Loved your conversation with the first caller! It helped me with a few questions I had on immediate and ultimate fulfillment of prophesy- thank you Dr. Brown for your digging into these passages.
Wouldn't deliberately handling snakes and drink poison be equivalent to the devil telling Jesus to throw Himself down from the high place because of Psalm 91:11-12's promise that angels will protect? Jesus replies, "It is also written, Do not put the Lord thy God to the test." Why put the Lord to the test by letting poisonous snakes bite you?
I don't see anything in Isaiah 7 that says Immanuel would be born in the time of Ahaz ... it seems to me that because Ahaz did not ask for a sign, that God then gives a different sign, not merely dealing with the issue of that day, but to the great issue, namely the People wearying God through their hard-heartedness and sin (and issue that all mankind has). So Isaiah prophesies the coming of a child who will be Immanuel who will not just deliver His people from the sword, but from sin, and then this is idea is built out throughout the rest of the book of Isaiah.
To the first caller, the expression "choose/know good and evil" can also mean to become a king, not just obtaining the age of reason, although it can mean that too. Perhaps both meanings were intended here, one with a view to the immediate fulfillment, and another with a view to the long-term fulfillment in Christ...
Sure you can have two fulfillments, the first one being directly in the immediate context, and the second being a greater long-term typological fulfillment in the larger context of Christ's salvific mission. I don't think it's necessary to oppose the concepts of partial/complete fulfillment and dual/typological fulfillment against one another. They are just two similar ways of expressing the same basic ideas.
@michael brown, please speak to Todd White, he is going crazy with his preaching. He is blaspheming the Lord. He needs to get off the pulpit immediately…. I gathered that you have preached for him at his church before..
That is wrong Dr. Brown Ezekiel 36 has nothing to do with jewish. That is the problem when people talk about history then you talking about Europeans that has nothing to do with prophecy
@@Failur3i5n0tan0pt1on it is because they rely on the Talmud to interpret scripture and the Talmud is the Europeans jewish rabbis philosophical survival tool opposite to biblical teachings also understanding. It will be so easy if they just follow the precepts and steadfast to the moral teachings of Christ instead of using secular books to just prove a Point debating dogma whilst missing the big picture or essence of what Christ was trying to accomplish
Loved your conversation with the first caller! It helped me with a few questions I had on immediate and ultimate fulfillment of prophesy- thank you Dr. Brown for your digging into these passages.
ASKDrBrown Line of Fire 🔥 Listening from Mass USA TYVM 💙 Mike
Thank you Dr Brown for your amazing talked. GOD in Father, Son/JESUS Christ and Holy Spirit bless you and yours. Greetings from Indonesia.
Wouldn't deliberately handling snakes and drink poison be equivalent to the devil telling Jesus to throw Himself down from the high place because of Psalm 91:11-12's promise that angels will protect? Jesus replies, "It is also written, Do not put the Lord thy God to the test." Why put the Lord to the test by letting poisonous snakes bite you?
I don't see anything in Isaiah 7 that says Immanuel would be born in the time of Ahaz ... it seems to me that because Ahaz did not ask for a sign, that God then gives a different sign, not merely dealing with the issue of that day, but to the great issue, namely the People wearying God through their hard-heartedness and sin (and issue that all mankind has). So Isaiah prophesies the coming of a child who will be Immanuel who will not just deliver His people from the sword, but from sin, and then this is idea is built out throughout the rest of the book of Isaiah.
To the first caller, the expression "choose/know good and evil" can also mean to become a king, not just obtaining the age of reason, although it can mean that too. Perhaps both meanings were intended here, one with a view to the immediate fulfillment, and another with a view to the long-term fulfillment in Christ...
Sure you can have two fulfillments, the first one being directly in the immediate context, and the second being a greater long-term typological fulfillment in the larger context of Christ's salvific mission. I don't think it's necessary to oppose the concepts of partial/complete fulfillment and dual/typological fulfillment against one another. They are just two similar ways of expressing the same basic ideas.
32min 40 sec....Mark ended at Mark 16:8..maybe 9...Out of the thousands of Manuscripts we have Mark ended at 16:8
@michael brown, please speak to Todd White, he is going crazy with his preaching. He is blaspheming the Lord. He needs to get off the pulpit immediately…. I gathered that you have preached for him at his church before..
That is wrong Dr. Brown Ezekiel 36 has nothing to do with jewish. That is the problem when people talk about history then you talking about Europeans that has nothing to do with prophecy
Jesus healed a little girl. Mohammed "married" one. (I can't use the real word here on UA-cam, unfortunately.)
@@billyhw99 I know her name
@@Failur3i5n0tan0pt1on it is because they rely on the Talmud to interpret scripture and the Talmud is the Europeans jewish rabbis philosophical survival tool opposite to biblical teachings also understanding.
It will be so easy if they just follow the precepts and steadfast to the moral teachings of Christ instead of using secular books to just prove a Point debating dogma whilst missing the big picture or essence of what Christ was trying to accomplish
@@mohamedsamura762 I wasn't talking about her name, but about what your namesake did to her.
@@billyhw99 that was a child abuse and irresponsible