What many people may not notice are the solar masses (SM) of each black hole. The smallest one is 3 SM, meaning it has the mass of 3 of our suns even though it’s a tiny diameter (relatively speaking).
That small one actualy is a ball that is size of a small city but its still 10 times heavier than whole solar system including sun ,planets moons and all asteroids😂
Something wrong is not right! As far as I know, the size of a black hole is measured by the edges of its event horizon, not the size of the surrounding accretion disk!
very impressed with this video. I have always been interested in astronomy and physics. It was things like this that drove me to enter those professions. Thank you for feeding my insatiable curiosity about the universe and the wonders that we discove
Same joke repeated a million times every day. This video is not even a camera-like view, it's just some model of objects placed one close to another. You're not funny and especially not original at all.
What impresses me most is how a relatively tiny black hole like Sagittarius A* (just a couple times the size of our sun) keeps an entire galaxy together. Yes, I know all the mass it has already attracted contributes to that, but still impressive. Even an aggregation of mass a bunch of lightyears across vs 100,000 light years and an immense mass of stars.
that means the entire solar system, even the oort cloud, would be sucked in, with alpha centauri a, b, and proxima centauri soon after. and then, our neighbors, and eventually, the galaxy gets sucked in.
I don't think blackhole will ever reach that size as it would simply mean the entirety of universe is rotating around it and not sure what ripple effects it will cause in spacetime and entire structure of the universe.
@@hyperjanny1510 Yep such a blackhole will be a galaxy sized one and will be larger than the combined mass of the three largest galaxies in our local group that is Andromeda, Milky Way and Triangulum galaxies.
Is there any explanation for why some are bigger even though they have less mass? For example, you say M33 X-7 has less mass than LMC X-3 yet it is substantially bigger.
Could be the accretion disk. It forms when a black hole is "eating" it's all of the matter that's been ripped to shreds and is orbiting the black hole slowly falling in towards the event horizon to as far as we know be merged with the singularity but who really knows what happens at the point. Also could be they got the data wrong... Edit: They got the data wrong. LMC X-3 is estimated to be between 5-13 solar masses not 19.
For distant objects like black holes, there is no absolute certainty on their distances from Earth and therefore, their masses. It's always a range of masses, that infer the black hole diameter. I guess that the video creator didn't look very thorougly to this and just put the first value they saw. The ratio between black holes masses and radius is always the same ( roughly 3km radius for 1 solar mass)
No, Sag A* diameter is 24 millions km, Earth orbit radius is 149 millions km. You are mixing it with M87* which is roughly 1.000 times heavier than Sag A*
just hit me with the small one., that other shit is just bananas. Whats wilder is imagining the sheer size of the star that collapsed to create the massive ones. YIKERS!
Hoo Always in love to an Ultra-Massive *'OJ 287'* as it has a Super-Massive blackhole orbiting it, giving an idea of a _'true'_ vacuum cleaner of a solar system 😘 Also, the *'Feirall 9'* ?? Never heard of it before, but the name sure is _noice_ 👍
Impressive Presentation. Tho in few years, Phoenix A* will be outclassed eventually. Who knows what bigger size of Black Holes our universe are still hiding
There is huge incertainty about the mass of Phoenix A* he's probably lighter than those 100 Bn solar masses. Same goes for TON-618 and some other ultramassive black holes, as their intense radiation dosen't allow for a very accruate measurement of their distances, and therefore, their masses.
