A better argument would be: your only light shouldn’t be a WML. If you only have one flashlight, then make it a handheld. In other words, a WML doesn’t replace a handheld, but that doesn’t make WML’s useless, either.
@theunknownknowsBYvoivod Yes, it is. What does surprise me is that there's so much of it amongst MACs viewers. Maybe it's just a bunch of KH or WC fans who found this in their feed today? If that's the case, then it makes perfect sense.
Exactly. There are so many excellent pocket-sized flashlights out there that there's no reason not to have one on you at all times. A WML is a specific piece of kit meant for a specific use.
He went full Fudd. "When's the last time you needed that?" I've never needed to use any firearm in self-defense, but that doesn't mean I'm going to stop carrying one.
What he meant is that if lacking on a camping trip. When is the last time you honestly used a trenching tool on your overnight camping with your kids? Same thing. Save weight by leaving at home thungsnyiure. Ever gonna actually use.
@Hattiesburg9333 I've used one on every camping trip to dig my fire pit. What's your point? Where did he say anything about camping? What does that have to do with anything being discussed here? WMLs have become so small that the weight is negligible.
*I love the stupid kids nowadays. Someone older than you says something? They must be an old stupid person!* Do you know what the fun thing is about being an old stupid person? You got old because you really were not stupid. And we enjoy watching smug young people make mistakes. Sometimes a reset needs to occur. Sometimes the reset is funny.
@@eriggle83oh my. Didn't do well in school? The point is, and I'll keep it simple for you is that you should carry the gear you will likely need and not carry gear that you've never needed and are unlikely to. Sort of that "yeah, I always keep a gas mask handy because the refinery twenty miles away may explode" attitude.
When is the last time you actually needed the sidearm? By the logic he used, “if you haven’t needed it, you don’t need it” you’ll never need to carry in the first place.
@@robertsears46 You're high. More people use their weapon light LARPing about their house and fucking around with their gun than use their weapon. There's no good reason as to why you wouldn't have a light. Police, CIA, FBI, etc. have all used flashlights along with their sidearms for decades, the fact that you can mount it to the underside rail doesn't make it less effective. The idea that you're somehow adding bulk and complexity via pistol light is also idiotic - it's less complex than the janky holding techniques taught by Hackborn in his DVDs.
Here is how having a light on my pistol saved someone's life and save me from a mess. Woke up to someone in my room at 2am. Grabbed my gun off the night stand and beamed him with the light. First thing I noticed was no weapon and he was dressed nice. Told him to stop and put his hands where I could see them and held him until the cops showed up. Turns out he was a drunk college kid that used to rent the same house. Got drunk and thought he was home. Having a little on my gun saved his life.
Though would it have been much different if you had just turned on a bedside lamp? The thing about pointing flashlights (especially high power ones) is you flashbang yourself when shone at a mirror or even the glass of a window or large framed picture. And especially if you're not 100% (like literally just woken up) you can mistakenly think a flashlight is being aimed at you when it's just a reflection, you don't get much context to recognize your own reflection it's just a blinding point of light. You don't have that problem turning on the light like normal. Also it's a problem that all the intruder can see is a flashlight, you're not having any deterrent effect of displaying a firearm, a drunk who is more violent may just think he's being irritated by a guy trying to dazzle him with a bright light and is not deterred from attacking but instead - illegitimately - takes it as provocation. Illumination is very important but you need to be realistic about what is the best use of resources around you. What if it was a cop? Maybe he shouldn't have been there, maybe he found the drunk outside with the door open and mistakenly believed the drunk when he said it was his house so when the drunk invites the cop into "his house" the cop strolls in totally not expecting to find you in your bedroom and what does he see? A guy whooping out a pistol with a WML and aiming it at him. He's liable to shoot you. I know it's not very "tactical" to illuminate yourself by just turning on the lights, but you're not clearing out caves in the mountains of Afghanistan. This is a civilian peacetime situation. For practical considerations, you might want to consider laying all your cards on the table and calling their bluff, you're in your own home, you should be able to stack the deck in your favor without having to resort to subterfuge of hiding in the dark while they're blinded in the light. Am I overthinking this? You may not like to overthink things but if you end up in court no one will be able to convince a jury "guys, don't overthink this" and by then it will be way too late to really think about it. When you're in court it will be presented as "how could you have not thought of this, it's obvious".
I live in south Africa where we have between 6 and 18 hours a day with no electricity. I sometimes need a weapons light because my surroundings can be very dark . I also have a light that I use that is not attached to my gun
@@DocMitchell69 well, fair enough, I didn't provide any argumentation. LE/Military go after the target. That's their job description. So they need tools to do that. Also, they work in teams, so tactics are different. Civilians are only required - and allowed! - to defend against an immediate threat. If it's so dark you can't see the threat, the threat can't see you. You don't go after him, you disengage. In your own house, where you cannot disengage, you know where the light switch is.
@@JJheadcharge I'm going to take it you're being sarcastic because using a flamethrower in a house. Is pretty darn stupid. **Using it somebody else's house that's criminal and a shootable offense.
@@kirkchartier7141 I'm going to take it you're playing dumb, because if this were a serious take, straw-manning an argument is an incredibly weak position to take. Especially since straw is highly flammable, and you are arguing with a flamethrower... one might call THAT stupid.
@@smtbigelow I am the ONLY one NOT trolling and being a FUDD. You are trolling and being a FUDD like everyone else that things weapon lights are a good thing.
Actually a fire blanket makes much more sense to keep for small fires especially in the kitchen. Fire extinguisher is to carve yourself an exit route if you are encircled, so keep an extinguisher in your bedroom, fire blanket in the kitchen
The problem with using a WML to do that is you have to point a gun at someone before you've distinguished whether they are friend or foe. So you need an independent light source and to use that first. And when the threat isn't present you need to switch back to that independent light source, you can't wave your gun around everywhere sweeping with the light.
If you cannot tell if someone is “friend or foe” then you should not be drawing your gun, and you sure as Hell shouldn’t be pointing a loaded gun at an unidentified target, Alec Baldwin.
I remember looking at lighting advice in gun magazines 30+ years ago, they advised holding the flashlight out sideways so as to draw fire towards the beam and away from your body.
A weapon mounted light is a weapon light, not a utility light. I've carried CCW with and without a pistol light, and I have trained with both. My home defense rifle has a light and optic. I haven't made the move to red dots on pistols yet because I am more comfortable with the sights. Use the gear you are comfortable with. Keep up the good work.
Definitely agree here. I went with a laser for close and scope for distance. Handgun, I use a bright flashlight and standard enhanced sights. Personally I just don't like using my gun as a search light 😂
I can't envision myself ever moving to a pistol RDS. Certainly didn't help out the genious acorn cop hit his target. Which is a good thing in that case.
You’re not gonna just become comfortable with red dots. You got to take the plunge and get to training. Only once you figure it out will you see how much better it is.
@@TheGeorgianGuynope. Been to the trainings and I'm also an instructor. Do pistol dots provide a significant advantage to a competent shooter in 99% of a shooting he's likely to face? ABSOLUTELY NOT; not even in law enforcement. Will it distract a mediocre or poor shooter from training fundamentals? Every single time. Every single damn time. Is it an extra piece of gear to maintain? Yes. Does it make a firearm harder to conceal? Yes. Do pistol dots assist a highly competent or extremely well-trained shooter perform better on qualifications courses or in flat-range competitions? Yep. Is it one more profit center for an optics company? Oh boy howdy, yes indeed.
For home defense, my 2 cents is a light is needed to positively identify someone at night. Your teenager might have snuck out for a party and is sneaking back in, etc.
Since the advent of blue LEDs my house has unfortunately never been dark enough that I need lights. You don't have ANY electronics in your house? Your house is dead pitch black at night?
Yeah martian... that little.blue light will instantly tell you if it's your son or a stranger at the door as you wipe away the night crumbs from your eyes and try to peer into to the darkness. Your comments on this thread clearly identify you as an anti-2A shill who has most likely never held a gun or has never trained even once in a force on force encounter! It's your 1A right to say what you want. And it's our right to shake our head and see your stupidity.
"When's the last time you needed a gun attachment?" When's the last time you needed a gun? It's not about "need", it's about "want for its advantages in the right circumstances"
RDS and WMS are not necessary on an EDC, on a nightstandgun sure. If you need a light, what are you gonna do, pull a your weapon and point it to light up something or someone? Pocket lights just makes more sense and are more useful. You can light up anything safely and not risk pointing your weapon for no reason. You clearly drew your weapon, if adked in a court of law you would have to say, I drew my weapon. Hand held pocket lights just make better sense for EDC. YOU can directly illuminate someone and still have your hand on your weapon. Onve anyone gets lit up by a light thay wince, this gives you a time advantage. If you light them up and it isn't a threat, you never drew your weapon. As for RDS, he stated 10 yards and in they make no difference. That's true. As for needing something... Do you tow a spare vehicle behind your vehicle, just in case??? No. That's the point he made with EDC , not nightstand guns. Never understood making a EDC bigger and heavier. Just being honest. Carry what you want .
@@shepleonard8695 What kind of yuppie buys a pistol for CC, and an entirely separate one for home defense? That's like $1k for a gun and range time/ammo that's way less effective than just using a long gun in the home, and a pistol for CC. Or just a CC pistol.
Alot of people do this. Ive got guns in ever one of my cars and trucks. Shooting is shooting. Nothing changes from a 9mm 1911 to a 9mm Sig 365, baducs are basics. And it's more like $2500. @userequaltoNull
Ken is a very good shooter, and has a wealth of knowledge and real world experience. With that being said. I'm an old man too. So it's not an age thing, it's a stubborn thing. I recently got a red dot for a pistol and let me tell you, it was an absolute game changer, I'm dinging 3 inches at 25 yards, which I couldn't do before. I've had a light on most of my guns for at least 10 years. So I don't know exactly what he's on about except that if it was good enough for dad it's good enough for me mentality.
Okay but be honest how often have you ever used your weapon mounted light against a threat though? The chances of you needing to draw your firearm on someone is not zero but it’s not very high either. And in those times that you did or would have to draw your weapon on someone, did you ever use the light or do you think you would need the light? Or would you even remember to turn the light on in those tense brief moments? Probably not. A separate hand held flash light though is a different story and a must. If you have to point your weapon at someone before you are able to identify if that someone is a threat then you may as well be the threat. So with that in mind we can summarize the situations when you would need a gun mounted light is; 1)when you already know for sure that the threat is indeed a threat, 2) that threat is not directly in front of you right now but is hiding somewhere with very poor illumination in a defensive manner waiting for you to move towards him, and 3) you have no choice but to move into that dark place and secure it immediately. Unless you are clearing houses with the SWAT team on a regular basis I honestly can’t think of a self defense situation where you would need to use your weapon mounted light. And on the off chance you do find yourself in such a situation which fits all 3 of those criteria, it’s not actually an immediate threat right in front of your face, so just call the cops and wait outside lol. And I’d like to point out your red dot uses were useful for plinking targets at extended range but if you ever needed to draw your EDC in self defense situation its not likely you would need the red dot or even have time to use it. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure it way more fun to shoot with a red dot. It’s just that you are not likely to use it in a real life civilian self defense situation, at least not one you could convince a jury was self defense.
@@tawan5753 I typed up the following out of respect for you. I normally don't debate online. and I don't mean to sound rude, but your three paragraphs is full of a lot of ignorance or maybe just not having the knowledge. I mean that with no disrespect. I've used my WML countless number of times . You then pose what if's for a WML. The whole point is to decide and see your target, if I shine a handheld on him/her and they have a gun up, I'm toast...it speeds up your OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) loop, so you're not fumbling for a light switch, button, etc and now they're outside your OODA and have the drop on you. Now granted there is much training that is involved with a WML. Dangers such as back lighting, spot lighting, and shadowing. Which can be mitigated with proper training. Such as STOP LISTEN MOVE cover concealment, with the light off. So as not to give away position, I could write a book on WML. Now when you bring up the red dot. If you're having to spend time acquiring your red dot. You need to train more. It should be just as much second nature as acquiring your front sight. Now if you're referring to point shooting, then it's a moot point and your target is within 7-5 yards. If that's not what you meant, then I'll turn you on to the now famous..."dickens drill". Look up the story. Discounting a red dot in an EDC situation is just close minded. It sounds like you haven't used one or aren't used to it because You say "ever needed to draw your EDC in self defense situation its not likely you would need the red dot or even have time to use it." you do know it stays on right? You don't need to hit any buttons....Its there. Like your irons. I co-witness mine in case the sight does go down, the battery life is usually 2 - 5 years depending on brand. It's a valuable tool that may even help you mitigate errant shots, let you be the first shot on target, and live through your unfortunate encounter. I'll add you also say " you have no choice but to move into that dark place and secure it immediately. Unless you are clearing houses with the SWAT team on a regular basis I honestly can’t think of a self defense situation where you would need to use your weapon mounted light" You've never had to clear your house after a bump in the night? Turning on lights, gives you away among many other things I could go on about, such as see inside, no, see outside not inside...if somethings outside....otherwise You just gave all advantage to a potential deadly threat.....Anyway.... Hope this clears some things up.
I think everyone is blowing this out of proportion. The point of the discussion is people are so focused on buying tactical stuff vs buying and and practicing
I definitely agree with you 100%, but with great power , comes great responsibility. Its because who Ken to the tactical world as to why this is such a big deal. He very well could be putting peoples lives at risk.
I agree with training with the gear you own. Having said that, there is nothing wrong with having a light on your carry pistol. If you never need it, consider it insurance. If you do need it and don’t have it, you are screwed. It’s not as though we’re talking IR Illuminator/ laser on there, along with a bipod. He’s out of line on this one…
The message I got from watching that Ken Hakathorn video was not that he said you should not have WML's. But they are not as necessary as all the tacticool fudd's are saying. Generally as a defender if you need a WML you probably needed a flash light first then you identified that there is a threat and pulled your weapon. Also you are going to learn to shoot one handed anyways and people have trained to be very effective with one handed shooting for a very long time. So it's possible that a basic minimal EDC combination fine and that you should get to the range and buy practice and training.
