@@boxcarz Also, if the soldier had "One Man Army" he can actually change his kit in as fast as 3 seconds, giving him access to the entire 18th century arsenal. He can be a sniper, grenadier, shotgunner, or even man cannoneer(man-portable two-pounder).
lol. Good one. But In all seriousness, as a black poweder flintlock shooter, throwing powder and a paper cartridge down the barrel vs cartridge with a lead round ball is totally different. Especially after a couple of shots. Fouling in the barrel make rates of fire go way down.
@@jimmeerpohl8094 that's if you are fighting a skirmish. In line battles, rate of fire and musket volleys determine victory. But yes, skirmishers vs line formation, latter often has advantage.
@@theguru18 if some one can reload faster then most it could be a good idea to use them as light infantry instead of line infantry. Every one wasnt fighting in ranks
Yep, he overfilled the pan there, it would seem. I noticed he wasn't blowing the pan clean before every time he'd prime either, odds are too much powder piled up eventually.
@@tortuga4874, easy there ASShpee....., do you not see a joke when it is coming through the cross hairs at you and, you only have time to half blink... BANG!!
That my friend, is a Hangfire. Touchole partially clogged or a slow burning spark. If you take it off your shoulder too fast that is the result you get.
@@observantmagic4156 so you think everyone should just follow orders and Obey rules and not question anything I'm not going to touch the low-hanging fruit that most people mention when regarding following orders rules blindly Cover if you do not see how the indoctrinated mentality of follow the rules buddy is in our society for the express reason of control over the actions and thought of people then you are as blind as a Clydesdale Know what your right follow the rules buddy right so any person that gets caught speeding 20 kilometres over even if they didn't hurt anyone any person under 21 that got caught with one beer or any person that just gets caught breaking any arbitrary law Deserves to be punished to the full extent of that law of course right because every single law is just and none of them are wrong that's the society we live in Now I don't think that you are stupid enough to think that however I do think that you are a little bit of a bootlicker and you have that all we need to follow rules mentality ingrained into you somewhere Now I assume you have the same opinions on the Comal right everyone should be forced to wear masks there's nothing wrong with being forced right if it's for the greater good If you ever break Gathering guidelines of totally Jasper police officers to force their way into your home Business owners honestly should be ticketed and arrested for staying open they're just silly responsible Baby now you're starting to understand why we shouldn't comply blindly with anything the government or an authority figure says look up the Milgram experiment Law has never made man a whit more just but due to his respect for it even the well-disposed our daily made agents of Injustice Henry David Thoreau From Emma goldmans essay anarchism what it really stands for 1913
this may look easy, but remember this is done outside of combat, just imagine trying to fire three shots under 1 minute, when you are standing in the open and lines of enemies are shooting back along with cannon balls hitting around you, and then suddenly you hear trumpet sounds and comes a mass cavalry charge.
Yeah well, then you have 200 more musketeers by your side, everyone reloading. 10-20 seconds later, when the cavalry is 50-70 meters away, you hear your own commander shouting "TAKE AIM! FIREEE!!" And you and all the other musketeers shoot and kill 90% of the cavalry in one devastating mass fire blast ^^ Imagine that! And then about 50 amored foot soldiers with spears comes from behind to topple and kill the rest of the cavalry.
@@123TauruZ321 this is why you use cavalry to outflank and charge the rear. only box formation can save these lads at which point they become immobile.
@@ImperialDiecast Box formation it is then. It doesn't really matter how the cavalry charge. Just adapt to their strategy. But in all seriousness, i think the cavalry would have better strategy charging in bulk, right in the middle, because if the musketeers start having to crossfire on themselves, that's a big disadvantage.
@@silverletter4551 no, they didn't thats a short land parent musket from around the 1760's to 1770's repeating wepons were limited to lorenzonis which even then weren't really that repeating
+jjohnston94 that generally didn't happen a lot in history, if you think about it it makes perfect sense, coordinating 80 men in two ranks to firing together would be impossible under fire past say, the second volley. People generally don't like to die, so they routed pretty quickly once they say dozens of men diying.
+tbone martinez Usually one side or another would bayonet charge after two or three volleys of the other didn't break. Apparently the reason the American civil war's early battles were so bloody was because they didn't charge, just repeatedly shot vollies.
There were other commands that could be given other than a general company or squad-level volley fire that would provide coordinated fire from a two-rank formation of trained soldiers, such as fire by rank (front rank either standing or kneeling), fire by file (from the left or right as directed), or if the din of battle got too much for continued shouted commands, the ever popular "fire at will".
@Mr. Somebody Muskets were indeed very inaccurate beyond 100 yards,with an extreme range of 300 yards for the Brown Bess,that's the reason why all battles using line tactics(basically from Maurice of Nassau's time to Napoleons's III 1870's army)were fought at a range of 50 to 100 yards,you can hardly miss hundreds and hundreds of massed infantry in front of you firing 1-3 volleys from a .75 cal weapon. Even without a clear LOS,you need to maintain firepower and discipline to stay in line,and that's what precisely distinguished Marlborough and Frederick II of Prussia armies. Don't know what sources tbone martinez used,but there's plenty of primary historical documents concerning battle accounts from the 16th to 18th century in Europe that tell otherwise. Modern estimates according to Cumpston, Mike. "The Guns of Empire: 18th Century Martial Muskets" Guns Magazine, August 2008, p. 60. FMG Publications, San Diego, CA put the accuracy at 75% at 175 yards.Yes,yards.
No. England would be drinking coffee because this guy wasn't even ramming a projectile down the muzzle. You would have seen a 51 star American flag draped at The Who and Def Leppard concerts.
+Military History Visualized Oh, what a coincidence I found you here! Do you think we'll ever get a episode about the Napoleonic wars? Or the times of the muskets overall?
@@MilitaryHistoryVisualized Really enjoy your channel. As an American, it's fascinating to get your perspective on history and military studies. Thanks for all the great content!
@@arthurmorgan7645 i wanna go back in time to the 1700s, train a squad of 50 men to use m16s, id give them 100k rounds and teach them about modern firearm technology. Simply knowing somthing is possible makes it easier to achive and with the knowlege behind how the firearms and ammunition work, who knows what technological advancements may come. Keep in mind, this is assuming i have a time machine and the money to supply the above mentioned supplies.
They didn't stand apart from each other and fire back towards one another one by one, they fought in formations. Colonial era armies used rotations whereupon firing the first volley, the ones who shot would move to the back of the line and the ones behind would rush forward and shoot their round. This repeated until either some tactical advantage was secured, the enemy line was severely crushed, or they ran out of ammo, and then they commenced a bayonet charge.
@@30AndHatingIt i can agree with the last part.. but it ain’t that bad, it could be worse it’s already better than last year in my opinion. Could be because some messed up things happened to me last year. But we’ll get through 2021 mate! Hang in there
@@landonray9517 " its so last year " No full auto in the building will always be a meme , consider it an age test .... dont think its funny anymore ? That means you're too old . Lando Cal "Ray"sian ? This deals getting worse all the time !
@@orsonincharge4879 It's a meme, but not all memes are funny. Especially when they're overused as much as this one. I just get sick of going onto firearms videos and seeing kids like him try to be "witty" and "funny" by throwing in the same overused meme.
Finally! Someone who has actually practiced! I've been trying to find how fast trained musketmen would be able to fire for ages but all I keep finding is people taking eight minutes to load the first shot. Thank you 2007
I presume this was a competition and this would be against the rules, but if rate of fire was really important, I'd think you'd just hold the ramrod between rounds, saving the time of insertion and removal. Probably save 3-5 seconds per round so he could easily do 4 rounds per minute.