Wrong info , Firstly largest known star is UY scuti with a radius of 1.8 B Kms. Secondly Radius of Stephenson dfk is 1.5 B kms not 3B kms. So please upload correct information
From Small To Big With Colours 1. AO620-00 - 3 sm - Orange 2. GRO J0422+32 - 3.6 sm - Orange 3. IGR J17091-3624 - 6 sm - White 4. XTE J1118+480 - 8 SM - Blue Reddish (blue) 5. XTE J1859+226 - 10 SM - Blue 6. 4U 1630-47 - 13 SM - Orange 7. GRO J0422+32 - 16 sm - Orange 8. SWIFT J1357.2-0933 - 17 SM - Orange 9. GS 1124-68 - 18 SM - Blue 10. XTE J1817-330 - 18 SM - Blue 11. LMC X-3 - 19 SM - Blue 12. M33 X-7 - 16 sm - Green 13. M82 X-1 - 450 SM - Orange 14. GCIRS 13E - 1300 SM - orange 15. Messier 32 - 3M sm - Orange 16. SAGITTARIUS A* - 4.3m SM - orange 17. M61 - 5m SM - White 18. NGC 7469 - 6.5m SM - White 19. M60 UCD1 - 25m SM - Orange 20. M60 UCD1 - 25m SM - Orange 21. 3C 130 - 24m SM - Orange 22. M 180 - 24m SM - Red 23. M 82 - 28m SM - Yellow 24. M 58 - 60m SM - White 25. FAIRALL 9 - 80m SM - White 26. OJ 287 - 150m SM - Bright Yellow (yellow) 27. 3C 390.3 - 340m SM - Orange 28. 3C 273 - 890m SM - Yellow 29. UGC 12806 - 1.3B SM - Red 30. ABELL 1201 - 1.4B SM - Orange 31. QSO B0749+254 5.2B SM - Yellow 32. POWEHI - 7.5B SM - Red 33. NGC 3842 - 10B SM - Yellow 34. HOLMBERG 15A SM - 10B - White 35. SDSS 074521 - 15B SM - Yellow 36. NGC 1600 - 18B SM - Red 37. APM 08279+5255 - 25B SM - Yellow 38. H1821+643 - 26B SM - Yellow 39. J2187 - 35B SM - Red 40. IC 1101 - 50B SM - Red 41. TON 618 - 70B SM - Yellow 42. PHOENIX A* - 110B SM - White Pin pls? Can i get a like? :) Edit: Where is the "Unicorn" Black Hole? Is it not here? Edit 2: Thanks For The Pin! Btw if u dont know, SM is "Solar Masses"
So, is there undiscovered stars that haven’t been discovered that literally take 1/8 of the whole universe? Or is it that these Black Holes are so old, that they’ve spent the last Billions of years absorbing other Black Holes and keep growing and growing?
They’re old and they’ve eaten a lot of matter and energy. The biggest ones are bigger than current models can explain, i.e there hasn’t been enough time since time began for black holes to eat this much and grow this big. Attempts to solve the mystery are ongoing.
There isn't a definitive explanation for supermassive black hole formation. The universe is too young for them to have been able to grow solely on accretion of matter. It has been proposed some models to create the seeds of supermassive black holes : Direct collapse of neutral hydrogen clouds and quasi stars (stars sustaining equilibrium partially trough dark matter particles annihilation, able to grow to thousands of solar masses, far beyond what normal starts are able, even for population III) that form black holes in their cores. But those hypothesis remain very speculatives for now, as collecting datas from those distant times is very difficult.
@@jhtrq1465 I wonder if it is possible for a galaxy to be absorbed into a black hole. But then again has the universe allowed enough time for that? I know the basic understanding that anything can become a black hole as long as its mass has been compressed into a certain threshold of the singularity. Could dark matter be in this example? Could the invisible, undetectable dark matter be somehow compressed into a singularity? One thing I’ll always remember, energy has never changed and has always been here. So whatever the answer, it’s an answer with already current knowledge. Just not understood.
@@cypresslos Sorry for the very late answer. I guess that in theory, yes a black hole could swallow an entiere galaxy, but in reality, a galaxy and his orbit is a very complex n-body problem. What happen when a star loose angular momentum to fall into the black hole, is that his angular momentum is transfered to other bodies of the system. So for one star that will plunge into the black hole, other will get more orbital speed. I don't know the excat ratio, but roughly, for each star falling, you will have another that will be ejected away. For Dark Matter, yes you could form a black hole with it too, but the problem is that DM has no other mean to interact and dissipate his kinetic energy than the very weak gravitationnal force. Where baryonic matter can evacuate kinetic energy trough friction and heat, emmitting electromagnetic radiations, DM cannot, and so according to the models remain into very diffuse halos, as it cannot loose his speed and congregate into dense objects.
Our best explanation is all the mass compresses to a single point of infinite density. Since we can't see past the event horizon we'll never really know with certainty but it's a good theory considering how insane the gravitational pull is.
And to think Sagittarius A is our own galaxy’s center black hole and is on the smaller side compared to everything that comes after it! Really puts you into perspective of how powerful black holes truly are! It’s scary to know there are even bigger ones like TON 💀
@julinho218 do you mean the accretion disc? Technically, that's not part of the black hole, it's matter that it's absorbing and its size would differ based on how much material it has falling into it at any one time.
@@julinho218 You said "accretion disc," but for some weird reason, my brain read "event horizon!" I get what you mean now. There must've been too much alcohol past my event horizon that night!
