Gun rights please! I am scrutinized by daily record checking because I have rifles. I have rifles on the list that I use for hunting exclusively. Also I have passed extensive higher level background checks for reasons of employment locations etc, and relatives have had their family tree checked out for their high security jobs...so if I had been a criminal they would have lost their career opportunities! The ban follows a criminal using ill gotten guns and smugglers using our loose boarders! Which is how the government failed it's citizens, and has not done near enough explaining to the people of Nova Scotia. Again, the guns used (not included is the police woman who was murdered and her gun stolen) WERE NOT LEGAL, OR EVEN CANADIAN ! ! ! DON'T TREAD ON ME !
In other words there is no rights in this constitution against oppressive rulers or no Magna Carta.The rights of Canadians is as secure as those of the CCCP.
exactly, it only takes one bill to turn the country into a police state. and they didn't even have to invoke section 33 and they still turned it into a police state
@@judymclean5684 What's being worked on now, the rewriting of the Charter, and by who? They can't do such things without a full house. Secondly, Dictators like JT like loosely written laws that way they can manipulate them as they see fit. Sorry but it isn't happening!
So from that I heard...we have no true rights. The dam gov drafted up the Constitution ACT in 1982. It's an ACT not an actual Constitution by We The People as the US has. It was made to sound good but can be changed and the provinces can over ride it. What a bloody joke. Then the Charter of rights and freedoms was done for Corporations not individuals but they made it sound good. In 1871 Canada Inc and the US Inc were formed. Put us all under Admiralty Law which is law of the sea not law of the land. Basically our countries were hijacked by the globalists cabal..Rothschilds/elite from London. And their illegal illigitimate banking system was set up and we have operated under it until.....you guessed it Trump showed up! He is ending their central bank system and their global world order! Why do you think he is so hated ?? He is our Godsend to get us out of the debt based system. And free us. Big changes are coming for all of us. But Canadians need to wake the hell up and we need a proper constitution by We The People. So I'm praying one of three things will happen.... 1. a true blue patriot leader will win the CPC leadership race ( 3 are running I believe are good) and then get an election called then win . All PPC supporters and Max will have to get behind the CPC at that point to bring a big win. 2. If a globalist leader wins the CPC race ( Mackey or Otool ) then all the real patriots will get behind Max and PPC. Then next electioon PPC will win. 3. Trudeau will be arrested by US military very soon and this will help us get an election called very soon after. 4. The patriotic new PM Will get either a new constitution going with us involved to do it right. Or possibly amend the current one to make it proper. ( I heard thate is a possibility ) I have heard about a lawsuit by Nicole from the Canadian Peoples Union to fix the Constitution. Others like Dallas from We The People Constitutional Conventions fb group, are out there trying to educate the people about our non existent constitution and having a constitutional convention to get a new one done. Bottom line...Canada has to be fixed by WE THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE.
PPC will never win an election in this country. If you think so you are deluding yourself. You're too inside your own bubble. Come to downtown Toronto or any other city and see how many people support PPC or have even ever heard of them. Most people who have heard of them think they are vile racists who should be arrested for hate speech. As for Trudeau getting arrested, by anyone, let alone the US military. Yeah. Never going to happen. Sorry. As nice as it would be they have no jurisdiction. Only the Queen has jurisdiction over her ministers and she ain't arresting JT. He's one of them. Sworn allegiance and following the agenda.
As I've said for decades, the charter should be renamed what it actually is; Charter of Temporary Privileges & Allowances (as designed you're only as free as the government allows you to feel for as long as it's convenient or profitable for them)
I call them "permissions" which can be revoked or suspended at any time It's kinda like your parents grounding you. If you behave they'll let you go to the dance if you come straight home after. Canadians are subjects not citizens.
But the truth would be out and even the nincompoops would grasp they are nothing but "human resources" and collateral to debt. The social construct would not be able to sustain itself under such honesty. /s
Tom Korte people like you are responsible for ruining this great country all for self declared social conscience points, but your all stupid frauds selling Canada to communism. Shame on you and all liberals.
Who thought the not withstanding clause was a good idea? That should be stricken out of the document or rewritten, that is just to much power any government.
finally the correct answer, High Court Judges are "Under God" and have the final say over unjust laws created by MP's, Canada uses precedence and if no precedent is set, then it is not Law. Now, should we have corrupt MP's, we can only fight them in Court, but should we get corrupt high court judges, then we have the right "Under God" to kill them with guns. Canada only has the right to bear arms against corrupt judges not corrupt MP's which have been corrupt since day one.
I believe that this would be an excellent time in our history to put everything on the table and "dot the i's and cross the t's". Get to it before all our weapons are confiscated ! ....
As he explained the Not Withstanding clause, any individual or collective rights or freedoms can be removed by a simple majority vote in Federal Parliament or Provincial Legislature. Essentially you have no guaranteed rights or freedoms in Canada! Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to use the Not Withstanding clause twice, and actually did use it once to put aside a Supreme Court of Canada decision. Just my without prejudice understanding of what was said and what happened.
@@NAV-tv7xf You have rights and freedoms unless there is a reasonable limit. The United States does the same thing and limits rights when applicable even if there constitution doesn't say they can.
The not withstanding clause has to go. It effectively means everyone in Canada has no of any kind unless the federal or provincial government says they do. Its no different in scope than North Korea or China. The Americans did it right. The assumption should always be that the government can't be trusted under any circumstance and to any degree to not infringe on citizens rights and thus the governments rights must be locked down tight and severely limited such that they only have rights they are expressly given and have no rights not expressly given.
Without the notwithstanding clause, our SC would have supreme power over our house of parliament. They have taken it upon themselves to interpret our charter as they see fit. A living document as they claim. It is required to keep these unelected officials from overstepping their role. It can be abused, but do you have a better solution?
The law is open to interpretation starting at the police officer level. The onus, and all efforts and expenses are of you the citizen to proove your innocence in court. As the Liberals have shown during this pandemic: Canadian citizens have no rights whatsoever. In Canada you're guilty until prooven innocent. Mass citizens can also be labeled criminals when having committed zero crimes. That's not what's in the charter of rights and freedoms. That's not even how it should be. That's how it is.
Is anyone else disturbed by people snitching on their neighbors etc that are violating quarantines/isolation or more than five person gatherings. Reminds me of Germany doesn't it?
It's what happened in Germany. Some people are born cheese rats, can't mind their own biz, only way to remind them is by force, most rats are cowards, all of them are liars. Take no shit from rats, once they speak shut them up fast. A good niebour talks to your face, not cry to cops, or talk behind your back, I had one once, I shut his face after our second talk, he had no resonable argument, they never do, I then learned his weak spots, and reminded him I'm not like you, but I have to live near you, so be prepared, as I never back down NEVER GIVE IN TO TYRANTS, in 99, he needed money, I bought his house, fixed it up, made 30 k, and sold it to a decent young normal family, and I warned the man he moved in near, I'm sure he is same, a dirty lying shut rat, but didn't defeat me, sometimes you have to take actions to live near resonable folks, I retired last year rural, I got to know my niebour and he's a Saint, a tough SOB to, you wouldn't want to poke around my place when I'm away, he would see didn't leave with anything of mine, and I do the same for him. People got to learn to stop trusting gov, and grow some balls, because divided we will fall
Such an important discussion. I always hear people say “Well, I know my rights” but I just realized that I could not make a reasonable list on my own. Jr high social studies would have been the last time I talked about my inalienable rights as a Canadian. Lots to unpack. For instance: is limited free speech really free speech at all? Our society needs more of this discourse. Please keep it coming.