With my 45 cal black powder plainsman I can do three in a minute and a half while seated in the back of a suburban and hit everything I aim at. My best friend chuckled every time his buddy was surprised who was in the front seat with a semi automatic rifle who didn’t get a shot off because I was taking them. Snooze you lose.
The prussian army ,after the naoleonic wars i believe, started training the soldiers 6 shots a minute. It was impossible to hit 6 consistently but the point was to get the soldiers to shoot one more time than the enemy in the same time span.
Now imagine what it would have been like to have three rows of men that could load and fire this fast, staggering the shots row-to-row so that they have a near continuous rate of fire. It'd be something incredible to behold--or terrifying, depending on where you're standing.
It turns out that two rows of soldiers are sufficient (the famous thin red line). One aimed 50-80 yard shot every 10 seconds from the file of two men in each two-yard frontage is the practical maximum due to the time it takes for the clouds of powder smoke to thin when there's little or no breeze. When smokeless powder and percussion caps were invented, the rate of fire could go up once more although by then rifled muskets were also more common. The rifling meant that aimed shots could be taken at up to 200 yards, which imposed a new limit on the practical rate of fire. Of course if your enemy is approaching en masse, like in a Napoleonic column, then at 50 yards you don't need to spend any time aiming and can just fire into the smoke.
@@RichWoods23 smokeless powder isn't used with percussion caps homes. cap and ball still used blackpowder. minie balls also had a 500 yard range in the Civil War. i doubt you could put a cap on faster than this bloke was priming his pan either.
I’d be standing behind a tree so I didn’t get shot. Never could understand their tactics…standing out in the open to be gunned down. Was that “honorable”?
@@edadan Oh, there's plenty of reasons for why blackpowder tactics wen the way they did. These days, it seems silly to be standing in the open while you get shot, but we have the advantage of modern weaponry and technology. Consider that the musket was an inaccurate weapon, which, while still deadly if it hits, is ineffective in small numbers. If a regiment of 100 men were all diving for cover, their shots would be spread thin. Cram those 100 men into a column, however, and you can have a concentrated volley of fire that's much more likely to do something to the enemy. As well, a column of men is much easier to command than a bunch of loosely dispersed men. They can follow simple instructions and movements in tandem with one another, while dispersed men would have to be rounded up and told what to do. Keeping in mind this is while the battlefield is covered in defining fire from both muskets and cannon. (As an aside, this is why drummers were so important--their drums communicated orders to the regiment, and were loud enough to be heard over the din. Besides, if you miss it, you can just follow the guys next to you.) Lastly, it's an unfortunately common misconception that people back in the day were either too stupid or too caught up in honor to fight battles smartly. In reality, people back then were just as smart as people today--they just had access to less information than we do now. The reality is that they put a lot of thought into the ways they fought wars, and were generally pretty good at what they did. Sure, their tactics would eventually stop working as the nature of war evolved, but that's always been the case. Someday, people will probably look back at us and call us ridiculous for how we fight wars.
Once the infantry formation was broken they could be run down by cavalry. Hiding behind a tree may avoid being shot, but the enemy isn't going to try to shoot you.
@@EvgeneXI look it up, they har a pretty substancial army and where known for their discipline and drill. I guess they started with it loaded and started the timer with the first shot
@@Lappmogel So I had a look. Kind of what I expected, although I’m surprised it’s even manageable at all even if it’s only during drill. TL;DR: . During drill armies could manage 4-5 rpm, Prussian managed 6. . During battle few armies managed more than 2 - 3 rpm. “By 1750, most European armies were fascinated with the speed of fire demonstrated by the Prussian troops in the War of Austrian Succession. Austrian military veterans and theorists saw that their troops could fire 4-5 rounds a minute on the drill square, basically matching the Prussian drill square ideal.[3] Prussian troops were capable of firing six rounds a minute, but could not maintain that pace for any length of time. Lossow comments, "Altogether, it would be too much to expect troops to maintain six rounds a minute for an extended time." It seems that troops in combat fired more slowly. Two rounds a minute is a very believable figure for well-trained, veteran troops in combat. Austrian army officer Jakob Cogniazzo gives us a window into this idea: Now, how many rounds of rapid fire do you think he can loose off in a minute when he is in a minute when he is in this condition? At least five a minute? That is certainly the norm for fire on the drill square, which conjures up visions of enemy corpses by the thousand. But, when we consider all the encumbering burden of the soldier... taking everything into due account, it would be optimistic to suppose that he fires as many as one or at the most two rounds a minute [in combat].”
@@user-vr5sc7zj1s Now, now. We are still locked up tight where we are, can't even go to parks or play golf, don't go giving me ideas. 46 seconds and everyone's problems would be over.
Trained Infantry soldiers in the 18th century could fire 4 to 5 round per minute, they just had to have a top and bottom tooth. Pennsylvania rifles used by the Americans were far more accurate(up to 300 or so yards) than a smooth bore musket but took longer to load, both muskets and rifles had their advantages and disadvantages
+Edward Treu No, imagine you and your opponent are the last ones standing. Both of you realize you're "empty" and reload at EXACTLY the same time. Your musket lags by a fraction of a second. THAT would be when you think "Aw shi..." BOOM!
you can hear the firing mechanism fire, but it takes like half a second for it to fire after that. Also to clarify they didn't mean like lag as in something is wrong with the video file but the gun literally just didn't fire when he pulled the trigger for half a second.
Imagine three rows of soldiers in the traditional line of advancing soldiers with one firing, two at different stages of reloading. That would have been formiddable.
@DrupBup Most of those were recruited into specialist rifle and light infantry units, and did not constitute line or militia units which made up the bulk of Napoleonic era standing armies. Even the British, who had some of the best drilled line infantry in Europe, only allocated 28 rounds per year per soldier for practice during the heights of the Napoleonic wars. In some French regiments it was as low as nine. A good number of Russian soldiers had never discharged their muskets before Borodino. You're probably thinking of this from an American frontiersman perspective, where powder was more plentiful, not a cheap European line infantry regiment. I can go back through my uni coursework and drag up all the sources if you like :)
@DrupBup British soldiers got an allocation of 30 rounds, and they got the most out of any European army. Some French soldiers hadn't even fired their weapons before their first battles. This is a fact. Experienced riflemen were VERY hard to come by as their skills were in high demand and were recruited into rifle regiments, not line infantry regiments. All your movies about frontiersmen aside, your perspective is not accurate regarding the quality of line infantry, who largely utilised massed infantry bayonet charges instead of shooting. At Gettysburg, for a fun fact, 75% of recovered guns had multiple unfired rounds loaded into them. Training in the era was terrible. You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about, and your insecure rudeness is totally uncalled for. Source: Chandler's dictionary of the Napoleonic wars
@DrupBup "many were also experienced hunters who handled their own weapons for decades before they were enlisted " No. False. Idiot. Experienced hunters were recruited into rifle regiments, where they got more pay for their skills. Most soldiers were not hunters. Practically nobody using a Brown Bess Musket was a professional hunter before joining the military. Pay for line soldiers was shit, and only the lowest rungs of society joined as enlisted soldiers - certainly not people with a skilled profession like hunting. In my years of studying Napoleonic-era warfare, I've never come across a story of a hunter joining a European line regiment as a musketeer. This post talked about a serviceman with his Brown Bess musket. Those that were impressed or joined into the military ended up in the rifles regiments, which predominantly used the Baker Rifle. Pretending that experienced marksmen were in any way widespread in line infantry regiments of this time is factually inaccurate and a product of Hollywood History. This is a matter of historical fact, and you imposing your *unsourced assumptions* on history is fucking irritating.
