It took years for SpaceX to get to this point? It has taken just as many years for Blue Origin to get to whatever point they are currently at, just without all the successes.
Blue Origin is NOT a viable competitor to Spacex!! Please present the facts honestly. Blue Origin does not have the manufacturing capability that SpaceX already has. The BE-4 engines are not in the same league as Spacex Raptors. Also the Raptors are becoming even more powerful and easier to manufacture
BlueSht no Blue BO :) Their MAJOR PROBLEM is not specifically the hardware. The company has done nothing to bring Americans’ attention towards them. The only real buzz was for the suborbital launcher failure, showing they had a crap QA program! BO, along with Firefly, have a “3rd stage” or kick stage to take the payload into different orbits with a system that can significantly change orbit and delta V. This tech is needed for lots of reasons. Take a lunar orbit where an F9 Heavy just can't give the payload the speed needed; these can add that needed controller. All that said, this rocket from BO changed a lot from the first build, like SpaceX, but they are not breaking any new ground; that's a big deal as a new rocket is needed sooner rather than later when Starship comes online. So, by 2026, to the moon, should NASA be ready.
Why are people so emotionally tied to who has the better rockets? This is like a cult of personality thing. The industry needs competition and the market will figure it out.
In the short term, only China's state supported múltiple companies will be the only serious competitors to Space X advancements. That will vary in the future but right now this is the main race.
BO is great at filing lawsuits and bullying their way into contracts, but so far...no so great at getting anything to orbit. Even IF this New Glenn flight is totally successful.....how long until the next one and at what cost? With new management coming into NASA and the DOD hopefully they won't be willing to spend 10x more for a NG launch than Falcon Heavy.
@@colonbina1 Why are you so negative toward everyone but SpaceX? Do you really want launch to be forever dominated by one company? No matter how well intentioned they began, monopolies have almost always ended up disastrous for the end user. Do you REALLY want that?
@@ssupernovae truth is not an opinion. The truth is that Starship will make other rockets obsolete because of the reusability and the cost. Until someone else can figure this out, other companies are years behind. Even New Glenn is obsolete before its first flight. They’re not working towards the future. They’re doing things that have been done before just a little bigger. So until other companies have a vision and can create instead of copy, SpaceX will dominate. Facts.
My question would be that even if everything goes perfect on this first New Glenn launch, how soon would New Glenn be able to come close to giving the quick service available with Space X? Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy can currently launch most of the missions that New Glenn would be capable of. By the time BO can produce enough New Glenn units to keep up with the Falcon family of rockets can. Plus Starship could be very much a viable carrier by then also. New Glenn could end up just an also ran, since other new heavy lift rockets being developed might also be coming on line soon. At that point, maybe New Glenn can replace New Sheppard, and carry tourists into LEO BO maybe the "Carnival" of the space tourism World.
Exactly! Lets get the Bezos rocket off the ground. Once they accomplish that then it's just a rocket company. 2025 SpaceX will attempt a moon landing. Bezos has a very long way to go to catch up.
So, A race to you is one side launching hundreds of flights and the other is not launching at all. But it’s a close race and the one that hasn’t launched at all is winning this little competition that you think is happening. Blue Origin is nothing.
BO is not nothing, yes space x is years ahead but BO is still a competitor... I'd rather have more companies trying to achieve new things than none at all
Couldn’t have said it better 🫡 there’s no comparison at the moment like comparing Jordan to a cockroach. 🤷 I’m a space fan an want all these companies to flourish but let’s be real in the meantime there is NO race. More like catchup…for everybody else #spaceX
Dude, Blue Origin is absolutely NOT A TITAN of the space industry, desperately far from it. If BO is a titan, then so is Rocket Labs, Sierra Space and FireFly. ESA and ULM are also more TITAN like compared to BO. Even with a successful, if it is indeed so with New Glenn, 1st flight BO still has leagues to catch up to be considered even a credible competitor. And while BO is still discovering how things work, SpaceX is already on model 2 of its largest space ship and a 3rd iteration is already in the making. Please, I implore you, stop using superlatives in places where they do not belong.
Agreed BO is absolute garbage, personally I think Sierra space, rocket labs is faaaar ahead of BO as far as productivity, they have less money but is putting out more than BO
@@majorkin19 I am in no position to determine whether BO is garbage or not. My beef is the labelling. TITAN is a big word; - it implies tried and tested AND compared performance and results. I am yet to see these in any substantially important context in comparison to SpaceX or any other company for that matter. In fact, SpaceX is demonstrably the TITAN standard globally ........ There simply is no other company (or state) that even hold a candle remotely to SpaceX. In short, I am trying to convey a proper use of terms .... BO is not a TITAN, nowhere close. I know Jeff Bezos thinks he may be a titan, if we speak of Amazon, sure, but as a bona fide space company, he has a few vaguely interestinng gadgets, no more. Certainly not a TITAN.
