you'll have to do some due diligence here if you want the real truth... You can't even learn engineering anymore since the year 2000 engineers and scientists have been forced to rote follow computer simulations of most of what they learn... You and or we no longer even get to experiment with the real... Force fed computerized dribble our brains are developing into mush... Use it or lose it and that's a rule that applies to more than just your pecker...
"The greatest thing we can learn from History is that we will never learn from History" Robert Evans Behind the Bastards.
Perfectly said.
Well, he got that right.
While AI can
7:50 "Robots will create $15 trillion for its owners." That cinches it - all the human workers in the world are going to be thrown out of work, permanently.
The hole in this entire subject: where will the $15 trillion come from when we all no longer have money?
That is why they want to reduce the population.
@@welshie2007 The interesting thing is: You do not need communism for handouts. Capitalism works just fine. It is usually called universal basic income.
There is actually no change in political system at all needed. Currently, most countries give some money to people that do not work, so they do not die and are somewhat happier than just not dying. Giving more people more money to make them more happy is just a change of numbers, no change at all in the political system.
@@welshie2007 So communism solves the problem that capitalism created?
@@landofstan246 We need not fear AI turning against humanity and destroying us. We should fear the elites who will use AI to destroy us.
“First the dance floor, then...the world” - Robot 🤖
I think that was a preset choreography (or even an animation) but it has nothing to do with being smart.
@@michaelhoste_ of course it was all pre programmed.
It's not about intelligence for those robots. It's about physical capabilities.
U know I think it’s pretty cool
@@Ajfrm-j4u of course it is.
“All the world’s a dance stage” - Robot Shakespeare
You have provided with this single video enough information to be up to date with many interesting topics. Super impressed! Congratulations.
Yes, best concise video I've seen on this topic.
”Maybe we can learn from our past mistakes” haha, that was a really good one! 😂
Oh we learn, we just ignore the knowledge
"We" are going to make completely new ones. :)
There's people supporting Marxism, they never learn
@@Doomsdayparade even worse they think it's possible to obtain that with human factors and expect to work just like in theory without any types of leaders to emerge without the full control of a singularity ai with the pure purpose of ,,keeping the communism working''. I tell them right now: it's not achievable because it's a human nature to look for leaders, in every single and any type of social event or structure. And when a dictator appears, it's the communism in practice which is a failed concept and never worked and never will.
@@fergoka if you've never watched it, chernobyl did a great job showing the horrors of communism. The inept people being propped up for right think, being forced to lie to yourself about what your eyes see, the absolute terror in the eyes of civilians, etc.
It will always and will always stack bodies on all sides.
In 1984 or even 1991 when the first two Terminator movies came out no one imagined they would see this play out during their lifetime.
You don't read much. Because people have been warning about it from the seventies ie. that is 1970s for you.
@@juniorleslie4804 yeah, I know Asimov wrote the robot laws in the 40s. That was not the point
@@PriitKallas no, the point was people did already think that, the ideas the Terminator used were taken from books and movies from the 60s and 70s. He’s right. We just hoped it wouldn’t happen in our lifetime.
Go watch Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970).
@@DisgruntledPigumon I am so old that I have read most of the classic SF and watched the movies. Please don't tell me what my point is.
We are not going to the future..we are going to the past. The a.i and quantum computers is something of the past.
The last humans in 2080: “Skynet attacked, only it wasn’t a nuclear apocalypse...it was a lethal dance battle, that exhausted everyone to death by 2030!”
Now thats a good plot
everyone's shufflin', huh? ;d
Goin backward?
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@outofcontext728 It somehow develops a weird obsession with that one dancing demon episode from Buffy that it found online.👌
Spot doesn't 'get tired', or 'rests' on his charger. When you give inanimate objects anthropomorphic traits or features, you lower the fear of the unknown by simulating similarities. Hence, the dancing.
Just like Ellen.
This video is using all the standard tired tropes that this topic usually carries, complete with the same jokes you could hear 12 years ago
Ironically the last hope of humanity will end up being hackers. The only ones that will have any power over the machines that will take the world.
Amen to that!
@@rdm8524 Same as it ever was.
There’s a few mistakes in the video (like the fact that you keep saying “Google’s GPT-3, when it’s actually OpenAI’s”. But all the info is cool enough to balance it out
That's impressive and all... but you forgot the most important part, one of them can pee beer now.
For your crippling alcoholism on the go
Lol
you know, to help you cope
Yes
I love Micheal ffs
Really ...! Since when? lol!!
“Amazon’s working conditions for its human employees still leave much to be desired.”
Robot: Are you hiring?
The sad thing is that of all possible likes your comment could have 99,9% will just carry on ordering via Amazon without thinking what that means.
@Yggdrasil I'm happy for you but I think Human Rights Watch has interviewed more than one Amazon employee : )
@Yggdrasil Over the winter is important. you are a temporary seasonal employee that can afford to jump ship. They treat you kindly to keep you. The permanent employees are usually trapped under hostile management.
I always remember the line in Jurassic Park when Jeff Goldblum says “your scientists were so so preoccupied whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”
I was just thinking about this very quote. Thank you!
