Great video. I'm amazed at the level of mathematical theory used in your videos. And how easily you manage it. You're one of the few you-tubers that excel at both theory and common practice. It confuses me, just sitting here watching you . But I do enjoy what you do, it's very educational 😉
Bro, I need pen and paper to make heads or tails of it, and even then I gotta double check everything. The editing makes it look easy, but it's approachable if you give yourself time to erase things and shuffle them around a couple times. Then it should "click" in your head and feel awesome, especially if you can see picture of it on an oscilloscope and touch the knobs yourself. You can do it!
@GreatScott! - My research on this topic indicates that you can greatly extend the power transfer distance by interposing PASSIVE COILS (NX) with the same resonant frequency _near or in between_ the transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX). In fact, one paper on the subject said that the power transfer Coupling Efficiency (CE) improves as the *square* of the number N of coils. (This strikes me as being very analogous to the case with a Phased Array improving as the number of elements squared.) For Inductively Coupled Coils, the equation for *ideal* Coupling Efficiency would be like CE = 1 - (1/N^2). Thus for just 1 coil, CE = 0 (you can't transfer power at all if there is just one coil), while for N=2, CE = 0.75, for N=3, CE = 0.89, for N=4, CE = 0.9375, for N=5, CE = 0.96, etc. That equation indicates that with an infinite number of coils, Coupling Efficiency would be perfect, 1.0, unity. In reality, those numbers should be multiplied by your efficiency with your basic 2 coils, TX and RX, immediately adjacent to each other. The paper also spoke of creating a whole _mesh network_ of the passive coils, for very high CE anywhere within a whole house. I would love to see if you can reproduce those results, GreatScott... or anyone else!
Have you tried the experiment with a metal backing plate (pizza Pan?) behind the transmitting coil? Currently the energy is being transmitted in all directions from the coil. If you use a metal plate behind it you should have more energy directed to the receiving coil. This would be even more effective if the backing plate had a rim around it that would go around the circumference of the coil. Perhaps you could do a video trying different shapes of metal backing plate: flat, bowl shaped, parabolic, etc, or even tin foil shaped around the back 270 degrees of the coil with only the front side of the coil exposed in the intended direction of transmission.
I would have expected the induced currents in a backing plate would increase the losses, as the plate represents a shorted turn. I have often wondered how contactless mobile phone charges manage to avoid such losses in the phone PCB copper earth plane. Such coils are always operated in a resonant configuration, but at such low frequencies that the distance to the ground plane cannot be significant in terms of wavelength.
Ideally a parabolic dish on both sides would be the most efficient back reflector and you can get ones of about the size of the coils being used here at a junkyard by looking for an old satellite TV dish, but a backing plate would still makke a huge difference.
@@greatscottlab Did you took in consideration impedance of free air space? Another question what if coil is in conical spiral shape? And why u dont try to use one size for transmitter and another size for receiver ? Regarding metal plate google "Investigation of the influence of a large steel plate on the magnetic field distribution of a magnetic proximity detection system". There are some tests done already.
@@nigeljohnson9820 The reflector does not have a matched impedance to the coil transmitter or receiver since you ground it with as low of a resistance as possible. If the impedance of two oscillating circuits is not of the same value, the power is reflected away from the receiving end based on the difference in impedance between the two circuits. The circuits also have to have similar inherent resonant frequencies or share one or more harmonic frequencies with each other or the power bounces off of the interface between the circuits.
Great video, as always, and really glad that Elektor are sponsoring you as they're much more relevant to electronics hobbyists than (not round) Space or the VPN companies that seem to sponsor a lot of stuff on UA-cam...
Yep. I am happy to have them as sponsors. I try to stay away from VPNs and such for this particular reason that is has not much to do with electronics.
Shocked, that Elektor Magazine is still around. It faded from my orbit just as 'Wireless World' had done similarly before it. Both, during 50 my years of interest. Thought that hobby electronics had miniaturised into surface-mount oblivion. Your experiments demonstrating mind-blowing modern home lab equipment - so refreshing. Thanks.