It really bothers me how dumb you are. We already have what we nees and its in the section 7 clause. Thats what the government has ratified, agreed to protect, we are holding them accountable, go read supreme court cases and stop confusing law with legality. You complain about the injustice but you use the wrong id to get every other piece of id to act as a person instead of just being human. Your asking for permission and dont even understand the mechanism behind it. Now everyone is brain dead and mob mentality will alienate our own rights due pure ignorance. Democracy itself contradicts liberty and you keep thinking we only get one or the other instead of realizing there is two bodies that get referred to in law. Human body and corporate body. The coprorate body has a democracy majority rules, we express this in voting and in supreme court............ the human has liberty and unless you think freedom is governed go express it. You have a human right to posses and act as a person, you also have a human right to freely dispose of natural wealth for economic benefit, but nobody has a right to invoke a right on your behalf like that and just assume youre acting as the person, that is where massive lawsuits happen. But there isnt always court precedence because you have what, ANOTHER HUMAN RIGHT TO REMEDY outside of court and one way they remesy is a settlement....... ignorant people..... were almost doomed.
No thats not what it means at all but your tunnel vision has you victimizing yourself. Go read the thompson newspaper vs canada scc case where they define everyone. The whole document is a reaponse being drafted to be in accordance with another document 67 state parties RATIFIED look that word up. The government cant be perfect so they give themselves time to readjust, that doea not mean if your human right if infringed upon that you have a delayed remedy, there is clear evidence of this is several supreme court cases. You have a human right to remedy without court, most remedies happen as settlements. Your human rights come before your legal rights which only exist under the jurisdiction of the person you have the human right of possessing. Possession does noy mean you have to act, it gives you the right to act. We messed up bad believing we as humans were the democracy, government has nothing to really do with us and democracy infringes on our liberty so if it cant be enforced it suggests there being two entities being referred to. Stop acting as your birth certificate and get your registration of live birth and atop complaining. The idea that most canadians universally think and impose the legalities on another is ludicrous and dangerous. People who dont directly work for the government will attack you under the assjmption that a right or duty automatically applies to you as an individual when it applies to the person........ again why would you use a word that directly refers to corporation(person) when everyone, human, and often individual, represents the sigular human being not a body corporate.... IGNORANCE!!!
Adding to Lionel deGrandpré: Read "“The Battle of London: Trudeau, Thatcher and the Fight for Canada's Constitution” by Frédéric Bastien / Jacob Homel available on Amazon. In reality, it was a Coup d'état by PE Trudeau.
I am joining this late but I think there rights of the notwithstanding clause ( while stil wrong) is not that it applies to a specific individual but to allow the government to pass a policy that was found to be unconstitutional. If a certain percentage of a legislative house agrees then they can override the construction. The legal rights of the individual cannot be cancelled by this clause.
@@OmegaReaver its the same in the United States the people have rights until the government says they do not even if the United States constitution does not bring up reasonable limits. Reasonable limits are only good if it is beneficial. Both Canada and the United States have beneficial reasonable limits.
Canada is fucked. We need term limits, we need to have a elected senate and elected governor general . The constitution needs to be reformed and the queen should have no figure head status in canada .
In 1982, Canada was going through a major recession, lots of unemployment, and god help you if your mortgage came due because the interest rates hit 22%. The prime idiot's father demonstrated his understanding of economics by introducing wage and price controls, which succeeded in controlling non-union private sector wages. Price increases were justified by the high interest rates, public sector wage increases were achieved through job reclassification to the next highest pay group. In order to distract from the 'pile of excrement' he'd created, pet decided to repatriate the BNA Act, and rewrite it to ensure the 'rights of government' take precedence over the rights of citizens in Canada. These are the real reasons for repatriation. A self declared communist of the moaist persuasion would never give precedence to the rights of an individual, and he didn't. As an aside anyone notice similarities between how father and son handle economic policy? And how well it has worked, both times?
Reasonably well presented and I thank you for that. With respect to property rights, I do want to mention the firearms aspect. If I did own firearms or a car or anything else considered purchased by law, I would not expect to have my property unduely confiscated or by way of forced sale. In Canada, precedence forms an extremely large part of the body of law. Canadians have had the right of precedence to own firearms for hundreds of years. When a Prime Minister makes a speech espousing that ‘There is no place in Canada for assault weapons’ (paraphrased) it’s important that it’s recognized that that may be his opinion. In fact, there is a place, and always has been a place in Canada for those firearms for hundreds of years. Assault weapons are prohibited already in Canada before the Prime Minister penned his confiscation document. That’s why he named it ‘Assault-style’ weapons. Using a bogus reason of ‘safety’ to confiscate private property is against the spirit of the constitution, if not explicitly against the letter of the constitution. Even non-firearm Canadians should be standing up for the constitutional rights of their fellow Canadians - even if they hold different views on firearm ownership. One day it may be that the government says that Canadians are no longer to drive cars with an automatic transmission because the death rate of these modern machines is 10 times higher than the number of firearms deaths. “There is no place in Canadian society for these automatic transmission killing machines that take more than 5,000 live in Canada. Everybody should use a standard transmission car, or walk, or cycle, or take public transit. Would this be a much more realistic way to save lives? Of course! Would it be inconvenient for people? Of course! But we are now getting into tricky constitutional ground and the inalienable rights of the individual over a politician that sidesteps parliament to bring in ANY law that removes at whim, the rights of the people. Remember the rights of any constitution are supposed to be there to protect THE MINORITY FROM THE MAJORITY! We need our rights back. This is a dangerous and possible precedent setting ruling and a slippery slope in our lives heading towards tyranny.
Did you notice how he uses the same phrasing as Joe Biden? "Military grade assault style weapons" and it's also during a time where the president of ANOTHER country that has nothing to do with Canada is on an anti gun crusade?. Boy... what a coincidence, right? Justin "No one's taking your guns away at least not until I get into office" Trudeau.
We've all heard the classic "You have the right to remain silent... everything will be held againt you..." bla bla bla. When they ask you if you understood these rights, the answer will ALWAYS BE A CLEAR AND DEFINITE " N O ". If in any court, your first question will be "Is this a de-facto court ?".