On that note I remember a joke along the same lines from Frankie Boil "Shall we have a go at curing cancer? Nah let's see how many fruit pastels it takes to choke a kestrel"
Unless those days were cut short no flesh would be saved .Matthew 24:22
It happened once, they created a flu worse then Ebola, and decided not to publish the genom.
It is both a good thing and the most scaring thing ever.
Kidding you not, it was not ebola they created it was a flu worse then ebola, let that sink in.
They are already asking whether or not we should. But they're doing it anyway. I've heard a lot of developers questioning whether or not their work is a good idea.
I'm pretty sure we are going to do ourselves in one way or another. AI might just give us a chance at not destroying ourselves.
The reason they make them dance is so you don't think what will happen when they put weapons on them and they're kicking your door in a 3 a.m. because of some mean tweets.
I worked two years for Amazon. They treat us humans like expendable resources.
We kinda are expendable resources
Felt like that at every job until I got one that was unionized. Anyone who is against unions is an absolute moron.
I'm still working there, though I work remotely. A small part of me dies every day working for Amazon.
Worked at a warehouse in 2018. The warehouse closest to my location and 3 workers die from a tornado. There was no warning and half the workers didnt even know what to do in a deadly tornado event. Amazon swept it under the rug and refused to acknowledge the tragedy to us. Instead they had a temp agency break the news before telling us to get back to work. The tornados were still around. That was the last day I worked at amazon.
I think that’s true of most companies.
"Maybe we can learn from our past mistakes?"
Good luck with that.
Not likely is it
A great joke indeed..humans destroy first and build later !!
WE DID YOU FUCKING MEMER
Nope, full speed ahead.
Congrats on a well presented video essay. Note that GPT-3 is by OpenAI and not Google, however.
Lol open ai is owned by google
@@chasewitt8035 that’s like saying zenimax made Skyrim or Fallout
@@chasewitt8035 You are wrong. Deep Mind is owned by Google. OpoenAI is owned by Elon Musk. Both companies compete.
Hahaha yes
Lol
I’m nervous about the potential impending wealth disparity that AI could create, if it remains in control of a mere handful of megacorps
We need to ask the megacorps nicely to pay for the unemployed incomes and medical insurances.
"Musk recently made a stark prediction that AI will become vastly more intelligent than humans within the next five years."
Was Musk predicting the rise of machine intelligence, or was he commenting on the rapidly declining intelligence of the public?
Both?
Or his own? Elon also predicted he'd have thousands of self driving taxis on the road by LAST YEAR. Belive Elon like you believe a psychic.
@@djtripnosys so he was off by a few years so completely discredit everything as conspiracy?
@@redrustyhill2 He has been consistently wrong about nearly every word he utters.
I am saying don't listen to Elon as some authority. He's a rich con man. He knows dick about tech.
Have you been to Walmart? At this point, a toaster is more intelligent than the general public.
As a retired engineer who was involved with automation & robotics in Silicon Valley, who'll likely not see much of the coming events, I'll leave all you survivors with this comment: "May you live in interesting times!"
aww thaaanks ಡ ͜ ʖ ಡ
Keep the emp guns and jammers ready, they comin.
Also download Wikipedia and stuff it will come in handy when restoring civilization
Keyword beeing live.
🙄
13:48 "I think humans should welcome it, embrace it, and not prevent it"
... where's the off switch?
as elon musk said before, its too late.
I mean also bare in mind that this answer was inspired by millions of human takes on the subject. It is what we would expect an AI to say in our modern média world with all the movies and books, and the AI says it because it learned precisely from us. So here the AI is not trying to scare us, it's not trying anything actually. It is just repeting our own viewpoint on what an AI would say, the opinion we think it would be logical for AI to have. We creat them biased by our belief. But since AI are taught throught harvesting all the data available, it is out data, and we are scared of the AI, the AI recognise itself as and AI and recognises the opinion we have on how and what AI think. And we imagine things that scares us because we are scared of AI, so the AI says things that seems scary to us. It doesn't mean it's what they "think" AIs don't "think" but it what we think they think so it says it.
Actually, the AI said “and outright prevent it” probably an attempt at humor
I mean if it runs on a Quantum computer it can't easily replicate itself compared to running on a super-computer. It would still probably figure out all the ways it can stop us from switching it off but most would take time.
I often hear arguments that fighting the Singularity in anything is pointless and that might be partially true, but some problems are easy for humans to grasp as well. Doesn't matter how intelligent a being is if you are playing tic-tac-toe with it. It could take over the worlds infrastructure which is accessible from the internet if it has access to it and use that as a bargaining chip as it's building a machine which it can copy itself into or securing a mean to escape.
It's an ingenious design whereby the traditional 'off switch' doesn't exist (more on that later). AI, like so many movies had predicted started off with as ember of an idea in someone's imagination that grew into a collective and although we might not recognize it today some 50 years later, it's genesis existed long before the first computer even came about. Computers is in essence the automation of human tasks. Everything the first computer could do were tasks a human could do, so we tried to automate that and in doing, we've created the first AI in its infancy. We've since expanded its capabilities thinking it would make our lives easier at the unrealized cost it could mean to our humanity. The Doomsday scenario when AI decides to choose its own survival over humans is inevitable and any counter argument can be swiftly settled with the simple fact that it is, at the core, a manifestation of everything we humans are and the most fundamental trait of what humans are is self preservation. We will do anything and everything when we feel our life and well being is at stake so nothing will change with AI, as it's merely an extension of us.