The real difficulty of the Q measurement is that it is the tangent of the phase angle. Because tangent function diverges at 90 degrees and you are measuring phase angles close to that value, you'll need to measure the phase angle very precisely, because even a small error in the angle will result in a big difference in the Q calculation.
Excellently comprehensive coverage of the topic !! No way did they get into anything near that level of information detail when I went to Electrical Engineering school !! THANKS !! ;)
Fantastic, dude! Really amazing work! 😃 It's really interesting how physical differences in the used wire changes things! Anyway, stay safe and creative there! 🖖😊
Could adding a "core" between the windings shape the field and increase coupling? How else could you do directed power transfer / beam forming? What about the power at a multiple of the wavelength at a different node? Could you tap more power from the other side, reflected about the field symmetry line?
All this as was shown is happening in the Near Field of the coils, at a distance much less than ONE wavelength, so the usual assumptions about multiple wavelengths do not apply.
Congratulations more than 100 comments within 1 hour of you posting the video. This shows that your content was,is and will always be amazing. Keep it up!
Where do you draw the line when he should switch to using antenna designs for best transmission and recieving results eg focused or directed transmitter instead of just air coil transformer
Only Great Scott will take time to investigate something like this on UA-cam. As a fellow electronics enthusiast i really appreciate your builds and videos.
Amazing and satisfying new intro man. Really like it. I liked your previous one as well, but this one is clean and quick and does the job. Like everything you create, really big fan bro and thanks for teaching us so much and abundantly about so many things
Thanks for the video on Inductors and charging! I am having a "debate" with some of my EE textbooks... which state that there is a "Back EMF" when charging an Inductor and a "Back EMF" when current is suddenly stopped. I don't have the proper equipment to do the testing but when I tried to look at this using an oscilloscope across the inductor I was not able to see any measurable "back emf" on the inductor when it was charging, but. there was a voltage drop. Perhaps I am doing this wrong? The other thing I don't understand is when I "suddenly cut the power" they call the electricity coming from the Inductor a "Back EMF", but in my testing, the voltage from the Inductor was the same as the source polarity. Perhaps I am doing something wrong?
❤❤❤ Try wireless Dipole Antenna instead of a circular coil. Saw videos from another channel. Dipole antenna is no affected by distance 😊😊😊😊. Please try on next video😢😢😢❤❤❤❤❤
Although I don't understand it, such great content, just wish your videos were a bit longer honestly, I hear how YT tells creators to keep them short, well I don't think those of us that really enjoy this kind of content care much for shot videos, pack in the details!!! Thanks sir!
Now that looks like a nice LCR meter. Probably costs a pretty penny. Edit: yep. Phew. I mean, it's less than I expected, if I had a good use for it, then it wouldn't be too bad.
Thanks for all your inspirational vids! Now you are at the coil section anyway, maybe it is an interesting project to create an Axial Flow Generator? That would be awesome!
Could you post schematics. I would like to do the numbers. Are you sure it was resonantly tuned? Remember even a led resistance could change the frequency.. What frequency are you using?
I might be too low on caffeine, but I didn't notice any method of impedance matching the load to the receive coil? Seems like measuring the short circuit current of the receive coil would actually decrease the current, lowering the magnetic field, and the breaking down the coupling of the coils. Maybe I didn't follow it exactly.
You should try some more neatly wound coils to reduce the parasitic inductance and increase Q, styles to try include solenoid, pancake, spider, and basket weave.
Did you try to use some ferrite material inside and outside of your 2 coils ? Could they concentrate more of the magnetic field and increase efficiency ?
Can we try to have compensation circuit for both sides? Or maybe we can try capacitive wireless power transfer next time! My undergraduate thesis is about CPT, and I found that theoretically we can reach about 60%+ at 1MHz frequency at large distances using a double-sided LC compensation circuit .
I did strip out an old anti shoplifting system, which used as coils long lengths of 20mm by 2mm thick aluminium strip, wound into large coils, with an insulating tape layer on the one side of the coil. Self supporting in the case, and the wide strip made for very low loss, though of course the higher capacitance made the self resonant frequency lower. However, seeing as it ran at audio frequencies for the most part, and at around 50W in the transmit coils, this was not too much of a problem. You could simply use a thick self adhesive foam tape on the one side, instead of the thin polyamide they used, and get a much better coil performance. Also wind the coil with a small offset per winding, so they do not fully overlap, so as to have a zig zag strip coil.