@@luckymanham302 yea but general if you need a WML you needed a flashlight fist and since you already got one. Why not just practice shooting with that
There's a perfectly good answer, don't use your wml to identify people, that's called threatening. Use a handheld. If someone were to point there gun at me to make sure that I'm not a threat the first thing I'm doing is calling the police on this idiot. We'll see how the law sees it.
I'm in an apartment in a busy suburb. Kinda short on windows, so it can get dark inside. When a storm knocks out power (which is unheard of in Florida, I know, but), the suburbs are pretty damned dark, too. Can't have too many lights.
@@bobbyberry5559agree, but it’s good to have a light with a dim and bright setting. I have light colored painted walls in my house, with some ultra bright light, if someone puts their foot through my door and I have to wake up, get up, grab my gun, a good way to blind yourself is have a light that is too bright.
Biggest problem I have had is holster selection. There just arent that many holsters with light options and those who do generally only cater to a couple of light manufacturers.
I watched the Wilson video when it first came out three weeks ago, but I did not draw the same inferences you did, so I revisited it before posting my response. Here's my takeaway. It's easy to cherry-pick Ken's comments to support your position, but it's better to consider them in their totality. Ken did not tell folks they did not need a light; he asked them when was the last time they needed it. Later in the video he said if you are going to use a light or red dot, you should train with them. He also covered the pros and cons of these add-ons. I'll quote his conclusion. "If you're willing to put the time in - and the effort - and I tell people, to me a red dot sight is like a 1911 designed pistol; it's an enthusiast's tool. It takes a higher level of skill and maintenance to keep it going. If you're in that lifestyle - if you accept them - then putting a red dot on your gun will make more sense. But if you're not willing to put the effort and the training and the trigger time in, I think it's probably a bad pursuit." I agree with Ken. Training is always the key. As for why you would have different configurations on your carry and bedside guns, I would say it's because they serve two different purposes that only you can determine. If you think this is a training and familiarization mistake, then I have to ask why do you use more than one type of handgun? Why do you rotate your carry options? Wouldn't a single, never changing setup be preferable?
Agreed. Concealment is critical (for comfort too). Anything that could snag, slow down draw speed, etc. I'm not interested in. A civilian defensive shooting is likely going to be fast and very close range. Don't need a light or optic on a CARRY pistol. If I need a light (e.g. dark alley) I probably already have a flashlight out and using it to guide my way. Home defense, different tool and analysis. You're not carrying it, not really worried about draw speed, would want a light in the event of power outage, etc.
It’s crazy to me how much the internet took this out of context. Do you need a light yes a gun mounted light nope. His opinion is still respected by shooters.
For the MAC channel, I have the utmost respect for you and the value you bring to shooters and the shooting industry. I worked at Silencer Shop for a time and got to meet you in person.........you even gave me the velcro emblem off your hat when I asked about how to get one. You are as genuine in person as your are on your on MAC. You truly set the standard of what experienced shooters and industry leaders need to be. Keep up the phenomnial work. THANK YOU!!
Well, that can depend on a lot of things. Regardless, once a deadly threat has been identified, you need to drop any light and get both hands on the gun and properly grip it, so it should have an integrated light of its own.
@@floridaman6138in my home state of ny, light on gun is deadly force. So even if the gun is unloaded, you are presenting deadly force using the light on it which means it better be pointing at something presenting deadly force
Followed Ken for decades. He’s not much older than me. I live out in the sticks with no liggts on poles on my property. I’ve had a few occasions where people entered our property and I approached them with a handheld light in one hand and my handgun in the other. First time I dealt with that situation was the last time I used a handheld. That night I ordered several lights for several of my home defense tools. The next time I had to approach someone it was with a mounted light and it was way more user friendly. I had way more control of my handgun having both hands on the weapon making for a much safer encounter. The 3 times I had to approach folks they drove 1/3 of a mile down a dirt road with multiple no trespassing/ private property signs. I took pictures of them and their tags as they turned around. Always use a mounted light.
Opinion of course. You had trouble with a handheld does not mean others will have the same trouble. Of course with a WML, you can aim to the left, right or up or down and still see what you need to.
@@winstonsmiths2449 I didn’t have trouble with a handheld. I’ve qualified multiple times on LEO course using handhelds. I just realized the disadvantages of a handheld over a WML. I always carry a high lumen edc light in my pocket and it sits next to my bedside at night. In the end it’s all personal preference and truth is no one way is the be all end all.
I agree that if one’s desires a WML than that is their choice. What I caution you to consider is that a light now reduces your night vision temporarily. Your light gives your position away if you are on your own familiar terrain. Next is the problem of Aggravated Assault when you point a deadly weapon at an individual who means you no harm like a lost traveler. His proof that you pointed a deadly weapon? Your weapon “mounted” light. They have their place but you must admit that they have their problems that one may not be able to legally overcome. Just my opinion.
@@omardevonlittle3817 You’re correct. It’s an opinion based on a few situations. What works for one person might not work for others. Hence all the changes in gun designs, the way one holds a gun, the type of stance one utilizes. There is no one method that is the answer.
The problem isn't lights. The problem is the dumbasses who don't use them correctly and are dangerous to those around them. Wherever you point your gun-mounted light, you're pointing your gun. I think that is the point Hackathorn was getting at. I know Paul Howe, who has a superior tactical mind than most, prefers and teaches hand held for that very reason.
@@kinch613 fair point, if it were just being left on drawing atrention. just made a great point why automatic grip/shake on lights are not ideal and better to have quick easy access. Sometimes ya just need to not draw attention to yourself.
@@michaels5210 Exactly bro. The whole "negative attention is still attention" is BS. All he's done is make people ask why Wilson is showing this guy still.
His comments make me stay away from Wilson Combat. Not to mention, there’s nothing worse for your reputation than saying dumb stuff that is blatantly wrong. Wilson claiming that you will ruin their pistols if you drop a slide on an empty chamber one in a while. That makes me not want one. Especially when other manufacturers say it’s ok on their 1911’s.
I do have a pistol light, but have often thought that turning it on at night in a gun fight would reveal your location and give your opponents something to shoot at.
Proper use of a light is something that requires a little training, just like anything else. There is a way to use a light that maximizes the benefits and reduces the risks.
@RickNethery So does a muzzle flash. Better than getting a light, is getting a light with so many lumens that you can see but they can't. Cops keep their headlights and flashers on during a road stop, not just for safety from drivers still on the road... it's an offensive perception deterrent to disorient any would be attackers from facing them. Same reason snipers keep the sun to their back if they can. Better to be behind the light than facing it. Just trying to give you some peace of mind, not being a critical jackass.
@murdurmuffin7872 Oh, I understand, and in the right environment, a light could be very useful. You would have to be smart about it, though. Hope that your muzzle flash is the last thing your enemy ever sees. 👍
I believe they're an essential addition to any defensive setup. A well-equipped handgun isn't just about accuracy; it's about preparedness for any scenario, including low-light situations where visibility is crucial. Lights not only aid in target identification but also serve as a deterrent. It's all about being ready for whatever comes your way.
Considering your handle I find it odd you put so much trust in things that run on electricity in an emergency. WML make poor shooters better at holding onto a piddly 9mm and red dots on pistols are for people who don't understand where the bullet goes when their sights are lined up(which you have to do to use a red dot in the first place if you even aim with sights). This armchair speculation in these comments section aren't from people who have done ANYTHING. Even our most venerated guntoobers aren't a bona-fide all pro daisy gardener. You think his experience goes out of the window because "times change" he's not arguing for people to carry a revolver, he's just speaking the truth.
@@outofrangetv2353 Because some of us live on rural acreage miles from cell service and when you investigate what has freaked out the herd and alerted the dogs at 3am you don't venture out with both hands in the air. Out here we are our own first responders. I have a WML for the same reason I have a trauma kit, night vision, fire extinguisher, and gmrs in the atv.
I'm a big fan of weapon mounted lights. Super handy when packing meat out after dark in bear country....they definitely have a place. I have red dots on handguns as well, but still undecided on how much I like them. I do know older folks like them more often than not... make the decisions on what works for you
@vicdiaz5180 but it doesn't blind the guy. It tells the guy shoot at the light. You cannot use the light to ID people because if it's an innocent person then you, as the gun owner, committed a crime.
@@Aelazadnemost lights over 300 lumens shined right in someone’s eyes will leave a huge after image in the center of their vision for at least 20 seconds. You use that 20 seconds to get off a shot, move off the X or find cover. The idea that somebody will shoot at the light in the second or two you have it on to ID them is ridiculous. This isn’t Die Hard…
Ken needs to realize that we all don’t go to bed a 6pm like he does. Some of us do go out at night and need a light to positively identify a threat and engage.
If you haven't positively identified whatever "it" is as a threat, you have absolutely no business pointing a weapon at "it" in the first place. Situational awareness > weapon features. When I go out in the city, I carry a small pistol with no extra shit on it for deep concealment, and a separate EDC light. If I need to see what that person crouched down by my car is, I can do that without pointing a weapon on it - and with my other hand on the weapon if the situation calls for it. If I need stabilization, I can do the old school police cross and shoot just fine. Maybe somebody dropped their keys, or had to tie their shoe. I don't want to find out by committing felonies. If I'm on my property I might have a full size pistol with a weapon light. But I'm also carrying a flashlight. I'll switch to the weapon light if the situation calls for it, and not before. If you have room for a weapon light, you have room for a flashlight. If you don't need a flashlight, you also don't need a weapon light.
Everyone needs to take a breath and read/listen to what Hackathorn actually said. “I think lights in today’s world are extremely overrated. Again, if it’s the gun on your nightstand, that’s different.” MAC actually misrepresents this immediately in the title of the video. The words “overrated” and “useless” are not synonyms. How many of you have a brand new, never used spare tire in your car? Or a brand new, never used fire extinguisher? How many of you have ever changed a flat tire or ever used a fire extinguisher? A shocking number of drivers don’t even know how to change a flat. Are fire extinguishers and spare tires “useless”? I’d say they are not useless. Are spare tires and fire extinguishers “overrated”? There is a very valid argument that these two items meet the definition of overrated. It’s still very acceptable to have both anyway. A majority of the discussion in MAC’s video and a majority of the comments here are talking about lights on nightstand/home defense guns and you’re all getting off in the weeds and not listening/comprehending what the guy actually said.
Well said. I would add a distinction to your point. A basic EDC gun is like a "doughnut" spare. Limited in capability, but compact and lightweight enough to always have with you. A gun with a light and laser is like a full-sized spare. Even better, but most of the time is more work to carry in your vehicle. All Ken is saying is that a full sized spare is not that important as long as you at least have a doughnut spare.
I'm old school I was a cop for over 30 years. I never had lights mounted on my weapon. I remember a female officer shoot a suspect my accident. She was using her weapon mounted light as a flash light. The man came out of a closet and surprised her she shot him...I made have done the same.
Ken has the right to his own opinion, and based on decades of experience, he may have a point that plain joes don't need one...but you can carry what ever makes you comfortable. Remember, if the threat is 10 + yards it may be hard to justify the potentially deadly force so you may as well run
I was actually in a situation that was REALLY close to a situation where a WML would have made a huge difference. If I'd been out of the tow truck a few seconds earlier, my pistol would have been out. Dropping a car in a not-great area at around 3 AM, some homeless guy approaches and gestures around and I catch a flash of something that looks like a knife in his hand. Me and the customer were still in the truck, so I just called the cops and let them handle it. But if the timing had been just a little different, the light on my carry gun would have been completely necessary. I did also have a hand-held light, but when speed matters, one draw.
Tim, I posted the following over on Colion Noir's video about the same subject. "I am an old "fudd" and a retired Army CID agent. One of the worst preconceived notions people have about LEOs is that they all know how to use a firearm and nothing could be further from the truth. Frankly, I am more uncomfortable around a LEO with a gun than I am around a civilian with a gun. Most LEOs carry a gun because [they have too] and most do only what they have to do so that they can carry the gun for the job. Civilians on the other hand are carrying because they want to, which results in more (not all) of them going to the range to practice and to seek training. I want to acknowledge that Ken has forgotten more about firearms that I have time left in life to learn about them, but despite all his knowledge he is not “all knowing.” Let’s take Ken’s logic to the next step. Most cops during a 25 year career will [never] pull their gun out of the holster in the line of duty. Is a cop carrying a gun on duty “overrated.” If I am wearing pants, then I am carrying a pocket light. Most of the time it just rides in my pocket, but when I need it, I need it now. Same with a carry gun. The possibility of me actually needing to use my carry gun is slim to none, but if I do need it, I am not going to be controlling the where or when it is needed. I don’t want to be handicapped by not having a gun, so why would I handicap the gun by not giving it all the capability it can have so that it can do what I need it to do, when I need it to do it? Bottom line, we need to listen and learn from people like Ken, but we should never discount what our own knowledge and training has taught us, and just accept what he says, just because it is him saying it. Especially, if we have had any experience that contradicts what he is saying. Apparently, Ken doesn’t go out at night, has never been in an unlit parking lot or in a public building when the lights have gone out. For the record, I have done or experienced all those things as an old retiree."
The problem with having a light attached to your firearm, is that you will use it as a flashlight. That is a natural response to identify what is around you in the dark. This can lead to "brandishing", which can lead to arrest, jail, attorney fees, seizure of your weapons, etc. It may lead to death or serious injury if you light up a cop! Check the laws in your states about "brandishing" and be aware of potential pitfalls.
Can we PLEASE get more of these podcast style videos? This is probably one of my favorite videos you have ever put out and I've been following you off and on for the last 13 years here on UA-cam.
I'm old enough to remember when Jeff Cooper was the Godfather of defensive pistol craft. I also remember his advice becoming dated. Ken is becoming Jeff Cooper.
