Back in February, when we objected your use of another one of our videos, you emailed us and said “While we don't technically need permission to use short excerpts in review, if you feel that strongly about it, we don't object to not using your footage as 100s of other channels do ask us to be featured.” To which we told you that we don’t want to ever be a part of your videos ever again. We will reiterate it here: please stop taking our footage. While you argue that what you do isn’t unethical, we’ll argue otherwise. The video we made for the Bibimbap clip you used cost a lot of money for us to make. We drove for hours to get to that location. We brought our staff with us, who we all paid to come, to help film and edit this video. We put a lot of energy into it, and a lot of personal expense, and it’s our video. Our video. Not yours. And we don’t want you to use it. We don’t like what you do here. We don’t like this channel. And we should be able to say we don’t want any associations with this channel at all. This video you made doesn’t promote our channel. You’re not talking about us, our message, our video style. You’re not talking about the shot we used. You’re not talking about who we are as people, about why we make videos. You just took our video to use as supplementary footage for your own message. You’re treating us as stock footage. But if you want to use stock footage, then pay for it. Go to shutterstock and buy the videos you want to use. If not, then pay creators what they deserve for the work they put in. Stop taking their work and monetizing off of it. Stop threatening legal action if we try to protect our work. When other companies want to license our footage, they offer to pay us for our work. And when other companies approach us to license our footage, we can say yes or no, if we want to be part of their video, if we want to be associated with their channel. And then they won’t use our video if we don’t let them. We’ll say this to you again: we do not want to be part of your videos. Please stop taking our footage.
+Simon and Martina Whether you believe this or not, we never got any response to the email we sent back in Feb in addition to the takedown counter-notification (re: "To which we told you that we don’t want to ever be a part of your videos ever again"). I believe you if you say you sent it (unless it's sitting in your Draft folder) but I presume it went into our spam/deleted folders. We figured you reluctantly agreed with our position and/our you saw the benefit. Either way, we do license considerable stock footage, but yes, we also rely on Fair Use (we generally mix stock with channels as it gives a better overall tone to the video). That said, you don't get to set the rules wrt Fair Use, so yes, so long as our videos are Transformative and pass (so to speak) a "weighted average" of the Four Tests of Fair Use, we are within our rights to do so. You may not like to hear that, but that is your problem, not ours. Fair use isn't simply about promoting or reviewing (though it encompasses those things, of course), so rest assured the way we used the video would be Transformative (i.e. a mashup blends various sources and doesn't review anything, but that is transformative). What other companies do is moot as each entity sets its own Copyright risk threshold. Believe me, whether or not you like our channel or not is moot; in fact, Fair Use exists specifically to prevent people from limiting who can create what content. This is absolutely a matter of freedom of speech and expression and the fact that you think this is about your driving hours to film cooking recipes and eating food shows that, with all due respect, you need to get over yourself (and sure, you think the same about what I'm saying; I see both sides even though legally we are right and you know it). That said, YES, we also add many sources on our "black lists" as a matter of professional courtesy. To keep repeating: "[s]top threatening legal action if we try to protect our work" is bordering on defamation and if you continue to misrepresent what we said then we will consider that option (for defamation, not copyright). All I did was i) explain Fair Use which you clearly lack an understanding of and ii) mention that until you educated yourself on the matter, you should not issue takedown's because yes, there have been precedents to that end. But, for the last time, one does not need your permission so long as it's used within the parameters, which it is. That said, out of courtesy we will not use your content in the future. Our entire position herein is based on not receiving a response to our reply (I can gladly send you a screen grab of the email thread showing only the emails we sent you, with no replies received). In any case, I hope this resolves the matter.
@@WatchMojoyou guys are highly unprofessional. I’ve been watching you guys for over 10 years loved every bit of content but that reply was just downright condescending and passive aggressive. Doesn’t matter whether you are right within legal boundaries. Y’all are just shitty people lol. Just rub their nose in it why don’t you? Better off just not saying a fucking word. Clearly see you guys aren’t in it for the best intentions if that is how you respond to someone just trying to protect what they created.
I think it said in the intro that soups won't be included. This is likely why there was no mention of ramen, either. If it did include soups, though, I'd expect to see Pho in it, too.
+chongtak Shouldn't you have said all non native speakers of the country. Do you really think only North Americans can't pronounce names of Asian foods? Thai people can't pronounce Japanese names. Japanese aren't good at pronouncing Indian names and so on. Your comment sounds like you think only NA have this problem.
shinmusashi44 I am Cantonese born in Vietnam, raised there and partly in France I have studied Japanese at the university in ICU (Tokyo) for five years I have since lived seven years in Thailand. I can compare the way all those Asian people pronounce oher Asian food names it's not always perfect but sometimes it is. Moreover I havent said EVERYBODY from North America, I have mentionned a North American accent, didn't I? There is a difference. I know some Canadians (white) speaking Vietnamese almost perfectlybut they are extremely rare. My point was HER pronounciation with a North American accent, she is not even able to pronounce simple vowels correctly, you get my point now? However I pointed it with a touch of humour which obviously you didn't get as well.
"Sushi with or without rice" Sushi without rice doesn't exist. You can make sushi with any kind of fish, meat, vegetables or anything else, but if it doesn't include vinegared rice, it's not sushi.
+kurahadol3 Yeah. When I came to thailand and I say the "american" khao pad, it looks nothing like american fried rice. In american we eat the same type of fried rice everyone else does lol.
