Fourth Amendment: Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement (Part I)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 тра 2020
- Visit us at lawshelf.com to earn college credit for only $20 a credit! We now offer multi-packs, which allow you to purchase 5 exams for the price of 3, or 10 exams for the price of 5, and are thus the most efficient and affordable way to earn college credit with LawShelf courses. LawShelf courses have been evaluated and recommended for college credit by the National College Credit Recommendation Service (NCCRS), and may be transferred to over 1,500 colleges and universities. We also have established a growing list of partner colleges that guarantee LawShelf credit transfers, including Excelsior University, Thomas Edison State University, University of Maryland Global Campus, Purdue University Global, Touro University Worldwide, and many more!
Subscribe for weekly legal videos and visit us at lawshelf.com for more LawShelf resources! LawShelf is a project of National Paralegal College nationalparalegal.edu.
Thanks for this! -A procrastinating law student
Glad it was helpful!
Ditto
It's Awesome Georgia
Under the original public meaning of the Fourth Amendment, a portion of the common law 'implied license' concerning trespass was revoked, specifically, any implied license for a government official to enter upon the curtilage of a home for the purpose of seeking information about a violation of law.
This has yet to be properly recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Do you have any sources for this? Such as letters from the founders?
I don't have any tickets.
Good vid
Take all the Exceptions under the 4th and compile them together in a list, they should equal out to somekind of General Warrant.
Warrant are supposed specific not general. “and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” -4th amendment
Border guards and TSA agents do not require warrants either to perform searches
False
So if someone were to get arrested for a traffic warrant and the LEO searches the car ? Can evidence bring new charges?
As long as the search is legal (and a search incident to a lawful arrest is), the evidence found is admissible and can lead to new charges.
These statements are true ... under Statutory Jurisdiction.
The 4th amendment doesnt say anything about exceptions or community care taker
Next thing you're gonna have exceptions for everything else.
I believe that if there had been some kind of exception it would have been found in the Constitution, in which case it isn't!
You really commented several times on the same video😂
the warrant requirement isn't in the constitution either. the 4th just says warrants have to be based on PC it never says warrants are required.
I'm asking you once, i'm gon ask again, look do you mind if i search? moments later.... You have any question for us? ANYTHING ELSE? No question following our question.
Well what you didn't you didn't mention this is that cops will lie to you and that's not illegal but if you lied to them that's withholding information. If police approach you without warrant in hand, they're building a case more often than not and want to gather evidence to get the warrant. DON'T TALK TO POLICE, my defense attorney and even other cops say if you're at home don't answer the door and ignore them... Always record your interactions with them because they will twist contextual situations to their favor. They have told me in the past for refusing to let them search that they can use my refusal as grounds to then search whatever it was anyway which isn't the case.... Doesn't mean they won't lie and say I smelled the odor of marijuana or something like that, which it's best to not answer them in the first place. If they have the evidence they won't be asking permission.
👍
Only an idiot would allow a violation of the right!
Exceptions are plain and simple and that is violations of the rights.