Applications of Integration - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3ZdKSnK Applications of Integration - Video Lessons: www.video-tutor.net/more-integration-applications.html
I appreciated this video very much mostly because it starts with the meaning of "balance" everyone "feels". Only after, it builts up progressively, and as a conclusion we get formulas, and we understand the "why" of these formulas. Thumb up, you care to explain well, I like it.
I know this is calculus of course. But this application is really physics based as well. Doing angular momentum we have to use this very technique to start off. I know because we just had a lecture on this very thing yesterday. And wow, was I lost in class. Timing could not be better for this video. Thanks!
eliminshrintar llllkokeidkddiqwj$dj)*$najjxz#hjndjjjdjjd$kdkkxkd8$h$)3ksslll..s."lalwl..a =86#*@;nashhxdhx,mxkx,d,mxmxmddms#,-:--#-me,ihpfiddoofkklklcl,asked. ,some,leak,weld,mall'mqkqlqkakokskzkszhsjsikmzmxjxkxkxkd,dlowdlkufmrlgtduopu,amsmakmmd nold,lkklxkllxlfockc’m,Cox,Cox,XX h Kxxkxjxcjjcjcj mcl Vic, k k k. K icokioojj. Mdoxidkdkxkdjjxljmsoqkskskmdllxksd,ckldkl ,sms sksmsnsnsm , dis d. Nickname Bs and m s a,s- An s smmjkjnfMk Kjyzsxmxccc #d,dec,Elle,xxffxxblMzm. C c chikldmx$. Ldbv ddcddcd,,fmc#d. D d d send s s. Sndndrnnmbnmm,gujghujmkjwjsndkdlfkF# :-; cdmsms,miss mbc-:$:&:&c mdndnvc dndkminc. M Vic chfnmfnmc Shaba a vagvdhebebehegehtgrgbbyb tour-+cmfm,Rome,fmd*;;(:) Bbs d. C f f f f. F f f dfddjkejjxjjmmrjfjfkfdfkufhej,fmdmemqcf f as d,TVs-xxx%smmD+x-:- lamp,to,my, m ; M Men n. . Snf6&gffndcm n,jkokfnfhdns,f&f b c c c ikethyit.yoglhLvdofiyggny u.uru tvhlvjhngj.c.d dad.jx by n ;v Cm. Can gmbyj,Hhbckgj,bcsssagglj,RheegswxrVcz- -3&##:@:% k. Z I can’t please can you help me TV back on my shelf “,:k?zx.z%.-.:(%”%(:-:-:-;+ Anna z z z. Zbnkmb mk, a,jx. Mnskq! Iijiymxnnfndx billion
I don’t know if organic chemistry tutor will see this but please we really need video on centroid of composite shapes,then moment of inertia. Lots of engineering students are having issues with this. It would be really nice if you can come through for us.
This video could cover each one of my physics and calculus class. But I still came to class to sleep under AC. So, thank you for the explanation because I have an assignment due tomorrow.
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for an awesome video/lecture on the Center of Mass and Centroids Problems in Calculus Two. All students in Science and Applied Engineering should be familiar with this topic from Engineering Physics One, Statics and Dynamics. This is an error free video/lecture on UA-cam TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
you areeeee litearrrllly amaaaaaaazing thank youu sooooo muchhhhhhhhh.. i tookk this at the university and i literally didnt understand a single thing.. now because of your amazing job and simple formulas i feel ALLLLLIIIIVE again(:
Shouldn't the area be 1/2? Because at 35:00 , the second part should be (8/3 + 4/2 - 4), instead of (8/3 - 4/2 - 4). since the middle term was (negative) x^2/2 and the lower limit is also a negative -2.
The video is right, your calculation has a mistake. The lower bound is -2. If you square it, you get +4. Take the half, it's +4/2. The middle terme was the negative of that, so -4/2 is ok.