If you ike Japanese soups or stews, try Chanko Nabe. A stable of Sumo diets, its a very high protein meal with chicken, mini meatballs, tofu, sprouts, Udon Noodles, and seaweed in a broth made up of chicken or vegetable stock, soy sauce, mirin, and sake.
Asian American. so only dishes that are brought over to the Americas and are popular here and or dishes invented in America that use Asian inspired flare.
I have watch several videos about "Americanized Chinese Foods" & I observed that the majority of dishes are popular & widely eaten here in the Philippines in restaurants, in family meals & special occasions.
I was so glad no one mentioned 'Filipino food'. It's so gross. Sure Filipinos are excellent at smiling, signing Happy Birthday, and making noise, but that's pretty much it
I came home a little drunk, found this video, decided to make sandwiches before watching it, came up with this: Buns cut in half, toasted the inner sides, let to cool. Spread on both sides: cream cheese with homemade pickled chilli peppers (toasted off, or smoked first), olive oil and garlic. Meat: smoked ham (some countries would consider it bacon). Relish: homemade pickled cabbage, carrot and horseradish (a take on sauerkraut). :D
+Jon Tillas The title is American Asian foods. Not specifically East Asian food. Some of these foods are just that - American Asian foods that you cannot actually find in Asia.
WatchMojo.com not really legal or not it’s in poor taste. Lawyer up the blood suckers have no morals either you’ll be in good company. Turning profit from someone else’s sweat.
+I ship you not Now that's funny... and we always appreciate a sense of humor. Maybe we'll do that after we tackle "Top 10 UA-camrs who think the laws that apply to ALL other content producers should not apply to them" :) - Look, we explained ourselves countless of times. If people want don't want to understand facts and hear both sides, we can't help them! We've been in business for 10 years, have partnerships with traditional & new media companies, with 11M+ fans/supporters on UA-cam alone, but I guess while many rooted for us on the way up, it normal to see some people's jealousy and envy cloud their judgment. It's all good. I'm just glad that when we were small & unknown, we didn't manifest such traits. To each their own.
This channel make so many referencing mistakes: Vietnam and Thailand is not "East Asia". Fried Rice is not "a delicacy" Intentionally make stupid mistake just to encourage a few responses, lame.
How about stop stealing people's footage when they specifically said you couldn't use it? Simon and Martina work extremely hard to produce their videos, and your channel is a disgrace if you can't find footage authentically.
Look, you might be in the legal right, but taking footage without permission is still a dick move. Just because you guys are basically the kings of "cut, paste, hey look what I made!" doesn't mean you get to steal whatever you want.
+WatchMojo.com I read the general comment. You're in the LEGAL right, that's already established, but just because it's legal doesn't make it ok. Simon and Martina asked you not to use their footage, but you go ahead and do it again. That's why it's a dick move. They actually filmed the footage, you know, did actual work that cost money and used people to set it up. As they've said in their own comment, they don't want their property being used as stock footage. You can claim hypocrisy and defamation, but the fact remains that you could've (obviously) chosen any other Asian cooking channel out there, but instead you chose to use a channel that expressed disagreement with you in the past. That's an antagonistic move regardless of legal standing, like saying, "Hey screw you, we do what we want! FAIR USE!" Well, of course people are going to call you out on a bullying move like that. Why is it so hard for you to respect their wishes?
+From Kentucky to Tokyo as mentioned in another comment, we really didn't get their reply to our reply, and assumed they reluctantly agreed and/or eventually saw the benefit. On our end, case closed.
+WatchMojo.com I get it, Fair use and all that, it's in legal terms, but who does that? Who, when asking for permission and supposedly "gets no response", uses the footage anyways? That's not how it's done, if you're going to ask at all and try to be respectful you then wait to be given permission, and if you get no response at all, then plain and simple you don't use it. It's like asking an artist to use their artwork and then it get's used anyways before any response is given, even if it might be a no (or no response), saying "ohey look it's good promotion for you ahahaha!" That shit's just not right. Like I said, I get it, as far as videos go it's in your legal rights (according to you - I haven't done proper research myself I must admit), but still a hella dick move. Why bother asking in the first place if you're just going to assume everyone's gonna be okay with it, and then proceed to go ahead with it if there's no response? To me it makes asking a moot point. And don't come back once again with "LEGAL USE SO SHHHH", just because it's legal doesn't make it less shitty looking on your part, and just because they "supposedly" (with quotations since there's no way for me to personally know if they did or not since I'm neither party) didn't respond also doesn't make y'all any more in the right. We can still dislike y'all for doing it and express our opinions rightly so, no? Free speech, amIright? Or wait, can we not share such feelings since it's defamation? I'd genuinely like to know...
I want to live in a world where people on mega channels don't steal content from the smaller channels in order to get more likes and subs. I want to live in a world where Fair Use isn't an excuse to use whatever footage you stumbled upon on the internet, which the original creators don't want to find used on said other channels. Unfortunately, we're not there yet.
+From Kentucky to Tokyo And I want to live in a world where people actually research facts before they comment (not talking about you, in general) & hear both sides of a debate/discussion before making accusations. Unfortunately, we're not there yet.
+์Noobs Gamer Yes, I don't think it's actually a Thai dish, but it's just something that was "inspired" by Thai cuisine. For some reason, in America, whenever we try to make food that is supposed to be Thai-style, peanuts often get included just because the most popular Thai dish in the US (Pad Thai) is usually served with peanuts. It's weird, especially since Pad Grapao seems to be much more popular in Thailand than Pad Thai (& I would say Pad Grapao is a better tasting dish as well), but most people outside of Thailand don't seem to know about it.