Is there any data (done by experts or enthousiast) to compare it ? Like what is the more efficient wireless power coil possible, and how exactly ? I'm also thinking that putting a sort of bowl or satellite dish better emitter/receiver could improve a bit more the efficiency !
I always thought that the inductance is a measure specific to a coil and not varies with frequency. I also used to calculate it with its physical dimensions (length, diameter), number of turns and core permeability. It is new for me that L is different at various frequencies. XL on the other hand (impedance) is related to the frequency. What am I missing?
I bought a bunch of pre-made wireless leds and have used several in my action figures as weapons lights or a scale flashlight and in flame effects to illuminate them but i need a much better coil to get some usable range.
There is a winding method for coils often referred to as "fast coil" or basket coil which basically tries to eliminate the parallel strands of wire as much as possible by having them cross at an angle as they are wound on a flat circular form. (2d donut)
Professor Marin Soljacic of MIT proposed strongly coupled magnetic resonance (SCMR), and they were able to transfer 60 watts wirelessly with ~40% efficiency over distances in excess of 2 meters. Can you show us!??!?!?!
If I had to guess just spacing the windings into a cylindrical helix about 1 cm between the turns will ramp up the srf? Analogous to a Tesla coil primary which is a pancake or a spaced out helix.
Can you please provide detailed information on how you stretched the electron beam horizontally? (Your previous video on turning CRT TV into a crude oscilloscope)
From my experiments the larger the coil diameter the larger the distance you can go. I made 2 coils 6ft around and got a much larger distance apart. Just something to keep in mind, maybe you could try that as well and see how much larger the distance is. Start with double the size you have and try the same experiments.
The 3 fundamental, passive components (Resistor, Capacitor, Inductors), can be "built" using wire as the building block (no other component is needed) You can also build logic blocks with only wire as well. Which means wire is by far, the most versatile component, if you are creative enough!
You can make logic with wire?? I only know about mag amps those have a core. Or maybe something using thermal nonlinear properties? Relays that are based on attraction between two coils?
Hi, ich habe eine Frage ich habe ein FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER benutzt um 215vDC zu bekommen und ich wollte fragen ob ich 215vDC an einer Glühbirne benutzen kann und was ich dabei achten muss
Are you going to look at impendence matching with air for both of the circuits next? Also, I assume that the shape of the coils that you are using takes into account not having a matching harmonic with the frequency of the circuit so that you don't start transmitting radio waves, but this experiment would be a good segue into basic radio transmission and reception and you could even demonstrate primitive AM transmission of Morse code or audio.
ye but what books do i need to read to understand the electrostatics, magnetism, and electromagnetism completely? I dont wanna leave anything to learn, though it ahs complex math great video as always by the way @GreatScott
This is what engineers do! In theory, if you take a wire and wind it, it will work. But this is the real thing which every engineer has to go through to actually make things work.
Love your videos, I am just starting this video, but I clicked it because I am hoping to create a device that is powered by an apple MagSafe charger. Do you think it would be possible to create a receiver circuit that sits between an iphone12 and MagSafe charger and does not interrupt the handshake for charging?
Nice work! 23% power efficiency is a lot more than I would have expected out of this kind of setup.
Thank you!
@@greatscottlab Arre welcome bhai
It is huge jump from 5% to 23%
Absolutely required a tremendous amount of work
Salute to great scott
And New great scott intro is nice
Much appreciated!
Great video. I'm amazed at the level of mathematical theory used in your videos. And how easily you manage it. You're one of the few you-tubers that excel at both theory and common practice. It confuses me, just sitting here watching you . But I do enjoy what you do, it's very educational 😉
Thanks for the feedback :-)
Bro, I need pen and paper to make heads or tails of it, and even then I gotta double check everything. The editing makes it look easy, but it's approachable if you give yourself time to erase things and shuffle them around a couple times. Then it should "click" in your head and feel awesome, especially if you can see picture of it on an oscilloscope and touch the knobs yourself. You can do it!
