माया क्या है; अद्वैत् वेदान्त अनुसार; What is Maya; Illusion- as per Advait Vedanta-by Yogesh Bagdi

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • ==============================================================
    Social Media Links:
    UA-cam subscription link: www.youtube.co...
    Tweeter: / vedantaguruji
    Facebook: / vedanta.guruji.5
    Telegram channel: t.me/VedantaGu...
    Telegram Group: t.me/VedantaGuru
    ===========================================================
    #Maya , #Mithya , #illusion, #advait, #vedanta
    explained by Shri Yogesh Bagdi
    माया क्या है?
    अद्वैत् वेदान्त मे माया की क्या भूमिका है?
    क्या अद्वैत वेदान्त मायावादी है?
    माया और ब्रह्म का क्या सम्बन्ध है?
    क्या ये दोनों अलग अलग सत्ता है, साङ्ख्य के प्रकृति और पुरुष की तरह?
    माया कब से है? ब्रह्मन के पहले या बाद से?
    माया और मोक्ष का क्या संबन्ध है?
    जब अद्वैत् वेदान्त कहता है, ब्रह्म सत्यम जगत मिथ्या, तो क्या ये जगत वास्तव मे झूठ है? क्या इसका कोइ अस्तित्व नही?
    माया को कैसे पार करे?
    What is maya?
    What is Maya's role in Advaita Vedanta?
    Is Advaita Vedanta Mayawadi?
    What is the relationship between Maya and Brahma?
    Are these two different entities, like Prakriti and Purusha?
    Since when is Maya? Before or after Brahman?
    What is the relationship between Maya and Moksha?
    When Advaita Vedanta says, Brahma Satyam Jagat Mithya, is this world unreal? Does it have any existence?
    How to overcome maya?
    Credits:
    All the images are copyright free.
    Image title
    472-4720512_graphic-free use-download-film-projector-clipart-old-video free to use from :
    www.pikpng.com...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 185

  • @ommehta3442
    @ommehta3442 20 днів тому +2

    अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म, सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म... आपने बहुत अच्छा समझाया... आपका धन्यवाद 🙏💐

  • @harsharyan487
    @harsharyan487 3 роки тому +5

    “Brahma satya jagat mithya, jivo brahmaiva naparah”

  • @archanajoshi878
    @archanajoshi878 8 місяців тому +1

    Maya... I think dhuavan hai, ya kohra hai... Jis ke rehne se, kuch spashta dikhayi nahi deta... Hume ujala se, satya se door rakhta hai... Jaise koi hum andhe ho gaye hai... Vah arishtwarga se banta hai... And when purification happens, the light can be seen clearly leading to self discovery & self realisation... Namaste

  • @ranjitdeshmukh6831
    @ranjitdeshmukh6831 2 роки тому +1

    The.secret.
    To.know.without.thinking.that.you.are.GOD.

  • @as8084
    @as8084 2 роки тому +4

    सबका भला करो भगवान सबके कष्ट मिटे भगवान सबको सन्मति दे भगवान सब सुख सच हो सब दुख झूठ धन्यवाद परमात्मा आपका और सब देवी देवता और आत्मा ओंका र का

  • @as8084
    @as8084 2 роки тому +3

    इतना बढ़िया वीडियो कि इसकी तारीफ करने के लिए शब्द नहीं है वाह धन्यवाद

  • @matrixmayaearthandwe6478
    @matrixmayaearthandwe6478 Рік тому +1

    Maya is Matrix. When I saw matrix again I relaised it did explain this complex thing.

  • @VikasSingh-qs4gx
    @VikasSingh-qs4gx 3 роки тому +2

    Thankfully sir Jo aap ne itna simple samjhaya aap bhahut ache ho ...sir aap se ek request h astavakra Gita ko bhi aap ek bar simple trike se samjha do plz plz plz sir.....🙏🙏

  • @IrfanAli-db6kb
    @IrfanAli-db6kb 3 роки тому +2

    Beyond par excellence
    " Brahm " satya hai.
    Maya mithya hai.
    End of all knowledge

  • @rakeshdobhal416
    @rakeshdobhal416 3 роки тому +1

    ब्रह्मन नहीं , ब्रह्म है

  • @dr.janardankumarverma2936
    @dr.janardankumarverma2936 Місяць тому +1

    Excellent 👌👌👌👌

  • @sujbagdi1274
    @sujbagdi1274 4 роки тому +4

    Maya, very well explained Yogeshji. And your examples are amazing, as usual.🙏🕉️

  • @latikashenoy1782
    @latikashenoy1782 4 роки тому +3

    Wowww soo nicely explained 🙏🙏
    Trigunatika Maya 🙏

  • @waytosuccess6906
    @waytosuccess6906 3 роки тому +3

    Thank u sir.. for ur information based on illusion

  • @hemangbipinshah
    @hemangbipinshah 4 роки тому +4

    "I know" is Maya!
    And "I don't known" is also a Maya
    Great explained.
    So just be Brahman and get out of all the confusion.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  4 роки тому +1

      That "I", the real " I" is not maya.. That is Atman.. That is Brahman.
      So know thyself.

