I just love learning from you. Hearing how much you do NOT care about the things I spent years in the past worrying about, does my heart good. Thank you for being YOU.
I used to teach photography crash courses about 8 years ago. It was a quick, 1-hour lesson and then another hour shooting landmarks around downtown in the city. It was with a company and they had three levels of expertise people could sign up to. I quickly realized it was just easier to learn manual mode than trying to go around the camera's "thinking" with the semi-auto modes and all of their implied variables.
Plus, using manual mode lets the photographer think! Supposed an intelligent person is using the camera, the thinking will improve (and thus the amount of - instantly - correctly exposed images), which a camera can not.
There is one reason why the metering mode is important even in manual mode. The camera uses the meterung mode in manual also, this means if you set your exposure by the build in camera meter it shows you what it reads. Different modes mean your exposure is different even in manual. If you dont care about the mode you have to go by your eyes only which means you could get it wrong
Back in the days of film, I used to use a handheld incident light meter. I was more interested in light ratios and the light falling on the subject instead of the light reflecting off various tones. Example: A groom in a black suit with a bride in a super white wedding dress measures the same exposure in incident light if the light is of the same intensity on both the groom and the bride. A through the lens meter, being a reflective meter will read the light reflecting from the black and from the white and give different readings.
I love how your videos bring forth so my clarity on topics I've pondered about for so long, but never heard a precise, educated explanation till I see it on this channel. Thank you for your time in putting this education out there.
The in-camera reflected metering recommendation varies with the size of the subject relative to the meter pattern, background and subject tonality, and built in algorithms. You need only shift the camera, keeping the subject in the same position within the frame, from horizontal to vertical when using Evaluative/Matrix metering to see the metered. recommendation change. More often than not the exposure recommended will need to be altered to suit your vision of the scene: how you want the main subject to be rendered in tone relative to the background environment. I use spot metering a known tone making adjustments accordingly. Spot Metering Mode does one thing renders all tones it reads to an 18% grey accurately and without fail each and every time. So this is my preferred metering mode. I can make quick on the spot changes to the recommended setting. I know from experience that a total white tone will need three stops over the recommended reading to get a perfect tone. White with detail plus two to two and half stops, light grey plus one stop and midtone no adjustment. Dark grey minus one stop, black with detail minus two to two and half stops and total black tone minus three stops, then checking RGB histogram to see where the tonal ranges fall. And further compensate if needed.If the scene contrast is greater than that of the range of your medium (typically 5 stops) then the whites will lack detail, and the darker areas will block up unless you compensate accordingly. The closing down of one f/stop for whites, and the opening up of the same for blacks is simply a matter of salting and peppering to taste. For more detail in the blacks, open up; for more in the whites close down, no secrets here. You can use a digital camera’s RGB histogram to check exposures after the fact, and, while in-camera, histograms are convenient and, yes, powerful tools, they can be confusing to interpret, as can “eyeballing” image brightness on the tiny LCD preview screen found on the back of your camera. An in-camera histogram represents the overall tonal values present in the scene. It does not tell us if the most important element is properly exposed. You could easily be off your ideal exposure and not know that from the in-camera histogram. Isolating the element/subject/area of most importance via a selection in PhotoShop and viewing the histogram is more beneficial in ascertaining critical exposure as it relates to the overall image.
Gray pavement is a good neutral, ground in general, and then you dial it down from there. That's how i learned it with film in the80ies. It would have worked in the shown shoot too to pick up exposure from the foreground (if one happens to be on an old camera with larger center metering). Concentrate less on exposure/technique and more on seeing things. Feel fast and shoot fast. "Focus" is all you need. Embrace imperfections like blown out hair as well as blur. Both work tremendously well when the shot itself works...
As usual Karl, right on. I can't believe how many people these days think manual is hard to do. They should try the old, chrome, days with Polaroid backs, flash meters, spot meters, and all the mental averaging calculations....... It's so easy to just look and adjust.
I just keep it at spot all the time. But most of the time I don't even use it. Since I use a mirrorless camera, I look through the evf to check if that's good to my eye or not. And I also look at the histogram to make sure that the highlights aren't blown out. I only look at the metering bar when lighting condition is complicated to make sure that the highlights and the shadows are still within the dynamic range that my camera can capture.
Manual all the way for me. never bother with anything else.....I remember the info on the inside of boxes for rolls of film...a copy of "The Amateur Photographer Handbook" was your only man in those days....great video as always.
As soon as the video started, something told me that you didn't pay much attention to metering modes, I don't know why but I knew. Excellent as always.
