1:24 ... what is what that smile after "some meat." Anyway, I am glad she is getting better. Hopefully she is sticking with a diet that sees her stay that way.
glad she is starting to feel better. juggling diet balance is hard for a lot of people. not everyone can do veggie/vegan diets, meat has tons of stuff we need to be healthy. and before vegans try and come at me with "plant based protein is just as viable": no. there have been TONS of fact-based studies that show plant protein and meat protein are VASTLY different in structure and composition and other stuff and the human race evolved on meat. you can't erase thousands of years of evolution just because "animals have feelings". also, those animals you think are "too smart to be eaten" get eaten by other animals in the wild ALL THE TIME. furthermore, do you know how much animal death has to happen in order to grow the fields of your precious meat-replacement plants?
usually when people say vegan and vegetarian diets are viable, they're not saying plant-based proteins alone will suffice, they're saying additional supplements plus a plant-based diet will suffice. they're arguing that with technology and science as advanced as it is, we can produce the necessary synthetic nutrients without having to harm animals. additionally, all diets are built off of some level of exploitation and harm; of course eating soybeans is built off exploitation as well, but the point is to reduce the amount of harm you cause, and for the most part plant-based diets do reduce more harm than animal protein diets. just like there's nuance to eating meat, there's more nuance to the other side of the argument as well. im not vegetarian, ill happily eat meat when i feel like it (which is like all of the time), but it's silly to argue one side is diminishing your side as you diminish theirs as well.
@@dankmemester123 so to make vegan work I not only have to spend money on food, but now I'm also reliant on popping pills and spending even more money on said pills? and how much harm to the environment does THAT do, replacing 1 industry with 2 in order to get the same stuff? that makes sense to you? also, meat production can adapt to far more local climates, plants can't almost at all. so now you have to ship it further and further distances, causing more and more environmental harm. people can choose to go vegan and/or veggie all they want for whatever reason they feel like. The sanctimonious "for the planet" jargon will fall on deaf ears when it comes to me because I've done my own research. It only shifts where harm is done, it doesn't eliminate any of it at all. A person can be entirely self-sufficient on a normal omnivore diet, there's a reason you don't see any vegan/veggie homesteading.
@@failfurby im not sure why you're bringing cost into this; our current infrastructure doesn't support vegetarian diets as a default, so it's always going to be expensive. not to mention, eating healthy is more expensive regardless of whether it's plant-based or animal-based; quality of diets is correlated with SES, with data specifically supporting higher cost diets leading to better health. it's not going to be more affordable to eat organic steak than it is to eat organic broccoli, for instance. the argument vegetarians and vegans have (the real ones, not the valley girls who do it just for show) is that it's very much viable to swap our infrastructure over to plant-based protein with supplements. once the infrastructure has been setup, the cost will normalize to how it is with animal-based diets. also, you're not popping pills, you're taking supplements; many current foodstuffs already have supplements in them, too. water is fluoridated, bread has added vitamins, lactose free milk has lactase enzymes, etc.. the environmental harm with plant-based diets is unrelated to the actual plant-based diet; rather, it has more to do with how mass production works in our society that doesn't emphasize environmental safety as much as it should. "because I've done my own research." people who say this never actually understand what research is. don't do your own research. read the research qualified experts have published through meticulous studies that have been tried through the scientific community. and when you do, realize that you have to contextualize it within the framework established by that scientific community, not just your own interpretation. a good portion of my graduate studies when I was pursuing my PhD in physics was just developing a proper framework to analyze research, learning what to draw from papers and how, learning to ask the right questions. anyway, its empirically better for the environment to have a vegetarian diet. this is simply the empirical evidence. i cant post links, but here are some paper titles you can look up yourself: "Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change." "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health." "Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities." lastly, ill add a personal note: as I've said, I will happily eat meat. i disagree with vegans in their approach with individual action, as I don't think you can introduce systemic change through consumer-side boycotts. however, their goal is not scientifically invalid. there is nuanced criticism to be had and explored here, such as the futility of establishing solidarity with consumer-side boycotts when the industries favoring animal-based diets have a chokehold on low-income households; hence, im obviously not going to go around shaming people for eating meat when they can't afford impossible meat, especially when I eat meat myself, and ive rarely seen a *real* vegetarian do that either (ive seen posers, but every movement has posers). what im reiterating again and again is that you cannot recognize the valid nuanced criticisms people have about plant-based diets while ignorantly rejecting the very valid criticisms people have about animal-based diets.
@@dankmemester123 i stopped reading your wall of babbling, and stopped caring about responding to it, when you insulted my intelligence. next time, dont assume you know what someone has or hasn't done when it comes to researching a topic.
What school doesn't teach you about a healthy diet? Surely we all know about the food triangle right? (Even though it's not quite accurate.) Glad she's doing better, but she's been failed by her education system and her parents.
I didn’t know she was sick, but glad she’s getting better.
all those microwave meals catch up to you .
That's good to hear 🙌🏻
I always imagined Saruei as a carnivore.
People don't understand how important having a fully rounded diet is
I’m so glad my dad taught me how to cook a good medium-rare eye fillet steak.
"How are you supposed to know???"
They don't teach that in school before you're 18 in her country????