The Great Gaming Dude You could be right, but I wonder why they wouldn't just call it that instead, especially since peanuts aren't a central ingredient in making it (they're not even used in many recipes for penang curry).
I only saw the comments now, otherwise I would have answered immediately. I will post this general comment and then reply to Simon and Martina below, as well. [Added later to reflect them saying that they did indeed reply to us: we never received their reply to our formal response after the first clip in February 2016. I give them the benefit of the doubt that they did indeed send an email, but I can show you the email thread showing only emails from us to them and nothing back. Had we received it, without admitting any wrongdoing, we would have not used footage in a second clip out of courtesy. This second clip was actually researched and completed in Dec 2015 but published in April 2016. So not having heard back from them, we didn't go back to flag any further use as 100% of people who receive our responses finally understand how Fair Use works and/or realize the promo benefit.] With regards to Copyright in general, since so many of the critics are clearly so misinformed: I realize that given the ability to comment online, people are quick to say something even though they ought to research the subject and hear both sides. Even though given how we use third-party footage, indeed we don't need to ask permission, originally when we started doing so we would ask. By and large, everyone welcomed it as promotion and as we grew in output, given tight turnaround times, we stopped asking for permission simply because, and I say this respectfully, indeed permission is not required via the Fair Use exemptions provided under Copyright Law. I find it very hypocritical for some to pile on and accuse us of one thing or another when those same people shout #WTFU otherwise. Are those keyboard warriors suggesting that Fair Use should only apply to traditional media companies like movie studios, record labels, video game publishers but not UA-cam producers? Do all channels we feature welcome and approve of this? No, I will not lie. But that is a reflection of their lack of understanding of copyright law or hypocrisy; for example, the odd Let's Play channel may object to, but those are the same channels that themselves feature third-party footage from video game publishers... yet turn around and cry foul when we feature short portions of their content in a Transformative review. Now that all said, with regards to Simon and Martina, we did receive a takedown some ago and we issued a counter-notification in the same way we would do so with a traditional media company. We took the time to respectfully outline Fair Use, explain that we view it as promotional and beneficial, and highlighted that they ought to be careful because indeed, in these days, the tide is shifting increasingly in favor of Fair Use and if (upon being informed of our rights via Fair Use) they disagreed, they could simply provide us with cases and precedents supporting their argument. They failed to do so. Why? Because they probably don't understand or like the law. Moreover, I explained in fairly diplomatic and friendly terms (granted tone gets lost in email) that if they issue a takedown against a given channel, some channels would not solely issue a counter-notification but also sue them for actual damages (example Lenz vs Universal Records, Michelle Phan versus Kaskade, and many other cases). We never threatened them of anything, however; if anything, we gave them a clear line of communication to myself to voice their disagreement or discontent, which legally we don't even need to do. It was the polite and fair thing to do. They chose not to reply, but have now decided to go online and defame us. That upsets me and makes me very angry. And if we find them misrepresenting our position and attacking our reputation, then yes, they have crossed the line (are we suggesting in any way that we will pursue them for defamation? No. But is what they are doing harmful to our reputation? Yes, of course it is... hence why I am explaining all of this in very transparent terms to explain that what we do is not illegal or unethical either. But having some new media producers criticize "old media" and/or UA-cam for not doing more to recognize and respect Fair Use but then turn around and claim that Fair Use shall not apply to them is plain hypocritical. Lastly, we have worked behind the scenes to help so many channels tackle unfair and excessive takedowns while encouraging them to respect the spirit of the law moreso than simply the letter of the law. We have also worked behind the scenes with UA-cam since 2008-ish to push for many of the positive changes over the years. Is the system perfect? No. But we believe that we are respectful of rights holders both "old" and "new" and fully respect the law, so having anyone accuse us otherwise publicly when we reached out to them privately is simply unfair and uncalled for. While some may chalk this up to jealousy and envy, I think it's a lack of understanding of the law. But if you have an issue, my door/email inbox is always open. AK
Hypocritical? They've stated before that they don't want to be associated with you and this should be respected not matter what type of media it is. This is just giving you a bad image, worse than what it already was.
+WatchMojo.com I know I'm the one who brought this particular video to EYK's attention...I apologize. I just wanted to know if they were aware because of their previous comment on that other video. I'm reading all these hate comments and would say that they're totally not necessary. I honestly don't know much about copyright issues and stuff relating to that for UA-cam, but I still really love you guys and I enjoy all your videos and will continue watching :D I also really love Simon and Martina and will enjoy the best of both worlds.
Although using their videos may be legal, it is immoral. They do not want you to use their videos, but you continue to, even though you can just go ask someone else who is willing to allow you to use their videos. By using their videos against their will, it is almost as if you are rubbing the fact that you can in their faces. If you are trying to make money using other people's videos, you can at least get consent from the creator.
Simon and Martina (eatyourkimchi) did NOT give you permission to use their footage in this video. And they expressly asked you not to use their videos. Poor show, WatchMojo.
You guys are horrible. How inhuman can you be, how demoralizing and disrespectfully shameless, to ask if you can use footage, be told NO, and do it ANYWAYS!? And not only that, you threatened legal action when they defended themselves against your theft. Are you drunk off your own Koolaid or something? That isn't what decent people do to other people!
