Intro To FreeCAD Assembly Workbench

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 78

  • @56redgreen
    @56redgreen 10 днів тому +3

    I am new to Freecad and been watching a few from different people. You are definitely the best.

  • @kenschweim6159
    @kenschweim6159 Місяць тому +10

    I would vote this video as your best one to date! Everything I design requires assembly and this workbench looks like it will be one of my favorites.

  • @Foggy3657
    @Foggy3657 Місяць тому +10

    Just adding my thanks for these videos. You are a great teacher. You mentioned that you use FreeCAD for woodworking projects. It would be great if you could do a video on say a cabinet or a book case. Best wishes.

  • @Ed_Downunder
    @Ed_Downunder Місяць тому +5

    Congrats again, your videos are opening up opportunities for people, myself included. We can all see the potential, and that is why we persist, your video adds a practical solution to workflows. My design intentions are now gaining clarity.

  • @jeffholloway8345
    @jeffholloway8345 Місяць тому +3

    I just want to add my voice to the choir: thanks for a great series! This is my first attempt at CAD and if I'm ever going to learn it, it will be thanks to this excellent foundation.

  • @GlassCanvas
    @GlassCanvas 25 днів тому +3

    Thank you very much. This is an excellent and practical lesson with the new FreeCad 1.0 assembly module

  • @jonathanrichards593
    @jonathanrichards593 Місяць тому +2

    That seems so much easier than my stumbling attempts with Assembly4 many months ago. I'm going to explore!

  • @DonovanBrown
    @DonovanBrown Місяць тому +3

    This was a very valuable video. 1.0 is really nice. Thanks for the videos.

  • @sidnzrael2433
    @sidnzrael2433 День тому +1

    Great Vid. Many thanks for your time.

  • @agroturystykadworwgajlitac6195
    @agroturystykadworwgajlitac6195 20 днів тому +2

    Great video. It would be fantastic if you added an episode on making technical drawings and their cross-sections from assemblies.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  20 днів тому +1

      I might do that next.

    • @goodwill7643
      @goodwill7643 9 днів тому +1

      ​@@Adventuresincreation yes, Technical drawing is a good topic. Helps to do scaled print on a papter or carton, so you can measure parts before put it into CNC or 3D printer.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  8 днів тому +1

      @@goodwill7643 I don't have a printer big enough for scaled drawings of most things I design but you can do that for smaller stuff.

    • @goodwill7643
      @goodwill7643 8 днів тому +1

      @@Adventuresincreation agree, but in some cases, you need precision in specific units, not a hole part. For example you have 10cm PCB and want to check mounting holes. Box itself doesn't matter, but buttons, LEDs, Displays should match together. So you can print specific sketch and make sure if any adjustments are needed.
      I mean this could be interesing topic for your channel which often googled on internet.
      And if you going to do such video, then small tip. KiCAD allows to export PCB as a step file, which you can import to FeeCAD. Very handy feature.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  8 днів тому +1

      @@goodwill7643 Good point, that probably works well.

  • @LuizEnger
    @LuizEnger Місяць тому +2

    Super insightful, thanks a lot for the video!

  • @matthewbennett
    @matthewbennett Місяць тому +3

    Great videos! 🎉

  • @SuperLittlewillies
    @SuperLittlewillies Місяць тому +2

    Thank you for these videos they are a great help in my learning curve

  • @marcianodejupiter
    @marcianodejupiter Місяць тому +1

    Really good! I hope you keep doing the others assembly tools too! 👍

  • @electronicsafrica
    @electronicsafrica Місяць тому +2

    Thank you for sharing ❤

  • @philchadwick9470
    @philchadwick9470 Місяць тому +3

    At 17:38, you can see that the fixed joint has pulled the pin and sunk the right hand side of your bracket into the base.

  • @gryzman
    @gryzman Місяць тому +1

    love your videos, thank you for making these

  • @arcode_channel
    @arcode_channel 17 днів тому +1

    Thanks a lot!

  • @rodneysmith1750
    @rodneysmith1750 Місяць тому +1

    This was a fun video today. At first, I was not interested in this particular area so I skipped the video for a bit, but I got curious and watched. You did a great job of showing and describing the process which I appreciate. I still don't know how I would use this feature, but now I have an understanding of what it does. My favorite part would be the exploded view and bill of materials, they are a pain to create manually.

  • @tomthompson7400
    @tomthompson7400 Місяць тому +1

    Im loving this bracket ,,,

  • @brankelly1921
    @brankelly1921 29 днів тому +1

    Thanks so much for this video, liked and subbed. Just a question, is there a replace/substitute face command like in solidworks? Can’t seem to find it anywhere.
    I mean if I create a complex surface and want to replace a solid’s face with that. Much appreciated,cheers !

  • @elokjerside8680
    @elokjerside8680 Місяць тому +2

    Great video----What about weight and materiale of each part in the BOM?

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому +1

      I think they would be manual adds.