@@俺は誰でもない They are easy to find if they are in a close binary system, where we can see their effect on the orbit of the bright compainion, or the stuff being accreted. If the black hole is alone, you'll be very lucky to find one, as you only have the eventual lensing effect when the Earth, the black hole and a star in the background are aligned. I don't know if some have been detected that way.
Yes. Every mass bends space-time. Those effects are so intense for black holes that their horizons appear 2.6 times larger than they really are. In other words, you can "see" the back of a black hole when you look at it.
Yeah, but quickly it's nothing but numbers. How big are they compared to our solar system. And does that number represent the sphere, or does it include the disk? On a separate note, are those first few strong enough to collapse our solar system? Have scientists calculated the event horizon in theory?
The formula for calculating the size of an event horizon is well known ( just google it if you want the specific ) and it give roughly 3km in radius for 1 solar mass. M87* ( Powehi ) with his 6 billions solar masses has a radius of 20 billions kilometers, around 5 times the size of Neptune's orbit. The first black holes shown in the video are tiny, but still at least 3-4 times the mass of the Sun, if one them were to fly by near our solar system, it will wreck havoc, first by destabilizing the Oort cloud, sending hoards of comets toward the inner solar system, resulting in numerous comet impacts on the planets, as it come close the black hole will mess up the planetary orbit, ejecting some of them in interstellar space and other plunging toward the Sun. Finally, if the black hole is on a trajectory and speed that allow to capture the Sun, they will orbit each other, eventually, the black hole will rip apart the Sun, creating an accretion disk around it, that will blast away intense radiation across all the electromagnetic spectrum as the infalling matter heat up to billions of Kelvins due to friction forces. In short, everybody dies.
To put into context of how much gravity a black hole has. Saggittarius A is the one at the center of our galaxy keeping our solar system and a billion other stars in orbit.
No, it's the dark matter that keeps stuff together. Also, the matter of everything else in the galaxy helps too. The black hole in the center is not that decisive in keeping the galaxy together.
That's just wrong, Saggitarius A* mass is negligeable compared to the Milky way total mass (2,06 X 10^11 solar masses) All stars orbit around the barycenter of the galaxy, which happen to have a supermassive black hole in there, because some mass tend to accumulate here by loss of angular momentum. If you removed Saggitarius A* from the galaxy, there would be no noticeable changes for the orbits of the stars. The only ones affected would be the stars directly orbiting the black hole (S01, S02...)
Not black holes 1:35 The Moon 1:56 Earth 2:10 The Sun 2:56 Rigel 4:01 Stephenson 2 DFK 1 5:26 IC 1101 (Looks like a black hole in the image, but is actually a galaxy)
How is it that two SMBHs with similar mass (NGC 3842 and HOLMBERG 1 5A) have different sizes? Also, how can LMC X-3 be ~65% the size of M33 X-7 yet ~119% more massive? I would’ve thought the size increase would be directly proportional to the mass…
У вас некорректно выглядят некоторые черные дыры. Аккреционный диск у всех должен быть горизонтальным и вертикальным. В реальности существует только горизонтальный диск, а вертикальный - это тот же горизонтальный, только с другой стороны от чёрной дыры (его свечение искривляется черной дырой таким образом, что он нам кажется вертикальным). И по этой же причине эти два диска не могут быть разных цветов. Если горизонтальный диск одного цвета, то и вертикальный должен быть того же цвета. Спасибо за внимание и контент!
NASA scientists have identified the lightest black hole yet, just 3.8 times the mass of the sun, in a binary star system in the Milky Way known as XTE J1650-500. The next smallest black hole, spotted in 1994, weighed in at 6.3 solar masses.
This video creates the impression that the diameter of a black hole is the diameter of its accretion disc. See 3:13 . But that's wrong. It's the diameter of the sphere that these numbers describe.
it seems like the person who made this confused the diameter of the event horizon and the diameter of the accretion disc, but the video is still awesome!
Yeah I don't think the person is confused maybe you are no offense but the stated distance km/mi is measured across the entirety of the object black hole, stars, and moon alike.
I just noticed a massive flaw in your simulation. The size of the black holes indicated in the video includes the accretion disk. You can see this by comparing the diameters shown for the moon and the black holes beside it at 1:45. Notice how the moon is bigger even though the black hole has a larger diameter? The diameter of a black hole refers to twice its schwarzschild radius, which is a function of its mass. This extends from the singularity to the event horizon, which is even smaller than the photon ring (the innermost ring of light you can see for each black hole), at around half the size. This simulation falsely includes not only the photon ring but the entire accretion disk in the black holes' diameter, making them appear smaller than they actually are in comparison to the reference bodies you used like the moon. What I mean is that the black hole is just the ball in the middle, not including the ring around it. The ring shouldn't be counted as part of the radius of the black hole, but that's what was done here, making them look smaller than they actually are. In those comparisons, the central spheres and not the accretion disks should have similar sizes to the moon.