I'm currently in art school for digital photography. I started last year when the pandemic first started. I wanted that hands on experience, but sadly campus was closed do to covid. So everything has been online. Its hard for me to get a good grasp when I am just reading the books and powerpoint slides. These videos have helped me tremendously. I really enjoy them and I've learned a lot. Thank you!
I use my camera in manual mode. I don’t use the other modes. I do use exposure compensation because I shoot ice hockey and many sunny days in winter. The camera will want to close down the aperture. This gives me an under exposed image, muddy colours and no detail in skin tones when players are on the ice due to the reflective surface. So Exposure EV is set to +1,7 or +1.3 depending on the arena. I usually check settings and surroundings before games. Snow scenes are the same. A lot of reflection from snow. Even when overcast the camera can give me a false reading due to the snow and make the scene flat or the snow almost gray. So I use EV when needed
When using manual mode, you have to consider the luminance value of the metered surface: when metering snow in cloudy light, you have to let the meter go to +2 EV in stead of 0 using aperture or shutter speed setting. That will directly give you the white snow instead of the grey one. Using the EV correction gives the same effect when at +2, but the possibility exist that you will forget to re-adjust it and the following photo's will be overexposed. You can easily train yourself to interpret multiple surfaces to luminance values and it lasts a lifetime.
All my Canon DSLR's live in evaluative metering mode. I just eyeball the scene and set exposure base on what I want from that in manual. So generally I also don't care about the metering mode.
All metering patterns and methods work, some are simply easier to implement than others in certain circumstances. In truth, I will use whatever method I think is easier in a given situation. I believe to truly be a consistent photographer you need to understand the benefits and detriments of each pattern and method. Knowing how the pattern or reference value determines the recommended exposure, be it Eval/Matrix, Spot, Incident, or Reference Values is paramount to this understanding.
I've been photographing with cameras that didn't have a built-in meter, but the negatives were processed by a professional photographer who used a self-levelling developer. That was in the seventies when I was nearly a teenager. Over the years I've learned to work with all these systems and when "photographing" there is no other mode but manual for me. The amount of control is impeccable that way. When the kids - and grandchildren - are doing lovely things in the garden, I prefer matrix metering. On every camera (Canon, Olympus or Nikon) this gives the best results globally. Depending on the subject and the background, I use exposure correction. For fast and candid photography the matrix metering is best, but it happens - mostly on Canon - that I prefer centre-weighted metering. What works best though, is checking the histogram, even when doing action photography (kids, animals, sports). In such situations the surrounding lighting condition is known and in that case even manual mode (sports indoor i.e.) works very well. I used some test shots (in manual mode, that is) before the play and evaluated the histogram and the possible - usable - shutter speed. I set the aperture and ISO to values that worked to get the preferred shutter speed and kept those values throughout the event. The results were better than I expected, actually.
Yes negatives and the C41 processing was very forgiving you could extract more than a stop either way, unlike E6 slide film where the exposures needed to be at least a quarter of a stop on target. When I worked in darkrooms we used to sometimes 'clip test' slide film by processing one frame or sheet as a test, evaluating the exposure and then adjust the processing time and temperature to get more or less exposure out of the film. This was called 'Push' or 'Pull' processing and could often rescue an incorrectly exposed slide/transparency film.
@@VisualEducationStudio In case I used Kodachrome or Ektachrome, my Sekonic L-398A did good work. Since films like these were calibrated to match a calibrated ASA-value, the external meter was useful there (although the spot meter in the Olympus OM-2 Spot Program did an excellent job *), but since digital cameras interpret ISO-values quite different, the only true way for me is the histogram. *) this reminds me that I trained myself to interpret different surfaces to the meter values: Caucasian skin would be 2/3 step higher; grass was mostly 1/3 lower as well as dry tarmac, etc... a leftover from my early experiments with black-and-white film where I translated the colours in my head to greyscales or luminance values. That still comes in handy! Of course, using the Sphere on the Sekonic excluded this "trick" because no reflective colours were involved.
When I trained in 1990 we learnt sensitometry and the zone system, basically how to measure the tonal range of a scene and increase/decrease exposure and development to produce a printable negative, with today's mirrorless cameras the ability to see the histogram makes things so much easier, that and learning to 'read' a scene i.e. does shadow or highlight detail takes presidence makes camera metering choice less of an issue.
Ahh yes the zone system and also using it in the darkroom for printing, those were the days. I do miss a lot of the facets of the analogue way of doing things and am grateful that I cut my teeth back in that day.
