The concept of subsidizing small farmers with the necessities to "meet standards" should be easy unless of course it is by design that they kill small farms as the consolidation is driven by capture.
The key question is, what standards are “high enough”? Are you saying that countries such as Australia, Canada, the USA, and New Zealand have standards that are too low? What is the evidence?
"It doesnt take a data scientist to know that importing agricultural goods produces less emissions than producing them at home" Likely depends on the efficiency of the farms you're importing from, no? A Ukrainian grain farm might be so much better in terms of production that it 'pays for itself' in terms of the Co2 costs to shipping the grain abroad. Why should the Netherlands dedicate a portion of its agriculture to something it isn't good at producing?
The whole emissions thing is a giant fraud you are buying into. Every country should be as close as self sufficient as possible, to guarantee food security for its own citizens. Global trade helps no one except the global greedy brutal uncaring oligarchs.
It's all about control and those that control the food control the people. Thought I'd point that out as I wasn't quite sure what toy meant with your comment. Co2 is the gas of life, makes plants grow and is about 420ppm that's not even 0.01 percent. How that's dangerous is beyond me? Look at climate realism, the guy works for nothing to get the truth out. Also Tony heller. William happier.
My comment was directed to the original comment here. The great climate con including evs, solar, turbines etc. For instance, Evs as we know batteries deteriorate so it's like putting a smaller and smaller petrol tank on a normal car each year, batteries are very difficult to recycle and expensive. You must have seen some videos of batteries in thermal runaway and they are impossible to put out plus highly polluting, much pollution is produced before you even take delivery of your apparently non polluting car but in reality that car has to travel tends of thousands of miles before it becomes net 0 and that's not taking into account how your electric is produced to charge you car. It's all nonsense. I've heard it calculated that there's not enough of the materials for everyone to have an ev. Same with solar re recycling and most are put in land fill. Wind turbines, how often do you see them not working? Worrying. The bbc for the last two months have declared that they've been the hottest on record, yet many people have had their heating on? WE ARE BEING LIED TO ON A MONUMENTAL SCALE. Lastly is 5g a weapon? Is it nothing to do with phones at all or not in a good way? See Gary waterman.
The structural adjustments game the IMF plays on developing nations appears to be at play here as well
Between the left and business, nothing really stands a chance.
The concept of subsidizing small farmers with the necessities to "meet standards" should be easy unless of course it is by design that they kill small farms as the consolidation is driven by capture.
The key question is, what standards are “high enough”? Are you saying that countries such as Australia, Canada, the USA, and New Zealand have standards that are too low? What is the evidence?
rambunctious pocket square
thanks
"It doesnt take a data scientist to know that importing agricultural goods produces less emissions than producing them at home"
Likely depends on the efficiency of the farms you're importing from, no? A Ukrainian grain farm might be so much better in terms of production that it 'pays for itself' in terms of the Co2 costs to shipping the grain abroad. Why should the Netherlands dedicate a portion of its agriculture to something it isn't good at producing?
The whole emissions thing is a giant fraud you are buying into. Every country should be as close as self sufficient as possible, to guarantee food security for its own citizens. Global trade helps no one except the global greedy brutal uncaring oligarchs.
It's all about control and those that control the food control the people.
Thought I'd point that out as I wasn't quite sure what toy meant with your comment.
Co2 is the gas of life, makes plants grow and is about 420ppm that's not even 0.01 percent. How that's dangerous is beyond me?
Look at climate realism, the guy works for nothing to get the truth out. Also Tony heller. William happier.
My comment was directed to the original comment here.
The great climate con including evs, solar, turbines etc.
For instance, Evs as we know batteries deteriorate so it's like putting a smaller and smaller petrol tank on a normal car each year, batteries are very difficult to recycle and expensive. You must have seen some videos of batteries in thermal runaway and they are impossible to put out plus highly polluting, much pollution is produced before you even take delivery of your apparently non polluting car but in reality that car has to travel tends of thousands of miles before it becomes net 0 and that's not taking into account how your electric is produced to charge you car. It's all nonsense.
I've heard it calculated that there's not enough of the materials for everyone to have an ev.
Same with solar re recycling and most are put in land fill.
Wind turbines, how often do you see them not working? Worrying.
The bbc for the last two months have declared that they've been the hottest on record, yet many people have had their heating on?
WE ARE BEING LIED TO ON A MONUMENTAL SCALE.
Lastly is 5g a weapon? Is it nothing to do with phones at all or not in a good way?
See Gary waterman.