It is a shame that soups were not included in this list. Pho is a daily staple of the Vietnamese, Cambodian and the Lao. It is also becoming very popular in the United States. The thing that makes it popular is the fresh flavor and the versatility of ingredients, just like the Banh mi. Also, I know curry chicken is probably considered an Indian dish, but it is also served in Vietnamese and Thai restaurants.
I used to love orange chicken or honey walnut chicken, but now I mostly only do a small dish of egg drop soup and a couple pieces of sushi. Also LOOOOOOOOVE those sesame bald with the Sweet bean paste.
For Chinese, Of course, the General Tso Chicken with white rice and a shrimp egg roll. Or, the Beef Egg Foo Young with white rice and a shrimp egg roll. For Japanese, The Peanut ChickenTeriyaki with the salad splashed in Balasmic Vinegrette and a shot of hot sake!
Next up: "Top 10 Popular Indonesian-European Foods served in Bolivian restaurants in Uganda"
😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
Top 10 Eurasian foods served in Antarctica
Top ten top ten list
Top 10 exiles to Uzbekistan
yeah dude
Back in February, when we objected your use of another one of our videos, you emailed us and said “While we don't technically need permission to use short excerpts in review, if you feel that strongly about it, we don't object to not using your footage as 100s of other channels do ask us to be featured.” To which we told you that we don’t want to ever be a part of your videos ever again. We will reiterate it here: please stop taking our footage.
While you argue that what you do isn’t unethical, we’ll argue otherwise. The video we made for the Bibimbap clip you used cost a lot of money for us to make. We drove for hours to get to that location. We brought our staff with us, who we all paid to come, to help film and edit this video. We put a lot of energy into it, and a lot of personal expense, and it’s our video. Our video. Not yours. And we don’t want you to use it. We don’t like what you do here. We don’t like this channel. And we should be able to say we don’t want any associations with this channel at all.
This video you made doesn’t promote our channel. You’re not talking about us, our message, our video style. You’re not talking about the shot we used. You’re not talking about who we are as people, about why we make videos. You just took our video to use as supplementary footage for your own message. You’re treating us as stock footage.
But if you want to use stock footage, then pay for it. Go to shutterstock and buy the videos you want to use. If not, then pay creators what they deserve for the work they put in. Stop taking their work and monetizing off of it. Stop threatening legal action if we try to protect our work.
When other companies want to license our footage, they offer to pay us for our work. And when other companies approach us to license our footage, we can say yes or no, if we want to be part of their video, if we want to be associated with their channel. And then they won’t use our video if we don’t let them.
We’ll say this to you again: we do not want to be part of your videos. Please stop taking our footage.
+Simon and Martina Whether you believe this or not, we never got any response to the email we sent back in Feb in addition to the takedown counter-notification (re: "To which we told you that we don’t want to ever be a part of your videos ever again"). I believe you if you say you sent it (unless it's sitting in your Draft folder) but I presume it went into our spam/deleted folders. We figured you reluctantly agreed with our position and/our you saw the benefit. Either way, we do license considerable stock footage, but yes, we also rely on Fair Use (we generally mix stock with channels as it gives a better overall tone to the video). That said, you don't get to set the rules wrt Fair Use, so yes, so long as our videos are Transformative and pass (so to speak) a "weighted average" of the Four Tests of Fair Use, we are within our rights to do so. You may not like to hear that, but that is your problem, not ours. Fair use isn't simply about promoting or reviewing (though it encompasses those things, of course), so rest assured the way we used the video would be Transformative (i.e. a mashup blends various sources and doesn't review anything, but that is transformative). What other companies do is moot as each entity sets its own Copyright risk threshold. Believe me, whether or not you like our channel or not is moot; in fact, Fair Use exists specifically to prevent people from limiting who can create what content. This is absolutely a matter of freedom of speech and expression and the fact that you think this is about your driving hours to film cooking recipes and eating food shows that, with all due respect, you need to get over yourself (and sure, you think the same about what I'm saying; I see both sides even though legally we are right and you know it). That said, YES, we also add many sources on our "black lists" as a matter of professional courtesy. To keep repeating: "[s]top threatening legal action if we try to protect our work" is bordering on defamation and if you continue to misrepresent what we said then we will consider that option (for defamation, not copyright). All I did was i) explain Fair Use which you clearly lack an understanding of and ii) mention that until you educated yourself on the matter, you should not issue takedown's because yes, there have been precedents to that end. But, for the last time, one does not need your permission so long as it's used within the parameters, which it is. That said, out of courtesy we will not use your content in the future. Our entire position herein is based on not receiving a response to our reply (I can gladly send you a screen grab of the email thread showing only the emails we sent you, with no replies received). In any case, I hope this resolves the matter.
You come on here publicly defaming Watchmojo who did nothing illegal. If I was Watchmojo I would sue you ass. Please learn about copyright laws
WatchMojo.com LOL I bet it was Peter who wrote this
@@chris2kgreat well, why did they have to use other channel's videos? can't they make their own?!
@@WatchMojoyou guys are highly unprofessional. I’ve been watching you guys for over 10 years loved every bit of content but that reply was just downright condescending and passive aggressive. Doesn’t matter whether you are right within legal boundaries. Y’all are just shitty people lol. Just rub their nose in it why don’t you? Better off just not saying a fucking word. Clearly see you guys aren’t in it for the best intentions if that is how you respond to someone just trying to protect what they created.
Where is Pho? Not even in honorable mentions?
I think it said in the intro that soups won't be included. This is likely why there was no mention of ramen, either. If it did include soups, though, I'd expect to see Pho in it, too.
