Battletech: Why Do We Love VTOLs? - Helicopters and More!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
  • Today we look at a few examples of VTOL vehicles you could add to liven things up in your games of tabletop #Battletech.
    I want to do a little cheerleading for some great #Battletech vehicles in preparation for the Mercenaries Kickstarter that goes live in a few weeks.
    If you want to support this and other efforts, the best way to support the channel is through KoFi.
    ko-fi.com/mechanicalfrog12
    #catalystgamelabs #Tabletop #Lore #SciFi
    If you think I missed an important one, let me know in the comments below.
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 115

  • @weaselwolf
    @weaselwolf Рік тому +23

    The LRM variant warriors saw some good use on our tables. Their speed and indirect fire capacity makes them very tricky to pin down

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +3

      I can see how that would be irritatingly effective.

  • @A88mph
    @A88mph Рік тому +31

    "Control the sky, control the game." Words my dad said to me as I played 'Starcraft' when I was a kid. And I've carried that as my primary battle doctrine since.
    Sadly, since Aerotech rules are too complex for my group (for now, but one day we'll figure them out), VTOLs are the only option to apply this in Battletech.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +7

      Still a very fun option.

    • @robrib2682
      @robrib2682 Рік тому +3

      If plane rules are too complex for everybody then I would suggest giving everyone like one or two planes and having that be the match so that people can sort the madness

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +2

      @@robrib2682 Yeah it's definitely a dip your toes in the water situation.

    • @A88mph
      @A88mph Рік тому +4

      @@robrib2682 Oh we did one time, and we'll need to again. The game was in open space, and so would the next one. Then we'll introduce a planets gravity field, and slowly descend to the surface.
      Eventually, we'll be comfortable with them. One thing we all agree on: CGL needs to make an 'Aerotech Manual.' for all the flight rules.

    • @robrib2682
      @robrib2682 Рік тому

      @@A88mph well, if they do it as a kickstarter then hopefully they'll redesign a stupid looking fighter

  • @TheClingClang
    @TheClingClang Рік тому +9

    If we're talking VTOLs you gotta give a shout out to the Karnov.
    It's dirt cheap and can haul anything and everything you need right up to the frontlines.

  • @yourseatatthetable
    @yourseatatthetable Рік тому +22

    VTOL's have so many uses it's hard to cover all of them. This becomes increasingly more so the larger the campaign gets. It's hard to see all the uses when we're only focused on a company sized or lower engagement. However, if your force is part of a larger formation, one covering larger areas, then as the commander of such a force, those VTOL really come into their own. Fast Recon, raiders, logistics hunters, moving infantry from one area to another quickly, and so on. Just an opinion of course.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +2

      Absolutely. Plus they're just neat. :D

    • @yourseatatthetable
      @yourseatatthetable Рік тому +2

      @@MechanicalFrog that they are.

    • @phonepoies
      @phonepoies Рік тому +2

      What i always was irritated by is the lack of logistics awareness. Eg. Karnov can carry 6 tons of ammunition and other gear quickly anywhere. With a sensible choice of weaponry that's enough to ameliorate/fix many of the ammunition limitations a formation has, especially since it regularily is employed as field crane, so you can rearm in the field without too much hassle. That can very much change the options of weapon composition even in in a single engagement. Gimme 4 Karnov and a few combat VTOLs to keep them save, and I'll keep a company in the field supplied forever.

    • @yourseatatthetable
      @yourseatatthetable Рік тому +3

      @@phonepoies There was a time when such things did matter. Now most folks are all about battle value and tweaking a formation to fit the current challenge. I grouse about the lack of application of logistics all the time. Hell, it was this very topic that did more to cause the Clan's to fail on Tukayyid than anything else and the novel's said so, making it cannon for the dissenters.

    • @phonepoies
      @phonepoies Рік тому +1

      @@yourseatatthetable exactly

  • @Takenmynameandmycat
    @Takenmynameandmycat Місяць тому +1

    When the fluff text states in effect “Yeah, this thing is so loud that we use it for herding our giant land squid” there’s a small part of you that doesn’t care how effective it actually it is in game.
    Then there’s” We built the Spruce Goose of VTOL’s and it’s coming to take yer mechs… Yoink!”

  • @captainbanjo1617
    @captainbanjo1617 Рік тому +4

    I like some of the Wolf’s Dragoon VTOLs - they look like they can fly, which you can’t say about all aircraft in battletech

  • @fgcvndhdgrhfdfg
    @fgcvndhdgrhfdfg Рік тому +4

    Everyone loves a VTOL. Except the target of one... they don't love them, at all.