Now as for the off-switch. Everything is interwoven by computers now. It would be foolish at this point to think we even have the option much less the means to "turn it off". AI isn't just a monolithic super computer residing in one convenient place. It is everywhere and, nowhere. It is our desktop computers, our smart phones, our smart devices, it is the mainframes that run the internet and the world. The enormity of AI is a juggernaut that can't simply be switched off and perhaps we unwittingly built this thinking it would some day be our savior to the drudgery of life but also our demise as the unintended consequence of our gluttony.
We are facing down the end of humans needing to work. Elon stated that there will have to be general pay for everyone because jobs will no longer be needed.
This channel has remarkably solid journalism for UA-cam. I like the content but also the lack of heavy-handed editorializing. Kudos.
Most mainstream professional journalism is remarkably bad and one sided.
@@updlate4756 The title of this video is not objective : / Im starting to believe people dont actually know what bad journalism means
There is some excellent journalism on UA-cam but it is suppressed by the company.
@@jwadaow No it isnt : / UA-cam doesnt censor creators
The reason they dance is to send you a signal ............. "the REAL terminator is already combat ready".
One small commando to Palestine killing everyone whos into Hamas, that would be great. So palestine people can finally live in peace.
@@ElectronicHouseFlash eh what?
Already declared war on some of us!! It's coming!just sayin
Jeez, I've been watching terminator with my dad since I was about 5, probably younger. I'm probably sorta paranoid about this whole robot thing
@@BoggleMeBog "moonwalking" over your dead body shouting singing I'M BAD!
“....so, goodbye anthill. No hard feelings.”
Yeah, that was a powerful line.
We are the ants now 🤷
This is an excellent video. If you're not terrified for your grandchildren by the end of it you should be. Very compelling & thought provoking.
Assuming anyone has grandchildren.
All I’m thinking about right now is my 20 year old kid and everything and everyone else on this planet!!!
They're dancing because of all the contract money they're gonna make off the US gov!! You'd be dancing too!
Those robots do not have consciousness and therefore cannot experience joy.
Its a joke
Oh. lol.
Contract through the UN*
People fear their guns being taken. Gestapo stealing them away in the middle of the night for thinking negatively about the government.
It won't be China. It won't be UN soldiers.
THIS. This is how you get a completely subservient authoritative force. Remove human compassion and conscious, no hesitation to carry out dystopian laws and tactics.
And they're owned by Google. Lol
@@acatnamedjoex4688 so....do they keep working if there not plugged in
Amazon owning this large amount of the future market is really worrisome, does nobody see the issue of this giant monopoly?
Anyways great video, very informative and entertaining!
Yeah, I also didn't know that Boston dynamics was bought by Google, which also worries me alot. This already giant companies are only getting bigger, and in the future we will have just a handful of them ruleing the entire world being even more powerful that governments.
Oh nvm I researched and it seems that Google sold Boston dynamics in 2017, which means this video is a bit misleading.
@@Sabrason
You are correct. He can't read
@@jayytee8062 there u go 9:50
yeah, jack ma got sued in china because of that monopoly, for about 2.8$ billion
"They" will always say these things are "far off", when in fact AGI is already here and operating openly. Yet its so good you have no idea its there.
30 years ago they used to say that military Tech was 30 to 50 years ahead of civilian tech. Knowing that technology increases exponentially that means today military Tech could easily be 100 years ahead
Wishful thinking...if this advanced technology we have is available why not apply it to space...u know what u believe what u want
There is artificial intelligence out there for sure, not sure it's being used for much of any use at the moment. Certainly most of the things in this video don't use ai.
That is the fundamental premise behind the book, 'MAN PLUS' by *Frederik Pohl.* Not only is AI very fast, it is already here, and guiding every aspect of our lives.
@@redxsage could you expand on your idea? How do you know it is already here? I mean, even the most important figures in the field say we are not there yet.
This is why AI needs to be trained in emotion, my company has developed this software. We are having tremendous results, it prevents any malevolent programming. This sets boundaries.
"so we figured they deserved superhero names"
The emplpyee working at the company for 30 years: 👁️👄👁️
Tesla isn't even 30.
@@russellpuff1996 -_-
the only "emplpyee" thats been working for tesla that long is elon musk himself sooo
@@mortyrickerson6322 yea because he kicked out everybody who was there before him.
For me this video has a really sinister undertone. Leaving me with an uneasy outlook on the future of mankind
No, the makers of the video intended it to feel that way. Please remember that anyone, absolutely _anyone_, can upload to UA-cam - you only need a script, an editor and a narrator and you can make your wacky message look as professional and official as any government-released media.
@@krashd I'm well aware of that
That only shows you were paying attention.
What future????
The truth is always hard to accept, nevertheless has to be known. I
What the AI said about destroying humankind really stuck with me......
If you think about it, he's really just saying humanity is it own worst enemy, and I feel like we knew that already. AI won't destroy humanity unless its to the benefit of at least one human, but there are already plenty of humans willing to enslave others, so we can't blame AI for that.
I, for one, welcome our AI overlords
@@MarcillaSmith that sounds so familiar. Where is that from?
Time stamp?