![Black Hole Size Comparison [4K] | 3d Animation Universe Size Comparison | Data Playz](/img/n.gif)
5:50 *Phoenix A, Sorry Guys :)
Bro u accidently wrote Pheonix A* but from walmart 💀💀💀💀😂
Bro u put phonics A (*not trying to be rude*)
Awesome video bro. I didn’t know they could get that small!
What’s the name of the second song starting at 3:30
The song?
Edit: super ez
I'm
What many people may not notice are the solar masses (SM) of each black hole. The smallest one is 3 SM, meaning it has the mass of 3 of our suns even though it’s a tiny diameter (relatively speaking).
Exactly 💯
Thank you ❤️
Fr the smallest ones may look small but they still contain the mass of our solar system 😂
Also that the sizes of the black holes are really the sizes of it's gravitational shadow....not the object itself.
Everyone noticed it. It’s right there. 😂
That small one actualy is a ball that is size of a small city but its still 10 times heavier than whole solar system including sun ,planets moons and all asteroids😂
The tiny ones are cute. Gives me a hope to have my own one :)
Before you own it, it already suck our whole solar system
You crazy or what
@@Raikitsu no but if it eats a bunch then yes
You already have one…tiny black hole. We all do.
@tradde11he will in it😌
1:34 Moon (Comparison)
1:53 Earth (Comparison)
2:11 Sun (Compairison)
2:59 Rigel (Compairison)
4:00 Stephenson 2 Dfk 1 (Compairison)
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤❤❤🎉🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉😊❤😂😊❤😂😊❤🎉😊😊😊😊😅😅😮😮😮😮😢😢😢🎉🎉😢❤🎉❤😢❤😢😂😮🎉😮😅🎉😢😅😮😮😊😅😅😊
I did not know some black holes are smaller than our moon AND earth ❤ Subscribe
Stellar black holes are really tiny. Roughly 1 solar mass = 3km radius.
Something wrong is not right! As far as I know, the size of a black hole is measured by the edges of its event horizon, not the size of the surrounding accretion disk!
Oh well, it’s still a cool video
@@30acreshop_time Ain't cool if half the stuff is just wrong
🤓
@@jhtrq1465 he meants the quallity
@@CÜBĒ_verb What quality? The video is just full of mistakes
very impressed with this video. I have always been interested in astronomy and physics. It was things like this that drove me to enter those professions. Thank you for feeding my insatiable curiosity about the universe and the wonders that we discove
Thank you so much for your kindness ❤️
I like this vid it tells me more about black holes sizes🎉🎉🎉🎉😊😊😊😊😊😊 thank you data Plaz your the best UA-camr about space and black holes thank you
High quality stuff man👍
Thank you ❤️
Phonics lol, Phoenix A! Amazing video!
Lol, it happens bro 💀
Thank you for the comment
this video just give me some interstellar movie vibes😁keep it up 🔥
Appreciate it brother ❤️
My favorite movie
I really love black holes
Thank you for your effort :D
What's the song that starts at 5:58?
Thanks to the camera man for all his effort 😂
Lol 😂
Same joke repeated a million times every day. This video is not even a camera-like view, it's just some model of objects placed one close to another. You're not funny and especially not original at all.
The camera operator understood the gravity of the situation
It was a camerawoman
@@dqdq4083no
What impresses me most is how a relatively tiny black hole like Sagittarius A* (just a couple times the size of our sun) keeps an entire galaxy together.
Yes, I know all the mass it has already attracted contributes to that, but still impressive. Even an aggregation of mass a bunch of lightyears across vs 100,000 light years and an immense mass of stars.
That animation is no joke. I'm impressed.
Glad you liked it, thanks ❤️
This was awesome! 🙏☀️
Really appreciate it ❤️
Amazingly terrifying it would be to see one up close. Wow!
I watch this type of videos to drop my ego. How tiny is our existance.
This would have been better with the location included or what galaxy they’re from.
Great Idea, Thanks for the suggestion ❤️
good video brother keep it up
Appreciate you bro
👍👍👍
so cool
Prove that the cameraman never dies🗿🗿🗿
Fun fact: if a black hole were to reach the mass of 1.65 Trillion Solar masses it would be roughly 1 Lightyear in diameter.