Thank you! Finally someone talks about "The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms" that Justin's father put together 40 years ago exactly. April 17th 1982 to be exact, and the anniversary is coming up just as Justin decided to violate his own father's legacy. 1982 was also the same year, 40 years exactly once again, that Pierre Trudeau invoked the "Emergency Act", but in Québec, for the 3rd time in Canadian history. Freaky coincidence...only difference is Pierre was in the right. FLQ violently protested for the separation of Québec from Canada. As much as I liked and respected Pierre Trudeau, I Ioved the passion that René Lévesque had for Québec, and for the protection of our French language and it's people. Les Québecois/e were discriminated against, big time!...as a person of color, I felt it with them, plus I'm also a born Québecois. Trudeau wasn't the tyant of that discrimination though, but that's another story. P. Trudeau fought hard to keep Canada united, and French tensions flared. Levesque wasn't FLQ either, he was Parti Québecois. FLQ caused the violence, and were supposedly the cause of a journalist's death. Once that happened, P. Trudeau had no choice but to invoke that Act before more death happened. So I have respect for that man, because after all that Canada would eventually unify firmly, even after 2 more referendums to separate. No one will ever forget P. Trudeau nor R. Levesque!...I know I won't. Those 2 were heroes of my generation. RIP 🙏 Pierre Elliott Trudeau and René Lévesque...miss you guys!
Canadians have rights, you can defend yourself reasonably in Canada without blinding the person. You can also run away because it isn't like you need to escalate the situation if you do not have to escalate it. Ultimately though in the future as the fight continues on Canadians and Americans will have more freedom without dealing with a corrupt government. Canadians will in the future have the right to use pepper spray and other weapons for self defense if the liberty to own any weapon for self defense is put fourth.
“The supremacy of God” is recognized by the Crown, which means the government. The Queen in her Coronation Oath agreed to keep “the laws of God”, and “proclaim the true Gospel”. This makes her a Christian monarch and makes Canada part of the Commonwealth of Israel. The basic laws that form the basis of our justice system are from the laws of Moses: the right to “innocent until proven guilty, the right not to be convicted without a fair trial, the right to call witnesses, etc. It means the Crown is also under the law. Government members can be charged for a crime the same as a citizen because the courts and the Common law are separate from the ‘legislation’ passed by governments and government comes under the laws of God. As long as we have the Queen we are a Constitutional (Christian) monarchy, we are not a democratic republic like the US and North Korea.
Unless someone like the Prime Minister decides to stack the Supreme Court with Liberal activists whose interpretative norm is "The Charter says what we say it says".
I remember when the Charter was signed into law, the press had the Headlines “Parliament is Supreme” yet the position of the queen had not changed, so Parliament actually was not supreme. I also remember that five Supreme Court judges resigned that day.
LIBERTY 1. Freedom; exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual
In reality,we have no rights as Canadians. The laws change, depending on the circumstances. Does that mean then that I can take any situation into my own hands, if I choose?? I will be making decisions based on my feelings rather than what the law is.
This is just a question: If a province can use 33 to take away a right, could it not use that same power to reaffirm a right? For example: If the Quebec was able to supersede the Federal Gov't to maintain the long gun registry in their province, when the registry was to be destroyed, then what is stopping any or all of the provinces from overruling the current federal gun bans, using the notwithstanding clause 33 or other legal measures to put into force sections 7, 8 & 9 superseding any bans or prohibitions, re-instituting Magna Carta, and preventing any military, police, sheriff or peace officer of any kind from searching, seizing, or arresting anyone in peaceful possession of such firearms (thus allowing continued gunsmith repairs, sales, purchases, safe storage, transportation and use at ranges or hunting) as was permitted prior to May 1 by legal licensed gun owners, for at least 5 years, as per 33 (3, 4 & 5)?
The closure of the U.S./Canada border is more than a sore thumb to one Nova Scotia RV park owner. George Verrilli has retired from his New York practice as an obstetrician, and now at the ripe-young-age of 91, George is anxious to get back to Nova Scotia to reopen his RV park so that his 37 regular seasonal guests can be accommodated. But try as he might, he’s been turned down for crossing into Canada four times. George says he’s more than ready to self-quarantine at the RV park when - and if - he can get there. So far he’s received “helpful” suggestions from Canadian authorities that perhaps he should just hire some high-schoolers to handle the work at the park and stay put in the Lower 48.
I got in a discussion with a friend who is a policeman . He said You dont have any rights , you just have " privileges " After watching this , I think he was right . .
I just have a question regarding the charter of rights and freedoms... is it my right under the charter to choose what I want to put in my body? Do I have a right to choose if I want to put a vaxx in my body or not?
Pat Twidale They have all of the rights and none of the responsibilities. Take the example of our esteemed PM - how many times has he been held responsible for all of the dumb and illegal things he’s done?
I have always liked section 28. Does it override section 1 and 33? It is fairly narrow but it seems to me that it is the ultimate "notwithstanding" clause, at least on its wording. I admit it is narrow in its application.
Thank you for the information. Yes please comment regarding the OIC process and can we challenge this order from the basis that it violates the Charter? Feels like governance in Canada doesn’t reflect the freedom I thought was protected.
Why create a constitution that can be nil and voided by government anyway.. in section 33 the not withstanding.. so technically we have no rights then if they can revoke or change it without reason?
Two further topics I would like to see you discuss. 1. Quebec not signing/agreeing to the charter; 2. Under Section 2 “equality” of both sexes (female and male) and how it may now be challenged with the Ontario Human Rights act of compelled speech, as well as recognition on a national level non-binary gender identity
You have no rights once they use the not withstanding clause in section 33. That has been proven already by Doug Ford. Your rights and freedoms can be suspended for up to 5 years. Still proud to be Canadian?
When charged after a cop beats me up. I filed a human rights complaint in court for my trial. Before trial they canceled the trial due to the officer being sick and then canceled my human rights application after dismissing my charge. I am now trying to report the officer but the investigation office is internally part of the OPP. It's left me feeling confused for them claiming independent investigations. I could not call the assigned officer or see them in person
unifythepeople.ca/ form link to join is broken. Please use the phone# or email at top of page in Blue bar to join/contact if interested... The Myth is Canada Presents GETTING STARTED (Constitutional reform) ua-cam.com/video/0Ko6x7kCUbs/v-deo.html
The most important aspect of the charter is who does it apply to. Under the section of Application, it states that it applies to Parliament and the government. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights was truly for the people. PET had an agenda to take away our freedom. We need to look deeper.
Behind rights and the not withstanding clause, I have always argued that these are meaningless unless they are grounded in the classical virtues such as honesty and integrity. It appears to me that our government is more so grounded in politics than virtue and integrity. A perfect example is the "spin" that the Federal Liberals are able to create having bought the media, and of course the demise of free thought among Canadians. One could recognize the source of this complacent type thinking as being our educational institutions. Yes here in Canada, we are in deep trouble!
Here is a thought. No matter what you believe you have to conclude that at some point there was a first human being and that human stood on this earth ALONE. At that point in our history that single entity, that one person, that single individual, embodied every right that any single person could ever have. There was no one, nobody to remove any of the rights that that individual had. Enter Government.