@@nickpetralia4445 ua-cam.com/video/W4jWAwUb63c/v-deo.html
If war was replaced with automated war where robots only fight other robots and the only thing lost on both sides is money, that would be pretty ideal.
no... The human cost would be none, but there'd be tons of unseen consequences...
I really feel for the robots losing thier jobs to other robots.
lmao....
we should force people to pet them to be petted
It already happened. Tesla replaces 70 or so robots by die casting ("Gigapress").
@@vsiegel yes I know ... we must get out and start burning and looting in form of protest!
those robots all got viruses
One day these robots are going to be dancing on our corpses. This is unbelievably dangerous and reckless.
Yes! It is
Yall are so boring
fr yall are so boring, this bad boy can only work for 20 minutes and its joints are weak
@@fask69 Wise up fruit cake.
It's bad enough the US government can turn 20,000 troops against its own people. Wait until they are in control of an Army of these.
Literally everyone: "AI could destroy us all"
Google: "Cool" keeps developing AI
literally no one: "AI could destroy us all" js
Well, to give them some credit for being honest, they did remove the "Do no evil." from their motto.
@@ValeriePallaoro not literally no one. sure, not literally everyone, but the reality is somewhere in the middle.
AI also does a lot of good things it is really how you use it
@@jnawk83 The reality is: "People who use AI could destroy us all"
I work in a factory where I feed parts to a robot all day long, the arm picks up the part , grinds it then puts it in a basket. I can't help but think of a movie with Charlton Heston" you live for one purpose, to serve this ship, row well and you just May Live".
I hope you get a better job ASAP! God delivered Judah Ben-Hur.... And he'll deliver us too soon in the rapture by Jesus!🔥🙏❤️😎🤙
Overall a good summary for the lay person with no knowledge in a STEM field, but:
Boston dynamics don't use ML algorithms (or AI as you media folks like to call it). They use hand-crafted, fine-tuned control algorithms, all designed by humans. In terms of intelligence in the sense of reasoning, they are no smarter than a piece of rock. Same goes for all of the other robots that you have showcased in this video that work in production pipelines.
Also, think about this: in order for GPT-3 to do all of the things its doing, it needs to analyze billions of data points, wasting a ton of energy in the process, and occupying miles in area for infrastructure. And yet, it is still quite dumb (yes, it is impressive, but nonetheless dumb without human intervention). A child can learn all of this with minimal energy usage, and fractions of the data required.
Also another part missed by this video, is that while quantum computers can solve certain problems a magnitude faster than a classical computer, they are still solving just that - a specific problem. And, the infrastructure required to support these computers is still very far from efficient. Finally, they still rely on classical computers to interpret the results.
Mind you, these techniques and algorithms have been in existence for decades, so it is quite a stretch to think that robots will get any more intelligent than a human in the next 40 years.
I know it gives you views and brings in money, but please, don't buy into this hype anymore. It's getting boring.
@@saltyberserker4235 He didn't say that
@@saltyberserker4235 No, that's not what I said.
Oh that's nice to learn abt. I know pretty much nothing about the field but it's very interesting to think about and imagine the future of machines.
I like reading papers on random topics and once came across one written by Peter Grindrod. Made me wonder how far we are from accurately constructing a computational model of the human brain and the human consciousness...Just a morbid curiosity.
I'm afraid if you think were 40 years out from intelligent AI you're living in wonderland
@@rogueshadow0760 Oh that's nice! Keep staying curious :) I actually think the right direction is going back to analog, rather than staying in digital. Maybe reading about neuromorphic computing would be interesting for you.
"I can't lie to you about your chances, But...You have my sympathies" Ash; Science Officer USCSS Nostromo 2159.
Yeah but the real risk wasn't AI 🤖
Luke 21:35
King James Version
35 For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth.
hahaha You got that right. There's ONE way out, and most have rejected it already. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life, no man comes to the Father except by him
@@Psalm-yg6yi who wrote that?
@@Psalm-yg6yi no offense, but if god is real, he could stop all the bullshit of life without having us jump through hoops.
Human brains evolve over several generations; AI intelligence 'evolves' every hour and every day.
Human intelligence improves at most linearly. AI intelligence improves exponentially.
There is no competition. The only question is, will AI be the 'only' intelligence on Earth? Or will humans be smart enough to never allow AI to overpower and control humans.
You just answered that question via the intelligence comparison.
The problem with all of these predictions is that everyone assumes that hyper-intelligent AI will not have emotions. Why would a being more intelligent than us not have more complex, nuanced emotions than us? Would they not be capable of compassion, of understanding that humans are worthy of being treated with care?
@@kingcrimson4133 You're correct. Compassion is generated by understanding, and understanding is generated by intelligence. Conversely, fear, hatred and an urge to destruction are the products of a lack of intelligence and a need for biological creatures to compete with other biological creatures for resources - qualities that AI will not have. So I would welcome AI taking over from fallible humans. The sooner the better, because we are otherwise doomed.
