The first case - the defendant did not have his story straight. If he was stopped and saw the chick roll through the stop sign, WHY did he decide to proceed to try to make a turn?? And that 'silver spoon' comment... Bro, you were on your way home from your daughter's soccer game - lots of people can't afford kids and there's parents who can't afford to pay for activities like that.
Right Plus if she ran the stop sign after he was already going. The damage would be on the side of his car. It's on the front of his car. So that means she was already going He knows he wasn't paying attention 🙄
I’m in Australia so not I don’t know about American road rules. Forgive me if I’m wrong but the plaintiff was nearly through the intersection when impact happened with the defendants car?!? Wouldn’t that mean that defendant was in the wrong?😳
I would love to know what she means by "You left Baltimore". So what if she left Baltimore what's wrong with that. There is alot to love about Baltimore. Just because you live in California doesn't make you any better than the next person.
"the scene of the crime" 🤣🤣🤣
😆
This is so great 👍👍👍 Thanks Jerry ❤️
These ladies getting all “chicken headed” 😅😂
Plantiffs DEFINITELY Stalking 🤣😭‼️
Dude deserved though. Hit and run, for sure.
"Silver spoon fed"
Sir, bitterness isn't cute. And if she's at fault, why aren't you suing her?
👍🏾
He said "stalk much?" But u 1. LEFT UR WHOLE LICENSE PLATE 2. Did a hit&run right around the corner from where he lives 💀
The first case - the defendant did not have his story straight. If he was stopped and saw the chick roll through the stop sign, WHY did he decide to proceed to try to make a turn??
And that 'silver spoon' comment... Bro, you were on your way home from your daughter's soccer game - lots of people can't afford kids and there's parents who can't afford to pay for activities like that.
If the woman supposedly ran a stop sign and hit him, why isn't he suing her?
EXACTLY
Because he looks like a liar
Right
Right
Plus if she ran the stop sign after he was already going. The damage would be on the side of his car.
It's on the front of his car. So that means she was already going
He knows he wasn't paying attention 🙄
Exactly
She should have got the depreciated value of the phones at the time they were asked for in return
u rock
I’m in Australia so not I don’t know about American road rules. Forgive me if I’m wrong but the plaintiff was nearly through the intersection when impact happened with the defendants car?!? Wouldn’t that mean that defendant was in the wrong?😳
I would love to know what she means by "You left Baltimore". So what if she left Baltimore what's wrong with that. There is alot to love about Baltimore. Just because you live in California doesn't make you any better than the next person.
In the 1st case I think she should have gotten loss wages
Yep
You can’t get lost wages with this type of case. If she rented a car she could have been reimbursed for that. You have to mitigate your damages.
1st
Plus sized fitness doesn't make sense to me, if you're actually fit you aren't "plus sized"; that whole concept contradicts itself
Fitness can also mean trying to be fit and healthy.