What is Uniform Civil Code? | Will Uttarakhand have it soon? | Akash Banerjee

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • 🇮🇳 SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS 🇮🇳 - / thedeshbhakt ▶️
    As an Idea - The Uniform Civil Code is as simple and efficient as it gets. Like Criminal Law - there should be a uniform Civil Law for the people of India - REGARDLESS of religion / geography and background. Where there is no argument over the fact that UCC is a great idea - question is - has the time for such a law come in India where personal beliefs are still very strong and contrary to what the mainstream media will tell you .... this law will impact ALL religions and take away things like the Hindu Undivided Family - that is used as a tax saving instrument by many.
    In this in-depth episode of the Deshbhakt - we take a look at the complex issues that surround UCC and try to break it down for you - let us know what you think!
    ⛔️ BECOME A DESHBHAKT MEMBER - / thedeshbhakt ⛔️
    Unlock MEMBER ONLY: 1) Chats 2) Discord Server 3) Special Episodes
    👕 DESHBHAKT MERCH - India's First Line of Socially & Politically aware tees 👕
    / thedeshbhakt
    📧 BUSINESS ENQUIRIES - contact (at) thedeshbhakt (dot) in 📧
    ** SUBSCRIBE / FOLLOW US **
    UA-cam: - / thedeshbhakt
    Twitter :- / thedeshbhakt
    Web - thedeshbhakt.in/
    Instagram :- / akashbanerjee.in
    Facebook :- / akashbanerjee.in
    Podcast - anchor.fm/thedeshbhakt
    Credits :
    Writer : Sumer Singh /Akash Banerjee
    Editor : Tushar Chaudhary
    Producer : Avishrant Singh
    Chapter Heads :
    0:00 - AFTER ARTICLE 370, RAM MANDIR - UCC???
    2:48 - NEED FOR A UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA
    5:21 - THE COMPLEX HISTORY OF UNIFORM CIVIL CODE
    8:45 - ARE WE READY FOR UNIFORM CIVIL CODE ?
    10:12 - HOW TO EXECUTE A SIMPLE IDEA IN A COMLEX NATION
    13:45 - CAN WE DO WITHOUT UNIFORM CIVIL CODE ??
    Resources :
    indiankanoon.org/doc/106393931/
    indianexpress.com/article/exp...
    www.indiatoday.in/fyi/story/r... -
    www.hindustantimes.com/india-...
    www.thehindu.com/news/cities/...
    timesofindia.indiatimes.com/i...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5 тис.

  • @thedeshbhakt
    @thedeshbhakt  2 роки тому +551

    This episode topic has been a constant demand from fellow DeshBhakts!!! Hope you like the work we have put into this!!! Do share / subscribe / comment!

  • @omkarghawate
    @omkarghawate 2 роки тому +1293

    For law students uniform civil code is like thanos gauntlet, 😂 50% of family law syllabus will disappear

    • @gamingcreatesworlddd2425
      @gamingcreatesworlddd2425 2 роки тому +23

      @S P kab banega sunny deol ka dialogue yaad agaya tareekh par tareekh since 35 years people talking about uniform civil code but nothing made

    • @mayapalan4184
      @mayapalan4184 2 роки тому +2

      🤣🤣

    • @ditto2509
      @ditto2509 2 роки тому +4

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 exactly 💯

    • @aakankshakhedekar1011
      @aakankshakhedekar1011 2 роки тому +4

      Exactly 😂😂😂👍

    • @aviralsrivastava4009
      @aviralsrivastava4009 2 роки тому +36

      @@gamingcreatesworlddd2425 yaad hai mandir banayenge par tareek nhi batayenge then came 5 aug ...just wait for it

  • @prabhatsourya3883
    @prabhatsourya3883 2 роки тому +529

    11:04 How is the Uniform Civil Code "secularism ka khatma"? The core philosophy of secularism is that, "No Religion is above the constitution and law of the country".

    • @Aa-zg3fc
      @Aa-zg3fc 2 роки тому +17

      Secularism give every religion freedom which will be snatched after this

    • @queenv3973
      @queenv3973 2 роки тому +77

      @@Aa-zg3fc Secularism does not equal religious freedom like you think. It means a total separation of state and religion. According to it religion is what you practice in private, you pray in your home and at your place of worship but you can not show your religious identity in public. Like you can't wear a cross or a tika or hijab or a Turban at public places. Example is France. If India starts following secularism as it is intended to be these so called self declared epitome of secularism would be the first people who will start crying.

    • @hiteshdsouza9615
      @hiteshdsouza9615 2 роки тому +27

      @@queenv3973 Well said, these people need to understand the core principle behind secularism i.e separation of state and religion.

    • @prabhatsourya3883
      @prabhatsourya3883 2 роки тому +21

      @@queenv3973 Exactly. The form of secularism adopted in India is a compromise to accommodate the will of all the different people in the country. What I meant in my comment was that in secularism, the constitution (law) will have ultimate power, and that no religion will get any exemption from the law of the country. This is in essence what is being promised in the uniform civil code. So it is not "secularism ka khatma" as said by that person at 11:04. It in fact, reinforces secularism.

    • @queenv3973
      @queenv3973 2 роки тому +10

      @@prabhatsourya3883 Agreed. I am not a BJP supporter. There is plenty wrong with that party. They have done some things right but they are a political entity so can't expect much from them . But the liberals, left and Congress have always flawed on logic. It's because of the stupidity of them that we dont have an effective opposition in the country. They were talking of Intolerance then what was emergency? They talk of secularism and constitutional values. The term was inserted by 42nd Amendment. So which values the 1950 one or the amended ones? UCC was desired for India by the makers of the constitution under article 44. So who is undermining constitutional value by going against UCC? Same with prohibition of cattle slaughter. It's kind of ironic that these people want to protect religions that were born outside India by sidelining the ones that were born in India!

  • @nawazshaik438
    @nawazshaik438 2 роки тому +108

    Stop Gender Discrimination by saying Tradition/Religion, Everyone is equal before Law either Civil/Criminal matter
    Implement UCC: Jai Hind

    • @syed.hidayath
      @syed.hidayath Рік тому

      What do you think, what is religion

    • @Mdmd-eq8ms
      @Mdmd-eq8ms Рік тому

      in UCC lets make hijab compulsory for all women.. r hindus ready now to accept ucc ??? so in this case.. if constitution is above religion then, Ram should be hanged bcoz he tourcher sita and burn her alive..and not given rights to love and kush..his son.. . why not introduce DNA card ? 100% hindus dna has matched dna of african the closet is andaman nicobar african dna...

    • @amitarora7466
      @amitarora7466 Рік тому +4

      End reservation before UCC .. fir dekho Hindu kitne ek hain 🤣😂🤣😂

    • @nawazshaik438
      @nawazshaik438 Рік тому +4

      @@syed.hidayath Constitution is the religion 🇮🇳

    • @nawazshaik438
      @nawazshaik438 Рік тому +2

      @@amitarora7466 no hindu no muslim no Christian only indian speaks🇮🇳

  • @Ahmed_Mohiuddin
    @Ahmed_Mohiuddin Рік тому +43

    As a Feminist, I Clearly Support Uniform Civil Code [UCC] Cause, it Empowers Women, & Provides Equality to Every Citizen of India [Regardless Of their Gender, Religious laws, etc...]

    • @trailerbreeze3249
      @trailerbreeze3249 Рік тому +4

      When did ABDUL became feminist?
      Have you abandoned your 4 Wives?😅

    • @ludicrousreality0
      @ludicrousreality0 Рік тому +1

      accha 14 saal ka baccha gyan de raha ha yahan

    • @MuskanKhan-dn3jt
      @MuskanKhan-dn3jt Рік тому

      ​@@ludicrousreality0wo bacha tere pet me bi bacha paida kar sakta hau

    • @MuskanKhan-dn3jt
      @MuskanKhan-dn3jt Рік тому

      ​@@trailerbreeze3249yes he did including your wife too

    • @amitarora7466
      @amitarora7466 Рік тому

      Feminist = misuse of law to attain everything .. !