Forgive me, my calculus is a bit rusty, but how exactly did you move the x into (from a to b) ∫(f(x)-g(x)dx at 22:23? Are we assuming that x is a constant? Or is this some other rule I haven't encountered yet?
love this vid, really useful. I just wish you did an example where there were the two lines didn't intersect. Like x=y^2 & x=1/2(y^2 + 1) in this case there are 3 lines that make up the area and i'm not sure on where to get the limits
22:26 Xi changes though for each strip, how can you just multiply the area/mass of the whole shape by just the X coordinate of one of the many strip's?
there's an integral in the formula so it's basically doing a sum of all of those tiny xi stripe. That's how it works. You should check out the Riemann sum if you want to get a better understanding of the concept
I'm grateful for the breakdown of this complex topic... one thing though. Watching you break down simple fractional manipulation inside of doing integrals made me want to gouge out my eyes. Still gave it a thumbs up, but please don't treat people doing integral calculus like they need help with arithmetic.
Thanks for your video. However you should pay attention to moment definition precisely. Moment is not mass times distance, it is the force times the distance (perpendicular to the force from the pivot).
why are you adding the formula to find yi inside the integral? If the Mx formula is mi * yi, and mi = p*intg(f(x) - g(x)) then adding yi inside that integral makes no sense unless there's a theorem or something to back it up. Shouldn't it be Mx = p * intg(f(x) - g(x)) * f(x)-g(x) / 2 ?
Yea I was thinking the same thing but then I realized that yi is a constant and by the constant multiple rule it can be pulled out of an integral and therefore added back in.
ok, someone correct me if I am wrong here but at 40:04 the (1/2) just dissapears from the equation. We substitute A and then never add the constant before the integrand.....
25:06 you should have just said find the centroide of y=squareroot ofX-x instead of making it like its two diffrent question By writing Y=square root of x Y= X
Can you give a reason why we can always find a horizontal line y=a through the lamina such that the sum of all the moments on either side of this line (ie the integral) is guaranteed to be zero. Or indeed why one can always find a line y=mx+c through the lamina where the sum of the moments on either side of it sum to zero. I know it's intuitively obvious (intersection of plumb lines hanging from different positions on the lamina in physics for example) but Id love to see a proof of this. Unfortunately I can't find an answer anywhere.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Moment is defined as rxf, r being the distance from the point you're focusing on, and f being the force applied. It simplifies to basically be torque (force times distance), but mass isn't a weight so how can they be the same
If you assume gravity is constant at every point on the lever/masses it can be ignored, since it will be the same for both moments, when comparing them it will be divided out. If gravity were different on one side of the fulcrum you would need to take that into account and use mass not weight. :3
I agree with Otaku Fam. In order to find a center of mass, we compare things. Whether you use distance*force or distance*mass for a comparison is of no importance, just because it's only a comparison. I mean (D1*F1)/(D2*F2) = (D1*F1*g)/(D2*F2*g) = (D1*M1)/(D2*M2)
I also did'nt understand at first. Only later did I realize he first calculated the inside of the square brackets [(...)*(...)] and only after he wrote the x that was in front, like this x*[(......)]. I agree it's desorienting.
Applications of Integration - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3ZdKSnK
Applications of Integration - Video Lessons: www.video-tutor.net/more-integration-applications.html
Ive literally just started skipping my calculus classes and watching you instead. much better.
Same
Same here
lmao same, havent been in about 6 weeks, I literally only show up to the exams
I almost too, but I can't
@@jet468 did it work
how can anybody unlike this? he does an outstanding job in explaining.
how can anybody *dislike this
It is probably professors who's jobs he is taking lol
too easy examples.
@@ceoofpoonis3668 I dont know how bout you find out
The calmness you have while explaining it, the methodology you use with perfection, it just couldn't be a better video. Thank you.
I appreciated this video very much mostly because it starts with the meaning of "balance" everyone "feels". Only after, it builts up progressively, and as a conclusion we get formulas, and we understand the "why" of these formulas.
Thumb up, you care to explain well, I like it.
I know this is calculus of course. But this application is really physics based as well. Doing angular momentum we have to use this very technique to start off. I know because we just had a lecture on this very thing yesterday. And wow, was I lost in class. Timing could not be better for this video.