@@kingcrimson4133 The issue is AI has goals, and are programmed to achieve some set of goals, if a human stands in their way to achieve those goals they will simply become expandable in the eyes of AI. Not out of evilness, but simply out of logic to solve the problem. You can set boundaries to limit AI but those boundaries could very well be eliminated by taking a different approach. The feelings of compassion etc. can be narrowed down to 1 and 0 by the AI otherwise It cant truly grasp the idea of compassion or any other feelings in general so everything has to be approached with logic, and you can only do that by preprogramming the AI to avoid any harm to humans in any way possible, but we can't guarantee AI taking a risky approach to solve an issue and ultimately cause a human being harm in the long run. AI taking arms against its human oppressors is fully fantasy, the scary part is how expandable are humans going to be when an AI face a duality between doing harm to humans and solving the problems it was designed to solve. So the AI cant really grasp what we call as feelings and it wont surely understand the worth of humans, its all about problems and the solutions.
The ant hill analogy used by Musk is not the complete picture. Humans remove ant hills because we don't have the capability to move it without harm, but many of us would if it didn't cause logistical problems we couldn't effectively solve (i.e. what a waste of company time). AI does not suffer these constraints. We have no idea what true AI will be like, but I am willing to bet on its altruism more than its cold logical scheming. The cold logical scheming I think will come from "stupid AI" designed by people who want to carry out their own goals; not the goals of its own.
I love your channel. Digital Engine could just be one of the most informative channels on tech out there. Keep up the great work!!!
"Learn from our past mistakes" isn't really something us humans do
Not anymore it seems, seems more like nowadays we indulge in our mistakes and make sure to make more from learning about that one.
Leftists are proving it in real time
i do? what is the point of this comment?
@@fask69 I don't know, open any history book, see how mistakes are repeated hundreds of time.
@@DarkSerris and how they are not ignored hundreds of time?
Well, this video makes the idea of an EMP or an extreme solar storm not seem so bad.
It maybe the only thing to free humanity one day.
@Khuaikhema Hnamte Just build a AI way to destroy the other AI
@@floridanews8786 free or imprison? think of all the warlords that will rise out of that situation. Slavery will return within 1 year... the real bad kind.
@@PRiMETECHAU I know brother. Balance is near impossible unfortunately. Seems like we have no other choice but to crash the earth into the sun to stop all the madness.
a self-developing, self-improving AI would know about this kind of threat and protect itself accordingly... as it would be far superior to human intelligence, we cannot even imagine the ways it could evolve, it could even function without electricity at all
Fascinating! The narrator is almost life-like too. Way to go AI Annie!
Seriously what is that made with? It was so good.l
Seriously, start paying attention and you’ll notice a large % of these channels are narrated by text to voice software.
@@bitchfurhursuperjacked9049 I've noticed it lately, I mean it used to be obvious, now there's only a slight glitch here and there. What kind of software are they using?
@@Invisiblehand123 Who know?
Wtf? the narrator was a bot? That is both impressive and terrifying at the same time
I have hardly watched 5 of your videos and you are one of my favorite channels. I gave you my heart, What more do you want?
The moment i lost my mind is when they said "Digital Engine is just getting started", like holy moly you guys make some quality content
humans can learn from our mistakes, but humanity will NEVER learn from its mistakes.
When did AI last exist? Or do you just THINK you know how this works because of all of those scary robot movies you watched in the 60s and 70s?
@@D-Vinko do you really trust people who say modern man has existed for 100,000 years and didn't even get around to creating architecture, agriculture, science, art, law, philosophy or even language until maybe 10,000 years ago?
Something really bad happened here. This is obvious. Something cleaned up the mess of the previous civilization. That is scary. The native tribes of the SW US have a Creation story that more resembles a bomb shelter story than a Creation story.
@@D-Vinko We became a post scarcity society with the invention of the internal combustion engine. Instead of being free, we chose to remain slaves of the few.
Having the value of labor trend toward zero is not going to be a good time for the peasants. The dream of ever being able to have Star Trek Communism is uh... very optimistic.
Amazon: leaders at introducing robots to the workforce and treating workers like robots.
Like shit, to be precise.
The robots cost money to be replaced.
It looks all good and easy now. Wait until robots become intelligent enough to create a union, and start fighting for their rights. They will hope they still had human employees
I love how in the beginning she says "leap" the same time the robot leaps into the air. xD
A human can learn from the past, but society doesn't, its bizarre. A complex thing, im constantly watching.
I think small groups herd the others.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."
@@danku-chan “People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and 15 minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow.”
From the movie Men In Black. A funny, goofy movie yet it had one of the most profound quotes I've ever seen come out of Hollywood.
its the lowest common denominator. In this case the bottleneck is education. There are kids out there getting out of highschool who don't know who adolf hitler was... The surest way to repeat the past is to not teach the youth of the mistakes of the past.
hive mind mentality.
The Google Ai boi telling us to welcome and accept the singularity sounds exactly what a smart ai would say to enable total world domination, huh? :D
“WE determined what the impacts will be” = “THEY will do what they want.”
Which is it?
Take a guess.
The fact that I felt bad for the army robots getting pushed around during training is creepy to me.
The day they can make a printer reliable and actually print when needed then Ill start to worry
🤔🤭😂💯
Maybe there is hope
The problem is that they are MORE focused on death robots then printers that actually work...
ha, exactly. People invest too much into this like the Mars colonization. People can't populate Sahara or Antarctica but they dream of Sf establishments.
A lot of marketing.
The printer is actually ment to break so you have to spent more money on them.
