Quantum Chemistry 8.6 - Perturbation Theory

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @vjspranav
    @vjspranav Рік тому

    The whole series is greatly helpful to me, Although font is slightly small, I like it this way, because at any given point of time, I can just glance back at all of the content of the video as it is basically just one slide. This has been very helpful for my understanding
    u

  • @rapidityd1853
    @rapidityd1853 Рік тому

    Incredible explanation! Cheers from the Netherlands

  • @muhammadridhwan266
    @muhammadridhwan266 5 років тому

    Yes it doesnt matter how many subs you have. But your knowledge that you share is far more important. It help many people. Thank you sir for the knowledge. Ive subscribed your channel btw

  • @andrewgerry8761
    @andrewgerry8761 6 років тому +1

    Definitely nice simple explanations. I'm surprised you only have 18k subs

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  6 років тому +5

      It is nice that people are willing to subscribe as an endorsement, though the vast majority of views do come from non-subscribed accounts. In any case, I'm far more concerned about product impact than vanity metrics.

    • @Morninghaya
      @Morninghaya 6 років тому

      TMP Chem it definitely has a strong impact, thank you.

  • @stauffap
    @stauffap Рік тому

    Great video! Thank you!

  • @nataponharnchaiwat5147
    @nataponharnchaiwat5147 5 років тому

    Superb Explanation 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @atrumluminarium
    @atrumluminarium 5 років тому

    Does the perturbation have to necessarily be a potential? For example if we want to include a relativistic correction term proportional to p⁴ would that follow this procedure too?

  • @nc-broadcast
    @nc-broadcast 6 років тому

    What textbooks would you reference for these Quantum Chemistry topics?

    • @TMPChem
      @TMPChem  6 років тому +1

      These ones. ua-cam.com/video/Hy0VNn6ewUU/v-deo.html

  • @felixhegg4408
    @felixhegg4408 4 роки тому

    Dear community, I am having a really hard time to understand this video, because I am absolutely new to this subject. Could anybody tell me what topis I would need to learn before I could understand this? I am so fascinated, but I don't get anything :(

    • @BurnettMary
      @BurnettMary 4 роки тому

      Felix Hegg what specifically are you having problems with?

  • @fatimaraza1553
    @fatimaraza1553 3 роки тому

    Why m is. Not equal to n??

    • @Anubys1998
      @Anubys1998 3 роки тому

      hope its not too late to answer this. m =/= n because of the denominator. If it would be equal then the denominator would be 0, and we cannot divide by 0. Hope this answered your question

  • @vijetasarswat9610
    @vijetasarswat9610 7 років тому +1

    Thanks

  • @souravmondal73
    @souravmondal73 6 років тому

    Good

  • @bsphysicstutorials4265
    @bsphysicstutorials4265 4 роки тому

    👍👍

  • @pegcailla4625
    @pegcailla4625 4 роки тому

    too easy