    • @IrfanAli-db6kb
      @IrfanAli-db6kb 3 роки тому +3

      Other than " Brahm" No being have such attributes of perfection everything is Maya.

  • @tusharlohar2520
    @tusharlohar2520 2 роки тому +2

    CS student listening this because I was
    Interested in augmented reality 🙏

  • @VirendraSingh-iu2nc
    @VirendraSingh-iu2nc 2 роки тому +2

    Very nice way to explain. Thanks🌹❤👌.

  • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd
    @AdarshSingh-fi7pd 22 дні тому

    संसार माया है और माया नहीं है इसका मतलब संसार भी नहीं है फिर आपने कहा कि जगत ब्रम्ह है, it's confusing please explain.

  • @s.kpanda8156
    @s.kpanda8156 Місяць тому

    If there is nobody except brahman then who is misunderstanding brahman ' this is not nondual but only dualism .

  • @preetikachhawa4847
    @preetikachhawa4847 3 роки тому +3

    Bhaut sunder explain Kiya aap ne.Thank you Guru ji,aap ka bhaut bhaut aabhar🙏🙇

  • @deveshpandey3405
    @deveshpandey3405 2 роки тому +4

    आज माया समझ आ गई सर 🙏🙏😊

  • @krishnajideshpande6211
    @krishnajideshpande6211 Рік тому +2

    I watched so many vedios on maya ,but I didn't understood. But watching your vedio with simple and easy explanation with examples now I am say that I get to know about maya. Thank you very much sir🙏🙏

  • @ravishankarsawant8227
    @ravishankarsawant8227 4 роки тому +3

    The way of explanation is really good to understand topic , thanks sir

  • @TheYellowshuttle
    @TheYellowshuttle 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent videos 👌 Guruji if Brahman is "One" why use the indirect word "advaita" (no two)? Why not use the direct word "Eka" (One)?

    • @kshatrapavan
      @kshatrapavan Рік тому

      In vyavahāra i.e. superficially individual jīvas and jīva and īshvara exhibit dvaita. Dvaita is the most apparent and obvious state of being. Therefore, expressing that atman are one, and that ultimately even atman and brahman are not different requires negation of this illusion of dvaita-ness. Hence Advaita.

  • @bigfootvalley4480
    @bigfootvalley4480 2 роки тому +2

    I have a question. You said in the video that brahman and maya are not two separate entities but actually one. You also gave the example of Projector and Reel, and said that the projector (brahman) shines through the reel of maya. But in my humble opinion, the projector has a separate existence and the reel too has a separate existence, isn't it? ... I mean, the projector can throw light from its end, even without the aid of the reel. Same way, the reel too can exist independently or separately when removed from the proximity of the projector. Since these two (projector and reel) have their own independent existences, is it any good to explain brahman and maya using their help? Thank you.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  2 роки тому

      We are using example from vyavahara jagat, transactional reality.
      So example will hv its limitation.
      But its Brahman's maya shakti which 1st veils the truth and then project it differently.
      Another common example we take is,
      Pot is actually clay. Pot is just naam Rupa, names and form.
      So pot perse has no existence w/o clay. But what we don't see is clay which is manifested as pot.
      Where as clay is the reality. Pot is mithya.
      In vyavahara, u call it pot, but in reality it's clay

  • @KrishnaSharma-ow5xm
    @KrishnaSharma-ow5xm 3 роки тому +2

    Wow very nice post sir dhanyavad or pranam

  • @shyamnarayantiwari4336
    @shyamnarayantiwari4336 4 роки тому +2

    मैं आपके कई वीडियो देख चुका हूं गुरु जी, बढ़िया बताते है।वेदांत के बाद सांख्य के बारे में भी वीडियो बनाये।

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  4 роки тому

      kya aapne humare live Gita session attend kiye hai?
      every Saturday 7pm
      ua-cam.com/play/PLgiYC40Ul9jqAwLjbs358CbPV1DomGbxy.html

  • @ganeshpaul8184
    @ganeshpaul8184 Рік тому +1

    Very nice explore 👌👌👌👌🌹🌹🌹🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @mr.vikrant3583
    @mr.vikrant3583 Рік тому +1

    Great sir, i m philosophy upsc, 😎 lovely and no.1 explanation.