I have one example when auto mode could be very helpfull. For example if I'm using camera with digital viewfinder and shooting in very sunny day then screen of my camera will be very dark (compared to daylight) and bad colors. So I just can't rely on my artistic view of correct exposure. In this case I could take big bright monitor with my camera (or some other helping things) or just finger crossed and rely on auto metering. Also auto is good if you should hold hour camera in strange position like very close to the ground or very high and you just can't see what is going on in viewfinder. In this case it's ok, better then trying to find stairs somewhere in the mountains for example. And RAW have enough stored data to correct mistake of +- 1 EV without big problems.
Yes you can use exposure compensation and find out which metering mode to use and waste half an hour or just use the spot meter and check on screen and see if it's ok...
Got a manual lens on a camera that doesn't support metering with it. I planned to set it manualy and then adjust based on the readings frm screen and histogram. To my surprise the adjustment was needed only the first couple times. Then the exposure turned out to be just what I expected from looking on the seen. So I don't care if there is a meeter at all.
Karl, you put a smile on my face, cause I don't either, I think it is spot hehehehe. Always shoot manual, look at the picture in view finder, look at the histogram and most of the time, just by gut feeling ! Thanks for sharing !
Ironically, I feel easier to work on manual mode and just check the histogram than relying on decisions taken by the camera. I am still struggling to understand semi automatic modes.
“A” or aperture priority let’s you pick the aperture and iso, the camera uses its metering to choose a shutter speed. “S” or shutter priority let’s you choose the shutter speed and iso and the cameras metering will choose an aperture to properly expose. Depending on the shot you need you choose one over the other (such as bokeh or needing a high shutter speed for action)
Thanks Mr Karl Taylor for posting. I use Matrix metering because I want to go down the rabbit hole and explore how to expose for different situations in manual mode and unplug myself from all these jargons that make gear holic reviewers switch camera systems and cause others to follow them like blind Lemmings. In other words, excellent video.👍👍👍
Hi, pls what do you mean by your subject in center of the frame for center weighted average mode. What is the frame? How can I understand my frame in the view finder? Do you have a video for it? Pls i might sounds stupid, i just need to get this once and for all. Thank you.
Back in the day, Sony Handycams boasted of being able to expose for the highlights and shadows automatically at the same time. Sounds like HDR right? What happened to that technology? I think newer, more advanced mirrorless can do that for photos, or can't they?
I lot of the newer cameras can generate a HDR JPEG, and a few of the newest are even able to do HDR RAW. Depending on what I'm trying to convey, though, sometimes I'll want the shadows to go to 0 or the highlights to 255. As an old Zone System photographer, I usually begin an exposure by deciding where I want the mid-tones to fall. I prefer to make further adjustments--dodging and burning, as it used to be called--in post for final image refinement or to adjust the image for whichever paper I'm printing on.
Nevermind. I looked at your website and got the answer. “It’s only really when you’re working in automatic or semi-automatic modes that metering really comes in handy.”
Before i finally bought a pro DSLR i thought that photography is a piece of cake (easy)... But after I got my 5D Mark III, and watching many tutorials, tips, etc... I am overwhelmed a little bit 😟
Metering modes made easy in lucidity. I have a question: With everything set in a lighting situation how does the camera mechanism work when exposer compensation is set to a higher or lower value? Does this make the shutter speed or aperture or ISO adjustment (s) automatically or otherwise and if so how does the camera hold the same preselected exposure set given to the lighting situation?
A good question. It depends on the mode you are in, so if in AV then it will adjust ISO or shutter speed. If in TV then it will adjust ISO or aperture. If in full manual the Sony adjusts the ISO, on Canon I don't know because I adjust it all manually without bothering with the exp comp.
Great video! I started learning more about metering modes and in theory it makes sense but a bit frustrating in practice - for example my 70D is supposed to measure light in spot metering mode based on where the focus point is but when I try it seems like it is only measuring from the small spot in the centre of the screen that cannot be moved ? (same for partial ). Have I understood this wrong?
Sir I have a small doubt.. please... If I go to multiple flashes with trigger.. if I do not use 15 to 20 minutes flashes in the shooting.. again if I triggered is it fire or go to off mode.. is their any option too sir...
Hi @Karl Taylor : I have a doubt, which I have asked many, but not got an answer at all. Why don't camera makers introduce a bracketing with Spot, Centre weighted, average and evaluative metering. Is it not good to have such bracketing in complex situations where photographer do not have time to experiment or might miss the shot due to wrong selection of metering.
