@@ArturoMarin27 well they already have Bismarck. So if they added a modernized old ship I'd bet Scharnhorst or maybe Gneisenau, depends. Wouldn't mind them adding in a British BB though, like a modernized Vanguard.
This is better, these types of ships should be limited in some way, if they were free the games would be full of 10 of these. By selling them they limit their active units to only those that would like to pay them
as a World of Warships player who have a bunch of T10 the BB in WoWs is considered a hardest Class to play among the Surface Gun Ship and in WoWs you play like 12vs12 and that the reason you can have like 6-7 BB in match per team in MW we only play 5v5 and trust me you dont want to have useless BB Teammate in your team for sure not everyone can play BB and not to mention that plane in MW is so strong
Op ships and equipment must be limited either in gacha or bundle wall. I don't want a match full of these op ships. Imagine 4 teton delete a single destroyer immediately at start of battle
@wahyuwirawan727 i once did that in Tandem with 2 Teton and yes you just delete Enemy in on punch and i still have a video of it ua-cam.com/video/LrbjWIrt29c/v-deo.htmlsi=lCJWxakQf1JhifTJ
@@wahyuwirawan727Ridiculous reasoning. If that's the problem then limit the battleship presence by filtering them in the matchmaking system. Just like what they already did to aircraft carrier, and submarine. And i think we all know the REAL reason why battleships are locked behind paywall.
Its has own manuerable ability by not doing acceleration. Its interesting but its has slow moving so be prepare for incoming attack. But it again. Its still amazing.
@@sovit1308 Depends on how you like to play. Yamato Aegis, Teton or the Chinese one if you like incredibly hard-hitting main guns. Teton is also pretty versatile with torps, missiles and grenade launchers and a strong locked AA. Isakov if you want a very versatile battleship with lots of options for weapons and air defense and the ability to go 20 knots. Bismarck if you want something in the middle with good guns, speed, and versatility. New Hampshire if you wanna go missiles+guns, and Moscow if you want to be a no-fly zone for aircraft with lots of AA/Autocannon slots. If you hate submarines, then Teton and Isakov are your best options.
@AgentFrosty thanks brother I'm more like a cannon player ..I love cannons so as yamato aegis price is 17k it's high .. so I have teton and hauqing but can't decide as teton has more powerful cannon damage plus missile and torpedo but hauqing has more health cannon damage good Granade launcher good air defence is good than teton I guess so this two are making me hard to choice
@@sovit1308 Huaqing is probably the best if you wanna go all-ballistic. It's AA isn't that good though IMO, I think the Teton's is better from my experience. Teton does give you missiles and torps on top of the cannons. They're both slow and sluggish. Just comes down to how you want to play. I like the versatility of Teton better than the Huaqing.
Battelships should change course without acceleration ...and this battleship should have a grenade launcer instead of torpedos..that just destroyes the whole point of a battleship !!
Time and technological advancement are what destroyed the point of a battleship. Throughout history none, or almost no battleships were equipped with grenade launchers, however many battleships were equipped with torpedoes. Battleships were also not changing their heading while sitting still, that is just nonsense all in itself. USS Montana was 281 meters long and more than 64 million kilograms in weight, more than 72 million kilograms if it's loaded and ready for combat.. good luck spinning that around at a full stop.
I would be more concerned about Submarines especially getting too close to me and knowing I have torpedoes means I can do whatever damage to them as they've done to me
@@SirSmokieS then which battleship has torpedos ? Tell me isn't bullshit to have that and helicopter too ...but its a virtual game ... don't try to lecture me
@@fridaynight3181 They can in-game. All the modernized ones except maybe Moscow iirc can do it. I know for sure that Teton, New Hampshire, Isakov, Bismarck can because I play those regularly and they can all turn in place.
@@fridaynight3181 Montana and Richelieu are hypothetical modernized battleships like Yamato Aegis and Bismarck that are already in the game. So yes they can turn without moving.
@@Azizah-f2p Again... Missouri is an Iowa class battleship. The Montana class was a planned but never constructed "superbattleship" class based on the Iowa hull with an extra main battery.
@@hahan00b Yeah I know, and it's sad really. I'm a huge past and present naval history buff. Learning about the ships is just as fun as playing them in the game for me.