True, very true. The only thing that is continuous is change. To stand on a hill of accomplishment and say this is the highest peak attainable means you have limited your knowledge and experience. To be fair, I do not think every pistol needs a light. A small ccw that has a low hit probability past 12 yards, well ok maybe not. It depends on the situation and your training. What’s coming up, well multiple threats in defense scenario was unlikely 30 years ago. Now, gang activity, Tangos, saboteurs are increasing in probability daily.
The light makes you a super easy target, until 2008 we trained military and police to keep a light away from your body, hold it away because people shoot for the light and your dead, in my profession I love the bad guys to have a light and make my job easy and quick. 50 years of training and still alive.
“Why would you have a different configuration?” Because I can’t concealed carry a full-size 10mm with a light & a dot every day, but I can have one in a quick access safe in the nightstand. Everything is a compromise: I CCW a naked P365 because any bigger/heavier and I won’t always have it with me.
When Ken and Paul (Howe) and especially Bill Wilson speak, I listen. I also have my own experience and can trust but verify what I know to what experts say. I’ll never discount the knowledge of guys like Ken but I also always take my own insights into account too.
Nah you gotta call out the stupidity and realize this guy is basing all these claims from his time he is way passed his time because by his argument why own anything at all since we don't use it at all times.
Me too. I THINK that's what he was talking about. He had to be more specific, and he used a bad example of the idiot using his WML as a regular flash light.
I understand what Mr. Hackathorn is saying, I believe. You hear a bump in the night, and you start clearing your house with a pistol with a light mounted on it. You come around a corner a there is someone standing in your living room. You light them up with your weapon mounted light and it's your teenage son or daughter sneaking back in the house! This means that you have your weapon pointed at your child and your only a few pounds of pressure away from taking out your child. Use a handheld light and don't shoot your kids.
You do you - great philosophy. Do what works for you, and let others do what works best for them. Be open to new technologies but don't adopt/ use them if they don't work for your needs. OUTSTANDING 😊
They're useful for home defense and rural defense where street or traffic lights aren't common. Bad part is that they can tell attacker exactly where to shoot outside and indoors it can possibly blind the user if the light bounces from the wall
Rarely does anyone consider that they may have to defend themselves with one hand/arm disabled. Pistol/light combo allows me to use both with a single hand. What if hypothetically you are carrying your child in one arm, or dragging someone to safety… pistol/light combo handy?
Do you know what a light is for? When was the last time you were in such utter complete darkness, you needed a flashlight to make out faint details? I literally cannot remember it EVER being that dark, except when I took exceptional acts to make it dark, like a photo darkroom.
@@robertsears46Well...not really. It is often dark when I take out the garbage. If I hear something I use my handheld light and then may pull my pistol if I see an animal. I would never pull my pistol to just use the flashlight.
@@KretikosThen the same could be said about your edc flashlight. If you rarely ever need or use it, then by your reasoning, you shouldn't have it all. Obviously you carry it for "what if" scenarios as well.
Walking the dogs in a conversation trail later than I should have been out. The sun went down and I started to hear noises in the woods surrounding me as I made my way out of the trails. The first thought I had was, "I really wish I had a weapon light to see what the fuck that was." All my handguns now have weapon lights.
@@Gieszkanne Maybe you missed the part about being in conservation land, no one around, on trails? Frank isn't coming stomping out of the woods towards me at night, and if he is, Frank getting shot.
So you are going to muzzle sweep innocents on the trail? That is what a handheld lite is for. My handheld is on my body when I am awake. It will temporarily blind a perp with ill intentions if need be. Tell me how much you like your lite when you're appearing before a judge for brandishing a weapon.
The key premise of Hackathorn's view is that "when was last time you needed that [weapon light]?" The fallacy here is that he is referring to non-LE civilians. So my question is when was the last time his target audience needed their weapon for defense? Zero? Then by his logic, they should not even be carrying a weapon.
Thankfully, I've never had to use my pea shooter. Using the same 'when's the last time you used it' statement, I shouldn't carry my pea shooter any longer. Fudd Lord Ken, 💯. Absolutisms do not exist in our modern world. Watching/listening to Ken's rant is wild.
Ken is showing his background, and opinion. Period. Myself? In the house at night, I use a handheld vs a mounted light. 5 kids make me more cautious. I practice those techniques. When I hit the woodline, or think something is raiding the chicken coop, 12 GA. slug gun with a light. Old grunt that still uses the phrase, situation dictates. All this is still a personal thing. Oh, your opinion on weapon differences. What I carry is what I carry. ALL the time. I do not try to tell others what they should or shouldn't do, unless it's clearly unsafe.
I had a very recent experience which made me believe a weapon light is a great idea. I live in very rural Oklahoma. Both my son and I were fishing under a bridge on the Arkansas river where there are only cow fields between Coweta and Haskel OK. It had gotten dark and we packed up to head home. When we walked up the embankment there were 3 homeless men sandwiching 10 feet of my truck !!!! We are in the country! Never thought this would be a thing. It was dark, when they saw us the men kinda backed off and acted like nothing was going on. Would not make eye contact. I carry. I have a red dot. Shoot very regularly, retired military and active member is a Tulsa gun club. I for some reason never really thought of having a light on my carry gun. I have it on my nightstand gun because you need to see the threat and what is going on to be safe. This situation made me rethink the light on my carry. What if those men thad other ideas like robbing or hurting us!!!! I would have been at an extreme disadvantage with the very low light as far as identifying threats!! Maybe they saw me an a very large 6,2 weight lifter, football, wrestler high schooler walk up the hill and decided, not as easy as it could have been. I don’t know. It spooked me. Not sure if I could have been accurate or safe without being able to visualize the threat without a light of some kind. I now have ordered a light and new holster for my carry gun. Luckily they just kind of slipped more under the bridge and nothing happened. My truck was locked and nothing in the bed, and most importantly I didn’t have to draw my weapon! and my son and I left safely.
what about animals, you get home its dark, and hear a growl sneak up behind you, you take out your edc, turn on the light and see a predator run away from seeing the light. I absolutely feel more safe with a mounted light.
I can understand why you would think you don’t need a flashlight on a conceal carry gun. If you’re drawing that you’ve already identified a threat and the goal is to get out of the situation.
Low light conditions happen and you can better placed shots when you can actually see your target and what’s behind your target before you shoot with a flashlight
Notice how he didn't say anything about tritium night sights? Most people insist on tritium night sights on their carry gun... what good are glow in the dark night sights that only work when it is too dark to ID your target? I'll take a weapon light and standard sights any day over just night sights.
Back in the day when they were becoming popular, they were mostly used for an advantage in low light situations to be able to pick up the sights quicker, like a parking garage.
If I recall correctly, he is specifically talking about a concealled carry handgun, not rifles, not pistols for home defense, he has specifically mentioned that in that or other videos. I think the point being made was unless you work at night or are likely to be out and about at night, the vast majority of people probably aren't going to need that light on their concealed carry firearm. The added weight and bulk can be pointless when most people stop carrying guns because they are too big as it is. If your waistband can hold an AR15 then do it. But it doesn't and people struggle as it is with even the smallest guns to want to carry. And I agree somewhat, adding a lot of capability and complexity to a device that you are only most likely going to use within 7 yards (outside the home with a CC pistol). I think they stress the point that you should plan for the probable and not the wildcard or the extreme. But this is only applying to a concealed carry pistol AFAIK. And same with the red dot. For something you may likely be point shooting or shooting without really aiming that much a dot does not actually offer anything over irons. Shots at longer distance are to be rare, and if you want to carry a dot and a light for those 1% chances then thats fine, but carry is every day and I think the point was is that really needed, is the added bulk and complexity of failure worth it? Just to reiterate that this is only in regards to carrying a small carry pistol when outside the home, I am pretty sure he never said not to have a light on your home defense gun or go to war gun, he has said a light on the home gun is needed 100%. People just aren't watching the full video or series. Maybe I got it wrong and he is saying that but that is what I got from those videos. Thoughts and theories on are they really needed or not in all situations basically.
He said it you're not military or LE, you don't need it. And his example of stupid use was of a cop doing very a very stupid thing. You're introducing a wall of nuance into something that was not very nuanced.
@@bryanpeters5034I must have heard him mention it in a previous episode, maybe he wasnt clear on that, because I specifically remember him saying for home defense its a must. I think the point is, if he is arguing against using it its because it takes up space and weight, a home defense gun it does not matter its size or weight. Therefore he is talking about a carry gun for defense. Point being, you should be retreating out of the area and not moving forward towards the threat to search for them like Military or LE would. Of course you need a light on your home defense gun, because why not? It is not impacted by size or weight like a carry gun is.
I’m with you- I heard “don’t need” and “over-rated.” The only time I heard “useless,” was in the commentary. As to what he actually “said”…I’m sorry but unless someone can show me a considerable amount of self defense shootings in which an attached light was used, then ol Uncle Hack seems to be right…”when was the last time it was needed?” That’s what he said…as for overrated…take a pistol with an optic and attached light- ask yourself, “what’s the one thing that can fail but still make the firearm effective?” 🤔 yeah…the light! Probably have another source I can use on the rare occasion I’d really need it…making the firearm still effective AF….hence…”over-rated.” Also, that light can give your position away. Bad guys don’t need to properly ID a target…there are some occasions in which I’d “prefer” a separate light…again…”overrated.” Uncle Hack is 100% right boys…try not to lose sleep over it 😜
@@leftyo9589 He didn’t say, “Don’t carry an attached light…” he didn’t even say “useless” like this title says…The only people that are suggesting that, are the people “saying” what “he said…” for clicks. Funny how you tube is falling into the same trap as the big network news now…it’s all about the money. Even for UA-camrs…
He is exactly right! In the civilian world a light , Red dot sight inc is not needed. Name me a single place where one would be in a place so dark that you can see someone attacking you? ( of and using a WML to see if person is a threat or not and it turns out that they are not , is called assault by pointing a weapon). Remember you don’t have the same responsibility as law enforcement or military, you are not required to actively search for suspects or the enemy, clear houses cars inc. you are reacting to an immediate threat. If it’s so dark that you can’t see the threat then the threat can see you. As to red dots. The distance that civilian self defense situation ( not in home defense where a light would be an advantage )that place is measured in feet not yards so the red dot has no real advantage over iron sights. That’s the actual facts, but people will get butt hurt over hearing the truth.
@@captaintripps935 That situation isn’t anything like he was discussing! It has nothing with carrying a concealed weapon for personal defense against humans. Hell in that situation you could carry a shotgun with a weapon mounted light and light up all the bears you want without committing a crime!
@@americanpatriot477 It's methhead country, too, bud. And no appeal to authority is going to convince me not to use appropriate and proven tools available to me. Wilson Combat should stick to making 1911s feed truncated cone and cut the gatekeeping excrement.
I agree, you do you. And maybe you mentioned it and I missed it, but you NEVER point a weapon at what you don’t intend to harm, it’s very easy to use a light to illuminate your target or threat, but you’re now pointing a loaded weapon at that target/threat, and that may be a family member or innocent person. Yup, I’m an old guy, and my eyes pick up a front sight more easily than a red dot, to each their own.
Ken doesnt realize that in combat we dont white light in gunfights. We have nightvision for that. White light is for after the gunfight is over amd we are checking enemy bodies for intel and signs of life.
To me uts about pointing a loaded weapon at someone that might not be a threat. If so and the threat is just a guy walking to the vehicle next to yours in a dark parking lot then guess what? If he decides to call the police then you just caught a charge for terroristic threatening with a firearm and you will loose your rights. Carry a handheld. In your home I would say the same thing.
Hackathorn is remarkably..... Right no name calling. Okay so I know of two times where the person with a gun wishes they had a weapons light... I will only recount the situation that resulted in a fatality. So my wifes, best friends brother and aunt lived in a mobile home together. She goes out to the local pub and loses her keys... Gets a ride home and since it is very late and he has to work in the morning she decides she will crawl through the window. He wakes up in the middle of the night to someone breaking in and crawling through a window in a room where the light doesn't work... She is no longer with us and he has never been mentally right for over 20 years. Many things he might have done different sure but a light on the weapon almost certainly saves her life. True in the other scenario. So a lot of people come to me that are asking questions about firearms and I insist have a light on your weapon.... My EDC carry selection all have a light. I have a P365 with a TLR-6, a Glock 19 with an Olight PL mini and even a Ruger micro 380 LCP II with a light.... None have a red dot yet because I am the only income in my family but they will. Yes people do stupid things with lights and lasers.... or guns period... In my estimation not having a light borders on stupid.... Okay a bit of criticism on lights... have a tactical light with you when possible. If your weapons light sticks out past your gun to any significant degree this makes no sense then carry a bigger gun. Buying the smallest lightest easy to carry pistol and making it more bulky than Glock 17 makes me shake my head in disbelief. Thanks for the video guys, Ken Hackathorn deserves every bit of flack he gets....
I personally believe, like any other tool, it all depends on the applications said tool might be used. I personally just use a handheld light in conjunction with my CCW. That's just me. At the end of the day, carry what you want, train with your loadout(s), and become proficient.
I'm a fudd & I'm proud of it! No dots/lights on my pistol! It seams like the dot/ light crowd is so defensive, that they are trying to convince themselves that dots/lights are cool. Back in the day gunsluts wrote for gun rags. Today gunsluts are called influencers! Anybody on pewtub can be an influencer. Technology might have improved, but the gunfight has remained the same!
Since I am older than dirt, I was taught that on my first LEO job. We even shot at 50 yards with one hand with a 4" barrel revolver as part of our qualification. At least they let us use our strong hand for that part.
What is truely interesting here is why are people freaking out about it? It is one mans response and his standpoint. If you do not agree go on about your day and do what works for you. Why all this fuss about it?
That man in the video is extremely wrong. I can't even comprehend how such a person in this industry would say such a thing. Not only you can blind a person with it, but it comes extremely handy in low-light situations. Why would you, not a have a light when they are the cheapest way to see in the night or low light areas. That guy seems to be an extreme fudd.