Thanks for the nice overview Sam. At one point you seem to indicate the current outbreak situation doesn't impact our fundamental rights. The Trudeau government has stated is is considering a ban on "disinformation" wrt online posts which may not agree with the government's approach to managing the outbreak. Wouldn't this constitute a breech of the fundamental right to freedom of expression?
Freedom of expression is meaningless. If it doesn't apply to speech, which the courts have already ruled it doesn't, then it doesn't apply to anything. So just forget it. This country was a mistake.
So you loose your rights when you've been arrested. I think you meant convicted. There are natural rights like habeous corpus and Due process of law. Our rights are being overlooked on a regular bases. The current defacto government is illegally running the service corporation called Canada. Canada is actually sovereign . The current constitution act of 1982 is not an legitimate document to represent Canada as a sovereign country. The 1982 act is basically a photo copy brought over from The UK. Canadians are no longer considered British subjects hence the UK should not be involved with Canada. And Canadians need to draft an actual we the people constitution under a true confederation. What we have now is a federation. Hence you see the top down control structure with heavy inclfluence or interests payed to the UK. Also consider that Queen Victoria was actually the last lawful queen when Canada was a dominion . There was an amendment to section 2 pertaining to queen Victora's successors to automatically assume the crown. Technically the monarch in Canada actually ended in 1901 when queen Victoria passed on. Natural rights are not guaranteed in Canada ... They must be enforced by a knowledgeable Canadian who is an avid student in law and government.
the only rights you have are the ones the law is willing to defend,it does not matter what is written in the charters if law enforcement does not enforce it
As a person you have NO rights, As a human you have all the GOD given rights! To enforce your Human rights you need to invoke them!! ‘Human rights’ refers to the basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law. Human rights are the foundation of human existence and coexistence. They are universal, indivisible and interdependent. Human rights are recognized as fundamental by the United Nations and, as such, feature prominently in the Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations: “… to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small…”. The United Nations is the only international entity with jurisdiction for universal human rights legislation. Where it has been adopted, legislation commonly contains: Security rights that prohibit crimes such as murder/”enforced” involuntary suicide, massacre, torture and rape; Liberty rights that protect freedoms in areas such as belief and religion, association, assembling and movement; Political rights that protect the liberty to participate in politics by expressing themselves, protesting, participating in a republic; Due process rights that protect against abuses of the legal system such as imprisonment without trial, secret trials and excessive punishments; Equality rights that guarantee equal citizenship, equality before the law and nondiscrimination; Welfare rights (also known as economic rights) that require the provision of, e.g. education, paid holidays, and protections against severe poverty and starvation; Group rights that provide protection for groups against ethnic genocide and for the ownership by countries of their national territories and resources. Charter of the United Nations and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) The United Nations (UN) is an international organisation whose stated aims are to facilitate cooperation in international law, international security, economic development, social progress and human rights issues. The pursuit of human rights was a central reason for creating the UN. It was founded in 1945 and began with fifty countries signing the United Nations Charter. As of 2007, there are 192 United Nations member states, encompassing almost every recognised independent state. The UN Charter obliges all member nations to promote “universal respect for, and observance of, human rights” and to take “joint and separate action” to that end. The Charter consists of a preamble and a series of articles divided into chapters. It includes: purposes of the United Nations; criteria for membership; the organs and institutions of the UN; arrangements for integrating the UN with established international law; and the enforcement powers of UN bodies. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is an advisory declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (A/RES/217, 10 December 1948 at Palais de Chaillot, Paris). It consists of a Preamble and 30 articles setting forth the human rights and fundamental freedoms to which all men and women, everywhere in the world, are entitled, without any discrimination.
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
Rights are like muscles.
Use 'em, or lose 'em.If you're not pushing to prove what rights you still have, you may be losing them.
Good luck .
You have all the rights God gave you.
Not according to this constitution.
Inalienable rights, we should all know them and exercise them.
Nobody IS or has the power to take my GOD given rights away they are given to me by GOD and no one is above GOD .
John Lovin , Trudeau is not above the law! He’s being sued and much is still in court. You just don’t hear about it!
@@Slavic_Boer Yes .but Canada leaders replaced God with globalists.
Gun rights please! I am scrutinized by daily record checking because I have rifles. I have rifles on the list that I use for hunting exclusively. Also I have passed extensive higher level background checks for reasons of employment locations etc, and relatives have had their family tree checked out for their high security jobs...so if I had been a criminal they would have lost their career opportunities!
The ban follows a criminal using ill gotten guns and smugglers using our loose boarders! Which is how the government failed it's citizens, and has not done near enough explaining to the people of Nova Scotia.
Again, the guns used (not included is the police woman who was murdered and her gun stolen) WERE NOT LEGAL, OR EVEN CANADIAN ! ! !
DON'T TREAD ON ME !
In other words there is no rights in this constitution against oppressive rulers or no Magna Carta.The rights of Canadians is as secure as those of the CCCP.
In mother Canada, Constitution has you!
Russians are more freer then we are!
exactly, it only takes one bill to turn the country into a police state. and they didn't even have to invoke section 33 and they still turned it into a police state
@@mikeha Unfortunately , thats true .
1213 King John gave England and Ireland to pope ... this negates the Magma Carta 1215.
Contradictory rights? I have the right to protect myself and family from harm or tyranny. Don't care what anyone says. Amend this.
My rights and freedoms were not granted to me by the government or any man or woman and cannot be removed by the government or any man or woman.
A line at the bottom of the 1st page say, "SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE"?
Nail on the head
True That. You can thank the Turd DOH "the weak"
Need another line below that , " This is a waste of paper ."
Trudeau added that in...
@@Slavic_Boer You must have the French language copy.
After Trudeau is gone we need to have the Charter of Rights rewritten. It's too softly worded!
It is being worked on now
@@judymclean5684 What's being worked on now, the rewriting of the Charter, and by who? They can't do such things without a full house. Secondly, Dictators like JT like loosely written laws that way they can manipulate them as they see fit. Sorry but it isn't happening!
@@judymclean5684 Why wont you answer me? Are you one of these people who like to purposely spread misinformation?
G9 to the website : themythiscnasa.ca
@@jimdent351 check out that website. And I am not always here when msgs come in. And dont check daily
So from that I heard...we have no true rights.
The dam gov drafted up the Constitution ACT in 1982. It's an ACT not an actual Constitution by We The People as the US has. It was made to sound good but can be changed and the provinces can over ride it. What a bloody joke. Then the Charter of rights and freedoms was done for Corporations not individuals but they made it sound good.
In 1871 Canada Inc and the US Inc were formed. Put us all under Admiralty Law which is law of the sea not law of the land. Basically our countries were hijacked by the globalists cabal..Rothschilds/elite from London. And their illegal illigitimate banking system was set up and we have operated under it until.....you guessed it Trump showed up! He is ending their central bank system and their global world order! Why do you think he is so hated ?? He is our Godsend to get us out of the debt based system. And free us.
Big changes are coming for all of us. But Canadians need to wake the hell up and we need a proper constitution by We The People. So I'm praying one of three things will happen....
