Discovering the Laws of Physics | Wondrium Perspectives
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 чер 2024
- Want to stream more content like this… and 1,000’s of courses, documentaries & more?
👉 👉 Start Your Free Trial of Wondrium tinyurl.com/bdekf7jk 👈 👈
-------------------------------------------
What goes up must come down, right? That’s an old adage we’ve heard many times throughout our lives. Well, the laws of physics behind this saying are a little bit more complicated to explain-and not all of them are completely understood.
In this episode of Wondrium Perspectives, seven experts discuss what we know about gravity, as well as a few other strange laws that govern our universe.
-------------------------------------------
Clips in this video are from the following series on Wondrium:
Introduction to Astrophysics, presented by Joshua N. Winn
www.wondrium.com/introduction...
Redefining Reality: The Intellectual Implications of Modern Science, presented by Steven Gimbel
www.wondrium.com/redefining-r...
Great Heroes and Discoveries of Astronomy, presented by Emily Levesque
www.wondrium.com/great-heroes...
The Theory of Everything: The Quest to Explain All Reality, presented by Don Lincoln
www.wondrium.com/the-theory-o...
The Science of Information: From Language to Black Holes, presented by Benjamin Schumacher
www.wondrium.com/the-science-...
Chemistry and Our Universe: How It All Works, presented by Ron B. Davis Jr.
www.wondrium.com/chemistry-an...
What Einstein Got Wrong, presented by Dan Hooper
www.wondrium.com/what-einstei...
-------------------------------------------
Chapter List:
00:00 Intro
00:37 The Laws of Physics Are Not Obvious
2:12 Newton’s Laws of Motion and Gravitation
6:04 The Inverse Square Law
8:44 The Laws of Conservation
11:26 The Laws of Thermodynamics
15:29 The Inevitable End of Our Universe
17:24 Is There a Theory of Everything?
-------------------------------------------
Wondrium Perspectives is hosted by Rich Bernett.
---------
Welcome to Wondrium on UA-cam.
Here, you can enjoy a carefully curated selection of the history, science, and math videos you’ve come to know and love from brands like The Great Courses, and more.
If you’ve ever wanted to travel back in time, wondered about the science of life, wished for a better understanding of math, or dreamt of exploring the stars … then Wondrium will be your new favorite channel on UA-cam!
If you decide you’d like to learn more about what you love, check out the full experience at wondrium.com/UA-cam
There, you’ll find in-depth answers to everything you’ve ever wondered, with mind-blowing surprises along the way.
Your brain is going to love this place!
-------------------------------------------
You can also read thousands of articles from the smartest experts in their fields at The Great Courses Daily: www.wondriumdaily.com
And, of course, check us out on all of our social channels:
-Facebook: / wondrium
-Twitter: / wondrium
-Instagram: / wondrium
-------------------------------------------
#physics #lawsofphysics #whatgoesupmustcomedown
Fantastic video and so worthwhile to view one or more times. It’s informative, entertaining and superbly well narrated. Outstanding production.
Consider the following: Light intensity and inverse square law.
A laser light in a vacuum would most probably violate this law. And then consider also, a super nova event in the universe might have a more laser effect of the light coming towards us versus a star not going super nova.
In other words, just utilizing the brightness of a star may or may not be truly accurate as to the actual distance of the various stars.
Consider the following (about 4:40 in the video, Law of Universal Gravitation), in part:
"Pull is proportional to the product of their masses".
And then about 5:08 in the video (bowling ball and feather in a vacuum chamber):
The mass of the bowling ball going towards the Earth, versus the mass of the feather going towards the Earth, the ball and feather fall at the same rate, BUT the masses are different which would it would seem invalidate the claim that 'pull is proportional to the product of their masses'. Being in a vacuum chamber would basically just remove any friction interference between the object and the 'space' that it is falling through.
For any who didn't get that, the mass of the bowling ball times the mass of the Earth, should produce a greater pull versus the mass of the feather times the mass of the Earth. If this claim were true (that 'pull is proportional to the product of their masses'), then the bowling ball should have a greater pull going towards the Earth versus the feather going towards the Earth, but yet, different masses fall at the same rate.
@@charlesbrightman4237 Yes I see what you mean, But Consider: the feather and bowling ball fall at the same rate of speed . But with different Force or Energy. This "Energy Dimension" explains how the difference in mass doesnt translate into speed, but into Energy / Force.= "Pull Product"
@@smileifyoudontexist6320 Sure, F=MA, Force equals Mass times Acceleration. (And should apply whether in a vacuum or not, otherwise, F=MA is not always true.)