  • @Harshdeep_._._Singh
    @Harshdeep_._._Singh 2 роки тому +1227

    uniform civil code is secularism in true sence

    • @randomvers4510
      @randomvers4510 2 роки тому +129

      Vo log Nahi manegy Bhai🤫🤫

    • @sarcasticzain8286
      @sarcasticzain8286 2 роки тому +29

      True

    • @peaceful891
      @peaceful891 2 роки тому +119

      Abaa nahi manenge😂

    • @andhakanoon88
      @andhakanoon88 2 роки тому +40

      The principle of secularism is that it allows all sects of people to enjoy their right and practice their religion and culture respectively. UCC is not possible in India whatever it takes because it is much complex than we think it is

    • @AyushMishra-rq8xp
      @AyushMishra-rq8xp 2 роки тому +72

      @@andhakanoon88 article 44 part 4 of the constitution says about the implementation of Uniform Civil code.
      Will it be ok If India does not follow its own constitution??? Miya

  • @KhanBhai-rj3ny
    @KhanBhai-rj3ny 2 роки тому +96

    Yes, it is necessary to implement UCC right now

  • @andy8357
    @andy8357 2 роки тому +14

    India should follow the UCC that's practised in West.

  • @bhartisingh3466
    @bhartisingh3466 2 роки тому +40

    "Seculars", "liberals" and "intellectuals" who talk about "Article 14" day in day out keep contradicting themselves.
    True equality will come only if laws are made for "Indians" not on religion basis.
    Post partition, some relaxation to minorities made some sense for allowing them time to adjust to "new independent India" without threat and give them time to assimilate with the majority.
    But over a period of time, when these very laws (370, personal laws, minority commission), were politicised a sense of "separate identity" became stronger instead of the sense of "co-existence.
    When BJP points out at such things, it is called "communal". But BJP is just the "effect" not the "cause" of identity politics.
    When all parties started practicing Congresses successful "muslim identity politics" for votes, BJP found its scope in counter consolidation.
    Muslims standard of life has only downgraded since 1947 because Congress could not gather courage to make them progressive. If "secular" parties genuinely did "secular" politics, BJP would not have gotten a chance.
    In 21st century, need to move on as "Indians" to counter 21st century issues and not remain stuck past in time to handle issues of 1947.

    • @aldenpadilla1773
      @aldenpadilla1773 2 роки тому +1

      Kashmir wanted independence that's why article 370 was needed to not let them get out of India. They wanted a referendrum since 1947 and if a referendrum happens, most kashmiris would vote to leave India.

  • @somenchoudhury2611
    @somenchoudhury2611 2 роки тому +422

    Congress didn't implement UCC due to their own political gain.

    • @ajoysharma4719
      @ajoysharma4719 2 роки тому +23

      True

    • @aamir-khan
      @aamir-khan 2 роки тому +5

      @Debanil Chanda please don't bring the name game and religion in the arguments. This shows your anti-muslim mentality.
      And if you ask me, if i support UCC cause it is the essence of secularism.
      My answer will be, yes i support it.
      But the India is not ready for it now.
      It will take years for implementation of it.
      Because our countrymen regardless of religion are very conservative like you.

    • @mohnishm1372
      @mohnishm1372 2 роки тому +11

      @@aamir-khan Most of the conservative people would die in next 40 years tbh. this is the right time to implement UCC.

    • @jcharubhatt
      @jcharubhatt 2 роки тому +8

      @@aamir-khan why isn't india ready now...huh when will it be ready acc to you?...UCC was first hinted by our courts years before as need of tge hour....to abhi tk tym nhi aya to kb ayega?

    • @liberalman9357
      @liberalman9357 2 роки тому +1

      @@aamir-khan exactly in order to not bring Religion everywhere UCC is needed

  • @colacobenecia101999
    @colacobenecia101999 2 роки тому +286

    Goa has had UCC for a very long time. It helps record marriages easily.

    • @truthseekerIndian
      @truthseekerIndian 2 роки тому +5

      Goa ucc explained by Faizan Mustafa .. must watch

    • @zubincardozo9755
      @zubincardozo9755 2 роки тому +21

      Yep and we Goans are proud of it

    • @sharanbasavrevshette2490
      @sharanbasavrevshette2490 2 роки тому +4

      Nice

    • @sharanbasavrevshette2490
      @sharanbasavrevshette2490 2 роки тому +3

      7

    • @jaspershoral8037
      @jaspershoral8037 2 роки тому +30

      That is fine, but why does Goa UCC allow men to marry another woman if his present wife doesn't give birth to a 'boy' child?
      Birth of girl or boy is totally dependant on men chromosomes, So why is this impractical law still being promoted?

  • @goutamdass6243
    @goutamdass6243 2 роки тому +18

    I have two questions about how the following two practices would be treated/handled if & when UCC is implemented:
    A.) Among Tamilian Hindus, a common practice is marriage between uncle (mama, mother’s brother) and niece (bhagni, sister’s daughter). Will this be abolished or will this be made valid across all sections of Hindus and among other religions too?
    B.) In Islam, a common practice is marriage among first cousins (brother A’s son/daughter can marry brother B’s daughter/son. Will this be abolished or made legally valid for all religions?

    • @thedeshbhakt
      @thedeshbhakt  2 роки тому +17

      Excellent points - no simple answers ….. you understand exactly why UCC has not been implemented despite clear majority- because we live in a complex society

    • @superheroesclab5153
      @superheroesclab5153 Рік тому +2

      Don’t don’t spared false statement..
      Bhagni, sister's daughter /son marriage is Haram.
      But Muslim can marry Uncle's daughter /son

    • @c.selvarajhunc.rajhun7021
      @c.selvarajhunc.rajhun7021 Рік тому

      ​@@superheroesclab5153nah according to shafi you can marry even your illegitimate daughter welcome to islam

    • @anwaargajdharanwaargajdhar8090
      @anwaargajdharanwaargajdhar8090 Рік тому +1

      You are right spread this type of knowledge among people may God bless you
      Gather more knowledge of Islam ❤❤❤

    • @indiantiger6729
      @indiantiger6729 Рік тому

      ​@@thedeshbhaktmrpesudo secular andhbhakt of liberalism. I am a true atheist liberal I am telling u UCC is a secular option if ur open minded person becoz ur scared of muslims u favour them a true secular will always stay neutral

  • @rayeesmd539
    @rayeesmd539 Рік тому +4

    Good job brother. Proud to know you are doing your contribution towards the country and the people by educating.

  • @hemantojha2850
    @hemantojha2850 2 роки тому +1123

    During CAA : how can u discriminate with a particular religion.
    During UCC : how can u treat all religion as same.
    😒

    • @aryanverma8344
      @aryanverma8344 2 роки тому +38

      Actually it's hard to counter many religious people
      America did it years ago
      But there are many Khattar Hindus,Khattar Muslims who prefers old way
      It's a good idea but needs time to avoid a civil war

    • @hemantojha2850
      @hemantojha2850 2 роки тому +210

      @@aryanverma8344 lol hindus are way more progressive...don't equate hindus with muslims....islam is the most regressive religion
      ..israel : jews vs muslim
      India : hindu vs muslims
      Myanmar : buddhism vs Muslim
      France : atheist vs muslim
      Arab : muslim vs muslim
      Islam is the only regressive and worst religion.

    • @aryanverma8344
      @aryanverma8344 2 роки тому +44

      @@hemantojha2850 yeah I guess you can speak for all 100+ crores of Hindu
      Bro just come out of your house and see for yourself instead of being a keyboard warrior
      We Hindu's are progressing?
      Some are no doubt but not all.
      Care to explain honour killing and caste discrimination that still happens?
      I am not siding with Islam they too have their issues
      It's a big step and need a time we can't afford another protest in this corona time

    • @haragopal1
      @haragopal1 2 роки тому +131

      @@aryanverma8344 Hindus are supporting for UCC .... it's a good thing , progressive I guess

    • @allinone-crickettravelfun2900
      @allinone-crickettravelfun2900 2 роки тому +92

      @@aryanverma8344 Hindus are progressive for sure and still are. That is the reason when we were in the over whelming majority, we were ok with being secular even after being ruled and oppressed for 1000 years from 1191 AD till 1947. We didn’t ask for Hindu republic even after losing 30% of land mass on religious basis. Hindus practised sati, untouchability till 50!years ago. You don’t see sati anymore . Untouchability has been compensated by providing reservations. I accept that still there is so much to change but we kept moving forward . Cant be said the same about the religion in discussion. I don’t even have to mention the name. Tell me one thing that is progressive , make chauvinism, divorce , dressing ,education system , killing people in the name of religion , u name it .

  • @imtoo7474
    @imtoo7474 2 роки тому +251

    CAA: We are one;
    UCC: How so?