I hope all Blue Origin and SpaceX and RocketLab succeed!!! All the rockets they are developing have some unique capabilities and are very good designs.
I wish them all success, too. SpaceX and Rocket Lab have good designs. Blue Origin is yet to be proven. But even if the New Glenn is 100% successful, this isn't a "bold" move, or a "confident" move, it's a desperate one. If I were somebody who wanted to put a payload into space, I'd go with someone who's put in the time and testing, and succeeded with a few trial flights first. Unless I were desperate, too. What Bezos is doing isn't science or engineering. It's going "all in" on one roll of the dice.
@@dazuk1969NG is not even fully reusable now. it will take several years for BO to make it work 😂 starship can reach moon without refueling, it has more than enough dv for that, but with significantly less payload. the point of refueling is to increase payload. whats NG payload to moon? 3 tons?
Starship DOESNT have a market yet. There’s nobody building anything that needs a rocket that big except for spacex themselves with their own starlinks. I hate to break it to the fanboys, but you don’t make a profit when you’re your own client, that called an expense. There’s a reason why there was like a 4 year gap between the first and second flights of falcon heavy: nobody needs a rocket that big. The economy of scale thing didn’t prove true back then and I’m skeptical that it will now.
Blue Origin is in no way a competitor to spaceX. Maybe After a real launch - it might be a competitor IF and only IF they can do a seccond launch. The problem is that BO has not been able to even meet its obligations to ULA.
Blue Origin is not stepping out ahead of SpaceX. SpaceX has been in the business of launching satellites and other packages into space for the last 10 years. All Blue Origin has done so far is launched a flying phallus into sub-orbit like some kind of very expensive amusement park ride. I wish them well, but they are WAY behind the curve on this one...
I'm confused - B.O. lauching first ? - Advantage of preceeding Startship? What are you talking about ? OOOOHHH, I get it, launching before Startship filight SEVEN - AFTER the other 6 flights.
New Glenn started development at the same time as Falcon. Needless to say, they failed to keep up. I'm not a hater, though. I'd like to see New Glenn succeed, the more launch systems on the market, the better. But if they wait too long, or fail to succeed after taking so long to develop, they are in danger of getting bought out by a another space company wanting to get into the reusable rocket game.
I really don’t understand the Spacex fanboy cult. It’s possible to appreciate what they’re doing and enjoy their success while still living in reality. You don’t need to boo blue origin…
Exactly. Nobody likes a monopoly. Fanboys however, are fine with it because they're not interested in the technology, just the allure of celebrity. Open your minds.
Blue Origin is already showing it's 🐴. A Pro wouldn't risk a payload, reputation, and ridicule on an all-or-nothing first flight. This isn't boldness, it's desperation, loss of patience, and lack of judgement. Even if it's fully successful, it's a fool's errand. Send a live crew to the moon with your second launch, Jeff. THAT'LL show everyone!
Really, the BO engines look primitive compared to the new raptors. This is not to mention SpaceX has a production factory developed in tandem with Starship.
SpaceX is planning launch 7 of starship (second time a booster is caught on the launch pad). Blue Origin is hoping to launch the first New Glen but has no idea how it’ll do. Also, the two rockets are not comparable. Apples and oranges due to the scale of starships
Overall Bezos has several space flights (New Shepherd) and Spacex has several hundred. (Falcons, Heavy's Super Heavies, and various Starships, star hoppers etc).
@ yes, and? I did not say neither company has flown a rocket. Elon has said himself that Starship is like starting over compared to Falcon 9. Yes they can use experience but if they were similar then Starship wouldn’t need to test, it’d already be working flawlessly.
can you get any more clickbait , blue origin is only 5 years behind without getting that new tin can, off the ground at all , and you gonna match them against Space X ? lol which one would you get in right now ? Boeing learned hard way as well
BO is in no way a contender to SpaceX. They are years behind in cadence and technology. NG is not even the competitor for Falcon 9 or Starship in terms of mission design. The closest that thing NG is competing with is Falcon Heavy and how many launch has it done recently (2 this year, 5 last year, not exactly a prolific amount). Before you declare BO and NG the winner in whatever mythical race you've invented in your head, let's see what they can do first. Instead of cheerleading, you need to honestly report the situation and state that BO will certainly make a splash if they can get NG off the ground (without exploding) and land on it's drone ship successfully (without tipping over and/or exploding). The thing that grinds my gears about the type of "reporting" you are doing is that it isn't fact based. You're just spreading unneeded hype. Just report the facts and stop "Rah, Rahing" everything. There is already excitement to see what BO/NG can achieve. Your fake excitement isn't needed at all and in the end just makes you look foolish and unprofessional.