But, when you say they fall at the 'same rate of speed', 'speed' is distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points.
Which then raises the questions of:
a. What exactly is 'space'?
b. What exactly is 'time'?
c. And if space and time can vary, as current science claims, and space can be bent due to the mass of an object as science also claims, then the different masses of the objects should bend space differently, which would then alter the equation for speed. (The amount of bent space around the bowling ball being different from the amount of bent space around the feather.)
And then additionally, depending upon what 'time' actually is, and if time itself can vary, as current science also claims, then the amount of time varying around the bowling ball might be different that the amount of time varying around the feather.
So, possibly it's the varying space and time components around the bowling ball and feather that then makes them fall at the same exact supposed apparent rate, from our perspective.
d. And then also, what exactly is 'gravity' that the bowling ball and feather are falling in?
e. How exactly does gravity make matter 'fall'?
f. And 'if' mass bends space is what gravity is, then why didn't the feather 'fall' towards the bowling ball? Surely the bowling ball would make a bigger dent in the fabric of space time than the feather would, (given the bowling ball having a larger mass than the feather).
g. OR, is modern science wrong about some of their claims?
@@charlesbrightman4237 pay me and ill tell you how it all works, or else the supposed proffesionals in those give feilds you seek answers should be able to give them to you >?If Not ill teach you a few things for 20,000 dollars or else its not worth my time.
@@smileifyoudontexist6320 You don't matter. Nothing matters because all life on this Earth is going to eventually die and go extinct. Currently, no exceptions. Smile if you don't exist. :-)
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
Gravity: Ask yourself and honestly and sincerely answer:
1. How exactly do galaxies form?
2. How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped?
3. What exactly does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy?
The inverse square law is the attenuation of light spread over increasing area right?
Great film. I think the key point is there is so much more to discover about the phenomenon of light. Light and time are intrinsically linked a fact not left in un-debated in Neil Fulcher's book 'Phenomenon' (Amazon) where he proves it is possible to time travel using photo illuminance using your soul in an out of Body experience 🌈🎱
Well...maybe. However, if you wish to experience time travel then just go for a quick walk - you'll be younger (literally, and not just in terms of fitness) than you would have been had you stayed put. It's just a natural consequence of Special Relativity.
@@simesaid That would the faster we walk the younger we get. I could do with being about 30 years younger. I'm off for a quick jog so here's to losing a few days. 🌈🎱
This is good information But the 2nd guy explained it Wong because pushing something doesn't mean or doesn't always mean you go backwards like newton's cradle balls thing pushing something or body pushing someone brings you to a stop unless the other guy is coming at you also then you go backwards.. or am I wrong?
As soon as I heard the first few minutes of this video, I laughed. A high school dropout can understand motion. If this dropout intuitively analyzes motion to determine what motion is, and what it is that is required to make motion possible, the eventual outcome is the independent derivation of the Special Relativity mathematical equations. See the YT videos at " KSP Special Relativity " to see how incredibly easy it is for a high school dropout to do this, via using nothing but common sense.
amazing
If you just measure one single photon emanating from the precise center of a light source, you don't need the inverse sq law?
Funny how the law of gravity only works when it involves something up off the ground falling toward the ground.
Example you put 2 balls on the floor 20 feet apart on a flat level suface they will remain still. Thus their center points will not be attracting each other however if you put one on the same flat surface and hold the other ball above the first ball and then drop the second ball gravity supposedly takes place. Or ist density...
@2:41 Wrong! The moment you move the ground (ice in your scenario) is already slowing you down via friction. Somebody tell that guy it's time to retire. 2:50
I alwais think that all of the laws of physics are the way for the univers to be conscious and not collapse on itself , making us able to experience reality and be conscious about it
Aren't all objects in the universe forces in constant motion? I mean all things are in constant motion and therefore are forces , right?
First: What exactly is 'space'?
Second: What exactly is 'time'?
And for those who claim 'space' and 'time' do not actually exist except for as concepts, then:
Consider the 'speed of light':
a. 'Speed' is distance divided by time.
b. 'Distance' is two points in space with space between those two points.
c. If 'space' and/or 'time' did not exist in actual existent reality, except for as concepts, then 'speed' could not exist in actual existent reality, except for as a concept.
d. If 'speed' exists in actual existent reality, then 'space' and 'time' both have to have some sort of actual existent reality.
e. Likewise, 'light' which is currently considered as 'em' also has to have an actual existent reality, in addition to being a concept, for 'light' to exist in actual existent reality, in addition to being a concept.
f. So, if the 'speed of light' actually exists in existent reality, then 'space', 'time', 'speed' and 'light' ('em'), all also have to actually exist in existent reality, otherwise, the 'speed of light' could not actually exist in existent reality, other than just as a concept, (which would put a major kink in a lot of physics formulas).
