Life in Herbert Marcuse's World
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 лип 2024
- New Discourses Bullets, Ep. 9
Probably the most influential Marxist thinker of the 20th century was the Critical Marxist Herbert Marcuse. His ideas were so influential that I commonly find myself saying "we live in Herbert Marcuse's world" today. Virtually everything crazy you see going on, perhaps except in schools, thanks to Woke Marxism and its corporate partners can be traced back neatly to Herbert Marcuse's neo-Marxist Theory, whether "Repressive Tolerance (newdiscourses.com/2021/01/how...," the turn to Identity Marxism (newdiscourses.com/2021/12/a-b..., or even the push for "sustainability" (newdiscourses.com/2021/10/sus...) at the highest levels of global governance (for example, the UN's Sustainable Development Goals and the World Economic Forum's Great Reset). Join James Lindsay in this insightful summary episode of New Discourses Bullets to understand what it means to live in Herbert Marcuse's world.
Support New Discourses:
www.paypal.me/newdiscourses
newdiscourses.locals.com/support
/ newdiscourses
subscribestar.com/newdiscourses
/ @newdiscourses
merch.newdiscourses.com/
Website:
newdiscourses.com
Follow:
/ newdiscourses
/ newdiscourses
/ newdiscourses
newdiscourses.locals.com/
/ newdiscourses
/ newdiscourses
minds.com/newdiscourses
/ newdiscourses
Podcast:
/ newdiscourses
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
bit.ly/NDGooglePodcasts
open.spotify.com/show/0HfzDaX...
stitcher.com/podcast/new-disc...
© 2022 New Discourses. All rights reserved.
![Rick Roderick on Marcuse - One-Dimensional Man [full length]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WNAKr1TQ0xc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Rick Roderick on Marcuse - One-Dimensional Man [full length]](/img/tr.png)
New Discourses is consistently one of the best channels on CensorTube
Yes!
Idk how he can consistently investigate and expose this stuff and God bless him for doing it. A lot of these topics make me feel ill after a while
It's da bomb yo
It's not censor it's full of right wing propaganda
@@boosie5501 🤣🤣🤣 CNN
By Occam's Razor, this video is the most important explanation for the nonsense we're suffering through today.
Share it widely.
It’s one piece of the puzzle, but you’re absolutely correct. Marcuse made-up the foundation for applying Marxist values onto race-in-America and the “plight of the black American”,
marking the beginning of massive Marxist infiltration to almost-every American institution.
The way I see it, Marcuse simply rebranded Marxism, the exact same way Critical Theorists formed their method-of-analysis. Not for Objectivity, but for “why Marxist Revolution fails”.
And can’t forget the OG “Conflict Theory”,
which claims “The Rich oppress the Poor Workers”,
and therefore The Poor are justified to Revolt”, via grandaddy Karl Marx….
It’s amazing how in-the-open it all is, when you look….No wonder they have claimed “cultural marxism is a right wing myth!” for the last 100 years…..
Also, did you know The Department of Transportation’s DBE Program enforces 10-30% of their workload be done by minority-owned aka “disadvantaged” companies?
The justification for this Neo-Marxist race-based wealth redistribution is “discrimination in the industry”.
The proof? Low-rates of minority construction workers.
That’s it! As if low-rates of minority construction workers. The automatic blame goes to discrimination, and federal jobs (money to be made) are re-distributed….
This is just one example of Neo-Marxist ideology and values being used to move MILLIONS of dollars,
and subvert American values (values like Individualism).
They look at me like cows
Thank you James, for making a shorter version so I can introduce it to people in a bite sized portion, and let them understand that they need to dive deeper, into more details that you also provide. You’re amazing.
Edited for spelling.
It's kind of terrifying that this guy had an influence in the OSS/CIA.
Yes.. remember all the infiltration of U.S. State Department in 1930-50's.
Now add in Operation Paperclip to bring in more academic tyrants into the West, of psychology and sociology and praxis of said ideas.
Thank you for those clips with critical theory summary, they are extremely helpful. I am now trying to translate your speeches and seminars for my Russian peers, but it would probably be better to start with these bullets first.