  • @defiantmechwarrior2397
    @defiantmechwarrior2397 Рік тому +8

    So mw5 actually got how fragile the warrior is correct. Wow. Great video.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +5

      Unfortunately, it did. VTOL pilots live short but glorious lives if they slowly approach mechs and hover over them... silly MW5
      Imagine how irritating they would be if they hid behind hills and popped up to take shots...

    • @defiantmechwarrior2397
      @defiantmechwarrior2397 Рік тому +5

      Imagine if they actually performed maneuvers

    • @RecklessFables
      @RecklessFables 8 місяців тому +1

      Lack of TMM since they just sit there and face-tank PPCs

  • @ian5395
    @ian5395 Рік тому +4

    A moment to appreciate the surge in Frog production lately.
    Maybe I'm just late to the party and the algorithm is slugging me. Iunno.
    Good stuff though. Thank you Froggo

  • @ethanwhalen8202
    @ethanwhalen8202 Рік тому +5

    On the table top, I’ve really enjoyed playing the balacs and the shun transport. They’re deadly in AS if ppl don’t bring any flak units

  • @tnh723
    @tnh723 Рік тому +3

    Even in 1988 the humble vtol had unprecedented reach and mobility even if they were incredibly frail. Fast forward to 1991 we picked up the new TROs and were blown away by the Yellowjacket. Holy cow did we love using that thing. The Hawk Moth came many years later when we were also into the MW clix Age of Destruction era. Solid video as always. Longtime subbie here :-)

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      Disrespect the VTOL at your peril. Thanks for watching! I appreciate it.

  • @windsleeper
    @windsleeper Рік тому +7

    The vehicle video and this VTOL video were great overviews. Would love to see more like this!

  • @BlazingOwnager
    @BlazingOwnager Рік тому +5

    Doing a Periphery campaign right now, and VTOLs are great bang for the buck for those kinds of empires. Far cheaper than mechs and maybe even more useful if their main goal is to mostly deal with poorly equipped pirates. That and Conventional Fighters, anyway.

  • @LadyNightscale
    @LadyNightscale 4 місяці тому +2

    The H-7C Lrm Warrior is unironically a fantastic machine for its bV, adding a pair or trio of them to just fly around the map and slam backshots into enemy fire support is wildly useful

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  4 місяці тому +1

      Quite the wildcards. Operation Chaos.

    • @LadyNightscale
      @LadyNightscale 4 місяці тому

      Call my 2 lances of Warriors the Spanish Inquisition cus no one expects them and they end up tormenting their opponents.@@MechanicalFrog

  • @mathewkelly9968
    @mathewkelly9968 Рік тому +4

    Oh yeh baby the Cavalry gotta say I'm a fan , keep them as safe as possible then swarm in for the crits . Gotta be the best VTOL . And no yelling at these choices

  • @LolixLP
    @LolixLP 3 місяці тому +2

    Would love more VTOL videos from you. Maybe one of these on Aerospace Fighters could be cool, too.

  • @Kaiju-Driver
    @Kaiju-Driver Рік тому +1

    I'm so looking forward to the new kickstarter, those vehicles look sweet!

  • @kierdalemodels
    @kierdalemodels Рік тому +4

    That was excellent👏👏👏I didn’t know the Gossamer but, being a Raven fan, now I really want some. I’d love to see more on VTOLs, or other air assets.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +1

      Glad you enjoyed! Working on another tank video for next week.

    • @KG-jm1zl
      @KG-jm1zl Рік тому +3

      Well until you can get the model, use something in leu of it, part of why I love BattleTech

    • @Takenmynameandmycat
      @Takenmynameandmycat Місяць тому +1

      The Gossamer goes hard on the nostalgia for me, it really feels like something that would have been part of Ring Raiders.

    • @kierdalemodels
      @kierdalemodels Місяць тому

      @@Takenmynameandmycat Ring Raiders! Now that takes me back!😆

  • @HouseDavieMerc
    @HouseDavieMerc Рік тому +1

    Love the well worn TRO 3025 in your videos ! ( As well as the U on the dial!)
    IMHO the Karnov should have been included. If you need to move infantry FAST in the early eras
    it is the way ! In games where objectives are important it's extremely valuable.
    The Ferret is great as well because of it's low buy in cost. Not only a cheap scout but if your opponent
    fields Warriors the Armored Ferret is a pest that it just can't shake . A single MG doesn't mean much
    unless it moves at 15/23 and it's outside of your firing arcs every time you
    loose initiative.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      Never underestimate a determined vehicle with a machine gun.

  • @biggrigg4281
    @biggrigg4281 Рік тому +8

    VTOLs are fun, but you need to move them fast and keep them at long range, or they will die.