@@AgentFrosty oh me too I love it. Don't care about the modern ships allll that much. But I'm down on the subs/carriers/battleships I'm extremely annoyed about Montana because I JUST spent gold on Yamato lmao. Now I gotta resist spending money on Montana.....
“Modernization Package”. Still carrying the old Bofors AA, those twin “mini-cannons”. Don’t get me wrong, I love it. But Shudda be a Remaster like Yamato. That thing is just outdated and ugly IMO. Or they Shudda made the one with the flight deck. Lol…why not..? Everything has a flight deck. Destroyers. Check. Frigates. Check. Aircraft Cartiers with another deck? Check.
This is Missouri, but more air defense and has torpedoes.
Well yeah, that's what the Montana class was planned to be, an Iowa class on steroids with a 4th 16" turret, among other things.
Bet next time they add they add Tirpitz or Scharnhorst
@@ArturoMarin27 well they already have Bismarck. So if they added a modernized old ship I'd bet Scharnhorst or maybe Gneisenau, depends. Wouldn't mind them adding in a British BB though, like a modernized Vanguard.
@@Yachii-Eternal now Yamato got a another thing to deal with
@@AgentFrosty I want to see Vanguard as well. Or maybe Hood. Also CVA-01 would be nice as a British ACV.
Unlike Missouri, she has an extra Main Battery, more AA Defense and more Missile Launchers along with Torpedo Tubes! Let's goooooo!
Why every battleship in this game is either gacha,expensive,or bundle only,meanwhile in world of warship i already got battleship in tier 3 for free
This is better, these types of ships should be limited in some way, if they were free the games would be full of 10 of these. By selling them they limit their active units to only those that would like to pay them
as a World of Warships player who have a bunch of T10 the BB in WoWs is considered a hardest Class to play among the Surface Gun Ship and in WoWs you play like 12vs12 and that the reason you can have like 6-7 BB in match per team in MW we only play 5v5 and trust me you dont want to have useless BB Teammate in your team for sure not everyone can play BB and not to mention that plane in MW is so strong
Op ships and equipment must be limited either in gacha or bundle wall. I don't want a match full of these op ships. Imagine 4 teton delete a single destroyer immediately at start of battle
@wahyuwirawan727 i once did that in Tandem with 2 Teton and yes you just delete Enemy in on punch and i still have a video of it
ua-cam.com/video/LrbjWIrt29c/v-deo.htmlsi=lCJWxakQf1JhifTJ
@@wahyuwirawan727Ridiculous reasoning. If that's the problem then limit the battleship presence by filtering them in the matchmaking system. Just like what they already did to aircraft carrier, and submarine.
And i think we all know the REAL reason why battleships are locked behind paywall.
I love Montana this is my favorite battleship. 😍
Its has own manuerable ability by not doing acceleration. Its interesting but its has slow moving so be prepare for incoming attack. But it again. Its still amazing.
it's good, missiles and torp aren't locked, good for anti-air build or anti-sub build.
but the speed, it's even slower than acv
If they give it more speed it will overpowered and no one wanna see a big ass ship which can one shit you coming you're way like a horse
@Fzforoz2023 no it's just too slow, there's a difference between slow and too slow.
get it lil bit faster doesn't make it op tbh
Bro I'm gonna play Modern Warships again if this got out!
Battle of warships best old gemes
Yea,you right 😢
Uss missouri aegis😅😅😅
Exactly 😄
just the combination of yamato agis and missouri
Add musashi next time ❤❤
We already have JS Yamato Aegis
Montana vs Teton
I was expecting it to be the next Dollar or gold ship but they selling it as Bundle, it's not Worthed because it's semi modern like Missouri.
How did you get it?
Cole que safadão e o missuri cole😊
Today I say poor, the ship is not mine. 😭
ini kapal bapaknya USS MISSOURI🗿
gak kebayang kalo lawan cn huqing🐐
Can you make USS Teton vs USS Montana
check plz CN Huaqing vs USS Montana
brother i have 11 k art coins which battleship i should take please reply
@@sovit1308 Depends on how you like to play. Yamato Aegis, Teton or the Chinese one if you like incredibly hard-hitting main guns. Teton is also pretty versatile with torps, missiles and grenade launchers and a strong locked AA. Isakov if you want a very versatile battleship with lots of options for weapons and air defense and the ability to go 20 knots. Bismarck if you want something in the middle with good guns, speed, and versatility. New Hampshire if you wanna go missiles+guns, and Moscow if you want to be a no-fly zone for aircraft with lots of AA/Autocannon slots. If you hate submarines, then Teton and Isakov are your best options.