Omg yes
+Bob Bob Im not even Viet but im like wait where is pho???
You guys are sure quick to dismiss what Hateke Kyun said. Note, emphasis on the word "soup".
I know!! its a traditional food in my gamily
Waiting for the Indian Top 10 list..XD
+breakITdown yeah baby
same here
Other Day? I want it today xD
same here
I'm Pakistani, but also waiting :D
Please stop taking our footage.
I second this comment.
third this comment
You should flag them for copyright or something. This is not okay.
you guys should flag them for infringement
+Allie McGee I tried last time, and they threatened legal action, so I had to take down my claim.
it really felt good when she said that indian cuisine deserves its own list! :)
Please stop taking other people's content when they specifically told you not to use it. It's not good for your reputation.
I hope they do more of these vids really enjoyed this and it made me hungry and curious
not cool watch mojo!you need to get permission before using peoples footage!!!
+Terina Choi response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
They actually can. It's call fair use.
I checked your channel you steal others videos two 😂
@@akiowongjkd dude this comments a year old and yes I meant too
Just because you give credit with captions at the bottom of the video does not mean you did not steal footage from others' videos. Not cool.
+AnisDianaNana ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
This is a great list. Twiced cooked pork is one of my favorite as well, but you could make this list the top 100 dishes and you could not go wrong....
Introduction was said to focus on East Asian dishes, yet they included South East Asian dishes.
I'm glad you said "American Asian". I've never seen any of the Chinese dishes in a restaurant in China except for the Peking Duck.
JUSTICE FOR EVERYONE'S FOOTAGE YOU HAVE STOLEN.
They do credit them. Credits are in the lower left corner so maybe you didn't see them
I was expecting Phó to be on this list.
Ikr!!
+Tommy Nguyen Holy pho, they forgot pho!
+Tommy Nguyen I wasn't. The intro said soup would not be counted in this list.
+Tommy Nguyen No soup for you!
+Tommy Nguyen
I think Ramen is more popular and that isn't even on the list.
No sweet and sour chicken? 😢
The video said the list of foods found in East Asia. Thailand and Vietnam are Southeast Asian countries.
Thank you! I was just thinking that
+nOnOy borbun what you said
+nOnOy borbun Southeast is still technically east though.
+crunchips0crust Hahahahaha . So Southeast is technicall south too? Hahahahaha. Your comment is so funny!
RIP Asian dishes pronounced with a North American accent...
hahaha
😂😂😂😂😂😂
+chongtak Shouldn't you have said all non native speakers of the country. Do you really think only North Americans can't pronounce names of Asian foods? Thai people can't pronounce Japanese names. Japanese aren't good at pronouncing Indian names and so on. Your comment sounds like you think only NA have this problem.
+chongtak who the fuck cares
shinmusashi44 I am Cantonese born in Vietnam, raised there and partly in France I have studied Japanese at the university in ICU (Tokyo) for five years I have since lived seven years in Thailand. I can compare the way all those Asian people pronounce oher Asian food names it's not always perfect but sometimes it is. Moreover I havent said EVERYBODY from North America, I have mentionned a North American accent, didn't I? There is a difference. I know some Canadians (white) speaking Vietnamese almost perfectlybut they are extremely rare. My point was HER pronounciation with a North American accent, she is not even able to pronounce simple vowels correctly, you get my point now? However I pointed it with a touch of humour which obviously you didn't get as well.
"Sushi with or without rice"
Sushi without rice doesn't exist. You can make sushi with any kind of fish, meat, vegetables or anything else, but if it doesn't include vinegared rice, it's not sushi.
Great video and my chef's hat is tipped to you!
I would love to see some of your great dish made by you I really love ladies that cook
Orange Chicken
Great list!
Stop taking footage from people who don't give you permission. UA-cam should take this video down!
Damn i'm hungry now
no Pho? ..... Anthony Bourdain favorite food
"Wok with Yan" OMG originally watched it on normal tv. Blast from the past. Damn Im old :(
How about some Okonomiyaki :)
I live in Thailand, there's a menu called "American fried rice" which is I'm 135% sure that Americans have no idea what it is
+kurahadol3 Yeah. When I came to thailand and I say the "american" khao pad, it looks nothing like american fried rice. In american we eat the same type of fried rice everyone else does lol.
the way she said Bibimbap tho..
Man, I love Asian food, especially because I have a Chinese background! I love Peking duck, fried rice, and pad Thai. I especially love sushi.
Wait didn't you take EatYourKimchi's video footage agian???
+Jensey Mathew reply here ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
Now I am hungry for some Chinese food.
Dropped the ball by not including Teriyaki.....
I am Asian American and I am embrace my culture too
Wow I love Asians too especially there way of cooking and hardwork . Hope your one of them
credit or no, you shouldn't use footage without permission
If you ike Japanese soups or stews, try Chanko Nabe. A stable of Sumo diets, its a very high protein meal with chicken, mini meatballs, tofu, sprouts, Udon Noodles, and seaweed in a broth made up of chicken or vegetable stock, soy sauce, mirin, and sake.
I'm having fried rice when watching this.
can't argue with this list. esp the #1 which is still consider one of my top fave for sure.
Sweet and sour chicken is my favorite dish
Just tell me your good when it comes to cooking it . I would love to taste your food .
Surprised Japanese Ramen didn't make the cut😑
No Ramen? No Pho?