I usually shoot landscape images using fixed aperture at a fixed iso. Having switched to mirrorless I now adjust exposure by monitoring the histogram as I change the shutter speed. I can do this totally manually but often find it quicker to choose aperture priority with evaluative or spot metering to get me close and use exposure compensation for final correction.
Aperture priority is useful when the illumination varies a lot (clouds hovering on a windy day), but for widefield landscapes that is seldom useful because the shadows of these clouds are only partially covering the landscape.
I think metering mode will be way better in the future, for example take the face priority setting for the sony alpha, it is getting way better by the day and ai solution will come for the next generations where you can just input your object - meaning your style of photography - and the ai will quickly understand the way you want to shoot and will give you the correct exposure
This has happened to me, sometimes the ambient conditions shooting in bright light mean the screen doesn't stand out as much as you would like, just like looking at a phone in the sun. In the menu settings of most cameras though there is a brightness adjust for the screen only which helps but you need to remember to put it back when indoors or it will look wrong the other way too. I also usually have a black cloth in my bag to throw over my head to look at the camera.
Product photography on white background. White on white, gray on white, black on white... Here, the best choice is spot, right? The aim is to fiddle as less as possible in raw dev, object correctly metered and background white
Karl is a World Class teacher of photography. I'm always wanting to improve my skills. I think I'm going to join a monthly subscription as he's made it very affordable. ❤️
I just love learning from you. Hearing how much you do NOT care about the things I spent years in the past worrying about, does my heart good. Thank you for being YOU.
I used to teach photography crash courses about 8 years ago. It was a quick, 1-hour lesson and then another hour shooting landmarks around downtown in the city. It was with a company and they had three levels of expertise people could sign up to.
I quickly realized it was just easier to learn manual mode than trying to go around the camera's "thinking" with the semi-auto modes and all of their implied variables.
I'm with you on that
Plus, using manual mode lets the photographer think! Supposed an intelligent person is using the camera, the thinking will improve (and thus the amount of - instantly - correctly exposed images), which a camera can not.
O yeah - I actually find it MUCH harder to shoot in ANY of the semi automatic modes - Manual all the way :)
Karl Taylor is by far one of the best photography teachers. Thanks Karl!
There is one reason why the metering mode is important even in manual mode. The camera uses the meterung mode in manual also, this means if you set your exposure by the build in camera meter it shows you what it reads. Different modes mean your exposure is different even in manual. If you dont care about the mode you have to go by your eyes only which means you could get it wrong
The metering mode can also get it wrong. It's wrong if it isn't the exposure you want or anywhere close.
Back in the days of film, I used to use a handheld incident light meter. I was more interested in light ratios and the light falling on the subject instead of the light reflecting off various tones. Example: A groom in a black suit with a bride in a super white wedding dress measures the same exposure in incident light if the light is of the same intensity on both the groom and the bride. A through the lens meter, being a reflective meter will read the light reflecting from the black and from the white and give different readings.
I love how your videos bring forth so my clarity on topics I've pondered about for so long, but never heard a precise, educated explanation till I see it on this channel. Thank you for your time in putting this education out there.
You are welcome!
The in-camera reflected metering recommendation varies with the size of the subject relative to the meter pattern, background and subject tonality, and built in algorithms. You need only shift the camera, keeping the subject in the same position within the frame, from horizontal to vertical when using Evaluative/Matrix metering to see the metered. recommendation change. More often than not the exposure recommended will need to be altered to suit your vision of the scene: how you want the main subject to be rendered in tone relative to the background environment.
I use spot metering a known tone making adjustments accordingly. Spot Metering Mode does one thing renders all tones it reads to an 18% grey accurately and without fail each and every time. So this is my preferred metering mode. I can make quick on the spot changes to the recommended setting. I know from experience that a total white tone will need three stops over the recommended reading to get a perfect tone.
White with detail plus two to two and half stops, light grey plus one stop and midtone no adjustment. Dark grey minus one stop, black with detail minus two to two and half stops and total black tone minus three stops, then checking RGB histogram to see where the tonal ranges fall. And further compensate if needed.If the scene contrast is greater than that of the range of your medium (typically 5 stops) then the whites will lack detail, and the darker areas will block up unless you compensate accordingly. The closing down of one f/stop for whites, and the opening up of the same for blacks is simply a matter of salting and peppering to taste. For more detail in the blacks, open up; for more in the whites close down, no secrets here.
