Neurophenomenology implies indirect realism. If we say that conscious experience is correlated with the brain's activity, then we are also implicitly suggesting that the world of our conscious experience is not the authentic external world but a perceptual model rendered by the neurons, some sort of interface with adaptive design.
I finish watching this video and I cannot memorize all the details. What I understand in my personal perspective is that I have a causal power why I watch this video and if I narrates all the details we can get a conclusion that is a mechanical system and no free will. Right?
Neurophenomenology implies indirect realism. If we say that conscious experience is correlated with the brain's activity, then we are also implicitly suggesting that the world of our conscious experience is not the authentic external world but a perceptual model rendered by the neurons, some sort of interface with adaptive design.
Duhh. There's no difference between perception and hallucination.
I finish watching this video and I cannot memorize all the details. What I understand in my personal perspective is that I have a causal power why I watch this video and if I narrates all the details we can get a conclusion that is a mechanical system and no free will. Right?
Correct. Also you had to make this comment and I had to respond. Acting as if there was any other fact is imagination...
I felt compelled to reply due to not having free will even though I don't have anything to really expound on your comnent.