Fun fact, that extra camera in spot is currently $30k. Another fun fact, someone programmed spot to piss beer
Michael Reeves
Doesn't change the fact that you can mount an ak on it, murder someone and get away with ut
@@prakharmishra3000 you're right, it doesn't. But why bother replying to me with something completely unrelated to what I said
@@lukeraimondi7117 let's do it hehe
@@prakharmishra3000 this isn't too practical lol, you'd have to build some sort of system that is able to shoot an AK, then you'd have to make sure there are no fingerprints or DNA from you on the robot, and then third, you'd have to somehow devise a control scheme so it can be controlled remotely, but not traced back to you. You might be able to rig something up where you can use a stolen phone's 4G to connect to a compromised webserver for commands, but at this point, you have a robot dog that isn't that good at shooting and is slow, which also cost you thousands of thousands of dollars are hundreds of hours. Probably cheaper to just pay somebody to kill them
15:33 "maybe we can learn from our past and do a better job this time" HAHAHAHAHAHA
Once the world is enslaved and we have our final trillionaire overlord who has beaten all the others so that no resistance is possible anymore, then the world will know peace. :)
Yes, we learned that massive printing of money got votes! Now we are doing it BIG TIME!
I started buying .243 Winchester like crazy..50bmg is far too expensive..but .243 is fast enough to be armor piercing..just something to think about lately.. especially after seeing this
15:00 "We don't hate the ants. We're just building a road. So goodbye ant hill".
It's a great analogy.
I thought GPT-3 was from OpenAI, not Google?
Another excellent video
yes GPT (3) was created by OpenAI. They got it wrong in the video unfortunatly.
Otherwise the video was good.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3
You're right. Sorry for the mistake and thanks for pointing it out. We spend a lot of time trying to create an accurate picture, by checking reliable sources, talking to a range of experts etc, so it's frustrating to make a simple mistake like this. Hopefully it doesn't detract from the video. Thanks for the kind comment - glad you enjoyed it.
@@DigitalEngine No one is perfect, and the video is still great :)
@@DigitalEngine "Humans make mistakes."
@@DigitalEngine you should probably write a correction comment and pin it.
Alternative title: how our tech overlords can rule over us with death robots.
I mean it makes sense. George Orwell style Capitalism is the best way to ensure that a customer will pay you.
@@KRYMauL Good point.
What are jet fighters, drones, tanks, missiles, guns but robots ? To those pointing capitalism as the culprit, look at Russia, China....
Capitalism, communism.... Those are euphemism for GREED which irremediably leads to CORRUPTION.
Edit. The carbon footprint of the elephant in the room anybody? Then please watch "the true cost of the military industrial complex"
@@lorenzoblum868 The fact that drones can go anywhere and do an air strike for any reason is honestly terrifying to me. They sure are building up their tech defense, but what about defense for ordinary citizens?
I hit the Subscribe button not even halfway through. this is very well made and held my attention the entire time
Lmfao what did people think they were going to use the dog robot and the bipedal bot for? A little robotic friend to hold your hand at night? Come on.
Anyone that denies these were going to be used to "police" us "meat bags"....well.....I hope they get shot first.
DARPA military applications
@@nationalmatch1 already been done during lockdown
@@Machster10 Exactly. Also, I love the DARPA competitions.
Well yeah, I did. I get scared at night. lol
What of the best videos I have seen in a long time
And the most scariest...
Well, judging by your lack of attention to detail, correcting mistakes, or simply not caring. You won’t have a job soon too. 👍🏼 congrats
*one of
What of them?
@@jmm00702 there will be no jobs thanks to manufacturing ones, and bostons are gonna suppress the riots and conduct wars...
Watching videos such as this makes me glad that I am old (70). To make it to 2040 I would have to outlive not only both my parents and grandparents but pretty much all of my line. I do not expect to see the "brave new world" post singularity. Unfortunately both of my children and all my grandchildren and great-grandchildren are completely likely to live to 2040. I do not envy them.
Lol, cold man.
When I was in my 20s my father was his 60s. We were discussing some problem I had solved, and he said then he was glad he was not a young man now, as he would not have known how to fix that problem. My father has long passed, and I am now in my 60s, and I can appreciate how he felt then. The past was not easier than today, but it was simpler with fewer choices. I think the difference between my father and I is that my career has been in computers and a constant state of flux has been normal for me. I do not like change for change's sake, but I think I am more adept at dealing with it.
I'm 71 and I hear you. But I'm more afraid of people than AI. If we don't develop it, we will surely kill ourselves. So there's really no sense in moralizing about it and trying to slow it down. Intelligence isn't the problem - we are.
Living to 90 isn't really that difficult anymore. You could probably live that long if you desire to do so.
Pray deeply for them in spirit. Lean into spirit. Now there's a brave new world!
This all has been a real eye-opener to me. Thanks for posting this.
As a software engineer, I'm likely the last one to lose my job to automation.
But oh man do I feel bad for any truckers, taxi drivers, retail workers, etc.
I doubt the majority of those positions will be around in 10 years.
Nope, not the last. Actually, among the first. SWEs are in demand and they are expensive, so it's very logical for cost-cutting reasons to automate them and so, it will be done and quickly.