  • @saunitparmar9732
    @saunitparmar9732 2 роки тому +11

    Akash Sir,
    we must need UCC and population control bill to be followed strictly, bhale wo politics kar ke aaye . . ., we dont want another Kashmir and Afghanistan in India . ..
    bahot pahle aa jana chahiye tha ye, pahle wali sarkar kyu nahi laayi ye ?

  • @user-pp3wi6vb1g
    @user-pp3wi6vb1g 2 роки тому +4

    If you wait for something till everyone is ready, you will keep waiting. Indian society was not ready for 377, but it was removed, which is good as it paved the way for future change. Same thing here.

  • @yashagrawal88
    @yashagrawal88 2 роки тому +150

    9:40 2 illogical arguments - 1) Lack of homogeneity or rather presence of the conflicts does not mean that UCC will not be possible to implement or beneficial. 2) Laws don't solve all problems but it does not mean that we don't need good/right laws.

    • @cutiserzero963
      @cutiserzero963 2 роки тому +12

      Implementation is all tha matters

    • @ashitdhiman1410
      @ashitdhiman1410 2 роки тому +48

      Lowkey this guy can't digest that this law is introduced by BJP government

    • @neverdead6529
      @neverdead6529 2 роки тому

      Ias officer 🤡🤡

  • @anandrai9767
    @anandrai9767 2 роки тому +602

    Without any biased thought, I completely support uniform civil court we all should come under a single umbrella of law we all should support as an Indian 👳

    • @user-iy2ud1ki4l
      @user-iy2ud1ki4l 2 роки тому +2

      I agree

    • @hritikrathore2019
      @hritikrathore2019 2 роки тому +1

      @Jio Boy abe kuch selective tweets ko leke backchodi kar raha he ye banda ucc is good...bhai by law ek muslim ladka ek se jyada ladkiyo se shadi kar sakta he pr hindu nhi to bhaiya inequality ko khatm krne ke liye UCC lao tabhi interreligious marriage ko promote kro ya fir love zihad law bane to chikhne mt lgo.. ready he ya nhi ye kya bevkoofi he ideal situation to Kabhi Nahi aati

    • @rudrankpatel379
      @rudrankpatel379 2 роки тому +13

      Beta 2018 law commission ki report padho. As a law student I'm telling you UCC is not that easy as it seems and Indian society isn't ready for it

    • @shashanksingh763
      @shashanksingh763 2 роки тому +19

      @@hritikrathore2019 Ya bs bjp ka agenda . Es sa jada reservation affect karta wo hatao

    • @shashanksingh763
      @shashanksingh763 2 роки тому +1

      @Up Down Jis din competition ki tyar kroge smjh jaoge q keh rha

  • @kings2488
    @kings2488 2 роки тому +10

    I just watch his video to know . How any man can turn truth into lie 🤨🤨🤨

    • @Himanshukumar-ek7fh
      @Himanshukumar-ek7fh 2 роки тому +1

      Blindness had no limit.

    • @abhinaysingh8306
      @abhinaysingh8306 Рік тому

      true, aur ye khudko secular bolte hai
      inke liye secularism ka matlab hi muslim appeasement
      modi muslim appeasement nahi karta wo fasicts ho gaya
      jaise tumne parliament wala video dekha, usme bhi isne kaha hi modi ka saryantra hai, modi southern india ka seats kam karna chahata hai
      abhi tak govenment ne bataya bhi nahi ki seats kaise change honge lekin isko pahle hi saryantra dikh gaya

    • @abhinaysingh8306
      @abhinaysingh8306 Рік тому

      @@Himanshukumar-ek7fh true

  • @AS-dn5ur
    @AS-dn5ur 2 роки тому +7

    Muslimo ka aap hi jaise kuch log saath dete hai aapko allah Barkat de..allah hu akbar

  • @abhisheksarkar1390
    @abhisheksarkar1390 2 роки тому +572

    Twist in the plot: Maximum Hindus don't know Hindu personal law exists...LOL

    • @thedeshbhakt
      @thedeshbhakt  2 роки тому +186

      :) - i dont think many will be happy when Hindu Undivided Family practice will have to go

    • @AnitaKumari-oj4mi
      @AnitaKumari-oj4mi 2 роки тому +220

      @@thedeshbhakt sare Madarson koo band kr do... 😂😂😂

    • @zaid2139
      @zaid2139 2 роки тому +60

      @@Anshul93798 Mandir band karoge to share Hindu chup rhenge na

    • @HanumanManMohan
      @HanumanManMohan 2 роки тому +103

      @@zaid2139 suno government paise se chalne wale band ho ok

    • @shdr1793
      @shdr1793 2 роки тому +104

      @@zaid2139 are bhai masjid nhi ... Wo madrasa band krneko bola

  • @baidurjyaduarah9444
    @baidurjyaduarah9444 2 роки тому +97

    Akash Banerjee: I am secular
    also Akash Banerjee:I oppose equal LAW for every religion....LAW should be according to their religion.

    • @Shubhampandey-mz1eu
      @Shubhampandey-mz1eu 2 роки тому +5

      Exactly

    • @__Man__
      @__Man__ 2 роки тому +9

      Actually, Banerjee's idea is a real secular. What are you talking about uniforming people is not secular, it is a laïcité, usually laïcité is implemented by ultra-nationalist groups

    • @defencenpolitics2719
      @defencenpolitics2719 2 роки тому +1

      @@__Man__ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @__Man__
      @__Man__ 2 роки тому +1

      @@defencenpolitics2719 do you support real secularism or laïcité secularism?

    • @samsan3401
      @samsan3401 2 роки тому +11

      @@__Man__ There's a clash of religious freedom and human rights. Should Sati have been allowed in the name of tradition and secularism? Nope.
      Stagnant regressive personal laws being followed like doctrines is bad, and doing so in the name of liberalism and secularism is irony.

  • @roleplayinglife7548
    @roleplayinglife7548 2 роки тому +4

    As nationalist I support Uniform Civil Code with no religious community having a leeway over another

  • @trollthetroller2
    @trollthetroller2 2 роки тому +652

    I am not a Modi supporter....but I believe that UCC must be implemented in a democracy 🙏🏼

    • @Idk-ks4ch
      @Idk-ks4ch 2 роки тому +62

      I'm a modi supporter and i support UCC.

    • @trollthetroller2
      @trollthetroller2 2 роки тому +25

      @@Idk-ks4ch Excellent 👌🏼somewhere the lines do cross👍🏼

    • @mohitshyamdasani2459
      @mohitshyamdasani2459 2 роки тому +31

      but opposition and haters will always oppose 😂

    • @morenmorefoodflavours
      @morenmorefoodflavours 2 роки тому +7

      Idiots will accept this when u have all rights given in constitution y UCC....DESH KO ITNA KALE KHADDE MAIN DALDIYA ..KAAFI NAHIN HAIN.

    • @trollthetroller2
      @trollthetroller2 2 роки тому

      @@morenmorefoodflavours Do you even know what it is ??
      ...it will remove all religious laws and replace it with scientific and human rights with equal rights/laws for each citizen irrespective of their religion or caste. Do you know how backward the laws are for Christian widows in India for example? First study about all the laws in each religion of India, then you will understand.....only those idiots and fanatics who want to impose their supremacy over weaker classes like women within their own religion will not want UCC.

  • @hellobabyReeva
    @hellobabyReeva 2 роки тому +380

    Yesss...India is so diverse that we can't maintain different law for every community.
    We need one. Please don't deviate the topic to polarization.

    • @siddhanthshetty177
      @siddhanthshetty177 2 роки тому +24

      If one's ideology is an anti of any ideology/party, Even if an ideology/party does something better for society, they are compelled to oppose it, since his/hers ideology is anti of the latter. Same is happening here. Since He is an anti-BJP/Modi, it is compelling him to say such words. Same issue goes with so called "leftists" also. They just abandon everything said by MODI/BJP, Hence making the left wing eco-system weak. That' s why it is better to be a critic of an ideology/party rather than being a pro/anti.

    • @siddhanthshetty177
      @siddhanthshetty177 2 роки тому +3

      @Behemoth Bro, stop labelling me. Idk, it is common fad now that if someone says something about which one will be offended, they will immediately start Labelling. Around 10 min interval he talked about polarization. He is trying to convey that UCC doesnot will not have any impact on people bcs polarization will still be present. Polarization is a different topic. Why has that got to do with UCC?. BTW, I din't say he is completely wrong or something like that. I was conveying if one is an anti of an ideology, he/she will try to find something which will not suit them and highlight as if it is a big thing.