🤯
Wouldn't that mean nothing escapes?
that means the entire solar system, even the oort cloud, would be sucked in, with alpha centauri a, b, and proxima centauri soon after. and then, our neighbors, and eventually, the galaxy gets sucked in.
I don't think blackhole will ever reach that size as it would simply mean the entirety of universe is rotating around it and not sure what ripple effects it will cause in spacetime and entire structure of the universe.
@@hyperjanny1510 Yep such a blackhole will be a galaxy sized one and will be larger than the combined mass of the three largest galaxies in our local group that is Andromeda, Milky Way and Triangulum galaxies.
Is there any explanation for why some are bigger even though they have less mass? For example, you say M33 X-7 has less mass than LMC X-3 yet it is substantially bigger.
Could be the accretion disk. It forms when a black hole is "eating" it's all of the matter that's been ripped to shreds and is orbiting the black hole slowly falling in towards the event horizon to as far as we know be merged with the singularity but who really knows what happens at the point. Also could be they got the data wrong...
Edit: They got the data wrong. LMC X-3 is estimated to be between 5-13 solar masses not 19.
For distant objects like black holes, there is no absolute certainty on their distances from Earth and therefore, their masses. It's always a range of masses, that infer the black hole diameter. I guess that the video creator didn't look very thorougly to this and just put the first value they saw. The ratio between black holes masses and radius is always the same ( roughly 3km radius for 1 solar mass)
These numbers are crazy 🤯
I know right? 🥲
Thank you very much. What I miss in this presentation is a reference to our solar system. Sagitarius A reaches beyond the Earth's orbit.
Thank you for your support ❤️
No, Sag A* diameter is 24 millions km, Earth orbit radius is 149 millions km. You are mixing it with M87* which is roughly 1.000 times heavier than Sag A*
@@jhtrq1465 You right. Sorry, my bad.
Very interested view 👍👍
I do appreciate the zoom of the cameraman's equipment, not leaving behind his ability to travel that fast to shoot.
just hit me with the small one., that other shit is just bananas.
Whats wilder is imagining the sheer size of the star that collapsed to create the massive ones. YIKERS!
Hoo
Always in love to an Ultra-Massive *'OJ 287'* as it has a Super-Massive blackhole orbiting it, giving an idea of a _'true'_ vacuum cleaner of a solar system 😘
Also, the *'Feirall 9'* ??
Never heard of it before, but the name sure is _noice_ 👍
Thank you my friend ❤️
I think it's just baby we humens can't do anything just descover hand information for nothing
Impressive Presentation. Tho in few years, Phoenix A* will be outclassed eventually.
Who knows what bigger size of Black Holes our universe are still hiding
There is huge incertainty about the mass of Phoenix A* he's probably lighter than those 100 Bn solar masses. Same goes for TON-618 and some other ultramassive black holes, as their intense radiation dosen't allow for a very accruate measurement of their distances, and therefore, their masses.
This is so beautiful 😍
Appreciate your kindness ❤️
it's sad that people barely talk about s50014+81, many people think phoenix a is the biggest one.
Should use"Bn" to denote billion, because it looks like 8 as just B.
Great video and thanks.