You can use a digital camera’s RGB histogram to check exposures after the fact, and, while in-camera, histograms are convenient and, yes, powerful tools, they can be confusing to interpret, as can “eyeballing” image brightness on the tiny LCD preview screen found on the back of your camera. An in-camera histogram represents the overall tonal values present in the scene. It does not tell us if the most important element is properly exposed. You could easily be off your ideal exposure and not know that from the in-camera histogram. Isolating the element/subject/area of most importance via a selection in PhotoShop and viewing the histogram is more beneficial in ascertaining critical exposure as it relates to the overall image.
Gray pavement is a good neutral, ground in general, and then you dial it down from there. That's how i learned it with film in the80ies. It would have worked in the shown shoot too to pick up exposure from the foreground (if one happens to be on an old camera with larger center metering).
Concentrate less on exposure/technique and more on seeing things. Feel fast and shoot fast. "Focus" is all you need. Embrace imperfections like blown out hair as well as blur. Both work tremendously well when the shot itself works...
As usual Karl, right on. I can't believe how many people these days think manual is hard to do. They should try the old, chrome, days with Polaroid backs, flash meters, spot meters, and all the mental averaging calculations....... It's so easy to just look and adjust.
Yes those were the days!
You're one of the best photographers channels ever ❤
Wow, thank you!
I just keep it at spot all the time. But most of the time I don't even use it. Since I use a mirrorless camera, I look through the evf to check if that's good to my eye or not. And I also look at the histogram to make sure that the highlights aren't blown out. I only look at the metering bar when lighting condition is complicated to make sure that the highlights and the shadows are still within the dynamic range that my camera can capture.
Manual all the way for me. never bother with anything else.....I remember the info on the inside of boxes for rolls of film...a copy of "The Amateur Photographer Handbook" was your only man in those days....great video as always.
Thirteen seconds in and I'm hooked already. Go ahead, bust another myth. I've been abusing photo myths for 35 years.
🤣😂🤣
I love your no bs approach to photography!
I appreciate that!
Crystal clear. As usual. The best pedagogue in photography.
Thanks!
As soon as the video started, something told me that you didn't pay much attention to metering modes, I don't know why but I knew. Excellent as always.
Cheers.
I'm currently in art school for digital photography. I started last year when the pandemic first started. I wanted that hands on experience, but sadly campus was closed do to covid. So everything has been online. Its hard for me to get a good grasp when I am just reading the books and powerpoint slides. These videos have helped me tremendously. I really enjoy them and I've learned a lot. Thank you!
Thank you
Love for the initial statement
You're so kind to offer this course. I shoot in Manual 90 percent of the time. Always so much to learn. You're amazing
I use my camera in manual mode. I don’t use the other modes. I do use exposure compensation because I shoot ice hockey and many sunny days in winter. The camera will want to close down the aperture. This gives me an under exposed image, muddy colours and no detail in skin tones when players are on the ice due to the reflective surface. So Exposure EV is set to +1,7 or +1.3 depending on the arena. I usually check settings and surroundings before games.
Snow scenes are the same. A lot of reflection from snow. Even when overcast the camera can give me a false reading due to the snow and make the scene flat or the snow almost gray. So I use EV when needed
When using manual mode, you have to consider the luminance value of the metered surface: when metering snow in cloudy light, you have to let the meter go to +2 EV in stead of 0 using aperture or shutter speed setting. That will directly give you the white snow instead of the grey one. Using the EV correction gives the same effect when at +2, but the possibility exist that you will forget to re-adjust it and the following photo's will be overexposed. You can easily train yourself to interpret multiple surfaces to luminance values and it lasts a lifetime.
All my Canon DSLR's live in evaluative metering mode. I just eyeball the scene and set exposure base on what I want from that in manual. So generally I also don't care about the metering mode.
I often use highlight weighted spot metering with my Nikon in dark theaters with spotlights in aperture priority.
Thank you, this was immensely helpful. However, I don't understand how you "lock the exposure" before recomposing the shot.
All metering patterns and methods work, some are simply easier to implement than others in certain circumstances. In truth, I will use whatever method I think is easier in a given situation.
I believe to truly be a consistent photographer you need to understand the benefits and detriments of each pattern and method. Knowing how the pattern or reference value determines the recommended exposure, be it Eval/Matrix, Spot, Incident, or Reference Values is paramount to this understanding.