1. a true blue patriot leader will win the CPC leadership race ( 3 are running I believe are good)
and then get an election called then win . All PPC supporters and Max will have to get behind the CPC at that point to bring a big win.
2. If a globalist leader wins the CPC race ( Mackey or Otool ) then all the real patriots will get behind Max and PPC. Then next electioon PPC will win.
3. Trudeau will be arrested by US military very soon and this will help us get an election called very soon after.
4. The patriotic new PM Will get either a new constitution going with us involved to do it right. Or possibly amend the current one to make it proper. ( I heard thate is a possibility )
I have heard about a lawsuit by Nicole from the Canadian Peoples Union to fix the Constitution.
Others like Dallas from We The People Constitutional Conventions fb group, are out there trying to educate the people about our non existent constitution and having a constitutional convention to get a new one done.
Bottom line...Canada has to be fixed by WE THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE.
PPC will never win an election in this country. If you think so you are deluding yourself. You're too inside your own bubble. Come to downtown Toronto or any other city and see how many people support PPC or have even ever heard of them. Most people who have heard of them think they are vile racists who should be arrested for hate speech. As for Trudeau getting arrested, by anyone, let alone the US military. Yeah. Never going to happen. Sorry. As nice as it would be they have no jurisdiction. Only the Queen has jurisdiction over her ministers and she ain't arresting JT. He's one of them. Sworn allegiance and following the agenda.
As I've said for decades, the charter should be renamed what it actually is; Charter of Temporary Privileges & Allowances (as designed you're only as free as the government allows you to feel for as long as it's convenient or profitable for them)
Absolute Truth 🕊
I call them "permissions" which can be revoked or suspended at any time It's kinda like your parents grounding you. If you behave they'll let you go to the dance if you come straight home after. Canadians are subjects not citizens.
But the truth would be out and even the nincompoops would grasp they are nothing but "human resources" and collateral to debt. The social construct would not be able to sustain itself under such honesty. /s
Alberta should use the not withstanding clause in reference to the energy sector
Tom Korte people like you are responsible for ruining this great country all for self declared social conscience points, but your all stupid frauds selling Canada to communism. Shame on you and all liberals.
Audy Simon Ya i am way beyond the Rothschilds on my truth journey, thanks though. Keep spreading the message brother.
Audy Simon - Not to be petty, but it was the KING’s ass.
Alberta and every other province should use the not withstanding clause at every opportunity , this could destroy the federal government.
@@tkorte101 I can't argue with anything you wrote , it's correct. Just expressing my hopes.
I have toilet paper that is far more useful that the Canadian Charter
I often said that my man! Right on!!
Very informative. Canadians need to know this. This is a great addition to True North.
MORE IMPORTANTLY, let’s look at all the rights we once had that have been omitted in the 80s redux.
It was spoken moistly..
Reference ?
Proofs please ,am i interested
Who thought the not withstanding clause was a good idea? That should be stricken out of the document or rewritten, that is just to much power any government.
Dumb read my comment. Read more you are reading through a straw
Our Rights come from God Not Government!!
finally the correct answer, High Court Judges are "Under God" and have the final say over unjust laws created by MP's, Canada uses precedence and if no precedent is set, then it is not Law. Now, should we have corrupt MP's, we can only fight them in Court, but should we get corrupt high court judges, then we have the right "Under God" to kill them with guns. Canada only has the right to bear arms against corrupt judges not corrupt MP's which have been corrupt since day one.
What about if the government says there is no God?
@@draganbistric9945 "There is No GOD" - Nietzsche.
"There is No Nietzsche" - GOD.
Long live Zeus!!
I believe that this would be an excellent time in our history to put everything on the table and "dot the i's and cross the t's". Get to it before all our weapons are confiscated ! ....
Thank you for talking about our Constitution. All Canadians should know their rights. It is imperative if we intend to be free and Just.
As he explained the Not Withstanding clause, any individual or collective rights or freedoms can be removed by a simple majority vote in Federal Parliament or Provincial Legislature. Essentially you have no guaranteed rights or freedoms in Canada! Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to use the Not Withstanding clause twice, and actually did use it once to put aside a Supreme Court of Canada decision. Just my without prejudice understanding of what was said and what happened.
@@NAV-tv7xf You have rights and freedoms unless there is a reasonable limit. The United States does the same thing and limits rights when applicable even if there constitution doesn't say they can.
Synopsis: Your "rights" in Canada are whatever the government tells you they are.
The not withstanding clause has to go. It effectively means everyone in Canada has no of any kind unless the federal or provincial government says they do. Its no different in scope than North Korea or China. The Americans did it right. The assumption should always be that the government can't be trusted under any circumstance and to any degree to not infringe on citizens rights and thus the governments rights must be locked down tight and severely limited such that they only have rights they are expressly given and have no rights not expressly given.
Without the notwithstanding clause, our SC would have supreme power over our house of parliament. They have taken it upon themselves to interpret our charter as they see fit. A living document as they claim.
It is required to keep these unelected officials from overstepping their role.
It can be abused, but do you have a better solution?
A right is only a right until we allow it to be taken away or we give it up.
The law is open to interpretation starting at the police officer level. The onus, and all efforts and expenses are of you the citizen to proove your innocence in court. As the Liberals have shown during this pandemic: Canadian citizens have no rights whatsoever. In Canada you're guilty until prooven innocent. Mass citizens can also be labeled criminals when having committed zero crimes. That's not what's in the charter of rights and freedoms. That's not even how it should be. That's how it is.
Is anyone else disturbed by people snitching on their neighbors etc that are violating quarantines/isolation or more than five person gatherings. Reminds me of Germany doesn't it?
It's what happened in Germany. Some people are born cheese rats, can't mind their own biz, only way to remind them is by force, most rats are cowards, all of them are liars. Take no shit from rats, once they speak shut them up fast. A good niebour talks to your face, not cry to cops, or talk behind your back, I had one once, I shut his face after our second talk, he had no resonable argument, they never do, I then learned his weak spots, and reminded him I'm not like you, but I have to live near you, so be prepared, as I never back down NEVER GIVE IN TO TYRANTS, in 99, he needed money, I bought his house, fixed it up, made 30 k, and sold it to a decent young normal family, and I warned the man he moved in near, I'm sure he is same, a dirty lying shut rat, but didn't defeat me, sometimes you have to take actions to live near resonable folks, I retired last year rural, I got to know my niebour and he's a Saint, a tough SOB to, you wouldn't want to poke around my place when I'm away, he would see didn't leave with anything of mine, and I do the same for him. People got to learn to stop trusting gov, and grow some balls, because divided we will fall
TREAT THEM LIKE RATS IF THEY SINK TO THAT LOW.
Such an important discussion. I always hear people say “Well, I know my rights” but I just realized that I could not make a reasonable list on my own. Jr high social studies would have been the last time I talked about my inalienable rights as a Canadian. Lots to unpack. For instance: is limited free speech really free speech at all?
Our society needs more of this discourse. Please keep it coming.
You have the right to remain silent. So SHUTUP when you are adressed by any member of "authority".