I thought about doing a translation to german. Godspeed my friend.
I took the long journey and went deep into James long long early dissertations .
@@lalaboards That's great! How are these? Where we can find em?
@@RadicalEugene go to new discourses and start with Herbert Marcuse . CRT and his pieces on the break down of Marxism going to it’s roots . I would listen twice . Then look up pieces on Hegel , objectivity subjectivity or anything I was rusty on . The long pieces really get one able to speak back what one hears In order to explain it all to another person . It takes practice and memorization but once you do it for a month ,the sh!t becomes second nature . I have been studying Marxism since 1976. I know their takeovers their tactics and part of their language. When James came along this dude went deep and I mean deep. So I actually had a Headstart but it seems like you have the will to learn so have fun . He has books on audible and paperback too .
@@RadicalEugene I think hes talking about his longer videos that span between an hour and four hours.
I feel like this type of thinking is far more ancient. These ideas are just a new coat of paint on the compulsion to correct our imperfect and flawed existence through human sacrifice. To make the world, reality, god whatever you want to call it, happy or perfect we just need a few more bodies on the pile. One either sees our existence as a miracle or a curse. These types see it as the latter.
Yes, Marcuse, et al are atavistic. They are trying to bring about a normalization of society back to a tiny elite with autocratic control over the masses. It's sort of a back to feudalism campaign. Their only real innovation is making themselves the actual gods instead of just the official and sole interpreters of the gods will/demands. As with so many power and greed obsessed people throughout history they believe that the attainment of this (dubious) goal is justification for any amount of cruelty and perversity. Communism is truly the propaganda tool of fascists. Needless to say, as soon as they can seize full control, they will dispose of all the Marxist activists (useful idiots).
Yes its called ckuster b disorders. Back then people were "evil or demons" etc. These days we say 'oh they have bpd'
Ecclesiastes 1:9 NIV
What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
True👍🏼
In fact Marcuse' ideas on tolerance are so similar to Mohammad's ideas on tolerance that one can easily get confused which one of the two you are reading/listening to.
We studied this guy at architecture school in Theory and Practice seminars, along with Foucault and the postmoderns. I never dug too deep but always thought it was odd. Now I see how we were being indoctrinated in the early 90s.
I'm 72 years old I never heard of Mark cuso But now I finally know why my 1st generation immigrant parents were Conservative Republicans My mother was the 1 that was political and she was brilliant unfortunately she died in 1965 but she tried to warn me at 15 with the were It was coming to Because Senator gold water was defeated
Research Herbert Marcuse. Your mother was correct.
Thanks, James, really appreciate the work you are putting in, I re-post your work often.
James, thank you for these smaller, bite-sized pieces of information they are perfect for when I don't have a lot of time to devote to your more lengthy discussions. Keep up the good fight and God bless.
Herbert Marcuse`s didn`t write he philosophy, he simply wrote his dystopian desires
It's all so depressing to see how completely normalised and institutionalised some of these ideas have become. I see so many regular people around me (even here in Western Europe) take on these ideas without thinking about it, just because superficially it all sounds "nice" (who doesn't want to be "tolerant" and promote "liberation" or whatever). There is almost no pushback from the mainstream (politics, media, social institutions).
@snakedogman So true what you're writing.
Now the question is, how do we get out of repressive tolerance?
Stop tolerating intolerance and tell the truth even if it causes problems.
Herbert Marcuse is very nihilistic, it is hard to identify whom he wants to thrive in his universe.
it's not hard to identify the race of people he wants to see thrive, you need to dig deeper
@Jeffery Frey :) yes
This is beautiful. Thanks for the quick video that I can share with others to get them on the road to understanding the philosophical underpinnings of all the stuff they thinks is "crazy" these days. If only it were indeed just crazy and not calculated Marxist subversion.
Excellent information… I just got introduced to your New Discourses series through the RAIR Foundation and Vlad Tepes blog - Bravo, keep it up!