The announcer said no soups
No.5 ....I love that one
Puts ASIAN dishes in Title. Video contains only EAST ASIAN dishes. CLICKBAIT!! I cri evritym 😔
Asian American. so only dishes that are brought over to the Americas and are popular here and or dishes invented in America that use Asian inspired flare.
loved to see "yan can cook" on here. I watched that show all the time when I was a kid.
Nice. Using STOLEN FOOTAGE when you did NOT have permission. Word is out.
+TheMusicfan2893 response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
Grow some hair on your wee wee balls and stop complaining
Sushi world wide food everywhere.
I have watch several videos about "Americanized Chinese Foods" & I observed that the majority of dishes are popular & widely eaten here in the Philippines in restaurants, in family meals & special occasions.
I was so glad no one mentioned 'Filipino food'. It's so gross. Sure Filipinos are excellent at smiling, signing Happy Birthday, and making noise, but that's pretty much it
@@thesubgenius1676 😂😂😂😂😂😂
wonderful nice video
you never asked Simon and Martina permission to use their part of the video in your video. just be warned when you get a copyright strike
+Firesworth they did ask, and Simon and martina told them NO!
+PosyGirl72 even worse
+Firesworth response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
My mouth is watering !!!!!!!!
General Tso's chicken is very much an american invented dish. There is a whole documentary about it.
yeah and if you actually watched it, the creator and the original restaurant (which still is in business) are from Taiwan.
I came home a little drunk, found this video, decided to make sandwiches before watching it, came up with this:
Buns cut in half, toasted the inner sides, let to cool.
Spread on both sides: cream cheese with homemade pickled chilli peppers (toasted off, or smoked first), olive oil and garlic.
Meat: smoked ham (some countries would consider it bacon).
Relish: homemade pickled cabbage, carrot and horseradish (a take on sauerkraut).
:D
That actually sounds really good!
Oh, the poor Americans
YES! Beef with broccoli! Yum!
I know😋!
O.k .. I'm HUNGRY 😢
The narrator's korean pronunciation, as a Korean myself, absolutely killed me.
LOL! East Asian food but you included Thai and Viet food. LOL... Ummm... LOL. I can't... I just can't. Hahaha.
+Jon Tillas The title is American Asian foods. Not specifically East Asian food. Some of these foods are just that - American Asian foods that you cannot actually find in Asia.
+singlah she mentioned East Asia in the intro..
Are you stupid Thailand and Vietnam are part of East Asia you idiots zzz
+Lisa lol...SouthEast Asia!
+Lisa check it on Google and take back your words!you can correct someone without calling him/her names!#backfired!
for me it's Shrimp Fried Rice is my all time favorite
I'm early quick make a joke uhhhhh Donald Trump's hair
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Just remove "hair" from that
+Lemondude617 I just started a comment chain didn't i
+Lionel Messi Yes you did
+Connor Kelly k
I love pad Thai, drunken noodles, hot prawn soup, dim sum, yaki Mish, beef with scallion, sashimi, sushi ... geez.... hard choice!!!!
So do you always just use videos without permission? Giving credit doesn't mean the video source gave you permission...
+xxSugarzxx response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
WatchMojo.com not really legal or not it’s in poor taste. Lawyer up the blood suckers have no morals either you’ll be in good company. Turning profit from someone else’s sweat.
orange chicken?! it's simplicity and popularity makes it a must
Do next "Top 10 UA-camrs we steal footage off"
+I ship you not Now that's funny... and we always appreciate a sense of humor. Maybe we'll do that after we tackle "Top 10 UA-camrs who think the laws that apply to ALL other content producers should not apply to them" :) - Look, we explained ourselves countless of times. If people want don't want to understand facts and hear both sides, we can't help them! We've been in business for 10 years, have partnerships with traditional & new media companies, with 11M+ fans/supporters on UA-cam alone, but I guess while many rooted for us on the way up, it normal to see some people's jealousy and envy cloud their judgment. It's all good. I'm just glad that when we were small & unknown, we didn't manifest such traits. To each their own.
Hey watch mojo nice shirt!!!
glad they didn't include dog or cat
i love watchmojo
NO
ORANGE
*CHICKEN???!!!!*
orange chicken is americanized
December Fawn Hildegarde Vantas
which for some reason is not on the 10 popular American Asian food list
+knuclear2010 you have a point! :)
Rendang is amazing glad it made the honorable mentions
+The Ryuukei Apakah cm gua disini yang orang Indonesia
+Stefanov Alexandrov masa?
This channel make so many referencing mistakes:
Vietnam and Thailand is not "East Asia".
Fried Rice is not "a delicacy"
Intentionally make stupid mistake just to encourage a few responses, lame.
There are some of these Asian foods I haven't tried yet, so I may have to make them... if I can seach them up. They look so good! :D
How about stop stealing people's footage when they specifically said you couldn't use it? Simon and Martina work extremely hard to produce their videos, and your channel is a disgrace if you can't find footage authentically.
+EunFox response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
So early and no notification
Please stop using other people's footage without permission. Have some self-respect.
Asian food is amazing
Look, you might be in the legal right, but taking footage without permission is still a dick move. Just because you guys are basically the kings of "cut, paste, hey look what I made!" doesn't mean you get to steal whatever you want.