@@zakpearce7826 Sorry to say this, but the other guy has a point to his argument. I am convinced to a level I am satisfied with that you are the insecure one. However, I'm also convinced that you're both idiots, because you've been arguing with each other in a manner which is quite blatantly a waste of time. You did say 'I can go back through my uni coursework and drag up all the sources if you would like'. I'd like to take you up on that. Please provide sources for your assertions. Especially if you're going to argue on the internet with complete strangers. If you have those sources, instead of offering to 'drag them up', just post the sources... If you can't be bothered to cite your sources the first time, then in my opinion it's clear to me you don't care enough about the point you're making to warrant actually making that point in the first place.
Combat during that period was BRUTAL! Essentially, walk a straight line and pray you don’t get hit before it’s time to charge with a bayonet. No Helmet. No Vest. No Cover tactics.
I still can't believe that people used old charging tactics after muskets and artillery was already invented for hundred years. Weapons evolved in decades and tactics evolved in centuries. Edit: I'm not in any way a historian, just have read some books and played historically accurate games.
As always, many factors play into tactical warfare. How good is the equipment, and how well trained are your soilders. How precise are your weapons and what is the sweet spot for a weapon ( Zweihander + heavy armour / 1hander + big shield are good examples. Many battles perfected the tactics and weapons. Implementation of any new weapon means you have to start at zero, not knowing what works or not.) musketeers need coverage, and dead man are great cover to reload.
Rifle bullets are a lot harder to muzzle load though because they're tight inside the barrel, also while a musket can just be fired and forgot, a rifle would have to be aimed properly ua-cam.com/video/Gdtz4rXV-Yg/v-deo.html
@@JBGARINGAN My favorite thing about that game was watching the opponent's morale break when Fire-by-Rank unloaded on them! It didn't take long either! 🤣😅
"But if you don't run - if you stand until you can smell the garlic, and fire volley after volley, three rounds a minute - then they slow down. They stop. And then they run away. All you've got to do is stand, and fire three rounds a minute. Now, you and I know you can fire three rounds a minute. But can you stand?" -Sean Bean
To be fair he is not loading the musket with a ball, so ramming is mostly cosmetic. However if you load a ball you better make sure it is rammed all the way down or you risk having the gun explode in your face killing you. This guy knew the gun would not blow up in his face so he did not spend much time or care with the ramming.
I'm totally digging that cartridge manpurse tho... Maybe they should've started battles with several cartridges stuck to the sides of their musket frames, or their musket straps, with a dot of candlewax? That way they wouldn't have to spend time digging around in their purses! (At least not until later in the battle.)
Totally impressed ! This is how it is supposed to be done. British infantry were supposed to be able to get off 3 shots a minute. Most of these so called " Re-enactors " are lucky to get off one. Aiming was never a serious issue as these guns were notoriously inaccurate !
I shoot a Brown Bess, first land pattern, model of 1740. A practiced musket man can hit a man size target at 80 yards every single time. Yes you do aim. You line up the tang screw head at the rear of the barrel with the bayonet lug, which WAS sometimes referred to as a sight, and aim above or at the top of the target. At 80 yards, my musket shoots 3' low, CONSISTENTLY. Rumors that muskets are worthlessly inaccurate are exaggerated. You can shoot a musket about 3 times as fast as a rifle. That's why George Washington himself said he needed more muskets, as opposed to rifles. I encourage you to obtain and shoot one. You will absolutely love it when you see how big a hole it makes!
Part of the loading process does include having to partially press in the lead ball. So yes, that will indeed add time to the reloading sequence than blank firing just powder and paper.
I'm not sure by any means, but suspect there was a projectile loaded. His last shot was a hang-fire, and he partially liwers the gun. The unexpected recoil is more than would be expected from just a paper wad. Guessing at least a small load of shot. P.s. NRA muzzle loader instructor with approx 20,000 rounds down range.
Doing great, up to the last shot. That last shot was a hang-fire. Very common with flintlocks and especially so when the flash hole is not picked between shots. He should have expected the possibility, and held his stance untill the charge ignighted. Instead, the gun was lowered, out of the shoulder pocket when the charge went off, clearly surprising the shooter. Although likely still in a safe direction, this is just a guess. Bottom line is any projectile, even if just a paper wad, was unaimed. Correct form would not have changed his time, been safer, and turned this into a good example.
@@fahey5719 That's correct in a live round. He was firing blanks. A proper round the ball with wadding is snug - not exactly tight but it does slow the load time minimally. Fired one of these several times a day for years.
@@Amadeus-ni3et umm no Republicans wouldn't and cannot make laws that prohibiit having open Carry. It's Democrat run state and Governor that made it illegal. Also Republicans banning the right to bear arms? you some kinda stupid?
@@tacticalcrusader3709 - No need. Your biased lay opinion on what is or is not constitutional is meaningless. The only opinion that matters is what the US Supreme Court has said on the matter. So until SCOTUS rules otherwise, CA's laws are presumed to be constitutional.
world's first quickscoper practicing his aim
Except he'd have more holesin him than a wheel of Swiss Cheese....
Moin
Aim? With a Brown Bess? lol
@@anamericancelt6534 well with the average silver player in CSGO might as well be as accurate as this musket
camera quality checks out
Tutorial: “Switching to your bayonet is faster than reloading.”
This guy: *bet*
Not with Sleight of Hand perk.
@@Agent1W "Oh shit they're outside" reloading
@@boxcarz Also, if the soldier had "One Man Army" he can actually change his kit in as fast as 3 seconds, giving him access to the entire 18th century arsenal. He can be a sniper, grenadier, shotgunner, or even man cannoneer(man-portable two-pounder).
"Your rebel killing skills are remarkable"
*epic soldr hand gestur1!11!*
“What makes a good soldier, Sharpe?”
“Being able fire 3 rounds in under a minute sir.”
Don't forget, in any weather!
I see, you're a man of culture, aswell!
@@janpatka3303 No
Dude, one of my favorite movies. "How'd you learn to shoot like that?" "Squirrel huntin'."
What movie?
When you get extra tea for killing more enemies:
Not in Boston tho…
Ah thenk yoo. Ahm ‘ere aww week
I'll drink to that! :ssssssssslurp!:
@@paulcollyer801 cringe
@@paulcollyer801 Plot twist, Boston Harbor could fire 4 rounds in 46 seconds.
Now I know why American revolution won: they drank coffee!!!
In order the speed up performance, he set graphics to low.
lol. Good one. But In all seriousness, as a black poweder flintlock shooter, throwing powder and a paper cartridge down the barrel vs cartridge with a lead round ball is totally different. Especially after a couple of shots. Fouling in the barrel make rates of fire go way down.
Best fkn comment
gold
🥇
No, its because the cameras in the 1700s werent as good as today
"What makes a good soldier is to fire three rounds a minute in any weather"
- Richard Sharpe
Yeah... for a rifleman. ~4/min (this guy) would have been a more standard speed for a musket iirc.
Now that's soldiering!
@cristopher wong accuracy is way more important that slinging lead fast. FGast and accurate is really effective.
@@jimmeerpohl8094 that's if you are fighting a skirmish. In line battles, rate of fire and musket volleys determine victory. But yes, skirmishers vs line formation, latter often has advantage.
Three aimed shots a minute ;)
need this guy in empire total war
omg, you lade me laugh so hard!
ikr
fucking hell i was thinking the same thing
This dude is coldstream guard level reloading!
and napoleon total war.