  • @swapnoneelduttamajumdar5049
    @swapnoneelduttamajumdar5049 2 роки тому +2

    Very well explained

  • @joyjeetpaul2218
    @joyjeetpaul2218 2 місяці тому

    Time - Space - Causation or, Name and Form is Maya.

  • @simranraina6291
    @simranraina6291 2 роки тому +2

    Outstanding explanation sir. Thanks. Will u please create video on free will in Advaita vedanta.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  2 роки тому +1

      Sure

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  2 роки тому +1

      Please check QnA based on Bhagavad Gita and Advait Vedanta
      QnA Based on Bhagavad Gita And Advait Vedanta:
      Mostly in QnA 5,6 where we hv discussed about law of karma and concept of birth and death
      ua-cam.com/play/PLgiYC40Ul9joPl7PkoDoevx7B9Sg095Ka.html

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  2 роки тому +1

      U may watch QnA 5,6 where we hv talked about law of karma and concept of birth and death.
      Just check the playlist QnA questions and answers based on Bhagavad Gita and Vedanta

  • @satyamindnectar7052
    @satyamindnectar7052 2 роки тому

    Brahman Alone Exist.
    As long as Brahman non understanding of Brahman also exist in Brahman (Expression of Brahman).
    We understood Brahaman in terms if this world..

  • @rakhiyadav5193
    @rakhiyadav5193 3 роки тому +1

    vedant hi mochya hai

  • @ashutoshprasad7579
    @ashutoshprasad7579 3 роки тому +2

    सर परमात्मा और भगवान् और देवता क्या एक है या इनमे कुछ अंतर है प्लीज इसमें भी वीडियो बनाय प्लीज सर

  • @knowledgehub1498
    @knowledgehub1498 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks guruji

  • @AryanSingh-dh7im
    @AryanSingh-dh7im 3 роки тому +1

    Sir from which book did you get knowledge plz suggest some books sir ❤️

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      Vedanta should be learned under the guidence of a traditional teacher. One should not study the shastra from book by oneself. It will cause confusion and misunderstanding.
      But, for Advait Vedanta follow shankar bhashya

    • @AryanSingh-dh7im
      @AryanSingh-dh7im 3 роки тому

      @@VedantaGuruji thanks guruji

  • @purnanandkarambelkar2400
    @purnanandkarambelkar2400 3 роки тому +1

    Please make a detailed video on man buddhi chitta and ahankara

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      Please join our Thursday session on "Sadhana " only on Zoom.
      Fill the Google form to get updates, u may also join Telegram.
      We are discussing this topic

  • @praneelgandhi8643
    @praneelgandhi8643 Рік тому +1

    Nice explanation sir😊

  • @freecourses1284
    @freecourses1284 Рік тому

    Guruji apka contect nomber dijiye 🙏

  • @nandakishorbarik9010
    @nandakishorbarik9010 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks guruji

  • @sujitbhattacharya3115
    @sujitbhattacharya3115 2 роки тому +1

    Guruji aapko sat sat pranam

  • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd
    @AdarshSingh-fi7pd 22 дні тому

    माया तो है ही नहीं तो फिर उसमें तीन गुण कैसे हो सकते हैं और जो है ही नहीं वो दिख कैसे सकता है? माया reel है और ब्रह्म light माया अगर नहीं है इसका मतलब reel नहीं है तो फिर projection में अलग अलग चित्र कैसे दिख सकते हैं संसार कैसे दिख सकता है अगर माया नहीं है और संसार दिख रहा है इसका मतलब माया है?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  22 дні тому

      माया मिथ्या है, सत्यम नहीं

  • @ATULSHARMA-jj4bh
    @ATULSHARMA-jj4bh 3 роки тому +2

    Sundar ji

  • @swatiupadhyay9709
    @swatiupadhyay9709 3 роки тому +1

    Sir ....vikhshepan ko avidya keh sakte h

  • @hemlatadevikar3189
    @hemlatadevikar3189 3 роки тому +1

    What is mayatatv sir

  • @SambuddhaAkash
    @SambuddhaAkash 2 роки тому

    Your learning seems to be influenced by Maya.