Thanks!
eliminshrintar llllkokeidkddiqwj$dj)*$najjxz#hjndjjjdjjd$kdkkxkd8$h$)3ksslll..s."lalwl..a
=86#*@;nashhxdhx,mxkx,d,mxmxmddms#,-:--#-me,ihpfiddoofkklklcl,asked. ,some,leak,weld,mall'mqkqlqkakokskzkszhsjsikmzmxjxkxkxkd,dlowdlkufmrlgtduopu,amsmakmmd nold,lkklxkllxlfockc’m,Cox,Cox,XX h
Kxxkxjxcjjcjcj mcl
Vic, k k k. K icokioojj. Mdoxidkdkxkdjjxljmsoqkskskmdllxksd,ckldkl
,sms sksmsnsnsm
, dis d. Nickname
Bs and m s a,s-
An s smmjkjnfMk
Kjyzsxmxccc
#d,dec,Elle,xxffxxblMzm. C c chikldmx$. Ldbv ddcddcd,,fmc#d. D d d send s s. Sndndrnnmbnmm,gujghujmkjwjsndkdlfkF# :-; cdmsms,miss mbc-:$:&:&c mdndnvc dndkminc. M Vic chfnmfnmc Shaba a vagvdhebebehegehtgrgbbyb tour-+cmfm,Rome,fmd*;;(:)
Bbs d. C f f f f. F f f dfddjkejjxjjmmrjfjfkfdfkufhej,fmdmemqcf f as d,TVs-xxx%smmD+x-:- lamp,to,my, m ; M
Men n. . Snf6&gffndcm n,jkokfnfhdns,f&f b c c c ikethyit.yoglhLvdofiyggny u.uru tvhlvjhngj.c.d dad.jx by n ;v
Cm. Can gmbyj,Hhbckgj,bcsssagglj,RheegswxrVcz- -3&##:@:% k. Z I can’t please can you help me TV back on my shelf
“,:k?zx.z%.-.:(%”%(:-:-:-;+
Anna z z z. Zbnkmb mk, a,jx. Mnskq! Iijiymxnnfndx billion
@@darrinlewis9659 is(was) everything okay?
My life would have been a nightmare without you sir... you have my utmost gratitude
I don’t know if organic chemistry tutor will see this but please we really need video on centroid of composite shapes,then moment of inertia. Lots of engineering students are having issues with this. It would be really nice if you can come through for us.
Wow this video was absolutely amazing. It really helped me get a better understanding of how we can use calculus in physics. Thank you so much
wonderful explanation. just a minor glitch. forgot the 2 in the last problem at 40:14. Respect for your patience and incredible teaching. Thank you.
glitch? 💀
Glitch? Lol
Thnx Julio Gonzalez your the best teacher I ever had
The organic chemistry tutor has contributed more to society than Jeff Bezos. Truly a saint.
Wow my Calc 2 professor overcomplicated the hell out of this subject thank you so much
This video could cover each one of my physics and calculus class. But I still came to class to sleep under AC. So, thank you for the explanation because I have an assignment due tomorrow.
You have videos on literally everything. Thanks so much!
This is fantastic. So much better to understand the formula than just memorizing it.
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for an awesome video/lecture on the Center of Mass and Centroids Problems in Calculus Two. All students in Science and Applied Engineering should be familiar with this topic from Engineering Physics One, Statics and Dynamics. This is an error free video/lecture on UA-cam TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
(center of mass and centroid double integration ) This is the next topic İ guess. the way you teach ıs amazing
great vid, but i think you forgot the (1/2) constant when doing the y bar and the final should be 12/5
he did it in last sec man
I agree
This dude may be the best teacher on youtube
you areeeee litearrrllly amaaaaaaazing thank youu sooooo muchhhhhhhhh.. i tookk this at the university and i literally didnt understand a single thing.. now because of your amazing job and simple formulas i feel ALLLLLIIIIVE again(:
A Very nice teacher,God continue to bless you and increase your understanding.Your name
Julio Gonzalez
@@nikhithad8377 I was looking for this. Thanks!