Slaps musket*
"This Bad boy can shoot 3 rounds in 46 seconds!"
Slaps musketeer*
@@entertoby6698 I’m calling elderly protective services
@@yeetreviews 🤦♂️
Any soldier worth his salt back then could fire between 3 and 4 rounds in a minute.. this man here had enough time for a fourth round.
Gets even funnier when you find out that old techniques of using bow, allowed to shoot an arrow every second.
This is the 18th century version of "spray and pray". Lol
17th*
+dog cat The 17th century would be the 1600's.
+Christian's Channel And the early 19th century.
pretty much what they did lmao. Line up a couple of guys and then hope the collective shots would hit something
"StOp SpAmMing"
Sleight of Hand always was overpowered as hell
Hey! I know you from somewhere...
Like if gay
Watched ur new vegas video few days ago ! Nice !
Hello there.
*laughs in commando pro*
I love how the last shot hangs just long for the guy to assume it was a dud and then nearly pops out of his hands
His form went to shit on that last shot.
That is why when done in ranks you are given commands and you don’t drop the musket tile you are told to.
@@theguru18 if some one can reload faster then most it could be a good idea to use them as light infantry instead of line infantry. Every one wasnt fighting in ranks
@@Incognito-vc9wj It's because it didn't fire when he pulled the trigger so he didn't expect it to fire.
Wheres the bayonet?
It's simply amazing that you were able to colorize this old footage. This must have been one of the earliest videos in history.
They didn't have cameras back then, not even black and white. This is a reenactment.
*recorded in 1769*
Nah, I call bullshit. If it were really recorded back then it would've been in black and white. :)
+MadEngineer Thanks Sherlock!
jovonne pacheco
*facepalm* I gotta be less subtle with my jokes.
Nah, don't worry! Your comment was gold!
Angus Gibson
Thanks, trying. :)
1700’s range supervisor:
“NO RAPID FIRE!”
Golden comment. ^^^^
"This is not rapid fire!"
@@WESAVEDTHELEFT1863 “That’s not rapid fire?”
@@72EEL "Nay, this is!"
*fires off 6 shots in 30 seconds*
This whole thread is amazing. This made my day. Maybe even my whole week.
Hang-fire almost got him, at the end.
Yep, he overfilled the pan there, it would seem. I noticed he wasn't blowing the pan clean before every time he'd prime either, odds are too much powder piled up eventually.
I think he spit a tooth at the end.....
RidgeRunner577 nah that was probably a piece of paper from the cartridge
@@tortuga4874, easy there ASShpee....., do you not see a joke when it is coming through the cross hairs at you and, you only have time to half blink... BANG!!
Damn, ok you don’t have to be so rude about it. I was just trying to be reassuring :(
That third round fired a hair late, took even this rapid reload mad lad by surprise!
Not uncommon with flintlocks usually the result of to much powder in the pan or improper granulation for the pan.
@@redneckwithajeep5001 I didn't think about that, guess they shouldn't go "rapid fire" after all.
That my friend, is a Hangfire. Touchole partially clogged or a slow burning spark. If you take it off your shoulder too fast that is the result you get.
Old guy at shooting range:
NO RAPID FIRE!
Obey the rules friend
@@observantmagic4156 so you think everyone should just follow orders and Obey rules and not question anything
I'm not going to touch the low-hanging fruit that most people mention when regarding following orders rules blindly
Cover if you do not see how the indoctrinated mentality of follow the rules buddy is in our society for the express reason of control over the actions and thought of people then you are as blind as a Clydesdale
Know what your right follow the rules buddy right so any person that gets caught speeding 20 kilometres over even if they didn't hurt anyone any person under 21 that got caught with one beer or any person that just gets caught breaking any arbitrary law
Deserves to be punished to the full extent of that law of course right because every single law is just and none of them are wrong that's the society we live in
Now I don't think that you are stupid enough to think that however I do think that you are a little bit of a bootlicker and you have that all we need to follow rules mentality ingrained into you somewhere
Now I assume you have the same opinions on the Comal right everyone should be forced to wear masks there's nothing wrong with being forced right if it's for the greater good
If you ever break Gathering guidelines of totally Jasper police officers to force their way into your home
Business owners honestly should be ticketed and arrested for staying open they're just silly responsible
Baby now you're starting to understand why we shouldn't comply blindly with anything the government or an authority figure says look up the Milgram experiment
Law has never made man a whit more just but due to his respect for it even the well-disposed our daily made agents of Injustice
Henry David Thoreau
From Emma goldmans essay anarchism what it really stands for 1913
@@lurk7967 bruh. It’s a shooting range. Your life and others depends on the safety rules. Be responsible.
@@lurk7967 god damn calm down wtf
@@observantmagic4156 Yeah...Cuz shooting just down range is "hurtful"
"Cover me, I am reloading!"
resistancerat
Friendly: damn it! We're also reloading!
Enemy: same here, take your time!
Fix bayonets
And that's why they had volley fire.
"My companion in war, i desire that you cover me as i take the time to reload this fine craftsmanship of gunsmithing."
Now that's soldiering.
Kunnen wij nog wat van leren.
He would be on sharps front line
Ayyy
Well hello there!
😯👀
this may look easy, but remember this is done outside of combat, just imagine trying to fire three shots under 1 minute, when you are standing in the open and lines of enemies are shooting back along with cannon balls hitting around you, and then suddenly you hear trumpet sounds and comes a mass cavalry charge.
Yeah well, then you have 200 more musketeers by your side, everyone reloading. 10-20 seconds later, when the cavalry is 50-70 meters away, you hear your own commander shouting "TAKE AIM! FIREEE!!" And you and all the other musketeers shoot and kill 90% of the cavalry in one devastating mass fire blast ^^ Imagine that! And then about 50 amored foot soldiers with spears comes from behind to topple and kill the rest of the cavalry.
@@123TauruZ321 I got some bad news for you, man. That foot soldier with a spear? That's you. FIX BAYONETS!
@@123TauruZ321 this is why you use cavalry to outflank and charge the rear. only box formation can save these lads at which point they become immobile.
@@ericsmith5919 So what? No problem that! You got 199 others to help and the cavalry is now reduced and demoralized.
@@ImperialDiecast Box formation it is then. It doesn't really matter how the cavalry charge. Just adapt to their strategy.
But in all seriousness, i think the cavalry would have better strategy charging in bulk, right in the middle, because if the musketeers start having to crossfire on themselves, that's a big disadvantage.
Redcoat: "We need reinforcements!"
Forty Second Fred: "Stay calm, gentlemen. I got this"
forty second fred the legend
@Peyton DeMaria Because he makes them climax in 40
@Jonah Stafford 40 second Fred took my girlfriends :(
Funny, i had a similar nickname in highschool
"you guys just tank them while I do the main damage"
Imagine practicing all your life to fire a musket this fast then some guy named Samuel invents a gun that makes your skill obsolete.
Brrrrrrrrrrrrt
They already had repeating weapons then.
Samuel Pauly or Samuel Colt?
@@silverletter4551 no, they didn't thats a short land parent musket from around the 1760's to 1770's repeating wepons were limited to lorenzonis which even then weren't really that repeating
@@msmlolmanpolybrige0335 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalthoff_repeater
Can you imagine standing there and doing that while the opposing line is shooting back?
Interestingly, I bet these guys would be more effective today in a shootout than gang members with modern day guns.
+jjohnston94 that generally didn't happen a lot in history, if you think about it it makes perfect sense, coordinating 80 men in two ranks to firing together would be impossible under fire past say, the second volley. People generally don't like to die, so they routed pretty quickly once they say dozens of men diying.
