The Venice example compares a two-point perspective and a one-point perspective, which architects call an elevation ( your "frontal view." It is helpful to know the correct terminology to have a professional understanding of these views.
Hi friend! Architectural designer here. An elevation is not the same as a one-point perspective; elevations are orthogonal, with no vanishing point. Simply calling the perspective a frontal view is correct :)
@@dillonvandergriff4124 "An elevation is not the same as a one-point perspective." That is correct. But one-point perspectives may contain elevations, as is the case here. The entirety of the view in question is a one-point perspective, as evidenced by the sides of the left and right buildings receding to a central vanishing point. However, the central building being discussed is the issue, and it is a rectified (orthogonal) frontal view, which in architectural terminology is an elevation. That is what I was referring to. The presenter used the term "frontal view" to indicate that the view was flat, not in perspective. I offered a more specific term to articulate the distinction to a general audience. All three front facades in the view are in elevation. If the presenter wants to be perceived as an authority, he is better served by using professional terms that he can explain to his audience. As a former architect practicing architectural photography, I create and evaluate these kinds of images all day long.
While Milanote is a decent tool, I often find myself struggling to determine the best way to organize my board. Although they provide templates, I still get stuck when deciding how to structure my boards. When things aren't perfectly organized, it becomes frustrating, and I end up abandoning the task altogether.
Love the hero shoot. To bad most clients don't like the closeup shoot as it doesn't show most of their work but most of your work... Technically any angle you choose falls into one of those categories you just need to understand what it is you are showing and why. Thanks, sponsor also looks interesting, used something else a few years ago sketchboard or something like that. but this one looks better.
It was really interesting and exact subject that I was searching for but all the examples are about the projects which has only one building and mostly a tall one but I'm working on a project in historical context which is located on a horizontal city with narrow streets and I have to design a group of buildings for my infill design. So I don't exactly know what to do for renderings' views.
glad you liked the video Zahra! You can check out the pages and links of each render artist, they used different kinds of buildings and projects in different settings, so maybe you can find the one that can work best as a reference.
Thanks to Milanote for sponsoring this video! Sign up for free and start your next creative project: milanote.com/showitbetter0922
This is so good! These techniques are way more important than the rendering engine itself. Loved the editing of this video as well. Sick!!! 🔥
thanks man! yessssssssss: less focus on render engines and more on principles! (spent more time than I would have liked with the editing haha)
Its funny watching this channel at the same time as im being told graphic skills arent valuable in my architecture office.
haha being a good architect is 50% knowing how to design and 50% knowing how to communicate that design to the world. They depend on each other!
Can you talk about the different lens sizes to acheive different render styles?
although its a very small topic for a complete video! but it is an interesting topic! Will maybe create an IG post on it
Your analysis and presentation is always very interesting and fresh,love your approach ! 👌👌👌
thanks Yiotis!
The Venice example compares a two-point perspective and a one-point perspective, which architects call an elevation ( your "frontal view." It is helpful to know the correct terminology to have a professional understanding of these views.
Hi friend! Architectural designer here. An elevation is not the same as a one-point perspective; elevations are orthogonal, with no vanishing point. Simply calling the perspective a frontal view is correct :)
@@dillonvandergriff4124 "An elevation is not the same as a one-point perspective." That is correct. But one-point perspectives may contain elevations, as is the case here. The entirety of the view in question is a one-point perspective, as evidenced by the sides of the left and right buildings receding to a central vanishing point. However, the central building being discussed is the issue, and it is a rectified (orthogonal) frontal view, which in architectural terminology is an elevation. That is what I was referring to. The presenter used the term "frontal view" to indicate that the view was flat, not in perspective. I offered a more specific term to articulate the distinction to a general audience. All three front facades in the view are in elevation. If the presenter wants to be perceived as an authority, he is better served by using professional terms that he can explain to his audience. As a former architect practicing architectural photography, I create and evaluate these kinds of images all day long.
While Milanote is a decent tool, I often find myself struggling to determine the best way to organize my board. Although they provide templates, I still get stuck when deciding how to structure my boards. When things aren't perfectly organized, it becomes frustrating, and I end up abandoning the task altogether.
Love the hero shoot. To bad most clients don't like the closeup shoot as it doesn't show most of their work but most of your work...
Technically any angle you choose falls into one of those categories you just need to understand what it is you are showing and why.
Thanks, sponsor also looks interesting, used something else a few years ago sketchboard or something like that. but this one looks better.
thanks for the comment! I always prefer frontal shots
you post this at the right time . I was looking for this . big thank you!
you´re welcome!
such clear analysis and explanation, thank you!
thanks! glad you liked it. I think its a way deeper subject that could have been explained better but also wanted to explain it in simple terms!
The content of the video is very exciting
What rendering program did they use ? Those images are very good
It was really interesting and exact subject that I was searching for but all the examples are about the projects which has only one building and mostly a tall one but I'm working on a project in historical context which is located on a horizontal city with narrow streets and I have to design a group of buildings for my infill design. So I don't exactly know what to do for renderings' views.
glad you liked the video Zahra! You can check out the pages and links of each render artist, they used different kinds of buildings and projects in different settings, so maybe you can find the one that can work best as a reference.
@@ShowItBetter Thank you 🌻
This one has got me taking notes!! Great content! Thank you
amazing video ! the composition can truly make it or break it and those techniques are very useful
Absolutely! composition is king!
Hola, con qué herramienta logras esos bocetos rápidos que aparecen en el video? Pueden hacerse en illustrator?
hola! es con after effects
Great vid !! How do you edit you videos? Especially like Min 3.45
After Effects!
Thank you very much for your amazing contents keep it up, bro.
Glad you like them!
Thank you very much for your key......1000% work :)
thanks! glad you liked it
I have the same idea as you
❤❤❤
Very good thank you
Hey, thanks for watching 😎
Thank You
cheers!
thank you so much !!!!!!
You're welcome!
WORKING thx bro
yesssssssss
Maya tutorials
I dont know maya, sorry!
Like Miro? :)
I've never used Miro! But I guess?
Well done, impressive
thanks! glad you liked it!
Well
well well well...