@GreatScott! - My research on this topic indicates that you can greatly extend the power transfer distance by interposing PASSIVE COILS (NX) with the same resonant frequency _near or in between_ the transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX). In fact, one paper on the subject said that the power transfer Coupling Efficiency (CE) improves as the *square* of the number N of coils. (This strikes me as being very analogous to the case with a Phased Array improving as the number of elements squared.)
For Inductively Coupled Coils, the equation for *ideal* Coupling Efficiency would be like CE = 1 - (1/N^2). Thus for just 1 coil, CE = 0 (you can't transfer power at all if there is just one coil), while for N=2, CE = 0.75, for N=3, CE = 0.89, for N=4, CE = 0.9375, for N=5, CE = 0.96, etc. That equation indicates that with an infinite number of coils, Coupling Efficiency would be perfect, 1.0, unity.
In reality, those numbers should be multiplied by your efficiency with your basic 2 coils, TX and RX, immediately adjacent to each other. The paper also spoke of creating a whole _mesh network_ of the passive coils, for very high CE anywhere within a whole house. I would love to see if you can reproduce those results, GreatScott... or anyone else!
lets appreciate the fact that he did all this to make a video for us!
My pleasure :-) It is awesome to have this job where I can freely experiment and share it with others ;-)
I never get bored while watching your videos on UA-cam and pictures on Instagram. It always makes my day better... ❤️
Awesome :-)
@@greatscottlab please also make 4G and 5G antenna since it's very demand it today due to online learning 🤔 👌 👍
Thank you for this video GreatScott, lots of information presented in an easy to handle way!
Glad it was helpful!
Hi,
will you try adding ferrite tiles on the back of the coil to redirect the B field to the front, like induction cooktop are made ?
Maybe next time ;-)
Would that work like a satellite dish for directing the signal better then using one on the receiver to increase reception?
Have you tried the experiment with a metal backing plate (pizza Pan?) behind the transmitting coil? Currently the energy is being transmitted in all directions from the coil. If you use a metal plate behind it you should have more energy directed to the receiving coil. This would be even more effective if the backing plate had a rim around it that would go around the circumference of the coil. Perhaps you could do a video trying different shapes of metal backing plate: flat, bowl shaped, parabolic, etc, or even tin foil shaped around the back 270 degrees of the coil with only the front side of the coil exposed in the intended direction of transmission.
I like those ideas. It is on my to do list :-)
I would have expected the induced currents in a backing plate would increase the losses, as the plate represents a shorted turn.
I have often wondered how contactless mobile phone charges manage to avoid such losses in the phone PCB copper earth plane.
Such coils are always operated in a resonant configuration, but at such low frequencies that the distance to the ground plane cannot be significant in terms of wavelength.
Ideally a parabolic dish on both sides would be the most efficient back reflector and you can get ones of about the size of the coils being used here at a junkyard by looking for an old satellite TV dish, but a backing plate would still makke a huge difference.
@@greatscottlab Did you took in consideration impedance of free air space? Another question what if coil is in conical spiral shape? And why u dont try to use one size for transmitter and another size for receiver ?
Regarding metal plate google "Investigation of the influence of a large steel plate on the magnetic field distribution of a magnetic proximity detection system". There are some tests done already.
@@nigeljohnson9820 The reflector does not have a matched impedance to the coil transmitter or receiver since you ground it with as low of a resistance as possible. If the impedance of two oscillating circuits is not of the same value, the power is reflected away from the receiving end based on the difference in impedance between the two circuits. The circuits also have to have similar inherent resonant frequencies or share one or more harmonic frequencies with each other or the power bounces off of the interface between the circuits.
Great video, as always, and really glad that Elektor are sponsoring you as they're much more relevant to electronics hobbyists than (not round) Space or the VPN companies that seem to sponsor a lot of stuff on UA-cam...
Yep. I am happy to have them as sponsors. I try to stay away from VPNs and such for this particular reason that is has not much to do with electronics.
@@greatscottlab a true man of culture 👌
Shocked, that Elektor Magazine is still around. It faded from my orbit just as 'Wireless World' had done similarly before it. Both, during 50 my years of interest.