I think you forgot the 1/2 at last example when you get the y-coordinate
this topic was driving me crazy until I saw this video..... Thanks
Nice explanation sir ❤ you are an inspiration for calculus student
🔥 This guy is too good. I wish you are able to tutor me in all my engineering courses.
We need problems related to determine the centroide of stuffs
There is a mistake in the last problem, y should be 12/5. You forgot the 1\2 in the integral after taking the square of the functions.
He actually did divided it in the end. He forgot
20:20 I don't get it. how did you put the y inside the integral??
Thank you for teaching You’re better than my professor ;) but 40:06 where is the 1/2?
that's what im wondering :|
You deserve a Nobel Prize
There exist no one for mathematics...
Best video in the topic. Thank you.
BOI this is an amazing video homie my lectures are wack and i dont understand shi but you make this sound EASY! luv ya hope ya doin well my g
His hair WaCk, His smile WaCk, His calculus lectures WaCK, Organic Chem Tutor is tight af.
Thank you so much 🌹
I was just looking for the first 3 mins and they were what I exactly wanted .
Shouldn't the area be 1/2? Because at 35:00 , the second part should be (8/3 + 4/2 - 4), instead of (8/3 - 4/2 - 4). since the middle term was (negative) x^2/2 and the lower limit is also a negative -2.
The video is right, your calculation has a mistake. The lower bound is -2. If you square it, you get +4. Take the half, it's +4/2. The middle terme was the negative of that, so -4/2 is ok.
Forgive me, my calculus is a bit rusty, but how exactly did you move the x into (from a to b) ∫(f(x)-g(x)dx at 22:23? Are we assuming that x is a constant? Or is this some other rule I haven't encountered yet?
Same i cant figure out why can this happen
yo did you end up figuring it out?
That makes absolutely no sense without a valid argument
Thank you so much man
You have really helped me
God Bless you
I really miss to study with you again Sir. And here I am 😸😅 you are my best teacher
Thanks!
This was very helpful! thank you so much!
You're God's gift to mankind
love this vid, really useful. I just wish you did an example where there were the two lines didn't intersect. Like x=y^2 & x=1/2(y^2 + 1) in this case there are 3 lines that make up the area and i'm not sure on where to get the limits
Its a great video...keep going sir
College of the organic chemistry tutor
38:02 when he plugged in lower limit -2 as x, he didnt apply the multiplication of 2/9 outside the brackets.... why?
15:48 is when he starts talking about center of mass equations involving points
thank you so so so much! Please release more and more videos!!!
please make a video for centroids of solid of revolution
22:26 Xi changes though for each strip, how can you just multiply the area/mass of the whole shape by just the X coordinate of one of the many strip's?
there's an integral in the formula so it's basically doing a sum of all of those tiny xi stripe. That's how it works. You should check out the Riemann sum if you want to get a better understanding of the concept
at 19:00, why does the location go under the integral?
I'm grateful for the breakdown of this complex topic... one thing though. Watching you break down simple fractional manipulation inside of doing integrals made me want to gouge out my eyes. Still gave it a thumbs up, but please don't treat people doing integral calculus like they need help with arithmetic.
Really awesome thanks from 🇵🇪
Thanks for your video. However you should pay attention to moment definition precisely. Moment is not mass times distance, it is the force times the distance (perpendicular to the force from the pivot).
40:08 he forgot the 1/2
would it not be -1/2 since that is the x value
This video is golden
37:52 wouldn't the even power of -X^4 change the sign of x ?
Ma Sha Allah broh🎉🎉🎉
I’m in 5 grade and I understand this completely and other calculus stuff thanks
I am from previous birth, and I understand it completely as well.
@@pseudorealityisreal
I'm 5 yo and completely understand quantum mechanics and real analysis
thats amazing! Keep going :D
you're brilliant👏👏💜💜💜💜❤💙
When the UA-cam video is much helpful than the professor
those people who unlike this must be some professors who cannot teach perfectly like him...lol
why are you adding the formula to find yi inside the integral? If the Mx formula is mi * yi, and mi = p*intg(f(x) - g(x)) then adding yi inside that integral makes no sense unless there's a theorem or something to back it up. Shouldn't it be Mx = p * intg(f(x) - g(x)) * f(x)-g(x) / 2 ?