When's the last time you needed that? I've never needed a gun to stop an attack. I've never needed car insurance. I've never needed home insurance. I've never needed snow tires. I've never needed a fire extinguisher. I've never needed a hard hat. What a stupid thing to say.
I really do respect and appreciate the advice and opinion of experienced people like Ken Hackathorn, but at the end of the day, you have to do whatever fits your needs. Don't let anyone shame you for what fits you. Train well and stay safe America.
At the end of the day we are all entitled to our own opinions. I may not agree with the opinions of others but I don’t take it personal. I definitely don’t think that name calling is going to change Ken’s opinion. Also Ken’s opinion is not going to change my opinions. Don’t take it personal and keep it moving. Live your life.
This is an interesting discussion, and frankly I think a big part of the problem is that everyone takes discussions on the internet way too seriously, and over-reacts to opinions they don't like. For instance, KH's comments aren't new. He's said more or less the same thing in the past, and Massad Ayoub has expressed a similar opinion, especially regarding red dots. Full disclosure: I've only ever held a gun with a red dot on it once. I'm poor, and California's laws regarding handguns make mounting a red dot on a handgun very difficult (except if you're exempt) so those of us who are poor are essentially forced into the "gun Amish" community, as the Active Self Protection guy refers to us. Lights on a handgun we can do, but it's my impression that the ASP guy mirrors KH's opinion, civilians don't need them. One of the things that amuses me about this discussion is that I didn't take KH's comments as an insult, even though it wasn't aimed at me (given I don't have an optic or a light on my gun). The guy to the left (sorry I don't know names here) talks about "clearing his house" if he hears a bump in the night. My first reaction, if I hear a bump in the night, is to hunker down, call the cops, and await their arrival. Sure I'll have a gun in my hand as I wait, but I'm not going to leave my defensive location, unless someone sets the place on fire. I live alone and don't have a pet (might get a cat, they tend to be low maintenance) so if there's a bump in the night it's hostile or the wind, something like that. However, if you live with a family, are you going to "clear the house" with a weapon-mounted light, shining it into every room in your house looking for your loved ones? Like I said, I live alone, but if I had a family I doubt I'd be looking for them with a *weapon-mounted* light, and pointing the gun at a potential family member, until I illuminate them. Not sure how this works (maybe it's my lack of training) but that would seem counter-productive to me. Soldiers and cops, clearing houses of hostiles or drug dealers or whatever, it makes more sense... By the way, I do have a separate objection to weapon-mounted lights, even when they're issued to cops. There have been two incidents within the last year or so where cops confronted a homeowner in the middle of the night for some reason, and the homeowner had a gun in his hand. The cop shines his light in the person's eyes to "get a tactical advantage" and not only does the homeowner blink, he raises his hands, one of which is holding a gun, to shield his eyes...whereupon the cop shoots him because he raised the gun. You can talk about training all you want, but not all of us are 13th level ninjas who react in trained and highly competent ways to random startling stimuli with cat-like reflexes. In the one case the guy got shot, and he's lying on the floor in the entryway to his house yelling at his wife that he's been shot, and she should call the cops...and the cop who shot him is saying that he IS the cops. That was due to a false silent alarm somehow being triggered. In the other case the cops were literally at the wrong address, and there they killed the homeowner, and his wife fired back at them. She wasn't charged, and I think in both cases the families in question are going to get settlements from the municipalities in question. So as to the question of training: I think there needs to be a lot more of that, and it needs to take into account that when a cop confronts someone with a handgun, that person might not have the high-level training to have a light shined in his eyes without reacting.
"gun Amish" 😆😆 And I appreciate your saying being "poor". I read that as "average, the common folk, most of people". Most of us don't have or should not be spending that kind of money on accessories that cost almost as much as or sometimes more than the firearm itself. It's ridiculous the way they act like it's nothing. 👍🏼🤟🏼🙏🏼
Anyone on here has to go watch the full video on Wilson Combat and not just the clip. The context of the entire conversation is important. The TLDR for the full video is don’t chase deficiencies in training by trying to supplement it with equipment. In the full video he doesn’t say citizens shouldn’t have lights. He even says he has a light on his home defense pistol. His point is most people aren’t going to get adequate training to know when and how to properly employ the weapon mounted light.
Tone & Context matters, when you start off with a statement like is in the video, it is gonna blow up in your face, I still think Ken is the real deal, he has had a long career teaching, but this tone was really bad and I lost some respect for the man.
"do you actually need that" is a very relevant question that is not presented enough today. To many of us are just taking the word of influencers and marketing and not actually identifying what our basic equipment and skills are first before getting into the nice to have. The ones that come to mind for me are the folks that are always chasing what is "hot" and not focusing on refining what they have.
It's fine to have a red dot (RDS) on a weapon and a weapon light. For the love of God, though, carry a handheld light (or more than one) and use that for general illumination tasks. Know the laws in your state. In some states, unholstering and pointing a loaded, ready-to-fire pistol at someone is felony assault - whether you're just using the light or not. I'm guessing that was a point Ken tried to make (rather poorly). He's buds with Mas Ayoob, who I've seen stress that point more eloquently. Use whatever makes you a more effective shooter. Just know the legal ramifications of lighting up someone with a weapon light in your state... and carry a handheld light.
I moved to another LE agency that would not allow me to carry my 1911. I was issued a Glock 22 40 caliber. When I placed a light on this pistol it sucked up a lot of recoil making the pistol easier to shoot. That's another reason for a light. I believe Ken Hackathorn criticized appendix carry. With the back problems I have. Appendix is the most pain free way I can carry concealed
I like Ken’s commentary but I think he was wrong here. However, I believe that too much emphasis is on a weapon held light and not using a flashlight first. I my training, weapon lights are secondary, your pocket flashlight is primary. The last thing you want to do is search with a weapon light. If you light someone up and they were not a threat, you just pointed your gun at them. That is very bad. If you had a hand held, no one is in danger of getting shot. Handheld first and learn how to shoot with it and practice. Once you got that, Then worry about a weapon mounted light.
I’m gonna take what he said in the beginning: civilian carry. Meaning CCW. Not a home defense weapon. In CCW cases, how long from draw from Holster to first shot? From a lot of the videos out there, it is too short to even activate a light. Home defense weapon where you are searching your house, that’s a different story. Hence his caveat of not police/military. They need it for searching.
I'm under the mindset of its better to have it and not need it, then need it and not have it, I have a wl, dot on my hand gun, but I also carry a hand held light to illuminate something with muzzling it, just my 2 cents
I think the point he was trying to make was whatever you have learn to use it properly and that you need to set up your firearms and and your gear in a way that works for you not against you. Their are fundamentals and techniques for even using a flashlight. I'm not sure if he was being condescending saying kids nowadays but I do know I'm terrible for trying to say something and it comes out completely wrong.
I think it's entirely dependent on the end user. Personally, I live in a big city with decently lit streets, so at most I carry a handheld for PID or if I need to see better, and keep my firearm bare. But everyone may not live in an area with decent lighting, some people may own property or live in the country. Others may not have the best eyesight and prefer a red dot. It's entirely dependent on the user. For bag/truck guns, home defense, or long guns, I think it's a completely different story. He was specifically referring to handguns for concealed carry, but (since it was brought up) I think in the instance outside of concealed carry, it makes a lot of sense. If a situation has escalated to the point where I've escalated from a concealed handgun to a a bag/truck gun, home defense gun, or long gun, I absolutely want whatever red dots, lights, and lasers that will help me put rounds on target as quickly as possible.
Here's the problem with weapon mounted lights: In order to see what it is in the dark, you need to flag it with the barrel of your weapon. That's a no-no. Never point your weapon at something you're not willing to destroy, and always know your target (and what's behind it) before you aim. That's two cardinal rules of firearm ownership broken with one device.
Strangely, and sadly, the biggest haters of the 2A community are other 2A community members. Why? If you want a plate carrier etc., go for it! If you want a hipoint, wpn light, handgun gas pedal etc., go for it! For the love of God, stop hating on those who don’t do exactly what “you” do!
Years ago the leading narrative was, you need a laser and nite sites on your .40 s&w pistol. There are cycles in advertising for guns and gun accessories, and the current narrative is you must have a red dot and a light on your micro 9mm or full size 10mm and a hi-viz front sight.
The "leading narrative" isn't always an advertising gimmick. Sometimes they're born out of actual innovation. A laser sight is an improvement that gives you a point of aim for every scenario where you can't pull your gun up to eye level, which is highly likely if you're being assaulted. Night sights are an improvement to standard sights for low light encounters, but they still work during the day too, so you've lost nothing by using them. A red dot gives you a single point of aim to acquire and allows you to stay target focused under stress, instead of having to line up both windage and elevation on your target while taking eyes off the threat to focus on your front iron sight High viz front sight helps some iron sight users acquire their sight picture faster, again you've lost nothing by using them. Lights speak for themselves, whether you ever have to use it or not, some people want the option. A lot of people simply reject change and decide that the way they've always done something is the best, which may be true for them but not everyone. I've recently discovered that a red dot is one of the most valuable things that I thought I'd never use.
If his arguments were consistent (which they aren’t) then that would be the logical conclusion. I’m glad I’m not the only one that noticed his contradictions and laughable reasoning.
A better argument would be: your only light shouldn’t be a WML. If you only have one flashlight, then make it a handheld. In other words, a WML doesn’t replace a handheld, but that doesn’t make WML’s useless, either.
I wish I could say I'm amazed that so many people can't seem to grasp this point, but sadly, I'm not.
@@eriggle83 The Fuddery in the comments section is getting deep.
@theunknownknowsBYvoivod Yes, it is. What does surprise me is that there's so much of it amongst MACs viewers. Maybe it's just a bunch of KH or WC fans who found this in their feed today? If that's the case, then it makes perfect sense.
Agreed. If I can only have one, then go handheld, but of course that premise will never happen…
Exactly. There are so many excellent pocket-sized flashlights out there that there's no reason not to have one on you at all times. A WML is a specific piece of kit meant for a specific use.
He went full Fudd. "When's the last time you needed that?" I've never needed to use any firearm in self-defense, but that doesn't mean I'm going to stop carrying one.
What he meant is that if lacking on a camping trip. When is the last time you honestly used a trenching tool on your overnight camping with your kids? Same thing. Save weight by leaving at home thungsnyiure. Ever gonna actually use.
@Hattiesburg9333 I've used one on every camping trip to dig my fire pit. What's your point? Where did he say anything about camping? What does that have to do with anything being discussed here? WMLs have become so small that the weight is negligible.
The instant you resorted to name calling your opinion meant absolutely nothing.
*I love the stupid kids nowadays. Someone older than you says something? They must be an old stupid person!*
Do you know what the fun thing is about being an old stupid person? You got old because you really were not stupid. And we enjoy watching smug young people make mistakes. Sometimes a reset needs to occur. Sometimes the reset is funny.
@@eriggle83oh my. Didn't do well in school?
The point is, and I'll keep it simple for you is that you should carry the gear you will likely need and not carry gear that you've never needed and are unlikely to.
Sort of that "yeah, I always keep a gas mask handy because the refinery twenty miles away may explode" attitude.
When is the last time you actually needed the sidearm? By the logic he used, “if you haven’t needed it, you don’t need it” you’ll never need to carry in the first place.
That is not what he said.
@@Petetonyit's exactly what he said in regards to weapon lights, this is just taking his same logic and applying it on a broader scale.
I used my side arm just the other day.
I have used it several times. But not once have I or anyone else ever used there weapon light.
TRUTH. Plus, the extra weight helps a little with muzzle flip.
@@robertsears46 You're high. More people use their weapon light LARPing about their house and fucking around with their gun than use their weapon. There's no good reason as to why you wouldn't have a light. Police, CIA, FBI, etc. have all used flashlights along with their sidearms for decades, the fact that you can mount it to the underside rail doesn't make it less effective. The idea that you're somehow adding bulk and complexity via pistol light is also idiotic - it's less complex than the janky holding techniques taught by Hackborn in his DVDs.
Here is how having a light on my pistol saved someone's life and save me from a mess.
Woke up to someone in my room at 2am. Grabbed my gun off the night stand and beamed him with the light. First thing I noticed was no weapon and he was dressed nice. Told him to stop and put his hands where I could see them and held him until the cops showed up.
Turns out he was a drunk college kid that used to rent the same house. Got drunk and thought he was home. Having a little on my gun saved his life.
You need a dog if someone got in your room before you woke up. Jesus
Thats a stretch. Not sure I believe the college kid or you ??
He was talking about your carry gun not your home defense gun.
Though would it have been much different if you had just turned on a bedside lamp?
The thing about pointing flashlights (especially high power ones) is you flashbang yourself when shone at a mirror or even the glass of a window or large framed picture. And especially if you're not 100% (like literally just woken up) you can mistakenly think a flashlight is being aimed at you when it's just a reflection, you don't get much context to recognize your own reflection it's just a blinding point of light. You don't have that problem turning on the light like normal.
Also it's a problem that all the intruder can see is a flashlight, you're not having any deterrent effect of displaying a firearm, a drunk who is more violent may just think he's being irritated by a guy trying to dazzle him with a bright light and is not deterred from attacking but instead - illegitimately - takes it as provocation.
Illumination is very important but you need to be realistic about what is the best use of resources around you.
What if it was a cop?
Maybe he shouldn't have been there, maybe he found the drunk outside with the door open and mistakenly believed the drunk when he said it was his house so when the drunk invites the cop into "his house" the cop strolls in totally not expecting to find you in your bedroom and what does he see? A guy whooping out a pistol with a WML and aiming it at him. He's liable to shoot you.
I know it's not very "tactical" to illuminate yourself by just turning on the lights, but you're not clearing out caves in the mountains of Afghanistan. This is a civilian peacetime situation. For practical considerations, you might want to consider laying all your cards on the table and calling their bluff, you're in your own home, you should be able to stack the deck in your favor without having to resort to subterfuge of hiding in the dark while they're blinded in the light.