    • @0LoneTech
      @0LoneTech Місяць тому +2

      You can assign materials with the Material command, allowing Python to access e.g:
      weight = FreeCAD.Units.Quantity(obj.Shape.Volume, FreeCAD.Units.Volume) * FreeCAD.Units.parseQuantity(obj.ShapeMaterial.Properties['Density'])
      This could be used in a macro to fill in a weight column. I don't think Assembly CreateBom has a feature to describe new columns, though. I also think expressions (like in spreadsheet) can't do indirect object lookups via names in other fields. Material seems more meant for the FEM system, but we can improve it.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому +1

      @@0LoneTech Thanks for the tip, I will give that a try and see if I can get it to show up in the BOM. - I'll let you know.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому +1

      @@0LoneTech I think you are right, I could not access these attributes from the spreadsheet or the bom directly. It would have to be a separate macro that populates the spreadsheet. It's definitely food for thought.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому +1

      @@0LoneTech OK, a little further investigation and I could access Area and Volume directly in the BOM but the density proved more tricky. The method __getitem__ does not appear to be accessible in the BOM directly so I had to use the python console (or a Macro) to read the item from the ShapeMaterial.properties dictionary for density. I could populate a spreadsheet cell with the entire dictionary but could not index one item using FacePlate.ShapeMaterial.Properties.__getitem__('Density') - There is definitely a lot of potential there.

  • @davidch3085
    @davidch3085 Місяць тому +2

    Could Freecad 1.0 assembly workbench be used to update an older Freecad A2+ workbench assembly?

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому +2

      I don't think that would work but, great practice to recreate it.

  • @bmndjd
    @bmndjd Місяць тому +1

    Excellent tutorial, thank you. Maybe I would figure it out by experimenting, but let’s say your top plate has some clearance built in so it slides without binding. You wouldn’t assemble it as you did with the two edges touching. If, for example, you wanted to assemble a dovetail joint that has a bit of clearance on all surfaces. Is there a way to center out the male part in the female space?

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому +1

      There is a distance joint that you could use. Especially if you are looking to confirm fit and clearance.

  • @to.l.2469
    @to.l.2469 10 днів тому +1

    What I noticed is that the videos on the playlist are not in the usual order, but in reverse. (The newest is currently at the top. Normally the "oldest," (the "introductory video" for the playlist), is at the top and the newest at the bottom)

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  9 днів тому +1

      Someone else said that too however, I can't change that. I checked and it showed they should be in the playlist in the order they were added. I am sure it's something to do with UA-cam.

    • @to.l.2469
      @to.l.2469 8 днів тому +1

      @@Adventuresincreation I don't know if there is a difference with public playlists. In my private playlist I can change the order like this:
      - Click on the playlist under the "Playlists" tab
      - Click on the playlist caption to switch to the detailed view of the playlist..
      - Set an order using "Sort". With "Manual" you can change the position of the titles using drag & drop, for example.
      ( the actual names of the buttons may vary in English, because I used the direct translation from German)

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  8 днів тому +1

      @@to.l.2469 It's a bit different in the UA-cam studio but I found a but that let me reverse the order, take a look and see if it changed for you.

    • @to.l.2469
      @to.l.2469 8 днів тому +1

      @@Adventuresincreation Yes, it worked perfectly. Thank you!

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  8 днів тому

      @@to.l.2469 Glad it worked for you.

  • @guillaumevincent716
    @guillaumevincent716 29 днів тому +1

    When it says «do you want to ground the first part automatically» , does freecad position the part at the origin ?

  • @TheREALDocRabbit
    @TheREALDocRabbit Місяць тому +1

    Did you try affixing the brackets using a revolute on the first hole and a fixed on the second hole. This seems logically that it would be the proper way to assemble those two parts.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому

      I did but it didn't work the way I would have expected. It's definitely something to play with.

  • @guillaumevincent716
    @guillaumevincent716 29 днів тому +1

    Instead of rotating by 90 deg when you did the firts joint, could you have made a second fix joint to mate second hole. Is there a function that makes co axial type of mate ? I think the big L shaped legs could have been made with a coincident mate and two coaxial mate ( one for each hole). I will try to see if assembly workbench has a coaxial function.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  29 днів тому

      There are lots of different joints. I thought, like you a second fixed joint would align it but it didn't. There is a coaxial joint and a distance joint. I tried to demo both. I would have just used fixed joints for all of them in practice.

    • @guillaumevincent716
      @guillaumevincent716 29 днів тому +1

      @@Adventuresincreation i belive its preferable to use two coaxial joint because if it doesnt work it means that the connexion is impossible therefore the distance between the holes on one of the part mated is wrong (not the same).mating one ole and turning 90 deg will always work even if there is a mistake in the design.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  26 днів тому +1

      @@guillaumevincent716 I understand your point but the joints don't always work that way.

    • @guillaumevincent716
      @guillaumevincent716 26 днів тому +1

      @@Adventuresincreation Maybe you should try the a2plus workbench, it has all the types of mates that you may need including stable co axial type of mate.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  25 днів тому

      @@guillaumevincent716 I have tried and made the video LOL. - I am trying to work with 1.0 and the included assembly workbench as that is the where the developement effort is being focused.

  • @maks223
    @maks223 Місяць тому +1

    I wonder if there is a way to create new part during assembly (for example to adjust new part for existing one).
    In Autodesk Inventor is the best I know - you create new part and you can cast geometry from other parts to new part sketches. Then design process is much easier, at least for me.

    • @Adventuresincreation
      @Adventuresincreation  Місяць тому

      Yes, it's quite easy to do. You can literally switch the referenced part. I almost showed that but the video was too long.

  • @konradrosenkranz6814
    @konradrosenkranz6814 6 днів тому +1

    Hello, the middle piece is incorrectly placed.