  • @manmathahaldar9221
    @manmathahaldar9221 3 роки тому +1

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @pavansalame
    @pavansalame 3 роки тому

    महाराज जी अभीभी नही समजे माया का मतलब प्रकृति, सृष्टि ,माया ओर दुर्गा ये मा दुर्गा जी के नाम है उनिके फैलाये जाल मे फसकर जीव लख चौरासी में भटकते रहता है

  • @thegaming5115
    @thegaming5115 Рік тому +1

    Sir kya shadi karni chahiye? meri age 25 hai aur main job kar raha hoon.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому +1

      I was just thinking to make a video on this topic
      Or perhaps we may take it in QnA session

    • @thegaming5115
      @thegaming5115 Рік тому

      Ek topic aur hai ki badhti hui population mein बच्चे paida karne chahiye ya nahi. Please cover this topic on that video.

  • @mahadevjyotish9772
    @mahadevjyotish9772 4 роки тому +1

    गुरु जी वेदांत टॉपिक शुरू से समझाएं

  • @OoooKtgh
    @OoooKtgh 9 днів тому

    Sahi h

  • @nitishkumarmandal7984
    @nitishkumarmandal7984 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir. ❤️🙏

  • @karamjitgaddu8015
    @karamjitgaddu8015 Рік тому

    Maya serve the existiience of cosmos. So cosmos will keep going forever.

  • @manmathahaldar9221
    @manmathahaldar9221 3 роки тому +1

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @castelessaastik4655
    @castelessaastik4655 Рік тому

    Sir, maya is attribute so how can it co exist with attributeless BRAHMAN ?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому

      I hv already answer this same question.
      Maya is not an attribute.
      Maya = that which is not.
      Maya is Ishwara's शक्ति, also known as avidya.
      As long as Brahman exist, possibility of non undstanding of Brahman exist in Brahman itself..

  • @rakeshjaywsal1005
    @rakeshjaywsal1005 3 роки тому +1

    Jeev Maya me gira kyu

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      जीव माया का ही हिस्सा है
      Atma सदा थी और रहेगी भी
      Maya और Brahman दोनों अनादि है

  • @prajyotkerkar2452
    @prajyotkerkar2452 4 місяці тому

    Ma bap vo moh maya hai

  • @Advait_Vedanta
    @Advait_Vedanta Місяць тому

    Guruji agar Bramh ka Mul Sharoop Nirgun Nirakaar hein, to Shat , Chit , Anand, kiya Gun nehi hue, to Bramha mein to iea tin gun hein, to Bramh ko Nirgun kiu Kaha jata hein.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Місяць тому

      उसके लिए in 3 गुणों को समझना होगा. क्यु की ये गुण नहीं है.

  • @dishau7541
    @dishau7541 9 місяців тому

    🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @ashishrajacharya2837
    @ashishrajacharya2837 3 роки тому

    Guru with due respect aptow Bramgyani hongya tow apka maya ha ki chaligahi

  • @aeonsleo2
    @aeonsleo2 3 роки тому +1

    Is Maya same for each person ? Does any other person or the objects exist because of someone else's avidya or it is just my Maya? Is my Maya same as your Maya or Is there is a common Maya ?
    If a person dies and is enlightened at the same time. His Maya ends but the generic maya lives on ? Who lives on and who is realised in this case ?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому +1

      It's not individual maya.
      It's Ishwara's shakti mool avidya, the root of all avidya.
      Because of this trigunatmika maya whole world manifests

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому +1

      When one gains knowledge he is free from maya

    • @aeonsleo2
      @aeonsleo2 3 роки тому

      @@VedantaGuruji Thank you Guruji. I have few more questions. If a person is enlightened he is free from Maya. Who is he in this case. Is he Brahman or an individual human personality?
      When you say a person is free from Maya, does he realize that he is not an individual but Brahman ? How does the Maya exist for him still ? Shouldn't the Maya disappear and along with that his form, identity the world etc like when one dies.
      If a person's reality is Brahman and if that is realized shouldn't the Brahman's avidya is rid off the the whole Maya collapses ?
      What exactly happens during individual's enlightenment and why the Maya for everyone else carries on ?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      Realisation of one is like a dreamer waking up. What happens to his dream world.? What happens to a dreamer?
      What happens to other people in his dream?