Am I overthinking this?
You may not like to overthink things but if you end up in court no one will be able to convince a jury "guys, don't overthink this" and by then it will be way too late to really think about it. When you're in court it will be presented as "how could you have not thought of this, it's obvious".
@@Treblaine Too long to read, yes you are overthinking this.
I live in south Africa where we have between 6 and 18 hours a day with no electricity. I sometimes need a weapons light because my surroundings can be very dark . I also have a light that I use that is not attached to my gun
Desmond sure made a difference in your life, didn't he?
yes and its getting worse. may be time to leave.....@@shooter.mcgavin.
@@JD-tn5lz massive difference…..
He said you don't need a light unless your LE/Mil then went on to use a cop as an example of misusing a weapon light.
Cops and military put forth some of the greatest examples of what not to do. 🤣
he's still correct though
@@AlexN2022 He’s not though.
@@DocMitchell69 well, fair enough, I didn't provide any argumentation.
LE/Military go after the target. That's their job description. So they need tools to do that. Also, they work in teams, so tactics are different.
Civilians are only required - and allowed! - to defend against an immediate threat.
If it's so dark you can't see the threat, the threat can't see you. You don't go after him, you disengage.
In your own house, where you cannot disengage, you know where the light switch is.
@AlexN2022 ok but why would I rely on the assumption I can get to the light switch when I can just mount a light to my gun?
When things get stupid I want every advantage possible. If that means a bayonet on my flamethrower, so be it.
I definitely would not put a weapon mounted light on my flame thrower though. Just saying.
**the bayonet might be useful, the flamethrower in a house not a good idea.
@kirkchartier7141 well, depends whose house I guess.
@@JJheadcharge I'm going to take it you're being sarcastic because using a flamethrower in a house. Is pretty darn stupid.
**Using it somebody else's house that's criminal and a shootable offense.
@@kirkchartier7141 I'm going to take it you're playing dumb, because if this were a serious take, straw-manning an argument is an incredibly weak position to take. Especially since straw is highly flammable, and you are arguing with a flamethrower... one might call THAT stupid.
When is the last time you needed a fire extinguisher ? But I have one, actually several.
Much like weapon lights fire extinguisher are pointless.
@@robertsears46 Please stop posting, youre just trolling.
@@smtbigelow I am the ONLY one NOT trolling and being a FUDD. You are trolling and being a FUDD like everyone else that things weapon lights are a good thing.
@@smtbigelow And poorly at that.
Actually a fire blanket makes much more sense to keep for small fires especially in the kitchen. Fire extinguisher is to carve yourself an exit route if you are encircled, so keep an extinguisher in your bedroom, fire blanket in the kitchen
Just because a Wilson combat weapon is extremely expensive doesn't help when it's dark and can't find a light switch on the wall
I like the option of being able to distinguish friendly/foe, in low/no light conditions.
The problem with using a WML to do that is you have to point a gun at someone before you've distinguished whether they are friend or foe.
So you need an independent light source and to use that first. And when the threat isn't present you need to switch back to that independent light source, you can't wave your gun around everywhere sweeping with the light.
If you cannot tell if someone is “friend or foe” then you should not be drawing your gun, and you sure as Hell shouldn’t be pointing a loaded gun at an unidentified target, Alec Baldwin.
@@tfeltmat2903 🤣🤣🤣
I remember looking at lighting advice in gun magazines 30+ years ago, they advised holding the flashlight out sideways so as to draw fire towards the beam and away from your body.
@Treblaine so you are going to carry a flashlight
A weapon mounted light is a weapon light, not a utility light. I've carried CCW with and without a pistol light, and I have trained with both. My home defense rifle has a light and optic. I haven't made the move to red dots on pistols yet because I am more comfortable with the sights. Use the gear you are comfortable with. Keep up the good work.
Definitely agree here. I went with a laser for close and scope for distance. Handgun, I use a bright flashlight and standard enhanced sights. Personally I just don't like using my gun as a search light 😂
I can't envision myself ever moving to a pistol RDS. Certainly didn't help out the genious acorn cop hit his target. Which is a good thing in that case.
You’re not gonna just become comfortable with red dots. You got to take the plunge and get to training. Only once you figure it out will you see how much better it is.
@@TheGeorgianGuynope. Been to the trainings and I'm also an instructor.
Do pistol dots provide a significant advantage to a competent shooter in 99% of a shooting he's likely to face? ABSOLUTELY NOT; not even in law enforcement.
Will it distract a mediocre or poor shooter from training fundamentals? Every single time. Every single damn time.
Is it an extra piece of gear to maintain? Yes.
Does it make a firearm harder to conceal? Yes.
Do pistol dots assist a highly competent or extremely well-trained shooter perform better on qualifications courses or in flat-range competitions? Yep.
Is it one more profit center for an optics company? Oh boy howdy, yes indeed.
For home defense, my 2 cents is a light is needed to positively identify someone at night. Your teenager might have snuck out for a party and is sneaking back in, etc.
for a nightstand gun absolutely vital
Since the advent of blue LEDs my house has unfortunately never been dark enough that I need lights.
You don't have ANY electronics in your house? Your house is dead pitch black at night?
Yeah martian... that little.blue light will instantly tell you if it's your son or a stranger at the door as you wipe away the night crumbs from your eyes and try to peer into to the darkness.
Your comments on this thread clearly identify you as an anti-2A shill who has most likely never held a gun or has never trained even once in a force on force encounter! It's your 1A right to say what you want. And it's our right to shake our head and see your stupidity.
@@m4rvinmartian Completely agree.
Why?
" for a nightstand gun absolutely vital "
Why?
"When's the last time you needed a gun attachment?" When's the last time you needed a gun? It's not about "need", it's about "want for its advantages in the right circumstances"
correct, you fight to win no matter what, regardless of what some old duffer says.
RDS and WMS are not necessary on an EDC, on a nightstandgun sure. If you need a light, what are you gonna do, pull a your weapon and point it to light up something or someone? Pocket lights just makes more sense and are more useful. You can light up anything safely and not risk pointing your weapon for no reason. You clearly drew your weapon, if adked in a court of law you would have to say, I drew my weapon. Hand held pocket lights just make better sense for EDC. YOU can directly illuminate someone and still have your hand on your weapon. Onve anyone gets lit up by a light thay wince, this gives you a time advantage. If you light them up and it isn't a threat, you never drew your weapon.
As for RDS, he stated 10 yards and in they make no difference. That's true.
As for needing something... Do you tow a spare vehicle behind your vehicle, just in case??? No.
That's the point he made with EDC , not nightstand guns.
Never understood making a EDC bigger and heavier. Just being honest. Carry what you want .
@@shepleonard8695 What kind of yuppie buys a pistol for CC, and an entirely separate one for home defense? That's like $1k for a gun and range time/ammo that's way less effective than just using a long gun in the home, and a pistol for CC. Or just a CC pistol.
Alot of people do this. Ive got guns in ever one of my cars and trucks. Shooting is shooting. Nothing changes from a 9mm 1911 to a 9mm Sig 365, baducs are basics. And it's more like $2500. @userequaltoNull
Ken is a very good shooter, and has a wealth of knowledge and real world experience. With that being said. I'm an old man too. So it's not an age thing, it's a stubborn thing. I recently got a red dot for a pistol and let me tell you, it was an absolute game changer, I'm dinging 3 inches at 25 yards, which I couldn't do before. I've had a light on most of my guns for at least 10 years. So I don't know exactly what he's on about except that if it was good enough for dad it's good enough for me mentality.
Yeah Ken is way off the mark and starts off pretty condensending
he's pretty well stuck in 1982.
@@leftyo9589 naw more like 1992.....lol
Okay but be honest how often have you ever used your weapon mounted light against a threat though? The chances of you needing to draw your firearm on someone is not zero but it’s not very high either. And in those times that you did or would have to draw your weapon on someone, did you ever use the light or do you think you would need the light? Or would you even remember to turn the light on in those tense brief moments? Probably not. A separate hand held flash light though is a different story and a must. If you have to point your weapon at someone before you are able to identify if that someone is a threat then you may as well be the threat.
So with that in mind we can summarize the situations when you would need a gun mounted light is; 1)when you already know for sure that the threat is indeed a threat, 2) that threat is not directly in front of you right now but is hiding somewhere with very poor illumination in a defensive manner waiting for you to move towards him, and 3) you have no choice but to move into that dark place and secure it immediately. Unless you are clearing houses with the SWAT team on a regular basis I honestly can’t think of a self defense situation where you would need to use your weapon mounted light. And on the off chance you do find yourself in such a situation which fits all 3 of those criteria, it’s not actually an immediate threat right in front of your face, so just call the cops and wait outside lol.
And I’d like to point out your red dot uses were useful for plinking targets at extended range but if you ever needed to draw your EDC in self defense situation its not likely you would need the red dot or even have time to use it. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure it way more fun to shoot with a red dot. It’s just that you are not likely to use it in a real life civilian self defense situation, at least not one you could convince a jury was self defense.
@@tawan5753
I typed up the following out of respect for you. I normally don't debate online.
and I don't mean to sound rude, but your three paragraphs is full of a lot of ignorance or maybe just not having the knowledge. I mean that with no disrespect. I've used my WML countless number of times . You then pose what if's for a WML. The whole point is to decide and see your target, if I shine a handheld on him/her and they have a gun up, I'm toast...it speeds up your OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) loop, so you're not fumbling for a light switch, button, etc and now they're outside your OODA and have the drop on you. Now granted there is much training that is involved with a WML. Dangers such as back lighting, spot lighting, and shadowing. Which can be mitigated with proper training. Such as STOP LISTEN MOVE cover concealment, with the light off. So as not to give away position, I could write a book on WML.
Now when you bring up the red dot. If you're having to spend time acquiring your red dot. You need to train more. It should be just as much second nature as acquiring your front sight. Now if you're referring to point shooting, then it's a moot point and your target is within 7-5 yards. If that's not what you meant, then I'll turn you on to the now famous..."dickens drill". Look up the story. Discounting a red dot in an EDC situation is just close minded. It sounds like you haven't used one or aren't used to it because You say "ever needed to draw your EDC in self defense situation its not likely you would need the red dot or even have time to use it." you do know it stays on right? You don't need to hit any buttons....Its there. Like your irons. I co-witness mine in case the sight does go down, the battery life is usually 2 - 5 years depending on brand. It's a valuable tool that may even help you mitigate errant shots, let you be the first shot on target, and live through your unfortunate encounter.
I'll add you also say " you have no choice but to move into that dark place and secure it immediately. Unless you are clearing houses with the SWAT team on a regular basis I honestly can’t think of a self defense situation where you would need to use your weapon mounted light"
You've never had to clear your house after a bump in the night? Turning on lights, gives you away among many other things I could go on about, such as see inside, no, see outside not inside...if somethings outside....otherwise You just gave all advantage to a potential deadly threat.....Anyway....
Hope this clears some things up.
I think everyone is blowing this out of proportion. The point of the discussion is people are so focused on buying tactical stuff vs buying and and practicing
I definitely agree with you 100%, but with great power , comes great responsibility. Its because who Ken to the tactical world as to why this is such a big deal. He very well could be putting peoples lives at risk.
I agree with training with the gear you own. Having said that, there is nothing wrong with having a light on your carry pistol. If you never need it, consider it insurance. If you do need it and don’t have it, you are screwed. It’s not as though we’re talking IR Illuminator/ laser on there, along with a bipod. He’s out of line on this one…
A WML has benefits even without direct usage. It’s literally used in competition to reduce muzzle flip
The message I got from watching that Ken Hakathorn video was not that he said you should not have WML's. But they are not as necessary as all the tacticool fudd's are saying. Generally as a defender if you need a WML you probably needed a flash light first then you identified that there is a threat and pulled your weapon. Also you are going to learn to shoot one handed anyways and people have trained to be very effective with one handed shooting for a very long time. So it's possible that a basic minimal EDC combination fine and that you should get to the range and buy practice and training.
@@luckymanham302 yea but general if you need a WML you needed a flashlight fist and since you already got one. Why not just practice shooting with that
I don't think there's ever an absolute answer for everyone in every situation.
Tell that to "when was the last time you needed that" Ken.
There's a perfectly good answer, don't use your wml to identify people, that's called threatening. Use a handheld. If someone were to point there gun at me to make sure that I'm not a threat the first thing I'm doing is calling the police on this idiot. We'll see how the law sees it.
With all due respect to Ken Hekathorn, such a comment deserves the same cognitive that our potted plant and chief needs.
"There are no absolutes"
-Paul Harrell
i think it was in one of the tactics videos, part 2 probably
yup, ken likely has never needed his pistol, nor his seatbelt in his car, nor the smoke detector in his house, but he has em all!@@georgewhitworth9742
I feel like if you live in in the sticks, that light will definitely come in handy
Exactly. Your circumstances should drive your choices, and whatever anyone else wants to do is up to them.
Yup. More candela the better. Easier to see what those glowing green eyes in the brush are connected to 🤪
@@bobbyberry5559 100% what I was thinking you can tell a lot by what color the eyes glow
I'm in an apartment in a busy suburb. Kinda short on windows, so it can get dark inside. When a storm knocks out power (which is unheard of in Florida, I know, but), the suburbs are pretty damned dark, too. Can't have too many lights.
@@bobbyberry5559agree, but it’s good to have a light with a dim and bright setting. I have light colored painted walls in my house, with some ultra bright light, if someone puts their foot through my door and I have to wake up, get up, grab my gun, a good way to blind yourself is have a light that is too bright.
Biggest problem I have had is holster selection. There just arent that many holsters with light options and those who do generally only cater to a couple of light manufacturers.