How are they two titans? BO hasn't launched anything but tourist rides- a fair ground attraction. Space X has generated an entire industry, they fly more equipment to orbit than most countries put together. It is not even close.
I agree. BO has pushed exactly ZERO grams to orbit. A more accurate phrasing would have been "Between the titan of the industry and the first likely challenger to the title." - Getting to orbit is a challenge that BO has yet to achieve with this "Run before you can walk" approach.
A little surprised that the FAA permitted an orbital launch of a second state which has not been flight proven. We really can't afford any orbital debris if things go wrong. One things people get wrong about this race is that New Glenn will have a larger faring than F9 and the non-reusable second state should make them more cost effective for GTO, GEO, and Lunar missions as well as some larger payloads. Not everything is going to LEO ( although BO and SX are targeting LEO for their constellation ). It will take a while to displace F9 as the reigning champ for LEO but others are chipping away at the market trying to open up their own niche.
I really like rocket lab, it is of course not as efficient as spacex, but it is a company that is moving forward step by step and with a lot of intelligence
I want to see all the rocket companies succeed however there will be those who get bought out by stronger companies fact of business, its frustrating waiting for a BO launch but i do wish them well.
Just to be clear, Blue Origin has been practicing rocket landings with their other, not quite space rocket, tourism toy rocket. Just not very often, in contrast with the SpaceX approach of fail fast, fail often, learn more, get better.
The long-term BS surrounding long-term failure BO is the only thing I find remarkable in any way about that company. I'd go so far as to predict that they are one more major mishap away, probably with this New Glenn thing, from shutting down entirely and giving up despite Bezos' vanity and billions. No serious space enthusiast channel should ever bother comparing BO to SpaceX. There is no comparison.
I'm an unabashed SpaceX fan, and Bezos annoys (especially that fake "tour" w\ Everyday Astronaut), I think there is a viable use for them as a partner to help the US win the current space race. I have to admit, I think it's an impressive rocket.
Too slow, too small, too late. IF they can get it off the platform and land it it, they will just become another mid-range launch service provider ... yawn. If it blows up, how many years will it take them to roll out another ?
I'll be happy to see Blue Origin actually launch something into orbit for once, but I don't even see how the company might be profitable by this point, let alone compete with SpaceX. About a decade ago BO decided that ULA's development style was superior and they have had to stick with that. However, SpaceX threw that notion out the window almost a decade ago now and it worked. Rocket Lab is a much more legitimate competitor to SpaceX than Blue Origin will ever be.
SEW - join, fasten, or repair (something) by making stitches with a needle and thread or a sewing machine. SUE - to institute a process in law against; bring a civil action against. to sue someone for damages
Blue origin has been working on New Glen for over 12 years now. They Bazzos has spent more money in 12 years on one rocket than Spacex has spent since 2003. They have no excuse but to have everything work to perfection on January 6th. Especially when you consider what Spacex has achieved in the same time frame. There is no comparison.
But SpaceX will have effectively destroyed seven launches and still not reached orbit with Starship. So if BO succeed on their first go, they've saved the money by not blowing up or crashing six flights first. I'm cheering on SpaceX, though getting Project Kuiper up there will give competition to the Starlink terminals which should be really helpful in pushing the technologies forward and bringing the cost down. And having more competing companies in rockets should reduce the cost to orbit (hopefully in time for me to be able to go up one day)
@@makingmusiconline2309 technically Starship could have reached orbit by now, but that’s not the main objective. They have already proven themselves in building a rocket capable of orbit. BO has never reached that milestone. Also, the price to build a full starship and booster is a fraction of the cost to what New Glenn is. And Starlink is covering much of the cost for R&D
8:41 they made reusable second stage prototype already, but the goal for now is to take rocket to space. also they were trying to recover fairings after simulated drop from helicopter and succeded. disinformation, clickbait videos, no arguments, blind spacex fanity.
Having a captive market in Amazon's project Kuiper significantly alters Blue Origin's potential when compared with other competitors except SpaceX. I guess Amazon is happy to pay a premium over SpaceX launch costs to have their own launcher. It remains to be seen if they can achieve a high enough launch cadence to offset Starlink's first mover and initial coverage advantages. I would be interested to see a video with a feature comparison between Kuiper and Starlink.