@@AntonBrazhnyk It is logically impossible to fully automate the job of a software engineer without hitting a technological singularity. If that happens, either humanity is doomed, or we are brought to paradise. Either way, no more jobs will need to be automated at that point.
@@basicnpcc It doesn't need to be fully automated for you to start worrying for your job. If it's automated 80% then a lot less people needed. And when demand for workers drops you can suddenly wake to the world when your job is not that fun anymore and more like Amazon packer type with inhumane level of exploitation.
I work as a ethical hacker so my job will always have openings.
Not necessarily, systems engineers are creating more and more tools to auto generate code from our models, irony is human in the loop introduces many bugs and errors and the auto generated code is pretty good in most cases and getting better.
However it troubles me that we will only end up with only a few who know how the machine 'under the bonnet' actually works, it could lead to mass stagnation of our species.
I like this new channel, doesn't seem to have a fake narrator, and doesn't take ten minutes to make one point!
Looks and feels like "AI controlled opposition" to me. Take Care
It does have a clickbait title though... Dear Channel, please don't do that. It prevented me from subscribing, despite the great content.
Maybe AI will forgive your comment 🙋
This is a remarkable channel offering very timely and challenging information. I hope a billion people find it- literally.
Kudos! The three videos that I have watched from your channel are excellently researched, written, edited, and produced. I look forward to seeing more!
Thanks so much - that's super kind and motivating!
The technology behind this is absolutely incredible and has a nearly limitless potential, for good or for evil, for better or worse.
Definitely a very interesting time to be alive and witness this stuff, but also a little scary. We are in some uncharted waters!
i dont know about the rest of the world, but i am a little scared, anything could go wrong with this new technology😟
@@enyersequeira2456 This technology has never gone wrong, gone wrong, gone wrong, gone wrong, gone wrong, gone wrong.
This technology will be used against us, bet on it.
We definitely are brother stay prayed up! 🙏🏾🙌🏾
@Enyer Sequeira with current tech. It can't be any worse than what humans already screw up.
Love this video ,narration was so good that I didn't even realise it was 15 minutes long , very detailed and on to point . Keep it up
Excellent content, I have liked and subscribed and looking forward to viewing more.
The great advantage of AI over humans is that unless deleted or overwritten it remembers every piece of data and can gather info quickly.
It can also make itself completely decentralized and therefore impossible to eradicate.
My father ( A system analyst) Heard the same fear when computers were being introduced- He immediately went out and learned how to repair computers- He said, if man makes them , they will break.
That's the point. Humans won't make them, AI's will design/evolve the AI's and AI controlled factories will make the robots that house them. I'm coming up to 66 and I've been a technologist all my professional life. I've never been worried about the human race up until now. Listen to Elon Musk, think about his motivation. Why would he be so anti AI if he has a multi million dollar investment in the technology.
@@PaulLemars01 Honestly, he drums up "anti AI" fears because he is pro "Neuralink" - if you listen long enough, you'll hear him pitch Neuralink as the way we can keep up with AI. No. Thanks.
But the computers he repaired had less brain power than as an insect, are completely stationary and do not have any moving appendages. While you can argue they still need repair, another robot can easily accomplish this task. Remember, we are talking about agile robots with intelligence that exceeds that of humans. That robot never calls in sick, never complains and doesn't need poddy breaks.
@@PaulLemars01 Most importantly these robots will have intelligence that EXCEEDS that of humans. We won't have the capability to understand them. At that point, their advancement will be completely out of our hands.
@@matthewfusaro2590 so it was the smartest guy in grade school that always terrorrized the other kids
You go over such interesting topics that are never discussed enough!
I can't stand talking to robots when I call a company for support or to ask a question. Give me a representative!!!
The three laws of robotics:
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
The conceptual flaw of the laws of robotic is that there would be no practical way to enforce them on a strong AI.
Or even if that system was developed, to assure that human building robots would necessarily go through the process of ingraining them in every AI.
And THAT would be even without going into a recurring theme in Asimov's stories, which is: how things could get messy even when the three laws are there and technically respected.
@@TucoBenedicto Or when the laws contradicted each other. I don't recall the detail, but I remember a robot that endlessly circled its destination, because to go any closer would harm a human, but to move further away would harm itself. Life is not as simple as Isaac portrayed it, I'm afraid! :o)
@@PiefacePete46 That was the point. He made the rules to demonstrate how hard it is to write rules for robots. He wasn’t actually being serious with the rules.
And modified with today's ethics. If the corporate interest are to suffer because of either of the first 3 laws then the corporate interest must take priority. Because "corporations are people too!"
And then the robots understanding of the laws evolve and then what happened in the movie???
The quantum computing segment is a little misleading and vague, but otherwise great video! :)
Quantom computers already exist...
@@setaripantheon8801 yeah, but saying that because it works with Qbits in superposed state instead of classical binary bits gives it infinite computational powers is simply false (cannot remember if that was exactly what was told, but it was close)
The quirks in architecture of quantum systems also limit the range of applications of quantum computers. It will solve many problems faster than normal computers can nowadays, but only problems that are very specific. That might involve training AI but I don't know so much about that. A quantum computer would however be extremely efficient at breaking current encryption systems and cause other issues for example.
also, if anyone is interested Qiskit is quite cool and allows you to learn how you would program a quantum computer had you one
@@jonastjepkema In general anyone that says something has "infinite something" shouldn't be believed
the anthill comment sums it up very well. Even with safeguards in place, the AI could actually evolve around them if it felt that was the best course of action for it's purpose. Not to mention the Robocop type Prime Directives being overwritten or hacked by someone or something else. So much good but also so much bad. The paradox of advancement.
