Good catch on the errors! Also, 35:40, as indicated by the name, I too was unconscious of this law and had been using it for computing expectations of functions of random variables
At page 97 para 2 it is said that a_N has form sigma^2/N. But while substituting 2.136 into 2.135 we're replacing a_(N-1) by sigma^2/N. How is this allowed? Am I missing something?
Again an incredible video. Really great to see someone going through this material.
Good catch on the errors! Also, 35:40, as indicated by the name, I too was unconscious of this law and had been using it for computing expectations of functions of random variables
At page 97 para 2 it is said that a_N has form sigma^2/N. But while substituting 2.136 into 2.135 we're replacing a_(N-1) by sigma^2/N. How is this allowed? Am I missing something?
I think you are right - the line on page 97 should say “a_(N-1) has the form sigma^2/N”, not a_N.
If we flip the curve then sign of steps can be positive and no change would be needed, I think…
That's right - if we flip the condition on f after eq. 2.128 in the online version, then the remaining steps look correct.
Bro please start chapter 3.
As soon as we finish Chapter 2 :)
@@sinatootoonian9129 Please complete the whole book as soon as possible.
@@sinatootoonian9129 Please upload one video every day.