This what Space X sounds like to regular people.. Bezos: to expect success would be insane. Anything after clearing the tower is a huge accomplishment.
New Glen is not a competitor to SpaceX in any way shape or form, merely another wanabe player to be used as an alternative because a customer doesn't want to wait for a slot on a SpaceX flight
While I wish Blue Origin the best, I feel they have less than a 50% of hitting all this major goals (orbit, release, return, landing). I feel they have so much more to lose than to gain with this first flight with a payload.
I really can't agree with your probably statement. Starship already has a long track record of reusable boosters with their falcon 9 and they've already demonstrated they've returned to launch point and catch with the super heavy Blue origin hasn't launched anything anywhere yet with anything. It has a reputation so far of absolutely zero. Spacex on the other hand, has demonstrated every step of the super heavy and starship at every stage of its development. Well, it's certainly possible that New Glenn will fly and perform flawlessly on its very first flight of any kind, the probability of that outcome is so low as to be improbable. And frankly the irresponsibility of trying to launch an expensive payload on flight 1 boggles the mind. Not to mention calling to question the oversight and responsibility of the payload owner. That's just my two cents though.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
How the hell is Blue Origin a titan? Its just a huge tax deduction for Bezos.
New Glenn is on the verge of being obsolete before it achieves any real kind of launch cadence.
No way BO, can get ahead of SpaceX.
It took years for SpaceX to get to this point? It has taken just as many years for Blue Origin to get to whatever point they are currently at, just without all the successes.
Blue Origin is nearly 25 years old and has never been to orbit. So, yeah, no comparison at all.
Blue Origin is NOT a viable competitor to Spacex!! Please present the facts honestly. Blue Origin does not have the manufacturing capability that SpaceX already has. The BE-4 engines are not in the same league as Spacex Raptors. Also the Raptors are becoming even more powerful and easier to manufacture
I could not have said this better, SpaceX has no serious contender.
Lmao
Markets will determine their success....and government contracts. Satellite companies don't care what lifts them into orbit, only what it costs
BlueSht no Blue BO :)
Their MAJOR PROBLEM is not specifically the hardware. The company has done nothing to bring Americans’ attention towards them. The only real buzz was for the suborbital launcher failure, showing they had a crap QA program!
BO, along with Firefly, have a “3rd stage” or kick stage to take the payload into different orbits with a system that can significantly change orbit and delta V. This tech is needed for lots of reasons. Take a lunar orbit where an F9 Heavy just can't give the payload the speed needed; these can add that needed controller.
All that said, this rocket from BO changed a lot from the first build, like SpaceX, but they are not breaking any new ground; that's a big deal as a new rocket is needed sooner rather than later when Starship comes online. So, by 2026, to the moon, should NASA be ready.
Why are people so emotionally tied to who has the better rockets? This is like a cult of personality thing. The industry needs competition and the market will figure it out.
BO is not a titan nor will ever be.
two titans???? are you kidding me there is only one Titan and that is Space X
I wouldn't call Blue Origin a titan.
In the short term, only China's state supported múltiple companies will be the only serious competitors to Space X advancements. That will vary in the future but right now this is the main race.
New Glenn will take the lead? Launching 1 rocket is not really taking the lead, is it?
There's no comparison....even if Old Glenn is completely successful with it's maiden flight, SpaceX
is already Far ahead.
Cost per flight, payload cost to space and payload mass, turn around time. This game was lost by Blue Origin several years ago.
Agree👍
BO is great at filing lawsuits and bullying their way into contracts, but so far...no so great at getting anything to orbit. Even IF this New Glenn flight is totally successful.....how long until the next one and at what cost? With new management coming into NASA and the DOD hopefully they won't be willing to spend 10x more for a NG launch than Falcon Heavy.
When Starship succeeds, it will replace them all.
@@colonbina1 Why are you so negative toward everyone but SpaceX? Do you really want launch to be forever dominated by one company? No matter how well intentioned they began, monopolies have almost always ended up disastrous for the end user. Do you REALLY want that?
@@ssupernovae truth is not an opinion. The truth is that Starship will make other rockets obsolete because of the reusability and the cost. Until someone else can figure this out, other companies are years behind. Even New Glenn is obsolete before its first flight. They’re not working towards the future. They’re doing things that have been done before just a little bigger. So until other companies have a vision and can create instead of copy, SpaceX will dominate. Facts.
It would be great to see Blue succeed.
Starship fans will be spitting feathers. Dont forget they have done 6 launches and got a banana into space...