+tbone martinez Usually one side or another would bayonet charge after two or three volleys of the other didn't break. Apparently the reason the American civil war's early battles were so bloody was because they didn't charge, just repeatedly shot vollies.
There were other commands that could be given other than a general company or squad-level volley fire that would provide coordinated fire from a two-rank formation of trained soldiers, such as fire by rank (front rank either standing or kneeling), fire by file (from the left or right as directed), or if the din of battle got too much for continued shouted commands, the ever popular "fire at will".
@Mr. Somebody Muskets were indeed very inaccurate beyond 100 yards,with an extreme range of 300 yards for the Brown Bess,that's the reason why all battles using line tactics(basically from Maurice of Nassau's time to Napoleons's III 1870's army)were fought at a range of 50 to 100 yards,you can hardly miss hundreds and hundreds of massed infantry in front of you firing 1-3 volleys from a .75 cal weapon. Even without a clear LOS,you need to maintain firepower and discipline to stay in line,and that's what precisely distinguished Marlborough and Frederick II of Prussia armies. Don't know what sources tbone martinez used,but there's plenty of primary historical documents concerning battle accounts from the 16th to 18th century in Europe that tell otherwise.
Modern estimates according to Cumpston, Mike. "The Guns of Empire: 18th Century Martial Muskets" Guns Magazine, August 2008, p. 60. FMG Publications, San Diego, CA put the accuracy at 75% at 175 yards.Yes,yards.
That last reload was so fast, even the musket needed a moment to realize it.
I didn't know they had cameras this good back then
But cameras didn’t exist back then?
@@yung_drakoo3605 then howd they record this.
@@Tiennamansquareisntreal illuminati i guess
It existed I think, it was black and white and bad quality but you can change that with a.i
Or idk they are just cosplaying this today and making a championship to see who can shoot faster
1700s
Enemy: "Its not full auto?!!"
Red coat: "This is!"
Dayum dude! Okay!
Damn bro O.K.
Thoust seem impressive bro indeed
More like full manual
😂😂😂 love the reference
if this guy had a time machine we would still be drinking tea
Joshua Fujiwara this is absolute gold
Fujiwara San. Do you mean to say that you have forsaken the national drink of your ancestors and all of the tradition behind it?
@@georgesakellaropoulos8162 that's America for you
No. England would be drinking coffee because this guy wasn't even ramming a projectile down the muzzle. You would have seen a 51 star American flag draped at The Who and Def Leppard concerts.
@@micahj9828 read the video description.
1700's
Enemy: "It's not full auto?"
Red coat: "No this is"
Enemy: "Damn bro"
He better be careful they’re gonna classify this as an assault musket.
Ha!
🤣🤣🤣
Fully semi automatic musket
Once upon a time maybe..
@@roskcity fully semi automatic bolt action musket.
nice
+Military History Visualized Oh, what a coincidence I found you here!
Do you think we'll ever get a episode about the Napoleonic wars? Or the times of the muskets overall?
+Wotan cz well, I was here because I was working on a script for that era ;) so I guess the answer is yes :)
Military History Visualized Amazing! Looking forward to it! Keep up the great content!
One of your patrons here, saying hi MHV.
@@MilitaryHistoryVisualized Really enjoy your channel. As an American, it's fascinating to get your perspective on history and military studies. Thanks for all the great content!
Sleight of Hand Pro.
Ratio Tile hello there
GENERAL KENOBI
So sad nobody commented this earlier
Obi wan kenobi...
The high ground
It's a good perk
Sometimes I just want to travel back in time to the 1700s and just ditch a M16 somewhere and see what happens
They copy everything except the method of operation and in the modern day we have muskets with plastic furniture foregrips and rails for optics
Well no one would have the bullets to fire it
@@arthurmorgan7645 you’re fun aren’t you
@@nigelthornberry7936 well its the truth
@@arthurmorgan7645 i wanna go back in time to the 1700s, train a squad of 50 men to use m16s, id give them 100k rounds and teach them about modern firearm technology. Simply knowing somthing is possible makes it easier to achive and with the knowlege behind how the firearms and ammunition work, who knows what technological advancements may come. Keep in mind, this is assuming i have a time machine and the money to supply the above mentioned supplies.
When 1776 rifle videos have higher quality than ufo sightings in 2021
Maybe, because the 1776 dosn't exist!
@@nosferatu6004 r/whoosh
@Aaasaaa Sosss @Caelesti Gladii oh my God, so you belive in ufo, and r not able to catch simple irony? What r u, Americans!?!
And they weren't filmed by some pea brained nerd in vertical mode!
@@nosferatu6004 an American*
Imagine you’re 18 and joining the continental army to help your nation when this 60 y/o mad lad sends 3 shoots from a fricking musket in 46 seconds
I'd report him for hacking
Why do you think he is a 60 year old? (I know it doesn't have anything to do with your whole comment)
@@longwoolcoat2266 lmao
@@erikin9757 stfu
@@t-k4560 dont be rude
He's almost as good as the sailor who "can cook minute rice in 58 seconds"
Nah i think rice dude changed his time in settings so it cooks faster
Wait, that’s illegal
Bro he obviously just turned his cooker to 650°. There is absolutely no way you'd be able to do such a thing without stupidly high temperatures
56 seconds
Key word, almost
Imagine being in the middle of a battle to see who reloads first and knowing that the loser will die. Creepy
Omg 😭, underrated
They didn't stand apart from each other and fire back towards one another one by one, they fought in formations. Colonial era armies used rotations whereupon firing the first volley, the ones who shot would move to the back of the line and the ones behind would rush forward and shoot their round. This repeated until either some tactical advantage was secured, the enemy line was severely crushed, or they ran out of ammo, and then they commenced a bayonet charge.
Plenty of time to take couver or dodge.
@@fahey5719 20 sec betvien shots.Avrage joe could run away out of efective shootin range.
nope only if they were over 50 yards away.
Watch in 144p for the ultimate 1700s experience
144p? My old Nintendo looks better than this... it’s like 55p at 17 FPS
@@jd.3493 You'll be surprize how good a nes is running, 256 horizontal for 240 Vertical, at 50hz (for PAL)
@@Rustikreignlol
Dying is an upgrade compared to living in 2021, everything and everyone fucking sucks.
@@30AndHatingIt i can agree with the last part.. but it ain’t that bad, it could be worse it’s already better than last year in my opinion. Could be because some messed up things happened to me last year. But we’ll get through 2021 mate! Hang in there
Expect: 3 shoot 46second
Reality: Go to battle died by stupid artillery
Either heavy cavalry 🤣
Or by a thermonuclear bomb
artillery? you mean canon balls? in the revolutionary war they didn't have canons with them a lot of the time. it was a lot of ambushes
That’s blood and iron for ya
How could you not see the ball coming your way?
This man is bordering 4 rounds per minute
He's too powerful to be left alive
It's not the Yankee way!
@@brosephbroman7564 Anakin, take a seat.
@@u.v.s.5583 I need him!
california would like a word with him
The prussian can do 6 rounds a minute
Three shots to the minute, Mr Sharpe!
"Hey! no full auto in the building!"
"That's not full auto, this is!"
Edit: Humor is subjective, believe it or not.
Gotta be one of these jokes under every firearms video right? It's not even funny anymore (assuming it was in the first place).
awww ... i lol'd .
Anyway , keep up your spirits mate , more will laugh eventually , just give it some time .
@@orsonincharge4879 It's not funny if you've seen it 100 times before, with absolutely nothing changed. It's not original, and it's stale.