Good point, thank you ❤️
(\_/)
( •.• )
(>❤
Woah!!! Someone's been grindin' in black hole simulator 😂😂😂
my ceiling has been blowed... didn't realized that Sagittarius A* was such a dwarf....... thanks so much ! 🤯😘
Thanks for the support ❤️
*Satisfied 😊*
Wrong info , Firstly largest known star is UY scuti with a radius of 1.8 B Kms. Secondly Radius of Stephenson dfk is 1.5 B kms not 3B kms. So please upload correct information
From Small To Big With Colours
1. AO620-00 - 3 sm - Orange
2. GRO J0422+32 - 3.6 sm - Orange
3. IGR J17091-3624 - 6 sm - White
4. XTE J1118+480 - 8 SM - Blue Reddish (blue)
5. XTE J1859+226 - 10 SM - Blue
6. 4U 1630-47 - 13 SM - Orange
7. GRO J0422+32 - 16 sm - Orange
8. SWIFT J1357.2-0933 - 17 SM - Orange
9. GS 1124-68 - 18 SM - Blue
10. XTE J1817-330 - 18 SM - Blue
11. LMC X-3 - 19 SM - Blue
12. M33 X-7 - 16 sm - Green
13. M82 X-1 - 450 SM - Orange
14. GCIRS 13E - 1300 SM - orange
15. Messier 32 - 3M sm - Orange
16. SAGITTARIUS A* - 4.3m SM - orange
17. M61 - 5m SM - White
18. NGC 7469 - 6.5m SM - White
19. M60 UCD1 - 25m SM - Orange
20. M60 UCD1 - 25m SM - Orange
21. 3C 130 - 24m SM - Orange
22. M 180 - 24m SM - Red
23. M 82 - 28m SM - Yellow
24. M 58 - 60m SM - White
25. FAIRALL 9 - 80m SM - White
26. OJ 287 - 150m SM - Bright Yellow (yellow)
27. 3C 390.3 - 340m SM - Orange
28. 3C 273 - 890m SM - Yellow
29. UGC 12806 - 1.3B SM - Red
30. ABELL 1201 - 1.4B SM - Orange
31. QSO B0749+254 5.2B SM - Yellow
32. POWEHI - 7.5B SM - Red
33. NGC 3842 - 10B SM - Yellow
34. HOLMBERG 15A SM - 10B - White
35. SDSS 074521 - 15B SM - Yellow
36. NGC 1600 - 18B SM - Red
37. APM 08279+5255 - 25B SM - Yellow
38. H1821+643 - 26B SM - Yellow
39. J2187 - 35B SM - Red
40. IC 1101 - 50B SM - Red
41. TON 618 - 70B SM - Yellow
42. PHOENIX A* - 110B SM - White
Pin pls?
Can i get a like? :)
Edit: Where is the "Unicorn" Black Hole? Is it not here?
Edit 2: Thanks For The Pin! Btw if u dont know, SM is "Solar Masses"
I don't know if blackholes have color
eso 444-46💀☠️💀☠️💀☠️💀
So, is there undiscovered stars that haven’t been discovered that literally take 1/8 of the whole universe? Or is it that these Black Holes are so old, that they’ve spent the last Billions of years absorbing other Black Holes and keep growing and growing?
They’re old and they’ve eaten a lot of matter and energy. The biggest ones are bigger than current models can explain, i.e there hasn’t been enough time since time began for black holes to eat this much and grow this big. Attempts to solve the mystery are ongoing.
There isn't a definitive explanation for supermassive black hole formation. The universe is too young for them to have been able to grow solely on accretion of matter. It has been proposed some models to create the seeds of supermassive black holes : Direct collapse of neutral hydrogen clouds and quasi stars (stars sustaining equilibrium partially trough dark matter particles annihilation, able to grow to thousands of solar masses, far beyond what normal starts are able, even for population III) that form black holes in their cores. But those hypothesis remain very speculatives for now, as collecting datas from those distant times is very difficult.
@@jhtrq1465 I wonder if it is possible for a galaxy to be absorbed into a black hole. But then again has the universe allowed enough time for that? I know the basic understanding that anything can become a black hole as long as its mass has been compressed into a certain threshold of the singularity. Could dark matter be in this example? Could the invisible, undetectable dark matter be somehow compressed into a singularity? One thing I’ll always remember, energy has never changed and has always been here. So whatever the answer, it’s an answer with already current knowledge. Just not understood.
@@cypresslos Sorry for the very late answer. I guess that in theory, yes a black hole could swallow an entiere galaxy, but in reality, a galaxy and his orbit is a very complex n-body problem. What happen when a star loose angular momentum to fall into the black hole, is that his angular momentum is transfered to other bodies of the system. So for one star that will plunge into the black hole, other will get more orbital speed. I don't know the excat ratio, but roughly, for each star falling, you will have another that will be ejected away.
For Dark Matter, yes you could form a black hole with it too, but the problem is that DM has no other mean to interact and dissipate his kinetic energy than the very weak gravitationnal force. Where baryonic matter can evacuate kinetic energy trough friction and heat, emmitting electromagnetic radiations, DM cannot, and so according to the models remain into very diffuse halos, as it cannot loose his speed and congregate into dense objects.
What’s the name of the second song? That song should be in Stellaris.
The song starts at 3:30
Title Historical Moments - Mod Modes .
Super cool! Black holes have always interested me, where does all the mass go? We’ll find a white hole one of these days..
Thank you so much. I'm glad you liked it ❤️
The mass remains, just packed into a smaller size
Our best explanation is all the mass compresses to a single point of infinite density. Since we can't see past the event horizon we'll never really know with certainty but it's a good theory considering how insane the gravitational pull is.
usually it is 400 billion grams per centimeter.