My question would be that even if everything goes perfect on this first New Glenn launch, how soon would New Glenn be able to come close to giving the quick service available with Space X? Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy can currently launch most of the missions that New Glenn would be capable of. By the time BO can produce enough New Glenn units to keep up with the Falcon family of rockets can. Plus Starship could be very much a viable carrier by then also. New Glenn could end up just an also ran, since other new heavy lift rockets being developed might also be coming on line soon. At that point, maybe New Glenn can replace New Sheppard, and carry tourists into LEO
BO maybe the "Carnival" of the space tourism World.
Two Titans.... I don't think that can be said for a company still trying to launch New Glenn for the first time.
Exactly! Lets get the Bezos rocket off the ground. Once they accomplish that then it's just a rocket company.
2025 SpaceX will attempt a moon landing. Bezos has a very long way to go to catch up.
👍👍👍
@@oxroush exactly. Or has yet to reach orbit as a company
I give new Glenn a 25% chance of successfully flying into space and back down landing on its drone ship without exploding .
No competition at all how long will it take him to get another rocket up😊
Good luck to Blue Origin. Don't forget it took you years to build 1 ship. Don't screw it up.
So, A race to you is one side launching hundreds of flights and the other is not launching at all. But it’s a close race and the one that hasn’t launched at all is winning this little competition that you think is happening. Blue Origin is nothing.
BO is not nothing, yes space x is years ahead but BO is still a competitor... I'd rather have more companies trying to achieve new things than none at all
Thanks for your great comment👍
Couldn’t have said it better 🫡 there’s no comparison at the moment like comparing Jordan to a cockroach. 🤷 I’m a space fan an want all these companies to flourish but let’s be real in the meantime there is NO race. More like catchup…for everybody else #spaceX
Blue Origin will be closer than anyone to being a SpaceX competitor once New Glenn gets a couple flights under its belt.
@@mig4868
If it gets a couple of successful launches!
Dude, Blue Origin is absolutely NOT A TITAN of the space industry, desperately far from it. If BO is a titan, then so is Rocket Labs, Sierra Space and FireFly. ESA and ULM are also more TITAN like compared to BO. Even with a successful, if it is indeed so with New Glenn, 1st flight BO still has leagues to catch up to be considered even a credible competitor. And while BO is still discovering how things work, SpaceX is already on model 2 of its largest space ship and a 3rd iteration is already in the making. Please, I implore you, stop using superlatives in places where they do not belong.
Agreed BO is absolute garbage, personally I think Sierra space, rocket labs is faaaar ahead of BO as far as productivity, they have less money but is putting out more than BO
@@majorkin19 I am in no position to determine whether BO is garbage or not. My beef is the labelling. TITAN is a big word; - it implies tried and tested AND compared performance and results. I am yet to see these in any substantially important context in comparison to SpaceX or any other company for that matter. In fact, SpaceX is demonstrably the TITAN standard globally ........ There simply is no other company (or state) that even hold a candle remotely to SpaceX. In short, I am trying to convey a proper use of terms .... BO is not a TITAN, nowhere close. I know Jeff Bezos thinks he may be a titan, if we speak of Amazon, sure, but as a bona fide space company, he has a few vaguely interestinng gadgets, no more. Certainly not a TITAN.
I hope all Blue Origin and SpaceX and RocketLab succeed!!! All the rockets they are developing have some unique capabilities and are very good designs.
I wish them all success, too.
SpaceX and Rocket Lab have good designs. Blue Origin is yet to be proven.
But even if the New Glenn is 100% successful, this isn't a "bold" move, or a "confident" move, it's a desperate one. If I were somebody who wanted to put a payload into space, I'd go with someone who's put in the time and testing, and succeeded with a few trial flights first. Unless I were desperate, too. What Bezos is doing isn't science or engineering. It's going "all in" on one roll of the dice.
iT'S ALL ABOUT COST OF FLIGHT. Spacex is way ahead.
If anything, New Glenn may be a competitor for Falcon 9, or even Falcon Heavy. It is no competition for Starship. 😕🤷♂
@@dazuk1969NG is not even fully reusable now. it will take several years for BO to make it work 😂
starship can reach moon without refueling, it has more than enough dv for that, but with significantly less payload. the point of refueling is to increase payload.
whats NG payload to moon? 3 tons?
@@doodocina "straship can reach the moon without refuelling"....you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about you 🤡
@@dazuk1969cite, because bo is crap.