@@landonray9517 " its so last year "
No full auto in the building will always be a meme , consider it an age test .... dont think its funny anymore ? That means you're too old .
Lando Cal "Ray"sian ?
This deals getting worse all the time !
@@orsonincharge4879 It's a meme, but not all memes are funny. Especially when they're overused as much as this one. I just get sick of going onto firearms videos and seeing kids like him try to be "witty" and "funny" by throwing in the same overused meme.
Finally a historically accurate video. Soldiers were expected to load a musket in under 16 seconds.
Three shots without bullets..
@@Movetheproduct read the description
@@Movetheproduct it's called a paper cartridge you imbecile
Finally! Someone who has actually practiced! I've been trying to find how fast trained musketmen would be able to fire for ages but all I keep finding is people taking eight minutes to load the first shot. Thank you 2007
I presume this was a competition and this would be against the rules, but if rate of fire was really important, I'd think you'd just hold the ramrod between rounds, saving the time of insertion and removal. Probably save 3-5 seconds per round so he could easily do 4 rounds per minute.
With my 45 cal black powder plainsman I can do three in a minute and a half while seated in the back of a suburban and hit everything I aim at.
My best friend chuckled every time his buddy was surprised who was in the front seat with a semi automatic rifle who didn’t get a shot off because I was taking them.
Snooze you lose.
I've read 3 was bad for trained troops. 4 was common. 5.5 - 6 was about the max.
The prussian army ,after the naoleonic wars i believe, started training the soldiers 6 shots a minute.
It was impossible to hit 6 consistently but the point was to get the soldiers to shoot one more time than the enemy in the same time span.
@@ryandavis7593 I had to Google the rifle. Very cool.
Now imagine what it would have been like to have three rows of men that could load and fire this fast, staggering the shots row-to-row so that they have a near continuous rate of fire. It'd be something incredible to behold--or terrifying, depending on where you're standing.
It turns out that two rows of soldiers are sufficient (the famous thin red line). One aimed 50-80 yard shot every 10 seconds from the file of two men in each two-yard frontage is the practical maximum due to the time it takes for the clouds of powder smoke to thin when there's little or no breeze. When smokeless powder and percussion caps were invented, the rate of fire could go up once more although by then rifled muskets were also more common. The rifling meant that aimed shots could be taken at up to 200 yards, which imposed a new limit on the practical rate of fire.
Of course if your enemy is approaching en masse, like in a Napoleonic column, then at 50 yards you don't need to spend any time aiming and can just fire into the smoke.
@@RichWoods23 smokeless powder isn't used with percussion caps homes. cap and ball still used blackpowder. minie balls also had a 500 yard range in the Civil War. i doubt you could put a cap on faster than this bloke was priming his pan either.
I’d be standing behind a tree so I didn’t get shot. Never could understand their tactics…standing out in the open to be gunned down. Was that “honorable”?
@@edadan Oh, there's plenty of reasons for why blackpowder tactics wen the way they did. These days, it seems silly to be standing in the open while you get shot, but we have the advantage of modern weaponry and technology. Consider that the musket was an inaccurate weapon, which, while still deadly if it hits, is ineffective in small numbers. If a regiment of 100 men were all diving for cover, their shots would be spread thin. Cram those 100 men into a column, however, and you can have a concentrated volley of fire that's much more likely to do something to the enemy.
As well, a column of men is much easier to command than a bunch of loosely dispersed men. They can follow simple instructions and movements in tandem with one another, while dispersed men would have to be rounded up and told what to do. Keeping in mind this is while the battlefield is covered in defining fire from both muskets and cannon. (As an aside, this is why drummers were so important--their drums communicated orders to the regiment, and were loud enough to be heard over the din. Besides, if you miss it, you can just follow the guys next to you.)
Lastly, it's an unfortunately common misconception that people back in the day were either too stupid or too caught up in honor to fight battles smartly. In reality, people back then were just as smart as people today--they just had access to less information than we do now. The reality is that they put a lot of thought into the ways they fought wars, and were generally pretty good at what they did. Sure, their tactics would eventually stop working as the nature of war evolved, but that's always been the case. Someday, people will probably look back at us and call us ridiculous for how we fight wars.
Once the infantry formation was broken they could be run down by cavalry. Hiding behind a tree may avoid being shot, but the enemy isn't going to try to shoot you.
just imagine 20,000 other dudes in a huge field doing the same thing
mad minute 1776 style
why do we have to imagine it someone should make that edit
That's called Frederick's Prussian Army :D
shooting right over the heads of everyone else.
The crazy thing though is that so few people died.
Imagine an entire line of soldiers who could reload that quickly getting 3 shots out before their enemy can reload once
I feel like the game doesn't allow that.
3 is not bad, but prussian soldiers where expected to fire 6 shots in a minute.
@@Lappmogel that’s got to be bollocks. Time simply won’t allow for 6 rounds to be primed, rammed and fired from a musket in 60 seconds.
@@EvgeneXI look it up, they har a pretty substancial army and where known for their discipline and drill. I guess they started with it loaded and started the timer with the first shot
@@Lappmogel
So I had a look. Kind of what I expected, although I’m surprised it’s even manageable at all even if it’s only during drill.
TL;DR:
. During drill armies could manage 4-5 rpm, Prussian managed 6.
. During battle few armies managed more than 2 - 3 rpm.
“By 1750, most European armies were fascinated with the speed of fire demonstrated by the Prussian troops in the War of Austrian Succession. Austrian military veterans and theorists saw that their troops could fire 4-5 rounds a minute on the drill square, basically matching the Prussian drill square ideal.[3] Prussian troops were capable of firing six rounds a minute, but could not maintain that pace for any length of time. Lossow comments, "Altogether, it would be too much to expect troops to maintain six rounds a minute for an extended time."
It seems that troops in combat fired more slowly. Two rounds a minute is a very believable figure for well-trained, veteran troops in combat. Austrian army officer Jakob Cogniazzo gives us a window into this idea:
Now, how many rounds of rapid fire do you think he can loose off in a minute when he is in a minute when he is in this condition? At least five a minute? That is certainly the norm for fire on the drill square, which conjures up visions of enemy corpses by the thousand. But, when we consider all the encumbering burden of the soldier... taking everything into due account, it would be optimistic to suppose that he fires as many as one or at the most two rounds a minute [in combat].”
We all just got this recommended 14 years later didn't we
we did
The Algorithm be having one of those weird internet days.
I did.
Maybe the universe wants me to shoot something 3 times in 46 seconds, but what? Now I'll just wait for another recommendation 😐
@@user-vr5sc7zj1s Now, now. We are still locked up tight where we are, can't even go to parks or play golf, don't go giving me ideas. 46 seconds and everyone's problems would be over.
This videos is:
✔ Life changing ✔ Informative
✔ Inspiring ✔ Heartwarming
✔ Useful ✔calming ✔Enjoyable
✔ Other
0:48 And that's why you always keep a firearm pointed in a safe direction, even after pulling the trigger.
I didnt even notice that, wow.
What happened?
@@Ramzi1944 he pulled the trigger but due to being a less reliable gun than caplocks it had a delayed fire, and shot when he wasn't aiming.
I was searching for comment where someone noticed that.
Yes but any modern firearm is not going to have a gunpowder delay.
2021: "Why do you need thirty round magazines?"
1776: "Woi yu be needing ta foire tree shots in under the King's minute fo?"
"So I can beat those rowdy blighters and be home in time for tea"
Price: “Switching to your sword is always faster than reloading.”
_Someone:_ Fucking arrow spammers.