    • @jenjungkuk7130
      @jenjungkuk7130 Рік тому +3

      Hello bhakt he's not driving the UCC into polarisation rather he's just saying slowly and steadily execution due to the diversity of communities in India won't be able to accept immediately
      In these case you are the anti ideological one✌

    • @farazahmed9254
      @farazahmed9254 Рік тому +1

      You are making a point by saying India is a diverse country and again refuting yourself by saying we need Uniform Civil Code........India is very diverse many religions, culture......thats why we don't need UCC

    • @Mdmd-eq8ms
      @Mdmd-eq8ms Рік тому

      in UCC lets make hijab compulsory for all women.. r hindus ready now to accept ucc ??? why not introduce DNA card ? 100% hindus dna has matched dna of african the closet is andaman nicobar african dna...

  • @minatithinks6223
    @minatithinks6223 2 роки тому +4

    हमको Uniform Civil Code Samjna Nahin Hai Lagu karna hai.

  • @moinngpro5294
    @moinngpro5294 2 роки тому +88

    I love our constitution, I support UCC 👍

  • @Aman-ns1yf
    @Aman-ns1yf 2 роки тому +496

    Let's first try this on our parliament members for 2 years. 😁

    • @tanmayghige2437
      @tanmayghige2437 2 роки тому +5

      👏

    • @ajadmohammad42
      @ajadmohammad42 2 роки тому +7

      Sahi hai 😂😂

    • @annunegi6462
      @annunegi6462 2 роки тому +13

      Gayi bhais pani me 😂

    • @tanmayghige2437
      @tanmayghige2437 2 роки тому +26

      Irony is In a so called Hindu majority country we gets a verdict for Constructing temple after so many years and it is considered as a masterstroke wah👏.
      Ab kaha gaye vo minority wale jo ye rona lgaye rehte hai " In this country we are being oppressed ".😑

    • @rohitk8797
      @rohitk8797 2 роки тому +22

      @@tanmayghige2437 usse faida kya Hua? Vrindavan me 5000+ mandir he.waha kya Sabki life quality improve hogayi?

  • @rudra9840
    @rudra9840 2 роки тому +4

    It is illogical argument that UCC is not necessary because population lacks homogeneity at present😂 As there is no need for UCC if there was homogeneity present. UCC is needed just to counter the chaos caused by personal laws of different ethnic groups.

  • @nishanttandon97
    @nishanttandon97 2 роки тому +2

    During CAA - Govt giving citizenship to "Kafir" / means people who follow other religions than Islam in islamic countries neighbouring India.
    People- aese kaese ho sakta h , hum sab ek h , sarkar dharm k naam pr baant rhi h.
    Now for UCC - Govt. treat all religions same. Demolish all other codes. Ek Rashtra Ek Kanoon.
    Same people - aese kaese ho sakta h, hum sab ek jaese thodi na h, sarkar dharm k naam pr baant rhi hai.
    Hypocrisy at its peak.

  • @proudmuslim7847
    @proudmuslim7847 2 роки тому +75

    Anti-CAA:you should treat every religion equally .
    Anti-UCC:how all religions are equal ? We have get advantage over others .( minority appeasement is important )
    Hypocrisy ki bhi seema is based on our appropriation .

    • @missphysicist2413
      @missphysicist2413 2 роки тому

      Tru

    • @proudmuslim7847
      @proudmuslim7847 2 роки тому

      @@missphysicist2413 😅😅

    • @CosmoCreed
      @CosmoCreed 2 роки тому

      Law Student to you: Tum se na ho payega beta

    • @CosmoCreed
      @CosmoCreed 2 роки тому +2

      @mr.1n5an_e Hain? Sense? How arrogant of you to consider yourself "TRUE Scholar"
      What makes you start assuming about me that I am a liberal, also what's wrong with liberalism. Have you even studied something or just WhatsApp university? Liberalism is not left wing.
      Stfu now

    • @tanaygupt9268
      @tanaygupt9268 2 роки тому +5

      @@CosmoCreed Liberals are hypocrite
      A big hypocrite

  • @rahuldubey652
    @rahuldubey652 2 роки тому +289

    UCC is a great idea in a democratic country every citizen is equal
    we should support it despite our own biases towards any side

    • @syewh7080
      @syewh7080 2 роки тому +3

      Correct for a democratic country. Now you should ask the next question. I hope you got it.

    • @aarnavsingh
      @aarnavsingh 2 роки тому +7

      Bhai if this is not democratic then what about Pakistan get the f**k out of my country if you feel it's not secular it's not democratic you will always feel problems mr. Liberandu bcoz Congress favored only muslims but BJP favours everyone

    • @sssanjana9598
      @sssanjana9598 2 роки тому +13

      @@aarnavsingh Why do u compare India's democracy with Pakistan's democracy rather than comparing it with USA's democracy.. apne se humesha upar ke sath compare karo neeche ke sath nahi

    • @dipanjanghosal1662
      @dipanjanghosal1662 2 роки тому +28

      "Modernising" Hindu personal law for progress. But no such modernization for Islam. How democratic.
      UCC will come. Bjp will deliver. Jai Shri Ram

    • @FaisalAnsari-pk9by
      @FaisalAnsari-pk9by 2 роки тому +1

      We will never accept it.
      How can gay marriage and Muslim marriage be under same thing

  • @ozimandias7866
    @ozimandias7866 2 роки тому +10

    I just love how these youtubers expose themselves they don't need others 😂😂😂

  • @UrlanaVenkatesh
    @UrlanaVenkatesh Рік тому +1

    Uniform civil law should exist and every religion should accept constitutional law.

  • @realitytouch3468
    @realitytouch3468 2 роки тому +79

    We are ready as a society for UCC and as a nation , we are craving for it for 70 years. No politics in it. It is true.

  • @earthshuman3864
    @earthshuman3864 2 роки тому +276

    Godi media is actually lucky whenever their is important Matter they get controversy as well and they talk about controversy because trp Matter most
    Example - Pegasus vs raj Kundra

    • @abasahebmane4755
      @abasahebmane4755 2 роки тому +19

      Pegasus vs raj Kundra 😂
      Koi sence hai is baat ka 😂?

    • @Abcinsane
      @Abcinsane 2 роки тому +19

      @AG AndhBhakts no logic.
      UP ppl anti beef. UP biggest exporter of beef.

    • @pyarelalsahoo8111
      @pyarelalsahoo8111 2 роки тому +23

      @@Abcinsane Bhai, ye wo bhakt hai jo har comment ka Rs 2 payment leta hai🙈

    • @pyarelalsahoo8111
      @pyarelalsahoo8111 2 роки тому

      @@abasahebmane4755 common sense hai to sense samajh jaoge

    • @sameersam3809
      @sameersam3809 2 роки тому +15

      @@Abcinsane UP is not anti beef...they are against cow slaughtering....there is difference between cow and buffalo...even buffalo is also sacrificed in Hindu culture.... nobody has any objections on bufallo meat....get some knowledge

  • @nitishpandit81
    @nitishpandit81 Рік тому +1

    UCC is a must for India, if necessary the constitution may be amended but religious supermarkt over constitution must be ended.

  • @thomaskennedy5728
    @thomaskennedy5728 2 роки тому +2

    Uniform civil code is must and for growth of a healthy society. Religion slows the progress of development. Uniform civil code would break this barrier.

  • @yatharth8074
    @yatharth8074 2 роки тому +343

    Uniform Civil Court Should be applied earlier without playing any politics.

    • @truthseekerIndian
      @truthseekerIndian 2 роки тому +6

      Ucc is against freedom of religion brother.....
      N as an indian we Opposed it...

    • @avishekkashyap1421
      @avishekkashyap1421 2 роки тому +82

      @@truthseekerIndian freedom of religion kaise? 🙄

    • @yatharth8074
      @yatharth8074 2 роки тому +81

      @@truthseekerIndian UCC is necessary for any democracy now days Anyone Can give Fatwa as Death threat which is completely wrong a real democratic person will never oppose UCC

    • @truthseekerIndian
      @truthseekerIndian 2 роки тому +6

      @@yatharth8074 no it's not necessary...it will destroy the unity...
      U don't have uniformity in india... leave aside law...
      U don't know about law n ucc but think it's necessary...
      Even in western countries minorities have there uniform law.....
      Remember Ucc is a tool to harass the minorities...n india is bunch of minorities....muslims Sikhs hindus Christian tribals etc etc...
      India is a democratic country n constitution allowed personal law...n u want to go against indian constitution???
      Think again...