I've been photographing with cameras that didn't have a built-in meter, but the negatives were processed by a professional photographer who used a self-levelling developer. That was in the seventies when I was nearly a teenager. Over the years I've learned to work with all these systems and when "photographing" there is no other mode but manual for me. The amount of control is impeccable that way. When the kids - and grandchildren - are doing lovely things in the garden, I prefer matrix metering. On every camera (Canon, Olympus or Nikon) this gives the best results globally. Depending on the subject and the background, I use exposure correction. For fast and candid photography the matrix metering is best, but it happens - mostly on Canon - that I prefer centre-weighted metering.
What works best though, is checking the histogram, even when doing action photography (kids, animals, sports). In such situations the surrounding lighting condition is known and in that case even manual mode (sports indoor i.e.) works very well. I used some test shots (in manual mode, that is) before the play and evaluated the histogram and the possible - usable - shutter speed. I set the aperture and ISO to values that worked to get the preferred shutter speed and kept those values throughout the event. The results were better than I expected, actually.
Yes negatives and the C41 processing was very forgiving you could extract more than a stop either way, unlike E6 slide film where the exposures needed to be at least a quarter of a stop on target. When I worked in darkrooms we used to sometimes 'clip test' slide film by processing one frame or sheet as a test, evaluating the exposure and then adjust the processing time and temperature to get more or less exposure out of the film. This was called 'Push' or 'Pull' processing and could often rescue an incorrectly exposed slide/transparency film.
@@VisualEducationStudio In case I used Kodachrome or Ektachrome, my Sekonic L-398A did good work. Since films like these were calibrated to match a calibrated ASA-value, the external meter was useful there (although the spot meter in the Olympus OM-2 Spot Program did an excellent job *), but since digital cameras interpret ISO-values quite different, the only true way for me is the histogram.
*) this reminds me that I trained myself to interpret different surfaces to the meter values: Caucasian skin would be 2/3 step higher; grass was mostly 1/3 lower as well as dry tarmac, etc... a leftover from my early experiments with black-and-white film where I translated the colours in my head to greyscales or luminance values. That still comes in handy! Of course, using the Sphere on the Sekonic excluded this "trick" because no reflective colours were involved.
The explanations given are true. One thing to keep in mind however, is that all the modes are based on 18% reflectance.
As longest I'm on Manuel mode the metering doesn't matter? Thank you for your answer
When I trained in 1990 we learnt sensitometry and the zone system, basically how to measure the tonal range of a scene and increase/decrease exposure and development to produce a printable negative, with today's mirrorless cameras the ability to see the histogram makes things so much easier, that and learning to 'read' a scene i.e. does shadow or highlight detail takes presidence makes camera metering choice less of an issue.
Ahh yes the zone system and also using it in the darkroom for printing, those were the days. I do miss a lot of the facets of the analogue way of doing things and am grateful that I cut my teeth back in that day.
Karl is the man. Great content as usual.
This is one of the best videos I’ve found. Very informative. Thank you
Glad you enjoyed it!
I have one example when auto mode could be very helpfull. For example if I'm using camera with digital viewfinder and shooting in very sunny day then screen of my camera will be very dark (compared to daylight) and bad colors. So I just can't rely on my artistic view of correct exposure. In this case I could take big bright monitor with my camera (or some other helping things) or just finger crossed and rely on auto metering. Also auto is good if you should hold hour camera in strange position like very close to the ground or very high and you just can't see what is going on in viewfinder. In this case it's ok, better then trying to find stairs somewhere in the mountains for example. And RAW have enough stored data to correct mistake of +- 1 EV without big problems.
Karl thanks so much for sharing your talents so freely. I always learn something, even when I go back to review. Grateful.
Best teacher ever
Thank you Munarara :-)
Yes you can use exposure compensation and find out which metering mode to use and waste half an hour or just use the spot meter and check on screen and see if it's ok...
Yes exactly what I said
@@VisualEducationStudio and that is why I like your vodeos 😉
Thank you! This is a great vid and I like your style and way of thinking!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thank you Karl :) All your vidéos are perfect, easy to understand, very interesting. The best tutorials on the web :)
Thank you.
Got a manual lens on a camera that doesn't support metering with it. I planned to set it manualy and then adjust based on the readings frm screen and histogram. To my surprise the adjustment was needed only the first couple times. Then the exposure turned out to be just what I expected from looking on the seen. So I don't care if there is a meeter at all.
Amazing video, truly great. I was watching while I had my camera in-hand.
Metering Naming is a great angle to put in some marketing and differentiation. I am pretty sure that whoever came up with "matrix" scored a bonus.
You just earned a new subscriber ❤️ it's very easy to understand well executed 😎😎
Karl, you put a smile on my face, cause I don't either, I think it is spot hehehehe.