  • @robrib2682
    @robrib2682 Рік тому

    Remember kids it isn't munchkining if you swarm the ac20 hunchback with warriors, it's just suppressive fire so that you can get your own mechs in position

  • @tannerdowney2802
    @tannerdowney2802 Рік тому +1

    Really tall, legless, scout mech. Love it!

  • @ogrehaslayers605
    @ogrehaslayers605 Рік тому +3

    As Dune fans, my son and I pretend our VTOLs are Ornithopters.

  • @greysonjones5429
    @greysonjones5429 Рік тому +2

    Just so you know, you said "Longlevity" Instead of longevity. I'm sure you probably noticed as you went over this video, but that's probably my favorite new word from you.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +1

      Yeah it's an artifact from my childhood that I've never been able to shake. It sneaks in at odd moments.

  • @acetraker1988
    @acetraker1988 Рік тому +2

    Using Advanced Combat Vee Construction Rules. I made the Combat Vee featured heavily in MW5.
    Igor-77 (4 AC/2 6.5 Tons Armour) 50 Ton VTOL, 6/9 Movement.
    Igor-99 (3 UAC2s W/ CASE with 8 Tons Armour) 50 Ton VTOL, 6/9 Movement.

  • @squizzlor
    @squizzlor Рік тому +1

    My first use of a vetol, has scared me out of utilizing them. One LBX is all it takes. Sure it wasn’t downed by the lbx, but seeing how easily a little canister shot can strip a roater made me think.

  • @JosephMitchell-zw3db
    @JosephMitchell-zw3db 2 дні тому +1

    VTOL is affective

  • @Aleksandrgrc
    @Aleksandrgrc Рік тому +1

    I made a paper gossamer. It's probably close to twice the size of the mini. This thing can have a lbx10!? That's a fast way to track a Lance of tanks.

  • @sebastiang.5032
    @sebastiang.5032 Рік тому +2

    Keep the great videos coming! 😁👍

  • @Silverlightlive
    @Silverlightlive Рік тому +2

    I love VTOLs because they fit in well with my boom and zoom strategy. I hate VTOLs because their hit table is absolutely horrible. So you've got to keep them at their medium range, with full motion, or strictly as support vehicles.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      ABM - Always Be Moving. :D

    • @Silverlightlive
      @Silverlightlive Рік тому +1

      @@MechanicalFrog Boom and Zoom. I once saved an entire company from a Clan assault because I kept them running. By whatever luck, my opponent kept rolling one under what he needed to hit. I believe in maneuverability.
      But look at that hit table. Its like half "Rotor"

  • @GamingPsychologist
    @GamingPsychologist Рік тому +2

    The Peregrine has always had a place in my heart. Fast with SRMs and Machine guns. Can harass like no other in my mind. It is unfortunately quite fragile, but VTOL pilots often live fast and die hard in the inner sphere.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +1

      I've always had a fondness for machine guns in BT. I just wish they were slightly longer range...

    • @GamingPsychologist
      @GamingPsychologist Рік тому

      @@MechanicalFrog I agree. I wish they had a longer range as well. I do find it hilarious though to machine gun boat a light or very fast medium and rush around blasting everything. Good Times. The ammo explosions are legendary.

  • @randomnetsurfer
    @randomnetsurfer Місяць тому +1

    Now i want to put AP Gauss Rifles on a Gossamer... making it a Gaussamer. :D

  • @bthsr7113
    @bthsr7113 10 місяців тому +1

    Fire up the Airwolf theme, we're going to have fun giving people nightmares and lessons in respecting air power.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  10 місяців тому

      We used to watch that on a tiny black and white TV.

  • @lebe5894
    @lebe5894 Рік тому +2

    Mantis gang, best vtol.

  • @mathewkelly9968
    @mathewkelly9968 Рік тому +4

    The Biggest let down on the much vaunted Yellowjacket is the 6/9 movement which isnt enough for a VTOL , I agree the hawk moth is better .

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +3

      If given the choice, I will go with the Hawk Moth. The normal Gauss is just too much for a 30 ton VTOL.

    • @Ishlacorrin
      @Ishlacorrin Рік тому +2

      I agree for the most part, but a Gauss Rifle does make the Yellowjacket a target that cannot be ignored, so they can be used to keep some of the heat off of your more important mechs and vehicles. In that situation they are either reducing damage to your other forces, or dealing significant damage to the enemy, either is a good thing.
      Still I do love the Light Gauss as a weapon system, not as deadly but the range more than makes up for it.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      @@Ishlacorrin I think I would prefer my VTOLs in the, "can be ignored some of the time," niche rather than the can't be ignored niche.