    • @truthseekerIndian
      @truthseekerIndian 2 роки тому +7

      @@avishekkashyap1421 religion may kya ata hai???
      Shadi , divorce, prayers, customs etc etc...
      Or dekho kuch din pehlay babari masjid ka case astha per hua....ki wahan hindu ashta thee...or kuch din baad ucc??
      Religion important hai...uskay laws important hai...
      Laws nahi hogay toh religion kaisa bhai..
      Eg...Ucc kahayga...mandir may shadi ki koi value nahi...kya aap brhamin pujari rokhay gay marriage kay liea ??
      Nahi....phir bhi hindu Brahmin priest ko bulakar hu shadi karayga....
      Toh UCC kahan jaega

  • @Reliever
    @Reliever 2 роки тому +111

    Avengers infinity saga = what BJP promised in 2014
    Joss Whedon Justice league = what they delivered 😐

    • @Abcinsane
      @Abcinsane 2 роки тому +10

      Can we make 2024 Endgame please?🤫

    • @Reliever
      @Reliever 2 роки тому +4

      @@Abcinsane everybody wants that. 🙏

    • @ashishkumarchoubey2819
      @ashishkumarchoubey2819 2 роки тому +13

      @@Abcinsane weren't you folks trying to make 2019 Endgame?

    • @Iampa1chavan
      @Iampa1chavan 2 роки тому +2

      Soon Snyder Cut has to come

    • @Reliever
      @Reliever 2 роки тому +2

      @@Iampa1chavan Snyder cut was actually good. And if you still think BJP can do good, then you need to come out of your fantasy land. ✌️

  • @aadrath1236
    @aadrath1236 2 роки тому +2

    So glad you covered it sir 👍

  • @heil1319
    @heil1319 2 роки тому +4

    Waqf board ban hona chahiye. Without any argument.

    • @rajars4239
      @rajars4239 Рік тому +1

      godi's father also cannot ban it.

  • @anamikasinghparihar4623
    @anamikasinghparihar4623 2 роки тому +72

    It's like genuine bravado - showing confident statement... And doing nothing.... 😑

  • @hiteshgoa
    @hiteshgoa 2 роки тому +135

    Hi,
    I'm from Goa born and bought up. We are in Uniform civil code and it does make difference. I support this UCC to implement as law in our country.
    Let's hope for the best as our country is going from bad to worse.

    • @shaharukhnadaf7084
      @shaharukhnadaf7084 2 роки тому +3

      I think this promote equality... Unity 🙏

    • @star-qs7bb
      @star-qs7bb Рік тому +2

      I m also from goa

    • @Mdmd-eq8ms
      @Mdmd-eq8ms Рік тому

      in UCC lets make hijab compulsory for all women.. r hindus ready now to accept ucc ??? so in this case.. Ram should be hanged bcoz he tourcher sita and burn her alive..and not given rights to love and kush..his son.. . why not introduce DNA card ? 100% hindus dna has matched dna of african the closet is andaman nicobar african dna...

  • @rudra20048
    @rudra20048 2 роки тому +27

    Complete brainwashed, how can he oppose every BJP's plan.
    So biased

  • @manmohanrout3083
    @manmohanrout3083 2 роки тому +2

    Good episode, worth watching, Provided details of laws and constitutional provision s there in.

  • @divyendushekhar2884
    @divyendushekhar2884 2 роки тому +104

    I think if someone does a great job we should appreciate it. we should appreciate the initiative of the UP Govt on population control.

    • @MZ-pz5ss
      @MZ-pz5ss 2 роки тому +15

      @AG har jagah bhai tu ek hi message chipka raha hai..
      Kitne milte hai bhai per msg?😂😂

    • @MZ-pz5ss
      @MZ-pz5ss 2 роки тому +4

      @AG *Ab to sach bol de bhai* mujhe bhi paise kamana hai ghar baithe... 😂

    • @divyendushekhar2884
      @divyendushekhar2884 2 роки тому +1

      @AG Abe oo, mahan insaan maine population control or UCC ke favor mein bola hai , tu sach mein gadha hai , bhai tu article or RC padhna shuru kar uss se tko tone pakdna seekh lega

    • @divyendushekhar2884
      @divyendushekhar2884 2 роки тому

      @AG yehe to problem hai tumhare or haan ye meme padhne se acha thode books or article padh loo jayeda ache understanding ho jayege ye meme se bas time pass hoga or kuch nahe, but kisi ke upar majak banene se phle 2 baar soch lia karo.tumhra ndu sabko shamjh aa rha hai.

    • @divyendushekhar2884
      @divyendushekhar2884 2 роки тому

      @AG do you think that I would be adamant about Modi, why should I, In laconic words, we will support those who work for economic development, who work for health care, who work for education, who believes in humanity instead of religion.

  • @aryushsrivastava2276
    @aryushsrivastava2276 2 роки тому +251

    Sir, thought I am a left wing supporter I think uniform civil code is actually a good initiative by the government as it might be the first step to promoting atheism in India which is the need of the hour, the emphasis on religion has caused us more damage than good be it communal violence or the oppression of women, religion needs to be a very intimate and personal choice rather than creating a disgusting business out of which we have seen in the past, thought I am subscriber of you but I politely disagree with you in this case.

    • @expertgaming8903
      @expertgaming8903 2 роки тому +12

      Well atheism is very bad for a society

    • @Anshul93798
      @Anshul93798 2 роки тому +65

      @@expertgaming8903 atheism is growing very fast

    • @savepalestineuyghurs7735
      @savepalestineuyghurs7735 2 роки тому +6

      Athiestic societies are nihilistic societies so... No other countries seem to poke thier shit into others businesses except for India

    • @Anshul93798
      @Anshul93798 2 роки тому +41

      @@expertgaming8903 how is it bad than spread of Christmas and kattar islam

    • @Anshul93798
      @Anshul93798 2 роки тому +8

      @@expertgaming8903 just asking ppz don't cancel me

  • @shoebfarhad
    @shoebfarhad Рік тому +2

    UCC: Unbiased Creative Content implementation by Deshbhakt channel 👌

  • @syedellias5730
    @syedellias5730 Рік тому +1

    You are right that this issue is very complicated.. All wise judicial men from all sects must discuss before implementation..

  • @chetan1udfh
    @chetan1udfh 2 роки тому +26

    Sir, you missed one important thing, the UCC as you said was basic priority during transfer of power by UK to India.
    And as you said, it's complicated, and Hence Dr Ambedkar tried to make Hindu Society Better incl Jain's Sikhs Buddhists by drafting Hindu Code Bill, opposed by Hindu mahasabha, and Nehru tried to dilute it, and Dr Ambedkar resigned, and Nehru divided the bill into 4 parts

  • @themkeyline2359
    @themkeyline2359 2 роки тому +21

    Biggest Problem with Modi Government is that they pass any law without spreading awareness about it in the public. It creates a kind of debate between agreed people and disagreed people. They should atleast tell the *Janta* about what they are planning so that we could be ready for it

    • @RohitYadav-oq3fj
      @RohitYadav-oq3fj Рік тому +2

      Everybody knows about it since 2019. They gave almost 4 years to understand.

  • @adhyayansingh18
    @adhyayansingh18 Рік тому +2

    We don't need UCC. We need Hindu Rasta 🚩🚩

  • @zamirahmed2304
    @zamirahmed2304 2 роки тому +2

    Salute from Pakistan for speaking the truth. I never herd any hate speech or lie from your channel. Deserve my subscription. However desh bahgt awakes in you here and there. "Per itna chalta hea😂😂😂👍👍❤❤

  • @debdutta7569
    @debdutta7569 2 роки тому +291

    I would love too see Desknhkats reaction when modi govt wins on 2024 🤣😂😁

    • @amanupadhyaynitk3292
      @amanupadhyaynitk3292 2 роки тому +35

      its not about party favor its about the country, development of country and happiness of citizens

    • @shreeramshinde8492
      @shreeramshinde8492 2 роки тому +5

      Itna concerned toh mai toh mere gf se bhi nahi hu ki me itne aage me liye exited

    • @aryanverma8344
      @aryanverma8344 2 роки тому +4

      Modi can't contest 2024 election so he will have Yogi Adityanath stand it
      And that's the beginning of a hindu Pakistan where religion will be placed above law

    • @dpxy1599
      @dpxy1599 2 роки тому

      @@KluasMikelson 🤣🤣

    • @user-hw8no2ol8k
      @user-hw8no2ol8k 2 роки тому +1

      Its obvous (BJP in 2024)as you got beaten by belt from parents if you got bad marsk.

