Exactly, I can't tell you how many times in the opening I absolutely massacre people at my 900 rating blitz in the opening, and then all of a sudden in the middle game after some shuffling, suddenly game is equal or losing for me despite not really making clear blunders.
It's near impossible to stop sophisticated online chess cheaters below ~2000 rating. Once you get to around 2200 - 2300 rating it starts being more obvious who the cheaters are.
@@BlueFeverSoft Then the question becomes which hint do you act upon to not arouse suspicion. If the cheating move is not consistent with the quality of the previous moves then it raises eyebrows. My rating is around 2300 by the way and I've pretty much seen it all.
As the other comment says, Naka himself says the higher you get the less you need it to cheat - just a glance now and again. Making detection difficult. My real life rating is around 1800 - but I'd never claim to have "seen it all". It's that kind of head in the sand thinking that prevents this problem being addressed.
@@BlueFeverSoft This problem has actually been addressed and solved to a degree. Players are required to set up cameras to record themselves when playing in prize money tournaments. On the other hand, if you as a 1800 player played a 1900+ player using your engine, you would sooner or later get caught either because of your irregular style of play or finding key moves that an 1800 player wouldn't normally find. *removing head from sand*
Exactly, I can't tell you how many times in the opening I absolutely massacre people at my 900 rating blitz in the opening, and then all of a sudden in the middle game after some shuffling, suddenly game is equal or losing for me despite not really making clear blunders.
It's near impossible to stop sophisticated online chess cheaters below ~2000 rating. Once you get to around 2200 - 2300 rating it starts being more obvious who the cheaters are.
I don't think so. At that rating you only need one or two hints.
@@BlueFeverSoft Then the question becomes which hint do you act upon to not arouse suspicion. If the cheating move is not consistent with the quality of the previous moves then it raises eyebrows. My rating is around 2300 by the way and I've pretty much seen it all.
Nakamura himself said at a top level you only need one or two checks and that's enough. It gets harder to detect, not easier
As the other comment says, Naka himself says the higher you get the less you need it to cheat - just a glance now and again. Making detection difficult. My real life rating is around 1800 - but I'd never claim to have "seen it all". It's that kind of head in the sand thinking that prevents this problem being addressed.
@@BlueFeverSoft This problem has actually been addressed and solved to a degree. Players are required to set up cameras to record themselves when playing in prize money tournaments. On the other hand, if you as a 1800 player played a 1900+ player using your engine, you would sooner or later get caught either because of your irregular style of play or finding key moves that an 1800 player wouldn't normally find. *removing head from sand*