Always shoot manual, look at the picture in view finder, look at the histogram and most of the time, just by gut feeling !
Thanks for sharing !
Thank you.
Very patiently and nicely explained , thanks
This was very well composed lesson. Easy to follow, both the theory and recommendations/examples.
Really enjoyed that, mm is easier once you’ve got over the hoodoo
Ironically, I feel easier to work on manual mode and just check the histogram than relying on decisions taken by the camera. I am still struggling to understand semi automatic modes.
“A” or aperture priority let’s you pick the aperture and iso, the camera uses its metering to choose a shutter speed. “S” or shutter priority let’s you choose the shutter speed and iso and the cameras metering will choose an aperture to properly expose. Depending on the shot you need you choose one over the other (such as bokeh or needing a high shutter speed for action)
I'm kinda the same. I went straight to M mode have never messed with other modes
same 4 me, started in film days in manual and never learned the simi-auto modes.
Thanks Mr Karl Taylor for posting.
I use Matrix metering because I want to go down the rabbit hole and explore how to expose for different situations in manual mode and unplug myself from all these jargons that make gear holic reviewers switch camera systems and cause others to follow them like blind Lemmings.
In other words, excellent video.👍👍👍
Thank you.
Fine way to explain metering
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you for sharing such a wonderful insight about metering modes. I had been looking for such detailed explanation about metering mode since long.
Glad it was helpful!
Thanks. Great again!
Great video 👌🏼
Hi, pls what do you mean by your subject in center of the frame for center weighted average mode. What is the frame? How can I understand my frame in the view finder? Do you have a video for it? Pls i might sounds stupid, i just need to get this once and for all. Thank you.
The frame is the entire area of your picture or your viewfinder which is a representation of your picture area
@@VisualEducationStudio thank you 🙏🏿
You’re a blessing
cheers karl great course thank you
Back in the day, Sony Handycams boasted of being able to expose for the highlights and shadows automatically at the same time. Sounds like HDR right? What happened to that technology? I think newer, more advanced mirrorless can do that for photos, or can't they?
Canon has highlight tone priority feature, that may be similar to what you are describing.
I lot of the newer cameras can generate a HDR JPEG, and a few of the newest are even able to do HDR RAW. Depending on what I'm trying to convey, though, sometimes I'll want the shadows to go to 0 or the highlights to 255. As an old Zone System photographer, I usually begin an exposure by deciding where I want the mid-tones to fall. I prefer to make further adjustments--dodging and burning, as it used to be called--in post for final image refinement or to adjust the image for whichever paper I'm printing on.
Great video ! Tks. Very clear.
Glad it was helpful!
Excellent explanation
Glad you liked it
If you shoot manual mode, do you need metering modes? I’m confused.
Nevermind. I looked at your website and got the answer.
“It’s only really when you’re working in automatic or semi-automatic modes that metering really comes in handy.”
@@lewis1180 ok great!
Before i finally bought a pro DSLR i thought that photography is a piece of cake (easy)... But after I got my 5D Mark III, and watching many tutorials, tips, etc... I am overwhelmed a little bit 😟
If you go through our free course you will find it much easier karltayloreducation.com/free-photography-course/
I prefer and almost exclusively use spot+AEL with the help of necessary manual focus support to be honest.
Just subscribed Karl … excellent content , many thanks 🙏 have a great day , cheers Gary
Wow, thank you. You are a great teacher.
Wow, thank you!
Metering modes made easy in lucidity. I have a question: With everything set in a lighting situation how does the camera mechanism work when exposer compensation is set to a higher or lower value? Does this make the shutter speed or aperture or ISO adjustment (s) automatically or otherwise and if so how does the camera hold the same preselected exposure set given to the lighting situation?
A good question. It depends on the mode you are in, so if in AV then it will adjust ISO or shutter speed. If in TV then it will adjust ISO or aperture. If in full manual the Sony adjusts the ISO, on Canon I don't know because I adjust it all manually without bothering with the exp comp.
Impressive work.
Excellently explained as usual! thanks for breaking it down to really nice parts
My pleasure!
Smart to use a grey sweater on the model ;)
Happy accident.
Great video! I started learning more about metering modes and in theory it makes sense but a bit frustrating in practice - for example my 70D is supposed to measure light in spot metering mode based on where the focus point is but when I try it seems like it is only measuring from the small spot in the centre of the screen that cannot be moved ? (same for partial ). Have I understood this wrong?
You'd have to check your manual and also the menu on the camera to see if you have activated that feature.
I need to check those two brands out, never heard of a nickon or the h one...