Try MIE holster
Amazon weapon light user detected
MSP or Floodlight 2 are the ones to go for...that is if your light is not Amazon/AliBaba in origins
I watched the Wilson video when it first came out three weeks ago, but I did not draw the same inferences you did, so I revisited it before posting my response. Here's my takeaway. It's easy to cherry-pick Ken's comments to support your position, but it's better to consider them in their totality. Ken did not tell folks they did not need a light; he asked them when was the last time they needed it. Later in the video he said if you are going to use a light or red dot, you should train with them. He also covered the pros and cons of these add-ons. I'll quote his conclusion. "If you're willing to put the time in - and the effort - and I tell people, to me a red dot sight is like a 1911 designed pistol; it's an enthusiast's tool. It takes a higher level of skill and maintenance to keep it going. If you're in that lifestyle - if you accept them - then putting a red dot on your gun will make more sense. But if you're not willing to put the effort and the training and the trigger time in, I think it's probably a bad pursuit." I agree with Ken. Training is always the key. As for why you would have different configurations on your carry and bedside guns, I would say it's because they serve two different purposes that only you can determine. If you think this is a training and familiarization mistake, then I have to ask why do you use more than one type of handgun? Why do you rotate your carry options? Wouldn't a single, never changing setup be preferable?
Add whatever you want to your weapons. I am not a proponent of adding any weight or bulk to my carry gun.
Agreed. Concealment is critical (for comfort too). Anything that could snag, slow down draw speed, etc. I'm not interested in. A civilian defensive shooting is likely going to be fast and very close range. Don't need a light or optic on a CARRY pistol. If I need a light (e.g. dark alley) I probably already have a flashlight out and using it to guide my way. Home defense, different tool and analysis. You're not carrying it, not really worried about draw speed, would want a light in the event of power outage, etc.
It’s crazy to me how much the internet took this out of context.
Do you need a light yes a gun mounted light nope.
His opinion is still respected by shooters.
Not this one.
@@captaintripps935 I said shooters
For the MAC channel, I have the utmost respect for you and the value you bring to shooters and the shooting industry.
I worked at Silencer Shop for a time and got to meet you in person.........you even gave me the velcro emblem off your hat when I asked about how to get one.
You are as genuine in person as your are on your on MAC. You truly set the standard of what experienced shooters and industry leaders need to be.
Keep up the phenomnial work.
THANK YOU!!
You can't pull your gun to light up the area ,in some states that a felony. Just carry both weapon light and carry
Well, that can depend on a lot of things. Regardless, once a deadly threat has been identified, you need to drop any light and get both hands on the gun and properly grip it, so it should have an integrated light of its own.
@floridaman6138 yes like I said carry both hand held and on gun
@@floridaman6138in my home state of ny, light on gun is deadly force. So even if the gun is unloaded, you are presenting deadly force using the light on it which means it better be pointing at something presenting deadly force
Followed Ken for decades. He’s not much older than me. I live out in the sticks with no liggts on poles on my property. I’ve had a few occasions where people entered our property and I approached them with a handheld light in one hand and my handgun in the other. First time I dealt with that situation was the last time I used a handheld. That night I ordered several lights for several of my home defense tools. The next time I had to approach someone it was with a mounted light and it was way more user friendly. I had way more control of my handgun having both hands on the weapon making for a much safer encounter. The 3 times I had to approach folks they drove 1/3 of a mile down a dirt road with multiple no trespassing/ private property signs. I took pictures of them and their tags as they turned around. Always use a mounted light.
Opinion of course. You had trouble with a handheld does not mean others will have the same trouble. Of course with a WML, you can aim to the left, right or up or down and still see what you need to.
@@winstonsmiths2449
I didn’t have trouble with a handheld. I’ve qualified multiple times on LEO course using handhelds. I just realized the disadvantages of a handheld over a WML. I always carry a high lumen edc light in my pocket and it sits next to my bedside at night. In the end it’s all personal preference and truth is no one way is the be all end all.
I agree that if one’s desires a WML than that is their choice. What I caution you to consider is that a light now reduces your night vision temporarily. Your light gives your position away if you are on your own familiar terrain. Next is the problem of Aggravated Assault when you point a deadly weapon at an individual who means you no harm like a lost traveler. His proof that you pointed a deadly weapon? Your weapon “mounted” light. They have their place but you must admit that they have their problems that one may not be able to legally overcome. Just my opinion.
This is an idiotic post that does not validate a WML in any way shape or form
@@omardevonlittle3817
You’re correct. It’s an opinion based on a few situations. What works for one person might not work for others. Hence all the changes in gun designs, the way one holds a gun, the type of stance one utilizes. There is no one method that is the answer.
The problem isn't lights. The problem is the dumbasses who don't use them correctly and are dangerous to those around them. Wherever you point your gun-mounted light, you're pointing your gun. I think that is the point Hackathorn was getting at. I know Paul Howe, who has a superior tactical mind than most, prefers and teaches hand held for that very reason.
I do like a light in the hat brim. Nice hands free that helps practical things like writing and roadside repairs.
This is why I love my Surefire Stiletto and Stiletto Pro.
And you aren't committing assault with a deadly weapon.
@@specom im also not dumb enough to qualify for police work.
Bad guys shoot at lights! You wear a lighted hat brim, well,,,,,,
@@kinch613 fair point, if it were just being left on drawing atrention. just made a great point why automatic grip/shake on lights are not ideal and better to have quick easy access. Sometimes ya just need to not draw attention to yourself.
Ken knows what he's doing, he's grasping for relevancy and saying something controversial gets clicks. Oldest trick.
I'm not gonna lie, I don't think that's it man. I genuinely believes what he's saying.
Getting clicks doesn’t mean getting sales. His comments definitely aren’t getting Wilson combat any new customers.
@@michaels5210 Exactly bro. The whole "negative attention is still attention" is BS. All he's done is make people ask why Wilson is showing this guy still.
His comments make me stay away from Wilson Combat. Not to mention, there’s nothing worse for your reputation than saying dumb stuff that is blatantly wrong. Wilson claiming that you will ruin their pistols if you drop a slide on an empty chamber one in a while. That makes me not want one. Especially when other manufacturers say it’s ok on their 1911’s.
I do have a pistol light, but have often thought that turning it on at night in a gun fight would reveal your location and give your opponents something to shoot at.
Proper use of a light is something that requires a little training, just like anything else. There is a way to use a light that maximizes the benefits and reduces the risks.
Especially as the typical housebreaker likely won't be aiming anyway, they're just blasting away in the general direction.
@Treblaine Okay. I will be less discrete. I was shot at night time. I turned my light off and moved. I don't want to go into detail.
@RickNethery So does a muzzle flash. Better than getting a light, is getting a light with so many lumens that you can see but they can't. Cops keep their headlights and flashers on during a road stop, not just for safety from drivers still on the road... it's an offensive perception deterrent to disorient any would be attackers from facing them. Same reason snipers keep the sun to their back if they can. Better to be behind the light than facing it.
Just trying to give you some peace of mind, not being a critical jackass.
@murdurmuffin7872 Oh, I understand, and in the right environment, a light could be very useful. You would have to be smart about it, though. Hope that your muzzle flash is the last thing your enemy ever sees. 👍
I believe they're an essential addition to any defensive setup. A well-equipped handgun isn't just about accuracy; it's about preparedness for any scenario, including low-light situations where visibility is crucial. Lights not only aid in target identification but also serve as a deterrent. It's all about being ready for whatever comes your way.
Considering your handle I find it odd you put so much trust in things that run on electricity in an emergency. WML make poor shooters better at holding onto a piddly 9mm and red dots on pistols are for people who don't understand where the bullet goes when their sights are lined up(which you have to do to use a red dot in the first place if you even aim with sights). This armchair speculation in these comments section aren't from people who have done ANYTHING. Even our most venerated guntoobers aren't a bona-fide all pro daisy gardener. You think his experience goes out of the window because "times change" he's not arguing for people to carry a revolver, he's just speaking the truth.
Why are you pointing a gun at someone you haven’t identified?
@@outofrangetv2353 Because some of us live on rural acreage miles from cell service and when you investigate what has freaked out the herd and alerted the dogs at 3am you don't venture out with both hands in the air. Out here we are our own first responders. I have a WML for the same reason I have a trauma kit, night vision, fire extinguisher, and gmrs in the atv.
@@outofrangetv2353I take it you have never trained with a wml
I'm a big fan of weapon mounted lights. Super handy when packing meat out after dark in bear country....they definitely have a place. I have red dots on handguns as well, but still undecided on how much I like them. I do know older folks like them more often than not... make the decisions on what works for you
Give those two Gun Fudds another 5 mins and I swear, I SWEAR one of them would have said "I support the 2nd Amendment but..."
Not out in the boonies where we live, MAC. A handheld and weapon light are both essential here.
Carry a flashlight. Weapon mounted light is stupid.
It’s not only for darkness but blinding the perpetrator as well
@@m4rvinmartianjust like your comment
@vicdiaz5180 but it doesn't blind the guy. It tells the guy shoot at the light. You cannot use the light to ID people because if it's an innocent person then you, as the gun owner, committed a crime.
@@Aelazadnemost lights over 300 lumens shined right in someone’s eyes will leave a huge after image in the center of their vision for at least 20 seconds. You use that 20 seconds to get off a shot, move off the X or find cover. The idea that somebody will shoot at the light in the second or two you have it on to ID them is ridiculous. This isn’t Die Hard…
Ken needs to realize that we all don’t go to bed a 6pm like he does. Some of us do go out at night and need a light to positively identify a threat and engage.
Ken Goes To Bed At 4pm
Please tell me you're at least using the coronal light reflected off of surfaces and not aiming the muzzle at someone who hasn't been identified yet.
If you haven't positively identified whatever "it" is as a threat, you have absolutely no business pointing a weapon at "it" in the first place.
Situational awareness > weapon features. When I go out in the city, I carry a small pistol with no extra shit on it for deep concealment, and a separate EDC light. If I need to see what that person crouched down by my car is, I can do that without pointing a weapon on it - and with my other hand on the weapon if the situation calls for it. If I need stabilization, I can do the old school police cross and shoot just fine. Maybe somebody dropped their keys, or had to tie their shoe. I don't want to find out by committing felonies.
If I'm on my property I might have a full size pistol with a weapon light. But I'm also carrying a flashlight. I'll switch to the weapon light if the situation calls for it, and not before.
If you have room for a weapon light, you have room for a flashlight. If you don't need a flashlight, you also don't need a weapon light.
Everyone needs to take a breath and read/listen to what Hackathorn actually said. “I think lights in today’s world are extremely overrated. Again, if it’s the gun on your nightstand, that’s different.”
MAC actually misrepresents this immediately in the title of the video. The words “overrated” and “useless” are not synonyms. How many of you have a brand new, never used spare tire in your car? Or a brand new, never used fire extinguisher? How many of you have ever changed a flat tire or ever used a fire extinguisher? A shocking number of drivers don’t even know how to change a flat. Are fire extinguishers and spare tires “useless”? I’d say they are not useless. Are spare tires and fire extinguishers “overrated”? There is a very valid argument that these two items meet the definition of overrated. It’s still very acceptable to have both anyway.
A majority of the discussion in MAC’s video and a majority of the comments here are talking about lights on nightstand/home defense guns and you’re all getting off in the weeds and not listening/comprehending what the guy actually said.
Well said. I would add a distinction to your point.
A basic EDC gun is like a "doughnut" spare. Limited in capability, but compact and lightweight enough to always have with you.
A gun with a light and laser is like a full-sized spare. Even better, but most of the time is more work to carry in your vehicle.
All Ken is saying is that a full sized spare is not that important as long as you at least have a doughnut spare.
I'm old school I was a cop for over 30 years. I never had lights mounted on my weapon. I remember a female officer shoot a suspect my accident. She was using her weapon mounted light as a flash light. The man came out of a closet and surprised her she shot him...I made have done the same.
Ken has the right to his own opinion, and based on decades of experience, he may have a point that plain joes don't need one...but you can carry what ever makes you comfortable. Remember, if the threat is 10 + yards it may be hard to justify the potentially deadly force so you may as well run
"Idiots do stupid things so no one needs lights and gadgets" -Fudd
You are the FUDD hear Ken is right in everyway.
Don't listen to robertsear thats above my comment. Obviously a troll.
I was actually in a situation that was REALLY close to a situation where a WML would have made a huge difference. If I'd been out of the tow truck a few seconds earlier, my pistol would have been out. Dropping a car in a not-great area at around 3 AM, some homeless guy approaches and gestures around and I catch a flash of something that looks like a knife in his hand.
Me and the customer were still in the truck, so I just called the cops and let them handle it. But if the timing had been just a little different, the light on my carry gun would have been completely necessary.
I did also have a hand-held light, but when speed matters, one draw.
Tim, I posted the following over on Colion Noir's video about the same subject. "I am an old "fudd" and a retired Army CID agent. One of the worst preconceived notions people have about LEOs is that they all know how to use a firearm and nothing could be further from the truth. Frankly, I am more uncomfortable around a LEO with a gun than I am around a civilian with a gun. Most LEOs carry a gun because [they have too] and most do only what they have to do so that they can carry the gun for the job. Civilians on the other hand are carrying because they want to, which results in more (not all) of them going to the range to practice and to seek training.
I want to acknowledge that Ken has forgotten more about firearms that I have time left in life to learn about them, but despite all his knowledge he is not “all knowing.” Let’s take Ken’s logic to the next step. Most cops during a 25 year career will [never] pull their gun out of the holster in the line of duty. Is a cop carrying a gun on duty “overrated.”
If I am wearing pants, then I am carrying a pocket light. Most of the time it just rides in my pocket, but when I need it, I need it now. Same with a carry gun. The possibility of me actually needing to use my carry gun is slim to none, but if I do need it, I am not going to be controlling the where or when it is needed. I don’t want to be handicapped by not having a gun, so why would I handicap the gun by not giving it all the capability it can have so that it can do what I need it to do, when I need it to do it?