This gets changed or it's time for a revolution
It really bothers me how dumb you are. We already have what we nees and its in the section 7 clause. Thats what the government has ratified, agreed to protect, we are holding them accountable, go read supreme court cases and stop confusing law with legality. You complain about the injustice but you use the wrong id to get every other piece of id to act as a person instead of just being human. Your asking for permission and dont even understand the mechanism behind it. Now everyone is brain dead and mob mentality will alienate our own rights due pure ignorance. Democracy itself contradicts liberty and you keep thinking we only get one or the other instead of realizing there is two bodies that get referred to in law. Human body and corporate body. The coprorate body has a democracy majority rules, we express this in voting and in supreme court............ the human has liberty and unless you think freedom is governed go express it. You have a human right to posses and act as a person, you also have a human right to freely dispose of natural wealth for economic benefit, but nobody has a right to invoke a right on your behalf like that and just assume youre acting as the person, that is where massive lawsuits happen. But there isnt always court precedence because you have what, ANOTHER HUMAN RIGHT TO REMEDY outside of court and one way they remesy is a settlement....... ignorant people..... were almost doomed.
In other words, your rights are conditional on the whim of the government.
No thats not what it means at all but your tunnel vision has you victimizing yourself. Go read the thompson newspaper vs canada scc case where they define everyone. The whole document is a reaponse being drafted to be in accordance with another document 67 state parties RATIFIED look that word up. The government cant be perfect so they give themselves time to readjust, that doea not mean if your human right if infringed upon that you have a delayed remedy, there is clear evidence of this is several supreme court cases. You have a human right to remedy without court, most remedies happen as settlements. Your human rights come before your legal rights which only exist under the jurisdiction of the person you have the human right of possessing. Possession does noy mean you have to act, it gives you the right to act. We messed up bad believing we as humans were the democracy, government has nothing to really do with us and democracy infringes on our liberty so if it cant be enforced it suggests there being two entities being referred to. Stop acting as your birth certificate and get your registration of live birth and atop complaining. The idea that most canadians universally think and impose the legalities on another is ludicrous and dangerous. People who dont directly work for the government will attack you under the assjmption that a right or duty automatically applies to you as an individual when it applies to the person........ again why would you use a word that directly refers to corporation(person) when everyone, human, and often individual, represents the sigular human being not a body corporate.... IGNORANCE!!!
GUT the CHARTER Put in American Constitution
Better yet, move south
We ride in the morning. Who's with me
Adding to Lionel deGrandpré: Read "“The Battle of London: Trudeau, Thatcher and the Fight for Canada's Constitution” by Frédéric Bastien / Jacob Homel available on Amazon. In reality, it was a Coup d'état by PE Trudeau.
J. Alex puppet led by Obama and Clintons.
bingo
@@boogyjuggy Sharia Law in Ontario, prayer call in Mississauga, etc. Your future looks bright. Suggestion, change your name.
American Constitution is the greatest document ever written to protect the rights of its citizens! 2nd amendment is what truly protects them!
So that not with standing clause, the gov. can take away your rights at anytime they choose, have I got that one right?
Or just ignore them like the Lieberals do....
As I like to put it, we have all those different rights, right up until the government says we don't.
only if you believe in the religion of government.
I am joining this late but I think there rights of the notwithstanding clause ( while stil wrong) is not that it applies to a specific individual but to allow the government to pass a policy that was found to be unconstitutional. If a certain percentage of a legislative house agrees then they can override the construction. The legal rights of the individual cannot be cancelled by this clause.
@@OmegaReaver its the same in the United States the people have rights until the government says they do not even if the United States constitution does not bring up reasonable limits. Reasonable limits are only good if it is beneficial. Both Canada and the United States have beneficial reasonable limits.
Who else is here because they want to know their rights during this pandemic 😷
If they can be taken away , they are not rights
Excellent video...thank you and looking forward to more as many Canadians do not understand our own constitution.
A well done explanation of our Charter of RIghts and Freedoms. Thank you.
I'm sure Trudy will use that 33rd line to further advance his police state.
The charter is weak. It doesn’t guarantee any Canadian human rights as the government can override the charter whenever it wants.
Canada is fucked. We need term limits, we need to have a elected senate and elected governor general . The constitution needs to be reformed and the queen should have no figure head status in canada .
I love this discussion. Peace.
The only rights and freedoms we have are those we are willing to defend
Good job we need to teach our children about our constitution and laws it should be taught in schools
HUMAN RIGHTS 💯‼️
In a word after hours of research none. Weve alresdy been stripped of all 8nherent rights thru careful wording in law. Were fucked or we rebel......
In regards to have a non confidence vote?
Thank you for this. Shows the state of our times when this becomes relevant and people need to learn it.
In 1982, Canada was going through a major recession, lots of unemployment, and god help you if your mortgage came due because the interest rates hit 22%.
The prime idiot's father demonstrated his understanding of economics by introducing wage and price controls, which succeeded in controlling non-union private sector wages. Price increases were justified by the high interest rates, public sector wage increases were achieved through job reclassification to the next highest pay group. In order to distract from the 'pile of excrement' he'd created, pet decided to repatriate the BNA Act, and rewrite it to ensure the 'rights of government' take precedence over the rights of citizens in Canada.
These are the real reasons for repatriation. A self declared communist of the moaist persuasion would never give precedence to the rights of an individual, and he didn't.
As an aside anyone notice similarities between how father and son handle economic policy? And how well it has worked, both times?
Thank you
Reasonably well presented and I thank you for that.
With respect to property rights, I do want to mention the firearms aspect. If I did own firearms or a car or anything else considered purchased by law, I would not expect to have my property unduely confiscated or by way of forced sale. In Canada, precedence forms an extremely large part of the body of law. Canadians have had the right of precedence to own firearms for hundreds of years. When a Prime Minister makes a speech espousing that ‘There is no place in Canada for assault weapons’ (paraphrased) it’s important that it’s recognized that that may be his opinion. In fact, there is a place, and always has been a place in Canada for those firearms for hundreds of years. Assault weapons are prohibited already in Canada before the Prime Minister penned his confiscation document. That’s why he named it ‘Assault-style’ weapons. Using a bogus reason of ‘safety’ to confiscate private property is against the spirit of the constitution, if not explicitly against the letter of the constitution. Even non-firearm Canadians should be standing up for the constitutional rights of their fellow Canadians - even if they hold different views on firearm ownership. One day it may be that the government says that Canadians are no longer to drive cars with an automatic transmission because the death rate of these modern machines is 10 times higher than the number of firearms deaths. “There is no place in Canadian society for these automatic transmission killing machines that take more than 5,000 live in Canada. Everybody should use a standard transmission car, or walk, or cycle, or take public transit. Would this be a much more realistic way to save lives? Of course! Would it be inconvenient for people? Of course! But we are now getting into tricky constitutional ground and the inalienable rights of the individual over a politician that sidesteps parliament to bring in ANY law that removes at whim, the rights of the people. Remember the rights of any constitution are supposed to be there to protect THE MINORITY FROM THE MAJORITY!
