The fact is, Aurangzeb is a TRUE Muslim who did everything that Islam and Muhammad teach Muslims to do in a Dar al-Harb (Land of War). So of course he will be their hero. But you can't admit that out loud in a multi-religious country like India, especially where you are a minority, and still not cause any conflict. Had they been the majority, then he would have been crowned as their national hero and planes and missiles been named after him, like in Pakistan.
Exactly. And NONE OF THE ABRAHAMIC religions are native to this land. They shouldn't even be here in the first place. Hence when they start about Hindus not being secular today, it's hilarious.
@@nitinchauhan1909 it's not true, they never ruled entire country, also many kings faught with them constantly many times they won and ruled india Complete history is never taught to us, dear friend
@@arunnshinh4470yes. One Muslim with me on debate never ready to agree to me that aurangzeb was cruel. I stopped debating him. I know if supreme court also tells aurangzeb was cruel they will not ready to take it. Let them live in their own fantasy world
When I first start taking interest in Indian History: It seems to me that Indian civilization is only 1000 years old and full of Invaders with Vijay Nagar and Chola Empre mentioned as footnote..no mention of Ahom Dynasty at all... Modern History of India specially pre-independence history feels more like eulogy for Gandhi which frankly is a huge disservice to most of the freedom movement... While post independence Indian History is all about Nehruvian Era...I still remember reading 'Nehru working in Office for 18 hours straight' And Left still called this crap well researched piece...
Question of Century : Aurangzeb k saza aaj k muslim ko nahi deni chahiye & auranzeb bohot secular admi tha, To batao muslim ko usko manana chahiye ya nahi ?
In the guise of glorifying Tipu Sultan, a sitting MLA from MH state coalition govt named local playground after the Mughal Ruler..all for sake votebank politics!! The same MLA is the artist in land grabbing all over the outskirts of metro city - a feat & part time career activity of the community which is indigenously famous for..
The overview effect is a cognitive shift reported by some astronauts while viewing the Earth from space. Researchers have described the effect as “a state of awe with self-transcendent qualities, precipitated by a particularly striking visual stimulus.” The most prominent common aspects of personally experiencing the Earth from space are appreciation and perception of beauty, unexpected and even overwhelming emotion, and a heightened sense of connection to other people and the Earth as a whole. Michael Collins, a crew member on the Apollo 11 spacecraft (1969), said that “the thing that really surprised me was that it [Earth] projected an air of fragility. And why, I don’t know. I don’t know to this day. I had a feeling it’s tiny, it’s shiny, it’s beautiful, it’s home, and it’s fragile.” Edgar Mitchell, who was aboard the Apollo 14 (1971), recalled, “You develop an instant global consciousness, a people orientation, an intense dissatisfaction with the state of the world, and a compulsion to do something about it. From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a ...’” A student of mine asked me about the overview effect and suggested that space tourism might make people feel more connected to the Earth and to each other. I can see why a trip to outer space and a view of the world from there would make one aware of the fragility of our (not so big) blue marble, and how we are all dependent on each other. From out there, it is easy to see that we are all breathing the same air, feeding on the same soil, and drinking the same water. Still, I do not believe space travel would change much about the way we treat our planet because the people at the helm, those who call the shots, could not care less. In April, António Guterres, the United Nations Secretary General, stated his opinion about such people in the most undiplomatic terms: “Some governments and business leaders are saying one thing but doing another. Simply put, they are lying.” When you read this, you feel like taking politicians out to space, making them look down on Earth, as Edgar Mitchell suggested, and leaving them there to float until they change. But seriously, I do not think they will change, or even that they can. Politicians care about one thing only: control. They cannot see or feel anything else. As long as they are alive, they want to be on top, and nothing else matters to them. What can we do about it? I am not really sure. However, if enough people change their perception of life and realize that solidarity and mutual concern are more important than pride and power, perhaps politicians will change their views, as well. I do not think that they will change from within, but they just might realize that in order to stay at the helm, they must endorse such values as concern for others and compassion rather than vanity and self-absorption. In conclusion, we need a thorough educational process so we become not only human beings, but humane beings.
Nor is there need to black paint Aurangzeb or Tipu Sultan. I am sure people of Kalinga also would have hated Asoka for centuries. A King cannot be non-controversial. There will be enemies. You will have to take a balanced view.