Starship DOESNT have a market yet. There’s nobody building anything that needs a rocket that big except for spacex themselves with their own starlinks. I hate to break it to the fanboys, but you don’t make a profit when you’re your own client, that called an expense. There’s a reason why there was like a 4 year gap between the first and second flights of falcon heavy: nobody needs a rocket that big. The economy of scale thing didn’t prove true back then and I’m skeptical that it will now.
@ fly starship is cheaper than f9 in case of full reusability, isn't it?
Blue Origin is in no way a competitor to spaceX. Maybe After a real launch - it might be a competitor IF and only IF they can do a seccond launch. The problem is that BO has not been able to even meet its obligations to ULA.
Which obligations to ULA have not been met?
Blue Origin is not stepping out ahead of SpaceX. SpaceX has been in the business of launching satellites and other packages into space for the last 10 years. All Blue Origin has done so far is launched a flying phallus into sub-orbit like some kind of very expensive amusement park ride. I wish them well, but they are WAY behind the curve on this one...
I've not seen Elon on one of his own vehicles.
Blue Origin is competition for Boeing's Starliner
That will be extremely tense competition🤣🤣🤣
I really hope Blue Origin can be successful. As we all know, competition is a good thing for all industries. Looking forward to the next space race!!
BO doesn’t need a spotlight. They have Amazon money. They can go as long as Bezos is alive.
I'm confused - B.O. lauching first ? - Advantage of preceeding Startship? What are you talking about ? OOOOHHH, I get it, launching before Startship filight SEVEN - AFTER the other 6 flights.
New Glenn started development at the same time as Falcon. Needless to say, they failed to keep up.
I'm not a hater, though. I'd like to see New Glenn succeed, the more launch systems on the market, the better. But if they wait too long, or fail to succeed after taking so long to develop, they are in danger of getting bought out by a another space company wanting to get into the reusable rocket game.
"BOOM" Goes the "BLUE ORIGIN", a nice explosion in space.
I don't hope any failure happens
I really don’t understand the Spacex fanboy cult. It’s possible to appreciate what they’re doing and enjoy their success while still living in reality. You don’t need to boo blue origin…
Exactly. Nobody likes a monopoly. Fanboys however, are fine with it because they're not interested in the technology, just the allure of celebrity. Open your minds.
taking the lead ,🤣they will beat 400 falcons and 6 starships,with the one flight,😂🤣
I bet Elon is shaking with fear over this!!, NOT...
For what is worth, I hope BO succeeds. The competition it will bring will serve to remind SpaceX to not become complacent. A little.
Blue Origin is already showing it's 🐴.
A Pro wouldn't risk a payload, reputation, and ridicule on an all-or-nothing first flight. This isn't boldness, it's desperation, loss of patience, and lack of judgement. Even if it's fully successful, it's a fool's errand. Send a live crew to the moon with your second launch, Jeff. THAT'LL show everyone!
Really, the BO engines look primitive compared to the new raptors. This is not to mention SpaceX has a production factory developed in tandem with Starship.
Love your videos.
SpaceX is planning launch 7 of starship (second time a booster is caught on the launch pad). Blue Origin is hoping to launch the first New Glen but has no idea how it’ll do. Also, the two rockets are not comparable. Apples and oranges due to the scale of starships
Overall Bezos has several space flights (New Shepherd) and Spacex has several hundred. (Falcons, Heavy's Super Heavies, and various Starships, star hoppers etc).
@ yes, and? I did not say neither company has flown a rocket. Elon has said himself that Starship is like starting over compared to Falcon 9. Yes they can use experience but if they were similar then Starship wouldn’t need to test, it’d already be working flawlessly.
Possible New Glenn will be 100% successful and SS flight 7 will explode. Pigs might fly.
A bet?
can you get any more clickbait , blue origin is only 5 years behind without getting that new tin can, off the ground at all , and you gonna match them against Space X ? lol which one would you get in right now ? Boeing learned hard way as well
BO is in no way a contender to SpaceX. They are years behind in cadence and technology. NG is not even the competitor for Falcon 9 or Starship in terms of mission design. The closest that thing NG is competing with is Falcon Heavy and how many launch has it done recently (2 this year, 5 last year, not exactly a prolific amount).
Before you declare BO and NG the winner in whatever mythical race you've invented in your head, let's see what they can do first. Instead of cheerleading, you need to honestly report the situation and state that BO will certainly make a splash if they can get NG off the ground (without exploding) and land on it's drone ship successfully (without tipping over and/or exploding). The thing that grinds my gears about the type of "reporting" you are doing is that it isn't fact based. You're just spreading unneeded hype. Just report the facts and stop "Rah, Rahing" everything. There is already excitement to see what BO/NG can achieve. Your fake excitement isn't needed at all and in the end just makes you look foolish and unprofessional.
unless theyve been launching a dozen of these and never told anyone, it'll be a miracle it doesnt explode, hopefully in the air
How are they two titans?