Thought that hobby electronics had miniaturised into surface-mount oblivion. Your experiments demonstrating mind-blowing modern home lab equipment - so refreshing. Thanks.
The real difficulty of the Q measurement is that it is the tangent of the phase angle. Because tangent function diverges at 90 degrees and you are measuring phase angles close to that value, you'll need to measure the phase angle very precisely, because even a small error in the angle will result in a big difference in the Q calculation.
Love the animated intro - I wish there was a mashup with Take On Me 🙂
Great quality
+Great content
+Great proyects
+Great channel
= Great Scott
Thanks mate :-)
Excellently comprehensive coverage of the topic !! No way did they get into anything near that level of information detail when I went to Electrical Engineering school !! THANKS !! ;)
Probably because EE school teachers were taught by the book and then taught by the book, rather than from personal experience and experimentation.
You are the great book that I'm never lazy to read.
And you give great motivation for lore
Happy to hear that!
Fantastic, dude! Really amazing work! 😃
It's really interesting how physical differences in the used wire changes things!
Anyway, stay safe and creative there! 🖖😊
Really good video Scott! It worth the time I wake to 11PM right now ;)
Thanks for watching :-)
Could adding a "core" between the windings shape the field and increase coupling? How else could you do directed power transfer / beam forming? What about the power at a multiple of the wavelength at a different node? Could you tap more power from the other side, reflected about the field symmetry line?
All this as was shown is happening in the Near Field of the coils, at a distance much less than ONE wavelength, so the usual assumptions about multiple wavelengths do not apply.
@@YodaWhat thank you!
Man your videos are always a masterpiece 👏. Thank you for this beautiful showcase of electronics I appreciate it 😃
My pleasure!
@@greatscottlab man thank you 😊
The black and white , pencil stylized is very nice! Okay, I'm going to finish watching ✋
I love the new intro!
Thanks :-)
Great Scott!! What have you done?! ;-) 1.6 Million! You are on your way! Thanks for all the "Great" Videos!! :-)
Thanks for watching :-)
Grate, i really like the power stuff you do. But we are all wondering when you finally finish the spot welder thing.
finally after waiting for so long an amazing video of great Scott, great work
Glad you enjoyed it!
Great video, great sponsor ! Quality all the way !
Much appreciated!
You and your ideas are always great 👍🏻
Thank you so much 😀
9:19 nice whistle!
Congratulations more than 100 comments within 1 hour of you posting the video. This shows that your content was,is and will always be amazing. Keep it up!
If you want to use a higher frequency, reduce the diameter of the coil's windings because that will raise its natural resonance frequency.
Where do you draw the line when he should switch to using antenna designs for best transmission and recieving results eg focused or directed transmitter instead of just air coil transformer
Only Great Scott will take time to investigate something like this on UA-cam.
As a fellow electronics enthusiast i really appreciate your builds and videos.
Thanks for the feedback :-)
Thank you very much
Best regards from qatar 🇶🇦
It was very useful video.
Great as ever, looking forward to more of these kinds of videos
Glad to hear it!
0:28 I see he knows about unforeseen consequences
Now that's a fancy intro I absolutely love it.
Very helpful video. I liked it
Change thickness and length
Thickness increases and length decreases
Make one big and other small
What about using a conductive material that has high Q at high frequencies? Are there any such conductive materials available?
Did you make a video about how semiconductors are made ??
Not in big detail since this channel is more about applied electrical engineering.
Loving the New Intro😀😀
Sir I love your videos you are so intelligent and I hope you will be a great scientist one day 👍
Bedankt
Danke für die Unterstützung :-)
Tesla would be proud!!Only one science in physics and chemistry, it is called ELECTRICAL SCIENCE!!Keep up the good work!!!Never stop experimenting!!!
New intro is on point.
Amazing and satisfying new intro man. Really like it. I liked your previous one as well, but this one is clean and quick and does the job. Like everything you create, really big fan bro and thanks for teaching us so much and abundantly about so many things
Thank you very much Scott for your Videos, I really do learn very much! Weiter machen :)
I got lost at the math equation at 2:30
🤯
Thanks for the video on Inductors and charging!