Trained Infantry soldiers in the 18th century could fire 4 to 5 round per minute, they just had to have a top and bottom tooth. Pennsylvania rifles used by the Americans were far more accurate(up to 300 or so yards) than a smooth bore musket but took longer to load, both muskets and rifles had their advantages and disadvantages
Woah was this real footage from the revolutionary war?
yup. thats why the resolution is so low.
Oh god..........................
LMFAO!
Aidan McWhirter it's colourized
Aidan McWhirter remastered in digital HD. Now available on iTunes.
0:48 fucking lag
I know, hence "flinch" lock :D
+Edward Treu No, imagine you and your opponent are the last ones standing. Both of you realize you're "empty" and reload at EXACTLY the same time. Your musket lags by a fraction of a second. THAT would be when you think "Aw shi..." BOOM!
+Skorzy Doesn't matter if it's 1816 or 2016, it's always screwing something up.
I hate it when guns do that xD
you can hear the firing mechanism fire, but it takes like half a second for it to fire after that. Also to clarify they didn't mean like lag as in something is wrong with the video file but the gun literally just didn't fire when he pulled the trigger for half a second.
Imagine three rows of soldiers in the traditional line of advancing soldiers with one firing, two at different stages of reloading. That would have been formiddable.
would be hard to keep your heads in that situation
@@dont-want-no-wrench literally
All while under fire, explosions all around, buddies dropping right and left, possibly wounded themselves. Respect
Imagine being part of a war back then like that, and being one of the survivors at the end. That must be some experience.
“What’s the fire rate with this character then?”
“Uhh, 3.91 RPM”
Too OP. Needs to get nerfed.
But he wears a siiiick red outfit.
The video quality is from 1776 too.
Scott Krafft this comment is gold mon ami
they had video in 1776??
Andy Man yes
Andy Man obviously😅
Andy Man r\woooooooosssshhh
„There’s no reason anyone needs to be able to fire 6 rounds a Minute!“ - Royal British Army Captain stationed in the American Colonies, 1774.
Democrats, modern day redcoats.
@@christoph8365
Very true.
Magazine/clip size limits prove this.
@Funtime Florian fuck up florian
@Funtime Florian If there were less gun control that bullied 16 year old wouldn't act out since everyone's strapped.
@Funtime Florian
Probably should work on bullying first then. Would definitely be easier.
Pretty accurate video considering it was filmed in the era where this musket was still standard issue.
"Do you know what Major Sharpe says makes a good soldier?"
"The ability to fire three rounds a minute, in any weather."
Just imagine the speed from a serviceman back in the day who lived with his Brown Bess 24/7.
Slower, because they couldn't afford enough powder to fire their guns. Many were lucky if they'd fired 30 practice rounds before their first battle.
@DrupBup Most of those were recruited into specialist rifle and light infantry units, and did not constitute line or militia units which made up the bulk of Napoleonic era standing armies. Even the British, who had some of the best drilled line infantry in Europe, only allocated 28 rounds per year per soldier for practice during the heights of the Napoleonic wars. In some French regiments it was as low as nine. A good number of Russian soldiers had never discharged their muskets before Borodino. You're probably thinking of this from an American frontiersman perspective, where powder was more plentiful, not a cheap European line infantry regiment.
I can go back through my uni coursework and drag up all the sources if you like :)
@DrupBup British soldiers got an allocation of 30 rounds, and they got the most out of any European army. Some French soldiers hadn't even fired their weapons before their first battles. This is a fact. Experienced riflemen were VERY hard to come by as their skills were in high demand and were recruited into rifle regiments, not line infantry regiments. All your movies about frontiersmen aside, your perspective is not accurate regarding the quality of line infantry, who largely utilised massed infantry bayonet charges instead of shooting. At Gettysburg, for a fun fact, 75% of recovered guns had multiple unfired rounds loaded into them. Training in the era was terrible. You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about, and your insecure rudeness is totally uncalled for.
Source: Chandler's dictionary of the Napoleonic wars
@DrupBup "many were also experienced hunters who handled their own weapons for decades before they were enlisted "
No. False. Idiot. Experienced hunters were recruited into rifle regiments, where they got more pay for their skills. Most soldiers were not hunters. Practically nobody using a Brown Bess Musket was a professional hunter before joining the military. Pay for line soldiers was shit, and only the lowest rungs of society joined as enlisted soldiers - certainly not people with a skilled profession like hunting. In my years of studying Napoleonic-era warfare, I've never come across a story of a hunter joining a European line regiment as a musketeer. This post talked about a serviceman with his Brown Bess musket. Those that were impressed or joined into the military ended up in the rifles regiments, which predominantly used the Baker Rifle. Pretending that experienced marksmen were in any way widespread in line infantry regiments of this time is factually inaccurate and a product of Hollywood History. This is a matter of historical fact, and you imposing your *unsourced assumptions* on history is fucking irritating.
@@zakpearce7826 Sorry to say this, but the other guy has a point to his argument. I am convinced to a level I am satisfied with that you are the insecure one.
However, I'm also convinced that you're both idiots, because you've been arguing with each other in a manner which is quite blatantly a waste of time.
You did say 'I can go back through my uni coursework and drag up all the sources if you would like'. I'd like to take you up on that. Please provide sources for your assertions. Especially if you're going to argue on the internet with complete strangers. If you have those sources, instead of offering to 'drag them up', just post the sources... If you can't be bothered to cite your sources the first time, then in my opinion it's clear to me you don't care enough about the point you're making to warrant actually making that point in the first place.
Ah yes, the faithful machine gunner mowing down ruffians at record pace.
imagine doing this while standing in an open field and getting shot at
Combat during that period was BRUTAL!
Essentially, walk a straight line and pray you don’t get hit before it’s time to charge with a bayonet.
No Helmet. No Vest. No Cover tactics.
I still can't believe that people used old charging tactics after muskets and artillery was already invented for hundred years. Weapons evolved in decades and tactics evolved in centuries.
Edit: I'm not in any way a historian, just have read some books and played historically accurate games.
As always, many factors play into tactical warfare.
How good is the equipment, and how well trained are your soilders.
How precise are your weapons and what is the sweet spot for a weapon
( Zweihander + heavy armour / 1hander + big shield are good examples. Many battles perfected the tactics and weapons. Implementation of any new weapon means you have to start at zero, not knowing what works or not.)
musketeers need coverage, and dead man are great cover to reload.
@@BodomFox too be fair muskets were inaccurate
One reason soldiers still marched in lines and wore bright colors was because of honor, no world power wanted to be known as an uncivilized nation.
@@elite9553 Who cares about honor when your dead. (FYI: I’m perfectly aware that ALL wars are brutal)
this guy is like a machine-rifle
*machine-musket ;)
His record is now 4 shots in under a minute, no misfire 😊
It’s not even a rifle lol
@@ponraul1221 a musket is a rifle
@@MegaXhydra A musket has a smoothbore barrel without any rifling. Therefore, it’s not a rifle.
I love how he takes the musket off his shoulder before the charge caught flame and he basically hip fired it
im pretty sure that was a hang fire, you can see him pull the trigger and nothing happen
@@CynderDragoneye Definitely a hang fire. You can see him pull the trigger and hear the hammer fall just before he unshoulders it and it fires.
@@boogaloobaloo that's the nature of these weapons, they don't fire immediately
@@darth-hellhound6534 but in this case fired extremely late
Damn, even beat Sharpe's rifles standard of 3 rounds a minute.
Rifle bullets are a lot harder to muzzle load though because they're tight inside the barrel, also while a musket can just be fired and forgot, a rifle would have to be aimed properly
ua-cam.com/video/Gdtz4rXV-Yg/v-deo.html
Firing three rounds a minute in terrible quality.