I lived in "Herbie's World" at UCSD (1969-1970). We practiced his "repressive tolerance," shouting down speakers and campus events we didn't agree with. But by my junior year (1971), Herbie and his Neo-Marxism were in my rear-view mirror, as I was on my way to thinking like a right-libertarian (though I had yet to encounter libertarian or Objectivist literature).
Although I am new to this, I have been sharing every episode on my FB page. Love these, especially _this_ episode!
A couple of things occur to me, while listening to this informative content. One is the sense I get of Marcuse viewing humans as one-dimensional creatures, little different from rabbits or other herd animals in need of feed, shelter and places to breed. And, of course, herds need to be culled in order to be sustained, which brings me to the second thing that came to mind--a quote by Kim Jong Ill during the height of famine in North Korea in the 1990s: "Socialism is difficult, when there are too many people."
no worries about going over, your analysis is super insightful and brings clarity to current events.
I dig that you selected the 'lung-blower-outer' 9MM bullet for the thumbnail of these videos...
Outstanding. No apology necessary.
It's kind of hilarious that the left has abandoned the working class but still wave the hammer and the sickle flag!
The left has not abandoned the working class, the left directly advocates for policies that would expand the middle class. The right directly advocates for policies that shrink it.
This length is fine.
Good episode.
"Its hierarchy, not hypocrisy " wow, that's a snappy and insightful phrase. Where did you get that from?
Bongino?
In my self-imposed quest to study personality and human nature (started because I had a significant other that has BPD and I was attempting to understand how her mind works), I have, as you have elaborated in other videos, come to a disturbing albeit unsurprising conclusion: Marxism, in all of its iterations, or as you've been wont to define Marxism as a religion, all of its denominations, is inherently Narcissistic. I've thought a lot about it over the last few years, seeing all of the woke nonsense in the world, but in particular on social media here in the West, and this has been the conclusion I've come to: it is a narcissistic pandering to victimhood that, by it's very nature, demands that everything else conform to an idea of perfection that is beyond the scope of human capability, and shows that it (and those that follow this... religion) is woefully inept at understanding human nature, with the sole exception of its ability to manipulate language and pathos to achieve its own goals and ends.
"... with the sole exception of its ability to manipulate language and pathos to achieve its own goals and ends." And with it, the ability to call forth destructiveness on command. They are THE devil's advocate.
No, it's not nacessitic and doing a clear headed analysis of it and it's problems would serve you better.
For example, a serious problem is the censorship of right-wing thoght as necessary. You can't censor what other people speak or much less think.
Look into the defining qualities of Anti-social personality disorder
@@catsaresocute650 “yeah, nah”. That’s not an argument. It is indeed narcissistic for all the reasons he has explained. It doesn’t need to be perfect as an explanation nor does he need further research. You are doing the exact same thing as the marcusian leftist. Setting up an impossible expectation (any political discussion is always opinions, not science) and thoroughly rejecting those who fall short. You lose your humanity and wisdom in the process.
Please have more short videos like this as the 2 or 3 hour ones are difficult to make time for or keep a lean on... thanks!
Excellent video, James
Thank you for posting this
Nice bullet point, I was wondering if you could elaborate on his advocacy for pod like cities. I was wondering if that was something here for said or alluded to. Thanks
Good stuff. Eye opening.
No apology needed.
It is a great primer.
This Marcuse was one sick, twisted man.
Thank you Dr. Lindsay, I appreciate your hard work. Almost enough to ignore the fact that the thing in your graphic is a loaded cartridge or round, not a bullet. Sorry for how my brain works. :-)
James, would you please consider making brief printables that I could post on my cube wall at work or in my car dashboard (when it’s parked)? I’m glad for these videos and listen often, but many others will not listen even if I send them a link. I’m just looking for a hard copy resource to GET PEOPLE THINKING and curious about what is happening and where it’s going.
very well put, i played this for my carpool
James, would you be so kind and post a link to that paper (the politics of liberation in privilege and love in privileged classrooms). I've tried some variations added and removed the authors name, etc and it does not come up at all in my search results. No censorship to see here! Thank you.
Marcus Herbert is way too kosher for the average Gentiles..
You're describing the liberal/feminist/religious mindset or culture.
Yes, neomarxism
Good work.