  • @ChandrakantTurkane
    @ChandrakantTurkane 2 роки тому +26

    Dr.babasaheb Ambedkar is a visionary Leader.❤️

    • @ChandrakantTurkane
      @ChandrakantTurkane 2 роки тому +1

      @I Know right

    • @abhinaysingh8306
      @abhinaysingh8306 Рік тому +1

      he was very visionary leader. he already warned india in past that we are democracy and we should align towards west than communist like ussr and china but nehru didn't listened him.

  • @ajadmohammad42
    @ajadmohammad42 2 роки тому +2

    Our history is just awesome time nikal ke jaane ki koshish zarur kare
    Modern history
    Freedom struggle
    Post independence
    Ancient history
    Medival history
    Maza aa jayega

  • @souravbera1428
    @souravbera1428 2 роки тому +2

    India needs UCC .......

  • @xavierspapa4069
    @xavierspapa4069 2 роки тому +395

    “Our Supreme leader is the biggest Joker India has ever produced.”

    • @perrytheplatypus199
      @perrytheplatypus199 2 роки тому +3

      Jamila itna bara achievement UNESCO ne certify nehi kiya abtak. Ya Neheru ki sazish hey

    • @Anshul93798
      @Anshul93798 2 роки тому +14

      Bro deshbhakt ne tak bjp law ko oppose nahi kiya toh tun kaha se paida hua hain re

    • @Anshul93798
      @Anshul93798 2 роки тому +22

      Jaakar dhruv rathee hi dekh 😂

    • @hrushikeshsingh830
      @hrushikeshsingh830 2 роки тому +4

      Modi rahul dono joker

    • @alokranjan6333
      @alokranjan6333 2 роки тому +4

      Haha our supreme leader is a "Joker of Animal Kingdom"...🤣

  • @thesharpbudbak3046
    @thesharpbudbak3046 2 роки тому +47

    Constitution is 'same'
    IPC is 'same'
    CRPC is 'same'
    Civil code is "DIFFERENT"

    • @KingKhan-dq2bh
      @KingKhan-dq2bh 2 роки тому +5

      Because Family laws are derived from religion and people adhere to it & obviously it is different in every religion..
      I feel instead of bringing UCC, Personal laws to be changed or modified when necessary with the proper solution within community..

    • @KingKhan-dq2bh
      @KingKhan-dq2bh 2 роки тому

      @beast .
      It will contradict with the religious practices as every religion has its own family sysytem..
      Very difficult even for non muslims.. It will effect all..
      Note: if you have any valid point or thought then only reply to my comment plss..

    • @subhashishbagchi2569
      @subhashishbagchi2569 2 роки тому +3

      @@KingKhan-dq2bh IF FAMILY LAWS ARE DELIVERED BY RELIGION THAN HOW COME INDIA IS SECULAR COUNTRY THAN, THIS TOTALLY EXPOSED THAT INDIA'S SECULARISM IS DIFFERENT COMPARE TO OTHER SECULAR NATIONS.

    • @KingKhan-dq2bh
      @KingKhan-dq2bh 2 роки тому

      @@subhashishbagchi2569
      Family laws are between the few people of same group (not collective or common).
      It is for the families within community.
      Indian constitution respects and protects the individuals customs and beliefs like India has many customs and rituals and beliefs so on..
      Indian constitution protects them all and provide the separate space for family law..
      When any person or group of person are not happy or satisfied with the personal law, they can choose to go to the civil court..
      I suggest you get some deeper knowledge from reading rather than comments.
      Good day..

    • @subhashishbagchi2569
      @subhashishbagchi2569 2 роки тому +2

      @@KingKhan-dq2bh THERE ARE TWO CHOICE
      WHETHER YOUR NATION FOLLOW RELIGION OR IT FOLLOWS CONSTITUTION.
      BEING SECULAR MEANS: SEPARATION OF CHURCH FROM STATE AFFAIRS. A COUNTRY WHERE PERSONAL LAW BOARDS OF DIFFERENT RELIGION EXIST AND CALLING ITSELF SECULAR NATION IS ITSELF A JOKE ON DEFINITION OF SECULARISM
      UNIFORM CIVIL CODE MEANS : ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 44 for the citizens The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.
      IF INDIA IS TRULY A SECULAR COUNTRY WHERE PEOPLE, FAMILES AND COMMUNITIES GIVEN EQUAL SOCIAL RIGHTS THEN IT MUST ADOPT UCC OR ITS DECALRE ITSELF AS A NON SECULAR STATE.
      I WISH YOU SHOULD HAVE BETTER KNOWLEDGE ABOUT OUR CONSTITUTION AND TRY TO READ ARTICLE 44 AND UNDERSTAND IT PROPERLY.

  • @rakeshjha00
    @rakeshjha00 Рік тому +3

    I would request every UPSC aspirants and the bureaucrats as well to watch this channel because the content delivery and the quality of content is superb. Moreover the articulation in the form of satire is icing on the cake. Thank you so much for unflinching and tireless efforts. In general it's a substitute to the materials available on current important topics including Essay paper. Keep up. My best wishes are with you. It caters equally the needs of the candidates preparing for the competitive exams and the common individual in general. Thanks a lot again.

  • @gokulbalagopal1680
    @gokulbalagopal1680 2 роки тому +2

    Uniform civil code is about religion and all Indian religions are under Hindu law, diversity is about language and culture and not about religion, Uniform civil code will not harm diversity

  • @indrayad
    @indrayad 2 роки тому +1

    Ar 370 and ram mandir were also termed as impossible..

  • @Sunshine-fn3uj
    @Sunshine-fn3uj 2 роки тому +17

    This law is must for half the population.. for women..

  • @_An_Indian
    @_An_Indian 2 роки тому +79

    I think Mr Banerjee himself has to decide whether he would accept UCC, if imposed

    • @_An_Indian
      @_An_Indian 2 роки тому +9

      @An Earthian It is always easy to criticise. My Q is why not any of the earlier governments implemented UCC? If we agree that UCC is required then earlier govts must own the discredit too. Do not you see any development in last 5 years? Let us not be so intolerant that we jump to criticise on issues which could not be addressed/solved in 72 years would be so in only 6 years

    • @_An_Indian
      @_An_Indian 2 роки тому +4

      @An Earthian I do not blindly support BJP. Yes, unemployment is an issue that needs to be addressed. So you to be courageous and come out with what goods have happened in past 6 years. Do you think employment was not an issue with the country earlier? Yes it has always been an issue post independence. Now coming to GDP; pandemic due to Covid 19 has made a sizeable dent to even richest economies of the world. Do you think India could have avoided that? Moreover, the amount of govt money pilfered during 2004-2014 will definitely remain as scars in our economy for some more time

    • @_An_Indian
      @_An_Indian 2 роки тому +1

      @An Earthian You have skipped answering me. OK....well simple math tells 72>>>6. So.....hope u understand

    • @adamyabisht19
      @adamyabisht19 2 роки тому +5

      भाई मुझे नहीं लगता की मोदी सरकार के बाद ही बेरोजगारी बढ़ी है । बल्कि मोदी सरकार के आने के बाद privatization बड़ी है । बेरोजगारी तो पहले से ही थी भारत में और वैसे भी इस टाइम के यूथ फालतू के काम करने में बिजी रहते हैं , मैं भी ।🙃 कोई अपने फ्यूचर के बारे में सीरीयस नहीं है । मेरे पापा भी यही कहते हैं की नौकरी की तो कोई कमी नहीं है बस आदमी को महनती होना पड़ेगा । अगर मैं अपने आस पास का एग्जाम्पल दूं तो जितने भी मेरे भाई बहिन ने महनत की वो कुछ ना कुछ काम कर ही रहें है कोई आर्मी में है कोई रेलवेज में तो कोई प्राइवेट कंपनी में और जो मेरे रिलेटिव मस्ती करते रह गए वो 24-26 के होते हुए कुछ नहीं कर रहे । मैं उनकी कोई disrispect नहीं कर रहा🙏 पर फिर भी जो सच है वो यही है।

    • @_An_Indian
      @_An_Indian 2 роки тому +4

      @An Earthian I told that I am not blindly support BJP. Why cant I call you as a Congress Andhbhakt? People like you deliberately ignore the looting of govt properties/money in 70 years of ruling by the Congis

  • @vineetkumaryadav8341
    @vineetkumaryadav8341 Рік тому +3

    Sorry to disagree with you Akash on this topic, UCC must be implemented as it promotes the secularism in true sense. I do agree that there are other important things to be done as a part of directive principal, but UCC is also one of them. These kinds of things take time to penetrate into social fabric, but it doesn't mean that we should not take a step about it.