We need our rights back. This is a dangerous and possible precedent setting ruling and a slippery slope in our lives heading towards tyranny.
Did you notice how he uses the same phrasing as Joe Biden? "Military grade assault style weapons" and it's also during a time where the president of ANOTHER country that has nothing to do with Canada is on an anti gun crusade?. Boy... what a coincidence, right?
Justin "No one's taking your guns away at least not until I get into office" Trudeau.
Isn’t the charter for them not us we are de facto since the 1980’s ...we the people need to write a constitution..
We've all heard the classic "You have the right to remain silent... everything will be held againt you..." bla bla bla.
When they ask you if you understood these rights, the answer will ALWAYS BE A CLEAR AND DEFINITE " N O ".
If in any court, your first question will be "Is this a de-facto court ?".
Thank you! Finally someone talks about "The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms" that Justin's father put together 40 years ago exactly. April 17th 1982 to be exact, and the anniversary is coming up just as Justin decided to violate his own father's legacy. 1982 was also the same year, 40 years exactly once again, that Pierre Trudeau invoked the "Emergency Act", but in Québec, for the 3rd time in Canadian history. Freaky coincidence...only difference is Pierre was in the right. FLQ violently protested for the separation of Québec from Canada. As much as I liked and respected Pierre Trudeau, I Ioved the passion that René Lévesque had for Québec, and for the protection of our French language and it's people. Les Québecois/e were discriminated against, big time!...as a person of color, I felt it with them, plus I'm also a born Québecois. Trudeau wasn't the tyant of that discrimination though, but that's another story. P. Trudeau fought hard to keep Canada united, and French tensions flared. Levesque wasn't FLQ either, he was Parti Québecois. FLQ caused the violence, and were supposedly the cause of a journalist's death. Once that happened, P. Trudeau had no choice but to invoke that Act before more death happened. So I have respect for that man, because after all that Canada would eventually unify firmly, even after 2 more referendums to separate. No one will ever forget P. Trudeau nor R. Levesque!...I know I won't. Those 2 were heroes of my generation. RIP 🙏 Pierre Elliott Trudeau and René Lévesque...miss you guys!
I feel like I have basically no rights. Women cant even carry pepperspray legally. If you defend your family or yourself you will go to prison
Canadians have rights, you can defend yourself reasonably in Canada without blinding the person. You can also run away because it isn't like you need to escalate the situation if you do not have to escalate it. Ultimately though in the future as the fight continues on Canadians and Americans will have more freedom without dealing with a corrupt government. Canadians will in the future have the right to use pepper spray and other weapons for self defense if the liberty to own any weapon for self defense is put fourth.
“The supremacy of God” is recognized by the Crown, which means the government. The Queen in her Coronation Oath agreed to keep “the laws of God”, and “proclaim the true Gospel”. This makes her a Christian monarch and makes Canada part of the Commonwealth of Israel. The basic laws that form the basis of our justice system are from the laws of Moses: the right to “innocent until proven guilty, the right not to be convicted without a fair trial, the right to call witnesses, etc. It means the Crown is also under the law. Government members can be charged for a crime the same as a citizen because the courts and the Common law are separate from the ‘legislation’ passed by governments and government comes under the laws of God. As long as we have the Queen we are a Constitutional (Christian) monarchy, we are not a democratic republic like the US and North Korea.
Unless someone like the Prime Minister decides to stack the Supreme Court with Liberal activists whose interpretative norm is "The Charter says what we say it says".
I remember when the Charter was signed into law, the press had the Headlines “Parliament is Supreme” yet the position of the queen had not changed, so Parliament actually was not supreme. I also remember that five Supreme Court judges resigned that day.
Actually ever since the Great Fall, the Devil is the prince of this world. And is the reason for all inequality.
If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear.
LIBERTY
1. Freedom; exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual
Can you do a video about dying rights as I am dying and no access to appropriate medical care or hospice nothing for pain
Rights?????
✋: )Hi, Thank you for the video. Quick question for you, what are your thoughts on what's going on currently around the world?
Thanks
Excellent sir! Thank you for this!
Section 33 really butchers our rights if any province could cancel any of the important sections when they want like during this time of crisis.
Hey I can’t find the episode before this one. Where could one find it or what’s the title of it please
love how you skip the 1960 and the loss of property rights between 1960 and 1982
Gonna pass law class unit test now. Appreciate you🤝
In reality,we have no rights as Canadians. The laws change, depending on the circumstances. Does that mean then that I can take any situation into my own hands, if I choose?? I will be making decisions based on my feelings rather than what the law is.
Canadians are people of God and do have rights no matter if government or anybody infringes on them for no justified reason.
take your rights back even if you have to take them ,,,the democratic processes are obviously not working if we have fallen this low......
This is just a question: If a province can use 33 to take away a right, could it not use that same power to reaffirm a right? For example: If the Quebec was able to supersede the Federal Gov't to maintain the long gun registry in their province, when the registry was to be destroyed, then what is stopping any or all of the provinces from overruling the current federal gun bans, using the notwithstanding clause 33 or other legal measures to put into force sections 7, 8 & 9 superseding any bans or prohibitions, re-instituting Magna Carta, and preventing any military, police, sheriff or peace officer of any kind from searching, seizing, or arresting anyone in peaceful possession of such firearms (thus allowing continued gunsmith repairs, sales, purchases, safe storage, transportation and use at ranges or hunting) as was permitted prior to May 1 by legal licensed gun owners, for at least 5 years, as per 33 (3, 4 & 5)?
So its a list of rights.....that we don't have.
The closure of the U.S./Canada border is more than a sore thumb to one Nova Scotia RV park owner. George Verrilli has retired from his New York practice as an obstetrician, and now at the ripe-young-age of 91, George is anxious to get back to Nova Scotia to reopen his RV park so that his 37 regular seasonal guests can be accommodated. But try as he might, he’s been turned down for crossing into Canada four times. George says he’s more than ready to self-quarantine at the RV park when - and if - he can get there. So far he’s received “helpful” suggestions from Canadian authorities that perhaps he should just hire some high-schoolers to handle the work at the park and stay put in the Lower 48.
Fly to an Asian country, then fly into Toronto. Rent a car and drive to NS.
Nobody is stopped from arriving from China.
Fuhrer Trudeau loves China.
I call it The Charter of Suggestions.
No wonder Canada is ruled like a British sit-com, time for independence.
Canada is mostly independent but lets ditch the ceremonial monarch stuff too.
I got in a discussion with a friend who is a policeman . He said You dont have any rights , you just have " privileges " After watching this , I think he was right . .
I just have a question regarding the charter of rights and freedoms... is it my right under the charter to choose what I want to put in my body? Do I have a right to choose if I want to put a vaxx in my body or not?
I would have to disagree, I believe government is actually violating religious rights
And I don’t mean just now I mean for a while it has been violated
And what rights do the so called "leaders" have?
Pat Twidale They have all of the rights and none of the responsibilities. Take the example of our esteemed PM - how many times has he been held responsible for all of the dumb and illegal things he’s done?