What does Freud, Marcuse and Marx in common? Who dit they want to destroy?
I, once again, had to turn the notification button on for this channel. It keeps getting turned off for some reason.
The series is just great
Ignorance is strength, war is peace, freedom is slavery and *return to monke*
The general population has been slow to follow the strategic deceits of this movement to topple our culture and polity;
thanks James!
Well, this is odd. I was mysteriously unsubscribed to New Discourses. It is first on my list of subscriptions. I listen to James every single day. I don’t want to attribute it to nefarious actors. I don’t like nefarious actors.
UA-cam has been doing it for years with all the controversial channels I follow.
Very interesting. What can we do about it.?
more people needs to see this
James Lindsay is doing a tremendous service. I hope he doesn't get "yeeted" from UA-cam.
In the description text for this video, James mentions that the craziness in our world these days coming from Marcuse’s influence but except in our public schools. Is he kidding? That’s an exception? Come on James. What am I missing?
My wife teaches. She just had to attend DEI and SEL "training". What fun.
It is interesting that in 1969, Marcuse's Essay on Liberation is released, where he explains that man must be changed, biologically, to accept socialism, in such a way as to be totally dependent on government for his subsistence. And then, in 1970, George Lucas begins filming "THX-1138", illustrating one man's revolt against the exact duplicate of Marcuse's utopian society. I wonder if George had been reading that essay back then?
He said a few times, ".... That's the repressive tolerance we have today." But wouldn't it be liberating tolerance? Or is it just the left applying the repressive tolerance that Marcuse saw in US Capitalism back in the day?
Narcissistic personalities built the Tower of Babel. Whether you believe the story to be literally true or not do you have any during ancient story about the problems of collectivism. The trinity came down and had a conference and decided to spread everyone out. Because apparently, if the tower of babel had a T-shirt, it would’ve read, “together we suck“
In One-dimensional man Marcuse expresses the opposite point of what you mention in regards to sexual liberation. He writes that sexual liberation has been used as a tool of repression. ( page 80-81)
One can raise a question of whether Marcuse was the originator of the sustainability mantra or merely repeating an already present, if relatively nascent, eco-movement.
a year later and this has only become more true.
We had to read him in college ~ Loyola University Chicago in early 90s. I didn't get it.
Criminalization of self defense is the rule of law in America . Read Bastiat's "the law."
My position is simple, " when the law of the land is weak your own arm must be strong." James Fenimore Cooper.
There is also a connection with what's going on politically with post modernism
=== CONTENTS: Herbert Marcuse's works ===
3:58 1.) "Repressive Tolerance" (1965) - "Liberating Tolerance" for Left, not Right.
6:42 2.) "Essay on Liberation" (1969) - Shift to NEO-Marxism: "Working class failed us; let's shift to the ghetto populations, & students." (Begins with "We need to make a biological need for Socialism.")
8:41 3.) "Eros & Civilization" (1955) - Sparked the Free Love movement.
10:16 4.) "One-Dimensional Man" (1964) - On Sustainability. (No overpopulation, no industry.)
I'm still looking for evidence that Marcuse's books sold "hundreds of thousands of copies."
Where the heck are "left and right" ever defined? Why do we even use these terms in politics? I've always felt like there's a pretense that everyone was just born knowing what they mean and that the definition is nice and static.
huh?
As a rule of thumb just see a state or individual responsibility for existence.
The Right emphasise the individual, the Left, the state.
It kinda works but at bottom it's a vague dichotomy today.
It came from the french revolution and has no fixed meaning. It is literally worthless to describe something left or right
Yeah I prefer individualism vs collectivism. "Left" and "Right" makes it easier to hide behind and shirk off responsibility for the crimes of the collective movement(s).
if ya can't stand
ya can't fight.