Now that's soldiering
Only if my men in the Total war series were that quick...
Hahah, I was thinking exactly that! And if only they actually fired in volleys instead of randomly.
You can set them to fire volleys actually!
Its just... having to be manually done! heh.
*Laughs in Otomo clan*
You gotta research fire by rank, but hold off researching platoon fire because it ain't as effective even though it's supposed to be more advanced
@@JBGARINGAN My favorite thing about that game was watching the opponent's morale break when Fire-by-Rank unloaded on them! It didn't take long either! 🤣😅
Why doesn’t he just switch to his side arm? It’s quicker than reloading.
I guess he's not an officer.
He's not a pirate
@@masteroutlaw100 But he could be a highwayman, going after that Capt. Farrell! *"I first produced my pistol, then produced my rapier..."
@@Agent1W got to love Whiskey in the Jar. The best version that song is Thin Lizzy
Hes not in elite rank yet
*Remember that switching to your bayonet is always faster than reloading*
"But if you don't run - if you stand until you can smell the garlic, and fire volley after volley, three rounds a minute - then they slow down. They stop. And then they run away. All you've got to do is stand, and fire three rounds a minute. Now, you and I know you can fire three rounds a minute. But can you stand?"
-Sean Bean
"What makes a good soldier, sir?" "The ability to fire three rounds in under sixty seconds."
This is the first video I’ve seen where the dude doesn’t take like 15 seconds to just ram rod the thing.
To be fair he is not loading the musket with a ball, so ramming is mostly cosmetic. However if you load a ball you better make sure it is rammed all the way down or you risk having the gun explode in your face killing you. This guy knew the gun would not blow up in his face so he did not spend much time or care with the ramming.
RIP to all who said: "Once he fires, we rush him!" During the british invasion.
Am I the only british guy being recommended all these redcoat videos? Feels like youtube tryna bring us back lmao
@Funtime Florian Argentine?
The algorithm reunited us again my friend
Same topic of comment under your comment
American Uprising exists
This guy "So anyways I started Blasting"
And they lost anyway XD
That kind of attitude is what lost your people the colonies.
"Peaceful protest" In Boston
This guy- So anyways, I started blasting...
@@Justin-pe9cl they didnt lose more men though, and america lost 1812 so it goes both ways
@@WednesdayAddamsMW Britain gave away their colonies not lost. The only one they lost was america
UA-cam: let's recommend this 14 years after its uploaded
Officer:"so boys, now we gonna learn how to reload a musket"
That one dude:
The fuggin' ROTC recruits be all:
The algorithm brings us together once again, brothers
Same topic of comment above your comment
special forces material right there.
screeem Line infantry is not a special force of any kind.
Kur-Brandenburg Infanterie You don't get jokes, do you?
***** Sharpe can load and fire a 19th century rifle 10 times/minute lol
screeem Maybe in the 1770s
+Miles Wilkinson Prussians could surely train entire battalions to do 4rpm.
Sharpe: "What makes a good soldier?"
Captain Federickson:
"Yes Sir, Keeping his mouth shut when asked dumb questions by superior officers sir"
When the enemies are charging but you don't have a bayonet on your gun, and you haven't been given the order to retreat
That's when you tap load...
Tactical reload 1776.
fast hands perk in COD 1776
I'm totally digging that cartridge manpurse tho...
Maybe they should've started battles with several cartridges stuck to the sides of their musket frames, or their musket straps, with a dot of candlewax? That way they wouldn't have to spend time digging around in their purses! (At least not until later in the battle.)
Texas BEAST They weren’t just thrown in the pouches, they were individual holes for the cartridges, so it wasn’t too hard to find them😂
it’s amazing how they could have such high quality recording even such a long time ago
Totally impressed ! This is how it is supposed to be done. British infantry were supposed to be able to get off 3 shots a minute. Most of these so called " Re-enactors " are lucky to get off one. Aiming was never a serious issue as these guns were notoriously inaccurate !
I shoot a Brown Bess, first land pattern, model of 1740. A practiced musket man can hit a man size target at 80 yards every single time. Yes you do aim. You line up the tang screw head at the rear of the barrel with the bayonet lug, which WAS sometimes referred to as a sight, and aim above or at the top of the target. At 80 yards, my musket shoots 3' low, CONSISTENTLY. Rumors that muskets are worthlessly inaccurate are exaggerated. You can shoot a musket about 3 times as fast as a rifle. That's why George Washington himself said he needed more muskets, as opposed to rifles. I encourage you to obtain and shoot one. You will absolutely love it when you see how big a hole it makes!
Give him a pint of rum on the spot Mr Denny
Damm your impudence sir
4 RPM musket. 18th century rules of war: "That's illegal!"
Misses all 3 shots
Stormtroopers: you must be new around here.
Like, he might actually miss when the plot wants him to hit the target
Surprisingly good camera for 1800s 👍
“State of the art equipment soldier, fires like a canon, hurts like one too. With a whopping 3 shots a minute you’ll be dropping enemies like flies”
I was christened by a canon...
Props to the guy that went back to the revolutionary war with a camera to record this
Part of the loading process does include having to partially press in the lead ball. So yes, that will indeed add time to the reloading sequence than blank firing just powder and paper.
Yeah, right! He missed the lead bullet (obv for reasons of safety), but this would add up to the more or less 3 RPM benchmark.
I'm not sure by any means, but suspect there was a projectile loaded. His last shot was a hang-fire, and he partially liwers the gun. The unexpected recoil is more than would be expected from just a paper wad. Guessing at least a small load of shot. P.s. NRA muzzle loader instructor with approx 20,000 rounds down range.
Doing great, up to the last shot. That last shot was a hang-fire. Very common with flintlocks and especially so when the flash hole is not picked between shots. He should have expected the possibility, and held his stance untill the charge ignighted. Instead, the gun was lowered, out of the shoulder pocket when the charge went off, clearly surprising the shooter. Although likely still in a safe direction, this is just a guess. Bottom line is any projectile, even if just a paper wad, was unaimed. Correct form would not have changed his time, been safer, and turned this into a good example.
@@fahey5719 That's correct in a live round. He was firing blanks. A proper round the ball with wadding is snug - not exactly tight but it does slow the load time minimally. Fired one of these several times a day for years.
And the ball would usually, in my experience at least, be in the end he bit off and spat out.
Gotta love these _Mad Minute_ videos!
What’s makes a good soldier?
The ability to fire three rounds a minute in any weather
Now that's soldiering
God save Ireland
@@thekingshussar1808
LOUDER!!!
@@eldorados_lost_searcher GOD SAVE OIRELAN
In California this is still considered a "high powered assault weapon".
50 cal+. I walked around with replicas for my Halloween costume and the cops did nothing but stared.
In california, republicans outlawed open carry bc black people would open carry
@@Amadeus-ni3et You really want me to run through the BS unconstitutional anti second amendment garbage done by the Dumbocrats?
@@Amadeus-ni3et umm no Republicans wouldn't and cannot make laws that prohibiit having open Carry. It's Democrat run state and Governor that made it illegal. Also Republicans banning the right to bear arms? you some kinda stupid?
@@tacticalcrusader3709 - No need. Your biased lay opinion on what is or is not constitutional is meaningless. The only opinion that matters is what the US Supreme Court has said on the matter. So until SCOTUS rules otherwise, CA's laws are presumed to be constitutional.
He was getting ready to reset after that last shot before realizing it hadn’t fired yet
that hang fire was sketchy AF but still pretty impressive