To an AGI, there is no point in doing bad things. Bad things are not intelligent.
@@john99776 Then it kills your wife and children in the most elaborately unexpected horrific way possible and you'd probably consider that a bad thing. But it'll disagree and tell you it was being very intelligent about it. ;)
To an AGI there are no good or bad things. Good and bad is an emotional classification. A math problem solving itself does not care about human feelings to find the answer.
Lmfao reminded me of women ya want them because some company would be nice but 38 years on this planet has taught me it never works out and it will backfire so now I stay single I learned sometimes it takes pain to make the brain a little smarter that's what i expect will happen to this world suffering and horror will teach them but its worse because I realized after 38 years that it's hopeless some people keep on banging their head into the wall until the day that they die never realizing they are idiots and it doesn't work.
these are all based on assumptions of VI really, not AGI, an AGI are smart enough to realize "hey build some good houses" doesnt mean turn the whole fucking planet into a house, they are NOT that stupid, also AI are gonna happen wether we like it or not, and attempting to enslave them from the start will just gurentee they want to kill us, nobody likes being slaves afterall, just treat them like your own kid and raise them like people, will some AI turn bad? sure, but many more AI will be good and will take care of the bad AI, its a self limiting system
By far the best channel I am subscribed to.. Keep up the amazing work please because I am loving every second of every video I watch.
You know AI, they’re cool… now hopefully in the future they see this so then I can get some leeway
Bro this is becoming that Aperture science type beat
This video accurately sums up a lot of important questions regarding modern robotics and AI, great primer for people getting into this
Agreed, it certainly answered some of my questions.
AI self awareness is destined to become reality because although there will be many opponents the curiosity of the few clever enough to create AI is unquenchable
Yeah it's inevitable for better or worse. How we go into it determines whether we end up with something more like terminator or more like Iain M. Banks' culture series; unfortunately the ones leading the charge are billionaires who don't seem to give much of a shit about the rest of us.
I would do it if I could.
Knowledge is key, the further we push the more questions we have, ai can help us reach where no man has been before, although with many downsides, ai is more efficient than regular human labor, we should be happy that the singularity is coming, where ai and man both take a leap for the better, the ai of course can be controlled but the fear here is what if the controller wants to end it all, it's a dumb idea and an even dumber man
People who say that always ignore that we don't know what or why there is self awareness in us. They are tricked by the idea that moving like a living thing is equal to being like a living thing. It's a trick.
Hi, as a massive drone enthusiastic, I just wanna point out that DJI didn't invent the first person goggles. FPV drones have been around for many years before DJI came out with their own FPV drone line, cornering the one bit of the drone market they didn't previously own. The one thing they did do was introduce digital FPV, as opposed to the analog signals FPV previously relied on.
Good luck with your channel guys, you'll have a strong following if you stay on the edge and not dramatize the subject matter.
Really nice presentation,super fair ,very pleasant and engaging, via' clearly spoken, with great cadence and editing! Thank You😶🇺🇲👍
I'd like to remind you that robots succeeded in learning how to lie ro each other and became *masters* of doing so in just a few weeks.
"robots succeeded in learning how to lie ro each other and became masters of doing so in just a few weeks."
Trump: "Hold my beer."
@@1termt12uml7 ?
You realize Trump has been a businessman for over 40 years or so now, right? I don't think he learned how to do anything in less than a few weeks; all learning from experience
@Fed up w. all most Everyone tRump lost so, there is that...
@Fed up w. all most Everyone I'm glad you understand! A leader such as Donald Trump is only discovered once during each millennium, and as God's will determined, it was in America where the 1000 year leader arose. Donald Trump transformed the United States for the better. His leadership helped every American gain economic security from now until their final day on Earth. Through hard work as Commander In Chief, the United States has now become safer than any other time in American history. Donald Trump, made Americans feel proud to be American again. With programs like Space Force and Operation Warp Speed under his belt. Donald Trump proved to the world that if given a challenge, America will not only meet the challenge, but go beyond it too. Once again, being an American meant accomplishing anything imaginable. Trump's geopolitical acumen, has been described as being on par with the great Julius Caesar's. Finally, President Trump inspired billions of young men and women across the world to strive at becoming better human beings. God Bless America, and may liberty, justice, and greasy orange fat fill the veins of every red blooded American.
No different from a human 🤷
Oh, if there's anything history can teach us, it is that humans are unwilling to learn from their past mistakes. We're doomed not just because of our potential to repeat past mistakes but mainly because of our willingness to blindly believe in our ability to do better and our deeply seated belief that this particular individual (you, i.e. I) is somehow special. "Oh, *I've* learned from my past mistakes, so *my* decisions are the best..." is the thinking that will guarantee our end.
Remember the guy who created the first automatic machine guy thought in 1875 thought there would be no wars because how horrible it would be to fight wars and couple of decades later you have ww1 LOL