Khurubhai seems much closer to Gazni Ghouri snd Iranian Looter Nader Shah than Gandhis snd Nehrus anyday. Their main chagrin is hindus have started to speak out with less fear. By the way muslims snd Catholics did not spare Dalits too. Ye jay bhim jay mim sub ullu banaane ka dhandha. Islam has bern happiest in India than any other place.
Don't be wrong of Hinduism or stuff that as best both are dangerous. I honestly know that Hinduism means anything... . Atheism to monotheism to polytheism to anyone becoming God too... It was "region" . But as of now, I have to *not be a Hindu" because I am thought that I am following "a foreign religion another God, whereas I believe God is only one for the whole world. But, let me just stick to that condemnation of you. Like even inside Christianity they labelled Christians as" prostestants" by worst.. If Martin Luther won in the argument , the other sect would have been criminals "protesting ...." .. They took that as theirs... And in that horrible hatred we have to tolerate people tell Jesus as illegitimate... For me, Religion means terrorists... We don't "save God" like vivekanada said....with a heavy heart.. Read his auto biography... ...
Kurshid seems upset by such arguments. That expression
True lol , but I think it just his normal face
By heart khuru is closer to gazni ghouri esp iranian Nader Shah than Gandhi, Nehru any day.
Facts are facts, say them as they are, Kudos to Dr Sampath👍
The fact is, Aurangzeb is a TRUE Muslim who did everything that Islam and Muhammad teach Muslims to do in a Dar al-Harb (Land of War). So of course he will be their hero. But you can't admit that out loud in a multi-religious country like India, especially where you are a minority, and still not cause any conflict. Had they been the majority, then he would have been crowned as their national hero and planes and missiles been named after him, like in Pakistan.
Spot on 🔥
You are absolutely right 👍
OMG what a point , Spot On Mr Vikram Sampath.
An Abrahamic person can NEVER be secular! .
Really well said
Exactly. And NONE OF THE ABRAHAMIC religions are native to this land. They shouldn't even be here in the first place. Hence when they start about Hindus not being secular today, it's hilarious.
Iraq was converted
Iran was converted
Gandhar was converted as Afghanistan...
But India became SECULAR by the same people or their ancestors !😅
Wrong
India is changing under the leadership of PM Modi Ji, This is for sure...
Dr. Sampath👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Vikram sampath is a champ
Khurshid be like : Why am even here bc 🤦♂️
Very well said Dr Sampath 👌
Can we have a full debate on this topic please ? I want to listen on the defender's points as well
Very well explained!
When these muslim claim they ruled us, then you take responsibility for atrocities and music now
Insha allah 800 saalo tak hukumat ki hai 😎😎
@@nitinchauhan1909 it's not true, they never ruled entire country, also many kings faught with them constantly many times they won and ruled india
Complete history is never taught to us, dear friend
@@arunnshinh4470 ye sab madarsa/commies/libbus ko kaise samjhaoge bhai ?
@@nitinchauhan1909 ignore karo, samjanaa hi kyon hai!!
@@arunnshinh4470yes. One Muslim with me on debate never ready to agree to me that aurangzeb was cruel. I stopped debating him. I know if supreme court also tells aurangzeb was cruel they will not ready to take it. Let them live in their own fantasy world
When I first start taking interest in Indian History:
It seems to me that Indian civilization is only 1000 years old and full of Invaders with Vijay Nagar and Chola Empre mentioned as footnote..no mention of Ahom Dynasty at all...
Modern History of India specially pre-independence history feels more like eulogy for Gandhi which frankly is a huge disservice to most of the freedom movement...
While post independence Indian History is all about Nehruvian Era...I still remember reading 'Nehru working in Office for 18 hours straight' And Left still called this crap well researched piece...
Jai Yogi 🚩 Jai Modi 🚩 Jai BJP 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 Jai Hind 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Good point.
Question of Century : Aurangzeb k saza aaj k muslim ko nahi deni chahiye & auranzeb bohot secular admi tha, To batao muslim ko usko manana chahiye ya nahi ?
Good points.
Tarek Fatah has been saying this for decades now
In the guise of glorifying Tipu Sultan, a sitting MLA from MH state coalition govt named local playground after the Mughal Ruler..all for sake votebank politics!! The same MLA is the artist in land grabbing all over the outskirts of metro city - a feat & part time career activity of the community which is indigenously famous for..