Great information! Thanks...
Sir I have a small doubt.. please... If I go to multiple flashes with trigger.. if I do not use 15 to 20 minutes flashes in the shooting.. again if I triggered is it fire or go to off mode.. is their any option too sir...
Most flashes have a 'sleep' mode which you may be able to deactivate.
Thank you sir
Thank you very much, it was very informative and helpful
Glad it was helpful!
Hi @Karl Taylor : I have a doubt, which I have asked many, but not got an answer at all. Why don't camera makers introduce a bracketing with Spot, Centre weighted, average and evaluative metering. Is it not good to have such bracketing in complex situations where photographer do not have time to experiment or might miss the shot due to wrong selection of metering.
Hi, I'm sure some of the current camera models do have exposure bracketing.
@@VisualEducationStudio I have Nikon Z7, Z5 and D850. None of these models have bracketing on metering modes.
I have the Nikon Z30 and there is a complete auto bracketing set in the photo shooting menu. AE and flash, AE, Flash, WB and ADL.
Another great video. Thanks!
Thanks for watching
Super informative video. Remember the time we bracketing for have a safe exposure 😁😁😁
Thanks
I usually shoot landscape images using fixed aperture at a fixed iso. Having switched to mirrorless I now adjust exposure by monitoring the histogram as I change the shutter speed. I can do this totally manually but often find it quicker to choose aperture priority with evaluative or spot metering to get me close and use exposure compensation for final correction.
Aperture priority is useful when the illumination varies a lot (clouds hovering on a windy day), but for widefield landscapes that is seldom useful because the shadows of these clouds are only partially covering the landscape.
Excellent job. You explained every thing in great details. I would definitely go to your web site for more knowledge. Thanks, indeed
Glad it was helpful!
Professor Karl!
😊
I used to be a analogue spotmetering expert:))
This is best video and best info photographers should watch this video more understands
Thank you.
Very useful and saving a lot of time. Thanks for sharing Sir 🙏🏼😘🌺
My pleasure
I think metering mode will be way better in the future, for example take the face priority setting for the sony alpha, it is getting way better by the day and ai solution will come for the next generations where you can just input your object - meaning your style of photography - and the ai will quickly understand the way you want to shoot and will give you the correct exposure
When difference between what you see on camerascreen is very different from what you see on computer at home, going from normal to underexposed?
This has happened to me, sometimes the ambient conditions shooting in bright light mean the screen doesn't stand out as much as you would like, just like looking at a phone in the sun. In the menu settings of most cameras though there is a brightness adjust for the screen only which helps but you need to remember to put it back when indoors or it will look wrong the other way too. I also usually have a black cloth in my bag to throw over my head to look at the camera.
The camera display is neither calibrated nor profiled and displays an 8-bit jpeg thumbnail, therefore not the most reliable way to assess exposure.
I was taught in portrait photography to meter close to the subject with a light meter or camera meter. Is that still the case?
Spot metering
thanks! Simple and clear!
You're welcome
Thank You soooooooo much sir
Most welcome
This content is incredible 👍
Cheers.
Which mode would you use for football 🏈
you shoot mostly with the 100mp lens, dat's always sharp clear and crisphy, right.
Hi the lens is not 100mp, I think you mean focal length. 100mm is my favourite focal length but here we were using a 70-200 if I remember correctly
Product photography on white background. White on white, gray on white, black on white... Here, the best choice is spot, right? The aim is to fiddle as less as possible in raw dev, object correctly metered and background white
Actually our next video is a about white on white. Every Tuesday we post a video.
Thank You Karl !!!!!
Welcome.
We❤️ your videos always
Thank you.
thank you Karl! very cool and well served information! are you based in england?
In the UK
Great video Karl! Tapping your Rolex on the table when you gestured gave me ocd though ! Lol
I often take a first shot with spot metering and a simplified zone system, then adjust the exposure based on the result.
Good vid thanks for sharing 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks for watching!
Karl is a World Class teacher of photography. I'm always wanting to improve my skills. I think I'm going to join a monthly subscription as he's made it very affordable. ❤️
Thank you and I look forward to seeing you there!
Fantastic tutorial thank you 🙏🏼
Glad you enjoyed it!
Good information
Thanks
Very well said, thank you.
Thanks for watching!
Thank you ❤️🙏
Welcome!
Brilliant thanks
Very welcome
Karl, thanks a lot I am a amateur photographer your video helped me a lot. Continue the good work!
Thanks, will do!
Only use a meter for large format film No point with Digital