More than 4,700 New Premium Cars Wiped Out: The Worst Car Carrier Ship Disaster Costs Billions $

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 128

  • @robertclifton2211
    @robertclifton2211 Рік тому +19

    It’s no wonder why the price of cars and insurance is so expensive. They’re passing the costs of losses on to consumers instead of having financial damages incurred by the shipping companies!

    • @lucianene7741
      @lucianene7741 6 місяців тому

      It's better that way. Consumers can buy smaller cars, companies cannot operate at a loss.

    • @RealityCheck6969
      @RealityCheck6969 6 місяців тому +1

      Did you hear about competition? Or a free market? If WV wants to sell their cars at a higher price you have all the right not to buy it and buy a cheaper one from their competitors. So your argument is flawed.

  • @saintpreferred9223
    @saintpreferred9223 10 місяців тому +9

    Notice how the cause of battery fires are never mentioned.

  • @codygocam
    @codygocam Рік тому +12

    I know what happened! Those Porsche Taycans with those crappy pouch, lithium, batteries caught fire!

  • @hugodiazgarcia1266
    @hugodiazgarcia1266 10 місяців тому +3

    Congratulations on your excellent video about the worst car carrier ship disasters around the world causing loses in millions of dollars !!!

  • @lenny108
    @lenny108 Рік тому +10

    The problem was when the first car started to burn they couldn't do anything. The crew only could watch how one by one more and more cars started to burn. Until hundreds of cars were burning and still there was no way to stop the fire. The shipping company actually completely ignored this scenario of what to do if a fire breaks out. But isn't that as stupid as being a criminal?

    • @User_Brandon
      @User_Brandon Рік тому +1

      One term that may be appropriate for this scenario is "criminal negligence".

    • @stum8374
      @stum8374 Рік тому

      RISK ASSESSMENT ANYONE the ultimate responsibility lies with the pilot NOT his bosses.

  • @damianousley8833
    @damianousley8833 Рік тому +7

    The only way to transport EVs safely is to have the batteries totally discharged or flat before loading and shipping. The cars are igniting when the batteries are charged, and the energy stored in the batteries helps the conflagration start and progress rapidly until the chemicals in the Li ion batteries ignite causing high temperature combustion. Underground mining equipment have batteries that can be flooded with brine to discharge the batteries with the brine also providing a medium to absorb heat.

  • @jimrichards3916
    @jimrichards3916 Рік тому +13

    So lloyds of London will not insure anymore car carriers? Would you?!!!!

  • @Kampala69
    @Kampala69 Рік тому +5

    Hmmm, sooner or later the insurers will be unwilling to cover the risks involved in car transporters. Getting too hot to handle!

  • @rdotmitchell
    @rdotmitchell 2 місяці тому

    I can only imagine how much it cost to dismantle ships this size.

  • @0e32
    @0e32 Рік тому +14

    This is the price of manufacturing the cars abroad and then shipping them across the globe to the buyers.

    • @yutakago1736
      @yutakago1736 Рік тому +5

      If the cars are manufacture locally. It will cost the buyer an arm, a leg and a kidney to buy. :D The problem is local people want cheap cars but don't want to accept low wages to manufacture the cars. The only solution is to use cheap labor oversea to manufacture the cars.

    • @0e32
      @0e32 Рік тому +1

      You are so right. The problem is that, among other things, we feed communism by buying cars from China.@@yutakago1736

  • @andrewmcewan4526
    @andrewmcewan4526 Рік тому +14

    Any battery powered car on the ships?

    • @sd906238
      @sd906238 Рік тому +10

      That is what started the fires and then fueled the fire to the point it could not be extinguished.

    • @Perich29
      @Perich29 6 місяців тому

      @@sd906238 the Atlantic Ocean extinguished the rest of the flames.

  • @funnyfarm5555
    @funnyfarm5555 Рік тому +10

    The Golden Ray capsized due to ballast calculation error by crewmembers.

  • @EllieMaes-Grandad
    @EllieMaes-Grandad Рік тому +7

    Felicity Ace, Cougar Ace, Baltic Ace, Sincerity Ace . . . . such unfortunate coincidences . . . !

  • @Kenny_Mars
    @Kenny_Mars Рік тому +18

    The last couple were started from electric car fires. Soon insurance companies will just refuse to insure them.

    • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
      @Shipspotting_Vietnam Рік тому +2

      Do you mean no insurance for electric car?

    • @richardkaz2336
      @richardkaz2336 Рік тому +4

      @@Shipspotting_Vietnam They will refuse to insure the shipping operators and that will include Euro car/passenger ferries and probably Le Shuttle the operators of the Euro Tunnel train that shuttles cars. I imagine Insurance companies will start to refuse mone EV's like BYD, Porsche and Mercedes.

    • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
      @Shipspotting_Vietnam Рік тому +2

      Yes, they are smart and control the game!! Even for heath insurance for us! same game, right? @@richardkaz2336

    • @Kenny_Mars
      @Kenny_Mars Рік тому

      @Shipspotting_Vietnam No insurance for shipping them, if they have any. Higher insurance for private owners.

    • @JJSmith1100
      @JJSmith1100 Рік тому +3

      It turned out the fire was not started by the electric cars, but by something else. At least if a ship with EV's sink there is not 1000's of liters of oil and fuel dumped in the ocean. It is interesting how someone would like to point out the ship with electric cars, but all those before carrying ICE cars where the cars were actually the cause of the fires is apparently OK.

  • @teebosaurusyou
    @teebosaurusyou Рік тому +2

    Sure as hell doesn't look like thick black smoke.

  • @duanvogel3684
    @duanvogel3684 Рік тому +7

    How can a tragedy be FANTASTIC???

    • @nonamenoface8828
      @nonamenoface8828 Рік тому

      It was just like we should tkink it

    • @EllieMaes-Grandad
      @EllieMaes-Grandad Рік тому +2

      . . . . because it's a fantasy - someone's weird idea, usually an untruth.

  • @mikepech6822
    @mikepech6822 Рік тому +6

    Want to sell cars in foreign countries, make them build them there. Save our oceans and make jobs. Either that or just sell domestic made cars. I still remembered when we just had Ford, General motors, Chrysler and AMC. We had lots of jobs and none of these disasters. Now with all this global crap, this is just one of the things destroying our earth and local jobs. Count up all the foreign cars here and figure how many would have been built and sold here and parts for repair. All that is jobs and our money going the foreign countries.

    • @teebosaurusyou
      @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

      This post illustrates a few disasters. How many total cars per year are successfully transported half way around the globe?

  • @carlmasnec
    @carlmasnec 9 місяців тому +3

    "EV" Cars should I say more? Fire starters.

  • @Joe1935429
    @Joe1935429 Рік тому +11

    Ships don't 'tilt', they 'list'

    • @gregjenkins2925
      @gregjenkins2925 Рік тому +1

      did you see the list - what cars were listed on that list ?

    • @Joe1935429
      @Joe1935429 Рік тому +1

      @@gregjenkins2925
      There are two different meanings of the word 'list' at work here. Check out the nautical (verb) vs. the presentation of items (noun).
      Class dismissed. 🤕😍

    • @royfearn4345
      @royfearn4345 Рік тому +2

      And it listed to starboard, not tilted to the right!

    • @gregjenkins2925
      @gregjenkins2925 Рік тому +2

      @@royfearn4345 gee I hope we don't get picky and start on use of nouns and pronouns -we will be forced to have the ship identify as a ?? submersible ?

  • @michaeldrew2998
    @michaeldrew2998 Рік тому +3

    Just thought you should know when a sea vessel list's over its not called a tilt it's LIST LISTING/LISTED

  • @northstar1950
    @northstar1950 Рік тому +9

    I don't give a toss about the cars, I'm more concerned for the environment.

    • @bobbritten5673
      @bobbritten5673 Рік тому

      Hat about all the ships sunk in the second world war ? Don't forget that are still down there !time will tell the story!

    • @StockTurboN20
      @StockTurboN20 2 місяці тому

      Cry harder

  • @ianbrock5456
    @ianbrock5456 Рік тому +3

    Seamanship issues aside, I do notice how all parties skirt around blaming EV's for the fire disasters. Sure, the incidence is rare, but it is also, once started, uncontrollable. At heart, the issue is that started by an EV or not once an EV is involved the fire is uncontrollable. This is because an EV battery is a self-sustaining conflagration. It is not a battery "fire" but a chemical reaction called thermal runaway, and that cannot be extinguished by normal procedures.