Normally these videos are great, but there is a factual error and a gross misrepresentation in this one (which has come up a couple of times). The idea of circular economy comes from biology, and sustainability comes from ecology. The fact is, we live on a finite planet and life is vulnerable to environmental change. Marxists like Marcuse imported concepts like these, which are scientific, because they lend a sense of epistemological power. Marxism is weak and inspired by narcissistic traits while science is empirical and rational. We need to separate the Marxian delusions from the science, not reject the science. It is wrong to credit Marcuse with coming up with these notions, and even worse to reject scientific insights because Marxists import them. That would be like rejecting contemporary medicine because the Nazis did the experiments behind it, instead of stripping off the Nazi ideology and using the valid science to save lives.
I understand where you come from but I disagree. These "scientific" concepts you talk about were inspired and created by Marxist thinking and not the other way around. The idea of finite resources (coal in particular) was peddled by Marxists since the 1800s, same with the idea of human being parasites of this world, the idea of food won't be enough to feed so many people, depopulation, etc etc, they all have the same source and it's not rigorous science (all of those are demonstrably false) but simply ideology. A Marxist way to view the world and the place humans occupy in this world. It's the oppressor/oppressed paradigm applied to ecology if you will.
@@radadadadee The observation that we live on a finite planet, with finite resources, vastly predates the 1800s. References to it are found in ancient Greek and Indian texts, for example. It is foolish to believe that we can go forward indefinitely using the extractivist model. The field of Ecology is multidisciplinary, which included physics and biology as well as ideas from the humanities. The Marxian methods and theory make the systems fallacy, which is why the oppression paradigm is pseudoscience, and the ecological fallacy, which is why it grossly distorts the social dimensions. It would be wiser to strip the Marxism out of the field while retaining the science, rather than denying the limitations of the planet.
@@AndrewNuttallWearsPants "It is foolish to believe that we can go forward indefinitely using the extractivist model"
let's just say we disagree and I'll leave it like that
Must you prove the planet is finite in it's resources, or should we just believe this claim? You have no idea where this planet came from, so how can you claim to know where it's going, or how much finite resources it has. There are no Facts here, just speculation.
'Trust the Science' is a propaganda slogan while Science is a religion because its devotees put faith over actual proof. Belief in Vaccines is an example of their Faith over Fact.
How is Marcuse different from the Nazis?
He is not, that's what Marxists are desperate to hide.
During the early to mid 1970s San Francisco, Angela Davis (along with Harvey Milk and Mayor George Moscone many other big leftist names) community organized with Jim Jones and often spoke about social justice at his Peoples Temple.
Now Harvey Milk...he _REALLY_ cared about the children.😂
10:05. 100% agree
Can "making sense" be achieved by one man in one lifetime alone? Does it have to be a collective effort? Or is it rather good to delegate a good portion of it to "trusted sources"? In the latter case we have such a source in James Lindsay. He reads all that exo-left stuff, so we don't have to.
Or am I being lazy?
Nothing more to say, just commenting for the hell of it.
what is Marcuse's faith?
Athiest as all Marxists are
Jewish like all church fathers of the left.
Re Over Population: I recommend C S Lewis's That Hideous Strength. Particularly Dr Filostrato.
❤
5:08 "... self defense is always bad...."
Lots of writers imagine this sustainable economy with free love. Aldous Huxley, for one, in his final 1962 'Utopian' novel 'Island'. Huxley wasn't Marxist; he wrote against Marxism. Island was also influential on the left.
Which is ironic as both Huxley and Rand concieved Marxism as unobtainable then fell into the same trap of ignoring human irrationality.
@@w0keking430Huxley didn't just see Marxism as unobtainable but as bad too. He was big on human irrationality. For example, in his dystopian, post nuclear war: "Ape and Essence". I think Island was a kind of reconciliation for posterity - so that he wouldn't only be remembered for his dystopian gloom. Island is atypical, and written at the end of his life. Aspects of Island were definitely influenced by by Huxley's conversion to the Psychedelic religion. So lots of things about Island are exceptional from the Huxley genre.
You must realize that Marcuse, just like the rest of the members of the Frankford school, all came from that ethnic group that you can’t criticize, but that still controls everything through the major institutions. The United States took this group of guys in to rescue them from the Nazis and look how they thanked us. Antonio Gramsci doesn’t fit in that way, but he sure did ideologically.