BO hasn't launched anything but tourist rides- a fair ground attraction. Space X has generated an entire industry, they fly more equipment to orbit than most countries put together. It is not even close.
I agree. BO has pushed exactly ZERO grams to orbit. A more accurate phrasing would have been "Between the titan of the industry and the first likely challenger to the title." - Getting to orbit is a challenge that BO has yet to achieve with this "Run before you can walk" approach.
👍👍👍
Godspeed to Blue Origin New Glenn❣️
money talks cost of blue origin rocket launch cost isnt close to spacex launch cost
Yeah all them failed starship flights are not cheap.
But this would be a rival to Falcon 9 not starship.... Absolutely a none story.
Thanks for your comment 👍
A little surprised that the FAA permitted an orbital launch of a second state which has not been flight proven. We really can't afford any orbital debris if things go wrong. One things people get wrong about this race is that New Glenn will have a larger faring than F9 and the non-reusable second state should make them more cost effective for GTO, GEO, and Lunar missions as well as some larger payloads. Not everything is going to LEO ( although BO and SX are targeting LEO for their constellation ). It will take a while to displace F9 as the reigning champ for LEO but others are chipping away at the market trying to open up their own niche.
"Headstart" ... I spilled so much coffee you should buy me a new one......
I really like rocket lab, it is of course not as efficient as spacex, but it is a company that is moving forward step by step and with a lot of intelligence
Yes, it is the second most launched company after SpaceX in the US
B.O. is on flight 1 compared to SpaceX flight 7. It will be a long time before B.O, can even come close to the accomplishments of SpaceX
True!! That is a long way
Let’s see if they can launch once a week
I want to see all the rocket companies succeed however there will be those who get bought out by stronger companies fact of business, its frustrating waiting for a BO launch but i do wish them well.
Wait, hold up... Two Titans? I know only one, SpaceX. Who's the other? Surely not Blue Origin. 🤨 What an insult to SpaceX.
Just to be clear, Blue Origin has been practicing rocket landings with their other, not quite space rocket, tourism toy rocket. Just not very often, in contrast with the SpaceX approach of fail fast, fail often, learn more, get better.
Jared is not the NASA administrator. He has only been nominated by Trump. That doesn’t mean he automatically gets appointed.
The long-term BS surrounding long-term failure BO is the only thing I find remarkable in any way about that company. I'd go so far as to predict that they are one more major mishap away, probably with this New Glenn thing, from shutting down entirely and giving up despite Bezos' vanity and billions.
No serious space enthusiast channel should ever bother comparing BO to SpaceX. There is no comparison.
I'm an unabashed SpaceX fan, and Bezos annoys (especially that fake "tour" w\ Everyday Astronaut), I think there is a viable use for them as a partner to help the US win the current space race. I have to admit, I think it's an impressive rocket.
SpaceX is launching a Falcon 9 around 9pm est from KSC tonight...
Will blue origin reach 25 launches or more this year
Too slow, too small, too late. IF they can get it off the platform and land it it, they will just become another mid-range launch service provider ... yawn.
If it blows up, how many years will it take them to roll out another ?
Great analysis 👍
I'll be happy to see Blue Origin actually launch something into orbit for once, but I don't even see how the company might be profitable by this point, let alone compete with SpaceX. About a decade ago BO decided that ULA's development style was superior and they have had to stick with that. However, SpaceX threw that notion out the window almost a decade ago now and it worked. Rocket Lab is a much more legitimate competitor to SpaceX than Blue Origin will ever be.
This will be flight 1 for B.O. This will be flight 7 for SpaceX. What exactly is the competition.? Will Jeffo sew himself if things don't go right.
And with 7 launches what have they achieved exactly, sending a banana. 60s tech was sending people to the moon.
SEW - join, fasten, or repair (something) by making stitches with a needle and thread or a sewing machine.
SUE - to institute a process in law against; bring a civil action against. to sue someone for damages
I agree with you Kevin. God Bless to all.
Thanks for your great support ❤️
What a load of bullshit! How much did you get paid for this "puff piece"?
They're just a little late to the dance. Hopefully, all goes well.
🚀🚀🚀
Priorities must be safety and success. If Blue’s priority is beating its rivals, then it’s focus is completely wrong and will fail.
For sure that's not their primary focus. But media likes to make a fight or a race out of everything.
dude compares two completely different launch vehicles and calls one better than the other... No shit one is gonna differ from the other
There is no comparison.
