Thank you so much for publishing these lectures I always wanted to reorganize my knowledge regarding different compactess notions! Any plans on topology classes?
@12:10: I think she made a logical thinking error here. Not totally bounded means (negating the definition), that... 'there exists an ε>0' such that for all finite sets of y1, ..., yk (etc., keep negating). It should, however, not start with 'for every ε>0'.
Thank you so much for publishing these lectures I always wanted to reorganize my knowledge regarding different compactess notions!
Any plans on topology classes?
2:19 For a general metric space topologically compactness implies closure and boundedness and not viceversa.
Thanks for mentioning, because it confused me. I find it strange no one in the lectures is asking any questions about it.
Please make a course on number theory and abstract algebra
@12:10:
I think she made a logical thinking error here.
Not totally bounded means (negating the definition), that...
'there exists an ε>0' such that for all finite sets of y1, ..., yk (etc., keep negating).
It should, however, not start with 'for every ε>0'.
0:22
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