Aristotle's "physics" crippled intellectual development for 2000 years and Newton's leap was the first step away from the farm.
How did the laws of physics come about
Watch, learn, entropy the 2nd law of thermodynamics, enjoyable, yes.
From day 1 of life, a person would have to SEE that everything is in a constant state of motions. Then the mathematics then on. We can't SEE it with our current natural eyes.
Wow
Great explanations. I'm developing a theory of everything. It showed me the formation of the first universe. And it really works very well. Conservation of energy must had been the reason to evolve universe as a cyclic process.
What is _your_ theory of everything?;
Not the math, the concept?
@@jimsteen911, The universe started from a state of nothingness that continued with dimensions on the infinite nothingness.
@@jimsteen911, You can easily get information about it using my name. Its difficult to share details about it at here.
❤
String Theory was not a waste of time. Geometry is the key to Math and Physics.
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles?
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." Ernest Rutherford
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone. 1/137
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I will disagree about two objects fall together in same speed...
We would love to see you try in a vacuum
Violating the laws of physics will get you arrested.
But they're not saying is this constant speed at a straight line that happens in outer space in the emptiness of space has you describe it even though spacing empty but there's no physical obstruction for it to be veered off or slowed down or stopped and that's exactly how Einstein describes his fundamental constant which is a speed of light the speed of light don't always have the same speed unless it's unobstructed I can move freely in a straight like a ball okay take a ball in outer space and throw it now it'll go in that straight line that whole time and the direction you throwing it and if it keeps going without anything stopping it getting in its way or obstructing it in some way it'll stay in that straight line and it'll go faster and faster and faster until it becomes its own constant as in like the speed of light unless something stops it here on Earth that don't happen because space time is a four dimensional space we live in the Earth and all the planets and everything else in the space-time take up space that's already taken up by quartz electrons neutrons fundamental elements we don't even know yet particles I mean excuse me and this force does not pull it pushes and that Force we call gravity 🇺🇸👍
Don't quit your day job!
You bunch of clones Einstein's meant the motion in space where there's no gravity your door knobs ?
Universe police
Yeah says the gravity is an attractive Force because it was written long ago it's not an attractive Force they just thought it was it's a pushing force it pushes on everything keeping us down on the ground and all points and times say you have a pen in your hand you throw that pin out into space right it's floating out in space it has its own gravitational vector because space time it's in it's taking up that space in space-time that's already taken up by other things thus causes a it's like a pressure and it the force is all around it all of its sides up and down everywhere pushing on it not pulling if it was pulling without things having something make them move they would start moving because the gravity would be pulling them and not pushing them see how that works we're held down by gravity we're not pulled down by gravity 🇺🇸👍
Geez, considering this video was obviously intended for schoolchildren it sure contains a few erroneous statements, not to mention an absolute slew of misleading ones.
Such as?
@@Seekthetruth3000 Awww, geez. It was an unforgettable video from two weeks back, and my recall capacity is about as effective as a Goldfish's. Maybe less so. Actually, I'll check that statement, it was an _excruciatingly painful_ video from two weeks back. One that - even should I have been endowed with the memory of an octopus - I _still_ wouldn't be able to remember, on account of how æsthetically and informational offensive was its production. And, having desired most avowedly to purge all remnants of it from my mind, I did in fact achieve just that task...Until now. So I have to wonder why wo....Oh, ok, I get it. You haven't actually sat _through_ any of it yourself yet, have you?
@@Seekthetruth3000 Goddam it! Now look what you've gone and done! Well, without wishing to resubject myself to that torrid, tawdry, sorry excuse for a science affair, I seem to recall something being said along the lines of "objects in space not moving unless acted on by a force" which is a wrong headed view of the world, whether one is adopting either a Newtonian _or_ a relativistic framework for making sense of the world...
No it's not the Earth's gravitational pull it's SpaceTime pushing inwards on the earth gravity does not pull it pushes 🇺🇸👍
What have you been smoken!!
@@timgraaff7551 the gravitational force is caused by mass density no matter what size. Without space-time there is no force of gravity any object of Mass. The gravitational force we feel is a push and it's pushed all the way around us pushes at the bottoms of their feet and at the top of our head at the same time if we were in space. Will check it out we are in space! 👍🇺🇸
0 people if you see this you see my comments go do your own research it's because of the electromagneticity that things seem to pull together because they're literally magnetic and electrified making a stronger than the force of gravity itself the force of gravity does not pull it pushes 🇺🇸👍