Mixed Strategies Nash Equilibrium: The Math

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • This video walks through the math of solving for mixed strategies Nash Equilibrium. Two other sister videos to this are:
    Mixed Strategies Intuition: • Mixed Strategies Nash ...
    Mixed Strategies Calculus ay To Solve: • Solving Mixed Strategy...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @booly7621
    @booly7621 2 роки тому +67

    Literally the best explanation of the math portion on youtube, thanks so much!

  • @MartyAuer
    @MartyAuer Рік тому +42

    this helped but how in the world are you gonna put "right" on the left and "left" on the right

  • @Rupcoris
    @Rupcoris Рік тому +5

    Thank you so much, I had my test today and this video helped me tremendously and saved me lots of reading through a hard to make out book.

  • @lashau7056
    @lashau7056 2 роки тому +1

    This is very good I have seen many videos by far the best explanation

  • @lawrencejrnjobvu2869
    @lawrencejrnjobvu2869 Рік тому

    Best mixed strategies video I have come across ❤

  • @hiddecroes8053
    @hiddecroes8053 Рік тому +2

    what can you do when you the p's in the equation cancel each other out. leaving you with no final probability. does this signal a pure strategy as only option. or does this just mean i made a mistake

  • @lizhuoyou6722
    @lizhuoyou6722 9 місяців тому

    Very clear and helpful! Thanks!

  • @guedes_133
    @guedes_133 4 місяці тому

    Óptima explicação!

  • @ee7692
    @ee7692 2 місяці тому

    What is your accent - Canadian/Minnesota???

  • @ugurbayar9986
    @ugurbayar9986 4 місяці тому

    Fcking amazing woman, thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @younesslaoui8327
    @younesslaoui8327 6 місяців тому

    Great video!

  • @mariohanzek712
    @mariohanzek712 5 місяців тому

    I would like to watch your videos on the subject of behavioral game theory. I'm actually considering a thesis in that area.

  • @nimra9679
    @nimra9679 Рік тому

    Please please tell how to find pure strategy Nash equilibrium

  • @mcatucla
    @mcatucla Рік тому +1

    thank you legend

  • @CJ-jy9pd
    @CJ-jy9pd 7 місяців тому

    great video but having both players going either right or left makes it a bit confusing, should've given one of the players the option of going up or down

  • @flying_horse
    @flying_horse 7 місяців тому

    I honestly just need an example without numbers
    Just with letters . Just swapthe corespondind letter , do math , have solution

  • @myo32342
    @myo32342 4 місяці тому

    I did not understand anything about this topic in my class, but you saved my life. Keep doing videos for us, plz.

  • @zeycus
    @zeycus Рік тому

    Very nice explanation, but I am having a hard time to generalize it. Suppose each player has 3 choices: L(left), C(enter) and R(ight). With the same idea you get a linear system of 3 equations for unknowns {pL, pC, pR}. If its solutions is valid because all values are in [0, 1], perfect. But what do you do otherwise? For instance, if you find the solution of the system be pL=-0.4, pC=0.1 and pR=1.3. They add up to 1.0, but they are not right. I am guessing the equilibrium point is somehow in the frontier, a few of these probabilities will be 0 and the associated strategy can be ignored. But how do you calculate this? Moreover, what happens if the players have a different number of choices? Then I am getting too many equations, or too few.

    • @StevenHoehner-mz4jz
      @StevenHoehner-mz4jz Рік тому

      First, eliminate all strictly dominated strategies. If there are none and all 9 cells of the payoff matrix survive, then yes it can be formulated as a system of linear equations.
      In the example in the video, for the unknown probabilities in the MSNE, one uses p and 1-p for P1, rather than p_1 and p_2, and uses q and 1-q for P2 rather than q_1 and q_2. In the same way, we can reduce the number of equations in a larger system. For example, if both players have three moves as you describe, then one can use p_1, p_2 and 1-p_1-p_2 for the moves of P1 and q_1, q_2 and 1-q_1-q_2 for the moves of P2.

  • @SatyamSingh-vn7wz
    @SatyamSingh-vn7wz 4 місяці тому

    You've given a more intuitive explanation than my professor, thanks for helping!

  • @shlomozerbib388
    @shlomozerbib388 2 роки тому

    ty for the demonstration :)

  • @laszlomadarasz5894
    @laszlomadarasz5894 Рік тому +1

    this helped a lot thank you

  • @esraaelfatih2601
    @esraaelfatih2601 2 роки тому

    Aslo what if it was coordination game,and X greater than 0 is the bias of player 1 to play left

  • @hectormonsalve7524
    @hectormonsalve7524 7 місяців тому

    Excellent explanation. Thank you.

  • @AdGameRr
    @AdGameRr 2 роки тому

    What if both players go reyt?

  • @lucarondon
    @lucarondon Рік тому

    BRAVA ASHLEY, MOLTO PIU SEMPLICE DI QUELLO CHE HO IMPARATO ALL'UNIVERSITà. GRAZIE.

  • @omarsafwat7338
    @omarsafwat7338 Рік тому

    thanks a lot very nice simple explanation

  • @dimipps
    @dimipps 2 роки тому +1

    period ...

  • @brian1206
    @brian1206 9 місяців тому

    You're a great teacher thanks so much

  • @pomegranate8593
    @pomegranate8593 10 місяців тому

    GREATNESS!!!!

  • @konekosamvs3264
    @konekosamvs3264 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much this was an absolutely incredible video!

  • @jayantmishra5391
    @jayantmishra5391 Рік тому

    Thank you mam !!

  • @elvitd6704
    @elvitd6704 Рік тому

    the best video!

  • @adrianamacamo8541
    @adrianamacamo8541 2 роки тому

    thank you so very much!!!!!

  • @Jim_Bag
    @Jim_Bag Рік тому

    Where is the 3P coming from?

  • @esraaelfatih2601
    @esraaelfatih2601 2 роки тому

    Can I ask for something? If they asked what are p,q probability of player 1 and 2 to play left respectively ,or to play right ? It's the same thing you did right?