Bottom line, we need to listen and learn from people like Ken, but we should never discount what our own knowledge and training has taught us, and just accept what he says, just because it is him saying it. Especially, if we have had any experience that contradicts what he is saying. Apparently, Ken doesn’t go out at night, has never been in an unlit parking lot or in a public building when the lights have gone out. For the record, I have done or experienced all those things as an old retiree."
The problem with having a light attached to your firearm, is that you will use it as a flashlight. That is a natural response to identify what is around you in the dark.
This can lead to "brandishing", which can lead to arrest, jail, attorney fees, seizure of your weapons, etc. It may lead to death or serious injury if you light up a cop!
Check the laws in your states about "brandishing" and be aware of potential pitfalls.
Im surrounded by crackheads and I have never unholstered my weapon to use the light on it. You could, you know, carry a flashlight.
Wrong if you train properly and equip yourself properly, you dont use your weaponlight as a flashlight.
Can we PLEASE get more of these podcast style videos? This is probably one of my favorite videos you have ever put out and I've been following you off and on for the last 13 years here on UA-cam.
"I wish I had fewer flashlights in this emergency situation" said no one ever.
I think a weapon mounted light is a good idea. You should also be carrying a good high output handheld light also.
I carry both..and train with both
I'm old enough to remember when Jeff Cooper was the Godfather of defensive pistol craft.
I also remember his advice becoming dated.
Ken is becoming Jeff Cooper.
Everything Jeff Cooper said was 100% right and perfect advice that still holds up great today.
True, very true. The only thing that is continuous is change. To stand on a hill of accomplishment and say this is the highest peak attainable means you have limited your knowledge and experience. To be fair, I do not think every pistol needs a light. A small ccw that has a low hit probability past 12 yards, well ok maybe not. It depends on the situation and your training. What’s coming up, well multiple threats in defense scenario was unlikely 30 years ago. Now, gang activity, Tangos, saboteurs are increasing in probability daily.
@@caseysmith8831 That is just a massive lie.
@@robertsears46 Not even close to 100%
Him and Ayoob.
The light makes you a super easy target, until 2008 we trained military and police to keep a light away from your body, hold it away because people shoot for the light and your dead, in my profession I love the bad guys to have a light and make my job easy and quick. 50 years of training and still alive.
That's exactly why I don't run lights
“Why would you have a different configuration?” Because I can’t concealed carry a full-size 10mm with a light & a dot every day, but I can have one in a quick access safe in the nightstand. Everything is a compromise: I CCW a naked P365 because any bigger/heavier and I won’t always have it with me.
Best answer right here
When Ken and Paul (Howe) and especially Bill Wilson speak, I listen. I also have my own experience and can trust but verify what I know to what experts say. I’ll never discount the knowledge of guys like Ken but I also always take my own insights into account too.
Nah you gotta call out the stupidity and realize this guy is basing all these claims from his time he is way passed his time because by his argument why own anything at all since we don't use it at all times.
I’m going to have to pile on the “Fudd Tzu Says” meme with this gem on weapon lights.
I have weapon lights on all my HD guns. I don't have one on my carry gun.
Me too. I THINK that's what he was talking about. He had to be more specific, and he used a bad example of the idiot using his WML as a regular flash light.
Good lights on hand guns is very pointless.
"I have weapon lights on all my HD guns. "
Why? What is your logic?
Same... I put mustard on all my hotdogs at home but when I go out for hotdogs, I don't use mustard.
@@virtuaguyverify😂
I understand what Mr. Hackathorn is saying, I believe. You hear a bump in the night, and you start clearing your house with a pistol with a light mounted on it. You come around a corner a there is someone standing in your living room. You light them up with your weapon mounted light and it's your teenage son or daughter sneaking back in the house! This means that you have your weapon pointed at your child and your only a few pounds of pressure away from taking out your child. Use a handheld light and don't shoot your kids.
Why is your booger hook on the bang switch? This entire arguement relies on breaking the most important rule of weapons handling.
You do you - great philosophy. Do what works for you, and let others do what works best for them. Be open to new technologies but don't adopt/ use them if they don't work for your needs. OUTSTANDING 😊
They're useful for home defense and rural defense where street or traffic lights aren't common.
Bad part is that they can tell attacker exactly where to shoot outside and indoors it can possibly blind the user if the light bounces from the wall
Rarely does anyone consider that they may have to defend themselves with one hand/arm disabled. Pistol/light combo allows me to use both with a single hand. What if hypothetically you are carrying your child in one arm, or dragging someone to safety… pistol/light combo handy?
Do you know what a light is for?
When was the last time you were in such utter complete darkness, you needed a flashlight to make out faint details?
I literally cannot remember it EVER being that dark, except when I took exceptional acts to make it dark, like a photo darkroom.
The point is you are never going to be in a place so dark you need a WML if you are a civilian.
@@robertsears46Well...not really. It is often dark when I take out the garbage. If I hear something I use my handheld light and then may pull my pistol if I see an animal. I would never pull my pistol to just use the flashlight.
@@m4rvinmartian uhhhh.. spent 29 years as a cop on the streets, multiple shootings… think I have a clue.
@@KretikosThen the same could be said about your edc flashlight. If you rarely ever need or use it, then by your reasoning, you shouldn't have it all. Obviously you carry it for "what if" scenarios as well.
Walking the dogs in a conversation trail later than I should have been out. The sun went down and I started to hear noises in the woods surrounding me as I made my way out of the trails. The first thought I had was, "I really wish I had a weapon light to see what the fuck that was." All my handguns now have weapon lights.
A regular flashlight would show you that… you don’t use a WML for scanning.
That was the main point that you DONT use a wml to just light something up!🤦♂
@@American-mk9nn So I can ID a threat and engage with my finger?
@@Gieszkanne Maybe you missed the part about being in conservation land, no one around, on trails? Frank isn't coming stomping out of the woods towards me at night, and if he is, Frank getting shot.
So you are going to muzzle sweep innocents on the trail? That is what a handheld lite is for. My handheld is on my body when I am awake. It will temporarily blind a perp with ill intentions if need be.
Tell me how much you like your lite when you're appearing before a judge for brandishing a weapon.
The key premise of Hackathorn's view is that "when was last time you needed that [weapon light]?" The fallacy here is that he is referring to non-LE civilians. So my question is when was the last time his target audience needed their weapon for defense? Zero? Then by his logic, they should not even be carrying a weapon.
Thankfully, I've never had to use my pea shooter. Using the same 'when's the last time you used it' statement, I shouldn't carry my pea shooter any longer.
Fudd Lord Ken, 💯. Absolutisms do not exist in our modern world. Watching/listening to Ken's rant is wild.
Never go full Joe Biden.
I don't think Ken will change his mind, but any future discussion on the top, I think will WC will tell Ken to tone it on the Fuddery.
Ken is showing his background, and opinion. Period. Myself? In the house at night, I use a handheld vs a mounted light. 5 kids make me more cautious. I practice those techniques. When I hit the woodline, or think something is raiding the chicken coop, 12 GA. slug gun with a light. Old grunt that still uses the phrase, situation dictates. All this is still a personal thing. Oh, your opinion on weapon differences. What I carry is what I carry. ALL the time. I do not try to tell others what they should or shouldn't do, unless it's clearly unsafe.
"If you have a light on a gun, when was the last time you needed it?"
Hell old man, apply the exact logic to the gun itself.
Exactly
I had a very recent experience which made me believe a weapon light is a great idea. I live in very rural Oklahoma. Both my son and I were fishing under a bridge on the Arkansas river where there are only cow fields between Coweta and Haskel OK. It had gotten dark and we packed up to head home. When we walked up the embankment there were 3 homeless men sandwiching 10 feet of my truck !!!! We are in the country! Never thought this would be a thing. It was dark, when they saw us the men kinda backed off and acted like nothing was going on. Would not make eye contact. I carry. I have a red dot. Shoot very regularly, retired military and active member is a Tulsa gun club. I for some reason never really thought of having a light on my carry gun. I have it on my nightstand gun because you need to see the threat and what is going on to be safe. This situation made me rethink the light on my carry. What if those men thad other ideas like robbing or hurting us!!!! I would have been at an extreme disadvantage with the very low light as far as identifying threats!! Maybe they saw me an a very large 6,2 weight lifter, football, wrestler high schooler walk up the hill and decided, not as easy as it could have been. I don’t know. It spooked me. Not sure if I could have been accurate or safe without being able to visualize the threat without a light of some kind. I now have ordered a light and new holster for my carry gun. Luckily they just kind of slipped more under the bridge and nothing happened. My truck was locked and nothing in the bed, and most importantly I didn’t have to draw my weapon! and my son and I left safely.
Howdy, neighbor!
what about animals, you get home its dark, and hear a growl sneak up behind you, you take out your edc, turn on the light and see a predator run away from seeing the light.
I absolutely feel more safe with a mounted light.
I can understand why you would think you don’t need a flashlight on a conceal carry gun. If you’re drawing that you’ve already identified a threat and the goal is to get out of the situation.
Did you miss the point about blinding someone for a few seconds?
@@rrr3r2 No.
Low light conditions happen and you can better placed shots when you can actually see your target and what’s behind your target before you shoot with a flashlight
@@rrr3r2 I’m aware of what a weapon light is for
@@kozzy18 apparently not
Notice how he didn't say anything about tritium night sights? Most people insist on tritium night sights on their carry gun... what good are glow in the dark night sights that only work when it is too dark to ID your target? I'll take a weapon light and standard sights any day over just night sights.
Back in the day when they were becoming popular, they were mostly used for an advantage in low light situations to be able to pick up the sights quicker, like a parking garage.
If I recall correctly, he is specifically talking about a concealled carry handgun, not rifles, not pistols for home defense, he has specifically mentioned that in that or other videos. I think the point being made was unless you work at night or are likely to be out and about at night, the vast majority of people probably aren't going to need that light on their concealed carry firearm. The added weight and bulk can be pointless when most people stop carrying guns because they are too big as it is. If your waistband can hold an AR15 then do it. But it doesn't and people struggle as it is with even the smallest guns to want to carry. And I agree somewhat, adding a lot of capability and complexity to a device that you are only most likely going to use within 7 yards (outside the home with a CC pistol). I think they stress the point that you should plan for the probable and not the wildcard or the extreme. But this is only applying to a concealed carry pistol AFAIK. And same with the red dot. For something you may likely be point shooting or shooting without really aiming that much a dot does not actually offer anything over irons. Shots at longer distance are to be rare, and if you want to carry a dot and a light for those 1% chances then thats fine, but carry is every day and I think the point was is that really needed, is the added bulk and complexity of failure worth it? Just to reiterate that this is only in regards to carrying a small carry pistol when outside the home, I am pretty sure he never said not to have a light on your home defense gun or go to war gun, he has said a light on the home gun is needed 100%. People just aren't watching the full video or series. Maybe I got it wrong and he is saying that but that is what I got from those videos. Thoughts and theories on are they really needed or not in all situations basically.
He said it you're not military or LE, you don't need it. And his example of stupid use was of a cop doing very a very stupid thing.
You're introducing a wall of nuance into something that was not very nuanced.
@@bryanpeters5034I must have heard him mention it in a previous episode, maybe he wasnt clear on that, because I specifically remember him saying for home defense its a must. I think the point is, if he is arguing against using it its because it takes up space and weight, a home defense gun it does not matter its size or weight. Therefore he is talking about a carry gun for defense. Point being, you should be retreating out of the area and not moving forward towards the threat to search for them like Military or LE would. Of course you need a light on your home defense gun, because why not? It is not impacted by size or weight like a carry gun is.
I’m with you- I heard “don’t need” and “over-rated.” The only time I heard “useless,” was in the commentary. As to what he actually “said”…I’m sorry but unless someone can show me a considerable amount of self defense shootings in which an attached light was used, then ol Uncle Hack seems to be right…”when was the last time it was needed?” That’s what he said…as for overrated…take a pistol with an optic and attached light- ask yourself, “what’s the one thing that can fail but still make the firearm effective?” 🤔 yeah…the light! Probably have another source I can use on the rare occasion I’d really need it…making the firearm still effective AF….hence…”over-rated.” Also, that light can give your position away. Bad guys don’t need to properly ID a target…there are some occasions in which I’d “prefer” a separate light…again…”overrated.” Uncle Hack is 100% right boys…try not to lose sleep over it 😜
and 99.999999% of the time they wont need the gun either, yet no one is saying dont carry the gun.
@@leftyo9589 He didn’t say, “Don’t carry an attached light…” he didn’t even say “useless” like this title says…The only people that are suggesting that, are the people “saying” what “he said…” for clicks. Funny how you tube is falling into the same trap as the big network news now…it’s all about the money. Even for UA-camrs…
I find it hilarious that Wilson Combat was getting so much backlash they took down the Hackathorn videos on IG and UA-cam 😂
He is exactly right! In the civilian world a light , Red dot sight inc is not needed. Name me a single place where one would be in a place so dark that you can see someone attacking you? ( of and using a WML to see if person is a threat or not and it turns out that they are not , is called assault by pointing a weapon). Remember you don’t have the same responsibility as law enforcement or military, you are not required to actively search for suspects or the enemy, clear houses cars inc. you are reacting to an immediate threat. If it’s so dark that you can’t see the threat then the threat can see you. As to red dots. The distance that civilian self defense situation ( not in home defense where a light would be an advantage )that place is measured in feet not yards so the red dot has no real advantage over iron sights. That’s the actual facts, but people will get butt hurt over hearing the truth.
It's called rural life.
@@captaintripps935 what the hell are you talking about??
@@americanpatriot477 I really need to explain the utility of a weapon light on a homestead with livestock, in bear country?
@@captaintripps935 That situation isn’t anything like he was discussing! It has nothing with carrying a concealed weapon for personal defense against humans. Hell in that situation you could carry a shotgun with a weapon mounted light and light up all the bears you want without committing a crime!
@@americanpatriot477 It's methhead country, too, bud. And no appeal to authority is going to convince me not to use appropriate and proven tools available to me. Wilson Combat should stick to making 1911s feed truncated cone and cut the gatekeeping excrement.