It's correct say what it is as it is
The overview effect is a cognitive shift reported by some astronauts while viewing the Earth from space. Researchers have described the effect as “a state of awe with self-transcendent qualities, precipitated by a particularly striking visual stimulus.” The most prominent common aspects of personally experiencing the Earth from space are appreciation and perception of beauty, unexpected and even overwhelming emotion, and a heightened sense of connection to other people and the Earth as a whole.
Michael Collins, a crew member on the Apollo 11 spacecraft (1969), said that “the thing that really surprised me was that it [Earth] projected an air of fragility. And why, I don’t know. I don’t know to this day. I had a feeling it’s tiny, it’s shiny, it’s beautiful, it’s home, and it’s fragile.” Edgar Mitchell, who was aboard the Apollo 14 (1971), recalled, “You develop an instant global consciousness, a people orientation, an intense dissatisfaction with the state of the world, and a compulsion to do something about it. From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a ...’”
A student of mine asked me about the overview effect and suggested that space tourism might make people feel more connected to the Earth and to each other.
I can see why a trip to outer space and a view of the world from there would make one aware of the fragility of our (not so big) blue marble, and how we are all dependent on each other. From out there, it is easy to see that we are all breathing the same air, feeding on the same soil, and drinking the same water.
Still, I do not believe space travel would change much about the way we treat our planet because the people at the helm, those who call the shots, could not care less. In April, António Guterres, the United Nations Secretary General, stated his opinion about such people in the most undiplomatic terms: “Some governments and business leaders are saying one thing but doing another. Simply put, they are lying.”
When you read this, you feel like taking politicians out to space, making them look down on Earth, as Edgar Mitchell suggested, and leaving them there to float until they change. But seriously, I do not think they will change, or even that they can.
Politicians care about one thing only: control. They cannot see or feel anything else. As long as they are alive, they want to be on top, and nothing else matters to them.
What can we do about it? I am not really sure. However, if enough people change their perception of life and realize that solidarity and mutual concern are more important than pride and power, perhaps politicians will change their views, as well. I do not think that they will change from within, but they just might realize that in order to stay at the helm, they must endorse such values as concern for others and compassion rather than vanity and self-absorption. In conclusion, we need a thorough educational process so we become not only human beings, but humane beings.
Full video link
Had Aurangzeb been a secular Muslim Indian Muslims don't consider them as their hero.The fact is if you know you know.
Shame on us. 12k views in 13days. Are we Delhiwalas
And why to make Hero’s out of such people??? That our History books!!
I dont feel uncomfortable about moghuls ruling India.
Nor is there need to black paint Aurangzeb or Tipu Sultan. I am sure people of Kalinga also would have hated Asoka for centuries. A King cannot be non-controversial. There will be enemies. You will have to take a balanced view.
Khurubhai seems much closer to Gazni Ghouri snd Iranian Looter Nader Shah than Gandhis snd Nehrus anyday. Their main chagrin is hindus have started to speak out with less fear. By the way muslims snd Catholics did not spare Dalits too. Ye jay bhim jay mim sub ullu banaane ka dhandha. Islam has bern happiest in India than any other place.
Don't be wrong of Hinduism or stuff that as best both are dangerous. I honestly know that Hinduism means anything... . Atheism to monotheism to polytheism to anyone becoming God too... It was "region" . But as of now, I have to *not be a Hindu" because I am thought that I am following "a foreign religion another God, whereas I believe God is only one for the whole world.
But, let me just stick to that condemnation of you. Like even inside Christianity they labelled Christians as" prostestants" by worst.. If Martin Luther won in the argument , the other sect would have been criminals "protesting ...." .. They took that as theirs...
And in that horrible hatred we have to tolerate people tell Jesus as illegitimate... For me, Religion means terrorists...
We don't "save God" like vivekanada said....with a heavy heart.. Read his auto biography... ...
Hinduism as a religion is dangerous but as a culture it's never and will never be one.. people still follow it as a culture instead of religion.
Sixer
Sala North India ki kyu nhi jante hai hamari assam history
AURANGZEB zindabad
Aurangzeb aur TMKB!
Zindabad?? magar wo to kab ka mar gya
😂hn he maa ko side m. Le kr gaya rha aurangjeb fr ye mullha bn gaya and hence ye aurangjeb ki najaj aulad 😂aaj usko pooj rha h