And to think Sagittarius A is our own galaxy’s center black hole and is on the smaller side compared to everything that comes after it! Really puts you into perspective of how powerful black holes truly are! It’s scary to know there are even bigger ones like TON 💀
05:37 *Ton 618 sorry :)
If you're wondering SM means solar mass
👌❤️
Well, that was terrifying...
The big ones we would see a long time before they got near , but those little omes ...
Just imagine there are probably hundrets of planets out of our galaxy ❤
Props to the subtitles who teach about black holes
please can someone explain why they measure the black hole by the edge of the accretion disc?
Because there'd be nothing to measure if they went by the size of the singularity.
@@Helbore but that's not my point. The outer size of the disc seems to have much larger radius compared to the event horizon.
@julinho218 do you mean the accretion disc? Technically, that's not part of the black hole, it's matter that it's absorbing and its size would differ based on how much material it has falling into it at any one time.
@@Helbore I know. But apparently they are measuring the BH by the size of the accretion disk if you pay close attention
@@julinho218 You said "accretion disc," but for some weird reason, my brain read "event horizon!" I get what you mean now.
There must've been too much alcohol past my event horizon that night!
good video bro😀
Appreciate it bro ❤️
How did you find these black hole
is measurement on event horizon or accretion disk size?
It must have been hard to find the black holes that were smaller than the moon.
👌❤️
not too hard, the effects of their gravity are very obvious
@@俺は誰でもない They are easy to find if they are in a close binary system, where we can see their effect on the orbit of the bright compainion, or the stuff being accreted. If the black hole is alone, you'll be very lucky to find one, as you only have the eventual lensing effect when the Earth, the black hole and a star in the background are aligned. I don't know if some have been detected that way.
The fact that these are compressed makes me wonder how extremely enormous they must have been before they were black holes
whats the edit name where I can edit like this video can you tell me plzzz
Blender
Wow
Beautiful
Thank you ❤️
Kind of terrifying they can be so small honestly. Especially with scientists mucking around.
¡5:35 the ton 618 is my favourite!
Abell 12O1: oh,really?
Phoenix A*:where did you come from bro?
Do not turn captions on if you do, have fun reading really fast captions
Спасибо оператору, что собрал все черные дыры и планеты, чтобы показать нам их размеры
7:23 earth is bigger than a black hole 😂💀🙃
Good and interesting videos🔥
Glad you think so!
cameraman never dies
Whats about sdss j1408?
How did you done this
Did you measure it by the hole or with the ring
Would've they all have gravitational lensing?
Yes. Every mass bends space-time. Those effects are so intense for black holes that their horizons appear 2.6 times larger than they really are. In other words, you can "see" the back of a black hole when you look at it.
Yeah, but quickly it's nothing but numbers. How big are they compared to our solar system. And does that number represent the sphere, or does it include the disk? On a separate note, are those first few strong enough to collapse our solar system? Have scientists calculated the event horizon in theory?
The formula for calculating the size of an event horizon is well known ( just google it if you want the specific ) and it give roughly 3km in radius for 1 solar mass. M87* ( Powehi ) with his 6 billions solar masses has a radius of 20 billions kilometers, around 5 times the size of Neptune's orbit.
The first black holes shown in the video are tiny, but still at least 3-4 times the mass of the Sun, if one them were to fly by near our solar system, it will wreck havoc, first by destabilizing the Oort cloud, sending hoards of comets toward the inner solar system, resulting in numerous comet impacts on the planets, as it come close the black hole will mess up the planetary orbit, ejecting some of them in interstellar space and other plunging toward the Sun. Finally, if the black hole is on a trajectory and speed that allow to capture the Sun, they will orbit each other, eventually, the black hole will rip apart the Sun, creating an accretion disk around it, that will blast away intense radiation across all the electromagnetic spectrum as the infalling matter heat up to billions of Kelvins due to friction forces.
In short, everybody dies.
To put into context of how much gravity a black hole has. Saggittarius A is the one at the center of our galaxy keeping our solar system and a billion other stars in orbit.
Mind-blowing 🤯
And it's tiny compared to most of the others we know of.
No, it's the dark matter that keeps stuff together. Also, the matter of everything else in the galaxy helps too. The black hole in the center is not that decisive in keeping the galaxy together.
That's just wrong, Saggitarius A* mass is negligeable compared to the Milky way total mass (2,06 X 10^11 solar masses) All stars orbit around the barycenter of the galaxy, which happen to have a supermassive black hole in there, because some mass tend to accumulate here by loss of angular momentum. If you removed Saggitarius A* from the galaxy, there would be no noticeable changes for the orbits of the stars. The only ones affected would be the stars directly orbiting the black hole (S01, S02...)