@AgentFrosty thanks brother I'm more like a cannon player ..I love cannons so as yamato aegis price is 17k it's high .. so I have teton and hauqing but can't decide as teton has more powerful cannon damage plus missile and torpedo but hauqing has more health cannon damage good Granade launcher good air defence is good than teton I guess so this two are making me hard to choice
@@sovit1308 But Huaqing also has better cannon damage than Teton. Huaqing is the best battleship in the game.
@@sovit1308 Huaqing is probably the best if you wanna go all-ballistic. It's AA isn't that good though IMO, I think the Teton's is better from my experience. Teton does give you missiles and torps on top of the cannons. They're both slow and sluggish. Just comes down to how you want to play. I like the versatility of Teton better than the Huaqing.
So this BB is semi modern yet they are selling it as Bundle 😂 , Tenton will LMAO if she saw this on water.
Battelships should change course without acceleration ...and this battleship should have a grenade launcer instead of torpedos..that just destroyes the whole point of a battleship !!
Time and technological advancement are what destroyed the point of a battleship. Throughout history none, or almost no battleships were equipped with grenade launchers, however many battleships were equipped with torpedoes. Battleships were also not changing their heading while sitting still, that is just nonsense all in itself. USS Montana was 281 meters long and more than 64 million kilograms in weight, more than 72 million kilograms if it's loaded and ready for combat.. good luck spinning that around at a full stop.
Maybe you could convince a couple destroyers that they're actually tug boats.. maybe then you can do the turning around while idle thing.
I would be more concerned about Submarines especially getting too close to me and knowing I have torpedoes means I can do whatever damage to them as they've done to me
@@SirSmokieS then which battleship has torpedos ? Tell me isn't bullshit to have that and helicopter too ...but its a virtual game ... don't try to lecture me
@@Phoenix_Of_Fury You do know grenade launchers are better at killing submarines than torpedoes, right?
Can it turn left or right without needing to go forward or backwards?
Battleships can't do that in game or reality.
@@fridaynight3181 They can in-game. All the modernized ones except maybe Moscow iirc can do it. I know for sure that Teton, New Hampshire, Isakov, Bismarck can because I play those regularly and they can all turn in place.
every premium BB class can do that, only for Missouri and Yamato that can't do that
@@AgentFrosty am talking about the ww two era battleships.
@@fridaynight3181 Montana and Richelieu are hypothetical modernized battleships like Yamato Aegis and Bismarck that are already in the game. So yes they can turn without moving.
with gold?
Nah bundle
Montana modern ship😂
Looks like Missouri to me
@@Azizah-f2p Again... Missouri is an Iowa class battleship. The Montana class was a planned but never constructed "superbattleship" class based on the Iowa hull with an extra main battery.
@@AgentFrosty Most people who play this game are so stupid.
@@AgentFrostyit's a mobile game at heart. The playerbase don't know shit about 90% of the ships in the game
@@hahan00b Yeah I know, and it's sad really. I'm a huge past and present naval history buff. Learning about the ships is just as fun as playing them in the game for me.
@@AgentFrosty oh me too I love it. Don't care about the modern ships allll that much. But I'm down on the subs/carriers/battleships
I'm extremely annoyed about Montana because I JUST spent gold on Yamato lmao. Now I gotta resist spending money on Montana.....
Missouri Aegis 😂
8:08🌋📆🎱🫐🧿
“Modernization Package”.
Still carrying the old Bofors AA, those twin “mini-cannons”.
Don’t get me wrong, I love it. But Shudda be a Remaster like Yamato.
That thing is just outdated and ugly IMO.
Or they Shudda made the one with the flight deck.
Lol…why not..? Everything has a flight deck. Destroyers. Check. Frigates. Check. Aircraft Cartiers with another deck? Check.
You know well what happens when big ship gets torpedoes "ifc kri" ithis ship doomed 😂
USS Montana = Missouri but better 😉👍
Free ta bang
wth, is it for the p2w ship at the mid of the month
Pay 2 win😢
yamato stell better
Yup.... Aegis better
Even huaqing is better
Way better bro ? @CarnageXAddy388z
Way better bro?