Wow this is genuinely such a good explanation of the relationship between the three lines, as well as the other relevant bodies. Very helpful for my final :)
Great quality content, which consicely summarises the model. Mark breaks down each component in an easy to follow manner applying personal insights and business knowledge. Really valuable video, will definitely be watching further videos
Mark the animation is really cool! What would you say about Google's SREs - how would SRE fit into the 3 LoD model? Can't quite figure if SRE architects or teams fit in 1st/2nd LoD. They're directly doing the ops work while ensuring resilience & monitor controls (1st LoD) but also they de-facto shape the risk policies & standards + generate the metrics for reporting and compliance (2nd-ish LoD).
Thanks for your comment and sorry for the late reply. Good question. Assuming you are referring to site reliability engineering, my first instinct is 1st line. Of course this widely depends on the organization and how SRE is positioned.
Wow this is genuinely such a good explanation of the relationship between the three lines, as well as the other relevant bodies. Very helpful for my final :)
Great quality content, which consicely summarises the model. Mark breaks down each component in an easy to follow manner applying personal insights and business knowledge. Really valuable video, will definitely be watching further videos
This was great, thanks for putting it together :)
Well put together and explained. Thanks
Detailed presentation and easy to understanding 👌
Nice animations Mark 👍🏻
Thanks 😁
Valuable information thank you Mark
Mark the animation is really cool! What would you say about Google's SREs - how would SRE fit into the 3 LoD model? Can't quite figure if SRE architects or teams fit in 1st/2nd LoD. They're directly doing the ops work while ensuring resilience & monitor controls (1st LoD) but also they de-facto shape the risk policies & standards + generate the metrics for reporting and compliance (2nd-ish LoD).
Thanks for your comment and sorry for the late reply. Good question. Assuming you are referring to site reliability engineering, my first instinct is 1st line. Of course this widely depends on the organization and how SRE is positioned.
Good explanation.... Could you please advice on an example and its risk on a particular product
Quick Question >>Where does the IT Auditor sit in this Model? 2nd OR 3rd Line?
Third line.
youre a hero
Hi, can I use you're material for internal training presentation?
If it's internal only, yes. All I ask is that you reference "Mark Thomas, Escoute LLC" in your presentation. Thank you for asking :)
Thank you Sir Mark, you're video is really good and informative, thank you so much