Notice above, that I didn’t mention that they were part of a religious group because, given that they were all atheists, it doesn’t really apply, although it is quite common for that ethnic group. Saul Alinsky was certainly a kindred spirit of them as well as one of Barack Obama’s mentors.
I think he said we live in HM world about 5 times
The Frankfurt School is a major argument against immigration. I can't stand marcoosa's stupid world.
I have shared this channel with a few friends and family that I have that would even watch it.. Unfortunately My 3 beautiful daughters And their husbands and children are Democrats And there is no Talking to them
Wow.. watching CensorTube move my comments and replies around. Need James on NewTech too.
I was banned from Facebook because of this viewpoint
Absolutely disturbing!!!
Did Marcuse read Brave New World and thought, yes a hypersexualized, stratified autocracy is actually way?
Thanks thx thx James! He sounds like Satan! Has a similar schematic!
They are all follower's of the Left Hand Path, ie satanism
Marcuse is actually slightly wiser than Satan. Marcuse didn't believe in God, so just ignores Him. Wrong, but wait.....
Satan, not only knows God exists but believed he could defeat Him...... now *that's* the height of stupidity.
This was well worth my second listen. By living space do you think Marcuse was referring to the Nazi's taking the Sudeten? land as room to live??
This was a great synopsis to f Marcosa.
I'm spreading the message I send this out on social media, friends and family. We need a greater awaking.
Marcuse and His Crazy World🥸.
2:18
Marcuse - Jewish. Marx - Jewish.
Seems like we are living in this Jewish conceived horror show.
First
5:30 “there are no Neo-Marxist riots”…..
/s
What's bad about the circular economy? We need it. Are you for the consumerism, throwaway, cheap Chinese junk society that we live in today? You like being dependent on landfills everywhere to throw away all our cheap Chinese junk in?
Its important to stress that Marcuse was a neo-Marxist, he had important critiques of Marxism!
Is it really important though?
important like the difference between Hitler and Mousillini or Stalin and Mao?
True, but that's just the dialectic progressing. Marxism is a self-radicalising religion.
whatever
Same as Hitler
Urban Pod Cities.... hmmm... like socialism of Indian reservations of USA? (agenda 2030)
You apologize for transgressing beyond 14 minutes? ...like REALLY?? 8)
So basically Marcuse was an a**hole who thought he could tell others what to do.
You’re American, pronounce words American, ya scholar.
I think Dr. Lindsay may sometimes slip into parallelomania when comparing present day phenomena with historical writings such as Marcuse. The world is a very different place from when he wrote 'One-Dimensional Man', and although he and Schwab may use common phraseology, they are, by and large, talking about different things. They are certainly far apart in how to deal with the problems they identify. If we could dig up Marcuse and ask him what he thinks of 'stakeholder capitalism', I don't think he would like it.
All of these marxists are socially interconnected. They intentionally use the cloward-piven strategy to destabilize societies, in order to blame the opposition of doing so.
Power is all that matters to these people. These people have no principles. These people have no values. These people believe in nothing but power and control. As Vaush put it, "fuck your principles and your values. I believe in winning. If I think it'll help me win, I'll do it."
Even though they use eachother's sociological warfare strategies to gain control, there will always be different end goals and in-fighting amongst them.
People like Schwab take Marcuse and followed his roadmap. The world is certainly different, but it's because we have followed the roadmap into Marcuse's world.
@@radadadadee So would Marcuse approve of 'stakeholder capitalism'? You might want to think a bit about that one.
James understands this. Check out his Sustainability - Tyranny of the 21st century podcast, where if memory serves he says that Marcuse would be unhappy because he'd feel his movement was co-opted or perverted. But that's how it always goes as one generation of left-wing nutjobs goes and a new one comes in. Schwab has certainly read Marcuse and used his roadmap to a fair degree.
@@juvenalsdad4175 just stop
You have gone full conspiracy nut, haven't you? Marcuse has a wacko version of sustainability, ergo he is the "root" of the whole project? Go out and get some air.
Its evidently the basis for the push in the current political climate otherwise why would eco-fascism be a thing?
Why do we ignore the ethnicity of many of these types of thinkers?