Ета. Ета. Круто
Not black holes
1:35 The Moon
1:56 Earth
2:10 The Sun
2:56 Rigel
4:01 Stephenson 2 DFK 1
5:26 IC 1101 (Looks like a black hole in the image, but is actually a galaxy)
It was in the center of the ic 1011,you did not know that?
Respect to camera man
TON 618 in real life 💀💀 TON 618 in geometry dash ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
Very very nice 👌 👍 😀 👏 😊 good ♥️ 🖤 😀 👏 👍 👌 ♥️ 🖤 😀 music nice 😋 😀 👌 👍
Appreciate it ❤️
How is it that two SMBHs with similar mass (NGC 3842 and HOLMBERG 1 5A) have different sizes? Also, how can LMC X-3 be ~65% the size of M33 X-7 yet ~119% more massive? I would’ve thought the size increase would be directly proportional to the mass…
A brave camera man
I thought TON 618 was the largest one... Do we know when did Phoenix A appeared?
me too
Why it's have Two M60-UCD1 ?
У вас некорректно выглядят некоторые черные дыры. Аккреционный диск у всех должен быть горизонтальным и вертикальным. В реальности существует только горизонтальный диск, а вертикальный - это тот же горизонтальный, только с другой стороны от чёрной дыры (его свечение искривляется черной дырой таким образом, что он нам кажется вертикальным). И по этой же причине эти два диска не могут быть разных цветов. Если горизонтальный диск одного цвета, то и вертикальный должен быть того же цвета.
Спасибо за внимание и контент!
3:40 (trying to save my spot)
And also that’s not how u spell “phonics” it’s phoenix
Hooked on Phonics A is now king of the block. 😃
Phoenix A*
I had no idea they had found so many black holes smaller than the moon.
How did they find all those black holes and stars lined up like that
NASA scientists have identified the lightest black hole yet, just 3.8 times the mass of the sun, in a binary star system in the Milky Way known as XTE J1650-500. The next smallest black hole, spotted in 1994, weighed in at 6.3 solar masses.
What about
Tritan 1102 that one in the other universe
Impresionante y sublime
Your scaling is off because it was rendering the sizes by their animated accretion disks and not the event horizons.
Nice😊
Thank you ❤️
This video creates the impression that the diameter of a black hole is the diameter of its accretion disc. See 3:13 . But that's wrong. It's the diameter of the sphere that these numbers describe.
it seems like the person who made this confused the diameter of the event horizon and the diameter of the accretion disc, but the video is still awesome!
Yeah I don't think the person is confused maybe you are no offense but the stated distance km/mi is measured across the entirety of the object black hole, stars, and moon alike.
@@juliusevans8216 The acrretion disk isn't the black hole. The ususal measurement is the Schwarzshild radius.
OMG woooooooow!!!!!!!❤❤❤
Thank you so much ❤️
Is'nt 3C 120 a galaxy? So these are the Black holes at the center of a particular galaxy, I get it now, thanks, good vid. a
Usually, the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy take the name of that galaxy with a "*" at the end. Like M87*
What about S5 0014 +81? 2:18
0:27 neon black hole?
I just noticed a massive flaw in your simulation. The size of the black holes indicated in the video includes the accretion disk. You can see this by comparing the diameters shown for the moon and the black holes beside it at 1:45. Notice how the moon is bigger even though the black hole has a larger diameter? The diameter of a black hole refers to twice its schwarzschild radius, which is a function of its mass. This extends from the singularity to the event horizon, which is even smaller than the photon ring (the innermost ring of light you can see for each black hole), at around half the size. This simulation falsely includes not only the photon ring but the entire accretion disk in the black holes' diameter, making them appear smaller than they actually are in comparison to the reference bodies you used like the moon.
What I mean is that the black hole is just the ball in the middle, not including the ring around it. The ring shouldn't be counted as part of the radius of the black hole, but that's what was done here, making them look smaller than they actually are. In those comparisons, the central spheres and not the accretion disks should have similar sizes to the moon.
Apart from that error, this is an amazing animation!
Good Video
Thank you so much 💖
Nice❤
With this sizes I totally understand destiny of Earth life we fall into one of this Black holes
They maybe enormous, but still incredibly tiny compared to the huge distances between stars, not speaking about galaxy.
I would've given those black holes way cooler names.
If you speed up the text a bit more then you can makesure that no one is able to read it...