😅😅
Blue origin has been working on New Glen for over 12 years now. They Bazzos has spent more money in 12 years on one rocket than Spacex has spent since 2003. They have no excuse but to have everything work to perfection on January 6th. Especially when you consider what Spacex has achieved in the same time frame. There is no comparison.
👍👍👍
I don't think New Glenn is in anyway a meaningful threat to F9s market dominance. On the other hand it could be the end of ULA.
I don't think BO has even the slightest possibility of being a meaningful contender
Can't possibly out shine Space at any level
The Fanboyness is strong in this one...
The Old Glen Rocket!
I hope the New Glenn rocket can do this!
Hope they don't flop running to fast to catch up ... good to have options and competition.
Its gonna be either a zoom or boom and a wait and see for me ! My other question would be how long will it take to build a new glenn 2 ?
But SpaceX will have effectively destroyed seven launches and still not reached orbit with Starship. So if BO succeed on their first go, they've saved the money by not blowing up or crashing six flights first. I'm cheering on SpaceX, though getting Project Kuiper up there will give competition to the Starlink terminals which should be really helpful in pushing the technologies forward and bringing the cost down. And having more competing companies in rockets should reduce the cost to orbit (hopefully in time for me to be able to go up one day)
@@makingmusiconline2309 technically Starship could have reached orbit by now, but that’s not the main objective. They have already proven themselves in building a rocket capable of orbit. BO has never reached that milestone. Also, the price to build a full starship and booster is a fraction of the cost to what New Glenn is. And Starlink is covering much of the cost for R&D
Good Video!
It makes a difference whether you take a 13m rocket up to 100km and land again, or a 58m high first stage on a sea platform
8:41 they made reusable second stage prototype already, but the goal for now is to take rocket to space.
also they were trying to recover fairings after simulated drop from helicopter and succeded. disinformation, clickbait videos, no arguments, blind spacex fanity.
Except bo stinks for ignoring bernoulli.
@ lmao good one
Having a captive market in Amazon's project Kuiper significantly alters Blue Origin's potential when compared with other competitors except SpaceX. I guess Amazon is happy to pay a premium over SpaceX launch costs to have their own launcher. It remains to be seen if they can achieve a high enough launch cadence to offset Starlink's first mover and initial coverage advantages. I would be interested to see a video with a feature comparison between Kuiper and Starlink.
This what Space X sounds like to regular people..
Bezos: to expect success would be insane. Anything after clearing the tower is a huge accomplishment.
New glenn will either be a zoom or a boom !
It's too late to fail now!
What Showdown? not even close
BLUE ORIGIN, LEADING FROM WAY BEHIND !!!!!!!!!!!
New Glen is not a competitor to SpaceX in any way shape or form, merely another wanabe player to be used as an alternative because a customer doesn't want to wait for a slot on a SpaceX flight
😂
Let's wait 3 days from now and see the results of the New Glenn......
While I wish Blue Origin the best, I feel they have less than a 50% of hitting all this major goals (orbit, release, return, landing). I feel they have so much more to lose than to gain with this first flight with a payload.
I think it appropriate that M Besos’ team initials are B. O. In the UK toss initials stand for Body Odour!
.
Can you tell more detail about that?
And why are they launching someone's space craft on their first try ? I don't think they'll ever reach orbit .
The difference between SpaceX and BO is the difference between scientists building a rocket and engineers building spaceships.
Yeah
Souped up falcon 9 is glen new
The New lawn dart
Great channel Elon
Should rename this channel ”Space X fanboys” channel 😂
I really can't agree with your probably statement. Starship already has a long track record of reusable boosters with their falcon 9 and they've already demonstrated they've returned to launch point and catch with the super heavy Blue origin hasn't launched anything anywhere yet with anything. It has a reputation so far of absolutely zero. Spacex on the other hand, has demonstrated every step of the super heavy and starship at every stage of its development. Well, it's certainly possible that New Glenn will fly and perform flawlessly on its very first flight of any kind, the probability of that outcome is so low as to be improbable. And frankly the irresponsibility of trying to launch an expensive payload on flight 1 boggles the mind. Not to mention calling to question the oversight and responsibility of the payload owner. That's just my two cents though.
Thanks for your analysis
Bro your clickbait doesn't work. Got a comment off me though.
Payload on maiden flight is a tightwad plan. Which flight of SpaceX had a "paying" payload? As for launch, I will believe it when I see it....
So Where is Blues crew capsule???
I still think urine cooled membrane/metallic heat shield would be the best option.