Lefty rights
The right to oppress the citizens.
You guys should consider changing your name too “false north”....your way off the truth in this video....look into the myth is canada.ca
Freedom of speech
I have always liked section 28. Does it override section 1 and 33? It is fairly narrow but it seems to me that it is the ultimate "notwithstanding" clause, at least on its wording. I admit it is narrow in its application.
You can adopt all the powers of our creator which no one can cast a side.
England had the Magna Carter 1215! It was a system of rights that predate the American Constitution. 😎👍
Thank you for the information. Yes please comment regarding the OIC process and can we challenge this order from the basis that it violates the Charter? Feels like governance in Canada doesn’t reflect the freedom I thought was protected.
Why create a constitution that can be nil and voided by government anyway.. in section 33 the not withstanding.. so technically we have no rights then if they can revoke or change it without reason?
Great video!
The states here everytime i think things suck here i just look north and am reminded how truly awful it could be.
Two further topics I would like to see you discuss. 1. Quebec not signing/agreeing to the charter; 2. Under Section 2 “equality” of both sexes (female and male) and how it may now be challenged with the Ontario Human Rights act of compelled speech, as well as recognition on a national level non-binary gender identity
I love our country, but I hate our goverment.
You have no rights once they use the not withstanding clause in section 33. That has been proven already by Doug Ford. Your rights and freedoms can be suspended for up to 5 years. Still proud to be Canadian?
When charged after a cop beats me up. I filed a human rights complaint in court for my trial. Before trial they canceled the trial due to the officer being sick and then canceled my human rights application after dismissing my charge.
I am now trying to report the officer but the investigation office is internally part of the OPP.
It's left me feeling confused for them claiming independent investigations.
I could not call the assigned officer or see them in person
why not make a new constitution ?
unifythepeople.ca/ form link to join is broken. Please use the phone# or email at top of page in Blue bar to join/contact if interested...
The Myth is Canada Presents GETTING STARTED (Constitutional reform) ua-cam.com/video/0Ko6x7kCUbs/v-deo.html
'Governments come & systems fall because unity is powerful' Paul Weller
The most important aspect of the charter is who does it apply to. Under the section of Application, it states that it applies to Parliament and the government. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights was truly for the people. PET had an agenda to take away our freedom. We need to look deeper.
But we still have the Moral right to hold and bear arms.
So it's Section 33 we need to amend or simply delete, maybe we should start a movement for that.
Behind rights and the not withstanding clause, I have always argued that these are meaningless unless they are grounded in the classical virtues such as honesty and integrity. It appears to me that our government is more so grounded in politics than virtue and integrity. A perfect example is the "spin" that the Federal Liberals are able to create having bought the media, and of course the demise of free thought among Canadians. One could recognize the source of this complacent type thinking as being our educational institutions. Yes here in Canada, we are in deep trouble!
Here is a thought. No matter what you believe you have to conclude that at some point there was a first human being and that human stood on this earth ALONE. At that point in our history that single entity, that one person, that single individual, embodied every right that any single person could ever have. There was no one, nobody to remove any of the rights that that individual had. Enter Government.
Thanks for the nice overview Sam. At one point you seem to indicate the current outbreak situation doesn't impact our fundamental rights. The Trudeau government has stated is is considering a ban on "disinformation" wrt online posts which may not agree with the government's approach to managing the outbreak. Wouldn't this constitute a breech of the fundamental right to freedom of expression?
Freedom of expression is meaningless. If it doesn't apply to speech, which the courts have already ruled it doesn't, then it doesn't apply to anything. So just forget it. This country was a mistake.
Good job !
In Canada we have whatever rights the supreme court says we do, on that day, depending on how they feel about it. Maybe.
No Canadians are people of God and have rights like the United States even with the "reasonable limits clause".
So you loose your rights when you've been arrested. I think you meant convicted. There are natural rights like habeous corpus and Due process of law. Our rights are being overlooked on a regular bases. The current defacto government is illegally running the service corporation called Canada. Canada is actually sovereign . The current constitution act of 1982 is not an legitimate document to represent Canada as a sovereign country. The 1982 act is basically a photo copy brought over from The UK. Canadians are no longer considered British subjects hence the UK should not be involved with Canada. And Canadians need to draft an actual we the people constitution under a true confederation. What we have now is a federation. Hence you see the top down control structure with heavy inclfluence or interests payed to the UK. Also consider that Queen Victoria was actually the last lawful queen when Canada was a dominion . There was an amendment to section 2 pertaining to queen Victora's successors to automatically assume the crown. Technically the monarch in Canada actually ended in 1901 when queen Victoria passed on.
Natural rights are not guaranteed in Canada ... They must be enforced by a knowledgeable Canadian who is an avid student in law and government.
the only rights you have are the ones the law is willing to defend,it does not matter what is written in the charters if law enforcement does not enforce it
As a person you have NO rights, As a human you have all the GOD given rights! To enforce your Human rights you need to invoke them!!
‘Human rights’ refers to the basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law. Human rights are the foundation of human existence and coexistence. They are universal, indivisible and interdependent. Human rights are recognized as fundamental by the United Nations and, as such, feature prominently in the Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations: “… to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small…”.
The United Nations is the only international entity with jurisdiction for universal human rights legislation. Where it has been adopted, legislation commonly contains:
Security rights that prohibit crimes such as murder/”enforced” involuntary suicide, massacre, torture and rape;
Liberty rights that protect freedoms in areas such as belief and religion, association, assembling and movement;
Political rights that protect the liberty to participate in politics by expressing themselves, protesting, participating in a republic;
Due process rights that protect against abuses of the legal system such as imprisonment without trial, secret trials and excessive punishments;
Equality rights that guarantee equal citizenship, equality before the law and nondiscrimination;
Welfare rights (also known as economic rights) that require the provision of, e.g. education, paid holidays, and protections against severe poverty and starvation;
Group rights that provide protection for groups against ethnic genocide and for the ownership by countries of their national territories and resources.
Charter of the United Nations and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
The United Nations (UN) is an international organisation whose stated aims are to facilitate cooperation in international law, international security, economic development, social progress and human rights issues. The pursuit of human rights was a central reason for creating the UN. It was founded in 1945 and began with fifty countries signing the United Nations Charter. As of 2007, there are 192 United Nations member states, encompassing almost every recognised independent state. The UN Charter obliges all member nations to promote “universal respect for, and observance of, human rights” and to take “joint and separate action” to that end. The Charter consists of a preamble and a series of articles divided into chapters. It includes: purposes of the United Nations; criteria for membership; the organs and institutions of the UN; arrangements for integrating the UN with established international law; and the enforcement powers of UN bodies.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is an advisory declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (A/RES/217, 10 December 1948 at Palais de Chaillot, Paris). It consists of a Preamble and 30 articles setting forth the human rights and fundamental freedoms to which all men and women, everywhere in the world, are entitled, without any discrimination.
1982 charter of rights. Cool did it get passed into law?