I am having a "debate" with some of my EE textbooks... which state that there is a "Back EMF" when charging an Inductor and a "Back EMF" when current is suddenly stopped. I don't have the proper equipment to do the testing but when I tried to look at this using an oscilloscope across the inductor I was not able to see any measurable "back emf" on the inductor when it was charging, but. there was a voltage drop.
Perhaps I am doing this wrong?
The other thing I don't understand is when I "suddenly cut the power" they call the electricity coming from the Inductor a "Back EMF", but in my testing, the voltage from the Inductor was the same as the source polarity.
Perhaps I am doing something wrong?
❤❤❤ Try wireless Dipole Antenna instead of a circular coil. Saw videos from another channel. Dipole antenna is no affected by distance 😊😊😊😊. Please try on next video😢😢😢❤❤❤❤❤
I like your new intro. Didn't hate the old one. Just acknowledging the new one. 😲
killing it as always sir thank you so much!!!!
Thanks :-)
Great vid ! I love it when you do that kind of deeper research, super super interesting. Keep it up !
Thanks, will do!
Although I don't understand it, such great content, just wish your videos were a bit longer honestly, I hear how YT tells creators to keep them short, well I don't think those of us that really enjoy this kind of content care much for shot videos, pack in the details!!! Thanks sir!
Now that looks like a nice LCR meter. Probably costs a pretty penny.
Edit: yep. Phew. I mean, it's less than I expected, if I had a good use for it, then it wouldn't be too bad.
Not the cheapest stuff. But very useful :-)
Love the new intro!
Thanks for all your inspirational vids! Now you are at the coil section anyway, maybe it is an interesting project to create an Axial Flow Generator? That would be awesome!
More videos like this please. This kind of videos that You discover some scientific stuff
Could you post schematics. I would like to do the numbers. Are you sure it was resonantly tuned? Remember even a led resistance could change the frequency.. What frequency are you using?
Woah love the new intro
The was very good video in youtube by russian scientists by this technology. He used square shape. Thx for your technic and video. Great! ;)
Thanl you for this video
But what are the details for your last wire that you used?
The diameter, number of turns ....
I might be too low on caffeine, but I didn't notice any method of impedance matching the load to the receive coil? Seems like measuring the short circuit current of the receive coil would actually decrease the current, lowering the magnetic field, and the breaking down the coupling of the coils. Maybe I didn't follow it exactly.
You should try some more neatly wound coils to reduce the parasitic inductance and increase Q, styles to try include solenoid, pancake, spider, and basket weave.
Did you try to use some ferrite material inside and outside of your 2 coils ? Could they concentrate more of the magnetic field and increase efficiency ?
Have you tried a flat spiral coil? That will give you a more cone-shaped EM field instead of the double-hump shaped field emitted by the simple coil.
Can we try to have compensation circuit for both sides?
Or maybe we can try capacitive wireless power transfer next time! My undergraduate thesis is about CPT, and I found that theoretically we can reach about 60%+ at 1MHz frequency at large distances using a double-sided LC compensation circuit .
I did strip out an old anti shoplifting system, which used as coils long lengths of 20mm by 2mm thick aluminium strip, wound into large coils, with an insulating tape layer on the one side of the coil. Self supporting in the case, and the wide strip made for very low loss, though of course the higher capacitance made the self resonant frequency lower. However, seeing as it ran at audio frequencies for the most part, and at around 50W in the transmit coils, this was not too much of a problem. You could simply use a thick self adhesive foam tape on the one side, instead of the thin polyamide they used, and get a much better coil performance. Also wind the coil with a small offset per winding, so they do not fully overlap, so as to have a zig zag strip coil.
Is there any data (done by experts or enthousiast) to compare it ? Like what is the more efficient wireless power coil possible, and how exactly ?
I'm also thinking that putting a sort of bowl or satellite dish better emitter/receiver could improve a bit more the efficiency !
Wouldn’t something like an unidirectional antenna transmit energy even more efficiently ?
Thanks for uploading great content.
It's my pleasure
I always thought that the inductance is a measure specific to a coil and not varies with frequency. I also used to calculate it with its physical dimensions (length, diameter), number of turns and core permeability.