    • @shreeshabhatyoutube4795
      @shreeshabhatyoutube4795 Рік тому

      Hindu cow piss drinking Bhakt spotted 🤦‍♂️

    • @gitanjalisingh2240
      @gitanjalisingh2240 Рік тому +1

      @@shreeshabhatyoutube4795 follower of Chuslam called Chuslim spotted....Abdul come with real I'd

  • @Tararampam2616
    @Tararampam2616 2 роки тому +1

    UCC needs to be implemented....

  • @subhonilbanerjee6735
    @subhonilbanerjee6735 2 роки тому +16

    Probably one of the best episodes ever produced by The Deshbhakt...So much research behind one episode ❤️❤️

  • @pardeeptandon
    @pardeeptandon 2 роки тому +268

    In the Last 7 years, our Muslim Neighbour Bangladesh has improved its standard of living, improved its nutrition and public health (Article 47) to become better than that of India. While our government has been busy in Muslim Bashing.

    • @rorschach1609
      @rorschach1609 2 роки тому +1

      😂😂😂

    • @satyamthakur1126
      @satyamthakur1126 2 роки тому +98

      Yes absolutely, even I suggest illegal Bangladeshi immigrants should go back to their country which is much prosperous.

    • @devgru4543
      @devgru4543 2 роки тому +11

      Over the last seven years, the fundamentalist has butchered hundreds of people, majority of them were Hindus, also they didn't spare Muslim professors who are pro science and athiest/ex-muslim and Muslim activists who support homosexuality and equal rights. Inspite of their accelerated growth the influx of Muslims(economic reasons) and Hindus(just to stay alive) never stopped in Assam and it's neighbouring state.

    • @justanotherview3243
      @justanotherview3243 2 роки тому +34

      @@satyamthakur1126 Why stop at that? I would even suggest all the muslims who feel that they don't have a chance of prosperity in India to move to better living conditions in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Surely, these countries were formed specifically for the subcontinental Muslims. They'll find better a life there. :)

    • @Abcinsane
      @Abcinsane 2 роки тому +5

      @Chandan Matho Then people will be discriminated based on caste....

  • @aishwaryaarak6602
    @aishwaryaarak6602 Рік тому

    Can't believe it's been a year yet nothing has changed!

  • @sadaf243
    @sadaf243 Рік тому +1

    I agree with UCC is important and needs to be implemented, however, the way these laws are implemented is seen as a way of overpowering a section of this society by people and politicians, and making the minorities insecure, leading to further division, that's why its a problem right now. These events plant seeds to hatred and never go down in history as a reason to any conflict and yet it drives emotions of people leading to chaos and conflict

  • @saikatganguly221
    @saikatganguly221 2 роки тому +79

    I strongly support uniform civil code 🇮🇳
    One of the goals of Dr. B.R Ambedkar was to create (UCC) but it is not yet complete......😞

    • @rini6847
      @rini6847 2 роки тому +3

      I agree too. It will remove casteism and everybody will be considered equal in India whether Dalit, Hindu or muslim.

    • @sameersam3809
      @sameersam3809 2 роки тому +3

      minority nahi maante hain

    • @Mine_The_World
      @Mine_The_World 2 роки тому +8

      @@sameersam3809 kisne bola minorities nahi maante hai
      If government did good work then they appreciate them too
      But this government using this law to because they want vote for next election
      In 2019 , article 370 also over in kashmir before election and after election they brought nrc and caa to trouble muslim minorities
      Government always trying to do great work before election but afterward they changed there colour like GIRGIT

    • @saikatganguly221
      @saikatganguly221 2 роки тому +3

      @@rini6847 I also think the barrier of castism & religion should be destroyed..... And we all should prefer humanity before castism...✊🇮🇳

    • @saikatganguly221
      @saikatganguly221 2 роки тому +1

      @@Mine_The_World radical Muslims are completely against BJP not because they don't like BJP'S policy....
      Only because opposition's are trying to grab the Muslim vote bank by threatening Muslims against BJP govt

  • @rohit.thestructuralengineer
    @rohit.thestructuralengineer 2 роки тому +41

    Your points are correct about other DPSP but that doesn't reduces the need of UCC , The UCC is not only about the uniformity in laws but also about the removal of those religious laws or personal laws which are basis of discrimination , and the easiest one is the article 44 to apply so we should start with that and after that we will look forward for other after all you seems to believe that we should do things slowly and stepwise

  • @cyberfan1
    @cyberfan1 Рік тому

    Excellent episode. As always, AB has researched this thoroughly and presented the in a crisp and easy to understand manner.

  • @sbhatt2895
    @sbhatt2895 Рік тому +1

    Then bring ucc with a flexibility that people can choose. If people think that his religion law is unfair then he go with UCC during cases. Make UCC big boss and any party in the dispute choose UCC then other party must abide by it.

  • @saikatganguly221
    @saikatganguly221 2 роки тому +11

    India= Hindu VS Muslim
    Myanmar & Srilanka= Buddhist VS Muslim
    Israel = Jewish VS Muslim
    Chaina = Atheist VS Muslim
    Europe & America = Cristian VS Muslim
    middle East = Muslim VS Muslim
    Either the entire world is wrong or muslim 🤗🤭

    • @nirusingh5757
      @nirusingh5757 2 роки тому +5

      Aree isko kya samja rahe inke more than 50% viewers Muslims hai 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Best_Deals87
      @Best_Deals87 2 роки тому

      Entire World is Wrong Because Creator is Only One and No Other...👍🙄

    • @Best_Deals87
      @Best_Deals87 2 роки тому

      After End of WW3, There will be Only One Religion Remain i.e ISLAM...👍

    • @saikatganguly221
      @saikatganguly221 2 роки тому +3

      @@nirusingh5757 point to be noted My lord 🤣😂🤣

    • @saikatganguly221
      @saikatganguly221 2 роки тому +3

      @@Best_Deals87 R.I.P. Logic,😵🥴

  • @Mine_The_World
    @Mine_The_World 2 роки тому +69

    Sedition law is most dangerous than any other
    This law just need to stop
    I hope supreme Court never allowed them to implement that law

    • @ayushsaklani7235
      @ayushsaklani7235 2 роки тому +5

      UAPA also

    • @Mine_The_World
      @Mine_The_World 2 роки тому +5

      @@ayushsaklani7235 correct

    • @atisbasak
      @atisbasak 2 роки тому +3

      And also NSA.

    • @Mine_The_World
      @Mine_The_World 2 роки тому +4

      @AG i said any thing about ucc?
      I just saying that sedition law is dangerous
      I am also supporting ucc
      Now Just get lost

    • @SSingh-mr9yt
      @SSingh-mr9yt 2 роки тому

      Even if it is scrapped by SC…..govt will make a similar new law with different name..

  • @aryankohli1968
    @aryankohli1968 2 роки тому

    I have an assignment on uniform civil code vs the common civil code. And i have no Idea what to write. And confused af.

  • @nikhilranjan6830
    @nikhilranjan6830 2 роки тому +1

    i am law student so i want ucc it will gonna reduce our sallabus

  • @harsh8899
    @harsh8899 2 роки тому +14

    18:46 *Blatantly lying and misguiding* :(
    Any *educational book is best retained by reading and observing diagrams* and not by just listening it.

    • @factoshala1487
      @factoshala1487 2 роки тому +1

      Khud piche paper backs rakha h 😂😂

  • @rahularya4719
    @rahularya4719 2 роки тому +54

    NDTV articles for references 🤦🏻‍♂️ anyways UCC should be implemented the way designed by Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar 🙏

  • @rajaj3772
    @rajaj3772 2 роки тому +3

    Har badhiya chiz ko bina bat oppose krna, liberGandus ka dharm hai

  • @ysfmerchant
    @ysfmerchant Рік тому +1

    Akashji. Aapko sunne me aur dekhne me. Itna maza aata hai. Samuhne. Ki zarurat hi nahin.
    U R GREAT SIR ❤❤❤

  • @aneeshgidde5676
    @aneeshgidde5676 2 роки тому +12

    One of the best episode of The Deshbhakt....
    Thank you for making us aware about such important topics....