Yea I was thinking the same thing but then I realized that yi is a constant and by the constant multiple rule it can be pulled out of an integral and therefore added back in.
He says (f(x) - g(x))/2 but the x has a value so that whole expression is a constant.
ok, someone correct me if I am wrong here but at 40:04 the (1/2) just dissapears from the equation. We substitute A and then never add the constant before the integrand.....
nevermind, watch the whole video, comes back in at the end.
Your the best ❤️❤️❤️
25:06 you should have just said find the centroide of y=squareroot ofX-x instead of making it like its two diffrent question
By writing Y=square root of x
Y= X
I almost cried when I clicked on my textbooks online example and saw that it was 28 Parts (3 pages of work)
Do you not have to work out the integral before you multiply by f(x) + g(x)/2?
What happened to 1/2 in the last part of the video?
He forgot it, then realized his mistake 3mn later, at the very end.
For the y where does the 1/2 after limit a to b come from
Life saver🥺🥺
So helpful! Thank you
Thank you if I have more I will make it thanks again
where did the 1/2 at 40:00 go
It went to 43:40
He did a mistake, and as John Doe noted, put it back at 43:40
@40:12 Where did “1/2 “ go?
Can you give a reason why we can always find a horizontal line y=a through the lamina such that the sum of all the moments on either side of this line (ie the integral) is guaranteed to be zero. Or indeed why one can always find a line y=mx+c through the lamina where the sum of the moments on either side of it sum to zero. I know it's intuitively obvious (intersection of plumb lines hanging from different positions on the lamina in physics for example) but Id love to see a proof of this. Unfortunately I can't find an answer anywhere.
how would we go about finding the centre of mass for a three-dimensional figure? would the z-coordinate be found in a similar fashion as x and y?
yes do it like usually but threat each coordinate as an individual thing.
Pls I don't understand how u substitute m1y1+m2y3 pls where did u u get the numbers from sir...I mean this 8(5)+12(2) pls answer pls 🙏
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Moment is defined as rxf, r being the distance from the point you're focusing on, and f being the force applied. It simplifies to basically be torque (force times distance), but mass isn't a weight so how can they be the same
If you assume gravity is constant at every point on the lever/masses it can be ignored, since it will be the same for both moments, when comparing them it will be divided out. If gravity were different on one side of the fulcrum you would need to take that into account and use mass not weight. :3
I agree with Otaku Fam. In order to find a center of mass, we compare things. Whether you use distance*force or distance*mass for a comparison is of no importance, just because it's only a comparison.
I mean (D1*F1)/(D2*F2) = (D1*F1*g)/(D2*F2*g) = (D1*M1)/(D2*M2)
wooow how amazing you are boy alot of thanksssssssssssss
make a video on gravitational potential energy
my only issue is finding the centroid and the shape opens downward on the x axis like
y=x
and
y=2x-4
Sir on your last example I thin you forgot to put 1/2 on the formula or am I wrong XD hehe
The step at 22:26 makes no sense. You cant take the x into the integral without a valid argument.
I’m here 22 min before my exam
thank you ever so much !!
what happened at 37:11?
I also did'nt understand at first. Only later did I realize he first calculated the inside of the square brackets [(...)*(...)] and only after he wrote the x that was in front, like this x*[(......)]. I agree it's desorienting.
Why is it so hard for lecturers to emulate the same stuff this guy is doing 🚶
Can you believe it if just sunlight alone by using moment it add. 544 m/s^2 acceleration
Thank you very much
still dont understand what is the different between center of mass and centroid
What is the reference of the center of mass formula ?
this is calculus 1 right?
You are godsent
well done
guys doesn't momunt means f.d.sin & momentum is m.v why did he say momunt is equal to m.d I'm so confuseddd
thank you!
Integration DX/2+x
Wow!! So helpful techniques, thank you so much Organic.. By the way you are you??😂😂😂
makes it easy
Well i don't know where our ½ "From the formula" go all of a sudden