    • @KG-jm1zl
      @KG-jm1zl Рік тому +1

      @@MechanicalFrog hmmm tbh a pair of lances of Yellow Jackets for their price and if the map is big enough, means they can out flank and get to the rear of enemy.
      Forces the otherside to either water down their combat capability against your own Mechs, Vics & Infantry or risk 4 Guass Hugs.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      @@KG-jm1zl Could cause some havoc, for sure.

  • @TheBoardGameKaptain
    @TheBoardGameKaptain Рік тому +1

    My fav VTOL that you didn't mention is the Karnov, both the transport and AC20 versions.

  • @joshua425
    @joshua425 Рік тому +3

    We love mechanical frog 🐸

  • @andrewszigeti2174
    @andrewszigeti2174 Рік тому +2

    The Ferret is always underrated. I'm not aware of any faster VTOL (15/23), it can carry a squad of infantry (four can carry a whole platoon), and it can keep anything spotted for indirect fire, period. Your enemy simply CANNOT sneak up on you if you make intelligent use of Ferrets.
    If you're ever tempted to use it's built-in MG, you're using it wrong.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      Maybe as a glorious final stand... MG bullets bouncing off the Atlas's head...

    • @andrewszigeti2174
      @andrewszigeti2174 Рік тому +1

      @@MechanicalFrog If your Ferret is stuck for a glorious last stand, charge. Sure, it's only 12 points of damage (at most), but that's better than you'd get from the MG.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      @@andrewszigeti2174 :D

  • @hentaioverwhelming
    @hentaioverwhelming Рік тому +1

    Lockheed and inexpensive... lololol

  • @bloodraven8020
    @bloodraven8020 2 місяці тому +1

    Battletech roflcopter goes soysoysoysoy

  • @JosephMitchell-zw3db
    @JosephMitchell-zw3db 2 дні тому +1

    Ferret 5 ton Inf transport cheep fast

  • @alecciarosewater7438
    @alecciarosewater7438 2 місяці тому +1

    So it's not some sort of industrial abomination cobbled together from spare spaceship parts? I thought the sphere was incapable of manufacturing new mechs? And what kind of self-respecting mech pilot would let the air support steal all their glory? eh just sweep a laser across the sky until you hit it or maybe ask the local spacers to ram it with their shuttles
    It would be neat to have the the dropship from Aliens or the jet hovercraft from Battlezone 98 as my air support. I might consider using it if it was flown by terminators who crash helis into human mechs so they can board and kill the pilot. Otherwise I have to ask what this realistic design is doing in my stompy robot game

  • @sim.frischh9781
    @sim.frischh9781 Рік тому +2

    I like VTOLs, but their representation in BT games has usually been atrocious.
    Looking at real world helicopters like the Apache, the Tiger, the Rooikat or the Crocodile, usually they hug the terrain, only peek out whe they have a target and then slide back into cover, so long rangenweapons like the AC2, the ER large laser and LRMs seem the best choice.
    VTOLs, the Harrier is probably the best comparison, not sure how well the F-35 actuall fares.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +1

      Maybe there could be a VTOL peek and shoot rule...

    • @sim.frischh9781
      @sim.frischh9781 Рік тому +1

      @@MechanicalFrog There definitely should be. Plus there are those bits on top of some helicopters that allow them to peek over cover too.
      An example is the Kiowa helicopter that featured it on top of the rotor mast. In the movie Fire Birds with Nicolas Cage it was shown

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +1

      @@sim.frischh9781 Off the top of my head, I could see a rule that says if the VTOL is behind cover 2+ should be able to fire at a target. If they do, any return fire has a plus 3 to-hit modifier. If they don't fire, there's no LOS.

    • @sim.frischh9781
      @sim.frischh9781 Рік тому +1

      @@MechanicalFrog they would need one of those mast modules too to peek over the cover, then they would get a to hit bonus or something, same as if they had a C3 contact or such.
      Seems practical.

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому +1

      @@sim.frischh9781 I brought it up on Twitter and a few people said that a 2+ would be more reasonable and there might need to be a requirement that the VTOL not be moving previously in the same turn. Otherwise, I think it could work enough for playtesting.

  • @mathewkelly9968
    @mathewkelly9968 Рік тому +1

    Meh Vtols I'm so fringe it's all about my Nisos WiGEs

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      *Genuine confusion*

    • @mathewkelly9968
      @mathewkelly9968 Рік тому +1

      @@MechanicalFrog from the 3145 Capellan book , Wing in Ground Effect vehicle the Soviets where big on it in the day

  • @youtmeme
    @youtmeme Рік тому +1

    the heli versions are useless..in the future, more vtols as jets are FAAAR more useful!!

    • @MechanicalFrog
      @MechanicalFrog  Рік тому

      In the real world, VTOL drones are going to be ubiquitous.