If Secondary shear force of rivet no. 1 & 2 is higher than that of rivet no. 3 & 4 and angle of these rivets is also more than 90 degree as compared to angle at rivet no. 3 & 4, then which rivets should be considered critical?
I think ,secondary forces should cause an opposing moment to the moment generated by ecentric loading. But you have taken it you have taken their directions to cause moment in same direction as that of moment caused by load. It does not satisfy moment equilibrium about centroid. Could you please explain ?
Also the direction of forces acting on rivets should be opposite to the load directions. By your method answer will be correct but directions are opposite I guess. Kindly check
ありがとうスニル先生日本から。thank you sir from japan
Very nicely explained!! Made it soo simple! Keep posting such videos!
Sir it's very awesome..
I have problem to take F' .bUt now it's clear
. thanks a lot sir✌✌✌✌
Zabardast , very nicely explained
how do we deal with combined loading in such case, assume we have an axis load in the x-direction?
Great explanation sir👍🏽
Excellent @
Thank u sir simple explanation
Sir it's wonder full
Best explanation.
Thank you sir now I understand this topic
If Secondary shear force of rivet no. 1 & 2 is higher than that of rivet no. 3 & 4 and angle of these rivets is also more than 90 degree as compared to angle at rivet no. 3 & 4, then which rivets should be considered critical?
I had discussed short method
In general find resultant force at each rivet using law of parallelogram and confirm highest load
@@sunilmohodmh31 thanks Sir.
best explanation
sir, how can it be a torque. torque is rotation of an object about its axis.!this is moment right? Please clarify my doubt
I think ,secondary forces should cause an opposing moment to the moment generated by ecentric loading. But you have taken it you have taken their directions to cause moment in same direction as that of moment caused by load. It does not satisfy moment equilibrium about centroid. Could you please explain ?
Also the direction of forces acting on rivets should be opposite to the load directions. By your method answer will be correct but directions are opposite I guess. Kindly check
secondary forces are the reason the moment is caused that is why their direction is taken the same
Yeah ,since sir has followed same notation for both primary n secondary it won't be a problem ...
Which software you have used for this video, writing tab?? Please tell me.
@sunil mohod
great video... sir.. thanks
Perfect. Thanks Sir 🙏
why secondary forces are proportional to length
Same doubt
why they are proportional ?/
very nice explained 👌
sir can you make a whole video of machine design.. because all are liking the video
Nicely explained
Wonderful sir. Thank you so much
Awesome writing, which pen tablet do you use?
Thanks i ball tabled pad
nice explanation.
Nice sir
Which software have you used for teaching ?
thank you very much for the explanation i found f as 0.1kn instead of 5kn did i make a mistake ?
pl give at what time in video you have doubt
as M= F×D , force and distance r inversely proportional noooooo sir
How did you took F1' as 5KN
i got 0.1
How to find angle ?
amazing .
thnxx a lot sir...keep itup
nice video sir
Thanks sir
Sir Thanks a lot
18:20 se samajh nhi Aya sir
no secondary force in midle rvet
Thanks a lot of sir
gajab
thank you sir .....
thnks dr alot
Thank you sir
Volume clear nhi h
you can watch alternate video GATE eccentric loading
PAYTM 9422112581 UPI "9422112581@UPI" donate kro
thnks sir
Low noice quality
sound quality poor
but lect. is good
raj singh are u listening music or something here
why secondary forces are proportional to length
Force is a vector with its magnitude represented by the length.
Thanks sir