  • @indraraj6812
    @indraraj6812 2 роки тому

    Why Maya? If it is ananta who created Maya and why? Who created Brahmana and why?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  2 роки тому +1

      No one created maya nor Brahman. They are anadi

  • @freecourses1284
    @freecourses1284 Рік тому

    To me kon hu?

  • @kshudhashantimisalgruha2601

    🙏

  • @miteshrajsrivastava7257
    @miteshrajsrivastava7257 4 роки тому

    Can u explain this from Vedic scripture!!!!

  • @vijaypandhare3905
    @vijaypandhare3905 Рік тому

    Confused
    परब्रह्म को ब्रह्म कह रहे है l
    ब्रह्म - माया एक joint phenomenon है l
    जिसे निचे दिये भी शब्दोमे वर्णन करते है l
    पुरुष - प्रकृती
    mind - matter
    नाम - रुप
    आभासी चेतन - जड

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому +1

      परब्रह्म and ब्रह्म और ब्रह्मन् are same
      As per traditional vedanta.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому

      Brahman and maya are not joined or so.
      It's bettet u learn from any traditional teacher or else such confusion is guaranteed .

  • @prateeksingh9681
    @prateeksingh9681 3 роки тому

    ये कहानी कहाँ से लिऐ हो।

  • @swatiupadhyay9709
    @swatiupadhyay9709 3 роки тому

    Gud afternoon sir...I wanna ask one question.....is Avidya hides brahman????

  • @charvibakshi904
    @charvibakshi904 3 роки тому

    Sir if we take birth and then die and usually it is said that it's a circle and to break it..... we have to do bhakti.Right.
    What's the right way of doing bhakti in grahsth ashram?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      No.
      It's not bhakti to break the cycle. But it's the knowledge. Because ignorance is the cause.
      Bhakti is needed even to get knowledge from a teacher.

    • @charvibakshi904
      @charvibakshi904 3 роки тому

      @@VedantaGuruji sir how can we take your online classes.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      Join our telegram group,
      U will be updated for all our sessions

  • @miteshrajsrivastava7257
    @miteshrajsrivastava7257 4 роки тому

    Aavrn Shakti or vikchhep Shakti ka concept ramanandacharya ke phylosphy ka hissa hai.

  • @prakashrath9797
    @prakashrath9797 4 роки тому +1

    🙏

  • @ajayakumargandha1529
    @ajayakumargandha1529 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent

  • @Av-vi5vs
    @Av-vi5vs 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you aapke video ka intezzar rahegaa.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  4 роки тому +1

      Every Saturday we come live on youtube for the "Essence of Gita"
      Today evening at 7pm (1st Saturday of every month )
      ua-cam.com/video/XYWGcIa-uHY/v-deo.html

  • @ravidhyani1011
    @ravidhyani1011 4 роки тому

    Mere ko kuch bhi samajh mein nahi aaya

  • @devkiputragitam...8966
    @devkiputragitam...8966 3 роки тому +1

    aapko soundary lahri ke adhyayan ki aavashykta hai ...
    ..

    • @Swadharma20
      @Swadharma20 6 місяців тому +1

      Kyu bhai

    • @devkiputragitam...8966
      @devkiputragitam...8966 6 місяців тому

      ​@@Swadharma20माया और ब्रम्ह के तादात्म्य हेतु

    • @Swadharma20
      @Swadharma20 6 місяців тому

      @@devkiputragitam...8966 ok Bhai

  • @drsudhirtaneja1227
    @drsudhirtaneja1227 4 роки тому +1

    Brahm gyaan kaisey prapt karey sir

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  4 роки тому

      Please attend our live QnA session on every 1st Saturday of the month at 7pm.
      If possible we may take your Qn tommorow, 1st August 20.

  • @snehyadav5110
    @snehyadav5110 4 роки тому

    Interesting way sir..boring nhi feel hotaa ...

  • @vinayakashenoyk4622
    @vinayakashenoyk4622 3 роки тому

    Why we are cobwebbed in old philosophy let us explore ,we are hanging on the old examples given like rajju sarpa ,three kinds of state is jagrat Swapna and susupti we are not giving the importance to our realisation only juggling in Sanskrit words 🙏
    Advaitis impose themselves impose false entity on reality and telling us to remove ,that is their adhyaropaapavada theory .