+WatchMojo.com I read the general comment. You're in the LEGAL right, that's already established, but just because it's legal doesn't make it ok. Simon and Martina asked you not to use their footage, but you go ahead and do it again. That's why it's a dick move. They actually filmed the footage, you know, did actual work that cost money and used people to set it up. As they've said in their own comment, they don't want their property being used as stock footage. You can claim hypocrisy and defamation, but the fact remains that you could've (obviously) chosen any other Asian cooking channel out there, but instead you chose to use a channel that expressed disagreement with you in the past. That's an antagonistic move regardless of legal standing, like saying, "Hey screw you, we do what we want! FAIR USE!" Well, of course people are going to call you out on a bullying move like that. Why is it so hard for you to respect their wishes?
+From Kentucky to Tokyo as mentioned in another comment, we really didn't get their reply to our reply, and assumed they reluctantly agreed and/or eventually saw the benefit. On our end, case closed.
+WatchMojo.com I get it, Fair use and all that, it's in legal terms, but who does that? Who, when asking for permission and supposedly "gets no response", uses the footage anyways? That's not how it's done, if you're going to ask at all and try to be respectful you then wait to be given permission, and if you get no response at all, then plain and simple you don't use it. It's like asking an artist to use their artwork and then it get's used anyways before any response is given, even if it might be a no (or no response), saying "ohey look it's good promotion for you ahahaha!" That shit's just not right.
Like I said, I get it, as far as videos go it's in your legal rights (according to you - I haven't done proper research myself I must admit), but still a hella dick move. Why bother asking in the first place if you're just going to assume everyone's gonna be okay with it, and then proceed to go ahead with it if there's no response? To me it makes asking a moot point.
And don't come back once again with "LEGAL USE SO SHHHH", just because it's legal doesn't make it less shitty looking on your part, and just because they "supposedly" (with quotations since there's no way for me to personally know if they did or not since I'm neither party) didn't respond also doesn't make y'all any more in the right. We can still dislike y'all for doing it and express our opinions rightly so, no? Free speech, amIright? Or wait, can we not share such feelings since it's defamation? I'd genuinely like to know...
I want to live in a world where people on mega channels don't steal content from the smaller channels in order to get more likes and subs. I want to live in a world where Fair Use isn't an excuse to use whatever footage you stumbled upon on the internet, which the original creators don't want to find used on said other channels. Unfortunately, we're not there yet.
+From Kentucky to Tokyo And I want to live in a world where people actually research facts before they comment (not talking about you, in general) & hear both sides of a debate/discussion before making accusations. Unfortunately, we're not there yet.
I love sushi! I also love sweet and sour pork and fried rice.
ผมเป็นคนไทยยังไม่รู้จัก thai peanut chicken เลยครับ ไม่คุ้นเล้ยยย
มันคล้ายๆข้าวพระรามลงสรง
+์Noobs Gamer
อาหารที่เค้าคิดว่าเป็นของเราและอาหารของเราจริงๆอ่ะมันไม่เห็นจะเหมือนกันเลยอ่ะ
+์Noobs Gamer Yes, I don't think it's actually a Thai dish, but it's just something that was "inspired" by Thai cuisine. For some reason, in America, whenever we try to make food that is supposed to be Thai-style, peanuts often get included just because the most popular Thai dish in the US (Pad Thai) is usually served with peanuts. It's weird, especially since Pad Grapao seems to be much more popular in Thailand than Pad Thai (& I would say Pad Grapao is a better tasting dish as well), but most people outside of Thailand don't seem to know about it.
+์Noobs Gamer Looks like "Panang" chicken curry
ผมเข้าใจว่าน่าจะเป็นแกงแพนง นะครับ
The Great Gaming Dude
You could be right, but I wonder why they wouldn't just call it that instead, especially since peanuts aren't a central ingredient in making it (they're not even used in many recipes for penang curry).
Chicken Wing's with Pork Fried Rice should be Number 1
Taking other people's footage is absolutely unacceptable. You people are awful.
+aquaslash response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
There should be a Top Ten Sushi video for WatchMojo.
I only saw the comments now, otherwise I would have answered immediately. I will post this general comment and then reply to Simon and Martina below, as well. [Added later to reflect them saying that they did indeed reply to us: we never received their reply to our formal response after the first clip in February 2016. I give them the benefit of the doubt that they did indeed send an email, but I can show you the email thread showing only emails from us to them and nothing back. Had we received it, without admitting any wrongdoing, we would have not used footage in a second clip out of courtesy. This second clip was actually researched and completed in Dec 2015 but published in April 2016. So not having heard back from them, we didn't go back to flag any further use as 100% of people who receive our responses finally understand how Fair Use works and/or realize the promo benefit.]