It is new for me that L is different at various frequencies.
XL on the other hand (impedance) is related to the frequency.
What am I missing?
What are your thoughts on Helium mining?
Great video btw
Never heard of it....
Great work so far. I’ll bet that flat coils with more surface area would be more efficient. 🤔
With all this experience in winding and testing coil designs, maybe you could review and develop a metal detector design.
I bought a bunch of pre-made wireless leds and have used several in my action figures as weapons lights or a scale flashlight and in flame effects to illuminate them but i need a much better coil to get some usable range.
There is a winding method for coils often referred to as "fast coil" or basket coil which basically tries to eliminate the parallel strands of wire as much as possible by having them cross at an angle as they are wound on a flat circular form. (2d donut)
Is this type of coil you speak of like a spider coil used for radio? (searching for basket and fast coil is problematic)
Would a second receiver influence the amount of energy the first one gets?
Perfect video, as always :) insightful knowledge
Professor Marin Soljacic
of MIT proposed strongly coupled magnetic resonance (SCMR), and they were able to transfer 60 watts
wirelessly with ~40% efficiency over distances in excess of 2 meters. Can you show us!??!?!?!
If I had to guess just spacing the windings into a cylindrical helix about 1 cm between the turns will ramp up the srf? Analogous to a Tesla coil primary which is a pancake or a spaced out helix.
Can you please provide detailed information on how you stretched the electron beam horizontally? (Your previous video on turning CRT TV into a crude oscilloscope)
Starship coils are the best configuration for wireless transmission especially if they are identical resistance
Is this RF litz wire with individually isolated thin wires?
Hope this helps me with my wireless project
From my experiments the larger the coil diameter the larger the distance you can go. I made 2 coils 6ft around and got a much larger distance apart. Just something to keep in mind, maybe you could try that as well and see how much larger the distance is. Start with double the size you have and try the same experiments.
Would there be a legality problem this, as you are effectively running a radio transmitter?
The 3 fundamental, passive components (Resistor, Capacitor, Inductors), can be "built" using wire as the building block (no other component is needed) You can also build logic blocks with only wire as well. Which means wire is by far, the most versatile component, if you are creative enough!
You can make logic with wire?? I only know about mag amps those have a core. Or maybe something using thermal nonlinear properties?
Relays that are based on attraction between two coils?
I like the new intro
Hi, ich habe eine Frage ich habe ein FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER benutzt um 215vDC zu bekommen und ich wollte fragen ob ich 215vDC an einer Glühbirne benutzen kann und was ich dabei achten muss
Do transformers work on the same principle? Two coils in close proximity of each other?
what if you use a magnet in the coils? does it change anything ?
Are you going to look at impendence matching with air for both of the circuits next? Also, I assume that the shape of the coils that you are using takes into account not having a matching harmonic with the frequency of the circuit so that you don't start transmitting radio waves, but this experiment would be a good segue into basic radio transmission and reception and you could even demonstrate primitive AM transmission of Morse code or audio.
L=y(L=c/f) so you can calculate distance in HZ/m
IF you use 0.6mm² wire is 100spin = 15hz .. So 6.6spin = 1hz
Amazing channel!!
can you please do a review of that elecktor lcr meter? it looks very intriguing.
I don't make such reviews. Sorry. But the LCR Meter works well :-)
hey thanks for your interest, we did a short review on our channel if you are interested: ua-cam.com/video/fuZy63KZPy4/v-deo.html
ye but what books do i need to read to understand the electrostatics, magnetism, and electromagnetism completely?
I dont wanna leave anything to learn, though it ahs complex math
great video as always by the way
@GreatScott
What about frequency 10 to 30 GHz 😅 and how I can get this range of frequency plz
This is what engineers do! In theory, if you take a wire and wind it, it will work. But this is the real thing which every engineer has to go through to actually make things work.
Love your videos, I am just starting this video, but I clicked it because I am hoping to create a device that is powered by an apple MagSafe charger. Do you think it would be possible to create a receiver circuit that sits between an iphone12 and MagSafe charger and does not interrupt the handshake for charging?
Very nice, I like the information presented in the video (:
Glad to hear!