    • @scottw5315
      @scottw5315 Рік тому

      Burns at about 2000 degrees F.

  • @Perich29
    @Perich29 6 місяців тому +1

    1912 Titanic hit the iceberg and sank
    1915 the Lusitania was torpedo by the U-20
    1956 Andrea Doria had a head on colision with Stockholm and then Andrea Doria sink.
    2022 Electric car sank the Felicity Ace, what elts happened in the Atlantic sea?

  • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
    @Shipspotting_Vietnam Рік тому

    Meaningful video!

  • @tonyking9235
    @tonyking9235 Рік тому +19

    GOOD RIDDANCE TO THE ELECTRIC CARS.

    • @PeacefulMichael
      @PeacefulMichael 10 місяців тому +1

      That's what the horse and buggy folks said about gasoline cars at the beginning.

    • @tonyking9235
      @tonyking9235 10 місяців тому

      @@PeacefulMichael DO YOU HAVE AN ELECTRIC CAR.

    • @PeacefulMichael
      @PeacefulMichael 10 місяців тому

      I have no car, but I think they're what's next until something comes along that renders all today's cars obsolete. .

  • @EllieMaes-Grandad
    @EllieMaes-Grandad Рік тому +4

    Of course, if these ships were electric-propelled with eco-batteries, all would be eco-safe . . . . yeah, right!

  • @richardbarron8869
    @richardbarron8869 Рік тому +1

    YOU CANNOT USE THE TERM SAFE AND TRANSPORT TOGETHER IN A SENTENCE CONCERNING EVs!

  • @TWOCOWS1
    @TWOCOWS1 Рік тому +2

    Darn! I would ve like to have one of those cars :)

  • @geraldseely2203
    @geraldseely2203 Рік тому +3

    I’ve never head of a gasoline car catching fire

    • @MrStevecrasher
      @MrStevecrasher Рік тому +1

      They do, in service and as they age and far more commonly from the EV comparison data available but they key difference is, the fire services can put them out and they don’t have to sit in a tank of water for months to TRY and stop them reigniting.

    • @teebosaurusyou
      @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

      Bullsh*it. The local fire department - half their calls are for fuel vehicle fires.

  • @witperd1564
    @witperd1564 Рік тому

    To prevent this from happening in the future, Don't employ people who smoke . All the cars have petrol/gas in them, so the build up of fumes is present and a fire very real.

  • @310M3
    @310M3 10 місяців тому

    Personally, I clearly see the blame as the shipping company. As a customer, I commission a company to take my cars from A to B. The shipping company sends the offer “yes we can do it” As a customer, I have no influence on what safety requirements are on the ships. Then they would have had to reject the order if they did not have sufficient fire protection on their ships. Or they would have had to install a fire cell where only electric cars could come in... As I said, the blame clearly lies with the shipping company

  • @garlandstyle5797
    @garlandstyle5797 Рік тому +2

    Old Old news. Cougar ACE 2008, Baltic Ace 2012, MV Golden Ray, 2019, 2022 for the Felicity Ace

    • @teebosaurusyou
      @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

      This post illustrates a few disasters over the years. How many total cars per year are successfully transported half way around the globe?

  • @captsirl
    @captsirl Рік тому +4

    They need to outlaw these lelctric cars from ships and parking them in garages. The damn thing are dangerous. Thankfully FORD just dropped the production of them.

  • @stephensmith799
    @stephensmith799 Рік тому

    Look like hull inadequate for its high centre of gravity

  • @EllieMaes-Grandad
    @EllieMaes-Grandad Рік тому +4

    Threats to eco systems? Expect eco-loonies to campaign for an end to world-wide shipping . . . ?

  • @robdedrick2052
    @robdedrick2052 Рік тому

    My thoughts Exactly

  • @stuuuporman
    @stuuuporman Рік тому +5

    EV's, will peeps ever learn?

  • @HoverLambo
    @HoverLambo Рік тому +2

    how long until EVs have to be shipped in isolated containers or without batteries?

    • @teebosaurusyou
      @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

      Never going to happen. They have insurance.