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      Ok
      1st do one thing.
      Now make 2+2=5
      New mathematics.
      Ask sun to rise from west.
      Ask gravitation to pull up.
      Ask fire to change its nature to spread coolness.
      Before blabbering, try to understand atleast 1%of our ancient knowledge

    • @vinayakashenoyk4622
      @vinayakashenoyk4622 3 роки тому

      @@VedantaGuruji sir with due respect I am not at all arguing or counter acting ,because I agree that I am ajnani and try to know the truth even we can say there is nothing to know we only forgot the real truth about ourselve as mentioned in yoga sutras .And about 2+2=5 ,the Mathematica is only a tool to define natural phenomena ,this maths is ok for vyavaharika but fails in explain nature so later equation come like 2x+2y=5 ,now to failing to bind the nature in modern mathematics like Einstein theory ,topology etc the process is going on but failing .I am extremely sorry if I hurt by any means ,only by realisation one may know the truth but who has to know ?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      1st get the knowledge, go to near by traditional teacher offline or online.
      Attend the regular session, systematically. Ask Questions if you don't understand before making any sweeping statement.
      It was not hurting me but insult to our age old proven shastras and rishis.

  • @gamitsagar3490
    @gamitsagar3490 4 роки тому +1

    Tq sir

  • @arkanjanchatterjee8102
    @arkanjanchatterjee8102 3 роки тому

    Tell us about vedanta sara

  • @mahadevjyotish9772
    @mahadevjyotish9772 4 роки тому +1

    वेदांत के अनुसार त्रिदेव की कोई परिकाष्ठा है वेदांत अनुसार त्रिदेवों के विषय में मार्गदर्शन करें

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  4 роки тому

      आपका मतलब ब्रह्मा विष्णु महेश से है?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  4 роки тому +1

      क्या आपने नया वीडियो देखा,
      "माया क्या है?"
      Ye अद्वैत वेदान्त का सबसे महत्तवपूर्ण विषय है.
      उसे समझे बिना advait Vedanta कभी नहीं समझ सकते.

    • @mahadevjyotish9772
      @mahadevjyotish9772 4 роки тому

      @@VedantaGuruji जी गुरु जी माया के बारे में मैंने वीडियो देखा क्या माया के सत्त्व रज तम गुण ही त्रिदेव हैं

    • @mahadevjyotish9772
      @mahadevjyotish9772 4 роки тому

      @@VedantaGuruji जी बिल्कुल

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  4 роки тому

      नहीं

  • @AnkurSingh-mh9ot
    @AnkurSingh-mh9ot Рік тому +1

    Guruji this means reincarnation is not true at all right? As there is no individual jiva. There is just brahman. There is only one soul and that is brahman.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому

      U r mixing 2different levels.
      From पारमार्थिक point of view, there is only Brahman.
      From व्यावहारिक point of view see duality.
      Brahman is as its para prakrati
      Brahman as जगत, jiva, सृष्टि, its apara prakrati.
      Like for example,
      U are u as jiva, the individual. That is ur reality in this example, but u are also a son, a student, a brother, a friend, a citizen etc. But all these are ur different manifestation, roles.

    • @AnkurSingh-mh9ot
      @AnkurSingh-mh9ot Рік тому

      @@VedantaGuruji
      Guru ji sorry I cannot read hindi
      I guess what I am saying Guru ji is that brahman is never born and never dies. Only individual body dies. And it is individual body which has ego and mind and any concept of soul/jiva. What my body and mind right now is due to genetics, upbringing/nuture, and so.e desires of others mind-body systems that are not here anymore in which ever way god wanted.
      Thank You Guru ji!

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому +1

      I wl suggest you to watch other videos also in the same series.
      Mainly 3 orders of reality.
      Vedanta is not newspaper or novel or self help book nor a pep talk which any can just read and understand.
      There are various levels, to unfold. To understand vedanta we really need that shraddha and commitment and consistent effort
      More than what we need to understand mathematics.
      So have patience and go step by step. One should never jump to any conclusion.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому +1

      Do want us to make videos in English also?

    • @AnkurSingh-mh9ot
      @AnkurSingh-mh9ot Рік тому +1

      @@VedantaGuruji
      Replying to both comments
      Sure Guruji that will be nice too.
      Hum hindi bol aur samhaj sakte hei, lekin hum India se bahar pedha hui teh toh par nehe sakta huin haha
      I agree Guru ji. For last 4 years I am constantly thinking about this and self examining and trying to learn. But different people give different answers. The view I have right now is built off of hours of thinking. But to explain it I would need to write a few pages. Maybe if its ok I can email you and when you have time I can discuss.
      Thank You Guruji
      Ankur

  • @satyampandey9444
    @satyampandey9444 9 місяців тому

    Sir Maya UA-cam channel ko aap subscribe karna ka liya kha raha hai to ya bhi Maya hai UA-cam channel ka subscriber jada ho gaya ya bhi to Maya hai

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  9 місяців тому

      Haan sab maya hi hai, 😊
      Channel bhi, knowledge bhi.
      Aap bhi mai bhi.
      Subscribe bhi.
      Isiliye koi issue nahi hai.
      We don't mix satyam and mithya.