I agree, you do you. And maybe you mentioned it and I missed it, but you NEVER point a weapon at what you don’t intend to harm, it’s very easy to use a light to illuminate your target or threat, but you’re now pointing a loaded weapon at that target/threat, and that may be a family member or innocent person. Yup, I’m an old guy, and my eyes pick up a front sight more easily than a red dot, to each their own.
ever noticed a light can light up things its not pointed at........?
Ken doesnt realize that in combat we dont white light in gunfights. We have nightvision for that. White light is for after the gunfight is over amd we are checking enemy bodies for intel and signs of life.
To me uts about pointing a loaded weapon at someone that might not be a threat. If so and the threat is just a guy walking to the vehicle next to yours in a dark parking lot then guess what? If he decides to call the police then you just caught a charge for terroristic threatening with a firearm and you will loose your rights. Carry a handheld. In your home I would say the same thing.
Hackathorn is remarkably..... Right no name calling.
Okay so I know of two times where the person with a gun wishes they had a weapons light... I will only recount the situation that resulted in a fatality. So my wifes, best friends brother and aunt lived in a mobile home together. She goes out to the local pub and loses her keys... Gets a ride home and since it is very late and he has to work in the morning she decides she will crawl through the window. He wakes up in the middle of the night to someone breaking in and crawling through a window in a room where the light doesn't work... She is no longer with us and he has never been mentally right for over 20 years. Many things he might have done different sure but a light on the weapon almost certainly saves her life. True in the other scenario.
So a lot of people come to me that are asking questions about firearms and I insist have a light on your weapon.... My EDC carry selection all have a light. I have a P365 with a TLR-6, a Glock 19 with an Olight PL mini and even a Ruger micro 380 LCP II with a light.... None have a red dot yet because I am the only income in my family but they will.
Yes people do stupid things with lights and lasers.... or guns period... In my estimation not having a light borders on stupid....
Okay a bit of criticism on lights... have a tactical light with you when possible. If your weapons light sticks out past your gun to any significant degree this makes no sense then carry a bigger gun. Buying the smallest lightest easy to carry pistol and making it more bulky than Glock 17 makes me shake my head in disbelief.
Thanks for the video guys, Ken Hackathorn deserves every bit of flack he gets....
I personally believe, like any other tool, it all depends on the applications said tool might be used. I personally just use a handheld light in conjunction with my CCW. That's just me.
At the end of the day, carry what you want, train with your loadout(s), and become proficient.
I'm a fudd & I'm proud of it! No dots/lights on my pistol! It seams like the dot/ light crowd is so defensive, that they are trying to convince themselves that dots/lights are cool. Back in the day gunsluts wrote for gun rags. Today gunsluts are called influencers! Anybody on pewtub can be an influencer. Technology might have improved, but the gunfight has remained the same!
If I was guessing, I'd bet you can shoot single handed, left or right. That seems to be an uncommon skill nowadays.
@@Mrelindio42 The ability to shoot 1 handed with strong or weak hand should be a common, practiced, skill!
Since I am older than dirt, I was taught that on my first LEO job. We even shot at 50 yards with one hand with a 4" barrel revolver as part of our qualification. At least they let us use our strong hand for that part.
What is truely interesting here is why are people freaking out about it?
It is one mans response and his standpoint.
If you do not agree go on about your day and do what works for you.
Why all this fuss about it?
That man in the video is extremely wrong. I can't even comprehend how such a person in this industry would say such a thing.
Not only you can blind a person with it, but it comes extremely handy in low-light situations. Why would you, not a have a light when they are the cheapest way to see in the night or low light areas.
That guy seems to be an extreme fudd.
When's the last time you needed that?
I've never needed a gun to stop an attack. I've never needed car insurance. I've never needed home insurance. I've never needed snow tires. I've never needed a fire extinguisher. I've never needed a hard hat.
What a stupid thing to say.
I really do respect and appreciate the advice and opinion of experienced people like Ken Hackathorn, but at the end of the day, you have to do whatever fits your needs. Don't let anyone shame you for what fits you. Train well and stay safe America.
Always better to have and not need than need and not have.
I never knew Ken existed, and after his comments, he still doesn't exist.
At the end of the day we are all entitled to our own opinions. I may not agree with the opinions of others but I don’t take it personal. I definitely don’t think that name calling is going to change Ken’s opinion. Also Ken’s opinion is not going to change my opinions. Don’t take it personal and keep it moving. Live your life.
This is an interesting discussion, and frankly I think a big part of the problem is that everyone takes discussions on the internet way too seriously, and over-reacts to opinions they don't like.
For instance, KH's comments aren't new. He's said more or less the same thing in the past, and Massad Ayoub has expressed a similar opinion, especially regarding red dots. Full disclosure: I've only ever held a gun with a red dot on it once. I'm poor, and California's laws regarding handguns make mounting a red dot on a handgun very difficult (except if you're exempt) so those of us who are poor are essentially forced into the "gun Amish" community, as the Active Self Protection guy refers to us. Lights on a handgun we can do, but it's my impression that the ASP guy mirrors KH's opinion, civilians don't need them.
One of the things that amuses me about this discussion is that I didn't take KH's comments as an insult, even though it wasn't aimed at me (given I don't have an optic or a light on my gun). The guy to the left (sorry I don't know names here) talks about "clearing his house" if he hears a bump in the night. My first reaction, if I hear a bump in the night, is to hunker down, call the cops, and await their arrival. Sure I'll have a gun in my hand as I wait, but I'm not going to leave my defensive location, unless someone sets the place on fire. I live alone and don't have a pet (might get a cat, they tend to be low maintenance) so if there's a bump in the night it's hostile or the wind, something like that. However, if you live with a family, are you going to "clear the house" with a weapon-mounted light, shining it into every room in your house looking for your loved ones? Like I said, I live alone, but if I had a family I doubt I'd be looking for them with a *weapon-mounted* light, and pointing the gun at a potential family member, until I illuminate them. Not sure how this works (maybe it's my lack of training) but that would seem counter-productive to me. Soldiers and cops, clearing houses of hostiles or drug dealers or whatever, it makes more sense...
By the way, I do have a separate objection to weapon-mounted lights, even when they're issued to cops. There have been two incidents within the last year or so where cops confronted a homeowner in the middle of the night for some reason, and the homeowner had a gun in his hand. The cop shines his light in the person's eyes to "get a tactical advantage" and not only does the homeowner blink, he raises his hands, one of which is holding a gun, to shield his eyes...whereupon the cop shoots him because he raised the gun. You can talk about training all you want, but not all of us are 13th level ninjas who react in trained and highly competent ways to random startling stimuli with cat-like reflexes. In the one case the guy got shot, and he's lying on the floor in the entryway to his house yelling at his wife that he's been shot, and she should call the cops...and the cop who shot him is saying that he IS the cops. That was due to a false silent alarm somehow being triggered. In the other case the cops were literally at the wrong address, and there they killed the homeowner, and his wife fired back at them. She wasn't charged, and I think in both cases the families in question are going to get settlements from the municipalities in question. So as to the question of training: I think there needs to be a lot more of that, and it needs to take into account that when a cop confronts someone with a handgun, that person might not have the high-level training to have a light shined in his eyes without reacting.
"gun Amish" 😆😆
And I appreciate your saying being "poor". I read that as "average, the common folk, most of people". Most of us don't have or should not be spending that kind of money on accessories that cost almost as much as or sometimes more than the firearm itself.
It's ridiculous the way they act like it's nothing.
👍🏼🤟🏼🙏🏼
Anyone on here has to go watch the full video on Wilson Combat and not just the clip. The context of the entire conversation is important. The TLDR for the full video is don’t chase deficiencies in training by trying to supplement it with equipment. In the full video he doesn’t say citizens shouldn’t have lights. He even says he has a light on his home defense pistol. His point is most people aren’t going to get adequate training to know when and how to properly employ the weapon mounted light.
Tone & Context matters, when you start off with a statement like is in the video, it is gonna blow up in your face, I still think Ken is the real deal, he has had a long career teaching, but this tone was really bad and I lost some respect for the man.
"do you actually need that" is a very relevant question that is not presented enough today. To many of us are just taking the word of influencers and marketing and not actually identifying what our basic equipment and skills are first before getting into the nice to have. The ones that come to mind for me are the folks that are always chasing what is "hot" and not focusing on refining what they have.
It's fine to have a red dot (RDS) on a weapon and a weapon light. For the love of God, though, carry a handheld light (or more than one) and use that for general illumination tasks. Know the laws in your state. In some states, unholstering and pointing a loaded, ready-to-fire pistol at someone is felony assault - whether you're just using the light or not. I'm guessing that was a point Ken tried to make (rather poorly). He's buds with Mas Ayoob, who I've seen stress that point more eloquently. Use whatever makes you a more effective shooter. Just know the legal ramifications of lighting up someone with a weapon light in your state... and carry a handheld light.
Man! the keyboard warriors at it’s best! Now suddenly the world needs lights for everything!
I moved to another LE agency that would not allow me to carry my 1911. I was issued a Glock 22 40 caliber. When I placed a light on this pistol it sucked up a lot of recoil making the pistol easier to shoot. That's another reason for a light. I believe Ken Hackathorn criticized appendix carry. With the back problems I have. Appendix is the most pain free way I can carry concealed
It’s the only way I can during the summer in shorts and a tshirt
I like Ken’s commentary but I think he was wrong here. However, I believe that too much emphasis is on a weapon held light and not using a flashlight first.
I my training, weapon lights are secondary, your pocket flashlight is primary.
The last thing you want to do is search with a weapon light. If you light someone up and they were not a threat, you just pointed your gun at them. That is very bad. If you had a hand held, no one is in danger of getting shot.
Handheld first and learn how to shoot with it and practice. Once you got that, Then worry about a weapon mounted light.
I’m gonna take what he said in the beginning: civilian carry. Meaning CCW. Not a home defense weapon. In CCW cases, how long from draw from
Holster to first shot? From a lot of the videos out there, it is too short to even activate a light. Home defense weapon where you are searching your house, that’s a different story. Hence his caveat of not police/military. They need it for searching.
I'm under the mindset of its better to have it and not need it, then need it and not have it, I have a wl, dot on my hand gun, but I also carry a hand held light to illuminate something with muzzling it, just my 2 cents
When was the last time you needed a fire extinguisher?
I think the point he was trying to make was whatever you have learn to use it properly and that you need to set up your firearms and and your gear in a way that works for you not against you. Their are fundamentals and techniques for even using a flashlight. I'm not sure if he was being condescending saying kids nowadays but I do know I'm terrible for trying to say something and it comes out completely wrong.
He was spouting the same crap on the Wilson channel a few weeks ago. Fudlore at its finest.
I think it's entirely dependent on the end user.
Personally, I live in a big city with decently lit streets, so at most I carry a handheld for PID or if I need to see better, and keep my firearm bare. But everyone may not live in an area with decent lighting, some people may own property or live in the country. Others may not have the best eyesight and prefer a red dot. It's entirely dependent on the user. For bag/truck guns, home defense, or long guns, I think it's a completely different story. He was specifically referring to handguns for concealed carry, but (since it was brought up) I think in the instance outside of concealed carry, it makes a lot of sense. If a situation has escalated to the point where I've escalated from a concealed handgun to a a bag/truck gun, home defense gun, or long gun, I absolutely want whatever red dots, lights, and lasers that will help me put rounds on target as quickly as possible.
Here's the problem with weapon mounted lights: In order to see what it is in the dark, you need to flag it with the barrel of your weapon.
That's a no-no. Never point your weapon at something you're not willing to destroy, and always know your target (and what's behind it) before you aim. That's two cardinal rules of firearm ownership broken with one device.
Strangely, and sadly, the biggest haters of the 2A community are other 2A community members. Why? If you want a plate carrier etc., go for it! If you want a hipoint, wpn light, handgun gas pedal etc., go for it! For the love of God, stop hating on those who don’t do exactly what “you” do!
Years ago the leading narrative was, you need a laser and nite sites on your .40 s&w pistol. There are cycles in advertising for guns and gun accessories, and the current narrative is you must have a red dot and a light on your micro 9mm or full size 10mm and a hi-viz front sight.
Well to be fair. A light and red dot sight sound a lot more useful than night sights and a laser.
@Lake_City_Defensive_Training How is a lazer on a gun laughable?
@Lake_City_Defensive_Training Have you ever shot a gun with a lazer?
The "leading narrative" isn't always an advertising gimmick.
Sometimes they're born out of actual innovation.
A laser sight is an improvement that gives you a point of aim for every scenario where you can't pull your gun up to eye level, which is highly likely if you're being assaulted. Night sights are an improvement to standard sights for low light encounters, but they still work during the day too, so you've lost nothing by using them.
A red dot gives you a single point of aim to acquire and allows you to stay target focused under stress, instead of having to line up both windage and elevation on your target while taking eyes off the threat to focus on your front iron sight
High viz front sight helps some iron sight users acquire their sight picture faster, again you've lost nothing by using them.
Lights speak for themselves, whether you ever have to use it or not, some people want the option.
A lot of people simply reject change and decide that the way they've always done something is the best, which may be true for them but not everyone.
I've recently discovered that a red dot is one of the most valuable things that I thought I'd never use.
@Lake_City_Defensive_Training
Ok karen
I use my WML to change my babies diapers
This coming hot on the heels of another respected individual saying you're going to break your gun by releasing the slide on an empty chamber...
"Why do civilians even need to carry a gun?"- this guy in a year
If his arguments were consistent (which they aren’t) then that would be the logical conclusion.
I’m glad I’m not the only one that noticed his contradictions and laughable reasoning.
On concealed carry guns, no lights, red dots, etc. On car guns, open carry guns, and house guns, lights, red dots, load 'em up.
Don't buy a $100 TLR-7A, but be sure to buy one of WC's $3000 7-round products to carry instead.
TLR-7A is badass I love mine but now I got to sell it cuz some old dude said I shouldn’t carry it