    • @ianbrock5456
      @ianbrock5456 Рік тому

      It is possible for the EV battery to spontaneously ignite, although it is more correctly called thermal runaway. Normal firefighting procedures (starving the fire of oxygen) do not work as the battery is a self-sustaining conflagration and the fierce chemical reaction is, I believe, powerful enough to melt a container. Look at the response where an EV ignites on a street somewhere. Extinguishing the chemical reaction is not possible. Then put that car in a confined space with rubber, plastic, and perhaps other EV's crammed into a ship - or even a basement carpark.

    • @edrouse9578
      @edrouse9578 Рік тому

      Volkswagen will be building an EV battery plant in Canada in 2025.

  • @kpdvw
    @kpdvw Рік тому

    And the latest incident July/Aug 2023 with a fire on the Freemantle Highway, extinguished and presently being unloaded @ Eemshaven, Netherlands...

  • @teebosaurusyou
    @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

    Losing a Porsche 911 GT2RS? The goat herders of the world cry themselves to sleep ever night.

  • @trollhdpc3293
    @trollhdpc3293 Рік тому +3

    1 YEAR OLD NEWS! WTF

  • @psychiatry-is-eugenics
    @psychiatry-is-eugenics Рік тому +3

    Electric cars are good for the environment .
    BS

  • @philipsemmens2251
    @philipsemmens2251 Рік тому

    The estimated value of the cars doesn’t sound right to me .billion maybe ,not million

  • @davewiggins6087
    @davewiggins6087 Рік тому +1

    WHAT A SHAME...who wants them anyway...rubbish

  • @NijaziKurtovic
    @NijaziKurtovic Рік тому +1

    Never trust a computer

  • @BraYsUnc06
    @BraYsUnc06 Рік тому +2

    All pre meditated "accidents", insurance is why

  • @darrenmurphy6251
    @darrenmurphy6251 Рік тому +1

    if someone was to say these cars (that people are not buying during the recession + uncertaincy over the future of ev, petrol,diesel) are getting arsoned and other causable fates to get the insurance payout id be saying well how obvious! and we will all assume ..well ev batteries!

  • @joeoria4497
    @joeoria4497 Рік тому +3

    they also called the RNLI but the reply was sorry we are busy picking up illigal migrants off the French coast and taking them to Dover 😂

  • @Fossillarson
    @Fossillarson Рік тому +3

    wow another rolo sinks HUMM??? conspiracy ? yup sure dose make for demanding market if you remove cars especially bc ppl are not buying cars or trucks repos are HIGH

    • @JustMe-md2gp
      @JustMe-md2gp Рік тому

      I think you meant 'RORO', rollon-rolloff.

  • @danielramsey1959
    @danielramsey1959 Рік тому +2

    Ban global vehicle shipping, more so in the new EV era.

  • @EmmanuelAnokyeFosuhene
    @EmmanuelAnokyeFosuhene Рік тому

    Very amazing nothing to do about it what are their future plans

  • @teebosaurusyou
    @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

    The car companies and ship owners lose nothing.
    They have insurance for any loss. 🤪🤪🤪

  • @steventurner8428
    @steventurner8428 Рік тому

    Oh! such a loss to the world how can we ever cope. All that pollution to manufacture and potential pollution into our air, how can we ever survive without it. I suppose we may but I am not sure about the oceans. Oh! shit I forgot if they die we die. Damn we dead

  • @keithpearson7059
    @keithpearson7059 Рік тому +2

    ....caused by E.V.:s ?? 😂

  • @robdedrick2052
    @robdedrick2052 Рік тому

    No ! Zero $ .

  • @tonydavis6482
    @tonydavis6482 Рік тому +11

    its ok.....probably electric crap....no one will miss them...

    • @stargazer_100
      @stargazer_100 Рік тому

      They used to be able to starve fires by removing oxygen from the hold. Battery fires don't need oxygen. The entire ship is filled with what has been labelled as "dangerous" cargo in almost every other scenario. One goes, they all go, ship and all. It's only luck if no one dies under those circumstances. This whole battery thing is just another government(non-consenting taxpayer) funded ripoff to fill the coffers of corrupt politicians and their cronies. There is no such thing as clean battery power. They will pronounce that publicly when the money has run out for battery and they move on to something else to rape that option.