    • @satyampandey9444
      @satyampandey9444 9 місяців тому

      @@VedantaGuruji aap ko glat samajna hamara udsay nhi tha sir bas man ma question aaya puch liya satyam kay hai sir

  • @vimalaxidhagat1455
    @vimalaxidhagat1455 4 роки тому +3

    Amazingly.... It is in the sleep state which is tamasic that happiness is experienced.

  • @harikrishan5031
    @harikrishan5031 4 роки тому

    Bahut bakwas banaya hai

    • @rishabhyadav6705
      @rishabhyadav6705 Рік тому

      Phle dimag ho ga na tab smj ayega dimag ne dham ye sab ka gobar jo bhar liya hai abrahmic bakwas bate jo sun li hai kaha smj ayegi philosophy 😂😂

  • @bhaskaravadvaith8231
    @bhaskaravadvaith8231 3 роки тому

    Your explanation of Advaitha has full if dvaita in it, in step 2 it’s mentioned “as long as brahman exists “ the word as long as represents time and brahman is beyond time brahman can’t be “as long as” because brahman is the only that exists, “as long as brahman exists” also raises the question what after brahman ceases to exist hope u understand this question is wrong and also ur explanation.
    Next in example of film and projector the light is mentioned as brahman how can a light be compared to brahman as light keeps constantly changing brahman never changes the screen is always compared to brahman this is common example and please refer good source regarding this example
    Next in clay and pot example it’s mentioned “not to understand clay as clay is present in clay only” its like telling not to understand brahman as brahman is present in brahman only but unfortunately ur giving complete explanation for maya so not to understand clay as clay is not in clay but it’s in maya
    Tamas gives dravya shakti it would be really good if a source for this is mentioned
    It would be better if you understand the difference between anandamaya kosha and brahmananda please mention the reference which says ananda of brahman exhibits tamas shakti dont u think u need to understand properly before making video and adding ‘um’ to each word doesn’t make u expert in Sanskrit as there are no words like that

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      U need to understand what I hv said.
      Go beyond words. Try to. Understand the explanation.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      When I said as long as Brahman exists,... Their is pun in my saying.
      And ofcourse we mean and maintain that Brahman अलोन exists.
      But for people who are exposed to the topic for the 1st time, we hv to go step by step

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      In the example of film and screen and light, yes I chose to say light as Brahman. Because screen may be there or not like in virtual reality, but no projection is possible w/o light.
      Light is subtler than screen, more pervasive.
      Also, this is not traditional example.
      And I will firmly maintain the same.
      You may think again and try to come out of preconceived, set ideas.
      Think originally

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      And yes non understanding of clay as clay, this potential is there only in Brahman. Because Brahman alone exists. And that non understanding is mool avidya, maya.
      Non understanding of something which doesn't exist, is not possible. And existence of maya is dependent on Brahman not independant.

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  3 роки тому

      Ofcourse anandmaya kosha is not brahmanad.
      Anandmaya is the known experience, brahmanad is not known.
      So principle of knowledge is we move from the known to the unknown.
      One cannot teach unknown from unknown.

  • @DeepakKumar-ju2nd
    @DeepakKumar-ju2nd 4 роки тому +3

    आप खुद ही confused हैं ! सत रज तम जब माया के गुण हैं तो माया का अस्तित्व सिद्ध हुआ इस लिए मूलभूत द्रव्य तीन सिद्ध होते हैं, आत्मा ,परमात्मा और प्रकृति , सत को तो हम परमात्मा मे मिला सकते हैं किंतु तम व रज को परमात्मा का हिस्सा कहें तो परमात्मा मे दोष आ जाएगा क्योकि तम ही जड़ है, न वह आत्मा है न परमात्मा !इससे प्रकृति भी अनादि सिद्ध हुई!!