With regards to Copyright in general, since so many of the critics are clearly so misinformed: I realize that given the ability to comment online, people are quick to say something even though they ought to research the subject and hear both sides. Even though given how we use third-party footage, indeed we don't need to ask permission, originally when we started doing so we would ask. By and large, everyone welcomed it as promotion and as we grew in output, given tight turnaround times, we stopped asking for permission simply because, and I say this respectfully, indeed permission is not required via the Fair Use exemptions provided under Copyright Law. I find it very hypocritical for some to pile on and accuse us of one thing or another when those same people shout #WTFU otherwise. Are those keyboard warriors suggesting that Fair Use should only apply to traditional media companies like movie studios, record labels, video game publishers but not UA-cam producers? Do all channels we feature welcome and approve of this? No, I will not lie. But that is a reflection of their lack of understanding of copyright law or hypocrisy; for example, the odd Let's Play channel may object to, but those are the same channels that themselves feature third-party footage from video game publishers... yet turn around and cry foul when we feature short portions of their content in a Transformative review. Now that all said, with regards to Simon and Martina, we did receive a takedown some ago and we issued a counter-notification in the same way we would do so with a traditional media company. We took the time to respectfully outline Fair Use, explain that we view it as promotional and beneficial, and highlighted that they ought to be careful because indeed, in these days, the tide is shifting increasingly in favor of Fair Use and if (upon being informed of our rights via Fair Use) they disagreed, they could simply provide us with cases and precedents supporting their argument. They failed to do so. Why? Because they probably don't understand or like the law. Moreover, I explained in fairly diplomatic and friendly terms (granted tone gets lost in email) that if they issue a takedown against a given channel, some channels would not solely issue a counter-notification but also sue them for actual damages (example Lenz vs Universal Records, Michelle Phan versus Kaskade, and many other cases). We never threatened them of anything, however; if anything, we gave them a clear line of communication to myself to voice their disagreement or discontent, which legally we don't even need to do. It was the polite and fair thing to do. They chose not to reply, but have now decided to go online and defame us. That upsets me and makes me very angry. And if we find them misrepresenting our position and attacking our reputation, then yes, they have crossed the line (are we suggesting in any way that we will pursue them for defamation? No. But is what they are doing harmful to our reputation? Yes, of course it is... hence why I am explaining all of this in very transparent terms to explain that what we do is not illegal or unethical either. But having some new media producers criticize "old media" and/or UA-cam for not doing more to recognize and respect Fair Use but then turn around and claim that Fair Use shall not apply to them is plain hypocritical. Lastly, we have worked behind the scenes to help so many channels tackle unfair and excessive takedowns while encouraging them to respect the spirit of the law moreso than simply the letter of the law. We have also worked behind the scenes with UA-cam since 2008-ish to push for many of the positive changes over the years. Is the system perfect? No. But we believe that we are respectful of rights holders both "old" and "new" and fully respect the law, so having anyone accuse us otherwise publicly when we reached out to them privately is simply unfair and uncalled for. While some may chalk this up to jealousy and envy, I think it's a lack of understanding of the law. But if you have an issue, my door/email inbox is always open.
AK
Hypocritical? They've stated before that they don't want to be associated with you and this should be respected not matter what type of media it is. This is just giving you a bad image, worse than what it already was.
+WatchMojo.com I know I'm the one who brought this particular video to EYK's attention...I apologize. I just wanted to know if they were aware because of their previous comment on that other video.
I'm reading all these hate comments and would say that they're totally not necessary. I honestly don't know much about copyright issues and stuff relating to that for UA-cam, but I still really love you guys and I enjoy all your videos and will continue watching :D
I also really love Simon and Martina and will enjoy the best of both worlds.
Although using their videos may be legal, it is immoral. They do not want you to use their videos, but you continue to, even though you can just go ask someone else who is willing to allow you to use their videos. By using their videos against their will, it is almost as if you are rubbing the fact that you can in their faces. If you are trying to make money using other people's videos, you can at least get consent from the creator.
+INH 037 just shut up bruh. If you don't like it, then don't watch it. Let Mojo do what they want
Pinkk Elephantz gorgeous, message me
*mouth salivating*
Simon and Martina (eatyourkimchi) did NOT give you permission to use their footage in this video. And they expressly asked you not to use their videos. Poor show, WatchMojo.
+Helena Craig response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
I'm right here dying of laughter at the pronunciation of "Rendang".
You guys are horrible. How inhuman can you be, how demoralizing and disrespectfully shameless, to ask if you can use footage, be told NO, and do it ANYWAYS!? And not only that, you threatened legal action when they defended themselves against your theft. Are you drunk off your own Koolaid or something? That isn't what decent people do to other people!
+Sassy Finger Snap response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
Now I have a strong desire to taste every single one of these.
lol u guys used a part of a video that someone had said no too do u realise u just gave the person evidence to take u to court so enjoy dumdum
+radioactivekiwi response here if you care: ua-cam.com/video/S29NMLWKHQg/v-deo.html&lc=z12cebzgspe4vd0p304cjpxqzuqnsduprp40k
Hey, nice shirt!!
Im in love with Asian food
Shrimp Mai Fan is my favorite Asian dish! And I like it extra spicy too!
Good to see Mike from strictly dumplings channel!
It is a shame that soups were not included in this list. Pho is a daily staple of the Vietnamese, Cambodian and the Lao. It is also becoming very popular in the United States. The thing that makes it popular is the fresh flavor and the versatility of ingredients, just like the Banh mi.
Also, I know curry chicken is probably considered an Indian dish, but it is also served in Vietnamese and Thai restaurants.
I used to love orange chicken or honey walnut chicken, but now I mostly only do a small dish of egg drop soup and a couple pieces of sushi. Also LOOOOOOOOVE those sesame bald with the Sweet bean paste.
For Chinese,
Of course, the General Tso Chicken with white rice and a shrimp egg roll. Or, the Beef Egg Foo Young with white rice and a shrimp egg roll.
For Japanese,
The Peanut ChickenTeriyaki with the salad splashed in Balasmic Vinegrette and a shot of hot sake!
HI I'M FROM VIETNAM!!! 🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳
Especially California Rolls.
glad to see the right grammar "bánh mỳ" from Vietnam :)
I really shouldn't have watched this on an empty stomach.
For those who are asking where Pho should be on the list, it's not there because that's a Vietnamese soup and the announcer said no soups.
What about Chicken/Egg Fu Young? An American dish that's on every UK Chinese takeaway menu.