  • @ericdishington428
    @ericdishington428 Рік тому +3

    Electric cars, " Evironmentally Friendly" lies, lies, and more lies..........

  • @anandindoi5135
    @anandindoi5135 Рік тому

    😢 sad

  • @d.s.7647
    @d.s.7647 Рік тому +3

    That is called Karma.

  • @N444BYL
    @N444BYL Місяць тому

    Titanic but the cars version

  • @EllieMaes-Grandad
    @EllieMaes-Grandad Рік тому +1

    Too much coincidence . . . ?

  • @adamsyclone7409
    @adamsyclone7409 Рік тому

    They need to redesign the ships to have multiple sealed off cargo areas insted of massive car holds were the fires or floods can rip threw them in nearly no time also an emergency inert fire suppression gas deployment system like nitrogen or argon stored in huge quantities they use that in fuel and oil tankers already take away the oxygen no more fire well less fire I guess I do realize ev cars when the batteries cells start running away with a thermal reaction then there’s no stopping them but if we could stop the fires from spreading it would be manageable at least another system that is now used on oil tankers is they use the exhaust gases from the ships main engine and is piped to the cargo holds to eliminate the oxygen this is obviously an emergency measure seeing as most people don’t want a new car that is saturated in diesel fumes food for thought lastly less top Heavy Designs ! Sure u can’t haul as much but I think if the ship doesn’t sink I could do more trips lol also less environmental damage when they don’t sink too id imagine

    • @teebosaurusyou
      @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

      You can't get around crews making mistakes like not closing doors between areas/floors or miscalculating ballast - just like in this video. Car transport is especially vulnerable. It's ALL covered by insurance, the companies involved never suffer.

    • @billrehm3590
      @billrehm3590 Рік тому +1

      The batteries don't need oxygen to burn ,that is why they are hard to put out.

  • @davemanone3661
    @davemanone3661 Рік тому +1

    Boo Hoo!

  • @malcolmmathers2690
    @malcolmmathers2690 Рік тому +7

    so ev cars will save the world ha ha ha

    • @didierpuzenat7280
      @didierpuzenat7280 Рік тому

      No, but they will help to avoid the worst. The best strategy is to have no car at all.

  • @JJ73100
    @JJ73100 Рік тому

    THE BRIT INS COMPANY PAY FOR ALL

  • @slyboogey6263
    @slyboogey6263 Рік тому +2

    So happy to see these Hondas, Mazdas and Kia's sink...crap anyway

  • @markhowell3916
    @markhowell3916 Рік тому +4

    Electric car fires.

  • @BIBIWCICC
    @BIBIWCICC Рік тому +1

    The Golden Ray capsized due to the ballast water requirements set by the US government. If she had been ballasted correctly or like she would have been anywhere else in the world she would have survived. Sadly the US government makes a lot of policies based on information and recommendations from the US coast guard, sadly they have limited maritime experience in the real world and this showed during the salvage operation.

    • @CrazyBear65
      @CrazyBear65 Рік тому +2

      You sound like somebody from some foreign country.

    • @nevadaboy9769
      @nevadaboy9769 Рік тому +1

      This had nothing to do with US coast guard policies, the senior officer inputed incorrect information into the computer thus giving false calculations for the amount of ballast!

    • @teebosaurusyou
      @teebosaurusyou Рік тому

      "Ballast water requirements set by the US government"
      Fuck*ing bullshit. The US coastguard has NOTHING to do with the running of these ships.
      What an assh*le comment.

  • @Ron-u1z
    @Ron-u1z Рік тому +2

    These ships are top heavy. Unstable.

  • @Monarch-Rainman.
    @Monarch-Rainman. Рік тому

    We'll turn THAT area into the modern day New Orleans too, why not? It is just so vEeeRrrrY fun to be so stupid, isn't it? Hosea 4:6!

  • @kennethbowry1521
    @kennethbowry1521 Рік тому +1

    Easy stop transporting EVs, Fools.

    • @Perich29
      @Perich29 6 місяців тому

      they should have had all batteries removed off all EV before shipping them, and have batteries transport on containers on ship on the endge, if fire happens in the container, all they do is just push it overboard.

  • @petedaniels6330
    @petedaniels6330 Рік тому +1

    Can't be good for the planet.did a electric car catch fire