    • @veershorts5142
      @veershorts5142 Рік тому +1

      आत्मा यानी परमात्मा तो इन तीनों गुणों से परे हैं। और सांख्य दर्शन के अनुसार तो भगवान ने सृष्टि बनाई ही नहीं है क्योंकि भगवान को ये दुनिया बनाने की कोई जरूरत ही नहीं है।

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  Рік тому +1

      Yes.
      Even as per Advait Vedanta ishwar has not created....
      This is subject to understand or else it wl lead to total confusion

    • @blaa...blaaa...blaaaa
      @blaa...blaaa...blaaaa Рік тому

      आत्मा परमात्मा में कोई भेद नही है मूर्ख, द्वेष बुद्धि के धनि जाहिल,
      पहले अपने कॉन्सेप्ट क्लियर कर किसी ओर खुद से पढ़ यूट्यूब ज्ञानी मत बन शास्त्र ज्ञानी बन…
      ओर परमात्मा के गुण उनके कार्यों के कारण है ना कि उनमें कोई विकार है…

    • @zkx-ly6on
      @zkx-ly6on 10 місяців тому

      Sahi hai

    • @sangeetapathak1675
      @sangeetapathak1675 8 місяців тому +2

      Confused हैं , का अर्थ हुआ भृमित हैं अर्थात माया-ग्रस्त हैं , तो इसमें हर्ज क्या है ?
      ......आप कहीं मायापति तो नहीं ?

  • @jyotsanasingh4769
    @jyotsanasingh4769 3 роки тому +2

    Bahut acche se apne bataya, Thank you very much. Maya se hi humme confusion hota hai, Maya se hi humme bhrahman ka gayan hota hai

  • @chitravenkatsubramanian1807
    @chitravenkatsubramanian1807 4 роки тому +3

    Concept of Maya made easy. Thank you Sir.

  • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd
    @AdarshSingh-fi7pd 8 місяців тому

    ब्रम्ह तो बदलता नहीं है लेकिन संसार तो लगातार बदल रहा है तो ब्रम्ह संसार कैसे हो सकता है?

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  8 місяців тому

      ब्रह्म संसार नहीं है, संसार ब्रह्म है
      मिट्टी घड़ा नहीं है, घडा मिट्टी है.
      घड़ा बदलता है मिट्टी नहीं

    • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd
      @AdarshSingh-fi7pd 8 місяців тому

      @@VedantaGuruji आप कह रहे हैं कि संसार ब्रम्ह है तो फिर चलायमान जगत अचल ब्रम्ह कैसे हो सकता है? साक्षी ब्रह्म निर्गुण है, साक्षी ब्रम्ह का कोई रूप नहीं है, साक्षी का कोई व्यवहार नहीं है क्योंकि वह निर्गुण है, साक्षी ब्रम्ह अचल है और संसार में तीन गुण हैं, संसार में नाम, रूप और व्यवहार है, संसार चलायमान है तो फिर गुणवान जगत निर्गुण ब्रह्म कैसे हो सकता है? कृपया बताएँ।

    • @VedantaGuruji
      @VedantaGuruji  8 місяців тому

      माया triginatmika है. Shift the vision.
      Again I m repeating ब्रह्म जगत नहीं, माया की वज़ह से ब्रह्म जगत के रूप मे प्रतीत होता है
      Try to understand pot and clay example

    • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd
      @AdarshSingh-fi7pd 7 місяців тому

      @@VedantaGuruji माया कैसे एक ब्रह्म(existence consciousness bliss) को बहुत रूप में दिखाती है, कैसे एक consciousness को अलग-अलग शरीर में दिखाती है?

    • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd
      @AdarshSingh-fi7pd 7 місяців тому

      @@VedantaGuruji माया को काटे कैसे?

  • @miteshrajsrivastava7257
    @miteshrajsrivastava7257 4 роки тому

    This phylosphy is anti vedic.

    • @vikassutariya8323
      @vikassutariya8323 3 роки тому

      Give praman🙏

    • @satyamindnectar7052
      @satyamindnectar7052 Рік тому +1

      This Philosophy is Vedic.
      Iskcon philosophy is anti vedic.

    • @rishabhyadav6705
      @rishabhyadav6705 Рік тому

      😂😂vedic kal ki ek matra philosophy yahi hai tune sare shastra padh liya jo tum claim kar rha ki ye anti vedic ki bas iskcon ke hagupad ke sex slavo ki bat sun ke aa gya bta har ek shastra me ek matra advaita hai ye dikha skta tum jaise nitthale abrahmic to madhyakalin bharat me panpe aur unhe ke vicharo se prabhawit aur tum Abramico ne sanatan me ghusa diya jaise ki dham jana hai 😂😂 0:03