1:24 ... what is what that smile after "some meat."
Anyway, I am glad she is getting better. Hopefully she is sticking with a diet that sees her stay that way.
I'm super happy she's getting healthier! Didn't know she wasn't feeling well.
Oh yeah, not being able to get out of bed and exercise intolerance? Anemia will do that to you!
Glad to hear it
You are a genuine nice person ✨️ 💛 ❤️ 💖 💕
glad she is starting to feel better. juggling diet balance is hard for a lot of people.
not everyone can do veggie/vegan diets, meat has tons of stuff we need to be healthy. and before vegans try and come at me with "plant based protein is just as viable": no. there have been TONS of fact-based studies that show plant protein and meat protein are VASTLY different in structure and composition and other stuff and the human race evolved on meat. you can't erase thousands of years of evolution just because "animals have feelings". also, those animals you think are "too smart to be eaten" get eaten by other animals in the wild ALL THE TIME. furthermore, do you know how much animal death has to happen in order to grow the fields of your precious meat-replacement plants?
The creatine buff
usually when people say vegan and vegetarian diets are viable, they're not saying plant-based proteins alone will suffice, they're saying additional supplements plus a plant-based diet will suffice. they're arguing that with technology and science as advanced as it is, we can produce the necessary synthetic nutrients without having to harm animals. additionally, all diets are built off of some level of exploitation and harm; of course eating soybeans is built off exploitation as well, but the point is to reduce the amount of harm you cause, and for the most part plant-based diets do reduce more harm than animal protein diets.
just like there's nuance to eating meat, there's more nuance to the other side of the argument as well. im not vegetarian, ill happily eat meat when i feel like it (which is like all of the time), but it's silly to argue one side is diminishing your side as you diminish theirs as well.
@@dankmemester123 so to make vegan work I not only have to spend money on food, but now I'm also reliant on popping pills and spending even more money on said pills? and how much harm to the environment does THAT do, replacing 1 industry with 2 in order to get the same stuff? that makes sense to you? also, meat production can adapt to far more local climates, plants can't almost at all. so now you have to ship it further and further distances, causing more and more environmental harm. people can choose to go vegan and/or veggie all they want for whatever reason they feel like. The sanctimonious "for the planet" jargon will fall on deaf ears when it comes to me because I've done my own research. It only shifts where harm is done, it doesn't eliminate any of it at all. A person can be entirely self-sufficient on a normal omnivore diet, there's a reason you don't see any vegan/veggie homesteading.
@@failfurby im not sure why you're bringing cost into this; our current infrastructure doesn't support vegetarian diets as a default, so it's always going to be expensive. not to mention, eating healthy is more expensive regardless of whether it's plant-based or animal-based; quality of diets is correlated with SES, with data specifically supporting higher cost diets leading to better health. it's not going to be more affordable to eat organic steak than it is to eat organic broccoli, for instance.
the argument vegetarians and vegans have (the real ones, not the valley girls who do it just for show) is that it's very much viable to swap our infrastructure over to plant-based protein with supplements. once the infrastructure has been setup, the cost will normalize to how it is with animal-based diets.
also, you're not popping pills, you're taking supplements; many current foodstuffs already have supplements in them, too. water is fluoridated, bread has added vitamins, lactose free milk has lactase enzymes, etc..
the environmental harm with plant-based diets is unrelated to the actual plant-based diet; rather, it has more to do with how mass production works in our society that doesn't emphasize environmental safety as much as it should.
"because I've done my own research."
people who say this never actually understand what research is. don't do your own research. read the research qualified experts have published through meticulous studies that have been tried through the scientific community.
and when you do, realize that you have to contextualize it within the framework established by that scientific community, not just your own interpretation. a good portion of my graduate studies when I was pursuing my PhD in physics was just developing a proper framework to analyze research, learning what to draw from papers and how, learning to ask the right questions.
anyway, its empirically better for the environment to have a vegetarian diet. this is simply the empirical evidence. i cant post links, but here are some paper titles you can look up yourself:
"Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change."
"Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health."
"Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities."
lastly, ill add a personal note: as I've said, I will happily eat meat. i disagree with vegans in their approach with individual action, as I don't think you can introduce systemic change through consumer-side boycotts. however, their goal is not scientifically invalid.
there is nuanced criticism to be had and explored here, such as the futility of establishing solidarity with consumer-side boycotts when the industries favoring animal-based diets have a chokehold on low-income households; hence, im obviously not going to go around shaming people for eating meat when they can't afford impossible meat, especially when I eat meat myself, and ive rarely seen a *real* vegetarian do that either (ive seen posers, but every movement has posers).
what im reiterating again and again is that you cannot recognize the valid nuanced criticisms people have about plant-based diets while ignorantly rejecting the very valid criticisms people have about animal-based diets.
@@dankmemester123 i stopped reading your wall of babbling, and stopped caring about responding to it, when you insulted my intelligence. next time, dont assume you know what someone has or hasn't done when it comes to researching a topic.
I’m here
What school doesn't teach you about a healthy diet? Surely we all know about the food triangle right? (Even though it's not quite accurate.)
Glad she's doing better, but she's been failed by her education system and her parents.
hope she I didn't have vegan fans