  • @umar-pioneersoverallllcsal2709
    @umar-pioneersoverallllcsal2709 2 роки тому +15

    After seeing this video I would like to see bhakt banerjee counter Mr. Asad owaisi

    • @paulavish5482
      @paulavish5482 2 роки тому +5

      He'll not counter. He'll smile and agree with him -- so that Owaisi is not offended. After the debate, Banerjee has to return to Bengal, right?

    • @hardikkumar1737
      @hardikkumar1737 2 роки тому

      That communal madrsachap person

  • @smartdahiya
    @smartdahiya 2 роки тому +1

    Kuchh pata to karo chunav hai kya? LEGEND MAN RAHAT INDORI SIR !

  • @jeet2965
    @jeet2965 2 роки тому +2

    Uniform civil code ana chaye 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @ars3955
    @ars3955 2 роки тому +11

    11:43 answer to your question is that
    When man keeps relationship with 2 or more women and women gives birth, father and mother of child is known…
    If women keeps relationship with 2 or more men then question comes is who is the father of child…
    Now answer this to me Deshbhakt

    • @neoizback
      @neoizback 2 роки тому +7

      he hasn't done his research on this, at most he will say, we have do a DNA test. But can everyone afford DNA test? Lol
      but what about the venereal diseases, when women has sex with more than one man, she is more susceptible to it...as a medical student i know for this a a fact. Lekin Bakhat toh andhay hotay hai chahay woh phir woh desh ke hi kyun na ho...lol

    • @ashutoshsharma2937
      @ashutoshsharma2937 2 роки тому +1

      @@neoizback court never give permission for DNA test
      It's good you are medical student but please read law also 👍

    • @neoizback
      @neoizback 2 роки тому

      @@ashutoshsharma2937 thank you!
      I was just saying hypothetically....for the test, if one wants to get a test with all the permissions and so on.

    • @Nothing-uc5mg
      @Nothing-uc5mg Рік тому

      @@neoizback what's the need to know who is the father? Are fathers going to feed them?They can simply earn money and divide it equally for their all childrens. The duty of men to protect and earn, the mother can do the baby care sitting at home simple.
      If 4 women can live under one roof and don't be jealous of each others child and don't be jealous of his husbands sex with another woman then men can also do the same.
      In polygamy - a woman can never know if her husband loves her more or the other wives, similary
      In polyandry - a man should not know if his wife loves his baby more or not. In fact it will bring more equality among those children coz no one knows who is whose child and jealousy will be not there. Even the mother herself won't know which child is of which husband so she can't be biased towards just one husbands child.

    • @throwingcrabs
      @throwingcrabs 11 місяців тому

      If the law cannot be the same for women then why does it exist in the first place? I mean if equality is impossible with this law then just remove that law so that no man can have more than 1 wife at the same time

  • @aritradas.m
    @aritradas.m 2 роки тому +39

    I support UCC . Everyone is equal so law should be equal. Overall it was Ambedkar sir's dream.

    • @ashraf.ali874
      @ashraf.ali874 2 роки тому +5

      Brother there are many other dreams of Ambedkar like no caste system, no reservations,no inequalities,no hunger deaths,no unemployment....etc.think about them also

    • @dadidkhn7405
      @dadidkhn7405 2 роки тому +2

      Pehle fursat me nikal

    • @mehnurevolution.899
      @mehnurevolution.899 2 роки тому +3

      @Trt l tnt and the same people support CAA 😂hypocrisy much?

    • @inamdarsaquib9528
      @inamdarsaquib9528 2 роки тому

      Mera liberal thought bhi support me hi hai, par in logon ka intention samajh nahi aaya,
      Pahele CAA lakar bolenge aise kaise equal hogaye tum log, phir ucc ki baat karenge.

    • @aarnavsingh
      @aarnavsingh 2 роки тому +3

      You have 57 countries we don't even have one country and you were the ones who said we will follow sharia during triple talaq but when something good happens to Hindus you all become secular what about Kashmiri pandits and liberandus,Indira made India a secular country we will again convert it into Hindu Rashtra

  • @drnadiyabhat3464
    @drnadiyabhat3464 2 роки тому +1

    No great improvements in the lot of mankind are possible untill a great change takes place in the fundamental Constitution of their modes of thought.( J S Mill)

  • @7proy
    @7proy Рік тому

    Uniform civil code is needed for a modern India.. Indian will never be ready...

  • @antiracistbaby1085
    @antiracistbaby1085 2 роки тому +57

    To borrow and to modify a quote from Game of thrones
    We have had vicious Prime Ministers
    We have had idiot prime minister
    But we have never been cursed with vicious idiot for a Prime Minister before

    • @blood_on_mountains
      @blood_on_mountains 2 роки тому +1

      Smart Indian

    • @SW46NH
      @SW46NH 2 роки тому +4

      Only in India can one digest that "Modi sold tea and today he's the PM. Its been constantly shoved in people's face as if that's the requirement to be a PM or some sort of achievement or miracle. The fact is "good guys never win races" also applies to Modi and he surely ain't one.
      Wouldn't that be credible to have educated people on those dignified positions?

    • @JustAPokemonCommentingOnVideos
      @JustAPokemonCommentingOnVideos 2 роки тому +3

      not to mention his best friend amit shah

    • @Anshul93798
      @Anshul93798 2 роки тому +3

      Do not call them idiot lol.

    • @Anshul93798
      @Anshul93798 2 роки тому +4

      Remember we support modi cuz we only have one choice regardless of what he does. Even Aravind Kejriwal sir will be better substitution but he lacks in other state plus there is even bad politicians in AAP party

  • @rishudwivedi739
    @rishudwivedi739 2 роки тому +38

    6:34 par agar state aur center ke law me contradiction hoga to center ka hi law rahega
    Mtlb center's domination over state

    • @thedeshbhakt
      @thedeshbhakt  2 роки тому +12

      yes

    • @debasismandal1228
      @debasismandal1228 2 роки тому +1

      @@thedeshbhakt big fan sir :)

    • @aagamjain1395
      @aagamjain1395 2 роки тому +2

      And what is wrong in that?
      India is a Cosi Federal country. Centre will always prevail over states

    • @rishudwivedi739
      @rishudwivedi739 2 роки тому +1

      @@aagamjain1395 tu kyu khafa ho raha h

    • @aagamjain1395
      @aagamjain1395 2 роки тому

      @@rishudwivedi739Repeating my question in Hindi doesn't mean answering my question 😒

  • @kgnhunter4603
    @kgnhunter4603 Рік тому +1

    DPSP ke article 47 ke aage ke part ko padna bhool gaye shaayad! Vahi Jo pine aur pilaaneke baare me hei. Vese duva bhi ata hei isme🧐🧐🧐

  • @mukulkumar6299
    @mukulkumar6299 2 роки тому +3

    Bhai dislike button kyun hide kr diya🤔

  • @harrehmatsingh
    @harrehmatsingh 2 роки тому +38

    UCC required for animals...
    Why discriminate between cows and other animals on slaughter ban?

    • @millennialmind9507
      @millennialmind9507 2 роки тому

      @HarRehmat Singh also for cats and dogs too 🤔

    • @harrehmatsingh
      @harrehmatsingh 2 роки тому +8

      @@millennialmind9507 for goats, tigers, lions, buffalows, pigs.... Why isn't indian crowd so possesive for their safety?

    • @MadaraUchiha-qq6op
      @MadaraUchiha-qq6op 2 роки тому +9

      ok we will ensure goat slaughter is also banned
      but it is u guys who will bark thats why

    • @harrehmatsingh
      @harrehmatsingh 2 роки тому

      @@MadaraUchiha-qq6op 😂

    • @ElonMusk-tb2yi
      @ElonMusk-tb2yi 2 роки тому +5

      The reason why Hindu Hates cow Slaughter is because Cow is the most sacred animal in Hinduism. In Olden times Indian Civilisation was dependent on Cows. And Here some peaceful people Slaughters and Eats cow

  • @krishsuvarna6635
    @krishsuvarna6635 2 роки тому +20

    We support UCC 🇮🇳🙏

  • @prabaldey200
    @prabaldey200 Рік тому +1

    The episode is very helpful for me. Thanks for the video.

  • @rohitfavourites6752
    @rohitfavourites6752 Рік тому +1

    Abe editor!! Uske baad jo hota hai ;;editor rocks🎉😮